Next Article in Journal
Current Management of Locally Advanced Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers: Clinical Evidence and Evolving Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Bone Union Failure After Frozen Autograft Reconstruction in Lower Limb Osteosarcoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

1
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
2
Mamata Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad 500090, India
3
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah 21499, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2025, 17(22), 3602; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223602 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 October 2025 / Revised: 3 November 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 7 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endometrial Cancer Therapy: Foundations and Future Directions)

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. The usual treatment, hysterectomy, results in complete infertility in women. For younger women who wish to preserve fertility, doctors sometimes use fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). However, the traditional criteria are limited to age, tumor features, and fertility goals. This review looks at how the integration of new molecular techniques can help improve patient selection and management. It aims to provide patients and doctors with a more personalized approach to treating early-stage endometrial cancer.

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common malignancy found among women. It is ranked as the 6th most common cancer among women and the 15th most common cancer globally. Increasing prevalence of several factors like obesity and other metabolic disorders have caused a growing trend of prevalence of endometrial cancer. The standard approach of treatment with excellent prognosis is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TH/BSO). However, due to its drawback of complete infertility, newer approaches of fertility-sparing approaches are emerging to combat this challenge. Clinicians must choose the most suitable candidates for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) using the present existing conventional criteria with regard to the patient’s age, tumor characteristics, and fertility goals. The limitations using the conventional criteria can be eliminated by refining the criteria with molecular prognostic factors to ease the candidate selection process for FSS. Methods: Relevant literature regarding molecular subtypes, hormone therapy sensitivity, clinical assessment, and guidelines pertaining to fertility preservation in EC were retrieved from several electronic databases and articles addressing the role of molecular profiling in predicting patient response, guiding patient selection, and/or informing the development of therapies for fertility preservation in early-stage EC, particularly in women of reproductive age were included. Primary focus was on areas of consensus, emerging trends, and evidence gaps that warrant further investigation. This review will assess the integration of molecular prognostic factors to refine the patient selection criteria and guide FSS in early-stage EC. We will present existing clinical criteria, ongoing clinical trials, limitations, and the advantages of integrating molecular data on patient selection, treatment safety, and fertility outcomes. Results: Four distinct molecular subtypes have been classified which includes POLE-mut, MMR-d, p53-abn and NSMP. POLE-mut subtype had excellent prognosis with >95% patients achieving complete remission with <2% recurrence rate followed by MMRd and NSMP with intermediate prognosis and lastly p53-abn with poor prognosis of 60-70% achieving complete remission and 30–40% having recurrence. The data highlights the clinical value of molecular classification in selecting appropriate candidates for fertility sparing surgery (FSS). Conclusions: There is a lack of integration of molecular subtypes for clinicians to choose candidates for FSS and this gap should be addressed. Further research must be performed to follow personalized medicine to refine their treatment plan.
Keywords: endometrial cancer; fertility sparing surgery; molecular prognosticators; fertility preservation endometrial cancer; fertility sparing surgery; molecular prognosticators; fertility preservation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaikh, S.; Haque, S.; Khalifey, H.T.; Samour, H.A.; Deed, A.; Mahereen, R.; Nabiha, N.; Shaikh, S.; Samhan, L.M.; Khan, M.I.; et al. Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers 2025, 17, 3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223602

AMA Style

Shaikh S, Haque S, Khalifey HT, Samour HA, Deed A, Mahereen R, Nabiha N, Shaikh S, Samhan LM, Khan MI, et al. Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers. 2025; 17(22):3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaikh, Saniyah, Salsabil Haque, Hafsah Tajammul Khalifey, Halla Anas Samour, Ayesha Deed, Rutaba Mahereen, Noor Nabiha, Safwaan Shaikh, Lara M. Samhan, Mohammed Imran Khan, and et al. 2025. "Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review" Cancers 17, no. 22: 3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223602

APA Style

Shaikh, S., Haque, S., Khalifey, H. T., Samour, H. A., Deed, A., Mahereen, R., Nabiha, N., Shaikh, S., Samhan, L. M., Khan, M. I., & Yaqinuddin, A. (2025). Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers, 17(22), 3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop