Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Follow-Up
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Cytology of Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis: Technique
2.3. Pathologic and Cytological Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analysis
2.5. Figures
2.6. Definition of Positivity
3. Results
3.1. First Cohort—Clinicopathological Characteristics
3.2. Diagnostic Value of Cytology of Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis
3.3. Second Cohort—Clinicopathological Characteristics
3.4. Diagnostic Value of Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis Cytology
3.5. Clinical Parameters Associated with a Higher Accuracy of Cytology of Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis in Both Cohorts
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ferlay, J.; Steliarova-Foucher, E.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Rosso, S.; Coebergh, J.W.W.; Comber, H.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 1374–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosentino, M.; Palou, J.; Gaya, J.M.; Breda, A.; Rodriguez-Faba, O.; Villavicencio-Mavrich, H. Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: Location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma. World J. Urol. 2013, 31, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, D.A.; Rink, M.; Xylinas, E.; Matin, S.F.; Stenzl, A.; Roupret, M.; Shariat, S.F. Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper tract: Disparate twins. J. Urol. 2013, 189, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwartz, C.B.; Bekirov, H.; Melman, A. Urothelial tumours of upper tract following treatment of primary bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Urology 1992, 40, 509–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shariat, S.F.; Favaretto, R.L.; Gupta, A.; Fritsche, H.-M.; Matsumoto, K.; Kassouf, W.; Novara, G. Gender differences in radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J. Urol. 2011, 29, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman, B.A.; Tran, V.-T.; Fradet, Y.; Lacombe, L. Carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: Predictors of survival and competing causes of mortality. Cancer 2009, 115, 2853–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeh, H.-C.; Jan, H.-C.; Wu, W.-J.; Li, C.-C.; Li, W.-M.; Ke, H.-L.; Huang, C.N. Concurrent preoperative presence of hydronephrosis and flank pain independently predicts worse outcome of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139624. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, N.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Wen, R.; Li, H. Microscopic hematuria predicts lower stage in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 4929–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raman, J.D.; Shariat, S.F.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Lotan, Y.; Sagalowsky, A.I.; Roscigno, M.; Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaborative Group. Does preoperative symptom classification impact prognosis in patients with clinically localized upper-tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy? Urol. Oncol. 2011, 29, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rouprêt, M.; Babjuk, M.; Compérat, E.; Zigeuner, R.; Sylvester, R.J.; Burger, M.; Shariat, S.F. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur. Urol. 2018, 73, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lughezzani, G.; Jeldres, C.; Isbarn, H.; Sun, M.; Shariat, S.F.; Widmer, H.; Karakiewicz, P.I. Temporal stage and grade migration in surgically treated patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2010, 105, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Browne, B.M.; Stensland, K.D.; Moynihan, M.J.; Canes, D. An analysis of staging and treatment trends for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the national cancer database. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, e743-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gakis, G.; Black, P.C.; Bochner, B.H.; Boorjian, S.A.; Stenzl, A.; Thalmann, G.N.; Kassouf, W. Systematic Review on the Fate of the Remnant Urothelium after Radical Cystectomy. Eur. Urol. 2017, 71, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fahmy, O.; Khairul-Asri, M.G.; Schubert, T.; Renninger, M.; Kübler, H.; Stenzl, A.; Gakis, G. Urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol. Oncol. 2018, 36, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiss, B.; Furrer, M.A.; Wuethrich, P.Y.; Burkhard, F.C.; Thalmann, G.N.; Roth, B. Stenting Prior to Cystectomy is an Independent Risk Factor for Upper Urinary Tract Recurrence. J. Urol. 2017, 198, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Picozzi, S.; Ricci, C.; Gaeta, M.; Ratti, D.; Macchi, A.; Casellato, S.; Carmignani, L. Upper urinary tract recurrence following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis on 13,185 patients. J. Urol. 2012, 188, 2046–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Messer, J.; Shariat, S.F.; Brien, J.C.; Herman, M.P.; Ng, C.K.; Scherr, D.S.; Raman, J.D. Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 2011, 108, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fromont, G.; Rouprêt, M.; Amira, N.; Sibony, M.; Vallancien, G.; Validire, P.; Cussenot, O. Tissue microarray analysis of the prognostic value of E-cadherin, Ki67, p53, p27, survivin and MSH2 expression in upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2005, 48, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Malm, C.; Grahn, A.; Jaremko, G.; Tribukait, B.; Brehmer, M. Diagnostic accuracy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: How samples are collected matters. Scand. J. Urol. 2017, 51, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouprêt, M.; Babjuk, M.; Compérat, E.; Zigeuner, R.; Sylvester, R.J.; Burger, M.; Shariat, S.F. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: 2015 update. Eur. Urol. 2015, 68, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessler, T.M.; Burkhard, F.C.; Studer, U.E. Clinical indications and outcomes with nerve-sparing cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2005, 32, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furrer, M.A.; Studer, U.E.; Gross, T.; Burkhard, F.C.; Thalmann, G.N.; Nguyen, D.P. Nerve-sparing radical cystectomy has a beneficial impact on urinary continence after orthotopic bladder substitution, which becomes even more apparent over time. BJU Int. 2018, 121, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furrer, M.A.; Papa, N.; Luetolf, S.; Roth, B.; Cumberbatch, M.; Dorin Vartolomei, M.; Kiss, B. A longitudinal study evaluating interim assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2022, 130, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furrer, M.A.; Grueter, T.; Bosshard, P.; Vartolomei, M.D.; Kiss, B.; Thalmann, G.N.; Roth, B. Routine Preoperative Bone Scintigraphy Has Limited Impact on the Management of Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur. Urol. Focus 2021, 7, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furrer, M.A.; Abgottspon, J.; Huber, M.; Engel, D.; Löffel, L.M.; Beilstein, C.M.; Wuethrich, P.Y. Perioperative continuation of aspirin, oral anticoagulants or bridging with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin does not increase intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion rate in cystectomy patients: An observational cohort study. BJU Int. 2022, 129, 512–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razavi, S.A.; Sadigh, G.; Kelly, A.M.; Cronin, P. Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for the diagnosis of upper and lower urinary tract malignancy: A critically appraised topic. Acad. Radiol. 2012, 19, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barkan, G.A.; Wojcik, E.M.; Nayar, R.; Savic-Prince, S.; Quek, M.L.; Kurtycz, D.F.I.; Rosenthal, D.L. The paris system for reporting urinary cytology: The quest to develop a standardized terminology. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2016, 23, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Humphrey, P.A.; Moch, H.; Cubilla, A.L.; Ulbright, T.M.; Reuter, V.E. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur. Urol. 2016, 70, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seisen, T.; Granger, B.; Colin, P.; Léon, P.; Utard, G.; Renard-Penna, R.; Roupret, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2015, 67, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyake, M.; Owari, T.; Hori, S.; Nakai, Y.; Fujimoto, K. Emerging biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of urothelial carcinoma. Res. Rep. Urol. 2018, 10, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lodde, M.; Mian, C.; Wiener, H.; Haitel, A.; Pycha, A.; Marberger, M. Detection of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma with ImmunoCyt: A preliminary report. Urology 2001, 58, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marín-Aguilera, M.; Mengual, L.; Ribal, M.J.; Musquera, M.; Ars, E.; Villavicencio, H.; Alcaraz, A. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2007, 51, 409–415, discussion 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coskuner, E.; Cevik, I.; Ozkan, A.; Dillioglugil, O.; Akdas, A. In the cystoscopic follow-up of non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma, NMP-22 works for high grades, but unreliable in low grades and upper urinary tract tumours. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2012, 44, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walsh, I.K.; Keane, P.F.; Ishak, L.M.; Flessland, K.A. The BTA stat test: A tumour marker for the detection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology 2001, 58, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, H.-H.; Ke, H.-L.; Hsiao, K.-H.; Tsai, C.-W.; Wu, W.-J.; Bau, D.-T.; Chang, L.L. CCND1 1722 polymorphism and potential relevance to upper tract urothelial cancer. Anticancer. Res. 2011, 31, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, K.; Liu, T.; Ge, N.; Liu, L.; Yuan, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, D. TERT promoter mutations are associated with distant metastases in upper tract urothelial carcinomas serve as urinary biomarkers detected by a sensitive, c.a.s.t.P.C.R. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 12428–12439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monteiro-Reis, S.; Leça, L.; Almeida, M.; Antunes, L.; Monteiro, P.; Dias, P.C.; Jerónimo, C. Accurate detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in tissue and urine by means of quantitative GDF15, TMEFF2 and VIM promoter methylation. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witjes, J.A.; Morote, J.; Cornel, E.B.; Gakis, G.; van Valenberg, F.J.P.; Lozano, F.; Leibovitch, I. Performance of the Bladder EpiCheckTM Methylation Test for Patients Under Surveillance for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Blinded Clinical Trial. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2018, 1, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smentkowski, K.E.; Bagley, D.H.; Hubosky, S.G. Ureteroscopic biopsy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and role of urinary biomarkers. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2020, 9, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brimo, F.; Xu, B.; Kassouf, W.; Ahmadi-Kaliji, B.; Charbonneau, M.; Nahal, A.; Auger, M. Urine cytology: Does the number of atypical urothelial cells matter? A qualitative and quantitative study of 112 cases. J. Am. Soc. Cytopathol. 2015, 4, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
High-Grade UC | Atypical Urothelial Cells, Suspicious for High-Grade UC, Low-Grade Urothelial Neoplasia | Negative for High-Grade UC | |
---|---|---|---|
Stringent criteria | + | - | - |
Soft criteria | + | + | - |
Patient data (n = 25) | |||
Age (median, range) at surgery [years] | 66 (81–44) | ||
Female/male, n (%) | 8 (32%)/17 (68%) | ||
Follow-up (median, range) [months] | 24.5 (2–95) | ||
Diagnostic data | |||
Pelvic–calyceal/ureter location, n (%) | 15 (60%)/7 (28%) | ||
Multifocality, n (%) | 3 (12%) | ||
Hydronephrosis, n (%) | 14 (56%) | ||
Selective cytology, n (%) | 20 (80%) | ||
High-grade/atypia, suspicious, low-grade/negative | 7 (35%)/9 (45%)/4 (20%) | ||
URS biopsy, n (%) | 12 (48%) | ||
Surgery data | |||
≤pT2/>pT2, n (%) | 12 (48%)/13 (52%) | ||
Concomitant carcinoma in situ, n (%) | 8 (32%) | ||
High-grade/Low-grade, n (%) | 23 (92%)/2 (8%) | ||
pN0/pN+, n (%) | 20 (80%)/5 (20%) | ||
Positive surgical margins, n (%) | 1 (4%) | ||
Chemotherapy | |||
Neoadjuvant/adjuvant, n (%) | 0 (0%)/1 (4%) | ||
Recurrence | |||
Extra-vesical/vesical, n (%) | 7 (28%)/15 (60%) | ||
Outcomes | |||
3 yr overall survival (%) | 71 | ||
3 yr cancer-specific survival (%) | 82 |
Patient data (n = 689) | ||
Age (median, range) at surgery [years] | 68 (30–89) | |
Female/male, n (%) | 201 (29%)/488 (71%) | |
Follow-up (median, range) [months] | 37.5 (0.3–212) | |
Diagnostic data | ||
Synchronous UTUC, n (%) | 5 (1%) | |
Metachronous UTUC prior to RC, n (%) | 36 (5%) | |
Hydronephrosis, n (%) | 131 (19%) | |
Surgery data | ||
≤pT2/>pT2, n (%) | 510 (74%)/179 (26%) | |
High-grade/Low-grade | 625 (91%)/64 (9%) | |
Concomitant carcinoma in situ, n (%) | 280 (40%) | |
pN0/pN+, n (%) | 528 (77%)/161 (23%) | |
Median lymph nodes removed (median, IQR) | 33 (24–43) | |
Positive surgical margins, n (%) | 19 (3%) | |
Chemotherapy | ||
Neoadjuvant/adjuvant, n (%) | 118 (17%)/70 (10%) | |
Recurrence | ||
UTUC/local/distant, n (%) | 46 (7%)/92 (13%)/177 (26%) | |
Outcomes | ||
3-year overall survival (%) | 68 | |
3-year cancer-specific survival (%) | 90 | |
5 year overall survival (%) | 56 | |
5 year cancer-specific survival (%) | 76 |
Diagnostic Workup | n = 46 | |
---|---|---|
Forced diuresis performed, n (%) | 31 (67) | |
True-positive, n (%) | 17 (55) | |
False-negative, n (%) | 14 (45) | |
Diagnostic tool revealing UUT recurrence | ||
Forced diuresis only, n (%) | 2 (4) | |
Forced diuresis and CT, n (%) | 13 (28) | |
Forced diuresis and invasive workup | 2 (4) | |
(selective ureteral cytologies and ureteroscopy with biopsy) | ||
No forced diuresis performed | 15 (33) | |
CT, n (%) | 27 (59) | |
Invasive workup | 1 (2) | |
(selective ureteral cytologies and ureteroscopy with biopsy) | ||
Incidental finding (resection of uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture) | 1 (2) | |
Treatment | n = 46 | |
BCG only | 4 (9) | |
BCG and subsequent NUT (for second recurrence) | 1 (2) | |
Laser treatment and adjuvant farmorubicin instillation | 6 (13) | |
Laser treatment and subsequent nephroureterectomy (for second recurrence) | 2 (4) | |
NUT and lymph node dissection | 15 (33) | |
Distal ureteric/ureteroileal anastomotic resection | 4 (9) | |
Palliative chemotherapy | 9 (20) | |
Palliative radiotherapy | 1 (2) | |
Best supportive care | 4 (9) | |
Histopathological features | n = 44 | |
T stage | ||
Ta | 10 (23) | |
T1 | 8 (18) | |
T2 | 3 (7) | |
T3 | 14 (32) | |
T4 | 1 (2) | |
CIS only | 8 (18) | |
Grade | ||
G1 | 2 (4) | |
G2 | 8 (18) | |
G3 | 34 (77) |
Entire Cohort (n = 689) | Muscle-Invasive Disease (n = 510) | Non-Muscle-Invasive Disease (n = 179) | Concomitant Carcinoma In Situ (n = 280) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | 60% (42–76%) | 50% (31–69%) | 82% (48–97%) | 75% (51–90%) |
Specificity | 99% (97–99%) | 99% (98–100%) | 98% (94–99%) | 98% (95–99%) |
PPV | 70% (50–85%) | 71% (44–89%) | 69% (39–90%) | 75% (51–90%) |
NPV | 98% (96–99%) | 98% (96–99%) | 99% (95–100%) | 98% (95–99%) |
Youden’s index | 0.59 (0.42–0.75) | 0.49 (0.29–0.69) | 0.79 (0.57–1) | 0.73 (0.54–0.92) |
UCFD-Positive (n = 2) | UCFD-Negative (n = 23) | p Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | ||||
Hydronephrosis (n) | 0 (0%) | 13 (56%) | 0.22 | |
Smoking history positive (n) | 2 (100%) | 5 (22%) | 0.07 | |
Pelvic–calyceal/ureter location (n) | 2 (100%)/0 (0%) | 13 (56%)/7 (30%) | 0.50/1.00 | |
Selective ureter cytology positive (n) | 2 (100%) | 5 (22%) | 0.07 | |
Preoperative eGFR > 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 2 (100%) | 6 (26%) | 0.09 | |
Variant histology | 1 (sarcomatoid) (50%) | 0 (0%) | 0.08 | |
Postoperative | ||||
pN+ | 1 (50%) | 4 (17%) | 0.36 | |
Bladder recurrence | 2 (100%) | 13 (56%) | 0.50 |
Univariate Analysis for Sensitivity (p-Value) | Univariate Analysis for Specificity (p-Value) | |
---|---|---|
Lymph node metastasis | 0.48 | 0.36 |
Muscle invasion | 0.16 | 0.36 |
Positive surgical margin | 0.39 | >0.99 |
Nephrostomy insertion preoperatively | 0.26 | 0.93 |
Stent insertion preoperatively | 0.39 | 0.85 |
Upper urinary tract cancer prior to radical cystectomy | 0.06 | 0.65 |
Recurrent bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy | 0.26 | >0.99 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Giudici, N.; Blarer, J.; Sathianathen, N.; Burkhard, F.C.; Wuethrich, P.Y.; Thalmann, G.N.; Seiler, R.; Furrer, M.A. Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Follow-Up. Cancers 2024, 16, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040758
Giudici N, Blarer J, Sathianathen N, Burkhard FC, Wuethrich PY, Thalmann GN, Seiler R, Furrer MA. Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Follow-Up. Cancers. 2024; 16(4):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040758
Chicago/Turabian StyleGiudici, Nicola, Jennifer Blarer, Niranjan Sathianathen, Fiona C. Burkhard, Patrick Y. Wuethrich, George N. Thalmann, Roland Seiler, and Marc A. Furrer. 2024. "Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Follow-Up" Cancers 16, no. 4: 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040758
APA StyleGiudici, N., Blarer, J., Sathianathen, N., Burkhard, F. C., Wuethrich, P. Y., Thalmann, G. N., Seiler, R., & Furrer, M. A. (2024). Diagnostic Value of Urine Cytology in Pharmacologically Forced Diuresis for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Follow-Up. Cancers, 16(4), 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040758