Next Article in Journal
Correction: Mosca et al. Sarcoma Common MHC-I Haplotype Restricts Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Response. Cancers 2022, 14, 3414
Previous Article in Journal
High-Frequency Ultrasound Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma: Correlations Between Histopathological Subtype, Vascularity, and Age/Sex Distribution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marrow Microenvironmental Pathobiology and Therapeutic Opportunities for TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia

1
Division of Malignant Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
2
Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020275
Submission received: 30 December 2025 / Revised: 13 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 16 January 2026

Simple Summary

The marrow microenvironment associated with TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia is one of immunosuppression, namely mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells and characterized by aberrancy of native immune regulator cells, cytokines, leukemic cell-surface receptors and cellular metabolism. The growing understanding of this pathobiology with the molecular subset of disease has fostered the development of novel therapies that leverage intracellular/signal transduction targets, co-opted biologic pathways, and cell-surface elements that impact the immune environment for this population in critical need of effective therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

Mutations in TP53 inhibit p53 protective behaviors including cell cycle arrest, DNA damage repair protein recruitment, and apoptosis. The ubiquity of p53 in genome-stabilizing functions leads to an aberrant tumor microenvironment in TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Profound immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells, the upregulation of cytokines and cell-surface receptors on leukemic cells, the suppression of native immune regulator cells, and metabolic aberrations in the bone marrow are features of the TP53-mutated AML/MDS marrow microenvironment. These localized changes in the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) explain why traditional therapies for MDS/AML, including chemotherapeutics and hypomethylating agents, are not as effective in TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms and demonstrate the dire need for new treatments in this patient population. The unique pathophysiology of TP53-mutated disease also provides new therapeutic approaches which are being studied, including intracellular targets (MDM2, p53), cell-surface protein biologics (immune checkpoint inhibitors, BiTE therapy, and antibody–drug conjugates), cell therapies (CAR-T, NK-cell), signal transduction pathways (Hedgehog, Wnt, NF-κB, CCRL2, and HIF-1α), and co-opted biologic pathways (cholesterol synthesis and glycolysis). In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiologic anomalies of the tumor microenvironment in TP53-mutant MDS/AML, the hypothesized mechanisms of chemoresistance it imparts, and how novel therapies are leveraging diverse therapeutic targets to address this critical area of need.

1. Introduction

TP53 encodes for the tumor-suppressor p53 protein, which plays an essential role in genomic stability [1,2]. Once DNA damage is detected by one of three DNA damage response (DDR) kinases (ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK), p53 is activated and protects the cell in three distinct ways [3,4]. It mediates cell cycle arrest (primarily through p21), activates a slew of DNA damage repair proteins, and initiates apoptosis if the damage is deemed to be too extensive or irreparable [4,5]. TP53 inactivation (via overexpression of MDM2, a negative regulator of TP53) or direct mutation impairs these functions, causing unregulated proliferation and immune evasion [6,7,8,9,10].
Mutations in TP53 are detected in nearly half of all human malignancies that have been extensively sequenced [11,12,13]. While TP53 is mutated less often in myeloid neoplasms (~10%) [14,15,16,17], there is enrichment among patients who are older or incur disease arising out of prior cytotoxic therapy, previously known as therapy-related AML, which associated with a 30–40% rate of TP53-mutated disease [18,19,20,21]. Evidence of age-related TP53-mutated clones preferentially expanding under the pressure of cytotoxic therapy, rather than evidence showing prior therapy directly inducing new TP53 mutations eventually begetting disease, has been proffered [22]. Ultimately, the chemoresistance exhibited by TP53-mutated MDS/AML associates with lower rates of remission, shorter durations of remission, and, consequently, a dismal median overall survival (OS) of 5–10 months relative to other etiologies of MDS/AML, which often have a median OS of >24 months [19,23,24]. Recent studies have also shown that biallelic TP53 alteration does correlate with poorer prognosis when compared to monoallelic loss, suggesting a tiered effect on prognosis based on the amount of available native protein [25,26].
These notably poorer outcomes have led recent classification systems and guideline bodies to recategorize TP53-mutated disease as a unique entity. The most recent World Health Organization (WHO-5) classification concedes that MDS with biallelic TP53 inactivation (MDS-biTP53) may be regarded as a functional AML equivalent for therapeutic considerations [27]. Additionally, the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) considers TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms to be a separate category independent of blast percentage at diagnosis due to their universal aggressiveness/treatment resistance [28,29,30,31].
The bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) is an encompassing term for dynamic multicellular marrow niches that regulate the function and differentiation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSCs) [32,33,34]. These niches contain structural cells (stromal cells, endothelial cells, and osteoblasts), immune regulatory cells (macrophages, regulatory T cells) [35,36], and are influenced by specific cytokines (CXCL12, SCF, and TGF-β) that can allow the selective expansion of hematopoietic cell lines and maintenance of homeostasis [37,38]. Further signaling via the HIF-1α/CXCR4 pathway leads to stabilization and maturation of the BMME niche [39,40]. Aberrations in any component of this delicate homeostasis can be leukemogenic. Studies have found that cellular dysfunction leading to changes in gene (SBDS) or cytokine (β-catenin) expression can precipitate myeloid neoplasms [41,42,43,44]. TP53-mutated myeloid malignancies, specifically, are characterized by the overexpression of suppressive regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and the underexpression of surveilling cytotoxic/helper T cells and NK cells [45,46], ultimately subject to an extremely immunosuppressive BMME.
In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiologic anomalies of the tumor microenvironment in TP53-mutant MDS/AML, the hypothesized mechanisms of chemoresistance it imparts, and how novel therapies are leveraging diverse therapeutic targets to address this critical area of need.

2. p53 Protein Function and Aberrancy with Mutation

The fully translated p53 protein consists of five key domains [Figure 1]. An N-terminal transactivation domain, which is the site of MDM2 binding [47,48]; a proline-rich domain, which mediates nuclear export and apoptosis via MAPK signaling [49]; the primary DNA-binding domain (DBD), which is critical for its genome surveillance activity [50,51]; the homo-oligomerization domain (HOD), which helps form the biologically active tetrameric form of p53 [52]; and the C-terminal domain, which modulates the DBD [53,54].
Mutations in TP53 are most common in the DBD (~85%), of which around 10% are frameshift or nonsense mutations preventing protein production entirely, with the remaining 90% being missense mutations leading to non-functional protein [55,56,57]. These missense mutations have been found to exert a dominant-negative effect in myeloid neoplasms [58,59]. A minority of TP53 mutations occur in the HOD (~10%), which also exerts a dominant-negative effect [60]. The inactivation of p53 leads to impaired genomic surveillance and the suppression of many downstream signals which would otherwise halt reproduction or signal for apoptosis, creating a microenvironment of profound immunosuppression.
While TP53 mutations are inherently oncogenic, the transition to myeloid neoplasm is driven by a selective pressure. The most common of these are clonal hematopoiesis or the receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clonal hematopoiesis has been found to drive hematopoietic stem cell (HPSC) expansion on its own, specifically through interaction with the epigenetic regulator EZH2 [61,62]. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been found not to directly induce TP53-mutant myeloid neoplasm but rather the inherent chemoresistance of these cells leads to preferential expansion after exposure to chemotherapy [22,63].
These many modulations of the TP53-mutant BMME contribute to the resistance to many conventional cancer-directed therapies, including anthracycline/cytarabine [64,65], hypomethylating agents (decitabine/azacitidine) [66], and venetoclax [67,68,69]. Consequently, a valid emphasis has been placed on the identification of viable therapeutic strategies bypassing classical cytotoxic strategies for TP53-mutated MDS/AML. Below are the major mechanisms of chemoresistance imparted by TP53-mutated MDS/AML [Figure 2] and the state of research into therapeutics leveraging BMME aberrancy [Table 1].

3. TP53-Mutated MDS/AML Marrow Microenvironmental Features and Therapeutic Implications

3.1. Leukemic Cell Modifications

3.1.1. Direct Effect of the Mutant p53 Protein

Targeting non- or sub-functioning mutant p53 proteins and, namely, restoring cellular pro-apoptotic functioning amongst malignant clones is the ideal downstream strategy. Two general classes of agents are hypothesized to exert this effect: MDM2 inhibitors and p53 “refolding agents”. MDM2 binds to p53 and marks it for degradation with the thought that MDM2 inhibition would lead to higher levels of native p53 protein [70]. For MDS/AML, MDM2 inhibitors have not advanced beyond clinical trials, with the most notable study being the MIRROS Phase III trial, which analyzed cytarabine with or without the small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor idasanutlin [71]. Of note, this trial eventually enrolled patients irrespective of TP53 status, as some missense mutations predict retained p53 functionality. This trial was stopped for futility with no difference in the median overall survival (mOS) or CR rate, though the combination did improve the overall response rate (ORR). A Phase I/II study of the MDM2 inhibitor alrizomadlin is actively recruiting [72]. Challenges to the implementation of these agents include profound myelosuppression, and case studies suggest a risk of TP53-altered hematopoiesis after exposure to these agents [73,74,75,76].
A more promising strategy for TP53-mutated MDS/AML is agents which induce p53 refolding to its native, biologically active conformation [77]. The most studied agent in this class is APR-246 (eprenetapopt), for which a Phase III trial comparing azacitidine ± APR-246 for patients with TP53-mutated MDS was recently completed and was negative for its primary endpoint of complete remission, although secondary endpoint data are pending [78]. The viability of APR-246, or in the oral form APR-548, in a subsequent TP53-mutated myeloid malignancy trial with modified trial design is currently being explored. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) was recently found to directly bind and rescue a number of TP53 structural mutations [79] and was found to induce AML cell death in vitro [80]. The results of several currently active prospective trials of ATO in TP53-mutated MDS/AML are pending, with other prospective trials being planned.

3.1.2. Inhibition of T-Cell Activation

TP53-mutated MDS/AML marrow tissue is shown to be that of downregulated major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II expression and upregulated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression [81,82,83]. T-cell activation is predicated upon dual signals [84], one between the T-cell receptor (TCR) and MHC (CD4+ helper T cells binding to MHC class II on antigen-presenting cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells binding to MHC class I on tumor cells [82,85], also requiring co-stimulation between OX40-OX40L and 4-IBB-4-IBBL in order to fully activate [86]) and another one most often between CD28 on the T cell and CD80/86 on the tumor cell [87]. These two signals lead to the proliferation of countless T cells that recognize the presented antigen but are mediated by the immune checkpoints like CTLA-4 in the T cell, which competes with CD28 for binding to CD80/86 and downregulates the immune response [88]; as well, the binding between programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) on cytotoxic T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells inhibits the cytotoxic activation [89]. Further upregulation of PD-L1 is noted in patients with myeloid neoplasm who were treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) decitabine or azacitidine [90,91].
In light of the impressive results of ICIs for other cancers like melanoma and lung cancer [92,93], it has been an area of considerable research interest in MDS/AML [94]. Their importance is further highlighted given the upregulation of immune checkpoint proteins found with TP53-mutated MDS/AML [83]. However, the majority of trials have not been specific to TP53-mutated disease. Amongst classical ICIs targeted against PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4, Phase II and III trials of pembrolizumab [95,96], nivolumab [97], durvalumab [98], and ipilimumab [99] have failed to show survival benefit. Secondary analyses are ongoing and may hopefully identify biomarkers useful for future trial design with classical ICIs.
Non-classical ICIs are also being investigated. Myeloid-specific immune checkpoints including LIRRB3/LIRRB4 have been discovered to be overexpressed in TP53-mutated MDS/AML and have correlated with enhanced leukemic cell survival [91,100,101]. These alterations help TP53-mutated leukemic MDS/AML evade detection by cytotoxic T cells and create a profoundly immunosuppressed environment. Overstimulation of other proteins has been found to play a role in T-cell inhibition as a mechanism of leukemic proliferation, including CTLA-4, TIM-3, and LAG-3 [102,103,104,105]. Beyond T cells, studies have shown that monocyte immune checkpoints also play a role in the proliferation of MDS/AML, including Clever-1, and their blockade can attenuate the effect of other therapies [106,107]. Trials evaluating non-classical immune checkpoint inhibition including TIM-3 and LAG-3 have either yielded no positive results or are ongoing [108,109]. Clinical data for non-classical immune checkpoint inhibition LILRB4 has emerged as an attractive myeloid-specific immune checkpoint target, with Phase I clinical trials as a monoclonal antibody (IO-202) or STAR-T cell forms showing promising results [110,111]. Studies of the monocyte-specific ICI, bexmarilimab, show promising results for TP53-mutated MDS [112].

3.1.3. Anti-Phagocytic Activity

Another major mechanism contributing to the immunosuppressive environment in TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm is the overexpression of “don’t eat me” cell-surface proteins preventing phagocytosis. One major example is between CD47 on cancer cells and SIRP alpha on phagocytic cells [113,114]. This protein is heavily overexpressed on cancer cells to evade immune detection and phagocytosis by macrophages [115,116], although expression varies based on genotype [117]. The anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab had promising Phase II results, leading to the development of a trio of Phase III trials. The ENHANCE trial compared azacitidine ± magrolimab, the ENHANCE-2 trial compared azacitidine + magrolimab versus azacitidine/venetoclax or intensive chemotherapy, and the ENHANCE-3 trial compared azacitidine/venetoclax ± magrolimab [118,119,120]. Each of these trials were discontinued due to futility in the experimental arm.
CD33 is another important protein that prevents detection by macrophages and is notably overexpressed on AML leukemic blasts and appears dispensable for hematopoiesis, allowing for a favorable therapeutic index [121,122]. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD33, received FDA approval in 2017 for adult and pediatric patients with CD33+ AML [123,124]. However, many other CD33-directed therapies have been investigated since. Several Phase I trials studying CD33+ CAR-T/CAR-NK cells are ongoing [125,126], and preclinical data for a CD33-targeting ADC with a GSPT1-targeted payload has shown striking leukemia cell kill in TP53-mutated cell lines [127].

3.1.4. Enhancing Leukemic Cell Proliferation

TP53-mutated MDS/AML exhibits further chemoresistance by the upregulation of cell-surface proteins that aid in leukemic cell proliferation. One protein that is of particular interest is CD123, the receptor for IL-3, which leads to downstream proliferation [128,129]. CD123 is overexpressed in MDS/AML cells, but the extent of overexpression varies based on the cytogenetic profile of the disease [130,131]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD123 have not proven to be overtly successful yet, with the Phase II/III trial comparing decitabine ± talacotuzumab showing no survival benefit with considerable toxicity [132]. After this result, other Phase II studies of single-agent talacotuzumab were terminated early [133,134]. CD123-CD3 bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) have also been studied in patients with MDS/AML harboring TP53 mutations. A Phase II trial of flotetuzumab was terminated early [135], although a Phase II trial of vibecotamab associated with a 50% CRL rate amongst patients with TP53-mutated disease [136]. Administration schedules have also limited enthusiasm for some of these earlier products. Another CD123-targeted agent, tagraxofusp (diphtheria toxin-IL-3 conjugate), is actively recruiting for a Phase II trial and has demonstrated encouraging data in combination with HMA + venetoclax for newly diagnosed AML [137]. Other CD123-targeted therapies in early trials include CD123-CD16 BiTE AFM28 [138], the ADC pivekimab sunirine (IMGN632) [139], and CAR-T/CAR-NK cell trials [140,141].

3.2. Abnormal Immune Cell Populations

In addition to aberrant T-cell surface protein expression, T-cell populations are inherently abnormal in TP53-mutated MDS/AML. One study found elevated levels of ICOShigh/PD-1neg T-regulatory cells in patients with TP53-mutated MDS/AML [46]. Consistent with prior research, this study also found that the presence of more of these aberrant T-regulatory cells correlated with a poor prognosis independent of TP53 mutation status [142,143]. Furthermore, effector memory T cells are also overrepresented in TP53-mutated MDS/AML and overexpress genes that drive exhausted T-cell states, including PRDM1, leading to a less effective immune response [144].
Furthermore, chronic inflammatory states like cancer are subject to disrupted regular myelopoiesis, diverting immature myeloid cells from monocytes/granulocytes to produce more MDSCs, which lack phagocytic activity and are immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory in nature [145,146]. MDSCs employ several pathways to mediate immunosuppression including their expression of the protein-inducible NOS and COX2 [147,148,149,150], their production of the cytokines TGF-β and IL-10 [151,152], and the induction of regulatory T cells amongst the larger T-cell repertoire [153]. MDSCs are found to be highly overexpressed in myeloid neoplasms, and elevated levels confer a poor prognosis [154,155,156,157]. AML marrows are also found to be preferentially enriched for M2 macrophages. Compared to their pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage counterparts, M2 macrophages are anti-inflammatory cells that aid in phagocytosis resistance among leukemic stem cells [158]. One study of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes in AML marrows demonstrated that TP53-mutated AML associates with a high expression of CD206, a marker of M2 macrophages [159]. No therapies directly targeting these immunosuppressive cell populations are currently in clinical trial.

3.3. Cytokine Signaling Pathways

Wnt/β-catenin signaling leads to stem cell proliferation, and overactivation of this pathway is associated with a higher risk of relapse and poorer prognosis with myeloid neoplasms [160,161], while its disruption leads to decreased proliferation [162]. Studies have also shown that Wnt signaling leads to increased tumor-associated macrophages and T-regulatory cell populations while decreasing cytotoxic T-cell activity in the BMME [163,164]. Upregulation of Wnt signaling in TP53-mutated MDS/AML has been associated with an improved rate of response to CAR T-cell therapy [165]. However, this pathway is not currently undergoing trials specific to TP53-mutated MDS/AML [166].
The Hedgehog pathway is also altered in MDS/AML and plays a major role in cell differentiation. It is upregulated in many cancers, including AML [167,168]. This signaling causes increased levels of PD-L1 overexpressing tumor-associated macrophages, which leads to T-cell exhaustion and inhibits the anti-tumor inflammatory response [169,170]. However, studies found that TP53-mutated MDS/AML has lower rates of Hedgehog expression compared to their TP53-WT counterparts and had a consequently poorer response to Hedgehog-directed therapy [171,172], making it a poor target for TP53-mutated MDS/AML. This was validated in the Phase III BRIGHT AML 1019 trial evaluating glasdegib (smoothened inhibitor), which failed to show improvement in mOS for the entire cohort, as well as for the TP53-mutated subset [173].
Dysregulation of NF-κB signaling is found in up to 40% of AML patients, contributing to oncogenesis and chemoresistance [174]. It does so through two main mechanisms: upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-α, as well as increasing populations of the aforementioned T-regulatory cells and MDSCs. These aberrations lead to a very inhospitable BMME for traditional immune cells and prevent detection. Pathologic NF-κB signaling is additionally associated with upregulation of the anti-apoptotic BH3 proteins BCL-XL and MCL-1, which promotes leukemic stem cell chemoresistance [175,176]. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that acts on the NF-κB signaling pathway. It advanced to a Phase III trial, which did not improve treatment outcomes for children with AML, and has not been studied in adults [177].
The CCRL2/IFN-γ pathway is upregulated in TP53-mutated AML, especially acute erythroid leukemia. This pathway is upregulated in the absence of viable p53 proteins and has been associated with transforming pre-leukemic single-hit TP53 clones into multi-hit TP53-mutated AML [178]. Attempts have been made to target this pathway, including with a pyroolobenzodiazepine-conjugated anti-CCRL2 ADC [179].
Lastly, the HIF-1α/CXCR4 pathway is upregulated in TP53-mutated MDS/AML. Preclinical studies of the HIF-1α inhibitor echinomycin have shown promise, specifically for myeloid malignancies, but have not reached clinical trials [180]. The CXCR4 inhibitor plerixafor showed higher survival among the TP53-mutated subgroup in a Phase I trial, although this result was underpowered to reach statistical significance [181].

3.4. Other Biological Pathways

Amongst the natural pathways leveraged by MDS/AML cells to proliferate is the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Xia et al. found that lovastatin (an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) can induce a significant apoptotic effect in human AML cells through the inhibition of geranylgeranylation [182]. Another study found that statins induce the rapid differentiation of AML cells leading to apoptosis [183]. Bisphosphonates exhibit anti-leukemic activity by blocking farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, an enzyme further downstream in the mevalonate pathway [184]. Subsequent studies have identified TP53-mutated MDS/AML as being reliant upon the mevalonate pathway for an adaptive stress response, upregulating glutathione production for the management of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and leading to cytarabine chemoresistance [185]. Given the reliance of leukemic cells on cholesterol synthesis for replication, statins have been explored both in Phase I/II trials without efficacy results being reported [186,187].
Many malignancies are characterized by an overreliance on glycolysis for energy production, given that they proliferate rapidly in anaerobic conditions, preferentially converting glucose to lactate, termed the Warburg Effect [188]. Hematologic malignancies are no exception, demonstrating that the upregulation of genes involved in glycolysis and glucose transport correlate with reduced chemosensitivity and poorer OS [189,190,191]. Additionally, one study found that Vitamin D leads to a precipitous increase in fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBP1 gene), the main rate-limiting enzyme in gluconeogenesis, which also suppresses glycolysis and could prohibit leukemic cells from utilizing this energy source [192]. Despite the theoretical benefit from targeting the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways, no trials are currently active.
Lastly, the creatine kinase pathway has been implicated as a target for some patients with activating mutations in the EVI1 gene. This activating mutation leads to CKMT1 expression and energy production in leukemic cells [193,194]. However, this pathway is not as active in patients with other driver mutations, including TP53.

4. Conclusions and Future Directions

TP53-mutated MDS/AML is among the most complicated to treat due to the many adaptations to the BMME, which cause resistance to many commonly used therapies. While the mechanisms of resistance are still being elucidated, it is suspected that these adaptations make the BMME inhospitable for native immune cells, decreasing the efficacy of immunotherapies and targeted therapies which have seen benefit with TP53 WT disease. This harsher microenvironment may also be a major driver limiting the success of the many clinical trials discussed above. The effect of pre-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning intensity, which may predict the different likelihoods and impacts of residual host marrow cells and relevant pathobiologies described above, for TP53-mutated MDS/AML requires dedicated study. It is also unclear if the described mechanisms can at least partly be reproduced in neoplasms other than MDS/AML and similarly require further study.
Translational studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of resistance and immune evasion by TP53-mutated leukemic cells are helping to guide future drug targets and trials. Amongst the most promising opportunities for effectively targeting the mutant TP53 BMME are acting upon the p53 axis itself, the immunosuppressive or myeloproliferative cell-surface proteins, perturbed signaling pathways, and metabolic pathways upon which TP53-mutated MDS/AML pathobiology depends. The study of how these agents can best be harnessed to overcome the unique BMME in TP53-mutated disease is essential to drive better outcomes for patients.
Figure 2. Elements of the bone marrow microenvironment in TP53-mutated MDS/AML [195]. The combination of upregulating immunosuppressive M2 macrophages, MDSCs, and Treg cells while downregulating native macrophages and cytotoxic T cells create the profoundly immunosuppressive BMME.
Figure 2. Elements of the bone marrow microenvironment in TP53-mutated MDS/AML [195]. The combination of upregulating immunosuppressive M2 macrophages, MDSCs, and Treg cells while downregulating native macrophages and cytotoxic T cells create the profoundly immunosuppressive BMME.
Cancers 18 00275 g002

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J.H. and R.M.S.; validation, C.J.H., A.P.I. and R.M.S.; investigation, C.J.H., A.P.I. and R.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J.H., A.P.I. and R.M.S.; writing—review and editing, C.J.H., A.P.I. and R.M.S.; visualization, C.J.H. and R.M.S.; supervision, A.P.I. and R.M.S.; project administration, R.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

C.J.H. and A.P.I. have no relationships to disclose. R.M.S. has served in a consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Geron, Gilead Sciences Inc, Kura Oncology, Rigel, Servier, Syndax Pharmaceuticals and TScan Therapeutics, and has participated in a Steering Committee for Servier.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BMMEBone marrow microenvironment
AMLAcute myeloid leukemia
MDSMyelodysplastic syndrome
CAR-TChimeric antigen receptor T-cell
BiTEBispecific T-cell engager
ADCAntibody-drug conjugate
ICIImmune checkpoint inhibitor
HPSCHematopoietic stem cell
MDSCMyeloid-derived suppressor cell

References

  1. Hernandez Borrero, L.J.; El-Deiry, W.S. Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Cancer 2021, 1876, 188556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lane, D.P. Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome. Nature 1992, 358, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blackford, A.N.; Jackson, S.P. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 801–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, H.; Xu, J.; Long, Y.; Maimaitijiang, A.; Su, Z.; Li, W.; Li, J. Unraveling the Guardian: P53’s Multifaceted Role in the DNA Damage Response and Tumor Treatment Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shu, K.X.; Li, B.; Wu, L.X. The p53 network: P53 and its downstream genes. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 55, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bykov, V.J.N.; Eriksson, S.E.; Bianchi, J.; Wiman, K.G. Targeting mutant p53 for efficient cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlsen, L.; Zhang, S.; Tian, X.; De La Cruz, A.; George, A.; Arnoff, T.E.; El-Deiry, W.S. The role of p53 in anti-tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1148389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Zhang, T.; Su, W.; Dou, Z.; Zhao, D.; Jin, X.; Lei, H.; Wang, J.; Xie, X.; Cheng, B.; et al. Mutant p53 in cancer: From molecular mechanism to therapeutic modulation. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jones, S.N.; Hancock, A.R.; Vogel, H.; Donehower, L.A.; Bradley, A. Overexpression of Mdm2 in mice reveals a p53-independent role for Mdm2 in tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 15608–15612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haupt, Y.; Maya, R.; Kazaz, A.; Oren, M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 1997, 387, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kandoth, C.; McLellan, M.D.; Vandin, F.; Ye, K.; Niu, B.; Lu, C.; Xie, M.; Zhang, Q.; McMichael, J.F.; Wyczalkowski, M.A.; et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 2013, 502, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Olivier, M.; Hollstein, M.; Hainaut, P. TP53 mutations in human cancers: Origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a001008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stratton, M.R.; Campbell, P.J.; Futreal, P.A. The cancer genome. Nature 2009, 458, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chiereghin, C.; Travaglino, E.; Zampini, M.; Saba, E.; Saitta, C.; Riva, E.; Bersanelli, M.; Della Porta, M.G. The Genetics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Clinical Relevance. Genes 2021, 12, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Molica, M.; Mazzone, C.; Niscola, P.; de Fabritiis, P. TP53 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Still a Daunting Challenge? Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 610820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Papaemmanuil, E.; Gerstung, M.; Bullinger, L.; Gaidzik, V.I.; Paschka, P.; Roberts, N.D.; Potter, N.E.; Heuser, M.; Thol, F.; Bolli, N.; et al. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2209–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saygin, C.; Godley, L.A. Genetics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Cancers 2021, 13, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rucker, F.G.; Schlenk, R.F.; Bullinger, L.; Kayser, S.; Teleanu, V.; Kett, H.; Habdank, M.; Kugler, C.M.; Holzmann, K.; Gaidzik, V.I.; et al. TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood 2012, 119, 2114–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santini, V.; Stahl, M.; Sallman, D.A. TP53 Mutations in Acute Leukemias and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Insights and Treatment Updates. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2024, 44, e432650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shahzad, M.; Amin, M.K.; Daver, N.G.; Shah, M.V.; Hiwase, D.; Arber, D.A.; Kharfan-Dabaja, M.A.; Badar, T. What have we learned about TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia? Blood Cancer J. 2024, 14, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stengel, A.; Kern, W.; Haferlach, T.; Meggendorfer, M.; Fasan, A.; Haferlach, C. The impact of TP53 mutations and TP53 deletions on survival varies between AML, ALL, MDS and CLL: An analysis of 3307 cases. Leukemia 2017, 31, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wong, T.N.; Ramsingh, G.; Young, A.L.; Miller, C.A.; Touma, W.; Welch, J.S.; Lamprecht, T.L.; Shen, D.; Hundal, J.; Fulton, R.S.; et al. Role of TP53 mutations in the origin and evolution of therapy-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2015, 518, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, X.; Liang, Z.; Ji, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.; Ou, J.; Cen, X.; Ren, H.; Wuchty, S.; et al. Comparative outcome and prognostic factor analysis among MDS/AML patients with TP53 mutations, snps, and wild type. Hum. Genom. 2025, 19, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, S.; Kim, S.-A.; Lee, J.Y.; Byun, J.M.; Lee, J.-O.; Koh, Y.; Hong, J.; Lee, J.; Bang, S.-M.; Kim, I.; et al. Unraveling TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Insights and Genetic Profiles. Blood 2024, 144, 5944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sallman, D.A. Can we harmonize classification of TP53 mutant MDS/AML? Blood Adv. 2025, 9, 3381–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shah, M.V.; Hung, K.; Baranwal, A.; Kutyna, M.M.; Al-Kali, A.; Toop, C.; Greipp, P.; Brown, A.; Shah, S.; Khanna, S.; et al. Evidence-based risk stratification of myeloid neoplasms harboring TP53 mutations. Blood Adv. 2025, 9, 3370–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khoury, J.D.; Solary, E.; Abla, O.; Akkari, Y.; Alaggio, R.; Apperley, J.F.; Bejar, R.; Berti, E.; Busque, L.; Chan, J.K.C.; et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia 2022, 36, 1703–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arber, D.A.; Orazi, A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Borowitz, M.J.; Calvo, K.R.; Kvasnicka, H.M.; Wang, S.A.; Bagg, A.; Barbui, T.; Branford, S.; et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: Integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood 2022, 140, 1200–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dohner, H.; DiNardo, C.D.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Craddock, C.; Dombret, H.; Ebert, B.L.; Fenaux, P.; Godley, L.A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Larson, R.A.; et al. Genetic risk classification for adults with AML receiving less-intensive therapies: The 2024 ELN recommendations. Blood 2024, 144, 2169–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dohner, H.; Wei, A.H.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Craddock, C.; DiNardo, C.D.; Dombret, H.; Ebert, B.L.; Fenaux, P.; Godley, L.A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 2022, 140, 1345–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Greenberg, P.L.; Stone, R.M.; Abaza, Y.; Al-Kali, A.; Anand, S.; Ball, B.; Bennett, J.M.; Borate, U.; Brunner, A.M.; Chai-Ho, W.; et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 2.2025. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2025, 23, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Morrison, S.J.; Scadden, D.T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2014, 505, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pinho, S.; Frenette, P.S. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schofield, R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978, 4, 7–25. [Google Scholar]
  35. Seshadri, M.; Qu, C.K. Microenvironmental regulation of hematopoietic stem cells and its implications in leukemogenesis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2016, 23, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, H.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y. The role of immune cells settled in the bone marrow on adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2024, 81, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lucas, D. The Bone Marrow Microenvironment for Hematopoietic Stem Cells. In Stem Cell Microenvironments and Beyond; Birbrair, A., Ed.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 1041, pp. 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arai, F.; Hirao, A.; Ohmura, M.; Sato, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Takubo, K.; Ito, K.; Koh, G.Y.; Suda, T. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell 2004, 118, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barachini, S.; Montali, M.; Burzi, I.S.; Pardini, E.; Infirri, G.S.; Cassano, R.C.; Petrini, I. The role of the bone marrow microenvironment in leukemic stem cell resistance: Pathways of persistence and selection. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2025, 218, 105090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mempel, T.R.; Lill, J.K.; Altenburger, L.M. How chemokines organize the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2024, 24, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kode, A.; Manavalan, J.S.; Mosialou, I.; Bhagat, G.; Rathinam, C.V.; Luo, N.; Khiabanian, H.; Lee, A.; Murty, V.V.; Friedman, R.; et al. Leukaemogenesis induced by an activating beta-catenin mutation in osteoblasts. Nature 2014, 506, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krause, D.S.; Fulzele, K.; Catic, A.; Sun, C.C.; Dombkowski, D.; Hurley, M.P.; Lezeau, S.; Attar, E.; Wu, J.Y.; Lin, H.Y.; et al. Differential regulation of myeloid leukemias by the bone marrow microenvironment. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1513–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Raaijmakers, M.H.; Mukherjee, S.; Guo, S.; Zhang, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Schoonmaker, J.A.; Ebert, B.L.; Al-Shahrour, F.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Scadden, E.O.; et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature 2010, 464, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zambetti, N.A.; Ping, Z.; Chen, S.; Kenswil, K.J.G.; Mylona, M.A.; Sanders, M.A.; Hoogenboezem, R.M.; Bindels, E.M.J.; Adisty, M.N.; Van Strien, P.M.H.; et al. Mesenchymal Inflammation Drives Genotoxic Stress in Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Predicts Disease Evolution in Human Pre-leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Badar, T.; Knutson, K.L.; Foran, J.; Gangat, N.; Pavelko, K.D.; Kaufmann, S.H.; Litzow, M.R.; Murthy, H.; Cogen, D.; Ushman, M.; et al. T-cell immune cluster analysis using CyTOF identifies unique subgroups of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2025, 9, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sallman, D.A.; McLemore, A.F.; Aldrich, A.L.; Komrokji, R.S.; McGraw, K.L.; Dhawan, A.; Geyer, S.; Hou, H.A.; Eksioglu, E.A.; Sullivan, A.; et al. TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary AML confer an immunosuppressive phenotype. Blood 2020, 136, 2812–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Raj, N.; Attardi, L.D. The Transactivation Domains of the p53 Protein. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017, 7, a026047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nag, S.; Qin, J.; Srivenugopal, K.S.; Wang, M.; Zhang, R. The MDM2-p53 pathway revisited. J. Biomed. Res. 2013, 27, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Dutta, M. The multifunctional proline-rich domain of p53 tumor suppressor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Cancer 2025, 1880, 189326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bouaoun, L.; Sonkin, D.; Ardin, M.; Hollstein, M.; Byrnes, G.; Zavadil, J.; Olivier, M. TP53 Variations in Human Cancers: New Lessons from the IARC TP53 Database and Genomics Data. Hum. Mutat. 2016, 37, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pavletich, N.P.; Chambers, K.A.; Pabo, C.O. The DNA-binding domain of p53 contains the four conserved regions and the major mutation hot spots. Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 2556–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamada, R.; Toguchi, Y.; Nomura, T.; Imagawa, T.; Sakaguchi, K. Tetramer formation of tumor suppressor protein p53: Structure, function, and applications. Biopolymers 2016, 106, 598–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cho, Y.; Gorina, S.; Jeffrey, P.D.; Pavletich, N.P. Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: Understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science 1994, 265, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. D’Abramo, M.; Besker, N.; Desideri, A.; Levine, A.J.; Melino, G.; Chillemi, G. The p53 tetramer shows an induced-fit interaction of the C-terminal domain with the DNA-binding domain. Oncogene 2016, 35, 3272–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Baugh, E.H.; Ke, H.; Levine, A.J.; Bonneau, R.A.; Chan, C.S. Why are there hotspot mutations in the TP53 gene in human cancers? Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jambhekar, A.; Ackerman, E.E.; Alpay, B.A.; Lahav, G.; Lovitch, S.B. Comparison of TP53 mutations in myelodysplasia and acute leukemia suggests divergent roles in initiation and progression. Blood Neoplasia 2024, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kotler, E.; Shani, O.; Goldfeld, G.; Lotan-Pompan, M.; Tarcic, O.; Gershoni, A.; Hopf, T.A.; Marks, D.S.; Oren, M.; Segal, E. A Systematic p53 Mutation Library Links Differential Functional Impact to Cancer Mutation Pattern and Evolutionary Conservation. Mol. Cell 2018, 71, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boettcher, S.; Miller, P.G.; Sharma, R.; McConkey, M.; Leventhal, M.; Krivtsov, A.V.; Giacomelli, A.O.; Wong, W.; Kim, J.; Chao, S.; et al. A dominant-negative effect drives selection of TP53 missense mutations in myeloid malignancies. Science 2019, 365, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Z.; Burigotto, M.; Ghetti, S.; Vaillant, F.; Tan, T.; Capaldo, B.D.; Palmieri, M.; Hirokawa, Y.; Tai, L.; Simpson, D.S.; et al. Loss-of-Function but Not Gain-of-Function Properties of Mutant TP53 Are Critical for the Proliferation, Survival, and Metastasis of a Broad Range of Cancer Cells. Cancer Discov. 2024, 14, 362–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gencel-Augusto, J.; Lozano, G. p53 tetramerization: At the center of the dominant-negative effect of mutant p53. Genes Dev. 2020, 34, 1128–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, S.; Wang, Q.; Yu, H.; Capitano, M.L.; Vemula, S.; Nabinger, S.C.; Gao, R.; Yao, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Geng, Z.; et al. Mutant p53 drives clonal hematopoiesis through modulating epigenetic pathway. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Steensma, D.P.; Bejar, R.; Jaiswal, S.; Lindsley, R.C.; Sekeres, M.A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Ebert, B.L. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and its distinction from myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2015, 126, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yan, B.; Chen, Q.; Xu, J.; Li, W.; Xu, B.; Qiu, Y. Low-frequency TP53 hotspot mutation contributes to chemoresistance through clonal expansion in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2020, 34, 1816–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hientz, K.; Mohr, A.; Bhakta-Guha, D.; Efferth, T. The role of p53 in cancer drug resistance and targeted chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 8921–8946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Prochazka, K.T.; Pregartner, G.; Rucker, F.G.; Heitzer, E.; Pabst, G.; Wolfler, A.; Zebisch, A.; Berghold, A.; Dohner, K.; Sill, H. Clinical implications of subclonal TP53 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2019, 104, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schimmer, R.R.; Kovtonyuk, L.V.; Klemm, N.; Fullin, J.; Stolz, S.M.; Mueller, J.; Caiado, F.; Kurppa, K.J.; Ebert, B.L.; Manz, M.G.; et al. TP53 mutations confer resistance to hypomethylating agents and BCL-2 inhibition in myeloid neoplasms. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 3201–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. DiNardo, C.D.; Tiong, I.S.; Quaglieri, A.; MacRaild, S.; Loghavi, S.; Brown, F.C.; Thijssen, R.; Pomilio, G.; Ivey, A.; Salmon, J.M.; et al. Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML. Blood 2020, 135, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Garciaz, S.; Saillard, C.; Hicheri, Y.; Hospital, M.A.; Vey, N. Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Basis, Evidences for Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy and Strategies to Target Resistance. Cancers 2021, 13, 5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gurnari, C.; Pagliuca, S.; Visconte, V. Deciphering the Therapeutic Resistance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Iwakuma, T.; Lozano, G. MDM2, an introduction. Mol. Cancer Res. 2003, 1, 993–1000. [Google Scholar]
  71. Konopleva, M.Y.; Rollig, C.; Cavenagh, J.; Deeren, D.; Girshova, L.; Krauter, J.; Martinelli, G.; Montesinos, P.; Schafer, J.A.; Ottmann, O.; et al. Idasanutlin plus cytarabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Results of the MIRROS trial. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 4147–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kadia, T.M.; Benton, C.; Erba, H.P.; Gandhi, M.; Levy, M.Y.; Percival, M.-E.M.; Ulrickson, M.; Yimer, H.; Yu, M.; Chen, Z.; et al. Trial in Progress: Phase 1b/2 Study of Alrizomadlin (APG-115), Alone or Combined with 5-Azacitidine (AZA), in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–13 December 2022; pp. 11659–11660. [Google Scholar]
  73. Andreeff, M.; Kelly, K.R.; Yee, K.; Assouline, S.; Strair, R.; Popplewell, L.; Bowen, D.; Martinelli, G.; Drummond, M.W.; Vyas, P.; et al. Results of the Phase I Trial of RG7112, a Small-Molecule MDM2 Antagonist in Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Khanna, V.; Eslami, G.; Reyes, R.; Diep, R.; Fernandez-Pol, S.; Stehr, H.; Suarez, C.J.; Pinto, H.; Ford, J.M.; Zhang, T.Y.; et al. MDM2 inhibition is associated with the emergence of TP53-altered clonal hematopoiesis. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2025, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Khurana, A.; Shafer, D.A. MDM2 antagonists as a novel treatment option for acute myeloid leukemia: Perspectives on the therapeutic potential of idasanutlin (RG7388). Onco Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 2903–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Senapati, J.; Muftuoglu, M.; Ishizawa, J.; Abbas, H.A.; Loghavi, S.; Borthakur, G.; Yilmaz, M.; Issa, G.C.; Dara, S.I.; Basyal, M.; et al. A Phase I study of Milademetan (DS3032b) in combination with low dose cytarabine with or without venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia: Clinical safety, efficacy, and correlative analysis. Blood Cancer J. 2023, 13, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hu, J.; Cao, J.; Topatana, W.; Juengpanich, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, B.; Shen, J.; Cai, L.; Cai, X.; Chen, M. Targeting mutant p53 for cancer therapy: Direct and indirect strategies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sallman, D.A.; DeZern, A.E.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Steensma, D.P.; Roboz, G.J.; Sekeres, M.A.; Cluzeau, T.; Sweet, K.L.; McLemore, A.; McGraw, K.L.; et al. Eprenetapopt (APR-246) and Azacitidine in TP53-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, S.; Wu, J.L.; Liang, Y.; Tang, Y.G.; Song, H.X.; Wu, L.L.; Xing, Y.F.; Yan, N.; Li, Y.T.; Wang, Z.Y.; et al. Arsenic Trioxide Rescues Structural p53 Mutations through a Cryptic Allosteric Site. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 225–239.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhu, G.; Fu, W.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Hou, J.; Zhong, H. Arsenic Trioxide Combine with G-CSF Triggers Distinct TP53 Mutations Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Ferroptosis through TP53-SLC7A11-GPX4 Pathway. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–12 December 2023; p. 5989. [Google Scholar]
  81. Wang, C.; Tan, J.Y.M.; Chitkara, N.; Bhatt, S. TP53 Mutation-Mediated Immune Evasion in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Cancers 2024, 16, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, J.; Lu, Q.; Chen, X.; Aifantis, I. Targeting MHC-I inhibitory pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. 2024, 45, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Christopher, M.J.; Petti, A.A.; Rettig, M.P.; Miller, C.A.; Chendamarai, E.; Duncavage, E.J.; Klco, J.M.; Helton, N.M.; O’Laughlin, M.; Fronick, C.C.; et al. Immune Escape of Relapsed AML Cells after Allogeneic Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2330–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bretscher, P.; Cohn, M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science 1970, 169, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shah, K.; Al-Haidari, A.; Sun, J.; Kazi, J.U. T cell receptor (TCR) signaling in health and disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Burke, K.P.; Chaudhri, A.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. The B7:CD28 family and friends: Unraveling coinhibitory interactions. Immunity 2024, 57, 223–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Esensten, J.H.; Helou, Y.A.; Chopra, G.; Weiss, A.; Bluestone, J.A. CD28 Costimulation: From Mechanism to Therapy. Immunity 2016, 44, 973–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kim, G.R.; Choi, J.M. Current Understanding of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) Signaling in T-Cell Biology and Disease Therapy. Mol. Cells 2022, 45, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, X.; Kang, K.; Chen, P.; Zeng, Z.; Li, G.; Xiong, W.; Yi, M.; Xiang, B. Regulatory mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 in cancers. Mol. Cancer 2024, 23, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, H.; Bueso-Ramos, C.; DiNardo, C.; Estecio, M.R.; Davanlou, M.; Geng, Q.R.; Fang, Z.; Nguyen, M.; Pierce, S.; Wei, Y.; et al. Expression of PD-L1, PD-L2, PD-1 and CTLA4 in myelodysplastic syndromes is enhanced by treatment with hypomethylating agents. Leukemia 2014, 28, 1280–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zeidan, A.M.; Bewersdorf, J.P.; Hasle, V.; Shallis, R.M.; Thompson, E.; de Menezes, D.L.; Rose, S.; Boss, I.; Halene, S.; Haferlach, T.; et al. Integrated genetic, epigenetic, and immune landscape of TP53 mutant AML and higher risk MDS treated with azacitidine. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2024, 15, 20406207241257904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gandhi, L.; Rodriguez-Abreu, D.; Gadgeel, S.; Esteban, E.; Felip, E.; De Angelis, F.; Domine, M.; Clingan, P.; Hochmair, M.J.; Powell, S.F.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2078–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wolchok, J.D.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Rutkowski, P.; Cowey, C.L.; Schadendorf, D.; Wagstaff, J.; Queirolo, P.; Dummer, R.; Butler, M.O.; Hill, A.G.; et al. Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Abaza, Y.; Zeidan, A.M. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Cells 2022, 11, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zeidan, A.M.; Boddu, P.C.; Wood, B.L.; Zelterman, D.; Little, R.F.; Ivy, S.P.; Caldwell, A.; Sanchez-Espiridion, B.; Alatrash, G.; Sharon, E.; et al. Blast MRD AML-1 Trial: Blockade of PD-1 Added to Standard Therapy to Target Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 1-an Investigator-Initiated, CTEP-Sponsored, Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Combination with Conventional Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) As Frontline Therapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 5–8 December 2020; p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  96. Stempel, J.M.; Uy, G.L.; Dinner, S.N.; Gojo, I.; Reed, D.; Roy, R.; Byrd, K.P.; Yerrabothala, S.; Lai, C.E.; Doucette, K.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab Added to Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from an Investigator-Initiated, Multi-Center, CTEP-Sponsored Randomized, Phase II Trial (BLAST AML-2). In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–10 December 2024; p. 736. [Google Scholar]
  97. Assouline, S.; Michaelis, L.C.; Othus, M.; Hay, A.E.; Walter, R.B.; Jacoby, M.A.; Schroeder, M.A.; Uy, G.L.; Law, L.Y.; Cheema, F.; et al. A randomized phase II/III study of ‘novel therapeutics’ versus azacitidine in newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), age 60 or older: A report of the comparison of azacitidine and nivolumab to azacitidine: SWOG S1612. Leuk. Lymphoma 2023, 64, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zeidan, A.M.; Boss, I.; Beach, C.L.; Copeland, W.B.; Thompson, E.; Fox, B.A.; Hasle, V.E.; Hellmann, A.; Taussig, D.C.; Tormo, M.; et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of azacitidine with or without durvalumab as first-line therapy for older patients with AML. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 2219–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bouligny, I.M.; Montalban-Bravo, G.; Sasaki, K.; Daver, N.; Jabbour, E.; Alvarado, Y.; DiNardo, C.D.; Ravandi, F.; Borthakur, G.; Bose, P.; et al. A phase II trial of azacitidine with ipilimumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab and nivolumab in previously untreated myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 2025, 110, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Wu, G.; Xu, Y.; Schultz, R.D.; Chen, H.; Xie, J.; Deng, M.; Liu, X.; Gui, X.; John, S.; Lu, Z.; et al. LILRB3 supports acute myeloid leukemia development and regulates T-cell antitumor immune responses through the TRAF2-cFLIP-NF-kappaB signaling axis. Nat. Cancer 2021, 2, 1170–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Deng, M.; Gui, X.; Kim, J.; Xie, L.; Chen, W.; Li, Z.; He, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Luo, W.; et al. LILRB4 signalling in leukaemia cells mediates T cell suppression and tumour infiltration. Nature 2018, 562, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Aref, S.; El Agdar, M.; El Sebaie, A.; Abouzeid, T.; Sabry, M.; Ibrahim, L. Prognostic Value of CD200 Expression and Soluble CTLA-4 Concentrations in Intermediate and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 2225–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bewersdorf, J.P.; Shallis, R.M.; Zeidan, A.M. Immune checkpoint inhibition in myeloid malignancies: Moving beyond the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways. Blood Rev. 2021, 45, 100709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rezaei, M.; Tan, J.; Zeng, C.; Li, Y.; Ganjalikhani-Hakemi, M. TIM-3 in Leukemia; Immune Response and Beyond. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 753677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sauer, N.; Szlasa, W.; Jonderko, L.; Oslizlo, M.; Kunachowicz, D.; Kulbacka, J.; Karlowicz-Bodalska, K. LAG-3 as a Potent Target for Novel Anticancer Therapies of a Wide Range of Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Aakko, S.; Ylitalo, A.; Kuusanmaki, H.; Rannikko, J.H.; Bjorkman, M.; Mandelin, J.; Heckman, C.A.; Kontro, M.; Hollmen, M. CLEVER-1 targeting antibody, bexmarilimab, supports HLA-DR expression and alters ex vivo responsiveness to azacitidine and venetoclax in myeloid malignancies. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 16775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xiang, X.; Wang, F.; Shen, Y.; Dai, S. CLEVER-1 blockade reprograms TAMs to overcome anti-PD-1 resistance in gastric cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2025, 13, e013145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zeidan, A.M.; Giagounidis, A.; Sekeres, M.A.; Xiao, Z.; Sanz, G.F.; Hoef, M.V.; Ma, F.; Hertle, S.; Santini, V. STIMULUS-MDS2 design and rationale: A phase III trial with the anti-TIM-3 sabatolimab (MBG453) + azacitidine in higher risk MDS and CMML-2. Future Oncol. 2023, 19, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Buecklein, V.L.; Warm, M.; Spiekermann, K.; Schmidt, C.; Unterhalt, M.; Daver, N.; Subklewe, M. Trial in Progress: An Open-Label Phase II Study of Relatlimab with Nivolumab in Combination with 5-Azacytidine for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory and Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AARON). In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–13 December 2022; pp. 3227–3228. [Google Scholar]
  110. Mannis, G.N.; Aribi, A.; Dunavin, N.; Carraway, H.E.; Saultz, J.N.; Roboz, G.J.; Jonas, B.A.; Madanat, Y.F.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Jeyakumar, D.; et al. IO-202, a Novel Anti-LILRB4 Antibody, with Azacitidine for Hypomethylating Agent-Naive Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Phase 1b Expansion Cohort Results. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–10 December 2024; p. 1008. [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhao, X.; Lv, M.; Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.-Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Zheng, H.; Zhao, X.; Lin, X.; Huang, X.J. LILRB4 Synthetic T-Cell Receptor and Antigen Receptor-T (STAR-T) for Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: First-in-Human Phase I Clinical Trial. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–10 December 2024; p. 4831. [Google Scholar]
  112. Zeidan, A.; Stein, A.S.; Rimpiläinen, J.; Pyörälä, M.; Siitonen, T.; Ball, B.; Myllymäki, M.; Zeidner, J.; Searle, E.; Witherall, R.; et al. Efficacy, molecular and translational analysis of TP53-mutated HR-MDS with bexmarilimab and azacitidine: Updated results from the bexmab Phase 1/2 study. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, FL, USA, 6–9 December 2025; p. 236. [Google Scholar]
  113. Logtenberg, M.E.W.; Scheeren, F.A.; Schumacher, T.N. The CD47-SIRPalpha Immune Checkpoint. Immunity 2020, 52, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Matlung, H.L.; Szilagyi, K.; Barclay, N.A.; van den Berg, T.K. The CD47-SIRPalpha signaling axis as an innate immune checkpoint in cancer. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 276, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Majeti, R.; Chao, M.P.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Pang, W.W.; Jaiswal, S.; Gibbs, K.D., Jr.; van Rooijen, N.; Weissman, I.L. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell 2009, 138, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jaiswal, S.; Jamieson, C.H.; Pang, W.W.; Park, C.Y.; Chao, M.P.; Majeti, R.; Traver, D.; van Rooijen, N.; Weissman, I.L. CD47 is upregulated on circulating hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell 2009, 138, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Marra, A.; Akarca, A.U.; Martino, G.; Ramsay, A.; Ascani, S.; Perriello, V.M.; O’Nions, J.; Wilson, A.J.; Gupta, R.; Childerhouse, A.; et al. CD47 expression in acute myeloid leukemia varies according to genotype. Haematologica 2023, 108, 3491–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Daver, N.; Vyas, P.; Huls, G.; Dohner, H.; Maury, S.; Novak, J.; Papayannidis, C.; Martinez Chamorro, C.; Montesinos, P.; Niroula, R.; et al. The ENHANCE-3 study: Venetoclax and azacitidine plus magrolimab or placebo for untreated AML unfit for intensive therapy. Blood 2025, 146, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Garcia-Manero, G.; Daver, N.G.; Xu, J.; Chao, M.; Chung, T.; Tan, A.; Wang, V.; Wei, A.; Vyas, P.; Sallman, D.A. Magrolimab + azacitidine versus azacitidine + placebo in untreated higher risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): The phase 3, randomized, ENHANCE study. In Proceedings of the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting I, Virtual, 4–8 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
  120. Zeidner, J.F.; Sallman, D.A.; Recher, C.; Daver, N.G.; Leung, A.Y.H.; Hiwase, D.K.; Subklewe, M.; Pabst, T.; Montesinos, P.; Larson, R.A.; et al. Magrolimab plus azacitidine vs physician’s choice for untreated TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: The ENHANCE-2 study. Blood 2025, 146, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ehninger, A.; Kramer, M.; Rollig, C.; Thiede, C.; Bornhauser, M.; von Bonin, M.; Wermke, M.; Feldmann, A.; Bachmann, M.; Ehninger, G.; et al. Distribution and levels of cell surface expression of CD33 and CD123 in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2014, 4, e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liu, J.; Tong, J.; Yang, H. Targeting CD33 for acute myeloid leukemia therapy. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Appelbaum, F.R.; Bernstein, I.D. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017, 130, 2373–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Castaigne, S.; Pautas, C.; Terre, C.; Raffoux, E.; Bordessoule, D.; Bastie, J.N.; Legrand, O.; Thomas, X.; Turlure, P.; Reman, O.; et al. Effect of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on survival of adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia (ALFA-0701): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2012, 379, 1508–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Tang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, Z.; Nalin, A.P.; Dai, H.; Xu, T.; Yin, J.; You, F.; Zhu, M.; Shen, W.; et al. First-in-man clinical trial of CAR NK-92 cells: Safety test of CD33-CAR NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Shah, N.N.; Azzi, J.; Cooper, B.; Deol, A.; DiPersio, J.F.; Koura, D.; Magenau, J.; McClune, B.; Muffly, L.S.; Mushtaq, M.U.; et al. Trial in Progress: Phase 1/2 Study of Donor-Derived Anti-CD33 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Expressing T Cells (VCAR33) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. In Proceedings of the ASTCT and CIBMTR, San Antonio, TX, USA, 21–24 February 2024; pp. S225–S226. [Google Scholar]
  127. Lee, H.K.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Choi, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Choi, E.; Park, S.W.; Chun, K.; Lee, K. Abstract 382: TRX-214-1002, An antibody drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD33 with a novel GSPT1 molecular glue for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. In Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research, Chicago, IL, USA, 25–30 April 2025; p. 382. [Google Scholar]
  128. El Achi, H.; Dupont, E.; Paul, S.; Khoury, J.D. CD123 as a Biomarker in Hematolymphoid Malignancies: Principles of Detection and Targeted Therapies. Cancers 2020, 12, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Testa, U.; Pelosi, E.; Frankel, A. CD 123 is a membrane biomarker and a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies. Biomark. Res. 2014, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Santos Azevedo, R.; Wang, S.A.; Daver, N.G.; Pemmaraju, N.; Kadia, T.M.; Issa, G.C.; Yilmaz, M.; Borthakur, G.; Jen, W.Y.; Short, N.J.; et al. CD123 expression and its correlation with mutation profile in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, e18524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Tiu, B.C.; Su, C.J.; Martin, E.C.S.; SOak, J.S.; Zhang, T.Y.; Mannis, G.N. Prognostic Significance of CD123 Expression in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agents. Blood 2024, 144, 6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Montesinos, P.; Roboz, G.J.; Bulabois, C.E.; Subklewe, M.; Platzbecker, U.; Ofran, Y.; Papayannidis, C.; Wierzbowska, A.; Shin, H.J.; Doronin, V.; et al. Safety and efficacy of talacotuzumab plus decitabine or decitabine alone in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not eligible for chemotherapy: Results from a multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 study. Leukemia 2021, 35, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Garcia-Manero, G.; Diez-Campelo, M.; Vellenga, E.; Jacoby, M.A.; Merchan, B.; Breems, D.; Cortelezzi, A.; Doronin, V.; Gomez, V.; Beckers, M.; et al. Daratumumab in transfusion-dependent patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 96, E111–E114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kubasch, A.S.; Schulze, F.; Giagounidis, A.; Gotze, K.S.; Kronke, J.; Sockel, K.; Middeke, J.M.; Chermat, F.; Gloaguen, S.; Puttrich, M.; et al. Single agent talacotuzumab demonstrates limited efficacy but considerable toxicity in elderly high-risk MDS or AML patients failing hypomethylating agents. Leukemia 2020, 34, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Uy, G.L.; Aldoss, I.; Foster, M.C.; Sayre, P.H.; Wieduwilt, M.J.; Advani, A.S.; Godwin, J.E.; Arellano, M.L.; Sweet, K.L.; Emadi, A.; et al. Flotetuzumab as salvage immunotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2021, 137, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Nguyen, D.; Ravandi, F.; Wang, S.A.; Jorgensen, J.L.; Wang, W.; Loghavi, S.; Lee, J.; Bachireddy, P.; DiNardo, C.D.; Chien, K.S.; et al. Updated Results from a Phase II Study of Vibecotamab, a CD3-CD123 Bispecific T-Cell Engaging Antibody, for MDS or CMML after Hypomethylating Failure and in MRD-Positive AML. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–10 December 2024; p. 1007. [Google Scholar]
  137. Daver, N.; Pemmaraju, N.; Sekeres, M.A.; Fathi, A.T.; Lane, A.A.; Compagnoni, A.; Gupta, I.; Tosolini, A.; Garzon, J.; Kantarjian, H.M. Phase 2 Multicenter Trial of Tagraxofusp in Combination with Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Adults with Previously Untreated CD123+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–10 December 2024; p. 4265.4261. [Google Scholar]
  138. Schmitt, N.; Siegler, J.J.; Beck, A.; Muller, T.; Kozlowska, I.; Sarlang, S.; Reusch, U.; Knackmuss, S.; Medina-Echeverz, J.; Koch, J.; et al. The bispecific innate cell engager AFM28 eliminates CD123+ leukemic stem and progenitor cells in AML and MDS. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 7793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Daver, N.G.; Montesinos, P.; DeAngelo, D.J.; Wang, E.S.; Papadantonakis, N.; Todisco, E.; Sweet, K.L.; Pemmaraju, N.; Lane, A.A.; Torres-Minana, L.; et al. Pivekimab sunirine (IMGN632), a novel CD123-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: A phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wermke, M.; Kraus, S.; Ehninger, A.; Bargou, R.C.; Goebeler, M.E.; Middeke, J.M.; Kreissig, C.; von Bonin, M.; Koedam, J.; Pehl, M.; et al. Proof of concept for a rapidly switchable universal CAR-T platform with UniCAR-T-CD123 in relapsed/refractory AML. Blood 2021, 137, 3145–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wu, H.; Shafiei, F.S.; Taghinejad, Z.; Maleknia, M.; Noormohamadi, H.; Raoufi, A.; Nouri, S.; Servatian, N.; Soleimani Samarkhazan, H. CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies in AML: Breaking barriers and charting the future. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 23, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lowther, D.E.; Goods, B.A.; Lucca, L.E.; Lerner, B.A.; Raddassi, K.; van Dijk, D.; Hernandez, A.L.; Duan, X.; Gunel, M.; Coric, V.; et al. PD-1 marks dysfunctional regulatory T cells in malignant gliomas. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e85935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tu, J.F.; Ding, Y.H.; Ying, X.H.; Wu, F.Z.; Zhou, X.M.; Zhang, D.K.; Zou, H.; Ji, J.S. Regulatory T cells, especially ICOS+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, are increased in the hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment and predict reduced survival. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Vadakekolathu, J.; Altmann, H.; Wobus, M.; von Bonin, M.; Schmitz, M.; Baretton, G.B.; Zeiser, R.; Bornhauser, M.; Rutella, S. Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Unveils Unique T-Cell Dysfunctional States and Prognostic Gene Expression Signatures in TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. In Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–12 December 2023; p. 291. [Google Scholar]
  145. Caiado, F.; Pietras, E.M.; Manz, M.G. Inflammation as a regulator of hematopoietic stem cell function in disease, aging, and clonal selection. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20201541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Veglia, F.; Sanseviero, E.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the era of increasing myeloid cell diversity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mao, Y.; Poschke, I.; Wennerberg, E.; Pico de Coana, Y.; Egyhazi Brage, S.; Schultz, I.; Hansson, J.; Masucci, G.; Lundqvist, A.; Kiessling, R. Melanoma-educated CD14+ cells acquire a myeloid-derived suppressor cell phenotype through COX-2-dependent mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 3877–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Movahedi, K.; Guilliams, M.; Van den Bossche, J.; Van den Bergh, R.; Gysemans, C.; Beschin, A.; De Baetselier, P.; Van Ginderachter, J.A. Identification of discrete tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cell subpopulations with distinct T cell-suppressive activity. Blood 2008, 111, 4233–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Nagaraj, S.; Nelson, A.; Youn, J.I.; Cheng, P.; Quiceno, D.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells regulate function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer via retrograde MHC class II signaling. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Youn, J.I.; Nagaraj, S.; Collazo, M.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 5791–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Hu, C.E.; Gan, J.; Zhang, R.D.; Cheng, Y.R.; Huang, G.J. Up-regulated myeloid-derived suppressor cell contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma development by impairing dendritic cell function. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 46, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Li, H.; Han, Y.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, M.; Cao, X. Cancer-expanded myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce anergy of NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-beta 1. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lindau, D.; Gielen, P.; Kroesen, M.; Wesseling, P.; Adema, G.J. The immunosuppressive tumour network: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and natural killer T cells. Immunology 2013, 138, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wu, Y.; Yi, M.; Niu, M.; Mei, Q.; Wu, K. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: An emerging target for anticancer immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Alhajahjeh, A.; Stahl, M.; Kim, T.K.; Kewan, T.; Stempel, J.M.; Zeidan, A.M.; Bewersdorf, J.P. Contemporary understanding of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) tumor microenvironment. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2025, 25, 435–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, H.; Tao, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, H.; Zhou, M.; Dong, Y.; Zhai, Z. Circulating Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Are Elevated and Associated with Poor Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 7363084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kapor, S.; Radojkovic, M.; Santibanez, J.F. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: Implication in myeloid malignancies and immunotherapy. Acta Histochem. 2024, 126, 152183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Weinhauser, I.; Pereira-Martins, D.A.; Almeida, L.Y.; Hilberink, J.R.; Silveira, D.R.A.; Quek, L.; Ortiz, C.; Araujo, C.L.; Bianco, T.M.; Lucena-Araujo, A.; et al. M2 macrophages drive leukemic transformation by imposing resistance to phagocytosis and improving mitochondrial metabolism. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadf8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Xu, Z.J.; Gu, Y.; Wang, C.Z.; Jin, Y.; Wen, X.M.; Ma, J.C.; Tang, L.J.; Mao, Z.W.; Qian, J.; Lin, J. The M2 macrophage marker CD206: A novel prognostic indicator for acute myeloid leukemia. Oncoimmunology 2020, 9, 1683347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Griffiths, E.A.; Gore, S.D.; Hooker, C.; McDevitt, M.A.; Karp, J.E.; Smith, B.D.; Mohammad, H.P.; Ye, Y.; Herman, J.G.; Carraway, H.E. Acute myeloid leukemia is characterized by Wnt pathway inhibitor promoter hypermethylation. Leuk. Lymphoma 2010, 51, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Valencia, A.; Roman-Gomez, J.; Cervera, J.; Such, E.; Barragan, E.; Bolufer, P.; Moscardo, F.; Sanz, G.F.; Sanz, M.A. Wnt signaling pathway is epigenetically regulated by methylation of Wnt antagonists in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2009, 23, 1658–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jiang, X.; Mak, P.Y.; Mu, H.; Tao, W.; Mak, D.H.; Kornblau, S.; Zhang, Q.; Ruvolo, P.; Burks, J.K.; Zhang, W.; et al. Disruption of Wnt/beta-Catenin Exerts Antileukemia Activity and Synergizes with FLT3 Inhibition in FLT3-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2417–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gruszka, A.M.; Valli, D.; Alcalay, M. Wnt Signalling in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Cells 2019, 8, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yuan, Y.; Wu, D.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, C.; Nie, X.; Zhao, Z.; Hou, J. Wnt signaling: Modulating tumor-associated macrophages and related immunotherapeutic insights. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2024, 223, 116154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mueller, J.; Schimmer, R.R.; Koch, C.; Schneiter, F.; Fullin, J.; Lysenko, V.; Pellegrino, C.; Klemm, N.; Russkamp, N.; Myburgh, R.; et al. Targeting the mevalonate or Wnt pathways to overcome CAR T-cell resistance in TP53-mutant AML cells. EMBO Mol. Med. 2024, 16, 445–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wagstaff, M.; Coke, B.; Hodgkiss, G.R.; Morgan, R.G. Targeting beta-catenin in acute myeloid leukaemia: Past, present, and future perspectives. Biosci. Rep. 2022, 42, BSR20211841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Jing, J.; Wu, Z.; Wang, J.; Luo, G.; Lin, H.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, C. Hedgehog signaling in tissue homeostasis, cancers, and targeted therapies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Lainez-Gonzalez, D.; Serrano-Lopez, J.; Alonso-Dominguez, J.M. Understanding the Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: A Necessary Step toward a Cure. Biology 2021, 10, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Petty, A.J.; Dai, R.; Lapalombella, R.; Baiocchi, R.A.; Benson, D.M.; Li, Z.; Huang, X.; Yang, Y. Hedgehog-induced PD-L1 on tumor-associated macrophages is critical for suppression of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cell function. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e146707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Petty, A.J.; Li, A.; Wang, X.; Dai, R.; Heyman, B.; Hsu, D.; Huang, X.; Yang, Y. Hedgehog signaling promotes tumor-associated macrophage polarization to suppress intratumoral CD8+ T cell recruitment. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 5151–5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ching, K.A.; Huang, D.; Wang, K.; Ozeck, M.; Lira, P.; Gao, J.; Bienkowska, J.; Rejto, P.; Hardwick, J.; O’Brien, T.; et al. Abstract LB-215: Analysis of mutations associated with response to glasdegib in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–18 April 2018; p. LB-215. [Google Scholar]
  172. Vadakekolathu, J.; Lai, C.; Reeder, S.; Church, S.E.; Hood, T.; Lourdusamy, A.; Rettig, M.P.; Aldoss, I.; Advani, A.S.; Godwin, J.; et al. TP53 abnormalities correlate with immune infiltration and associate with response to flotetuzumab immunotherapy in AML. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 5011–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sekeres, M.A.; Montesinos, P.; Novak, J.; Wang, J.; Jeyakumar, D.; Tomlinson, B.; Mayer, J.; Jou, E.; Robak, T.; Taussig, D.C.; et al. Glasdegib plus intensive or non-intensive chemotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia: Results from the randomized, phase 3 BRIGHT AML 1019 trial. Leukemia 2023, 37, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Di Francesco, B.; Verzella, D.; Capece, D.; Vecchiotti, D.; Di Vito Nolfi, M.; Flati, I.; Cornice, J.; Di Padova, M.; Angelucci, A.; Alesse, E.; et al. NF-kappaB: A Druggable Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers 2022, 14, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Carra, G.; Lingua, M.F.; Maffeo, B.; Taulli, R.; Morotti, A. P53 vs NF-κB: The role of nuclear factor-kappa B in the regulation of p53 activity and vice versa. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4449–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Haselager, M.; Thijssen, R.; West, C.; Young, L.; Van Kampen, R.; Willmore, E.; Mackay, S.; Kater, A.; Eldering, E. Regulation of Bcl-XL by non-canonical NF-kappaB in the context of CD40-induced drug resistance in CLL. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 1658–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Aplenc, R.; Meshinchi, S.; Sung, L.; Alonzo, T.; Choi, J.; Fisher, B.; Gerbing, R.; Hirsch, B.; Horton, T.; Kahwash, S.; et al. Bortezomib with standard chemotherapy for children with acute myeloid leukemia does not improve treatment outcomes: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Haematologica 2020, 105, 1879–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Naji, N.S.; Pasca, S.; Chatzilygeroudi, T.; Toledano-Sanz, P.; Rimando, J.; An, Y.; Hemani, Y.; Perkins, B.; Zeng, X.; Talbot, C., Jr.; et al. C-C motif chemokine receptor-like 2 promotes the interferon-gamma signaling response in myeloid neoplasms with erythroid differentiation and mutated TP53. Haematologica 2025. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  179. Naji, N.S.; Ahmedna, T.; Peske, J.D.; Zeng, X.; Perkins, B.; Thompson, Z.; Nichakawade, T.D.; Lee, B.S.; Watson, E.; Chatzilygeroudi, T.; et al. A PBD-dimer containing antibody drug conjugate targeting CCRL2 for high-risk MDS/AML. bioRxiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bailey, C.; Zhang, H.; He, M.; Sun, D.; Zhang, P.; Parkin, B.; Baer, M.R.; Zheng, P.; et al. Therapeutic targeting of TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia by inhibiting HIF-1alpha with echinomycin. Oncogene 2020, 39, 3015–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Roboz, G.J.; Ritchie, E.K.; Dault, Y.; Lam, L.; Marshall, D.C.; Cruz, N.M.; Hsu, H.C.; Hassane, D.C.; Christos, P.J.; Ippoliti, C.; et al. Phase I trial of plerixafor combined with decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2018, 103, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Xia, Z.; Tan, M.M.; Wong, W.W.; Dimitroulakos, J.; Minden, M.D.; Penn, L.Z. Blocking protein geranylgeranylation is essential for lovastatin-induced apoptosis of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia 2001, 15, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Noura, M.; Shoji, K.; Nobe, M.; Ishikawa, M.; Tanaka, M.; Okayama, A.; Adachi, S.; Matsuo, H. Statins induce monocytic differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia cells through the KLF4/DPYSL2A axis. FEBS Open Bio 2025, 15, 2021–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chiarella, E.; Nistico, C.; Di Vito, A.; Morrone, H.L.; Mesuraca, M. Targeting of Mevalonate-Isoprenoid Pathway in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Bisphosphonate Drugs. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Skuli, S.J.; Bakayoko, A.; Kruidenier, M.; Manning, B.; Pammer, P.; Salimov, A.; Riley, O.; Brake-Silla, G.; Dopkin, D.; Bowman, M.; et al. Chemoresistance of TP53 mutant acute myeloid leukemia requires the mevalonate byproduct, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, for induction of an adaptive stress response. Leukemia 2025, 39, 2087–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Afzal, A.; Fiala, M.A.; Jacoby, M.A.; Walter, M.J. Statin use in myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with a better survival and decreased progression to leukemia. Blood Adv. 2023, 7, 3838–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Brem, E.A.; Shieh, K.; Juarez, D.; Buono, R.; Jeyakumar, D.; O’Brien, S.; Taylor, T.H.; Fruman, D.A. A phase 1 study adding pitavastatin to venetoclax therapy in AML and CLL/SLL: A mechanism-based drug repurposing strategy. Blood Neoplasia 2024, 1, 100036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Warburg, O.; Wind, F.; Negelein, E. The Metabolism of Tumors in the Body. J. Gen. Physiol. 1927, 8, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Chen, W.L.; Wang, J.H.; Zhao, A.H.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.H.; Chen, T.L.; Li, J.M.; Mi, J.Q.; Zhu, Y.M.; Liu, Y.F.; et al. A distinct glucose metabolism signature of acute myeloid leukemia with prognostic value. Blood 2014, 124, 1645–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Wang, Y.H.; Scadden, D.T. Targeting the Warburg effect for leukemia therapy: Magnitude matters. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 2015, 2, e981988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Yang, Y.; Pu, J.; Yang, Y. Glycolysis and chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Xu, Y.; Hino, C.; Baylink, D.J.; Xiao, J.; Reeves, M.E.; Zhong, J.F.; Mirshahidi, S.; Cao, H. Vitamin D activates FBP1 to block the Warburg effect and modulate blast metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia. Biomark. Res. 2022, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Benajiba, L.; Alexe, G.; Su, A.; Raffoux, E.; Soulier, J.; Hemann, M.T.; Hermine, O.; Itzykson, R.; Stegmaier, K.; Puissant, A. Creatine kinase pathway inhibition alters GSK3 and WNT signaling in EVI1-positive AML. Leukemia 2019, 33, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Fenouille, N.; Bassil, C.F.; Ben-Sahra, I.; Benajiba, L.; Alexe, G.; Ramos, A.; Pikman, Y.; Conway, A.S.; Burgess, M.R.; Li, Q.; et al. The creatine kinase pathway is a metabolic vulnerability in EVI1-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. NIAID Visual & Medical Arts. Available online: https://bioart.niaid.nih.gov/ (accessed on 15 December 2025).
Figure 1. The main domains of the p53 protein.
Figure 1. The main domains of the p53 protein.
Cancers 18 00275 g001
Table 1. Agents currently being evaluated in preclinical or clinical trial settings.
Table 1. Agents currently being evaluated in preclinical or clinical trial settings.
Therapy TypeTargetDrugPhaseTrial NumberResult
p53 “targeted” MDM2Idasanutlin
Alrizomadlin
Phase III
Phase I/II
NCT02545283
NCT04358393
Terminated, futility
Recruiting
p53 “refolding”Eprenetapopt
APR-548
Phase III
Phase I
NCT03745716
NCT04638309
Completed, no results
Terminated, per sponsor
Arsenic trioxidePhase IIINCT03377725Withdrawn
Immune checkpoint inhibitorsPD-L1Pembrolizumab
Nivolumab
Phase II
Phase II
Phase II/III
NCT04214249
NCT04284787
NCT03092674
Completed, no results
Terminated, mortality
Terminated, mortality
PD-1DurvalumabPhase IINCT02775903Completed, no benefit
CTLA-4IpilimumabPhase IINCT02530463Completed
TIM-3SabatolimabPhase IIINCT04266301Terminated, futility
LAG-3RetlatimabPhase I/IINCT04913922Recruiting
Clever-1BexmarilimabPhase I/IINCT05428969Active, not recruiting
LILRB4IO-202
STAR-T
Phase I
Phase I
NCT04372433
NCT05548088
Completed
Completed
Other cell
-surface protein
targets
CD47MagrolimabPhase III
Phase III
Phase III
NCT04313881
NCT04778397
NCT05079230
Terminated, futility
CD33GO
CD33-GSPT1
CAR T-cells
CAR NK-cells
Phase III
Preclinical
Phase I/II
Preclinical
NCT00927498
N/A
NCT05984199
N/A
FDA approved
N/A
Terminated, funding
N/A
CD123
CD123-CD3
CD123-CD16
Talacotuzumab
IMGN632
CAR T-cells
CAR NK-cells
Flotetuzumab
Vibecotamab
AFM28
Phase II/III
Phase I/II
Phase I
Phase I
Phase I/II
Phase II
Preclinical
NCT02472145
NCT03386513
NCT04230265
NCT02944162
NCT02152956
NCT05285813
N/A
Completed, no benefit
Active, not recruiting
Active, not recruiting
Safety data only
Completed, no benefit
Completed
N/A
Signal transduction pathwaysHedgehogGlasdegibPhase IIINCT03416179Completed, no benefit
WntPRI-724PreclinicalN/AN/A
NF-kBBortezomibPhase IIINCT01371981Completed, no benefit
CCRL2Anti-CCRL2-PBDPreclinicalN/AN/A
HIF-1α
CXCR4
Echinomycin
Plerixafor
Preclinical
Phase I
N/A
NCT01352650
N/A
Completed
Biologic pathwaysHMG-CoA reductasePitavastatin
HI-statins 1
Phase I
Phase II
NCT04512105
NCT05483010
Safety data only
Recruiting
 GlycolysisN/APreclinicalN/AN/A
1 HI-statins: atorvastatin and rosuvastatin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hunter, C.J.; Im, A.P.; Shallis, R.M. Marrow Microenvironmental Pathobiology and Therapeutic Opportunities for TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers 2026, 18, 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020275

AMA Style

Hunter CJ, Im AP, Shallis RM. Marrow Microenvironmental Pathobiology and Therapeutic Opportunities for TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers. 2026; 18(2):275. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hunter, Cameron J., Annie P. Im, and Rory M. Shallis. 2026. "Marrow Microenvironmental Pathobiology and Therapeutic Opportunities for TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia" Cancers 18, no. 2: 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020275

APA Style

Hunter, C. J., Im, A. P., & Shallis, R. M. (2026). Marrow Microenvironmental Pathobiology and Therapeutic Opportunities for TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers, 18(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop