Next Article in Journal
Advancements in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Bladder Cancer: EV-302 and Checkmate-901 Insights and Future Directions
Previous Article in Journal
Dutch Translation of the Yost Self-Report Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire in Women
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 13
10.3390/cancers16132397
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A New Vista of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3): New Specific Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 Dependent Pathways in Glioblastoma, Mesothelioma and Other Cancers

by
Lorenzo Magrassi
1,2,*,
Giulia Pinton
3,
Sabino Luzzi
1,
Sergio Comincini
4,
Andrea Scravaglieri
1,
Valentina Gigliotti
3,
Bianca Laura Bernardoni
5,
Ilaria D’Agostino
5,
Francesca Juretich
3,
Concettina La Motta
5 and
Silvia Garavaglia
3
1
Neurosurgery, Dipartimento di Scienze Clinico-Chirurgiche e Pediatriche, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Istituto di Genetica Molecolare—CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
Department of Scienze del Farmaco, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Bovio 6, 28100 Novara, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
5
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2024, 16(13), 2397; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132397
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 25 June 2024 / Accepted: 27 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Drug Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Aldehyde dehydrogenases of the subfamily 1A (ALDH1A) are enzymes involved in the synthesis of retinoic acid, which is necessary for the normal development and maintenance of epithelia, reproduction, memory, and immune function in adults. ALDH1A3, one of the enzymes that belong to the ALD1A subfamily, is also expressed at high levels in many human cancers like glioblastoma and mesothelioma. Herein, we review the role of ALDH1A3 in cancer, showing its relation with excessive proliferation, chemoresistance, and invasiveness. We also illustrate the current attempts to develop ALDH1A3-selective inhibitors and specific fluorescent probes that are potentially useful for cancer therapy and fluorescence-guided tumor resection.

Abstract

Aldehyde dehydrogenases of the subfamily 1A (ALDH1A) are enzymes necessary for the oxidation of all-trans or 9-cis retinal to retinoic acid (RA). Retinoic acid and its derivatives are important for normal development and maintenance of epithelia, reproduction, memory, and immune function in adults. Moreover, in recent years, it has been demonstrated that ALDH1A members are also expressed and functional in several human cancers where their role is not limited to the synthesis of RA. Here, we review the current knowledge about ALDH1A3, one of the 1A isoforms, in cancers with an emphasis on two of the deadliest tumors that affect humans: glioblastoma multiforme and mesothelioma. In both tumors, ALDH1A3 is considered a negative prognostic factor, and its level correlates with excessive proliferation, chemoresistance, and invasiveness. We also review the recent attempts to develop both ALDH1A3-selective inhibitors for cancer therapy and ALDH1A3-specific fluorescent substrates for fluorescence-guided tumor resection.

1. Introduction

The multigene family of human aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) has 19 functional members that encode NAD(P)+-dependent enzymes devoted to the biotransformation and detoxification of multiple endogenous and exogenous aldehyde substrates [1,2]. Moreover, in the course of evolutionary history, several members of the ALDH superfamily have also acquired other enzymatic functions like esterase activity with a significant role in the bioactivation of nitrates but also non-enzymatic structural functions like acting as lens and corneal crystallins capable of quenching the effects of UV radiation [3].
Our review article is focused on the role in oncology of one important member of the ALDH1A subfamily, namely ALDH1A3. We also consider new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches based on the development of selective inhibitors and probes specific for ALDH1A3 [2,4].
The human ALDH1A subfamily encompasses three genes: ALDH1A1 located on chromosome 9q21.13, ALDH1A2 located on chromosome 15q21.3, and ALDH1A3 located on chromosome 15q26.3. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of vertebrate ALDH1A genes suggests that ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2 form a clade sister to ALDH1A3 [5], confirming the specificity of ALDH1A3. ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH1A3 have the lowest ratio of observed and expected variant numbers in the genome aggregation database (gnomAD) of all human ALDH genes. This suggests that, at least in humans, the genes of the ALDH1A subfamily have the lowest tolerance for loss-of-function mutations as compared to the gene members of the other ALDH subfamilies [1].
In mice, deletion of the Aldh1a1 gene is viable and fertile, and Aldh1a1-deleted mice are protected against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance [6]. On the contrary, genetic deletion of Aldh1a2 [7] is embryonically lethal, and Aldh1a3-deleted mice die at birth due to choanal atresia which is responsible for severe respiratory distress and inability to thrive leading to the death of the animals in the immediate post-partum period [8]. Most alterations in Aldh1a knockouts have been traced to a complete or relative lack of retinoic acid (RA) at the necessary time points and tissues during development [8,9].

2. Structure and Catalysis of ALDHs

Besides various functions and natural substrates, ALDH enzymes also share a significant amino acid sequence identity. By analyzing the protein primary structures, it has been demonstrated that ALDHs included in the superfamily usually share at least 15% of their sequence [10]. In addition, members of the ALDH superfamily are grouped into families and subfamilies whenever they share around 40% or 60% sequence identity [11,12].
All the structures obtained from crystallization studies showed that ALDH isoenzymes are functional when in dimeric or tetrameric form, depending on which class they belong to (Figure 1A), but globally, they share high structural homology in the monomer unit, which consists of three different domains: the coenzyme binding domain, the catalytic domain, and the oligomerization domain [13] (Figure 1B). The arrangement of these domains gives rise to a funnel-like passage ending in the catalytic site. The upper portion of the funnel-like passage provides the amino acid specificity to the substrate binding, and the highly conserved lower portion binds the cofactor allowing the hydride transfer from the substrate [14].
Overall, these enzymes share a number of highly conserved amino acid residues that take part in both the catalytic processes and the cofactor binding. The most relevant amino acids are Cys302 directly involved in the catalytic activity and Glu268 which acts as a base activating the hydrolytic water molecule. As customary, the reference number of amino acids is from the human ALDH2 sequence [11,14].
The irreversible conversion of aldehydes into carboxylic acids is a highly conserved process in all of the NAD(P)+-dependent ALDH enzymes. However, ALDH6A1 has coenzyme A (CoA) as the coenzyme, resulting in a CoA ester as its main product instead of a free carboxyl acid due to the cofactor reduction and its release before the deacylation step [14,15].
The more common NAD(P)+-dependent mechanism can be rationalized in six essential steps as shown in Figure 2.
The first step is the binding of NAD(P)+ to the corresponding site that strongly stabilizes the complex, induces a conformational change, and activates the nucleophile catalytic residue of Cys302 with a mechanism mediated by Glu268 and a water molecule. Then, the hydride transfer on the cofactor takes place from the thiohemiacetal intermediate, leading to the reduction of the coenzyme to form NAD(P)H. The enzyme is regenerated by the binding of a new molecule of NAD(P)+, and the reduced form of the substrate detaches from the binding site [13,16].

3. The Human Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A Subfamily

The ALDH1A subfamily comprises three different isoenzymes: ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH1A3 [13]. These proteins have the major task of regulating gene expression by controlling the oxidation of all-trans or 9-cis retinal to RA with high specificity. RA, through the binding to two different nuclear hormone receptors, namely retinoid-X receptors (RXRs) and retinoic acid receptors (RARs), plays a crucial role as a tissue differentiation factor for cellular development and morphogenesis. RA’s presence during the developmental processes in embryogenesis regulates neurogenesis, cardiogenesis, and the formation of the eyes and other organs, while also being involved in the cell–cell signaling networks between pluripotent cells [17]. Even though they share over 70% of their primary sequence and mostly recognize a common substrate, ALDH1A isoenzymes maintain separate patterns and substrate preferences, and this highlights the importance of these enzymes in gene expression, as they regulate over 530 genes through RA action [16,18]. In further detail, the isoform ALDH1A3 is a cytosolic homotetramer, and its mRNA can be found also in the nucleus and mitochondria. Each monomer shows a molecular weight close to 56 KDa and is able to catalyze a single oxidation of retinal to RA using NAD+ as a cofactor. This isoenzyme, like ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2, can catalyze both all-trans-retinal and 9-cis-retinal, but it shows a preferential catalytic activity towards all-trans-retinal that is considerably higher compared to ALDH1A1 [16,19]. ALDH1A3 is widely expressed in both embryonic and adult tissues, especially in the fetal nasal mucosa, salivary glands, stomach, kidneys, and breast. It is also involved in the development of several structures of the brain, from eyes and olfactory bulbs to the forebrain and the cerebral cortex [10]. Different studies reported how ALDH1A3 plays a crucial role in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in oxidizing acetaldehyde as a result of ethanol metabolism through alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH). In addition, ALDH1A3 even intervenes in amino acid metabolism, oxidizing the intermediate aldehydes that form from histidine, phenylalanine, β-alanine, and tyrosine. Finally, several aldehydes derived from lipid peroxidation and cytochrome-mediated metabolism of exogenous substances and drugs are detoxified by ALDH1A3, which contributes to a reduction in oxidative stress and damage. One of the most important tasks of this enzyme is regulating cell apoptosis. Indeed, it was demonstrated that in ALDH1A3-knockout mice, mitosis decreases, with RA inducing the expression of pro-apoptotic genes like caspase-7 and caspase-9 leading to apoptosis [19].

