Next Article in Journal
Pathways Related to Colon Inflammation Are Associated with Colorectal Carcinoma: A Transcriptome- and Methylome-Wide Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Impact of Exercises on Quality-of-Life Improvement in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Biophysical Techniques to Cellular and Molecular Oncology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Breast Cancer: How Hippotherapy Bridges the Gap between Healing and Recovery—A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/cancers15112920
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of Tango Argentino for Cancer-Associated Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

by
Friedemann Schad
1,2,†,
Thomas Rieser
1,3,†,
Sarah Becker
4,
Jessica Groß
4,
Harald Matthes
1,3,5,
Shiao Li Oei
1,* and
Anja Thronicke
1,*
1
Research Institute Havelhöhe, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, 14089 Berlin, Germany
2
Interdisciplinary Oncology and Palliative Care, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, 14089 Berlin, Germany
3
Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
4
Breast Cancer Centre, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, 14089 Berlin, Germany
5
Institute for Gastroenterology, Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, 14089 Berlin, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2023, 15(11), 2920; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112920
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer Survivors and Supportive Therapies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Persistent impairments in quality of life, particularly in cancer-associated fatigue, are a major limitation for breast cancer survivors. As physical activity and mindfulness interventions have been shown to be effective, the question arose whether a supervised Argentine tango program may also reduce fatigue symptoms. Evaluation of the self-reported quality of life parameters revealed that quality of life, including fatigue, improved after six weekly one-hour tango sessions. The TANGO trial shows that an Argentine tango program may be an efficacious intervention to improve fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Abstract

Background: Persistent impairments of quality of life—in particular, cancer-associated fatigue—are a major limitation for breast cancer survivors. As physical activity and mindfulness interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue symptoms, we investigated the efficacy of a six-week Argentine tango program. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 breast cancer survivors diagnosed with stage I-III tumors 12–48 months prior to study enrollment and who had increased symptoms of fatigue. The participants were randomly assigned with a 1:1 allocation to either the tango or the waiting group. The treatment consisted of six weeks of supervised weekly one-hour tango group-sessions. Self-reported fatigue and further quality of life parameters were assessed at baseline and six weeks post-baseline. Longitudinal changes, correlations, Cohen’s D (d) effect sizes, and association factors were also calculated. Results: Superiority of the tango intervention over the waiting list control was found in terms of improvement in fatigue (d = −0.64; 95%CI, −1.2 to −0.08; p = 0.03), especially cognitive fatigue. In addition, a superiority of the tango intervention over the waiting list was found in the improvement of diarrhea (d = −0.69; 95%CI, −1.25 to −0.13; p = 0.02). A pooled pre-post analysis of the 50 participants completing the six-week tango program revealed a close to 10% improvement of fatigue (p = 0.0003), insomnia (p = 0.008) and further quality of life outcomes. Adjusted multivariate linear regression analyses revealed the greatest improvements for participants who were more active in sports. In particular, survivors who received endocrine therapies, were obese, or had no prior dance experience seemed to especially benefit from the tango program. Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a six-week Argentine tango program improves fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Further trials are warranted to determine whether such improvements lead to better long-term clinical outcomes. Trial registration: trial registration number DRKS00021601. Retrospectively registered on 21 August 2020.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women worldwide [1], and approximately one third of these women experience moderate to severe symptoms of fatigue [2,3]. Cancer-related fatigue is a multidimensional syndrome, having a profound negative impact on health-related quality of life (QoL). Fatigue symptoms are most pronounced during cancer treatment and often persist for many years afterwards [3,4,5,6]. In systematic reviews, it has been concluded that benefits for QoL can be reached with physical activity and interventions such as yoga, exercise, physical self-management, and cognitive behavioral therapies [7,8]. Currently, it is widely accepted that exercise and physical activities be proposed as an add-on first-line intervention [9]. A meta-analysis revealed that a supervised combination of resistance training and aerobic training is the most effective physical exercise for reducing fatigue in breast cancer patients [10]. In addition, mindfulness-based interventions, such as meditation and yoga in particular, have been shown to be efficacious to reduce fatigue levels [11]. Another suitable treatment for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients is music therapy; in fact, it has been found to have positive effects on anxiety, fatigue, and QoL [12]. As dance utilizes a combination of physical activity, music, and mindful elements, it might be an appropriate and effective approach to address fatigue symptoms and to improve QoL [13]. Systematic reviews have revealed that different art therapies improve anxiety, depression, fatigue, stress, and QoL, and that cancer-related cognitive complaints especially might be managed through multimodal approaches [14,15,16]. Dance can be understood as a multimodal treatment based on body awareness, expression, and rhythm, combining mindfulness and physical activity [17,18]. However, for breast cancer patients, fatigue and lack of motivation, as well as lack of time, are often barriers to engaging in physical activity [19]. Thus, music-based interventions such as dance might provide motivation for increased physical activity [20]. A dance program conducted in five European countries for patients with breast cancer showed positive changes in QoL and improvements in the emotional and the social scales [21]. Argentine tango is assumed to be suitable for reducing fatigue symptoms, as a systematic review on Argentine tango in Parkinson’s disease reported beneficial effects on fatigue and QoL [22]. To examine the effect of this dance style in cancer patients, a feasibility study on Argentine tango for cancer survivors has been performed [23]. However, a randomized trial is needed to measure the efficacy of tango on fatigue symptoms and further QoL outcomes.
The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a six-week Argentine tango program on fatigue in breast cancer survivors. It was expected that fatigue would improve in the tango group compared to the waiting group. In addition, it was anticipated that the six-week tango program would have additional QoL benefits as well.

2. Materials and Methods

This clinical trial was an investigator-initiated trial approved by the responsible local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Berlin, on 2 April 2020 with the reference number Eth-05/20) and has been registered (trial registration number DRKS00021601). The study protocol was published [24]. All eligible participants provided written informed consent for their participation in the study before enrollment, and the trial was reported in compliance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guidelines.

2.1. Participants, Study Design, and Procedure

The detailed methods of the TANGO trial have been reported and published in the study protocol [24]. Briefly, the TANGO trial was a single-center, 2-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the Research Institute Havelhöhe gGmbH at the Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany. The participants were recruited between June 2020 and May 2022 at the primary care facility of the Breast Cancer Centre at the Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe. To be included in the study, participants had to be diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer 12–48 months before enrollment, had to have completed their primary oncological therapy (e.g., surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy), and had to have had increased fatigue levels as diagnosed with the German version of the Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS-D) [25] (≥12 points in the CFS-D questionnaire). All participants, clinicians, and therapists were blinded to the randomization and assignment process, and eligible participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the tango or the waiting arm. Then, baseline assessments were conducted.

2.2. Intervention

The tango program consisted of six weekly one-hour Argentine tango sessions and was conducted by a professional teacher in small groups of three to eight participants. The tango sessions were conducted in alternating and rotating partner exercises so that all participants learned both the leading and the following roles. The tango exercises were oriented towards walking to music, promoting self-awareness, spatial awareness, and interaction. In brief, the six weekly structured group sessions were comprised of breathing and relaxation exercises, balance finding, tango walking, and dancing elements as well as social interaction. Participants randomized to the waiting arm continued their routine activities during the six-week waiting period and subsequently received the same Argentine tango program as the participants in the tango group.
Adapting to the then prevailing COVID-19 pandemic conditions, the tango sessions were conducted in compliance with the national security and hygienic regulations at that time. The number of sessions each participant actually attended was recorded. The dance program was led by a tango teacher with extensive experience, and the safety of the participants was warranted. The participants were encouraged to report any adverse events, discomfort, or problems they experienced. Post-exertional symptom exacerbation after exercise may occur [26], which was therefore monitored. In cases of severe mobility, balance, or neuro-motoric deficits, precautions similar to those recommended for tango for persons with Parkinson’s disease [27] would have been taken.

2.3. Outcome Measures

Demographic, behavioral, and medical information was collected with the help of clinical interviews, and self-reported fatigue—as well as QoL—was surveyed prior to and after the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the German version of the Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS-D), consisting of a 15-item questionnaire on 3 subscales (physical, cognitive, and affective fatigue) with a possible range of 0 to 60 (maximum fatigue) [25]. The secondary outcomes included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which is composed of seven sleep-related subscales (subjective quality, latency, duration, habitual efficiency, disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime sleepiness) and ranges from 0 to 21 (maximally disturbed sleep) [28]. In addition, the self-reported QoL was investigated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) [29], which is structured into 15 different subscales (1 global health, 5 functional, and 9 symptoms, including fatigue and insomnia scales). We followed the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual for equations, calculation, and the handling of missing data.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and the R software (Version 4.2.1, R core team, Vienna, Austria), a language and environment for statistical computing. One-way ANOVA was performed to determine the between-group mean differences. 95% confidence intervals (CI), Cohen’s D effect sizes (d) (d > 0.2 were considered as small, d > 0.5 as medium, and d > 0.8 as large effect sizes), and significance (p-values < 0.05 are considered to be significant) were calculated. For pre-postanalysis of the entire tango group, adjusted multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify influencing factors and to address potential sources of bias and confounders. Predicting variables (with regard to T0) were age (in years), the respective QoL scale values at T0, the UICC cancer stages (stage I to III; numerical 1–3), the intake of endocrine therapy (no therapy, 0; therapy, 1), participation in sport activities (no sport, 0; occasionally, 1; regularly, 2), possible dance experience (no experience, 0; experience in the past, 1; currently, 2), the menopausal status (pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal), and BMI (normal, 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25; overweight, 25 ≤ BMI < 30, and obese, 30 ≤ BMI).

3. Results

Overall, 272 breast cancer survivors were screened and contacted by the study center; 185 were not suitable because they were not interested (distance too far, no time, pandemic situation) or did not meet all the inclusion criteria. In total, 87 interested candidates were referred to the study physician for a clinical interview, and 60 eligible participants were enrolled and randomized—following the randomization sequence—in the temporal order of the study inclusion and were allocated 1:1 to the tango (n = 30) or the waiting (n = 30) group (Figure 1). Of these 60 enrolled participants, the mean age (SD) was 60.5 (10.3) years and the mean time between first diagnosis and study entry was 1.7 (0.7) years. Two patients dropped out of the tango group (appointment scheduling or medical issue), and two patients dropped out of the waiting group (unwillingness to participate; had no time). The groups were equivalent in terms of baseline characteristics, which are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Group Comparisons

In total, 24 participants in the tango group attended at least four tango sessions and were compared to the 28 participants of the waiting group (Figure 1). For the primary outcome of fatigue, superiority was found for the tango intervention (p = 0.03) over waiting, with a medium effect size for the CFS-D total scale (d = −0.64; 95%CI, −1.2 to −0.08) and especially for the cognitive fatigue subscale (d = −0.62; 95%CI, −1.2 to −0.06) (Table 2).
Boxplot analyses illustrate the between-group differences for the CFS-D total and the cognitive fatigue subscale (Figure 2).
Furthermore, a 15% group difference (p = 0.02) with a medium effect size was found for the improvement of the symptom diarrhea (d = −0.69; 95%CI, −1.25 to −0.13) (Table 2). Additionally, improvements with small effect sizes were observed for further secondary outcomes: the PSQI subscales daytime sleepiness (d = −0.41) and sleep latency (d = −0.25); the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales global health status (d = 0.48), physical (d = 0.48), cognitive (d = 0.33), and social (d = 0.41) functioning scales; and the symptom loss of appetite (d = −0.43) (Table 2).

3.2. Pre-Postanalyses

A total of 50 participants completed the six-week tango program and evaluations of the outcome measures were assessable (Figure 1). Pre-postanalyses for the entire cohort revealed improvements for the CFS-D total and all CFS-D subscales and also for the PSQI total and the PSQI daytime sleepiness subscale (Table 3).
Similarly, improvements for several EORTC QLQ-C30 scales were observed (Table 3) to be especially close to or equal to 10% improvements for fatigue (p = 0.0003), social functioning (p = 0.02), insomnia (p = 0.008), and diarrhea (p = 0.01) (Figure 3).
To identify association factors, linear multivariate regression analyses were performed for all longitudinal changes in QoL questionnaires considering age, body mass index (BMI), cancer stages, respective baseline scale values at T0, endocrine therapy, sport activities, and prior dance experiences. Table 4 presents a summary of multivariate regression analyses for the changes of the CFS-D total and the CFS-D subscales; for the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (QL), physical (PF), emotional (EF), and cognitive (CF) functioning; and for the symptom fatigue (FA). Associations were found between endocrine therapy and the improvement of the CFS-D, in particular the improvement of physical fatigue (estimate β = −7.7; p = 0.03) (Table 4, upper panel). In addition, association of an obese BMI with an improved physical fatigue (estimate β = −12.8; p = 0.04) and similarly an improved emotional functioning (β = 27.7; p = 0.007) were found (Table 4, lower panel). Another finding was the association between enhanced sport activities and improved cognitive functioning (β = 8.4; p = 0.006) and fatigue (β = −5.5; p = 0.04). On the other hand, another association was found between pre-existing dance experience with a lower improvement of fatigue (β = 13.1; p = 0.006) and cognitive functioning (β = −15.5; p = 0.003) (Table 4, lower panel).

3.3. Safety and Dropout

All participants survived the study period, and none developed recurrence or metastases. For the entire study cohort, no mild, moderate, or severe adverse events were recorded. No case of symptom exacerbation was reported in this trial.
A total of 56 participants received the tango program, and 50 of them (89%) completed the tango lessons (Figure 1). In total, 32 participants (64%) attended all six tango sessions, 14 (5%) attended five sessions, and 4 participants (8%) attended four sessions. Six study participants (11%) attended fewer than four sessions and were excluded from the analysis (Figure 1). Reasons for missing single sessions were the pandemic situation or COVID−19 vaccination, illness as well as family, work, or other obligations. None of the participants dropped out of the tango program due to a lack of interest.
In Table 5 the baseline characteristics of the 50 assessable participants with those who participated in fewer than four tango sessions are compared. Most characteristics were equivalent in terms of age, time since first diagnosis, and tumor biology, with the exception of a higher BMI (p = 0.01) and more receipt of chemotherapy (p = 0.05) in dropouts (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The present randomized controlled trial is to our knowledge the first efficacy study to examine an Argentine tango program for reducing fatigue symptoms in breast cancer survivors. Superiority of the tango intervention over waiting was found for the improvement of fatigue. Medium effect sizes were observed for fatigue, especially cognitive fatigue. Furthermore, pre-postanalyses of the entire tango study cohort revealed a 10% improvement in fatigue, insomnia, and other QoL parameters. Moreover, multivariate regression analyses indicated that a higher level of sport activity was associated with an increase in the effectiveness of this tango program. The presence of obesity or the use of endocrine therapies appeared to be associated with an increased effectiveness of this tango program. Furthermore, the positive effect of the tango intervention was increased for those without previous dance experience. It is assumed that the cognitive gain through the learning experience and novelty may be relatively greater for participants who have never danced before, and thus, the effect sizes obtained for QoL improvements are greater.
Compared to the published effects of physical exercise interventions on fatigue, the effect sizes found here are in accordance to the summarized effects in meta-analyses for supervised interventions for cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue [30,31]. Additionally, in an earlier randomized trial of breast cancer patients who had insomnia, six weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy resulted in significant benefits, such as a 13% improvement in sleep efficiency and a 10% improvement in global health status [32]. Interestingly, two recently published RCTs also reported QoL benefits resultant of dance interventions for cancer patients, including the improvement of self-reported fatigue [33,34].
Mind–body therapies and physical activity [35] as well as physical self-management interventions [36] have been established to counteract adverse effects of oncological therapeutics, and seem to generate beneficial effects on perceived QoL including fatigue levels [11,37]. Accordingly, some of these interventions including exercises, yoga, relaxation techniques, stress management, and mediation have been included in international guideline recommendations [38,39], and a recent meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that the supervised combination of resistance training and aerobic training is the most effective physical exercise to reduce fatigue symptoms [10]. The results of our multivariate analyses indicate that improvements in fatigue particularly occur among tango participants who exercise regularly. Thus, the generally known supportive effect of physical activity seems also to synergize with this Argentine tango intervention.
Based on current guideline prescriptions, breast cancer survivors are often advised to undergo adjuvant endocrine therapy to prevent cancer recurrence [40], and accordingly, the majority of the study cohort here were taking these medications. A systematic review with meta-analysis found depression to be a predictor for endocrine therapy refusal, which affects many breast cancer survivors [41]. Reduced self-reported cognitive functioning has been shown to be associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and menopausal complaints [42]. A recent comprehensive review article reported that cognitive dysfunctions are common side effects of endocrine therapy and that there is a benefit in non-pharmacological therapies, specifically with exercise and cognitive rehabilitation [43]. Interestingly, in the present study, multivariate analyses showed that participants taking endocrine therapies in particular benefited from an improvement in fatigue symptoms. Early discontinuation and non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy are associated with increased mortality in breast cancer survivors [44], and cognitive dysfunctions associated with endocrine therapy are underdiagnosed and undertreated [43]. A tango program as described here could therefore be suitable to support endocrine treatment adherence and thereby further clinical outcomes as well.
Increased fatigue levels and cognitive disorders are common among breast cancer survivors, especially if treated with chemotherapy [45]. It was reported that cognitive decline in breast cancer survivors is mainly due to chemotherapy [46,47]. We have also observed that increased cognitive fatigue particularly occurs in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy [48]. There are only few therapeutic options to alleviate cognitive impairments, and it has been reported that Argentine tango can influence and improve cognitive abilities in Parkinson’s disease patients [22]. Argentine tango improves and increases cognitive activity and the participant is constantly learning [27]. Thus, tango may have a positive effect on cognitive fatigue, and thereby on general fatigue symptoms, in breast cancer survivors, as shown in the present trial. It is generally accepted that exercise and physical activity can lower fatigue levels [9]. A music-based, mind–body exercise program such as Argentine tango that is not too elaborate or strenuous and also accommodates the patient’s desire for social interaction [49] might be suitable.
Notably, the most efficacious effects of the tango intervention appeared to be the improvement of diarrhea. Diarrhea is a well-known side effect of many oncological treatments and is experienced by a third of breast cancer patients [50]. Accordingly, fifteen participants (30%) in our study cohort initially self-reported diarrhea (any grade > 1), of whom eleven reported an improvement after the completion of the six-week tango program. That is, Argentine tango could also be helpful in alleviating long-term side effects of oncological therapies, such as diarrhea.
The mechanism by which Argentine tango improves QoL can be explained by the fact that it has a specific effect on improving neurological and psychological functions [22]. In addition, tango improves spatial awareness, which must be stored, remembered, and reused [51]. Thus, in particular, the neurological and cognitive improvements could explain the fact that cognitive fatigue was improved most compared to physical and affective fatigue in our trial. As it requires dancing with a partner, Argentine tango can foster social and personal relationships and support relational goals [22,27]. For our breast cancer survivors, we suggest three additional aspects likely improved their general well-being: (a) the social aspect by fostering teamwork, community involvement, social networking, and non-verbal communication; (b) the low-threshold offer of an interesting, pleasant, and—at the same time—intensive dance therapy; and (c) the self-awareness and embracing of one’s own body, leading to improved self-perception.
Limitations of this study include the use of a waiting but not an additional active waiting group, which precludes the analysis of group effects. An additional limitation is a potential recruitment bias. Furthermore, the recruitment and implementation of the study occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the tango sessions had to be conducted under the locally prescribed hygiene conditions and protective regulations.
The strengths of our trial are the randomized controlled trial design, high adherence to the intervention despite the COVID-19 pandemic situation, and an adjusted multivariate regression analysis—reducing potential confounding biases and identifying positive prognostic variables such as BMI, intake of endocrine therapy, exercise practice, and prior dance experience—which maximizes the generalizability of our findings.

5. Conclusions

The present randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a six-week Argentine tango program improved the fatigue and the quality of life of breast cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue. The results suggest that this program has the potential to improve fatigue in particular in breast cancer survivors taking endocrine therapy, showing obese BMI, and/or with no dance experience. Larger trials are warranted to substantiate the results of this study and to determine whether this tango program is useful for preventing fatigue and improving long-term clinical outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S., T.R., S.B., J.G., S.L.O. and A.T.; data curation, S.L.O. and A.T.; formal analysis, T.R. and S.L.O.; funding acquisition, F.S. and J.G.; investigation, F.S., T.R., S.B., J.G., H.M., S.L.O. and A.T.; methodology, F.S., T.R., S.B., J.G., S.L.O. and A.T.; project administration, F.S., J.G. and H.M.; resources, F.S., T.R., J.G. and H.M.; software, F.S.; supervision, F.S., J.G. and H.M.; validation, S.L.O. and A.T.; visualization, T.R. and S.L.O.; writing—original draft, T.R., S.L.O. and A.T.; Writing—review and editing, F.S., T.R., S.B., J.G., H.M., S.L.O. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported via the institutional budget of the Research Institute Havelhöhe gGmbH at the Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, which is the primary sponsor of the study and received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics of the Medical Association Berlin (Berlin_Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Berlin) on 2 April 2020 with the reference number Eth-05/20. This trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Trial registration number DRKS00021601) on 21 August 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior study enrolment.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets that support the findings in this article are not publicly available for privacy and security reasons but can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all medical documentation officers at the Research Institute Havelhöhe and the Hospital Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe involved in supporting the present work. We also thank all study participants for their time and commitment.

Conflicts of Interest

FS reports grants from Helixor Heilmittel GmbH (travel costs and honoraria for speaking), grants from AstraZeneca (travel costs and honoraria for speaking), grants from Abnoba GmbH, and grants from Iscador AG outside the submitted work. JG reports grants from Roche, Siemens, mte, and Celgene (travel costs and honoraria for speaking) outside the submitted work. HM is a member of the board of directors of Weleda AG, a member of the Network Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF e.V.) guideline committee for integrative oncology (Guideline for Complementary Medicine in the Treatment of Oncological Patients) and has an endowed professorship at the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, which is financed by the Software AG Foundation outside the submitted work. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist. No payment was received for any other aspects of the submitted work. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. There are no other relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bower, J.E.; Ganz, P.A.; Desmond, K.A.; Bernaards, C.; Rowland, J.H.; Meyerowitz, B.E.; Belin, T.R. Fatigue in long-term breast carcinoma survivors: A longitudinal investigation. Cancer 2006, 106, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fabi, A.; Falcicchio, C.; Giannarelli, D.; Maggi, G.; Cognetti, F.; Pugliese, P. The course of cancer related fatigue up to ten years in early breast cancer patients: What impact in clinical practice? Breast 2017, 34, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cella, D.; Peterman, A.; Passik, S.; Jacobsen, P.; Breitbart, W. Progress toward guidelines for the management of fatigue. Oncology 1998, 12, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Bower, J.E. Cancer-related fatigue—Mechanisms, risk factors, and treatments. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 11, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abrahams, H.J.G.; Gielissen, M.F.M.; Schmits, I.C.; Verhagen, C.; Rovers, M.M.; Knoop, H. Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment: A meta-analysis involving 12 327 breast cancer survivors. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lahart, I.M.; Metsios, G.S.; Nevill, A.M.; Carmichael, A.R. Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 1, CD011292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mokhtari-Hessari, P.; Montazeri, A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: Review of reviews from 2008 to 2018. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campbell, K.L.; Winters-Stone, K.M.; Wiskemann, J.; May, A.M.; Schwartz, A.L.; Courneya, K.S.; Zucker, D.S.; Matthews, C.E.; Ligibel, J.A.; Gerber, L.H.; et al. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Torres, D.M.; Koifman, R.J.; Santos, S.D.S. Impact on fatigue of different types of physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Support. Care Cancer Care Cancer 2022, 30, 4651–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Greenlee, H.; DuPont-Reyes, M.J.; Rn, L.G.B.; Carlson, L.E.; Cohen, M.R.; Deng, G.; Johnson, J.A.; Mumber, M.; Seely, D.; Zick, S.M.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 194–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bradt, J.; Dileo, C.; Magill, L.; Teague, A. Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 8, CD006911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sturm, I.; Baak, J.; Storek, B.; Traore, A.; Thuss-Patience, P. Effect of dance on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life. Support. Care Cancer 2014, 22, 2241–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cillessen, L.; Johannsen, M.; Speckens, A.E.; Zachariae, R. Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological and physical health outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psycho-Oncology 2019, 28, 2257–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, H.; Huang, H.; Ji, S.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, F.; Wu, J. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Treat Depression and Anxiety and Improve Quality of Life Among Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1534735419829573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xunlin, N.; Lau, Y.; Klainin-Yobas, P. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 1563–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kaltsatou, A.; Mameletzi, D.; Douka, S. Physical and psychological benefits of a 24-week traditional dance program in breast cancer survivors. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2011, 15, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koch, S.C.; Riege, R.F.F.; Tisborn, K.; Biondo, J.; Martin, L.; Beelmann, A. Effects of Dance Movement Therapy and Dance on Health-Related Psychological Outcomes. A Meta-Analysis Update. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frikkel, J.; Götte, M.; Beckmann, M.; Kasper, S.; Hense, J.; Teufel, M.; Schuler, M.; Tewes, M. Fatigue, barriers to physical activity and predictors for motivation to exercise in advanced Cancer patients. BMC Palliat. Care 2020, 19, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hohmann, L.; Bradt, J.; Stegemann, T.; Koelsch, S. Effects of music therapy and music-based interventions in the treatment of substance use disorders: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karkou, V.; Dudley-Swarbrick, I.; Starkey, J.; Parsons, A.; Aithal, S.; Omylinska-Thurston, J.; Verkooijen, H.M.; Boogaard, R.v.D.; Dochevska, Y.; Djobova, S.; et al. Dancing with Health: Quality of Life and Physical Improvements from an EU Collaborative Dance Programme with Women Following Breast Cancer Treatment. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 635578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lötzke, D.; Ostermann, T.; Büssing, A. Argentine tango in Parkinson disease—A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2015, 15, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Worthen-Chaudhari, L.; Lamantia, M.; Monfort, S.; Mysiw, W.; Chaudhari, A.; Lustberg, M. Partnered, adapted argentine tango dance for cancer survivors: A feasibility study and pilot study of efficacy. Clin. Biomech. 2019, 70, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oei, S.L.; Rieser, T.; Becker, S.; Groß, J.; Matthes, H.; Schad, F.; Thronicke, A. TANGO: Effect of tango Argentino on cancer-associated fatigue in breast cancer patients—Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021, 22, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kröz, M.; Zerm, R.; Reif, M.; VON Laue, H.; Schad, F.; Büssing, A.; Bartsch, C.; Feder, G.; Girke, M. Validation of the German version of the Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS-D). Eur. J. Cancer Care 2008, 17, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Twomey, R.; Yeung, S.T.; Wrightson, J.G.; Millet, G.Y.; Culos-Reed, S.N. Post-exertional Malaise in People with Chronic Cancer-Related Fatigue. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2020, 60, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hackney, M.E.; Earhart, G.M. Recommendations for Implementing Tango Classes for Persons with Parkinson Disease. Am. J. Dance Ther. 2010, 32, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F., III; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aaronson, N.K.; Ahmedzai, S.; Bergman, B.; Bullinger, M.; Cull, A.; Duez, N.J.; Filiberti, A.; Flechtner, H.; Fleishman, S.B.; De Haes, J.C.J.M.; et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Twomey, R.; Yeung, S.; Wrightson, J.G.; Sung, L.; Robinson, P.D.; Millet, G.Y.; Culos-Reed, S.N. Physical Activity in Adults With Fatigue After Cancer Treatment. Commun. Kinesiol. 2021, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Vulpen, J.K.; Sweegers, M.G.; Peeters, P.H.M.; Courneya, K.S.; Newton, R.U.; Aaronson, N.K.; Jacobsen, P.B.; Galvão, D.A.; Chinapaw, M.J.; Steindorf, K.; et al. Moderators of Exercise Effects on Cancer-related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2020, 52, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Savard, J.; Simard, S.; Ivers, H.; Morin, C.M. Randomized Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Secondary to Breast Cancer, Part I: Sleep and Psychological Effects. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 6083–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Boing, L.; Fretta, T.D.B.; Lynch, B.M.; Dias, M.; da Rosa, L.M.; Baptista, F.; Bergmann, A.; Fausto, D.Y.; Martins, J.B.B.; Guimarães, A.C.D.A. Mat Pilates and belly dance: Effects on patient-reported outcomes among breast cancer survivors receiving hormone therapy and adherence to exercise. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pr. 2023, 50, 101683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cruz, E.I.d.S.; Cruz, A.H.D.S.; Ventura, J.A.; Marques, R.A.S.; Santos, R.D.S.; Reis, A.A.D.S. The impact of dance as a non-pharmacological adjuvant therapy cancer survivors: A clinical trial. Res. Soc. Dev. 2022, 11, e14411729714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peterson, L.L.; Ligibel, J.A. Physical Activity and Breast Cancer: An Opportunity to Improve Outcomes. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Van Dijck, S.; Nelissen, P.; Verbelen, H.; Tjalma, W.; Gebruers, N. The effects of physical self-management on quality of life in breast cancer patients: A systematic review. Breast 2016, 28, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lipsett, A.; Barrett, S.; Haruna, F.; Mustian, K.; O’Donovan, A. The impact of exercise during adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer on fatigue and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2017, 32, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fabi, A.; Bhargava, R.; Fatigoni, S.; Guglielmo, M.; Horneber, M.; Roila, F.; Weis, J.; Jordan, K.; Ripamonti, C. Cancer-related fatigue: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lyman, G.H.; Greenlee, H.; Bohlke, K.; Bao, T.; DeMichele, A.M.; Deng, G.E.; Fouladbakhsh, J.M.; Gil, B.; Hershman, D.L.; Mansfield, S.; et al. Integrative Therapies During and After Breast Cancer Treatment: ASCO Endorsement of the SIO Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2647–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Davies, C.; Pan, H.; Godwin, J.; Gray, R.; Arriagada, R.; Raina, V.; Abraham, M.; Medeiros Alencar, V.H.; Badran, A.; Bonfill, X.; et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mausbach, B.T.; Schwab, R.B.; Irwin, S.A. Depression as a predictor of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 152, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schilder, C.M.T.; Seynaeve, C.; Linn, S.C.; Boogerd, W.; Beex, L.V.A.M.; Gundy, C.M.; Nortier, J.W.R.; Van De Velde, C.J.H.; Van Dam, F.S.A.M.; Schagen, S.B. Self-reported cognitive functioning in postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during endocrine treatment: Findings from the neuropsychological TEAM side-study. Psycho-Oncology 2012, 21, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Haggstrom, L.R.; Vardy, J.L.; Carson, E.-K.; Segara, D.; Lim, E.; Kiely, B.E. Effects of Endocrine Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers 2022, 14, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hershman, D.L.; Shao, T.; Kushi, L.H.; Buono, D.; Tsai, W.Y.; Fehrenbacher, L.; Kwan, M.; Gomez, S.L.; Neugut, A.I. Early discontinuation and non-adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy are associated with increased mortality in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 126, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Joly, F.; Lange, M.; Dos Santos, M.; Vaz-Luis, I.; Di Meglio, A. Long-Term Fatigue and Cognitive Disorders in Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancers 2019, 11, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oberste, M.; Schaffrath, N.; Schmidt, K.; Bloch, W.; Jäger, E.; Steindorf, K.; Hartig, P.; Joisten, N.; Zimmer, P. Protocol for the “Chemobrain in Motion—Study” (CIM—Study): A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the impact of a high-intensity interval endurance training on cancer related cognitive impairments in women with breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lange, M.; Joly, F.; Vardy, J.; Ahles, T.; Dubois, M.; Tron, L.; Winocur, G.; De Ruiter, M.; Castel, H. Cancer-related cognitive impairment: An update on state of the art, detection, and management strategies in cancer survivors. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1925–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oei, S.L.; Thronicke, A.; Kröz, M.; von Trott, P.; Schad, F.; Matthes, H. Impact of Oncological Therapy and Viscum album L Treatment on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Internal Coherence in Nonmetastasized Breast Cancer Patients. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 1534735420917211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Witkoś, J.; Hartman-Petrycka, M. Implications of Argentine Tango for Health Promotion, Physical Well-Being as Well as Emotional, Personal and Social Life on a Group of Women Who Dance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sodergren, S.C.; Copson, E.; White, A.; Efficace, F.; Sprangers, M.; Fitzsimmons, D.; Bottomley, A.; Johnson, C.D. Systematic Review of the Side Effects Associated with Anti-HER2-Targeted Therapies Used in the Treatment of Breast Cancer, on Behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. Target. Oncol. 2016, 11, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McKee, K.E.; Hackney, M.E. The Effects of Adapted Tango on Spatial Cognition and Disease Severity in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Mot. Behav. 2013, 45, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 15 02920 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study phases.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study phases.
Cancers 15 02920 g001
Cancers 15 02920 g002 550
Figure 2. Between-group differences in CFS-D scores tango versus waiting. Boxplots for the between-group differences of the CFS-D scores for six-weeks waiting or tango are shown. Significant differences are indicated. *: p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2. Between-group differences in CFS-D scores tango versus waiting. Boxplots for the between-group differences of the CFS-D scores for six-weeks waiting or tango are shown. Significant differences are indicated. *: p-value < 0.05.
Cancers 15 02920 g002
Cancers 15 02920 g003 550
Figure 3. Pre-post analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores for the six-week tango program. For the entire study cohort, n = 50, boxplots for longitudinal changes for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores pre-post tango are shown. Significant effects are indicated. *: p-value < 0.05, **: p-value < 0.005.
Figure 3. Pre-post analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores for the six-week tango program. For the entire study cohort, n = 50, boxplots for longitudinal changes for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores pre-post tango are shown. Significant effects are indicated. *: p-value < 0.05, **: p-value < 0.005.
Cancers 15 02920 g003
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
TotalWaitingTangop-Value
Number of patients, n (%)60 (100)30 (100)30 (100)
Age, years, mean (SD)60.5 (10.3)59.3 (11.0)61.7 (9.4)0.377
Body mass index (BMI)
Normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25)39 (65)21 (70)18 (60)
Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30)13 (22)6 (20)7 (23)0.668
Obese (BMI ≥ 30)8 (13)3 (10)5 (17)
Currently employed, n (%)23 (38)12 (40)11 (37)1
Living in partnership, n (%)39 (65)19 (63)20 (67)1
Years since first diagnosis: mean (SD)1.7 (0.7)1.7 (0.7)1.6 (0.6)0.614
UICC stages, n (%)
I28 (47)12 (40)16 (53)
II23 (38)14 (47)9 (30)0.413
III9 (15)4 (13)5 (17)
Hormonal status, n (%)
Premenopausal3 (5)3 (10)0
Postmenopausal57 (95)27 (90)30 (100)0.236
Triple-negative status, n (%)6 (10)2 (7)4 (13)0.667
Oncological Interventions, n (%)
Surgery60 (100)30 (100)30 (100)1
Radiation52 (87)25 (83)27 (90)0.704
Endocrine therapy39 (65)21 (70)18 (60)0.588
Chemotherapy31 (52)16 (53)15 (50)1
Immunotherapy6 (10)3 (10)3 (10)1
Sportive activities, n (%)
No9 (15)5 (17)4 (13)
Occasionally13 (22)4 (13)9 (30)0.293
Regularly38 (64)21 (70)17 (57)
Dance experience, n (%)
No19 (32)12 (40)7 (23)
Yes, in the past38 (63)16 (53)22 (73)0.273
Yes, current3 (5)2 (7)1 (3)
CFS-D
Total fatigue score, mean (SD)32.2 (9.0)33.7 (7.6)30.6 (10.0)0.195
Physical fatigue, mean (SD)14.1 (4.1)14.9 (3.8)13.3 (4.2)0.109
Affective fatigue, mean (SD)6.9 (2.6)7.3 (2.2)6.4 (2.8)0.196
Cognitive fatigue, mean (SD)11.2 (3.5)11.4 (3.0)10.9 (4.0)0.605
CFS-D: Cancer fatigue scale, German version; n: numbers; SD: standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Group differences, six weeks tango versus waiting.
Table 2. Group differences, six weeks tango versus waiting.
Tango, n = 24Waiting, n = 28Tango vs. Waiting
dmean (SD) p-Valuedmean (SD) p-Valuep-Value d [95% CI]
CFS-D-total−4.4 (5.4)0.001 *−1.3 (4.4) 0.140.03 *−0.64 [−1.2; −0.08]
Physical fatigue−1.9 (2.5)0.002 *−0.78 (2.6) 0.140.13−0.43 [−1.0; 0.12]
Affective fatigue−1.0 (2.4)0.052−0.3 (1.3) 0.320.15−0.42 [−1.0; 0.14]
Cognitive fatigue−1.5 (2.2)0.004 *−0.3 (1.8) 0.440.03 *−0.62 [−1.2; −0.06]
PSQI-total−0.8 (2.5)0.16−0.8 (2.3) 0.080.960.02 [−0.54; 0.57]
Sleep latency−0.3 (0.8)0.04 *−0.1 (0.8) 0.360.39−0.25 [−0.79; 0.30]
Daytime sleepiness−0.3 (0.5)0.03 *−0.04 (0.6) 0.750.16 −0.41 [−0.97; 0.15]
EORTC QLQ C30
Global health4.7 (16.2)0.18−1.9 (11.0) 0.400.100.48 [−0.08; 1.03]
Physical functioning3.3 (12.3)0.21−4.1 (17.8) 0.250.090.48 [−0.08; 1.03]
Cognitive functioning6.9 (17.3)0.070.6 (20.7)0.880.250.33 [−0.22; 0.88]
Social functioning14.9 (27.0)0.01 *3.6 (28.3)0.520.160.41 [−0.14; 0.96]
Appetite loss0.0 (16.7)18.3 (21.1)0.05 *0.13−0.43 [−0.98; −0.12]
Diarrhea−8.3 (19.8)0.067.1 (24.2)0.140.02 *−0.69 [−1.25; −0.13]
CFS-D: Cancer fatigue scale, German version; EORTC QLQ C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire C30; CI: confidence interval; dmean: mean difference; d: Cohen’s D; n: numbers; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SD: standard deviation. Significant p-values are indicated: *: p-value < 0.05. Small or medium d effect sizes are indicated in bold.
Table
Table 3. Pre-postanalyses for six-week tango.
Table 3. Pre-postanalyses for six-week tango.
n = 50dmeanSDp-Value
CFS-D-total−3.65.80.01 *
Physical fatigue−1.62.80.02 *
Affective fatigue−1.02.30.06 *
Cognitive fatigue−1.12.30.002 *
PSQI-total−0.92.70.03 *
Daytime sleepiness−0.20.60.02 *
EORTC QLQ-C30
Global health status5.715.60.02 *
Physical functioning6.914.30.001 *
Role functioning8.225.90.03 *
Cognitive functioning6.319.70.03 *
Social functioning9.227.60.02 *
Fatigue−9.817.50.0003 *
Insomnia−10.225.60.008 *
Diarrhea−8.723.90.01 *
CFS-D: Cancer fatigue scale, German version; dmean: mean difference; n: numbers; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; EORTC QLQ C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire C30; SD: standard deviation. Significant p-values are indicated: *: p-value < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Association factors for six-week tango and CFS-D and EORTC QLQ C30 changes.
Table 4. Association factors for six-week tango and CFS-D and EORTC QLQ C30 changes.
CFS-D, n = 50TotalPhysical FatigueCognitive FatigueAffective Fatigue
Adjusted forage, cancer stage, T0-value, and menopausal status
Endocrine therapy−6.825 *−7.725 *−6.513−7.119 +
Reference BMI normal
BMI overweight2.3500.9003.1595.239
BMI obese−7.391−12.882 *−5.695−6.478
Sports−3.711 *−4.732 *−3.760 +−3.234
Dance experience6.781 *6.890 *6.390+6.930+
EORTC QLQ C30, n = 50QLPFEFCFFA
Adjusted forage, cancer stage, T0-value, and menopausal status
Endocrine therapy−2.847−1.8943.2423.315−2.367
Reference BMI normal
BMI overweight−0.9400.6245.3188.7035.516
BMI obese3.10612.775 +27.671 **14.755−6.873
Sports4.353 +0.9413.6098.44 0 **−5.485 *
Dance experience−5.0711.091−9.575+−15.511 **13.107 **
Multivariate linear regression analyses, adjusted for age, UICC cancer stages, the respective CFS-D or EORTC QLQ-C30-values at T0, and menopausal status were performed for CFS-D (upper panel) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (lower panel) scale changes for the six-week tango module. The estimates of the CFS-D scale and subscales were converted to percentages. Improvements of functional EORTC QLQ-C30 scales are indicated by positive whereas improvement of fatigue by negative estimates. Significant p-values are indicated: **: p-value < 0.005; *: p-value < 0.05; +: p-value < 0.01. Significant improvements are highlighted in green and deteriorations in red. Nonsignificant improvements with estimates > 5 are highlighted in light green and deteriorations in orange. CFS-D: Cancer fatigue scale, German version; EORTC QLQ C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire C30; n: numbers; QL: global health status; PF: physical; EF: emotional; CF: cognitive; FA: fatigue symptoms.
Table
Table 5. Characteristics of participants.
Table 5. Characteristics of participants.
n = 56Completed Tango
(89%)		Discontinued Tango
(11%)		p-Value
Number of patients, n (%)50 (100)6 (100)
Age, years, mean (SD)61.3 (9.9)60.5 (12.2)0.855
Body mass index (BMI)
Normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25)36 (72)2 (33)
Overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30)10 (20)1 (17)0.012 *
Obese (BMI ≥ 30)4 (8)3 (50)
Living in partnership, n (%)31 (62)5 (83)0.562
Years since first diagnosis: mean (SD)1.7 (0.7)1.4 (0.1)0.328
UICC stages, n (%)
I23 (46)2 (33)
II20 (40)2 (33)0.473
III7 (14)2 (33)
Hormonal status, n (%)
Premenopausal2 (4)0
Postmenopausal48 (96)6 (100)1
Triple-negative status, n (%)4 (8)2 (33)0.231
Interventions, n (%)
Surgery50 (100)6 (100)1
Radiation46 (92)5 (83)1
Endocrine therapy34 (68)4 (67)1
Chemotherapy24 (48)6 (100)0.048 *
Immunotherapy6 (12)00.841
Sport activities, n (%)
No8 (16)1 (17)
Occasionally11 (22)1 (17)0.955
Regularly31 (62)4 (67)
Dance experience, n (%)
No16 (32)1 (17)
Yes, in the past32 (64)4 (67)0.363
Yes, current2 (4)1 (17)
QoL assessment at baseline
CFS-D total, mean (SD)31.01 (9.26)37.00 (5.23)0.133
PSQI total, mean (SD)9.55 (3.43)11.50 (4.99)0.229
EORTC QLQ C30 Global health,
mean (SD)		54.42 (16.84)51.67 (20.00)0.739
CFS-D: Cancer fatigue scale, German version; n: numbers; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; EORTC QLQ C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire C30; SD: standard deviation. Significant p-values are indicated: *: p-value < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schad, F.; Rieser, T.; Becker, S.; Groß, J.; Matthes, H.; Oei, S.L.; Thronicke, A. Efficacy of Tango Argentino for Cancer-Associated Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers 2023, 15, 2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112920

AMA Style

Schad F, Rieser T, Becker S, Groß J, Matthes H, Oei SL, Thronicke A. Efficacy of Tango Argentino for Cancer-Associated Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers. 2023; 15(11):2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schad, Friedemann, Thomas Rieser, Sarah Becker, Jessica Groß, Harald Matthes, Shiao Li Oei, and Anja Thronicke. 2023. "Efficacy of Tango Argentino for Cancer-Associated Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial" Cancers 15, no. 11: 2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112920

APA Style

Schad, F., Rieser, T., Becker, S., Groß, J., Matthes, H., Oei, S. L., & Thronicke, A. (2023). Efficacy of Tango Argentino for Cancer-Associated Fatigue and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers, 15(11), 2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15112920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop