Next Article in Journal
Methotrexate Chemotherapy Causes Growth Impairments, Vitamin D Deficiency, Bone Loss, and Altered Intestinal Metabolism—Effects of Calcitriol Supplementation
Previous Article in Journal
Muscle and Adipose Wasting despite Disease Control: Unaddressed Side Effects of Palliative Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sex Differences in Vestibular Schwannoma

Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology, Eberhard Karls University, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(17), 4365; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174365
Submission received: 8 August 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Vestibular schwannomas can significantly affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients pre- and postoperatively. The impact of sex on symptom- and disease-specific aspects (i.e., facial function, hearing, tinnitus, vertigo) of quality of life has not been adequately investigated. The present study analyzed the sex-specific quality of life by surveying 260 vestibular schwannoma patients pre- and postoperatively. The results demonstrated that women were significantly more affected by dizziness, headaches, anxiety, and postoperative facial palsy. However, despite the greater physical impairment, general health improved equivalently or even more in female patients than in males postoperatively. These sex differences should be considered when counseling and managing patients.

Abstract

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) are equally common in men and woman. A number of epidemiological studies have reported on sex-specific aspects of incidence, tumor size, tinnitus and hearing loss. However, data on sex-specific, pre- and post-surgically quality of life (QoL) are rare. The objective of the present study was to determine sex-specific aspects on QoL in VS. Health-related QoL was analyzed in 260 patients (112 male/148 female) with unilateral sporadic VS using general (SF-36: general Short-Form Health Survey), disease-specific (PANQOL: Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale, PANQOL) and symptom-specific (DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory; HHI: Hearing Handicap Inventory; THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; FDI: Facial Disability Index) QoL questionnaires. Sex differences were evaluated pre- and postoperative by multi- and univariate analyses based on 200 preoperative and 88 postoperative questionnaires. Female patients were significantly more affected by dizziness, headaches, reduced energy and anxiety. Energy and balance changed similarly in both sexes after surgery. However, postoperative women tended to be more affected by facial palsy and headaches than men. Despite the greater physical impairment, general health improved equivalently or even more in female patients than in males. In conclusion, self-rated QoL in VS is significantly affected by sex and surgery. This should be taken into account when counseling VS patients regarding observation, radiotherapy, and surgery.

1. Introduction

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign, slow-growing tumors of the vestibulocochlear nerve that—like other schwannomas—develop from Schwann cells, which are responsible for producing the protective myelin sheath around nerves. While schwannomas can occur anywhere within the body, they are most commonly localized at the head, neck, and flexor surfaces of the extremities. Although mostly non-cancerous, schwannomas may cause symptoms depending on their location including pain, numbness, tingling or weakness [1,2,3]. In this context, VS are commonly diagnosed due to a progressive loss of cranial nerve functions (i.e., hearing loss, tinnitus or dizziness) [4,5,6,7]. While historically an incidence rate of approx. 1/100,000 was assumed, more recent studies have shown changes in incidence as well as tumor size, patient age, and sex distribution at diagnosis [7,8,9]. In the past, VS were thought to primarily affect women, with larger tumors in women than in men at the time of diagnosis. Hormonal influences during menstruation and pregnancy have been discussed as a reason for this sex difference, but could not be confirmed [10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown not only that VS are diagnosed at a smaller size nowadays (due to improved screening protocols for asymmetric hearing loss and better access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [14]), but also that the incidence is equally distributed between men and women [8]. The fact that tumors are detected even at smaller stages has led to management becoming more patient-focused and less aggressive in recent decades. In addition to surgery, radiosurgery or a watchful waiting are now increasingly preferred [14]. The criteria for deciding among the available treatment options are typically tumor size, patient age and hearing ability [15]. Sex differences are usually not considered during decision making. However, in recent years the attention on sex-related differences in physiopathology, clinical manifestations and therapy of diseases is rising. Gender medicine does not represent a new discipline, but rather provides a new perspective on existing disciplines. In this context, previous studies demonstrated that “gender”/sex (terms are often used interchangeably) is an independent factor influencing the length of hospital stay after VS resection, with women’s average length of stay being significantly longer than that of men [16]. This may be attributed to the occurrence of vertigo and dizziness, which have been shown to affect women more than men in VS [16,17,18]. In contrast, studies inconsistently report about sex differences in the prevalence of hearing loss and tinnitus [8,19,20]. Furthermore, studies on sex-specific, patient-reported quality of life (QoL) of patients with VS are rare. However, QoL in VS can be significantly impacted due to the physical symptoms with affection of a person’s ability to communicate, work, and participate in social activities, but also by emotional and psychological distress (i.e., anxiety, depression). Due to this, the aim of this study was to investigate sex-specific QoL and related coping strategies in VS patients pre- and postoperative.

2. Methods

2.1. Demographics and Patient Characteristics

This cross-sectional study enrolled 260 patients (112 male/148 female; Table 1) with unilateral sporadic VS treated at our Neurosurgical Department between November 2019 and October 2022. Patients answered standardized questionnaires on QoL as part of a routine diagnostic. Microsurgical resection of the VS was performed in a total of 165/260 (63.5%) patients during or before the above-mentioned period using a retrosigmoid–transmeatal approach in a supine or a semi-sitting position in all cases. Patients with neurofibromatosis, previous external tumor resection or radiosurgery and incomplete questionnaires were excluded from further data analyses. The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the ethics committee of the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen (approval number 403/2021B02) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.
In addition to QoL questionnaires, we recorded numerous patient- and disease-specific characteristics. Facial function was graded according to the House–Brackmann score (HB), which classifies overall facial function into ranges from 1 (normal) to 6 (total paralysis) based on the assessment of, e.g., eye closure, mouth and forehead movement [21]. Tumor side and size according to the Koos classification (1: purely intrameatal, 2: intra- and extrameatal, 3: filling the cerebellopontine cistern, 4: compressing or shifting the brainstem) were retrospectively analyzed by inspection of the MRI [22].

2.2. Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires

We routinely administered several quality-of-life surveys during the outpatient presentation or inpatient admission in our department, as previously described [23]: the disease-specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL), the general Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as well as the symptom-specific Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Facial Disability Index (FDI).
The PANQOL consists of 26 questions, which can be answered by the patient on a Likert scale from strong agreement (5) to strong disagreement (1). Answers of the 7 domains general health (PAN-GH), pain (PAN-PAIN), anxiety (PAN-ANX), energy (PAN-ENGY), balance (PAN-BAL), facial function (PAN-FACE) and hearing (PAN-HEAR) are normalized to a scale of 0 (lowest QoL) to 100 (best possible QoL) points to determine the domain scores. Additionally, a sum score (PAN-TTL; ranging also from 0–100) can be generated from the domain scores.
The SF-36 has 36 self-assessment items estimating general QoL. The items can be categorized into the domains general health (SF36-GH), physical function (SF36-PF), social function (SF36-SF), role-physical (SF36-RP), role-emotional (SF36-RE), mental health (SF36-MH), vitality (SF36-VT) and bodily pain (SF36-BP). The answers of each domain can be converted into a score from 0–100, with a lower score corresponding to a lower QoL. Sum scores can be calculated by using the domain values, a population-based Z-score standardization and a T-score transformation. As population scores for VS do not significantly differ between the German and U.S. population, the scores of the U.S. population were used in the present study for better comparability [24].
Symptom-specific QoL was assessed by the THI, DHI and HHI. Patients have to answer 25 items in each survey ((yes (2), sometimes (1) or no (0)), which address problems due to tinnitus, dizziness and hearing function. A total score of 0–100 can be calculated, whereby a lower score indicates a better QoL. Furthermore, all patients with facial palsy were evaluated with the FDI, which contains 10 self-assessment questions. These survey items can be categorized into physical function (FDI-PF) and social function (FDI-SF). Domain scores range up to 100 points, which represents the best symptom-specific QoL.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used to perform all statistical analyses. Differences between groups (i.e., women versus men) regarding the distribution of clinical attributes such as tumor side, tumor size and patients’ age were evaluated by Chi-squared or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) were performed to evaluate the effects of SEX and pre- and postoperative groups (SURG) on QoL scores in consideration of the covariates AGE and tumor SIZE. The data were first examined for outliers and homogeneity (Levene’s test). Subsequently, a MANCOVA was performed in a two-level analysis: after testing the overall hypothesis (i.e., is there a difference between the groups?), follow-up analyses (i.e., univariate ANOVAs) were conducted to explain the group differences. Furthermore, correlation analyses were performed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 for each statistical test. The results are presented as mean ± SEM.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 260 VS patients (52.5 ± 12.5 years, 148 female) completed all QoL questionnaires (Table 1). The cohort involved similarly small (Koos 1/2: 119/260, 45.8%) and large (Koos 3/4: 146/260, 56.2%) as well as left- (137/260, 52.7%) and right-sided (123/260, 47.3%) vestibular schwannomas. In 165/260 (63.5%) patients, the VS was resected, while 95/260 (36.5%) had not undergone surgery at the time of evaluation. Tumor size correlated significantly with the decision for surgery (r = 0.62, p < 0.001, Spearman’s), i.e., Koos 3/4 tumors were resected more frequently than Koos 1/2 VS. There were no differences between age, tumor size or frequency of performed surgeries between male and female patients. Furthermore, the time between VS diagnosis and date of preoperative survey (time since diagnosis, TSD) and the time between surgery and date of postoperative QoL survey (time since surgery, TSS) differed not between sexes. However, the affected side differed significantly between sexes (t(241) = −2.02, p = 0.045). While in men VS were predominantly located on the left side (67/112, 59.8%), in women the number of tumors on the right side (78/148, 52.7%) exceeded the number on the left side (70/148, 47.3%).