4. Structural Comparison between ALDH1A Isoenzymes

In order to understand the activity and function differences between the ALDH1A isoenzymes, a structural comparison could be useful. Analyzing the monomer structure of ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH1A3, a high level of amino acid sequence identity was confirmed. Specifically, the ALDH1A3 monomer shares 71% identity with ALDH1A1 and 72% with ALDH1A2.
In addition, several amino acid residues are conserved in the three isoforms, mainly Try189, Gly136, Leu185, Leu471, and Ala473, according to the ALDH1A3 sequence numbering. These amino acids establish van der Waals interactions with the natural ligand RA inside the catalytic site and are conserved in all three proteins. This can explain how RA is their main shared ligand (Figure 3A) [16]. The amino acids involved in the NAD+ cofactor binding site are all tightly conserved, both among proteins of the 1A subfamily and in all 19 human ALDH isoforms (Figure 3B). Aside from the proven conserved structure, it has been demonstrated that, especially in the catalytic domain and RA binding site, not all the residues are commonly shared through the isoenzymes. In particular, ALDH1A3 in its binding site located in the substrate access to catalytic pocket presents Phe131, Glu135, and Tyr472, which correspond to Leu 120, Ala 124, and Ser 461 in ALDH1A1 and Tyr137, Gln141, and Asn478 in ALDH1A2, respectively. In addition, in a comparison of ALDH1A3 and ALDH1A1 catalytic tunnel sequences, two significant differences were discovered: Thr315 and Asn469, fundamental in ALDH1A3, are replaced with Ile304 and Gly458 in ALDH1A1. These substitutions have been decisive in obtaining new pharmacological tools, fluorescent probes, and selective inhibitors of ALDH1A3 [4,20,21,22,23].

5. ALDH1A3 and Cancers

The proteins encoded by the ALDH1 subfamily play an important role in several human cancers [24]. A list of human tumors where ALDH1A3 expression has been implicated in the generation or growth of the neoplasm is provided in Table 1. Usually, increased ALDH1A3 expression in the tumor compared to that of the corresponding normal tissue indicates enhanced malignity or a worse prognosis (Table 1). However, there are exceptions like in melanoma [25] and non-small-cell lung cancer [26], where ALDH1A3 overexpression is associated with longer survival and a reduced incidence of metastasis.

6. ALDH1A3 in Glioma and Glioblastoma

According to the last revision of the Human Protein Atlas [43], all ALDH1A isoenzymes are expressed in the brain with low regional specificity; ALDH1A3 has a higher level of expression in the choroid plexus, but the protein is detectable in all regions of the brain. In the Human Protein Atlas, the levels of the ALDH1A isoenzymes are always not considered prognostic for glioma [43]. However, the same source indicates that lower mRNA levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A3 in high-grade gliomas are associated with an increased proportion of patients surviving more than 3 years [43].
In glioblastoma (GBM), like in many other tumors, ALDH1A3 expression was linked to tumor stem cells [44] and more specifically to cancer stem cells of GBM, with a transcriptomic signature indicated as mesenchymal [31]. Later studies based on multiple samples from the same tumor and single-cell RNA studies have shown that the different transcriptomic subtypes can coexist in the same tumor [45]. Moreover, the number of GBM transcriptomic patterns that show strong indications of representing antagonistic states has been reduced to two: proneural (or neural progenitor-like) and mesenchymal. These states dominate the patterns of phenotypic heterogeneity in GBM [45,46]. Mesenchymal GBM cells are more aggressive and less sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [47] and are characterized by an increase in ALDH1A3 levels [31,48,49]. Patients affected by GBM richer in cells with a mesenchymal transcriptional phenotype show earlier recurrences and have a shorter survival [20,50]. Tissue samples obtained from relapsing GBM, independent from their initial phenotype, contain a higher amount of cancer cells with a mesenchymal phenotype [51].
In GBM, ALDH1A-positive cells tend to be enriched in the invasive region of the tumor where glioma stem cell niches are more concentrated [50,52]. The presence of ALDH1A3-positive cancer stem cells is also instrumental in maintaining hypervascularization of the stem cell niches by paracrine release of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and interleukin-8, which stimulate neovasculogenesis [53].
The treatment of GBM patients with temozolomide (TMZ), the mainstream drug used for the treatment of human GBM, is invariably followed by the selection of cells that are resistant to TMZ. Although the level of ALDH1A3 is lower in TMZ-resistant GBM cells than in cells sensitive to TMZ, the enzyme is still detectable and contributes to the survival of those cells [54,55].
In recurrent GBM tissue that is often largely composed of cells with a mesenchymal phenotype [51], the level of ALDH1A3 is increased [55]. This suggests that ALDH1A3 may be a useful pharmacological target in order to develop therapeutic options for GBM patients whose ominous prognosis is tightly linked with the ability of GBM to relapse [56].
Overexpression of ALDH1A1 has also been described in human high-grade gliomas [57] but is not uniform inside GBM and is typical of cells located at the periphery of the tumors with a classical transcriptional subtype that have the worst prognosis [55].

7. ALDH1A3 Functions in Glioma and Glioblastoma Are Multifaceted

In human GBM and other gliomas, ALDH1A3 is involved in different biochemical pathways (Table 2) that may explain the importance of the enzyme for tumor proliferation and survival.
The first and foremost important pathway is related to the involvement of ALDH1A3 in the synthesis of all-trans-retinoic acid (atRA). Two enzymatic reactions are necessary to convert retinol to atRA: first, alcohol dehydrogenases (Adhs) (isoenzymes 1, 3, and 4) or retinol dehydrogenases (RDHs 1 and 10) convert retinol to retinaldehyde, and then retinaldehyde may be irreversibly converted by ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, or ALDH1A3 to atRA. ALDH1A1 is less efficient than ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3 in synthesizing atRA [58]. RA in vivo is short-lived (30 min), and enzymes like CYP26B1 contribute to its degradation [62]. Interestingly, the overexpression of CYP26B1, which breaks down atRA, has been associated with enhanced survival of African American patients affected by GBM who demonstrate a Karnofsky Performance Score > 80 at diagnosis [63]. On the contrary, enhanced dietary intake of vitamin A [64] and β-carotene [65] is associated with a lower incidence of GBM. Increased production of atRA by ALDH1A3 in GBM increases the level of transglutaminase, promoting the survival of cancer cells [49].
Quantitative analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of the concentration of atRA in tissue derived from clinical samples of GBM gave very low or undetectable values in the majority of tumors; in tumors where atRA was detectable, the values ranged from 4.4 to 31.2 ng/g tissue [66]. However, these values only reflect the bulk concentration of RA, while local accumulation of retinoids may be far more biologically important but go completely undetected.
The effects of the pharmacological administration or increased local synthesis of atRA in GBM have been described both as promoting and inhibiting GBM growth [66,67,68,69]. In humans, the RA signal is transduced by heterodimers of α, β, and γ retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and α, β, and γ retinoid-X receptors (RXRs) whose genes are expressed in GBM [70]. Moreover, RXRs can also form heterodimers with other partners like peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) [71] which is also expressed in GBM [72]. Heterodimers of RAR and RXR act as repressors or activators of gene expression by interacting with corepressors and coactivators after binding the appropriate ligands [73]. RARs bind both atRA and 9-cis-retinoic acid (9cisRA), whereas 9cisRA activates only RXR [71]. The presence of RXR “subordination” in heterodimers of RAR and RXR indicates that RXR cannot respond to its ligands unless RAR is already activated [73]. The presence of this complex multilayered network of protein interactions and ligands may explain the different actions ascribed to retinoids in gliomas [66,74].
Another mechanism that is independent of RAR/RXR activation and may explain the importance of ALDH1A3 in gliomas and other tumors has been linked to an increased production of NADH that protects the cell from ferroptosis by the activation of ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1). Ferroptosis protection is dependent on NADH generated by ALDH1A3 and is essential for the activation of FSP1 oxidoreductase, which transforms extra-mitochondrial ubiquinone to ubiquinol, counteracting lipid peroxidation and, thus, ferroptosis by reducing peroxyl radicals in phospholipid acyl chains [59,60]. ALDH1A3 in GBM may also directly influence ferroptosis by detoxifying the aldehydes resulting from spontaneous decomposition of lipid peroxides in cell membranes produced by the action of reactive oxygen species [55]. However, ALDH1A3 expression in GBM cells is necessary for the activity of exogenous ferroptosis inductors [54,75].
Another retinol-independent pathway that may be influenced by the enrichment of ALDH1A3 in proliferating cells of GBM and other tumors was initially described in endothelial cells of patients affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension [76]. In those cells, the local ALDH1A3-mediated production of acetate from acetaldehyde in the nucleus increases the acetyl coenzyme A pool available for histone H3 acetylation [76]. In GBM cells, ALDH1A3 turnover is dependent on the ubiquitin–proteasome system. As a result, both incompletely degraded isoforms of ALDH1A3, which partially retain their function, and inactive peptides generated by a more complete proteolysis accumulate in the nucleus [77].
Moreover, the pathogenic variant of histone H3 (H3K27M) that is present in midline diffuse gliomas (MDGs) is responsible for ALDH1A3 overexpression in those tumors [61]. Overexpression of ALDH1A3 in MDG cells is strongly inhibited by the pan-Wnt inhibitor XAV-939. In MDG, ALDH1A3 converts acetaldehyde into acetate, increasing the pool of acetate and CoA in the nucleus that in turn promotes the acetylation of the unmutated Lys27 of histone H3 [61,76].

8. Modulation of ALDH1A3 Expression at Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Levels

ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A3 promoter regulation depends on multiple transcription factors and enhancers [78]. CCAAT enhancer binding protein beta (CEBPβ) binding to a CAAT box in the ALDH1A3 promoter is responsible for the overexpression of the ALDH1A3 gene in several cancer cells [34]. In GBM cells, activated NF-kB can bind to the ALDH1A3 promoter and increase the expression of the gene [79]. The activation of the b-catenin/T cell factor pathway also increases the transcription of ALDH1A3 [76]. The ALDH1A3 promoter is often hypermethylated compared to normal tissue in cell lines derived from lung [80], breast [80], colon [80], prostate [80], and cervical [28] cancers. Hypermethylation of the ALDH1A3 promoter in GBM patients is associated with a low expression of ALDH1A3 and a better prognosis [81]; the same seems to be true for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer [42].
On the contrary, certain carcinogens present in the environment like benzopyrene increase the methylation of Lys36 of histone H3 (H3K36me3) associated with the ALDH1A3 gene, which stimulates ALDH1A3 expression [82]. In colorectal cancer, the ALDH1A3 promoter is overactivated by trans-3-indole acrylic acid (t3IDA). t3IDA is a tryptophan metabolite produced by Peptostreptococcus anaerobius that may be present in the human intestinal microbiota. t3IDA binds and activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that binds to the ALDH1A3 promoter and upregulates its transcription [59]. An increase in ALDH1A3 is necessary for colorectal carcinogenesis induced by t3IDA [59,83] In this pathway, one of the major roles of ALDH1A3 is NADH production, which is necessary for FSP1’s inhibitory activity on ferroptosis [59,83]. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is present in GBM and malignant gliomas, but it is still not known if t3IDA also plays a role in its activation in these tumors with an effect on ALDH1A3 transcription as described in colorectal cancer.
Another level of control on ALDH1A3 expression in gliomas and other cancers comes from miRNA targeting ALDH1A3 transcripts: miR-187 and miR-1301-3p downregulate ALDH1A3 expression in prostate cancer [84,85], miR-200-ZEB1/SANI2 inhibits ALDH1A3 expression in colorectal cancer cells [86], miR-548 downregulates ALDH1A3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and macrophages [32], and miR320b and miR-4524b-5p do the same in human high-grade gliomas and GBM, resulting in decreased proliferation and increased resistance of glioma cells to irradiation [44,87].
Post-transcriptional modifications can also modulate the stability and transcriptional efficiency of ALDH1A3 mRNAs. Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) is an RNA methyltransferase capable of methylating adenosine contained in mRNA in position 6 and generating N6-methyladenosine, the most extensive endogenous modification of mRNA. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, ALDH1A3 mRNA is one of the mRNAs that is most extensively modified by METTL3 [88]. METTL3 also promotes the proliferation and self-renewal of human GBM stem cells [89].
The intracellular level of ALDH1A3 is also controlled by protein degradation triggered by polyubiquitylation. In GBM cells with mesenchymal differentiation, the level of polyubiquitylation of ALDH1A3 is kept low by ubiquitin-specific protease 9X (USP9X), which acts as an efficient and specific deubiquitinase of ALDH1A3 [90]. USP9X depolyubiquitylation of ALDH1A3 effectively increases the half-life of ALDH1A3 in vitro and in vivo, helping the tumor maintain high levels of tumorigenic stem cells [90].

9. ALDH1A3 in Pleural Mesothelioma

Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is classified by the European Union as a rare disease. PM is an aggressive cancer that develops in the protective lining around the lungs, and it is caused by asbestos exposure. While there is an overall decreasing incidence trend in highly developed countries, an increasing trend was observed in other countries due to continuing asbestos use and environmental pollution [91]. PM is an orphan disease in terms of understanding pathogenic mechanisms and effective therapeutic approaches. The high number of PM patients refractory to first-line chemotherapy based on cisplatin and pemetrexed, as well as the increasing rates of second-line therapy failure, suggest the urgent need for novel mechanism-based therapies. In the absence of strategic oncogenic drivers for stratifying PM patients, it is crucial to identify signaling pathways that drive PM development and sustain its growth [92,93]. Recently, two immune-checkpoint blockers (ICBs), nivolumab and ipilimumab, have been approved as a frontline treatment option for unresectable PMs; despite promising clinical results, the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance remain to be better elucidated [94,95].
An analysis of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database involving 84 PM patients revealed that high ALDH1A3 expression is significantly associated with poorer prognosis [96]. This finding is confirmed by data demonstrating that in vitro treatment of stable and primary PM cell lines with cisplatin and pemetrexed triggered the emergence of drug-resistant PM cell subpopulations that exhibited high expression of mesenchymal markers and ALDH1A3, together with a high ALDH activity (ALDHbright). The results obtained from Affymetrix gene expression profiling analyses of ALDHbright and ALDHlow PM subpopulations revealed that 924 genes are differentially regulated according to ALDH activity status.
Signaling pathway analysis indicated that among the most upregulated pathways in the ALDHbright subpopulation, there is an enrichment of the NF-κB-related pathway. This is in accordance with the crucial role exerted by NF-κB in the survival and growth of chemoresistant cells [96]. Canino and colleagues described that in ALDHbright PM drug-resistant subpopulations, the complex signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-NF-κB is involved in the regulation of ALDH1A3 mRNA transcription. They demonstrated that pSTAT3(Tyr705)-NF-κB(p65) complex is required for the repression of DNA Damage Inducible Transcript 3 (DDIT3); this led to an instability of the complex DDIT3-CEBPβ and an increased occupancy of ALDH1A3 promoter by CEBPβ, resulting in high levels of ALDH1A3 expression. Disruption of STAT3-NF-κB complex stability with the compound butein significantly reduced ALDH1A3 expression, enhanced DNA damage response, and improved chemosensitivity in vitro and in vivo [34,96].
Moreover, Boumya and colleagues reported that NR6 (Figure 4), a highly potent and selective ALDH1A3 inhibitor, hindered the growth of ALDH1A3-positive PM cells cultured in 3D as multicellular spheroids (MCSs). NR6 induced a senescent growth arrest and led to the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). They demonstrated that NR6 caused the intracellular accumulation of the toxic aldehyde malondialdehyde (MDA), resulting in DNA damage and a global reduction in total NAD in PM MCSs. Furthermore, they reported that NR6 treatment stimulated IL6 expression but significantly inhibited the expression and release of IL-8, thereby impairing neutrophil recruitment [35].

10. ALDH1A3-Selective Inhibitors

Inhibitors of ALDH1A3 may be valuable in developing new therapies for patients with cancer, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disorders. Moreover, ALDH1A3 inhibitors may also modulate the immune response and enhance T-cell infiltration of tumors, resulting in the inhibition of tumor growth [97].
Current studies on the effects of ALDH1A inhibitors on the growth and proliferation of cancer cells have been carried out using compounds that had little isoform specificity and often were simultaneously interfering with other members of different classes of the human ALDH superfamily. A common example is disulfiram (Figure 4), a clinically approved inhibitor of ALDH having activity on multiple ALDHs (Table 3) [98], which was employed in combination with copper in a multicenter phase II study on recurrent TMZ-resistant GBM without positive results [99]. Similarly, no significant clinical results were obtained by the addition of disulfiram to cisplatin in the therapy of refractory germ cell tumors [100]. On the contrary, the addition of disulfiram to chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer appeared to prolong patient survival [101]. The contradictory results obtained in trials where disulfiram was added to standard chemotherapy to treat cancer may be in part due to the prodrug nature of the molecule, its low specificity, and its rapid metabolism in vivo [102]. These considerations do not necessarily indicate that inhibiting ALDH in tumors is not worth pursuing.
On the contrary, many research groups have recently invested much effort in the development of ALDH1A inhibitors with high specificity for the different isoforms, which are currently being tested in preclinical models and, hopefully, could reach the stage of a clinical trial in the foreseeable future. In this context, new selective ALDH1A3 inhibitors have been recently developed starting from structurally different compounds [20,23,86,103,104,105]. Among them, NR6 (Figure 4, Table 3) emerged with a potent and selective inhibitory profile (IC50 = 5.3 ± 1.5 µM on the recombinant enzyme). Interestingly, NR6 is able to bind to a specific ALDH1A3 residue (Tyr472) in the catalytic tunnel not conserved in the other subfamily members, as demonstrated by X-ray crystallographic analysis supported by molecular docking simulations. Moreover, NR6 demonstrated in vitro cytotoxic activity against GBM and colorectal cancer cells in the submicromolar range [23]. Further structural modification of N6 led La Motta and coworkers to identify MF7 (Figure 4), a fluoro derivative showing a micromolar IC50 (=22.8 ± 1.6 μM, Table 3) on recombinant human ALDH1A3 in enzymatic assays and antiproliferative activity in the breast cancer MDA-468 cell line in vitro [106].
More recently, ALDH1A3 inhibitors with a substituted benzaldehyde scaffold have been developed by chemical modification of 4-(diethylamino)benzaldehyde (DEAB, Figure 4) (micromolar IC50 on the recombinant enzyme, Table 3), a known ALDH substrate employed in the AldefluorTM assay, with some compounds showing antiproliferative activity in vitro against prostate cancer tumor cells when added to the culture medium in the micromolar range. Among them, although not selective for 1A3 isoform, 3-bromo-4-(dipropylamino)benzaldehyde (Figure 4) (IC50 = 0.63 ± 0.02 µM on the recombinant enzyme, Table 3) showed a potent antiproliferative activity [105]. A selective ALDH1A3 inhibitor, a quinazolin-4-amine derivative (Figure 4, Table 3), was recently reported by Kamiyama et al. to possess potent inhibitory activity in both enzymatic (IC50 = 0.0640 µM on the recombinant enzyme) and AldefluorTM assays in breast cancer MDA-MB231 cells [103,104]. Also, different 6-substituted-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-ones, whose representative ALDHI-1001 is depicted in Figure 4, were reported to inhibit selectively ALDH1A3 (Table 3) [107].
None of the new specific ALDH1A3 inhibitors have been extensively tested in preclinical models. However, these studies are underway, and hopefully, they will lead to the identification of potentially useful compounds for further testing in clinics.
Table 3. Reported inhibitors of ALDH1A3 and their enzymatic inhibition and selectivity data.
Table 3. Reported inhibitors of ALDH1A3 and their enzymatic inhibition and selectivity data.
CompoundEnzymatic Inhibition (hALDH1A3)Selectivity (Enzymatic Assay)Ref.
Disulfiramn.a.IC50 = 0.13 ± 0.10 µM on ALDH1A1;
IC50 = 3.40 ± 0.71 µM on ALDH2		[98]
NR6IC50 = 5.3 ± 1.5 µM;
KI = 3.7 ± 0.4 µM		InhIb.% = 11.3 at 25 µM on ALDH1A1;
not active at 25 µM on ALDH1A2		[22,23]
MF7IC50 = 22.8 ± 1.6 µMnot active at 25 µM on ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2[22]
DEABIC50 = 10.4 ± 1.0 µM.
IC50 = 4.27 µM		IC50 = 0.48 ± 0.06 µM on ALDH1A1;
IC50 = 5.67 ± 0.66 µM on ALDH3A1.
IC50 = 23.9 µM on ALDH1A1;
IC50 > 100 µM on ALDH1A2;
IC50 = 2.73 µM on ALDH3A1.		[103,105]
3-Bromo-4-(dipropylamino)benzaldehydeIC50 = 0.63 ± 0.02 µMIC50 = 7.08 ± 0.70 µM on ALDH1A1;
IC50 = 8.00 ± 1.56 µM on ALDH3A1.		[105]
Quinazolin-4-amine derivativeIC50 = 0.0640 µMIC50 = 45.3 µM on ALDH1A1;
IC50 > 100 µM on ALDH1A2 and ALDH3A1		[103]
3,4-Dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one representative (ALDHI-1001)IC50 < 0.1 μMIC50 ≥ 100 μM on ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, and ALDH2WO 2022/123039 A1 (patent) [107]
Probe IKI = 0.880 μMn.a.[4]

11. ALDH1A3 Ligands as Tumor Markers In Vivo

The long-term interest in developing new ALDH substrates was not only motivated by their potential pharmacological usefulness as inhibitors or activators of ALDH enzymatic activity but also by their extensive use in labeling and selecting specific cell populations.
The first fluorescent non-toxic substrate for ALDHs was 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODYPY)-aminoacetaldehyde (BAAA, Figure 4) [108]. BAAA is a compound that passively diffuses into intact cells and is trapped inside the cells after transformation by ALDHs into the corresponding negatively charged benzoic acid (BAA−, Figure 4) [108]. It was originally developed for isolating primitive human hematopoietic cells, but after becoming commercially available under the name AldefluorTM, it was used for labeling and isolating cancer stem cells [109]. However, although AldefluorTM is still widely used for stem cell isolation, it is not specific for a single ALDH enzyme or a single ALDH subfamily but may be metabolized by at least 9 (ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH2, ALDH3A1, ALDH3A2, ALDH3B1, and ALDH5A1) of the 19 different human ALDH isoforms [110]. Moreover, AldefluorTM interactions with ABC transporters induce high efflux rates of the molecule, reducing the concentration of the tracer inside the cells to a level that may produce false negative results even if the cells are expressing one or more ALDH1A isoforms [111].
These and other issues that affect other fluorescently labeled aminoacetaldehyde derivatives currently available as labels for ALDH1A-expressing cells hamper their use as specific “tools” for the detection and accurate removal of high-grade gliomas and other tumors during surgery. Fluorescence-guided resection of malignant gliomas is a rapidly evolving technique that is currently based on the injection of fluorescent markers like fluorescein and 5-aminolevulinic acid that accumulate in the tumor by unspecific mechanisms [112,113,114]. These same untargeted mechanisms that lead to glioma in vivo labeling by fluorescein can be affected by unknown factors potentially leading to both false negative and false positive errors in tumor tissue identification during surgery.
Capitalizing on our previous experience in developing selective inhibitors of ALDH1A3 [21,22,23], we have developed two different selective ALDH1A3 fluorescent probes: Probe I (Figure 4) and II, with a curcumin scaffold-based nature. P I, besides inhibiting the ADLH1A3 in the nanomolar range (KI = 0.880 μM on recombinant human enzyme), may fluorescently label experimental high-grade gliomas growing in vivo orthotopically inside the hemispheres of mice brain [4]. In the same experiments, we also found that isolated tumor cells adjacent to the main tumor mass were labeled [4]. This last observation suggests that contrary to fluorescein diacetate, the most common fluorescent probe used for labeling GBM during neurosurgery, the ALDH1A3 substrates can also label tumor cells contained in the brain adjacent to the tumor area. Those cells are responsible for GBM relapse [115], and their identification potentially allows for a more complete removal of the tissue invaded by glioblastoma.

12. Conclusions

Increased expression of ALDH1A3 in GBM and many other cancers is now confirmed by multiple approaches by different authors. While the role of ALDH1A3 in the synthesis of tRA from retinaldehyde is undoubted, the RA-controlled pathways are certainly not the only ones explaining ALDH1A3 overexpression in GBM and cancer. Both local acetate production from acetaldehyde and NAD(P)H generation by ALDH1A3 activation also seem to play an important role in the growth and survival of gliomas and other cancers.
If we consider the versatility of ALDH1A isoforms in processing different substrates, it is important to investigate if other substrates, apart from retinaldehyde and acetaldehyde, contribute in vivo to the pro-carcinogenic activity of ALDH1A3.
Moreover, considering the new opportunities that the new ALDH1A3 inhibitors and fluorescent probes offer, it is now important to test them in appropriate experimental models that will allow the measurement of their activity and specificity in vivo. All of this will increase our confidence in ALDH1A3 as a marker and a key enzyme targeting some of the most aggressive and still hopeless cancers like GBM and mesothelioma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M., S.G., C.L.M. and G.P.; review and editing of the manuscript, L.M., G.P., S.L., S.C., A.S., V.G., B.L.B., I.D., F.J., C.L.M. and S.G.; funding acquisition, L.M., S.G. and C.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Union—Next Generation EU—PNRR M6C2—Investment 2.1 “Valorizzazione e potenziamento della ricerca biomedica del SSN” PNRR-POC-2022-12376588 to L.M., S.G. and C.L.M. Cancers 16 02397 i001

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study is a review and did not require ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

The present study is a review and did not require ethical approval.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available within the paper and the cited references.

Conflicts of Interest

S.G. and L.M. are among the holders of the patent “PROBE DIRECTED TO ENZYME ALDH1A3 AND USE THERE OF IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF GLIOBLASTOMA” PCT/IB2022/053216 (6 April 2022); International Application. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Chen, C.-H.; Kraemer, B.R.; Lee, L.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Annotation of 1350 Common Genetic Variants of the 19 ALDH Multigene Family from Global Human Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ferraris, D.M.; Gelardi, E.L.M.; Garavaglia, S.; Miggiano, R.; Rizzi, M. Targeting NAD-Dependent Dehydrogenases in Drug Discovery against Infectious Diseases and Cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2020, 48, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vasiliou, V.; Thompson, D.C.; Smith, C.; Fujita, M.; Chen, Y. Aldehyde Dehydrogenases: From Eye Crystallins to Metabolic Disease and Cancer Stem Cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2013, 202, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gelardi, E.L.M.; Caprioglio, D.; Colombo, G.; Del Grosso, E.; Mazzoletti, D.; Mattoteia, D.; Salamone, S.; Ferraris, D.M.; Aronica, E.; Nato, G.; et al. Curcumin-Based-Fluorescent Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 as a Promising Tool for Glioblastoma Precision Surgery and Early Diagnosis. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cañestro, C.; Catchen, J.M.; Rodríguez-Marí, A.; Yokoi, H.; Postlethwait, J.H. Consequences of Lineage-Specific Gene Loss on Functional Evolution of Surviving Paralogs: ALDH1A and Retinoic Acid Signaling in Vertebrate Genomes. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ziouzenkova, O.; Orasanu, G.; Sharlach, M.; Akiyama, T.E.; Berger, J.P.; Viereck, J.; Hamilton, J.A.; Tang, G.; Dolnikowski, G.G.; Vogel, S.; et al. Retinaldehyde Represses Adipogenesis and Diet-Induced Obesity. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Niederreither, K.; Subbarayan, V.; Dollé, P.; Chambon, P. Embryonic Retinoic Acid Synthesis Is Essential for Early Mouse Post-Implantation Development. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dupé, V.; Matt, N.; Garnier, J.-M.; Chambon, P.; Mark, M.; Ghyselinck, N.B. A Newborn Lethal Defect Due to Inactivation of Retinaldehyde Dehydrogenase Type 3 Is Prevented by Maternal Retinoic Acid Treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 14036–14041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghyselinck, N.B.; Duester, G. Retinoic Acid Signaling Pathways. Development 2019, 146, dev167502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alnouti, Y.; Klaassen, C.D. Tissue Distribution, Ontogeny, and Regulation of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (Aldh) Enzymes mRNA by Prototypical Microsomal Enzyme Inducers in Mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 101, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodriguez-Zavala, J.S.; Weiner, H. Structural Aspects of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase That Influence Dimer−Tetramer Formation. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 8229–8237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vasiliou, V.; Bairoch, A.; Tipton, K.F.; Nebert, D.W. Eukaryotic Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH) Genes: Human Polymorphisms, and Recommended Nomenclature Based on Divergent Evolution and Chromosomal Mapping. Pharmacogenetics 1999, 9, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Koppaka, V.; Thompson, D.C.; Chen, Y.; Ellermann, M.; Nicolaou, K.C.; Juvonen, R.O.; Petersen, D.; Deitrich, R.A.; Hurley, T.D.; Vasiliou, V. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review of the Pharmacology, Mechanism of Action, Substrate Specificity, and Clinical Application. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012, 64, 520–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Marchitti, S.A.; Brocker, C.; Stagos, D.; Vasiliou, V. Non-P450 Aldehyde Oxidizing Enzymes: The Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Superfamily. Expert. Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008, 4, 697–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. George Priya Doss, C. Single Amino Acid Polymorphism in Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene Superfamily. Front. Biosci. 2015, 20, 335–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moretti, A.; Li, J.; Donini, S.; Sobol, R.W.; Rizzi, M.; Garavaglia, S. Crystal Structure of Human Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 Complexed with NAD+ and Retinoic Acid. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Duester, G. Retinoic Acid Synthesis and Signaling during Early Organogenesis. Cell 2008, 134, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balmer, J.E.; Blomhoff, R. Gene Expression Regulation by Retinoic Acid. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 1773–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Duan, J.; Cai, J.; Guo, Y.; Bian, X.; Yu, S. ALDH1A3, a Metabolic Target for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 965–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Garavaglia, S.; Ye, Z.; Moretti, A.; Belyaeva, O.V.; Beiser, A.; Ibrahim, M.; Wilk, A.; McClellan, S.; Klyuyeva, A.V.; et al. A Specific Inhibitor of ALDH1A3 Regulates Retinoic Acid Biosynthesis in Glioma Stem Cells. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quattrini, L.; Gelardi, E.L.M.; Petrarolo, G.; Colombo, G.; Ferraris, D.M.; Picarazzi, F.; Rizzi, M.; Garavaglia, S.; La Motta, C. Progress in the Field of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Novel Imidazo [1,2-a]Pyridines against the 1A Family. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quattrini, L.; Gelardi, E.L.M.; Coviello, V.; Sartini, S.; Ferraris, D.M.; Mori, M.; Nakano, I.; Garavaglia, S.; La Motta, C. Imidazo [1,2-a]Pyridine Derivatives as Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors: Novel Chemotypes to Target Glioblastoma Stem Cells. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 4603–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gelardi, E.L.M.; Colombo, G.; Picarazzi, F.; Ferraris, D.M.; Mangione, A.; Petrarolo, G.; Aronica, E.; Rizzi, M.; Mori, M.; La Motta, C.; et al. A Selective Competitive Inhibitor of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 Hinders Cancer Cell Growth, Invasiveness and Stemness In Vitro. Cancers 2021, 13, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xanthis, V.; Mantso, T.; Dimtsi, A.; Pappa, A.; Fadouloglou, V.E. Human Aldehyde Dehydrogenases: A Superfamily of Similar Yet Different Proteins Highly Related to Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Samson, J.M.; Ravindran Menon, D.; Smith, D.E.; Baird, E.; Kitano, T.; Gao, D.; Tan, A.-C.; Fujita, M. Clinical Implications of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A3 mRNA Expression in Melanoma Subtypes. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 314, 108822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shao, C.; Sullivan, J.P.; Girard, L.; Augustyn, A.; Yenerall, P.; Rodriguez-Canales, J.; Liu, H.; Behrens, C.; Shay, J.W.; Wistuba, I.I.; et al. Essential Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 for the Maintenance of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Stem Cells Is Associated with the STAT3 Pathway. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 4154–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Marcato, P.; Dean, C.A.; Liu, R.-Z.; Coyle, K.M.; Bydoun, M.; Wallace, M.; Clements, D.; Turner, C.; Mathenge, E.G.; Gujar, S.A.; et al. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 Influences Breast Cancer Progression via Differential Retinoic Acid Signaling. Mol. Oncol. 2015, 9, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, H.-S.; Yun, J.H.; Jung, J.; Yang, Y.; Kim, B.-J.; Lee, S.-J.; Yoon, J.H.; Moon, Y.; Kim, J.-M.; Kwon, Y.-I. Identification of Differentially-Expressed Genes by DNA Methylation in Cervical Cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, S.; Arcaroli, J.; Thompson, D.C.; Messersmith, W.; Vasiliou, V. Acetaldehyde and Retinaldehyde-Metabolizing Enzymes in Colon and Pancreatic Cancers. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 815, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, M.-H.; Weng, J.-J.; Cheng, C.-T.; Wu, R.-C.; Huang, S.-C.; Wu, C.-E.; Chung, Y.-H.; Liu, C.-Y.; Chang, M.-H.; Chen, M.-H.; et al. ALDH1A3, the Major Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Isoform in Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells, Affects Prognosis and Gemcitabine Resistance in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 4225–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mao, P.; Joshi, K.; Li, J.; Kim, S.-H.; Li, P.; Santana-Santos, L.; Luthra, S.; Chandran, U.R.; Benos, P.V.; Smith, L.; et al. Mesenchymal Glioma Stem Cells Are Maintained by Activated Glycolytic Metabolism Involving Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8644–8649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xu, M.; Zhou, C.; Weng, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Gao, J.; Shi, G.; Ke, A.; Ren, N.; Sun, H.; et al. Tumor Associated Macrophages-Derived Exosomes Facilitate Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignance by Transferring lncMMPA to Tumor Cells and Activating Glycolysis Pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Huang, J.; Tang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, W.; Kang, F.; Tan, S.; Lin, L.; Lu, X.; Wei, H.; Wang, N. ALDH1A3 Contributes to Tumorigenesis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by Epigenetic Modification. Cell. Signal. 2024, 116, 111044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Canino, C.; Luo, Y.; Marcato, P.; Blandino, G.; Pass, H.I.; Cioce, M. A STAT3-NFkB/DDIT3/CEBPβ Axis Modulates ALDH1A3 Expression in Chemoresistant Cell Subpopulations. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 12637–12653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Boumya, S.; Fallarini, S.; Siragusa, S.; Petrarolo, G.; Aprile, S.; Audrito, V.; La Motta, C.; Garavaglia, S.; Moro, L.; Pinton, G. A Selective ALDH1A3 Inhibitor Impairs Mesothelioma 3-D Multicellular Spheroid Growth and Neutrophil Recruitment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Simons, Z.B.; Morgan, R.C.; Rose, L.; Nelson, J.B.; Tersey, S.A.; Mirmira, R.G. Hypoglycemia in a Patient with a Polyhormonal Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor with Evidence of Endocrine Progenitors. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018, 2, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kasai, T.; Tamori, S.; Takasaki, Y.; Matsuoka, I.; Ozaki, A.; Matsuda, C.; Harada, Y.; Sasaki, K.; Ohno, S.; Akimoto, K. High Expression of PKCλ and ALDH1A3 Indicates a Poor Prognosis, and PKCλ Is Required for the Asymmetric Cell Division of ALDH1A3-Positive Cancer Stem Cells in PDAC. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023, 669, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Quattrini, L.; Sadiq, M.; Petrarolo, G.; Maitland, N.J.; Frame, F.M.; Pors, K.; La Motta, C. Aldehyde Dehydrogenases and Prostate Cancer: Shedding Light on Isoform Distribution to Reveal Druggable Target. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Le Magnen, C.; Bubendorf, L.; Rentsch, C.A.; Mengus, C.; Gsponer, J.; Zellweger, T.; Rieken, M.; Thalmann, G.N.; Cecchini, M.G.; Germann, M.; et al. Characterization and Clinical Relevance of ALDHbright Populations in Prostate Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 5361–5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, X.; Deng, W.; Dong, Z.; Luo, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhang, J.; Xie, Z.; Zheng, T.; Tan, Y.; Tang, Z.; et al. Redox Metabolism-Associated Molecular Classification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, S.; Bae, J.S.; Jung, C.K.; Chung, W.Y. Extensive Lymphatic Spread of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma Is Associated with an Increase in Expression of Genes Involved in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Cancer Stem Cell-like Properties. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 6528–6537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, Y.-J.; Yoon, H.-Y.; Kim, J.S.; Kang, H.W.; Min, B.-D.; Kim, S.-K.; Ha, Y.-S.; Kim, I.Y.; Ryu, K.H.; Lee, S.-C.; et al. HOXA9, ISL1 and ALDH1A3 Methylation Patterns as Prognostic Markers for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Array-Based DNA Methylation and Expression Profiling. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjöstedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A Pathology Atlas of the Human Cancer Transcriptome. Science 2017, 357, eaan2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mao, P.; Wang, T.; Gao, K.; Li, Y.; Du, C.; Wang, M. MiR-320b Aberrant Expression Enhances the Radioresistance of Human Glioma via Upregulated Expression of ALDH1A3. Aging 2023, 15, 2347–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xu, S.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, Q. The Adaptive Transition of Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Its Implications on Treatments. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bv, H.; Jolly, M.K. Proneural-Mesenchymal Antagonism Dominates the Patterns of Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma. iScience 2024, 27, 109184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Steponaitis, G.; Tamasauskas, A. Mesenchymal and Proneural Subtypes of Glioblastoma Disclose Branching Based on GSC Associated Signature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wu, F.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, W.; Bao, Z.; Wang, Y.; et al. ALDH1A3 Induces Mesenchymal Differentiation and Serves as a Predictor for Survival in Glioblastoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sullivan, K.E.; Rojas, K.; Cerione, R.A.; Nakano, I.; Wilson, K.F. The Stem Cell/Cancer Stem Cell Marker ALDH1A3 Regulates the Expression of the Survival Factor Tissue Transglutaminase, in Mesenchymal Glioma Stem Cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 22325–22343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gan, C.; Pierscianek, D.; El Hindy, N.; Ahmadipour, Y.; Keyvani, K.; Sure, U.; Zhu, Y. The Predominant Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Marker ALDH1A3 in Tumor Infiltrative Area Is Associated with Shorter Overall Survival of Human Glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, L.; Jung, J.; Babikir, H.; Shamardani, K.; Jain, S.; Feng, X.; Gupta, N.; Rosi, S.; Chang, S.; Raleigh, D.; et al. A Single-Cell Atlas of Glioblastoma Evolution under Therapy Reveals Cell-Intrinsic and Cell-Extrinsic Therapeutic Targets. Nat. Cancer 2022, 3, 1534–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Smith, S.J.; Diksin, M.; Chhaya, S.; Sairam, S.; Estevez-Cebrero, M.A.; Rahman, R. The Invasive Region of Glioblastoma Defined by 5ALA Guided Surgery Has an Altered Cancer Stem Cell Marker Profile Compared to Central Tumour. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, Z.; Will, R.; Na Kim, S.; Busch, M.A.; Dünker, N.; Dammann, P.; Sure, U.; Zhu, Y. Novel Function of Cancer Stem Cell Marker ALDH1A3 in Glioblastoma: Pro-Angiogenesis through Paracrine PAI-1 and IL-8. Cancers 2023, 15, 4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wu, Y.; Franzmeier, S.; Liesche-Starnecker, F.; Schlegel, J. Enhanced Sensitivity to ALDH1A3-Dependent Ferroptosis in TMZ-Resistant Glioblastoma Cells. Cells 2023, 12, 2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wu, W.; Wu, Y.; Mayer, K.; von Rosenstiel, C.; Schecker, J.; Baur, S.; Würstle, S.; Liesche-Starnecker, F.; Gempt, J.; Schlegel, J. Lipid Peroxidation Plays an Important Role in Chemotherapeutic Effects of Temozolomide and the Development of Therapy Resistance in Human Glioblastoma. Transl. Oncol. 2020, 13, 100748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xiang, X.; Ji, Z.; Jin, J. Brachytherapy Is an Effective and Safe Salvage Option for Re-Irradiation in Recurrent Glioblastoma (rGBM): A Systematic Review. Radiother. Oncol. 2024, 190, 110012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, S.-L.; Liu, S.; Cui, W.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Q.; Duan, J.-J.; Yu, S.-C.; Zhang, X.; Cui, Y.-H.; Kung, H.-F.; et al. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 Circumscribes High Invasive Glioma Cells and Predicts Poor Prognosis. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 1471–1483. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Haselbeck, R.J.; Hoffmann, I.; Duester, G. Distinct Functions for Aldh1 and Raldh2 in the Control of Ligand Production for Embryonic Retinoid Signaling Pathways. Dev. Genet. 1999, 25, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cui, W.; Guo, M.; Liu, D.; Xiao, P.; Yang, C.; Huang, H.; Liang, C.; Yang, Y.; Fu, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Gut Microbial Metabolite Facilitates Colorectal Cancer Development via Ferroptosis Inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2024, 26, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kram, H.; Prokop, G.; Haller, B.; Gempt, J.; Wu, Y.; Schmidt-Graf, F.; Schlegel, J.; Conrad, M.; Liesche-Starnecker, F. Glioblastoma Relapses Show Increased Markers of Vulnerability to Ferroptosis. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 841418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sharma, M.; Barravecchia, I.; Magnuson, B.; Ferris, S.F.; Apfelbaum, A.; Mbah, N.E.; Cruz, J.; Krishnamoorthy, V.; Teis, R.; Kauss, M.; et al. Histone H3 K27M-Mediated Regulation of Cancer Cell Stemness and Differentiation in Diffuse Midline Glioma. Neoplasia 2023, 44, 100931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roberts, C. Regulating Retinoic Acid Availability during Development and Regeneration: The Role of the CYP26 Enzymes. J. Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wu, M.; Miska, J.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, P.; Kane, J.R.; Balyasnikova, I.V.; Chandler, J.P.; Horbinski, C.M.; Lesniak, M.S. Race Influences Survival in Glioblastoma Patients with KPS ≥ 80 and Associates with Genetic Markers of Retinoic Acid Metabolism. J. Neurooncol 2019, 142, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lv, W.; Zhong, X.; Xu, L.; Han, W. Association between Dietary Vitamin A Intake and the Risk of Glioma: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8897–8904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, W.; Jiang, J.; He, Y.; Li, X.; Yin, S.; Chen, F.; Li, W. Association between Vitamins and Risk of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 935706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Campos, B.; Weisang, S.; Osswald, F.; Ali, R.; Sedlmeier, G.; Bageritz, J.; Mallm, J.-P.; Hartmann, C.; Von Deimling, A.; Popanda, O.; et al. Retinoid Resistance and Multifaceted Impairment of Retinoic Acid Synthesis in Glioblastoma: Impaired RA Signaling in Glioma. Glia 2015, 63, 1850–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Heo, J.-C.; Jung, T.-H.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.Y.; Choi, G.; Jung, M.; Jung, D.; Lee, H.K.; Lee, J.-O.; Park, J.-H.; et al. Effect of Bexarotene on Differentiation of Glioblastoma Multiforme Compared with ATRA. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2016, 33, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jia, P.-F.; Gu, W.-T.; Zhang, W.-F.; Li, F. Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas with 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid Naphthalene Triazole. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 36, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mawson, A. Retinoids in the Treatment of Glioma: A New Perspective. Cancer Manag. Res. 2012, 2012, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Magrassi, L.; Butti, G.; Silini, E.; Bono, F.; Paoletti, P.; Milanesi, G. The Expression of Genes of the Steroid-Thyroid Hormone Receptor Superfamily in Central Nervous System Tumors. Anticancer. Res. 1993, 13, 859–866. [Google Scholar]
  71. Petkovich, M.; Chambon, P. Retinoic Acid Receptors at 35 Years. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2022, 69, T13–T24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hua, T.N.M.; Oh, J.; Kim, S.; Antonio, J.M.; Vo, V.T.A.; Om, J.; Choi, J.-W.; Kim, J.-Y.; Jung, C.-W.; Park, M.-J.; et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma as a Theragnostic Target for Mesenchymal-Type Glioblastoma Patients. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 629–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Le Maire, A.; Teyssier, C.; Balaguer, P.; Bourguet, W.; Germain, P. Germain Regulation of RXR-RAR Heterodimers by RXR- and RAR-Specific Ligands and Their Combinations. Cells 2019, 8, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Campos, B.; Centner, F.-S.; Bermejo, J.L.; Ali, R.; Dorsch, K.; Wan, F.; Felsberg, J.; Ahmadi, R.; Grabe, N.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. Aberrant Expression of Retinoic Acid Signaling Molecules Influences Patient Survival in Astrocytic Gliomas. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wu, Y.; Kram, H.; Gempt, J.; Liesche-Starnecker, F.; Wu, W.; Schlegel, J. ALDH1-Mediated Autophagy Sensitizes Glioblastoma Cells to Ferroptosis. Cells 2022, 11, 4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, D.; Shao, N.-Y.; Moonen, J.-R.; Zhao, Z.; Shi, M.; Otsuki, S.; Wang, L.; Nguyen, T.; Yan, E.; Marciano, D.P.; et al. ALDH1A3 Coordinates Metabolism with Gene Regulation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 2021, 143, 2074–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fauß, J.; Sprang, B.; Leukel, P.; Sommer, C.; Nikolova, T.; Ringel, F.; Kim, E.L. ALDH1A3 Segregated Expression and Nucleus-Associated Proteasomal Degradation Are Common Traits of Glioblastoma Stem Cells. Biomedicines 2021, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Poturnajova, M.; Kozovska, Z.; Matuskova, M. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 and 1A3 Isoforms—Mechanism of Activation and Regulation in Cancer. Cell. Signal. 2021, 87, 110120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shi, Z.-F.; Li, G.-Z.; Zhai, Y.; Pan, C.-Q.; Wang, D.; Yu, M.-C.; Liu, C.; Zhang, W.; Yu, X.-G. EGFRvIII Promotes the Proneural–Mesenchymal Transition of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Reduces Its Sensitivity to Temozolomide by Regulating the NF-κB/ALDH1A3 Axis. Genes 2023, 14, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shames, D.S.; Girard, L.; Gao, B.; Sato, M.; Lewis, C.M.; Shivapurkar, N.; Jiang, A.; Perou, C.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Pollack, J.R.; et al. A Genome-Wide Screen for Promoter Methylation in Lung Cancer Identifies Novel Methylation Markers for Multiple Malignancies. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, W.; Yan, W.; You, G.; Bao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; You, Y.; Jiang, T. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies ALDH1A3 Promoter Methylation as a Prognostic Predictor in G-CIMP− Primary Glioblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2013, 328, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, H.; Jiang, S.; Xu, C.; Ma, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Xing, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Histone H3K36me3 Mediates the Genomic Instability of Benzo[a]Pyrene in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 346, 123564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, R.; Kang, R.; Tang, D. Gut Microbiome Mediates Ferroptosis Resistance for Colorectal Cancer Development. Cancer Res. 2024, 84, 796–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Casanova-Salas, I.; Masiá, E.; Armiñán, A.; Calatrava, A.; Mancarella, C.; Rubio-Briones, J.; Scotlandi, K.; Vicent, M.J.; López-Guerrero, J.A. MiR-187 Targets the Androgen-Regulated Gene ALDH1A3 in Prostate Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yin, H.; Qin, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hao, J.; Lu, Q.; Shi, J.; Zhuang, J.; et al. circCYP24A1 Promotes Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer by Upregulating ALDH1A3. Biomark. Res. 2022, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Duan, J.-J.; Wang, D.; Cai, J.; Chen, J.-J.; Zheng, X.-X.; Chen, T.-Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.-K.; Yu, S.-C. An Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 Inhibitor Attenuates the Metastasis of Human Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 536, 215662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yu, H.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, M.; Mao, P. MiR-4524b-5p-Targeting ALDH1A3 Attenuates the Proliferation and Radioresistance of Glioblastoma via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024, 30, e14396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Li, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, S.; Liu, L.; Cao, C.; Chen, D.; He, Q. METTL3-mediated ALDH M6A Methylation Regulates the Malignant Behavior of BMI1+ HNSCC Stem Cells. Oral. Dis. 2023, 30, 1061–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lv, D.; Gimple, R.C.; Zhong, C.; Wu, Q.; Yang, K.; Prager, B.C.; Godugu, B.; Qiu, Z.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, G.; et al. PDGF Signaling Inhibits Mitophagy in Glioblastoma Stem Cells through N6-Methyladenosine. Dev. Cell 2022, 57, 1466–1481.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chen, Z.; Wang, H.-W.; Wang, S.; Fan, L.; Feng, S.; Cai, X.; Peng, C.; Wu, X.; Lu, J.; Chen, D.; et al. USP9X deubiquitinates ALDH1A3 and maintains mesenchymal identity in glioblastoma stem cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2043–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, J.; Chan, S.C.; Pang, W.S.; Chow, S.H.; Lok, V.; Zhang, L.; Lin, X.; Lucero-Prisno, D.E.; Xu, W.; Zheng, Z.-J.; et al. Global Incidence, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends of Mesothelioma: A Population-Based Study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2023, 18, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Vogelzang, N.J.; Rusthoven, J.J.; Symanowski, J.; Denham, C.; Kaukel, E.; Ruffie, P.; Gatzemeier, U.; Boyer, M.; Emri, S.; Manegold, C.; et al. Phase III Study of Pemetrexed in Combination with Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Alone in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 2636–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ziółkowska, B.; Cybulska-Stopa, B.; Papantoniou, D.; Suwiński, R. Systemic Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma—Real Life Experience. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Peters, S.; Scherpereel, A.; Cornelissen, R.; Oulkhouir, Y.; Greillier, L.; Kaplan, M.A.; Talbot, T.; Monnet, I.; Hiret, S.; Baas, P.; et al. First-Line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: 3-Year Outcomes from CheckMate 743. Ann. Oncol. 2022, 33, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tsao, A.S.; Pass, H.I.; Rimner, A.; Mansfield, A.S. New Era for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Updates on Therapeutic Options. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cioce, M.; Sacconi, A.; Pass, H.I.; Canino, C.; Strano, S.; Blandino, G.; Fazio, V.M. Insights into Intra-Tumoral Heterogeneity: Transcriptional Profiling of Chemoresistant MPM Cell Subpopulations Reveals Involvement of NFkB and DNA Repair Pathways and Contributes a Prognostic Signature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bazewicz, C.G.; Dinavahi, S.S.; Schell, T.D.; Robertson, G.P. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Regulatory T-Cell Development, Immunity and Cancer. Immunology 2019, 156, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lipsky, J.J.; Shen, M.L.; Naylor, S. In Vivo Inhibition of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase by Disulfiram. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2001, 130–132, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Huang, J.; Chaudhary, R.; Cohen, A.L.; Fink, K.; Goldlust, S.; Boockvar, J.; Chinnaiyan, P.; Wan, L.; Marcus, S.; Campian, J.L. A Multicenter Phase II Study of Temozolomide plus Disulfiram and Copper for Recurrent Temozolomide-Resistant Glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol 2019, 142, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mego, M.; Svetlovska, D.; Angelis, V.D.; Kalavska, K.; Lesko, P.; Makovník, M.; Obertova, J.; Orszaghova, Z.; Palacka, P.; Rečková, M.; et al. Phase II Study of Disulfiram and Cisplatin in Refractory Germ Cell Tumors. The GCT-SK-006 Phase II Trial. Investig. New Drugs 2022, 40, 1080–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nechushtan, H.; Hamamreh, Y.; Nidal, S.; Gotfried, M.; Baron, A.; Shalev, Y.I.; Nisman, B.; Peretz, T.; Peylan-Ramu, N. A Phase IIb Trial Assessing the Addition of Disulfiram to Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Oncol. 2015, 20, 366–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cvek, B. The Promiscuity of Disulfiram in Medicinal Research. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 1610–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kamiyama, H.; Miyano, M.; Ito, D.; Kimura, T.; Hagiwara, K.; Kogai, H.; Kaburagi, Y.; Kotake, Y.; Takase, Y. Identification of a Novel ALDH1A3-Selective Inhibitor by a Chemical Probe with Unrelated Bioactivity: An Approach to Affinity-Based Drug Target Discovery. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2023, 101, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kargbo, R.B. Discovery of Selective Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 131–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ibrahim, A.I.M.; Batlle, E.; Sneha, S.; Jiménez, R.; Pequerul, R.; Parés, X.; Rüngeler, T.; Jha, V.; Tuccinardi, T.; Sadiq, M.; et al. Expansion of the 4-(Diethylamino)Benzaldehyde Scaffold to Explore the Impact on Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity and Antiproliferative Activity in Prostate Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 3833–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yamashita, D.; Minata, M.; Ibrahim, A.N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Coviello, V.; Bernstock, J.D.; Harada, S.; Cerione, R.A.; Tannous, B.A.; La Motta, C.; et al. Identification of ALDH1A3 as a Viable Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer Metastasis–Initiating Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 1134–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kershaw, C.S.; Aljarah, M.; Niculescu-Duvaz, D.; Dodsworth, M.P.; Bordoni, C.; Springer, C. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Inhibitors and Their Therapeutic Use. Patent WIPO (PCT) WO2022123039A1, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  108. Storms, R.W.; Trujillo, A.P.; Springer, J.B.; Shah, L.; Colvin, O.M.; Ludeman, S.M.; Smith, C. Isolation of Primitive Human Hematopoietic Progenitors on the Basis of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 9118–9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ginestier, C.; Hur, M.H.; Charafe-Jauffret, E.; Monville, F.; Dutcher, J.; Brown, M.; Jacquemier, J.; Viens, P.; Kleer, C.G.; Liu, S.; et al. ALDH1 Is a Marker of Normal and Malignant Human Mammary Stem Cells and a Predictor of Poor Clinical Outcome. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Duan, J.-J.; Cai, J.; Gao, L.; Yu, S.-C. ALDEFLUOR Activity, ALDH Isoforms, and Their Clinical Significance in Cancers. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2166035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Park, J.W.; Jung, K.-H.; Byun, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Moon, S.H.; Cho, Y.S.; Lee, K.-H. ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters Substantially Reduce Estimates of ALDH-Positive Cancer Cells Based on Aldefluor and AldeRed588 Assays. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Díez Valle, R.; Hadjipanayis, C.G.; Stummer, W. Established and Emerging Uses of 5-ALA in the Brain: An Overview. J. Neurooncol. 2019, 141, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Neira, J.A.; Ung, T.H.; Sims, J.S.; Malone, H.R.; Chow, D.S.; Samanamud, J.L.; Zanazzi, G.J.; Guo, X.; Bowden, S.G.; Zhao, B.; et al. Aggressive Resection at the Infiltrative Margins of Glioblastoma Facilitated by Intraoperative Fluorescein Guidance. J. Neurosurg. 2017, 127, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Katsevman, G.A.; Turner, R.C.; Urhie, O.; Voelker, J.L.; Bhatia, S. Utility of Sodium Fluorescein for Achieving Resection Targets in Glioblastoma: Increased Gross- or near-Total Resections and Prolonged Survival. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 132, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Dréan, A.; Goldwirt, L.; Verreault, M.; Canney, M.; Schmitt, C.; Guehennec, J.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Carpentier, A.; Idbaih, A. Blood-Brain Barrier, Cytotoxic Chemotherapies and Glioblastoma. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2016, 16, 1285–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 16 02397 g001
Figure 1. Ribbon representations of the monomeric and oligomeric structure of ALDH1A3. Structures were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3 Schrödinger, LLC; PDB code: 5FHZ. (A) The ALDH1A3 tetramer with chains (A–D) colored in red, yellow, green, and blue, respectively. The N-terminals (N-ter) are highly mobile and exposed on the surface of the tetramer, while the C-terminals point toward its core. N-t: N-terminus. (B) The ALDH1A3 monomer with its three domains indicated by different shadows of green: the NAD binding domain is shown in light green, the catalytic domain in forest green, and the oligomerization domain in olive green. The ligands NAD+ and RA are shown as grey and yellow sticks, respectively.
Figure 1. Ribbon representations of the monomeric and oligomeric structure of ALDH1A3. Structures were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3 Schrödinger, LLC; PDB code: 5FHZ. (A) The ALDH1A3 tetramer with chains (A–D) colored in red, yellow, green, and blue, respectively. The N-terminals (N-ter) are highly mobile and exposed on the surface of the tetramer, while the C-terminals point toward its core. N-t: N-terminus. (B) The ALDH1A3 monomer with its three domains indicated by different shadows of green: the NAD binding domain is shown in light green, the catalytic domain in forest green, and the oligomerization domain in olive green. The ligands NAD+ and RA are shown as grey and yellow sticks, respectively.
Cancers 16 02397 g001
Cancers 16 02397 g002
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the catalytic cycle of NAD(P)+-dependent ALDH. (1) The enzyme binds the NAD(P)+ cofactor; (2) the SH group of the activated Cys-302 attacks the aldehydic group of the substrate; (3) formation of a stabilized oxyanion thiohemiacetal intermediate; (4) formation of a thioacylenzyme intermediate with the formation of NAD(P)H; (5) the substrate is released after the hydrolysis of the thioacylenzyme of carboxyl acid; (6) the enzyme is regenerated upon releasing NAD(P)H and is ready for binding a new molecule of NAD(P)+.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the catalytic cycle of NAD(P)+-dependent ALDH. (1) The enzyme binds the NAD(P)+ cofactor; (2) the SH group of the activated Cys-302 attacks the aldehydic group of the substrate; (3) formation of a stabilized oxyanion thiohemiacetal intermediate; (4) formation of a thioacylenzyme intermediate with the formation of NAD(P)H; (5) the substrate is released after the hydrolysis of the thioacylenzyme of carboxyl acid; (6) the enzyme is regenerated upon releasing NAD(P)H and is ready for binding a new molecule of NAD(P)+.
Cancers 16 02397 g002
Cancers 16 02397 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of RA and NAD binding sites of the three ALDH1As. Structures were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3 Schrödinger, LLC; PDB code: 5FHZ. (A) Superposition overview of different amino acids involved in RA-ALDH1A3 binding. Side chains of key residues involved in the binding (L471, R139, T140, W189, and C314 (PDB code: 5FHZ)) are shown in forest green sticks. The corresponding residues conserved in ALDH1A2 (PDB code: 6ALJ) and ALDH1A1 (PDB code: 4WB9) are represented by orange and cyan sticks, respectively. RA is shown in yellow sticks. (B) Superposition overview of different amino acids involved in NAD+-ALDH1A3 binding. Side chains of key residues involved in the binding (K204, P238, T256, S258, T259, E260, V261, Q361, and K364 (PDB code: 5FHZ)) are shown in forest green sticks. The corresponding residues conserved in ALDH1A2 (PDB code: 6ALJ) and ALDH1A1 (PDB code: 4WB9) are represented by orange and cyan sticks, respectively. NAD+ is shown in grey sticks.
Figure 3. Comparison of RA and NAD binding sites of the three ALDH1As. Structures were generated using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3 Schrödinger, LLC; PDB code: 5FHZ. (A) Superposition overview of different amino acids involved in RA-ALDH1A3 binding. Side chains of key residues involved in the binding (L471, R139, T140, W189, and C314 (PDB code: 5FHZ)) are shown in forest green sticks. The corresponding residues conserved in ALDH1A2 (PDB code: 6ALJ) and ALDH1A1 (PDB code: 4WB9) are represented by orange and cyan sticks, respectively. RA is shown in yellow sticks. (B) Superposition overview of different amino acids involved in NAD+-ALDH1A3 binding. Side chains of key residues involved in the binding (K204, P238, T256, S258, T259, E260, V261, Q361, and K364 (PDB code: 5FHZ)) are shown in forest green sticks. The corresponding residues conserved in ALDH1A2 (PDB code: 6ALJ) and ALDH1A1 (PDB code: 4WB9) are represented by orange and cyan sticks, respectively. NAD+ is shown in grey sticks.
Cancers 16 02397 g003
Cancers 16 02397 g004
Figure 4. Structures of ALDH inhibitors and an ALDH-inhibiting fluorescent probe. For 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODYPY)-aminoacetaldehyde (BAAA), the corresponding benzoic acid generated by ALDH enzymatic activity on BAAA is also reported.
Figure 4. Structures of ALDH inhibitors and an ALDH-inhibiting fluorescent probe. For 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODYPY)-aminoacetaldehyde (BAAA), the corresponding benzoic acid generated by ALDH enzymatic activity on BAAA is also reported.
Cancers 16 02397 g004
Table 1. Level of ALDH1A3 in human tumors and its role as prognostic factor in cancer.
Table 1. Level of ALDH1A3 in human tumors and its role as prognostic factor in cancer.
CancerLevel of ALDH1A3Role in CancerSourceReferences
Breast cancerHighNegative prognostic valueHuman/mouse[27]
Cervical cancerHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[28]
Colorectal cancerHighNegative prognostic valueHuman/mouse[29]
CholangiocarcinomaHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[30]
GlioblastomaHighNegative prognostic valueHuman/mouse[31]
Hepatocellular carcinomaHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[32]
High-grade serous ovarian cancerHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[33]
MelanomaHighPositive prognostic valueHuman[25]
MesotheliomaHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[34,35]
Neuroendocrine tumorHighMalignancy indicatorHuman[36]
Pancreatic PNETHighNegative prognostic valueHuman[37]
Non-small-cell lung cancerHighPositive prognostic valueHuman[26]
Prostate cancerHighEnhanced metastasisHuman[38,39]
Renal cancerHighProgressionHuman[40]
Thyroid cancer (papillary)HighProgressionHuman[41]
Bladder cancerHighPositive prognostic valueHuman[42]
Table 2. ALDH1A3-dependent biochemical pathways in GBM.
Table 2. ALDH1A3-dependent biochemical pathways in GBM.
#ALDH1A3-Dependent PathwaysRef.
ISynthesis of all-trans-retinoic acid[58]
IINAD(P)H production[59,60]
IIIDetoxification of aldehydes derived from lipid peroxides[55]
IVAcetate production favors histone H3 acetylation[20,61]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magrassi, L.; Pinton, G.; Luzzi, S.; Comincini, S.; Scravaglieri, A.; Gigliotti, V.; Bernardoni, B.L.; D’Agostino, I.; Juretich, F.; La Motta, C.; et al. A New Vista of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3): New Specific Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 Dependent Pathways in Glioblastoma, Mesothelioma and Other Cancers. Cancers 2024, 16, 2397. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132397

AMA Style

Magrassi L, Pinton G, Luzzi S, Comincini S, Scravaglieri A, Gigliotti V, Bernardoni BL, D’Agostino I, Juretich F, La Motta C, et al. A New Vista of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3): New Specific Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 Dependent Pathways in Glioblastoma, Mesothelioma and Other Cancers. Cancers. 2024; 16(13):2397. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magrassi, Lorenzo, Giulia Pinton, Sabino Luzzi, Sergio Comincini, Andrea Scravaglieri, Valentina Gigliotti, Bianca Laura Bernardoni, Ilaria D’Agostino, Francesca Juretich, Concettina La Motta, and et al. 2024. "A New Vista of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3): New Specific Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 Dependent Pathways in Glioblastoma, Mesothelioma and Other Cancers" Cancers 16, no. 13: 2397. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132397

APA Style

Magrassi, L., Pinton, G., Luzzi, S., Comincini, S., Scravaglieri, A., Gigliotti, V., Bernardoni, B. L., D’Agostino, I., Juretich, F., La Motta, C., & Garavaglia, S. (2024). A New Vista of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3): New Specific Inhibitors and Activity-Based Probes Targeting ALDH1A3 Dependent Pathways in Glioblastoma, Mesothelioma and Other Cancers. Cancers, 16(13), 2397. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop