Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Literature Review
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
- The most recent publication regarding salvage surgery in SCLC is the brief report by Joosten and colleagues from 2021 [6]. The authors reported one of the largest cohorts of salvage surgery for SCLC, persistent or relapsed after chemoradiation; 10 patients were examined retrospectively, as they had been operated between 2008 and 2020 in their institution. The included patients were diagnosed with SCLC, one of them presenting a mixed form of SCLC + NSCLC. The multidisciplinary tumor board which decided the indication for surgery with salvation intent included at least “two lung cancer surgeons with varying levels of experience”. The stages before therapy were miscellaneous, and we present the detailed patient data in Table 1. Prophylactic cranial radiation was performed in 8 patients of the 10 presented, as part of the multimodality non-surgical plan specific for SCLC management. The indication for salvage surgery was local disease recurrence for nine patients and persistent local disease in one case. The time between the end of radiation therapy and the recurrence/persistence of the disease was between 3 months and 78 months. Before salvation resection, half of the patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Between the last day of radiation treatment and the time of resection, the time interval was of 3–80 months. All 10 patients received anatomical lung resection as salvation surgery. In total, five lobectomies, two bilobectomies, one pneumonectomy, and one segmentectomy were performed. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients (50%), but the mortality was zero at 30 days and 90 days postoperatively. In two patients, a pathological analysis found no residual tumoral tissue. The authors successfully concluded that a “multidisciplinary tumor board should consider surgical salvage for highly selected patients with locally recurrent or persistent SCLC after chemoradiotherapy” [6].
- One case was published by Kanayama and colleagues in 2019: a female patient treated with chemo–radiotherapy for a SCLC of the left lower lobe, with complete remission for 5 years. After 5 years, a 30 mm nodule appeared in the same lobe. The authors performed left lower lobectomy and lymph node dissection, and a pathological analysis showed combined a SCLC–large-cell carcinoma [7].
- Nakanishi and colleagues carried out through in 2018 an analysis of five cases of salvage surgery for SCLC after chemo–radiotherapy and reviewed the literature until that time; this excellent work was published in 2019 [8]. They found that the first papers on salvage surgery in SCLC were published in 1991 [9,10]. The results were unsatisfactory (the median survival after surgery was 13.5–18.5 months) because the studies were conducted on heterogeneous populations and before the establishment of modern standard therapies for limited-disease SCLC. The five cases presented by Nakanishi and colleagues, all male, were confirmed as limited-stage SCLC and treated with chemoradiation with curative intent. Subsequently, the patients received salvage surgery as a curative-intent lung resection for residual lesion (one case) or local re-progression in the previously irradiated area (four cases), more than 12 weeks after the last day of chemo–radiotherapy. The clinical stages before surgery were ycIA2, ycIA2, ycIA3, ycIB, and ycIB; therefore, all five patients were ycN0. As for the resection type, the authors performed three lobectomies with lymph node dissection (covering the bronchial stump with intercostal muscle flap) and two wedge resections without lymph node dissection, all through thoracotomy. Morbidity and 90-day mortality were zero. The pathological stages were ypIA2, ypIVa (pleural metastases), ypIB, ypIIB, and ypIIIA. The histology after salvage surgery showed SCLC in three cases, combined SCLC with adenocarcinoma in one case, and squamous cell carcinoma in one case. The estimated 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 100% and 67%, respectively [8].
- Another case was presented in the literature by Pan and colleagues in 2017 [11]. This was a male patient with cIIIA SCLC (cT2N2M0) not initially a candidate for surgery; due to progression under chemotherapy, he was considered chemotherapy-refractory, and salvage surgery was decided, consisting of right pneumonectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. No postoperative morbidity occurred. The pathological stage was pT2N2Mo—pIIIA, and the histology was SCLC. Postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy were administered, and the patient survived free of disease for more than 2 years [11].
- Eberhardt and colleagues conducted a phase II trial on a prognostically orientated multimodality approach, including surgery, for selected patients with SCLC; the results were published in 1999 [12]. Staging included CT scan (chest, upper abdomen, and brain), mediastinoscopy, and radionuclide bone scan (no PET or PET-CT). Surgery was planned for all cIB/IIA stages after four cycles of chemotherapy, all cIIB/IIIA (IIIB) stages after four cycles of chemotherapy and 45 Gy (delivered on the tumor and mediastinal nodes). Of the 46 patients included, 32 were planned for surgery and, after restaging (and excluding N2), 24 were operated. Twenty-three patients were resected, R0, but is not clear if all received chemo–radiotherapy or only chemotherapy. A pathological complete response was observed in 11 cases, SCLC histology in 9 cases, and NSCLC histology in 3 cases. The 5-year survival of those 23 patients was 63%. Relapse occurred in nine cases and only as distant metastases (no local/locoregional failure). Two patients developed a second primary cancer. Analyzing the paper, it is not clear how many patients were resected after chemoradiotherapy; the dose was only 45Gy; multimodality was given as in NSCLC; in fact, those cases do not correspond to the actual definition of salvage surgery. However, the TNM staging was probably conducted according to the 6th edition, and now those cases would be upstaged following the new definitions. We can consider that the excellent work of Eberhardt and colleagues demonstrated that surgery is feasible after chemo/chemo–radiation of SCLC in patients without N2, with good locoregional control and very good long-term survival.
- In 2009, Vallieres and colleagues published proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathological staging of SCLC in the 7th edition of TNM—the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project [3]. The huge database included 12620 eligible cases of SCLC, 349 of which were completely resected R0 cases with SCLC. The number of patients in each clinical stage (6th edition of TNM staging system) was: cI, 159, cII, 71, cIIIA, 76, cIIIB, 33, and cIV, 10 patients. There were 119 patients with clinical stages III and IV. It was not specified which patients received any induction therapy and was not possible to evaluate if and how many cases corresponded to the salvage surgery definition, to serve the purpose of our study. There is no doubt that the paper is extremely valuable, and the results offered are useful for the entire medical community.
Publication (in Alphabetical Order of the First Author’s Name) | Nr. crt. | Age (Years) | Gender | Stage at Diagnostic | Dose of RT (Gy) | Indication for Salvation Surgery (as Described by the Authors) | Time from RT to Surgery (mo) | Stage before Surgery (as Presented by the Authors) | Stage before Surgery cTNM | Resection Performed (as Described by Authors) ** | Pathology after Surgery | Pathological Stage ypTNM | Survival (mo) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joosten, 2021 [6] | 1 | 71 | f | cT4N2 | 66 | Recurrence | 23 | r-cT1aN0 | IA1 | Left upper lobectomy | N/A | ypT2N1 | >2 |
2 | 58 | f | cT2aN1 | 66 | Recurrence | 10 | r-cT1bN0 | IA2 | Left upper lobectomy | N/A | ypT1cN0 | >11 | |
3 | 59 | f | cT3N1 | 56 | Recurrence | 23 | r-cT2aN0 | IB | Right upper lobectomy | N/A | ypT1cN0 | >8 | |
4 | 53 | f | cT4N0 | N/A | Recurrence | 22 | r-cT4N0 | IIIA | Left pneumonectomy | N/A | ypT2N0 | >8 | |
5 | 64 | f | cT4N2 | 50 | Recurrence | 7 | r-cT1aN0 | IA1 | Right upper lobectomy | N/A | ypT1aN0 | >34 | |
6 | 66 | f | cT3N2 | N/A | Recurrence | 80 | r-cT3N1 | IIIA | Right upper bilobectomy | No malignancy | ypT0N0 | >35 | |
7 | 58 | m | cT3N0 | 66 | Persistent disease | 3 | r-cT3N0 | IIB | Right upper lobectomy | No malignancy | ypT0N0 | >71 | |
8 | 58 | f | cT2aN1 | 46 | Recurrence | 47 | r-cT1cN0 | IA3 | Segmentectomy (complex) 1,2,6 | N/A | ypT2aN1 | 86 DOD | |
9 | 48 | f | cT4N0 | 45 | Recurrence | 22 | r-cT2bN1 | IIB | Right upper bilobectomy | N/A | ypT2bN0 | 12 DOD | |
10 | 64 | m | cT1bN0 | 45 | Recurrence | 22 | r-cT1cN0 | IA3 | Right upper lobectomy | N/A | ypT2N0 | 33 DOD | |
Kanayama, 2019 [7] | 11 | 80 | f | cT2aN0M0-cIB | 45 | Late progression | 60 * | ycT2aN0M0-cIB | IB | Left lower lobectomy | Combined SCLC + LCLC | N/A | N/A |
Nakanishi, 2019 [8] | 12 | 59 | m | cT1cN3M0-cIIIB | 54 | Residual lesion | 18 | ycT1bN0M0-ycIA2 | IA2 | Wedge resection | SCLC | ypT2aNxM1a-ypIVA | 114 FOD |
13 | 61 | m | cT2aN2M0-cIIIA | 45 | Local reprogression | 10 | ycT1bN0M0-ycIA2 | IA2 | Wedge resection | SCLC | ypT2aN0M0-ypIB | 46 DOD | |
14 | 66 | m | cT4N0M0-cIIB | 45 | Local reprogression | 13 | ycT1cN0M0-ycIA3 | IA3 | Lobectomy | Combined SCLC + ADK | ypT1bNxM0-ypIA2 | 59 FOD | |
15 | 72 | m | cT1cN1M0-cIIB | 54 | Local reprogression | 24 | ycT2aN0M0-ycIB | IB | Lobectomy | SCLC | ypT1bN1M0-ypIIB | 21 FOD | |
16 | 70 | m | cT3N2M0-cIIIB | 45 | Local reprogression | 17 | ycT2aN0M0-ycIB | IB | Lobectomy | SqCC *** | ypT2aN2M0-ypIIIA | 25 FOD | |
Pan, 2017 [11] | 17 | 54 | m | cT2N2M0-cIIIA | - | Progression under CT | - | cT2N2M0-cIIIA | IIIA | Right pneumonectomy | SCLC | ypT2N2M0-pIIIA | >24 **** FOD |
4. Discussion
4.1. Definitions of Salvage Surgery in Lung Cancer
- (a)
- Salvage surgery for an emergent complication, as a life-saving procedure, performed for an event that occurred during the natural history of the tumor or as a complication during oncological treatment, including SBRT, with curative or palliative intent: massive hemoptysis, lung abscess, empyema, broncho–pleural fistula;
- (b)
- Salvage surgery after definitive (full-dose) chemo–radiation therapy/after previous local (SABR) or general treatment (ex. targeted therapy): residual/persistent localized disease, relapsed tumor/recurrence after complete response, cases judged to be contraindicated for chemotherapy or definite radiation therapy due to severe comorbidities, despite a clinical diagnosis of NSCLC stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV disease initially, delayed decision to convert to a trimodal approach;
- (c)
- Salvage surgery for progression under chemotherapy;
- (d)
- Salvage surgery for oligo-metastatic disease.
4.2. Salvage Surgery after a Full Dose of Chemo–Radiotherapy
4.3. Salvage Surgery for SCLC
- for tumor evolution under chemotherapy,
- after chemo-radiotherapy for residual lesions,
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Villaruz, L.; Karlovits, B.J.; Burns, T.F.; Socinski, M.A. Small-Cell Lung Cancer. In Shields’ General Thoracic Surgery, 8th ed.; LoCicero, J., Feins, R.H., III, Colson, Y.L., Rocco, G., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1308–1319. [Google Scholar]
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 2.2022—24 November 2021. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/sclc.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Vallieres, E.; Shepherd, F.A.; Crowley, J.J.; Van Houtte, P.; Postmus, P.E.; Carney, D.; Goldstraw, P. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project Proposals Regarding the Relevance of TNM in the Pathologic Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Forthcoming (Seventh) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J. Thor. Oncol. 2009, 4, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shields, T.W.; Higgins, G.A., Jr.; Matthews, M.J.; Keehn, R.J. Surgical resection in the management of small cell carcinoma of the lung. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1982, 84, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anraku, M.; Waddell, T.K. Surgery for small-cell lung cancer. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006, 18, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joosten, P.J.M.; Winkelman, T.A.; Heineman, D.J.; Hashemi, S.M.S.; Bahce, I.; Senan, S.; Paul, M.A.; Hartemink, K.J.; Dahele, M.; Dickhoff, C. Salvage Surgery for Patients with Local Recurrence or Persistent Disease After Treatment With Chemoradiotherapy for SCLC. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2021, 2, 100172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanayama, M.; Osaki, T.; Fukuichi, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Yasuda, M.; So, T. A case of salvage surgery for small cell lung cancer that locally relapsed five years after complete remission. Jpn. J. Lung Cancer 2019, 59, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakanishi, K.; Mizuno, T.; Sakakura, N.; Kuroda, H.; Shimizu, J.; Hida, T.; Yatabe, Y.; Sakao, Y. Salvage surgery for small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 49, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamada, K.; Saijo, N.; Kojima, A.; Ohe, Y.; Tamura, T.; Sasaki, Y.; Eguchi, K.; Shinkai, T.; Goya, T.; Kondou, H.; et al. A retrospective analysis of patients receiving surgery after chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 1991, 21, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd, F.A.; Ginsberg, R.; Patterson, G.A.; Feld, R.; Goss, P.E.; Pearson, F.G.; Todd, T.J.; Winton, T.; Rubinger, M.; Johansen, E. Is there ever a role for salvage operations in limited small-cell lung cancer? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1991, 101, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Kong, F.W.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, W.B.; Zhang, M. A recurrence-free survivor with chemotherapy-refractory small cell lung cancer after pneumonectomy. A case report and review of the literature. Medicine 2017, 96, e8922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eberhardt, W.; Stamatis, G.; Stuschke, M.; Wilke, H.; Müller, M.R.; Kolks, S.; Flasshove, M.; Schütte, J.; Stahl, M.; Schlenger, L.; et al. Prognostically orientated multimodality treatment including surgery for selected patients of small-cell lung cancer patients stages IB to IIIB: Long-term results of a phase II trial. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 81, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akiyoshi, T.; Fujimoto, Y.; Konishi, T.; Kuroyanagi, H.; Ueno, M.; Oya, M.; Miyata, S.; Yamaguchi, T. Prognostic factors for survival after salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence of colon cancer. Am. J. Surg. 2011, 201, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, C.; Tessier, W.; Gronnier, C.; Renaud, F.; Pasquer, A.; Théreaux, J.; Gagnière, J.; Meunier, B.; Collet, D.; Piessen, G.; et al. Salvage Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: How to Improve Outcomes? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 25, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petrella, F.; Leo, F.; Veronesi, G.; Solli, P.; Borri, A.; Galetta, D.; Gasparri, R.; Lembo, R.; Radice, D.; Scanagatta, P.; et al. “Salvage” surgery for primary mediastinal malignancies: Is it worthwhile? J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trifanescu, O.G.; Gales, L.N.; Serbanescu, G.L.; Zgura, A.F.; Iliescu, L.; Mehedintu, C.; Anghel, R.M. Long-term oncological outcome in patients with cervical cancer after 3 trimodality treatment (radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and robotic surgery). Medicine 2021, 100, e25271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uramoto, H. Current Topics on Salvage Thoracic Surgery in Patients with Primary Lung Cancer. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2016, 22, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, E.G.; Chan, P.G.; Schuchert, M.J. Results of Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. In Shields’ General Thoracic Surgery, 8th ed.; LoCicero, J., Feins, R.H., III, Colson, Y.L., Rocco, G., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1222–1252. [Google Scholar]
- Van Breussegem, A.; Hendriks, J.M.; Lauwers, P.; Van Schil, P.E. Salvage surgery after high-dose radiotherapy. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, S193–S200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uramoto, H.; Tanaka, F. Salvage thoracic surgery in patients with primary lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2014, 84, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spaggiari, L.; Petrella, L. Small Cell Lung Cancer. In ESTS Textbook of Thoracic Surgery; Kuzdzal, J., Asamura, H., Detterbeck, F., Goldstraw, P., Lerut, A., Thomas, P., Treasure, T., Eds.; Medycyna Praktyczna: Cracow, Poland, 2015; pp. 825–830. [Google Scholar]
- Suda, K.; Sato, K.; Mizuuchi, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shimoji, M.; Tomizawa, K.; Takemoto, T.; Iwasaki, T.; Sakaguchi, M.; Mitsudomi, T. Recent evidence, advances, and current practices in surgical treatment of lung cancer. Respir. Investig. 2014, 52, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Di, S.; Liu, J.; Fan, B.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, S.; Chen, S.; Dong, H.; Yue, C.; Gong, T. Salvage surgery for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after targeted therapy: A case series. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motas, N.; Horvat, T. eComment. Could the definitive chemoradiated stage III non-small-cell-lung cancer N3 patient be “saved” by salvation lung resection? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 23, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolan, D.P.; Lee, D.N.; Kucukak, S.; De León, L.E.; Bueno, R.; Jaklitsch, M.T.; Swanson, S.J.; White, A. Salvage surgery for local recurrence after sublobar surgery in Stages I and II non-small cell lung cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 126, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, S.; Asakura, K.; Okui, M.; Sawafuji, M.; Shigenobu, T.; Tajima, A.; Kaseda, K.; Masai, K.; Hishida, T.; Asamura, H. Safety and efficacy of salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study of 46 patients from four Keio-affiliated hospitals. Gen. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022, 70, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bertolaccini, L.; Galetta, D.; Sedda, G.; de Marinis, F.; Spaggiari, L. Safety Analysis of Salvage Surgery for Advanced Stages or Metastatic Lung Cancers. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022, 70, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eisenberg, M.; Deboever, N.; Antonoff, M.B. Salvage surgery in lung cancer following definitive therapies. J. Surg. Oncol. 2023, 127, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kobayashi, A.K.; Nakagawa, K.; Nakayama, Y.; Ohe, Y.; Yotsukura, M.; Uchida, S.; Asakura, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Watanabe, S.I. Salvage Surgery Compared to Surgery After Induction Chemoradiation Therapy for Advanced Lung Cancer. The Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2022, 114, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hino, H.; Utsumi, T.; Maru, N.; Matsui, H.; Taniguchi, Y.; Saito, T.; Tsuta, K.; Murakawa, T. Results of emergency salvage lung resection after chemo- and/or radiotherapy among patients with lung cancer. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2022, 35, ivac043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaba, E.; Ozyurtkan, M.O.; Ayalp, K.; Cosgun, T.; Alomari, M.R.; Toker, A. Salvage thoracic surgery in patients with lung cancer: Potential indications and benefits. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2018, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casiraghi, M.; Maisonneuve, P.; Piperno, G.; Bellini, R.; Brambilla, D.; Petrella, F.; Marinis, F.; Spaggiari, L. Salvage Surgery After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017, 29, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimada, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Okada, M.; Nakayama, H.; Ito, H.; Mitsudomi, T.; Saji, H.; Takamochi, K.; Kudo, Y.; Hattori, A.; et al. Feasibility and efficacy of salvage lung resection after definitive chemoradiation therapy for Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2016, 23, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickhoff, C.; Dahele, M.; Paul, M.A.; van de Ven, P.M.; de Langen, A.J.; Senan, S.; Smit, E.F.; Hartemink, K.J. Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence or persistent tumor after high dose chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2016, 94, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickhoff, C.; Otten, R.H.J.; Heymans, M.W.; Dahele, M. Salvage surgery for recurrent or persistent tumour after radical (chemo)radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2018, 10, 1758835918804150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froeschl, S.; Nicholas, G.; Gallant, V.; Laurie, S.A. Outcomes of second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed extensive small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simone, C.B., 2nd; Bogart, J.A.; Cabrera, A.R.; Daly, M.E.; DeNunzio, N.J.; Detterbeck, F.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Gatschet, N.; Gore, E.; Jabbour, S.K.; et al. Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 10, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faivre-Finn, C.; Snee, M.; Ashcroft, L.; Appel, W.; Barlesi, F.; Bhatnagar, A.; Bezjak, A.; Cardenal, F.; Fournel, P.; Harden, S.; et al. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): An open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goto, K.; Ohe, Y.; Shibata, T.; Seto, T.; Takahashi, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Tanaka, H.; Takeda, K.; Nishio, M.; Mori, K.; et al. Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eckardt, J.R.; von Pawel, J.; Pujol, J.L.; Papai, Z.; Quoix, E.; Ardizzoni, A.; Poulin, R.; Preston, A.J.; Dane, G.; Ross, G. Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 2086–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Pawel, J.; Jotte, R.; Spigel, D.R.; O’Brien, M.E.; Socinski, M.A.; Mezger, J.; Steins, M.; Bosquée, L.; Bubis, J.; Nackaerts, K.; et al. Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 4012–4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Motas, N.; Manolache, V.; Scarci, M.; Nimigean, V.; Nimigean, V.R.; Simion, L.; Mizea, M.C.; Trifanescu, O.G.; Galateanu, B.; Gherghe, M.; et al. Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Literature Review. Cancers 2023, 15, 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082241
Motas N, Manolache V, Scarci M, Nimigean V, Nimigean VR, Simion L, Mizea MC, Trifanescu OG, Galateanu B, Gherghe M, et al. Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Literature Review. Cancers. 2023; 15(8):2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082241
Chicago/Turabian StyleMotas, Natalia, Veronica Manolache, Marco Scarci, Victor Nimigean, Vanda Roxana Nimigean, Laurentiu Simion, Madalina Cristiana Mizea, Oana Gabriela Trifanescu, Bianca Galateanu, Mirela Gherghe, and et al. 2023. "Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Literature Review" Cancers 15, no. 8: 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082241
APA StyleMotas, N., Manolache, V., Scarci, M., Nimigean, V., Nimigean, V. R., Simion, L., Mizea, M. C., Trifanescu, O. G., Galateanu, B., Gherghe, M., Capsa, C. M., Gonzalez-Rivas, D., & Davidescu, M. D. (2023). Salvage Surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer—A Literature Review. Cancers, 15(8), 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082241