3.2. Sex Differences in General and Disease-Related QoL: SF-36 and PANQOL

Based on a total of 288 questionnaires (200 preoperative, 88 postoperative), we performed a MANCOVA to analyze the impact of SEX and SURG on PANQOL while controlling for AGE and SIZE. A significant multivariate main effect was found for SEX (F(7,276) = 5.20, p < 0.001) and SURG (F(7,276) = 8.63, p < 0.001). Female patients suffered significantly more from balance problems (PAN-BAL: 65.73 ± 24.5 vs. 75.85 ± 22.0; F(1,288) = 11.70, p = 0.001) and headaches (PAN-PAIN: 62.86 ± 31.1 vs. 73.44 ± 28.0; F(1,288) = 11.90, p = 0.001), as well as decreased energy (PAN-ENGY: 64.18 ± 24.6 vs. 72.0 ± 21.1; F(1,288) = 6.53, p = 0.011) and anxiety (PAN-ANX: 63.24 ± 21.8 vs. 72.9 ± 23.0; F(1,288) = 11.24, p = 0.001) in comparison to males. Furthermore, females were more affected by facial impairment (PAN-FACE: 82.12 ± 20.5 vs. 88.0 ± 16.8; F(1,288) = 10.30, p = 0.001) although postoperative HB differed not between sexes (Table 1). Thereby, postoperative HB correlated significantly with PAN-FACE in both men (r = −0.61, p < 0.001; Spearman’s) and women (r = −0.75, p < 0.001; Spearman’s). Although the difference in hearing impairment pre- vs. postoperatively was greater in women than in men, this did not reach significance. SURG had a significant main effect on PAN-ANX (64.78 ± 23.0 vs. 73.71 ± 21.2; F(1,288) = 8.22, p = 0.004), PAN-FACE (89.12 ± 14.3 vs. 74.75 ± 24.4; F(1,288) = 28.75, p < 0.001) and PAN-GH (55.0 ± 17.1 vs. 64.16 ± 19.4; F(1,288) = 6.22, p = 0.013). Notably, general health and anxiety improved postoperatively despite a facial deterioration (Figure 1). MANCOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of SEX*SURG on PANQOL (F(7,276) = 2.55, p = 0.015) with a significant impact on PAN-FACE (F(1,288) = 4.37, p = 0.038) with worse values postoperative and in females in follow-up ANOVAs.
PANQOL was significant affected by the covariates AGE (F(7,276) = 4.96, p < 0.001) and SIZE (F(7,276) = 2.13, p = 0.041). QoL was more influenced by anxiety in younger patients (PAN-ANX: F(1,288) = 4.67, p = 0.031) than in the elderly. However, separate sex-specific correlation analyses could not reveal significant correlations between AGE and PAN-ANX neither for pre-/postoperative nor female/male. In contrast, increasing AGE had a negative effect on balance (PAN-BAL: F(1,288) = 8.59, p = 0.004), hearing (PAN-HEAR: F(1,288) = 6.72, p = 0.010) and facial function (PAN-FACE: F(1,288) = 7.40, p = 0.007). Post hoc, sex-specific correlation analyses detected significant correlations between AGE and PAN-BAL in the postoperative female cohort (r = −0.28, p = 0.043; Spearman’s) and preoperative male patients (r = −0.27, p = 0.010; Spearman’s) (Figure 2). PAN-GH (F(1,288) = 7.03, p = 0.008) and PAN-ENGY (F(1,288) = 4.59, p = 0.033) were significantly influenced by the SIZE with better values in large tumors (PAN-ENGY: r = 0.13, p = 0.025; PAN-GH: r = 0.23, p < 0.001).
The MANCOVA applied to the SF36 subdomains with the same factors and covariates demonstrated a significant effect only for AGE (F(7,275) = 3.55, p = 0.001). Follow-up ANOVAs confirmed a significant impact on SF36-PF (F(1,288) = 10.05, p = 0.002) and SF36-GH (F(1,288) = 4.85, p = 0.029), both decreasing with increasing age.

3.3. Symptom-Specific Sex Differences: HHI, THI, DHI and FDI

A MANCOVA was performed to determine the effects of SEX and SURG on the handicap inventories (i.e., DHI, HHI and THI) (Figure 3). While SEX (F(3,280) = 9.73, p < 0.001) demonstrated a significant impact on DHI (21.56 ± 1.7 vs. 11.84 ± 1.9; F(1,288) = 16.06, p < 0.001) with more dizziness in female patients, SURG (F(3,280) = 5.17, p = 0.002) affected hearing function (19.96 ± 21.6 vs. 28.50 ± 21.7; F(1,288) = 8.75, p = 0.003) and DHI (14.34 ± 19.3 vs. 19.57 ± 21.1; F(1,288) = 6.04, p = 0.001) with worse values postoperative. AGE (F(3,280) = 9.73, p < 0.001) affected HHI (F(1,288) = 3.93, p = 0.048) with a negative effect in the elderly. Tinnitus was only affected by the SIZE (F(1,288) = 5.69, p = 0.018).
Surgery (SURG) negatively affected both the FDI subscores physical (FDI-PH; F(1,288) = 51.57, p < 0.001) and social disability (FDI-SH; F(1,288) = 32.32, p < 0.001) of facial palsy. However, SEX, AGE or SIZE had no effect on the FDI.

4. Discussion

Gender medicine does not represent a new discipline, but rather offers a new perspective on existing disciplines respecting sex differences on pathophysiology, symptoms, prevention and therapy of diseases [25,26]. Important sex differences have already been identified in cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and pharmacokinetic properties [25]. However, sex-specific data in vestibular schwannomas are rare. In this context, we demonstrated numerous sex differences of symptom-specific and mental QoL in VS, with women being more affected than men. Notably, despite symptom-related deterioration mainly caused by increased dizziness and facial nerve impairment, female patients reported a greater postoperative improvement in general health (PAN-GH). This improvement reached “minimal clinically important difference” (MCID) reported in the literature [27]. Hence, sex differences should be considered when counseling patients with VS offering more psychological support and dizziness/balance training especially for women.
Recent studies on vestibular diseases in general (e.g., benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Mèniere disease, vestibular neuritis) and on VS-related vertigo in particular, have shown, consistent with our study, that women are more affected by dizziness than men [18,28]. Hormonal causes are suspected as the reason for this sex difference, since it was shown that postmenopausal women were more frequently affected by vestibular disorders. Furthermore, studies reported that patients who received hormone replacement therapy (e.g., in the context of osteoporosis) had fewer vestibular disorders [29,30]. The concept of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal VS patients with vertigo should be further investigated in the future—especially after previous studies could not confirm a hormonal influence on VS growth and our data demonstrated more balance problems in older women after surgery [11,13]. In this context, as a first step, a pre- and postoperative investigation of hormone levels and their fluctuations based on blood tests would be interesting to investigate the correlation with clinical symptoms (e.g., measured by questionnaires or use of an online digital diary for symptom monitoring by patients). In case of a correlation, a further step could be the substitution of hormone medications in patients with low hormone levels.
The facial deterioration rate after VS resection has been reported in the literature to be ~35%, with the tumor size as the most important predictive factor [31,32,33]. We demonstrated that female patients were significantly more affected by the manifestation of facial nerve palsy than males. The MCID, which is specified as 10 points for the PAN-FACE [27], was reached between sexes. The detected sex difference is consistent with both etiology-independent and VS-specific studies on the occurrence of facial palsy [34,35,36]. The reasons for this are possibly a higher demand on appearance in women, which leads to a greater distress and self-consciousness with anxiety and depression at the occurrence of facial palsy. Different coping strategies for women and men must also be discussed in this context. Studies often report about a predominance of problem-focused coping (i.e., try to change or eliminate a stressor) in men, while women typically use emotion-focused coping skills (i.e., try to manage emotional response to the stressor) [37,38]. Women therefore seek social support (e.g., turn to friends and relatives). Accordingly, the limited QoL in facial palsy in women compared to men may be due to the fact that women avoid social contacts according to their poor appearance and thus lose a coping strategy. However, this assumption needs to be discussed because, (i) problem-focused coping predominates in women with primary brain tumors, but also during the Gulf crisis [39,40], (ii) in patients with facial paresis of different etiologies, emotion-focused coping has been shown to improve anxiety and depression more than problem-focused coping, and (iii) despite a postoperative increase in facial impairment, our data showed an improvement of the PAN-ANX score [41]. Hence, current data related to VS-associated facial palsies are insufficient to make a conclusive assessment in this context. Further studies focusing on different coping strategies preoperatively and postoperatively in VS should be performed in the future.
Anxiety disorders are more common in women than in men [42,43]. In accordance, our data as well as further studies on brain tumor patients showed a sex difference in the occurrence of anxiety and distress, with women being more affected [44]. In line with the already described impact on vertigo, hormonal differences are considered to be a potential cause of the disparity. Thus, anxiety disorders are more common in postmenopausal than in younger women [43,45]. Animal studies suggest that a loss of estrogen is a predictor of anxiety disorders [46]. In contrast, our MANCOVA revealed higher anxiety-scores (PAN-ANX) in younger patients than in elderly patients. However, separate sex-specific correlation analyses could not reveal significant correlations between AGE and PAN-ANX. Instead, in both sexes we demonstrated a decrease in anxiety postoperatively. This improvement was more pronounced in women and is concordant with previous studies in meningiomas and benign tumors that demonstrated increased anxiety during watchful waiting [47,48]. This improvement in anxiety may also be contributory to the improvement in general health (PAN-GH), which was demonstrated despite the deterioration in symptom-specific QoL, and should consequently be taken into account when making treatment decisions.

Limitations

The present study is limited in particular by the small number of postoperative questionnaires and the absence of a longitudinal follow-up. The sex-specific analyses refer only to observed and operated VS patients. Statements on patients treated by radiosurgery cannot be made. Furthermore, demographic aspects such as education level, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, relationship status, or treatment of psychological impairments (i.e., psychological and psychiatric co-care) were not included in the analysis.

5. Conclusions

Reviewing the quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients from the perspective of gender medicine reveals sex differences in the occurrence of and coping with vertigo, facial nerve palsy, and anxiety. Attending physicians should take this into account when providing pre- and postoperative counseling and treatment to VS patients. Furthermore, additional studies should be conducted to investigate the correlation between hormone levels and symptoms as well as coping strategies in VS.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: K.M. and G.N.; data acquisition: K.M., L.O. and S.S.W.; data analysis: G.N. and K.M.; data interpretation: K.M., S.S.W., M.T. and G.N.; statistical analysis: K.M. and G.N.; writing of the first draft: K.M. and G.N.; review of the final manuscript: K.M., M.T. and G.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the institutional review board and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory; FDI: Facial Disability Index; GTR: gross total resection; HB: House-Brackmann scale; HHI: Hearing Handicap Inventory; MCID: minimal clinically important difference; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PANQOL: Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale; PR: partial resection; QoL: quality of life; SF-36: general Short-Form Health Survey; STR: subtotal resection; THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; TSD: time since diagnosis; TSS: time since surgery; VS: vestibular schwannoma.

References

  1. Aboh, I.V.; Chisci, G.; Cascino, F.; Parigi, S.; Gennaro, P.; Gabriele, G.; Iannetti, G. Giant palatal schwannoma. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2014, 25, e418–e420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Agrawal, A.; Singh, V.; Rohilla, S.; Sharma, B. Trigeminal schwannoma. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 8, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Harazono, Y.; Kayamori, K.; Sakamoto, J.; Akaike, Y.; Kurasawa, Y.; Tsushima, F.; Sasaki, Y.; Harada, H.; Yoda, T. Retrospective analysis of schwannoma in the oral and maxillofacial region: Clinicopathological characteristics and specific pathology of ancient change. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 60, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nilsen, K.S.; Lund-Johansen, M.; Nordahl, S.H.G.; Finnkirk, M.; Goplen, F.K. Long-term Effects of Conservative Management of Vestibular Schwannoma on Dizziness, Balance, and Caloric Function. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2019, 161, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sughrue, M.E.; Kane, A.J.; Kaur, R.; Barry, J.J.; Rutkowski, M.J.; Pitts, L.H.; Cheung, S.W.; Parsa, A.T. A prospective study of hearing preservation in untreated vestibular schwannomas: Clinical article. J. Neurosurg. 2011, 114, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sughrue, M.E.; Yang, I.; Aranda, D.; Lobo, K.; Pitts, L.H.; Cheung, S.W.; Parsa, A.T. The natural history of untreated sporadic vestibular schwannomas: A comprehensive review of hearing outcomes—Clinical article. J. Neurosurg. 2010, 112, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stangerup, S.E.; Caye-Thomasen, P. Epidemiology and Natural History of Vestibular Schwannomas. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 45, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reznitsky, M.; Petersen, M.M.B.S.; West, N.; Stangerup, S.E.; Cayé-Thomasen, P. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Characteristics of Vestibular Schwannomas-Does Gender Matter? Otol. Neurotol. 2020, 41, e1372–e1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marinelli, J.P.; Lohse, C.M.; Carlson, M.L. Incidence of Vestibular Schwannoma over the Past Half-Century: A Population-Based Study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2018, 159, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brown, C.M.; Ahmad, Z.K.; Ryan, A.F.; Doherty, J.K. Estrogen receptor expression in sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Otol. Neurotol. 2011, 32, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kachhara, R.; Chandrika Devi, C.G.; Nair, S.; Bhattacharya, R.N.; Radhakrishnan, V.V. Acoustic neurinomas during pregnancy: Report of two cases and review of literature. Acta Neurochir. 2001, 143, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaiswal, S.; Agrawal, V.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Pandey, R.; Mahapatra, A.K. Expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in vestibular schwannomas and their clinical significance. J. Negat. Results Biomed. 2009, 8, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dalgorf, D.M.; Rowsell, C.; Bilbao, J.M.; Chen, J.M. Immunohistochemical investigation of hormone receptors and vascular endothelial growth factor concentration in vestibular schwannoma. Skull Base 2008, 18, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goldbrunner, R.; Weller, M.; Regis, J.; Lund-Johansen, M.; Stavrinou, P.; Reuss, D.; Evans, D.G.; Lefranc, F.; Sallabanda, K.; Falini, A.; et al. Eano guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neuro-oncology 2020, 22, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sergi, B.; Settimi, S.; Federici, G.; Galloni, C.; Cantaffa, C.; De Corso, E.; Lucidi, D. Factors Influencing Personalized Management of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vorasubin, N.; Alexander, T.H.; Mastrodimos, B.; Cueva, R.A. Factors that affect length of hospital stay after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol. Neurotol. 2018, 39, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rosahl, S.; Bohr, C.; Lell, M.; Hamm, K.; Iro, H. Diagnostics and therapy of vestibular schwannomas—An interdisciplinary challenge. GMS Curr. Top. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2017, 16, Doc03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feigl, G.C.; Schebesch, K.M.; Rochon, J.; Warnat, J.; Woertgen, C.; Schmidt, S.; Lange, M.; Schlaier, J.; Brawanski, A.T. Analysis of risk factors influencing the development of severe dizziness in patients with vestibular schwannomas in the immediate postoperative phase. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2011, 113, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, W.; Hou, Z.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Shen, W.; Yang, S. Larger tumor size and female gender suggest better tinnitus prognosis after surgical treatment in vestibular schwannoma patients with tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020, 140, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naros, G.; Sandritter, J.; Liebsch, M.; Ofori, A.; Rizk, A.R.; Del Moro, G.; Ebner, F.; Tatagiba, M. Predictors of preoperative tinnitus in unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. House, J.W.; Brackmann, D.E. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 1985, 93, 146–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erickson, N.J.; Schmalz, P.G.R.; Agee, B.S.; Fort, M.; Walters, B.C.; McGrew, B.M.; Fisher, W.S. Koos Classification of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Reliability Study. Clin. Neurosurg. 2019, 85, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Machetanz, K.; Lee, L.; Wang, S.S.; Tatagiba, M.; Naros, G. Trading mental and physical health in vestibular schwannoma treatment decision. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1152833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ware, J.E.; Gandek, B.; Kosinski, M.; Aaronson, N.K.; Apolone, G.; Brazier, J.; Bullinger, M.; Kaasa, S.; Leplège, A.; Prieto, L.; et al. The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998, 51, 1167–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baggio, G.; Corsini, A.; Floreani, A.; Giannini, S.; Zagonel, V. Gender medicine: A task for the third millennium. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2013, 51, 713–727. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Editorial: Putting gender on the agenda. Nature 2010, 465, 665. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carlson, M.L.; Tveiten, O.V.; Driscoll, C.L.; Goplen, F.K.; Neff, B.A.; Pollock, B.E.; Tombers, N.M.; Castner, M.L.; Finnkirk, M.K.; Myrseth, E.; et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma: An international multicenter cross-sectional study comparing microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, observation, and nontumor controls. J. Neurosurg. 2015, 122, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hülse, R.; Biesdorf, A.; Hörmann, K.; Stuck, B.; Erhart, M.; Hülse, M.; Wenzel, A. Peripheral Vestibular Disorders: An Epidemiologic Survey in 70 Million Individuals. Otol. Neurotol. 2019, 40, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mucci, V.; Hamid, M.; Jacquemyn, Y.; Browne, C.J. Influence of sex hormones on vestibular disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2022, 35, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Orendorz-Frączkowska, K.; Temporale, H. Organ of hearing and balance in peri- And postmenopausal women. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on hearing and balance in peri- And post-menopausal women- And current state of knowledge. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020, 29, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Falcioni, M.; Fois, P.; Taibah, A.; Sanna, M. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery: Clinical article. J. Neurosurg. 2011, 115, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Matthies, C.; Samii, M. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): Clinical presentation. Neurosurgery 1997, 40, 1–9; discussion 9–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Ebner, F.H.; Tatagiba, M. Update on diagnostics and microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Nervenarzt 2019, 90, 578–586. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hotton, M.; Huggons, E.; Hamlet, C.; Shore, D.; Johnson, D.; Norris, J.H.; Kilcoyne, S.; Dalton, L. The psychosocial impact of facial palsy: A systematic review. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 695–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nellis, J.C.; Ishii, M.; Byrne, P.J.; Boahene, K.D.O.; Dey, J.K.; Ishii, L.E. Association among facial paralysis, depression, and quality of life in facial plastic surgery patients. JAMA Facial Plast. Surg. 2017, 19, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cross, T.; Sheard, C.E.; Garrud, P.; Nikolopoulos, T.P.; O’Donoghue, G.M. Impact of facial paralysis on patients with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 2000, 110, 1539–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lazarus, R.S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping—Richard S. Lazarus, PhD, Susan Folkman, PhD—Google Books. Available online: https://books.google.com.gh/books?hl=en&lr=&id=i-ySQQuUpr8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Stress,+Appraisal+and+Coping&ots=DgIOlnjdU9&sig=sYA22n-S60dvW8x5QjaEeEZ7p1U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Stress%2C%20Appraisal%20and%20Coping&f=true (accessed on 14 February 2023).
  38. Matud, M.P. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2004, 37, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ben-Zur, H.; Zeidner, M. Gender differences in coping reactions under community crisis and daily routine conditions. Pers. Individ. Differ. 1996, 20, 331–340. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liang, S.Y.; Liu, H.C.; Lu, Y.Y.; Wu, S.F.; Chien, C.H.; Tsay, S.L. The Influence of Resilience on the Coping Strategies in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors. Asian Nurs. Res. 2020, 14, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Siemann, I.; Kleiss, I.; Beurskens, C.; Custers, J.; Kwakkenbos, L. ‘Everybody is watching me’: A closer look at anxiety in people with facial palsy. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2023, 77, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kessler, R.C.; McGonagle, K.A.; Zhao, S.; Nelson, C.B.; Hughes, M.; Eshleman, S.; Wittchen, H.U.; Kendler, K.S. Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1994, 51, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Seeman, M.V. Psychopathology in women and men: Focus on female hormones. Am. J. Psychiatry 1997, 154, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mainio, A.; Hakko, H.; Niemelä, A.; Tuurinkoski, T.; Koivukangas, J.; Räsänen, P. The effect of brain tumour laterality on anxiety levels among neurosurgical patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2003, 74, 1278–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Niemelä, A.; Koivukangas, J.; Herva, R.; Hakko, H.; Räsänen, P.; Mainio, A. Gender Difference in Quality of Life among Brain Tumor Survivors. J. Neurol. Neurophysiol. 2011, 2, 2155–9562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zimmerberg, B.; Farley, M.J. Sex differences in anxiety behavior in rats: Role of gonadal hormones. Physiol. Behav. 1993, 54, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kalasauskas, D.; Keric, N.; Ajaj, S.A.; von Cube, L.; Ringel, F.; Renovanz, M. Psychological burden in meningioma patients under a wait-and-watch strategy and after complete resection is high—Results of a prospective single center study. Cancers 2020, 12, 3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Goebel, S.; Mehdorn, H.M. Development of anxiety and depression in patients with benign intracranial meningiomas: A prospective long-term study. Support. Care Cancer 2013, 21, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Disease-specific gender differences pre- and postoperative analyzed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL); PAN-ENGY: PANQOL energy; PAN-ANX: PANQOL anxiety; PANQOL-GH: PANQOL general health; PAN-FACE: PANQOL facial; PAN-HEAR: PANQOL hearing; PAN-BAL: PANQOL balance; PAN-PAIN: PANQOL pain. Cancers 15 04365 i001 indicates significant differences between genders. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Figure 1. Disease-specific gender differences pre- and postoperative analyzed by the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale (PANQOL); PAN-ENGY: PANQOL energy; PAN-ANX: PANQOL anxiety; PANQOL-GH: PANQOL general health; PAN-FACE: PANQOL facial; PAN-HEAR: PANQOL hearing; PAN-BAL: PANQOL balance; PAN-PAIN: PANQOL pain. Cancers 15 04365 i001 indicates significant differences between genders. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Cancers 15 04365 g001
Figure 2. Age-related differences of balance (PAN-BAL). While there was a significant correlation between AGE and PAN-BAL in the male cohort preoperatively (A), postoperative women demonstrated more balance problems with increasing AGE (B). * indicates a significant correlation age and PAN-BAL. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Figure 2. Age-related differences of balance (PAN-BAL). While there was a significant correlation between AGE and PAN-BAL in the male cohort preoperatively (A), postoperative women demonstrated more balance problems with increasing AGE (B). * indicates a significant correlation age and PAN-BAL. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Cancers 15 04365 g002
Figure 3. Symptom-specific gender-differences pre- and postoperative. (A) Women were significantly more affected by dizziness (DHI) than men, while no gender-differences were detected for HHI and THI; (B) facial function decreased postoperative in both genders with women more affected; (C) postoperative HB scores demonstrated no differences between genders (H = 0.01, p = 0.930; Kruskal–Wallis); HHI: Hearing Handicap Inventory, DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory, THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; Cancers 15 04365 i001 indicates significant differences between genders. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Figure 3. Symptom-specific gender-differences pre- and postoperative. (A) Women were significantly more affected by dizziness (DHI) than men, while no gender-differences were detected for HHI and THI; (B) facial function decreased postoperative in both genders with women more affected; (C) postoperative HB scores demonstrated no differences between genders (H = 0.01, p = 0.930; Kruskal–Wallis); HHI: Hearing Handicap Inventory, DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory, THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; Cancers 15 04365 i001 indicates significant differences between genders. Blue lines: male; orange lines: female.
Cancers 15 04365 g003
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Total Cohort
n = 260
Preoperative Quest.
n = 200
Postoperative Quest.
n = 88
112 Male/
148 Female
Male
n = 91
Female
n = 109
Male
n = 37
Female
n = 51
Age 52.60 +/− 12.753.0 +/− 12.4 50.59 +/− 11.750.43 +/− 11.6
Koos
1
2
3
4

43 (16.5%)
76 (29.2%)
81 (31.2%)
60 (23.1%)

16 (17.6%)
36 (39.6%)
26 (28.6%)
13 (14.3%)

26 (23.9%)
31 (28.4%)
33 (30.3%)
19 (17.4%)

H = 0.02
p = 0.892

1 (2.7%)
5 (13.5%)
16 (43.2%)
15 (40.5%)

1 (2.0%)
9 (17.6%)
20 (39.2%)
21 (41.2%)

H = 0.01
p = 0.913
Side
Left/
Right

137 (52.7%)
123 (47.3%)

56 (61.5%)
35 (38.5%)

55 (50.5%)
54 (49.5%)

X2 = 2.47
p = 0.116

18 (48.6%)
19 (51.4%)

21 (41.2%)
30 (58.8%)

X2 = 0.49
p = 0.486
Operation
Yes
No

165 (63.5%)
95 (36.5%)

45 (49.5%)
46 (50.5%)

50 (45.9%)
59 (54.1%)

X2 = 0.04
p = 0.847

37 (100%)
0

51 (100%)
0

X2 = 0
p = 1
TSD/TSS 1.23 +/− 2.3 y1.16 +/− 2.2 yH = 0.25
p = 0.615
1.48 +/− 2.1 y2.37 +/− 3.1H = 0.14
p = 0.137
HB
I
II
III
IV
V


89 (97.8%)
2 (2.2%)
0
0
0

104 (95.4%)
5 (4.6%)
0
0
0

H = 83
p = 0.361

20 (54.1%)
7 (18.9%)
5 (13.5%)
4 (10.8%)
1 (2.7%)

28 (54.9%)
11 (21.6%)
5 (9.8%)
3 (5.9%)
4 (7.8%)

H = 0.01
p = 0.930
EOR
GTR
STR
PR

64 (72.7%)
19 (21.6%)
5 (5.7%)

-
-
-

-
-
-

25 (67.6%)
8 (21.6%)
4 (10.8%)

39 (76.5%)
11 (21.6%)
1 (2.0%)

X2 = 3.19
p = 0.203
SF-36
physical function
role physical
bodily pain
general health
vitality
social function
role emotional
mental health


89.78 ± 17.7
75.27 ± 36.6
76.45 ± 27.8
63.87 ± 17.5
58.52 ± 19.9
77.20 ± 25.2
73.35 ± 40.1
69.71 ± 19.3

81.06 +/− 24.2
64.45 +/− 42.3
66.58 +/− 30.8
59.73 +/− 17.6
52.16 +/− 20.5
70.64 +/− 25.8
65.14 +/− 41.7
64.62 +/− 17.9

p = 0.001 *
p = 0.067
p = 0.023 *
p = 0.097
p = 0.032 *
p = 0.053
p = 0.089
p = 0.043 *

86.89 +/− 16.6
72.16 +/− 33.6
80.46 +/− 27.0
66.08 +/− 19.6
59.65 +/− 16.7
78.11 +/− 21.9
84.01 +/− 29.9
75.89 +/− 18.7

78.76 +/− 21.7
60.00 +/− 41.2
71.57 +/− 30.2
65.24 +/− 19.2
55.53 +/− 24.0
73.97 +/− 26.7
70.59 +/− 43.5
69.65 +/− 20.5

p = 0.079
p = 0.256
p = 0.132
p = 0.879
p = 0.425
p = 0.579
p = 0.251
p = 0.129
PANQOL
anxiety
facial
general health
balance
hearing
energy
pain
Total


70.54 ± 22.9
90.57 ± 14.2
56.32 ± 19.0
76.69 ± 22.0
63.46 ± 22.5
71.98 ± 21.5
70.05 ± 28.9
71.37 ± 15.6

59.98 +/− 22.1
87.92 +/− 14.3
54.0 +/− 15.3
67.05 +/− 25.7
66.17 +/− 21.0
63.80 +/− 24.2
63.07 +/− 30.2
66.10 +/− 14.6

p = 0.001 *
p = 0.129
p = 0.267
p = 0.008 *
p = 0.332
p = 0.015 *
p = 0.086
p = 0.006 *

78.55 +/− 22.8
81.67 +/− 20.6
61.49 +/− 19.6
73.76 +/− 22.2
63.34 +/− 18.0
72.07 +/− 20.5
81.76 +/− 24.0
73.21 +/− 14.3

70.21 +/− 19.4
69.73 +/− 25.9
66.10 +/− 19.2
62.91 +/− 21.7
58.99 +/− 24.9
64.99 +/− 25.6
62.42 +/− 33.4
64.29 +/− 17.8

p = 0.027 *
p = 0.027 *
p = 0.420
p = 0.008 *
p = 0.468
p = 0.242
p = 0.006 *
p = 0.016 *
DHI 9.65 ± 16.318.26 +/− 20.8p = 0.001 *12.92 +/− 16.724.39 +/− 22.7p = 0.011 *
THI 19.41 ± 21.121.71 +/− 21.5p = 0.43115.51 +/− 18.120.20 +/− 22.3p = 0.432
HHI 20.59 ± 20.919.43 +/− 22.2p = 0.47329.68 +/−19.827.65 +/−23.1p = 0.475
FDI
physical function
social function

98.74 ± 10.5
97.89 ± 12.1

99.27 +/− 3.3
97.87 +/− 8.1

p = 0.319
p = 0.402

88.24 +/−16.5
88.22 +/−16.3

84.31 +/− 19.6
84.47 +/− 20.4

p = 0.382
p = 0.491
* p-values indicate significance comparing male and female by a Chi-square (X2) or Kruskal–Wallis test (H). FDI: Facial Disability Index; DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory; HB: House-Brackmann scale; HHI: Hearing Handicap Inventory; EOR: extent of resection; GTR: gross total resection; PANQOL: Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale; PR: partial resection; SF-36: general Short-Form Health Survey; STR: subtotal resection; THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; TSD: time since diagnosis; TSS: time since surgery; FDI: Facial Disability Index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machetanz, K.; Wang, S.S.; Oberle, L.; Tatagiba, M.; Naros, G. Sex Differences in Vestibular Schwannoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 4365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174365

AMA Style

Machetanz K, Wang SS, Oberle L, Tatagiba M, Naros G. Sex Differences in Vestibular Schwannoma. Cancers. 2023; 15(17):4365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machetanz, Kathrin, Sophie S. Wang, Linda Oberle, Marcos Tatagiba, and Georgios Naros. 2023. "Sex Differences in Vestibular Schwannoma" Cancers 15, no. 17: 4365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174365

APA Style

Machetanz, K., Wang, S. S., Oberle, L., Tatagiba, M., & Naros, G. (2023). Sex Differences in Vestibular Schwannoma. Cancers, 15(17), 4365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop