Next Article in Journal
The ‘Hawk-Dove’ Game and the Speed of the Evolutionary Process in Small Heterogeneous Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Inequality Aversion and Reciprocity in Moonlighting Games
Previous Article in Journal
The Recursive Core for Non-Superadditive Games
Open AccessArticle

Equity versus Efficiency? Evidence from Three-Person Generosity Experiments

Strategic Interaction Group, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Kahlaische Straße 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
Human Resource Management and Organization, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Nauklerstraße 47, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
Economic Theory, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Mohlstraße 36, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Games 2010, 1(2), 89-102;
Received: 16 March 2010 / Revised: 16 April 2010 / Accepted: 16 April 2010 / Published: 22 April 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Other-Regarding Preferences)
In two-person generosity games, the proposer’s agreement payoff is exogenously given, whereas that of the responder is endogenously determined by the proposer’s choice of the pie size. In three-person generosity games, equal agreement payoffs for two of the players are either exogenously excluded or imposed. We predict that the latter crowds out - or at least weakens - efficiency seeking. Our treatments rely on a 2x3 factorial design, differing in whether the responder or the third (dummy) player is the residual claimant and whether the proposer’s agreement payoff is larger, equal, or smaller than the other exogenously given agreement payoff. View Full-Text
Keywords: generosity game; equity; efficiency; experiment generosity game; equity; efficiency; experiment
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Güth, W.; Pull, K.; Stadler, M.; Stribeck, A. Equity versus Efficiency? Evidence from Three-Person Generosity Experiments. Games 2010, 1, 89-102.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop