Next Article in Journal
Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
The Phosphorylation of Kv1.3: A Modulatory Mechanism for a Multifunctional Ion Channel
Previous Article in Journal
Eosin Y-Functionalized Upconverting Nanoparticles: Nanophotosensitizers and Deep Tissue Bioimaging Agents for Simultaneous Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

CRAC and SK Channels: Their Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Cancer Cell Development

Institute of Biophysics, JKU Life Science Center, Johannes Kepler University Linz, A-4020 Linz, Austria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010101
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Channel Proteins in Cancer)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cell fate is ultimately determined by the precisely coordinated action of the Ca2+-signaling machinery. During carcinogenesis, Ca2+ signaling is significantly remodeled due to mutations and/or ectopic expression. Here, we summarize current knowledge on how alterations in Ca2+ signaling contribute to the development of different cancer hallmarks. Emphasis is placed on the structure/function relationship of the well-studied store-operated Ca2+ channel, i.e., Orai1, and the Ca2+-activated K+ channel, i.e., SK3, alongside their individual and joint roles in cancer. This review lays out the current state of knowledge of Ca2+-signaling effectors and proteins as potential targets for the treatment of certain cancer types, with Orai1 and SK3 presented as emerging therapeutic targets.

Abstract

Cancer represents a major health burden worldwide. Several molecular targets have been discovered alongside treatments with positive clinical outcomes. However, the reoccurrence of cancer due to therapy resistance remains the primary cause of mortality. Endeavors in pinpointing new markers as molecular targets in cancer therapy are highly desired. The significance of the co-regulation of Ca2+-permeating and Ca2+-regulated ion channels in cancer cell development, proliferation, and migration make them promising molecular targets in cancer therapy. In particular, the co-regulation of the Orai1 and SK3 channels has been well-studied in breast and colon cancer cells, where it finally leads to an invasion-metastasis cascade. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered, such as which key molecular components determine and regulate their interplay. To provide a solid foundation for a better understanding of this ion channel co-regulation in cancer, we first shed light on the physiological role of Ca2+ and how this ion is linked to carcinogenesis. Then, we highlight the structure/function relationship of Orai1 and SK3, both individually and in concert, their role in the development of different types of cancer, and aspects that are not yet known in this context.

1. Introduction

Every year, 18.1 million cases of cancer are diagnosed worldwide, of which 9.5 million lead to death. These numbers are expected to rise 1.6-fold by 2040 [1]. The reasons for enhanced cancer-related deaths originate from the complexity of this disease. Generally, human cells grow and divide to form new cells, while the old cells die and are replaced by new ones. Sometimes, however, abnormal or damaged cells continue to grow and proliferate when they should not. The latter can lead to the formation of non-cancerous (benign) or cancerous tumors. Benign tumors can be removed and usually do not grow back, whereas cancerous tumors spread or invade nearby tissues and migrate to other sites in the human body to form new tumors, which is known as metastasis. Despite the complexity of the disease, cancer development can be described by a list of cancer hallmarks defined by Hanahan and Weinberg [2]. The most general hallmarks are sustained proliferation, apoptosis resistance, evading growth suppressors, angiogenesis induction, replicative immortality, tissue invasion, and metastasis [2,3,4,5,6,7]. One essential factor that contributes to cancer progression is calcium (Ca2+). In this review, we first describe the general role of Ca2+ in tumor development. Since the co-regulation of the Ca2+ channel: Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel, and the Ca2+-regulated channel: Ca2+-activated K+ channel, or SK3, have been extensively reported to play a role in certain cancer types in the last century, we delineate here the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of both channels individually and in co-regulation. We highlight critical factors that determine their structure/function relationship, their roles in carcinogenesis identified to date, and outstanding questions in this context.

1.1. Physiological Role of Ca2+

Ca2+ ions are versatile intracellular signals that regulate a plethora of cellular processes including gene transcription, proliferation, and cell migration [8,9]. They act as second messengers linking external or intraluminal signals (endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria) and lead to intracellular responses through a variety of distinct cascades. Under physiological conditions, the Ca2+ concentration on the extracellular side and in intracellular organelles is in the range of mM, and it is 10,000-fold lower in the cytosol [10,11,12,13]. This Ca2+ gradient defines the versatility of this signal ion in the life cycle of a cell, to initiate and drive processes such as immune cell activity, neurotransmitter release, or muscle contraction [8,9,14]. Activation of the cell can lead to elevations in intracellular Ca2+ levels that occur either through Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (ER, mitochondria) or Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane (PM) from the extracellular space [15].
Cellular Ca2+ signaling is orchestrated by Ca2+-transporting and Ca2+-sensing proteins. Ca2+ level enhancements can be initiated by the stimulation of a membrane receptor (e.g., G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)), membrane depolarization (voltage-dependent channels [16]), or mechanical stress (mechanosensitive Ca2+ channels [17]). Ca2+ signaling mediated by membrane receptor stimulation triggers the development of cellular factors (e.g., inositol-tri-phosphate (IP3), diacylglycerol (DAG)) that activate Ca2+ ion channels in intracellular compartments (e.g., IP3R in ER membrane) and/or the plasma membrane (e.g., receptor- or store-operated channels) to allow Ca2+ flux into the cytosol. Cytosolic Ca2+ elevations are sensed by a number of proteins such as Calmodulin (CaM) and downstream targets including CaM kinase (CaMK), calcineurin (CN), or protein kinase C (PKC) (Figure 1A), which drive various downstream processes, including gene transcription, proliferation, cell death, migration, and metabolism [14]. Ca2+ signaling events are terminated by Ca2+ transporters that pump Ca2+ back into cellular organelles (e.g., SERCA) or to the extracellular side (PMCA) [18].

1.2. Ca2+ Signal Transduction in Major Cancer Hallmarks

In cancer cells, genetic and epigenetic alterations can lead to the remodeling of Ca2+-signaling components, disrupting the healthy Ca2+ balance [3,6,19,20]. This allows cells to bypass mechanisms controlling inappropriate proliferation and prevent the survival of ectopically proliferating cells outside their normal niches [21]. Ca2+ acts at different stages of cancer signaling cascades either directly via Ca2+ signaling proteins (CaM, CaMK, CN) or indirectly via transcription factors (e.g., NFAT) or oncogenic routes. The two major oncogenic pathways [22] that have a central role in the development of the different cancer hallmarks are the rat sarcoma virus—extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (Ras-ERK)—and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt (Akt, also known as protein kinase B, PKB) pathways. They are activated upon ligand binding to integrin adhesion receptors and signaling by cytokines, hormones, or exogenous growth factors [23]. Within the Ras-ERK pathway, stimulation of the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK; e.g., epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)) activates the small GTPase, Ras, followed by the serine/threonine kinase (Raf), and finally the extracellular signal-regulated kinase, ERK [21]. In the PI3K-Akt pathway, receptor stimulation triggers the activation of the lipid kinase (PI3K), which in consequence activates the serine/threonine kinase Akt. Both ERK and Akt phosphorylate various downstream effectors, including transcription factors and kinases [24]. (Figure 1A,B). Ca2+ and these oncogenic pathways can affect each other in a bidirectional manner to promote cancer progression. On the one hand, distinct Ca2+ signals can tune oncogene-dependent signaling [18,25]. For example, the activation status of the Ras oncogene is altered by an interplay of Ca2+ ions with Ras regulatory factors, such as CaM [25,26]. On the other hand, oncogene-regulated routes can reshape Ca2+ signals, as evidenced by the fact that the oncogene Ras interacts with and activates PLCε to produce IP3, which triggers ER-Ca2+ store-depletion [23] (Figure 1). Overall, direct and indirect modulation of cancer signaling pathways promotes cancer cell proliferation, survival, and migration, as described in detail in the following subsections.

1.3. Ca2+-Dependent Dysregulation of Proliferation

The multitude of Ca2+-dependent effectors modulating proliferation is selectively and efficiently controlled by specific spatiotemporal Ca2+ signaling. The abovementioned ways of Ca2+-dependent regulation of cancer signaling pathways control proliferation at the level of the cell cycle machinery. Particularly, Ca2+ signaling at the onset of the G1 phase leads to the activation and expression of transcription factors of Nuclear Factor Activated T cells (NFAT), cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB), and AP1 (FOS, JUN) families [25]. These components coordinate the expression of cell cycle regulators, notably certain types of cyclin proteins (Cyclin D/E) and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK2/4/6). Ca2+ also drives their complex formation (CDK4/6-Cyclin D, CDK2-Cyclin E) at the end of G1 to finally ensure the transition to the S phase. The progression of the G1 phase is further fine-tuned by CDK inhibitor proteins (p21, p27), whose action is controlled directly by Ca2+ via Ca2+-sensing proteins, CaM, CaMKII, and calcineurin (CN) and the tumor suppressor p53 [25]. Ca2+ is also essential for subsequent cell cycle phase transitions (G1/S, G2/M) and associated rearrangements of centrosomes are triggered by Ca2+ oscillations acting in concert with CaM and CaMKII [18,27] (Figure 1A).
Further upstream, Ca2+ impacts the cell cycles via Ras-ERK or PI3K-Akt cascades. For instance, Ca2+ induces ERK phosphorylation via the CaM-CaMKII pathway to regulate proliferation [28]. This occurs via ERK-mediated phosphorylation of various transcription factors essential for proliferation, most notably Myc. Myc triggers the expression of a number of proteins (e.g., cyclins, CDKs) that interfere with the cell cycle [27]. In addition, Ca2+ might also intervene in the complex action of Akt, which governs proliferation during cell cycle progression, by promoting protein synthesis essential for cell growth, suppressing cell cycle inhibitors through their sequestration or impaired gene transcription, and controlling a set of enzymes involved in the G2/M transition [29] (Figure 1A).
A variety of other cancer signaling pathways (e.g., Wnt/ß-catenin, Wnt/Ca2+) target Myc to modulate cell cycle progression [21,30], among which the Wnt/Ca2+ route can control Ca2+ signaling. The Wnt-Ca2+ pathway is initialized by Frizzled receptors, which initiate a classical G-protein-coupled signaling cascade that results in the production of IP3 and DAG and is thus directly linked to Ca2+ signaling pathways [30,31].

1.4. Ca2+-Dependent Dysregulation of Cell Survival and Cell Death

Cancer cells harness the Ca2+ signaling machinery to ensure their survival and protect themselves from apoptosis. Ca2+ is involved in the activation of pro-survival signaling pathways and anti-apoptotic proteins that inhibit or neutralize death signals [25]. In this context, the ER and mitochondria are the major locations to determine cell fate. Although elevations in cytosolic Ca2+ due to ER store depletion are essential for many vital processes, they can also trigger apoptosis. For example, cytosolic death effectors such as calpain are stimulated, rendering the cell susceptible to apoptosis through the activation of caspases [32]. Moreover, Ca2+-flux between the ER and mitochondria can stimulate death-inducing signals [18,25]. Several tumor suppressors, such as p53, are enriched at the ER. There, p53 interacts with SERCA pumps, increases the ER’s Ca2+ load, and contributes to Ca2+ crosstalk between the ER and mitochondria. This enables the efficient release of pro-apoptotic factors [33,34,35,36,37]. p53 and Ca2+ ions act as interdependent cellular signals, although the detailed cellular pathways are unknown [38] (Figure 1B). A recent study [39] has shown that the protein kinase CK2 plays a critical role in maintaining elevated cytosolic Ca2+ levels that promote prostate cancer progression. CK2 inhibition reduced cytosolic Ca2+ and increased Ca2+ levels in the ER and mitochondria to induce apoptosis [39], whereas the underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified.
Whether apoptosis occurs is further defined by a complex interplay of pro- (e.g., Bim—BCL2—interacting mediator of cell death, BID-BH3-interacting domain death agonist, Bad—BCL2-associated agonist of cell death) and anti-apoptotic (e.g., BCL2, BCLxL) factors at the mitochondria [25,32]. Dysregulation of Ca2+ signaling routes, either directly via Ca2+ sensing proteins or indirectly via oncogenic signaling pathways, can lead to an imbalance between pro- and anti-apoptotic regulators in favor of anti-apoptotic proteins [11,18,25,32,40,41,42,43] (Figure 1B). Most cancer cells display enhanced expression levels of apoptosis-regulating proteins of the BCL2 family. They are responsible for reducing the amount of Ca2+ in the ER or preventing Ca2+ uptake into mitochondria, which can lead to apoptosis resistance. Apoptosis can be also reduced by the interplay of Akt with IP3R, leading to decreased Ca2+ release from the ER [18,25] (Figure 1B).

1.5. Ca2+-Dependent Dysregulation of Migration and Invasion

Cancer metastasis involves epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and intravasation, all of which are controlled by Ca2+ [18,25]. EMT is a gradual, transient process (already important in embryonic development) in which cell–cell connections degrade and detach from the basement membrane, causing cells to lose polarity [44]. In several cancer cell types, it is associated with the downregulation of common epithelial genes (cytokeratins, E-cadherin) and the upregulation of mesenchymal markers (vimentin, fibronectin, N-cadherin, and metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 (MACC-1)) [42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53] (Figure 1C, Top). This switch in markers during EMT is linked to aberrant Ca2+ signaling in many cancer types [19,32]. For instance, CaMKII activates vimentin via phosphorylation [54]. Furthermore, abnormal Ca2+ levels develop due to the GPCR signaling and cancer-specific upregulation of certain types of Ca2+ ion channels. Consequently, elevated Ca2+ levels activate the transcriptional machinery, vital for the upregulation of certain genes such as Snail, Twist, Zeb, and N-cadherin. These genes participate in numerous transitions, including cell polarity, cytoskeletal remodeling, migration, and invasion [40,42,51,54,55]. Moreover, genes activated after signal transduction through the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway govern cell migration by targeting ß-catenin [30] (Figure 1C).
Directional movement of migratory cells is usually driven by highly localized Ca2+ signals reaching a rear-to-front Ca2+ gradient. Rear-end retraction of the migratory cell is driven by Ca2+-modulated myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), followed by actomyosin contraction and disassembly of focal adhesions. The latter is governed by the Ca2+-sensitive protease calpain, which cleaves focal adhesion kinase (FAK), vinculin, talin, and integrins to disconnect the membrane from the cytoskeleton. Conversely, directed actin polymerization and growing focal adhesions located at the leading edge of migrating cells to form membrane extension are stimulated by spatially confined Ca2+ signals. This is modulated by small GTPase, such as Ras and Rac1, Ca2+-dependent factors, including CaMK and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2), and FAK [32] (Figure 1C). Altered Ca2+ levels in tumor cells can further promote FAK disassembly and contribute to the reduction of cell adhesions that promote cell migration. Moreover, the formation of membrane extensions (invadopodia) is driven by the expression of Ca2+-dependent pro-invasive enzymes (e.g., matrix metalloproteins (MMPs)) that contribute to the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [18,32,40] (Figure 1C).

1.6. Ca2+-Dependent Dysregulation of Other Cancer Hallmarks

Another phenomenon that occurs in most malignant tumors is non-physiological oxygen levels, known as hypoxia. Cell adaptation to hypoxia is primarily regulated by overexpression of the transcription factor HIF-1, which leads to angiogenesis, cell proliferation/survival, and invasion/metastasis [56,57,58]. Hypoxia can increase transcription and expression of Ca2+ channels and is therefore frequently connected to cytosolic Ca2+ enhancements, which can promote the transcription of target genes responsible for the development of various cancer hallmarks [59]. Indeed, chemical treatments leading to hypoxia of different cancer cell lines increased intracellular Ca2+ as well as the expression of certain Ca2+ ion channels [60,61]. Moreover, silencing of the HIF-1 transcription factor in breast cancer reduced the expression of critical Ca2+ ion channels [62]. Notch is a cellular pathway associated with HIF-1 signaling. Knock-down or pharmacological inhibition of Notch-1 decreased the expression of certain Ca2+ ion channels in breast, colon, and glioma cancer cells [63,64]. Conversely, Ca2+ fluxes from the ER and outside of the cell can control HIF-1 signaling [24,59] (Figure 2). However, the underlying mechanisms of these effects are only starting to be understood. Overall, hypoxia is responsible for the development of different cancer hallmarks, alters cancer cell metabolism, and contributes to therapy resistance [56].

2. Ca2+ Ion Channels and Their Role in Cancer

Intracellular Ca2+ is integral in the pathogenesis of key cancer features, as described in the previous subsection. Considering that many current anticancer drugs are largely ineffective in many cancers, emerging scientific discoveries indicate that the pool of Ca2+-permeable and -dependent ion channels are a rich supply of new potential therapeutic targets. Already in the late 1980s, a distinct pattern of functional expression of ion channels in cancer cells was detected, providing a possible link between ion channels and carcinogenesis [65,66,67,68,69,70]. Disrupted expression and/or dysfunction of ion channels can deregulate cellular processes that develop into cancer hallmarks [2,4,5,6,7].
Among the diversity of ion channels, PM ion channels have a significant role in the development of various cancer phenotypes and can be categorized as voltage-gated (VGCC) and non-voltage Ca2+ ion channels [32,40]. Despite their main role in ‘‘excitable cells’’, VGCC are proposed to govern some common molecular mechanisms of carcinogenic events due to their overexpression in many cancers [71,72]. Non-voltage-gated channels can be subdivided into ligand-gated channels (LGC, e.g., purine ionotropic P2X receptor families) [73], receptor- or second messenger-operated channels (ROC or SMOC, e.g., some transient receptor potential (TRP) channel members and the Orai family) [74,75], SOC (some TRP channel members and the Orai family) [74,76], acid-sensing channels (ASIC) [77], and mechanically gated channels [78]. A number of studies reported their altered expression and/or function in different tumor cells, driving the development of cancer hallmarks [53,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89]. Particularly, TRP channels perform versatile functions in tumorigenesis, in addition to their multiple roles in the healthy body [90,91,92]. They sense changes in the local environment and can be activated by a set of physical and chemical stimuli, making some of them key elements of tumorigenesis. For example, TRPC6 and TRPV6 govern NFAT translocation that is critical for proliferation. Mechanosensitive TRPV2 and TRPM7 determine cancer cell migration and invasion [40].
Due to the essential role of the most studied store-operated Ca2+ ion channel, the CRAC channel, in the co-regulation with Ca2+-dependent K+ ion channels in cancer, we focus initially on its currently known structure/function relationship as well as its individual role in cancer. It is composed of the stromal interaction molecule, STIM, containing its Ca2+ sensor embedded in the ER lumen [93,94,95,96], and the highly Ca2+-selective ion channel Orai in the PM [97,98,99,100,101,102]. Emerging evidence reveals that STIM and Orai proteins are predominant Ca2+ entry mechanisms in most cancer cells [80,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110] and promote various cancer hallmarks [80,103,104,105,106,108,109,111].

2.1. CRAC Channels

CRAC channels, composed of STIM and Orai proteins, are distinguished by their activation mechanism via the release of Ca2+ from the ER. Precisely, ligand binding to PM receptors leads to the activation of G-proteins, which initiate the production of phospholipase C to generate IP3 from phosphatidylinositol-biphosphate (PIP2). Subsequently, IP3 couples to the IP3 receptor in the ER membrane, which triggers ER-Ca2+ store depletion [74,112,113,114,115,116,117]. The latter induces the conformational change and oligomerization of STIM proteins [110,118] and consequently their coupling to Orai Ca2+ ion channels [119] in the PM [120,121] (Figure 3A). In a healthy body, STIM and Orai proteins are mainly involved in immune cell function [97], but they also contribute to the regulation of muscle cells or brain function [80,103,104,105,106,108,109,111,122,123,124,125,126,127].

2.1.1. STIM Proteins

The STIM protein family, including the two homologs STIM1 and STIM2 (also called STIM2.2) [118,124,128] (Figure 3B), is further enriched by the corresponding splice variants STIM1L, STIM1A, and STIM1B and STIM2.1 and STIM2.3, respectively [129,130,131,132]. Of the STIM protein family, STIM1 and STIM2 in particular are ubiquitously expressed in many tissues [111,124,128,129,130,131,133,134,135]. In the following, we will focus on STIM1 and STIM2, because only these two isoforms have been described as playing a role in cancer.
In general, the STIM structure consists of a single-pass TM domain with the N-terminus embedded in the ER lumen and its long C-terminal tail exposed to the cytosol. The N-terminus senses fluctuations in Ca2+ levels, and the C-terminus relays the activation signal to Orai1 in the PM [119]. The STIM1 N- and C-terminus and the TM domain contribute to structural rearrangements upon STIM’s activation [136,137,138] (Figure 3B).
Specifically, the luminal side of STIM1 comprises the Ca2+-sensing EF-hand domain in a complex with the sterile alpha motif (SAM) region. In the resting state, the EF-SAM domain is folded into a compact structure that is stabilized by hydrophobic interactions [139]. Upon Ca2+ store depletion, Ca2+ ions dissociate, leading to destabilization of the EF-SAM complex, which initiates signal transmission to the C-terminus [140,141,142,143,144].
Next, the activation signal of Ca2+ store depletion is conveyed from the N- to the C-terminus via the STIM1 TM domain. Two TM domains within a STIM1 dimer are considered to form a crossing angle that alters upon activation [142]. In support, a cysteine crosslinking screen uncovered that in the resting state, only the C-terminal portions of the STIM1 TM domains are in close proximity. In the active state, the N-terminal TM segments are closer together, possibly changing the crossing angle of the cytosolic C-termini [140].
Upon Ca2+ store depletion, the STIM1 C-terminal domain undergoes an extensive conformational rearrangement to change from a folded quiescent to an extended state, which leads to the exposure of STIM1 oligomerization and Orai1 coupling sites. The STIM1 C-terminus is composed of three typical protein–protein interaction domains known as coiled-coil regions (CC1, CC2, CC3), the inhibitory [145] or CRAC modulatory domain [146], the microtubule end-binding domain (EB), the Ser/Pro-rich region [94], and the lysine-rich region [147,148] (Figure 3B).
In the closed state, STIM1 is locked by intramolecular interactions between the C-terminals CC1 and CC3. The inhibitory clamp formed by a segment of CC1 (CC1α1) and CC3 of monomers within a dimer is further modulated by intrahelical interactions within two other parts of CC1 (CC1α2 with CC1α3) [149,150,151]. Upon activation, this intramolecular inhibitory clamp is released, and the STIM1 C-terminus changes into an extended conformation, which is stabilized by homomeric interactions between CC1 and CC3 of different STIM1 proteins [100,142,152,153]. Thereby, the STIM1-Orai1 coupling site is released.
A minimal portion of the STIM1 C-terminus called CAD (CRAC-activating domain) or SOAR (STIM1-Orai1-activating region) is sufficient for coupling to and activation of Orai channels. They include mainly CC2 and CC3 [99,102,154,155]. Currently, the structural resolutions of two slightly distinct SOAR-like fragments are available [149,152,156,157]. Both structures indicate that two SOAR monomers are arranged in an anti-parallel manner to form a dimer. Despite the essential inter- and intramolecular interaction sites being uncovered, the overall conformation of the two dimeric structures is relatively distinct [156,157]. A recent single-molecule FRET approach revealed more similarities with the CC2-CC3 crystal structure than the CC1α3-CC2 NMR structure [150], but further structural studies of STIM1 fragments or full-length STIM1 are highly awaited. In the quiescent state, the inhibitory clamp hides the CAD/SOAR region for coupling to Orai1. Critical Orai1 coupling sites are supposed to be located at the connection of CC2 and CC3, the so-called apex (F394) [158], and the N-terminal (L373, A376) [159] (Figure 3B). In the tightly packed, inactive conformation, the apex is oriented to the ER [150,158]. STIM1 activation is assumed to lead to an unfolding of the C-terminus, thus allowing the apex to reach the PM, couple to Orai1, and finally activate Ca2+ influx.

2.1.2. Orai

Orai proteins activated by STIM1 function as highly Ca2+-selective ion pores in the PM. The Orai protein family comprises three human Orai paralogs, namely, Orai1–3 (Figure 3C) [121,160]. All three isoforms are ubiquitously expressed in many tissues [135,161,162,163]. RNA transcripts of Orai1 and Orai2 are found primarily in the spleen, lymph nodes, appendix, bone marrow, and brain, whereas Orai3 is detected more in the prostate, placenta, ovaries, testis, adrenal, urinary bladder, thyroid, endometrium, kidney, liver, and many other tissues [135,161,162,163]. Of note, the expression of Orai3 is restricted, because it is found only in mammals [164].
Orai proteins consist of four TM domains (TM1–TM4) connected by two extracellular and one intracellular loop and flanked by a cytosolic N- and C-terminus [165,166,167]. The N-, C-terminus and the intracellular loop region (loop2) [168,169] are crucial for STIM1-mediated Orai1 activation, whereas the Orai1 C-terminus (L273) is the main STIM1 coupling site [101,138,170,171,172]. The STIM1/Orai1 association pocket (SOAP) has been resolved by NMR with fragments of STIM1 (aa 312–387) and Orai1 (aa 272–292) [156]. The identified key sites responsible for STIM1/Orai1 coupling are in line with experimental findings [154,156,173]. Additionally, the loop2 region functions as a STIM1-Orai1 gating interface after the functional coupling of STIM1 to the Orai1 C-terminus [99,136,174]. As for the N-terminus, functional results indicate that it contributes to STIM1-dependent Orai1 activation; however, it is still a matter of debate whether it forms a direct STIM1 coupling site [10,100,136,137,138,156,159,169,175,176].
Structural resolutions of the Drosophila melanogaster Orai (dOrai) and corresponding gain-of-function (GoF) dOrai (dOrai H206A, dOrai P288L) mutants consistently exhibit a hexameric assembly of Orai subunits. Based on the high homology of dOrai to human Orai1 (hOrai1) within the TMs, it is assumed that hOrai1 also forms a hexamer. Of the four TM domains, the first TMs (TM1s) form an inner ring lining the pore in the center of the channel [119,177,178,179]. This is composed of a Ca2+ accumulation region at the extracellular side followed by the selectivity filter (E106), the hydrophobic cavity (F99, V102), and at the cytosolic side, the basic region. Interestingly, TM1 expands helically approximately 20 Å into the cytosol, forming an extension of the Ca2+ ion pore [10,112,113,114,119,136,180]. This cytosolic region constitutes the last third of the Orai N-terminus, which is also referred to as the extended TM Orai N-terminal (ETON; aa 73–90) region (Figure 3C) [136]. The pore-lining helix is surrounded by TM2s and TM3s forming a middle ring and by TM4s as the outer ring of the channel complex [119]. In addition to the Ca2+ ion pore, another essential feature of the Orai1 complex represents its periphery, composed of TM4 and the C-terminus [138,170]. The closed-state structural resolutions exhibit a kink at P245 in TM4 and a bent connection to the helical C-terminus [119,170]. The open state structures suggest conformational rearrangements in these areas, although the extent of these structural changes is still a matter of debate. Nevertheless, this information led to the hypothesis that STIM1 coupling to its main coupling site within Orai1, the C-terminus, and its subsequent interplay with the loop2 allosterically connected to the nexus region [169,170,174], triggers pore opening via a wave of interdependent TM domain motions [181,182]. The latter is supported by the fact that a set of positions within all TM domains (e.g., H134, V181, P245) function as gating checkpoints, as their mutation can lead to either gain- (GoF) or loss-of-function (LoF), depending on the amino acid substitution. Moreover, several LoF mutations act dominantly over GoF mutations in various combinations, proving that a global conformational change of the channel complex is essential for pore opening [181,182].
The general structure of the three Orai isoforms is comparable, yet they have an overall sequence identity of 50–60%, with TM1 being identical among the three Orai proteins, whereas the other TM domains are approximately 81–87% similar (Figure 3C). The cytosolic and extracellular regions exhibit greater differences, with the N-terminus (aa 1-90) showing 34% and the C-terminus (aa 265–301) 46% sequence identity [164]. For the extracellular (loop1, loop3) and intracellular (loop2) loop regions, loop1 is 60–80% [147], loop2 is 80–90% [169], and loop3 is only 20–30% conserved [164]. These differences account for a number of isoform-specific functional differences, such as current size, inactivation, or binding affinity to STIM1 [10,114,136,169,183,184,185,186] and might be promising targets for potential pharmacological interference [170,171].
In summary, CRAC channel activation represents a multistep activation cascade involving STIM1 unfolding, STIM1 oligomerization, STIM1-Orai1 coupling, and Orai1 activation. Resolving these different intermediate activation states could help researchers to find new targets for selective therapeutic strategies also in cancer. In particular, the isoform-specific differences of Orai channels might be promising in cancer-type-specific drug discovery and therapy development [185]. Nevertheless, several aspects remain still to be clarified, such as whether STIM1 also binds to the N-terminus of Orai1, the detailed STIM1/Orai1 binding pockets aside from the already known one formed by their C-termini, the stoichiometry of the STIM1/Orai1 complex for maximal activation, and additional isoform-specific differences in the structure/function relationship.

2.1.3. CRAC Channels and Cholesterol-Rich Regions

Increasing evidence reveals that membrane proteins are localized in microdomains containing especially cholesterol, sphingolipids such as sphingomyelin, and glycosphingolipids [187]. These cholesterol-rich regions provide platforms required for membrane protein sorting and the assembly of signaling machinery, thus dictating protein–lipid and protein–protein interactions. In cancer, too, the remodeling of Ca2+ ion channels may involve their altered arrangement and interplay in the membrane due to structural rearrangements of the channel, assembly of the channel complex, or channel interaction with regulatory proteins that affect their function [3]. In the context of lipid-driven regulation of STIM1 and Orai1, there is increasing evidence that the function of the STIM1/Orai1 complex is modulated by/within cholesterol-rich regions [188,189], although STIM1 and Orai1 are sufficient to form the CRAC channel [190]. This dependence on lipids is not surprising, given the coincidence of STIM1-Orai1 coupling and their activation at ER–PM junctions [191]. The function of STIM1 and Orai1 is affected by direct interaction with some lipids, including phospholipids PIP2 and PI4P, cholesterol, and sphingomyelin [192,193,194,195,196,197].
Specifically, PIP2 modulates STIM1 function via direct binding to its C-terminal end, a lysine-rich region [99,198,199,200,201]. This allows STIM1 to stably interact with PIP2 and PIP3 located in cholesterol-rich regions in the PM [189,199,202,203,204,205]. Hence, STIM1 first couples with PM-localized PIP2 and PIP3 in cholesterol-rich regions before interacting directly with Orai1 [206]. The N-terminus of Orai1 also contains a polybasic region that is sensitive to PIP2 and is therefore essential for modulating Orai1 in membrane domains with different PIP2 content [207]. However, it is currently difficult to analyze the modulatory role of PIP2 on Orai1 due to its dependence on STIM1. Moreover, the precursor of PIP2, PI4P, regulates CRAC channel function [203,208,209], but the detailed mechanisms remain to be determined.
Cholesterol affects CRAC channel function via direct interaction with STIM1 and Orai1. Both CRAC channel proteins contain a cholesterol-binding motif, namely, the cholesterol recognition amino acid consensus motif (-L/V-(X)(1-5)-Y-(X)(1-5)-R/K-; X represents from one to five any amino acids before the next conserved residue) [210,211,212,213]. In STIM1, it is located in the C-terminus (aa 357–366) [195], and in Orai1, it is formed by aa 74–83 in the ETON region [113]. In both cases, the mutation of key residues therein, which have been demonstrated to disrupt cholesterol binding, led to enhanced store-operated STIM1-mediated Orai1 currents, in accordance with the effect observed upon cholesterol depletion. Overall, this suggests that STIM1 and Orai1 coordinate analogous cholesterol-dependent mechanisms of CRAC channel regulation. Regarding the impact of chemical cholesterol depletion, there are still conflicting results. Interestingly, though cholesterol depletion by methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MßCD) reduced endogenous SOCE [214], cholesterol oxidase- or filipin-induced reduction in membrane cholesterol enhanced endogenous SOCE [113]. Moreover, MßCD internalizes Orai1, which could be rescued by caveolin (Cav-1) overexpression, a key component of cholesterol-rich regions [196]. Interestingly, other studies have reported that MßCD application to cells overexpressing STIM1 and Orai1 had either no inhibitory [193] or enhancing effects on STIM1-mediated Orai1 currents [195]. Such distinct effects could potentially occur due to distinct expressions of the respective proteins. Alternatively, these observed differences are probably attributable to the milder manipulation of cholesterol levels or distinct membrane composition due to the application of cholesterol oxidase or filipin compared to MßCD.
Sphingomyelin, which is also abundant in cholesterol-rich regions, controls CRAC channel function. Indeed, the application of sphingomyelinase (SMase) D diminished CRAC channel currents without impacting Ca2+ store depletion. However, whether this modulatory role occurs due to direct binding or allosterically is still unknown [215,216].
Additionally, STIM1 and Orai1 undergo S-acylation, the posttranslational tethering of a medium-length fatty acid, to a cysteine—in these cases, C437 in STIM1 and C143 in Orai1. S-acylation of STIM1 controls its puncta formation and maximal activation of CRAC channels [217]. In Orai1, S-acylation is mediated by the protein acyl transferase (PAT) 20 and controls Orai1 trafficking, activation, and maintenance of its accumulation in cholesterol-rich domains essential for downstream signaling [197].
Additionally, perturbations to plasma membrane lipids affect other proteins that impact STIM1 and Orai1 expression and function. These include a variety of lipid- or ER-PM transition-dependent accessory proteins at the ER–PM contact sites [218], as we recently reviewed in detail [187]. Briefly, these include proteins situated in the ER that can establish direct or indirect interactions with the PM, namely, the Extended-synaptotagmins (E-Syts) with E-Syt 1-3 [219], GRAMD2A [220], and Anoctamin 8 (ANO8) [221]. They are involved in controlling the formation of ER–PM contact sites as well as the lipid composition, especially PIP2, of the membranes, thereby having various effects on the modulation of STIM1/Orai1 coupling and function. Additionally, ER- or PM-associated proteins located in the ER-PM junctions, in particular, septins [222,223,224,225,226,227], junctate [228,229], RASSF4 [229], STIMATE [230], SARAF [205,231,232], and Cav-1 [196,233,234,235,236] modulate the interplay of STIM1 and Orai1. Furthermore, the interplay of lipids with channels, as reported for TRPC1, affects the function of CRAC channel components. Though Cav-1-dependent translocation of TRPC1 into cholesterol-rich regions allows its store-operated activation via STIM1 binding [237,238,239,240], in the absence of Cav-1, TRPC1 is moved out of cholesterol-rich regions to function as an agonist-dependent and STIM1-independent channel [241,242,243].
The fact that the CRAC channel complex is not a closed entity but can be modulated by a variety of proteins and lipids in the vicinity of the ER–PM contact sites highlights the multiple regulatory possibilities that may also play a role in the pathogenesis of cancer and could be exploited for therapeutic applications.

2.2. CRAC Channels and Cancer

Although CRAC channels are one of the most important pathways for the cellular Ca2+ influx to maintain healthy body functions [244], there is increasing evidence that they are a major source of Ca2+ influx into cancer cells, where they are linked to tumorigenesis. This is due to either altered expression of CRAC channel proteins [81,83,103,104,105,108,109,111,122,126,245,246], specifically, STIM1/STIM2, Orai1, and Orai3 in cancer cells compared with healthy cells or mutations in STIM1 or Orai1 proteins. Such dysregulations can promote the proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastatic spread of cancer cells and be responsible for a poor prognosis and high mortality rate of patients suffering from certain cancer types [85,86,247,248,249,250,251] (Figure 4A–C).

2.2.1. Cancer Associated with Distinct Expression Levels of CRAC Channel Proteins

Distinct expression levels of STIM and Orai compared to corresponding healthy tissues have been detected in cells of the breast [82,252,253], cervical [248], colorectal [85,86,254], esophageal [255], gastric [53], glioblastoma [88,256], hepatocellular carcinoma [251,257], leukemia [87,89], liver [251,258], lung [84,259,260], multiple myeloma [261,262], ovarian [263,264], pancreatic [265,266], and prostate [80,267,268,269,270] cancer and others [83]. Whether CRAC channel proteins are up- or downregulated to promote cancer development and progression depends on the cancer type [80,82,104,249,253,255,259,264,265,266,271]. However, in several tumor cells, upregulation of one or more of the CRAC channel components, mostly STIM1 and Orai1, promotes the development of cancer hallmarks [80,82,104,249,252,253,255,259,264,265,266,271,272] (Table 1).
Notably, other molecular components also contribute to STIM- or Orai-dependent cancer progression. Altered expression and function of the molecular components of SOCE include not only CRAC channel components, such as Orai1 and Orai3, but also other Ca2+ ion channels, for instance, the canonical transient receptor potential channels, which have been found in breast cancer (TRPC1 and TRPC6) [104] and ovarian cancer (TRPC1, TRPC3, TRPC4, TRPC6) [263]. Chronic lymphocyte leukemia (CLL) is associated with dysregulated Ca2+ signaling in dependence with not only STIM1 and Orai1, but also TRPC1 [89]. Moreover, in the human hepatoma cell line (Huh-7), Ca2+ entry occurs via a molecular complex of TRPC6, STIM1, and Orai1 controlling cell proliferation [258]. In the breast cancer cell line, MCF-7, a novel STIM1-independent mechanism for triggering Ca2+ entry through Orai1 activation via the accessory protein Secretory Pathway Ca2+-ATPase 2 (SPCA2) has been identified [278]. Physiologically, SPCA2 is known to function as a Golgi Ca2+ pump, where it is involved in protein glycosylation, sorting, and processing. However, in this cancer cell line, there is a direct interaction of the N- and C-termini of SPCA2 with Orai1 at the cell surface, which controls EMT [83,278]. These cancer cell-specific coregulations of ion channels offer the possibility of finding selective, cancer-type-specific therapeutic targets. In the following, the current knowledge on the role of STIM and Orai proteins in tumor development is summarized.

2.2.2. Proliferation

In several tumor types, enhanced proliferation correlates with ectopic STIM1/Orai1 expression [40,53,79,81,88,249,252,256,258,263,266,276,277]. In some cases, either STIM1, Orai1, or both have been shown to impact certain phases in the cell cycle. Supportively, downregulation of STIM1 and/or Orai1 results in cell cycle arrest at either G0/G1 (glioblastoma [256]), G1/S (cervical [274], gastric [53], cancer) or G2/M transitions (cervical [248], esophageal cancer [255]) due to altered expression of corresponding cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and cell cycle division phosphatases (G1/S: cyclin D1/CDK4 [53,88]; cyclin E/CDK2 [274], cdc25 [248]; G2/M: cyclin B1/cdc2 [255]), and/or proliferation inhibitors ((p. 21 [248]), (p. 27 [255])). Interestingly, in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549, down-regulated Orai1 expression promoted proliferation. Indeed, overexpression of Orai1 led to decreased cyclin D expression and cell cycle arrest in G1 [79,279]. In addition, it abolished another oncogenic pathway modulating proliferation, namely, the EGF proliferative effect along with inhibited Akt phosphorylation [79,279]. In melanoma cells, STIM1- and Orai1-dependent regulation of proliferation occurs through the CaMKII/Raf-1/ERK signaling pathway [276] (Figure 4A). Interestingly, a correlation between STIM1 and Orai1 expression and specific cell cycle regulators has been found in most cancers, providing targeted therapeutic options. However, in several cancer types, it remains unexplored how Ca2+ entry via the STIM1/Orai1 machinery affects the various cell cycle effectors, either directly via Ca2+-binding proteins or indirectly via transcription factors, Ras/ERK, or PI3K/Akt pathways.
In some cancer types, Orai3 and/or STIM2 expression exerts pro-proliferative effects by influencing the cell cycle via various signaling cascades (Figure 4A). In ER+ breast cancer cells, SOCE is mediated exclusively by Orai3 and STIM1/STIM2, whereas in ER- breast cancer cells, the canonical CRAC channel consists of STIM1/Orai1, which is sufficient to trigger SOCE [126]. Specifically, in the estrogen receptor-α (ERα) expressing (ER+) breast cancer cells (MCF-7), Ca2+ entry via Orai3 targets the proto-oncogenic transcription factor c-myc via the MAPK (originally named ERK) pathway to trigger cell proliferation arrest [126], contributing to ER+ breast tumorigenesis [127]. Indeed, Orai3 silencing resulted in decreased c-myc activity and ERK levels and G1 phase cell cycle arrest [126]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Orai3 knock-down resulted in decreased cell proliferation due to a halted cell cycle in the G2/M-phase [266]; however, the underlying mechanism for Orai3-dependent cell cycle regulation is unknown.
In other cancer types, enhanced Orai3 expression increased Orai1/Orai3 heteromeric formation and thus reduced the number of functional Orai1 channels [269] (Figure 4A). In prostate cancer biopsies, AA-mediated activation of Orai1/Orai3 channels enhanced intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which controls cell proliferation via Ca2+/CN-dependent activation of the transcription factor NFAT. Interestingly, in mouse models, Orai3 silencing controls the G1/S phase cell cycle by decreasing cyclin D1 expression. Conversely, Orai3 overexpression promoted proliferation [269]. Another study [267] suggested heteromeric Orai1/Orai3 channel formation, whereby Orai3 expression is downregulated in cancer, thus altering the Orai1/Orai3 ratio. Higher Orai3 expression, elevated noncanonical Orai1/Orai3 channel formation and controlled proliferation via cell cycle progression of non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma [249,259]. In support, Orai3 silencing resulted in downregulated cyclin D1 and E expression and reduced Akt phosphorylation, which is associated with reduced proliferation and G1-phase cell cycle arrest [249]. This particular isoform-specific role of Orai3 in different cancers together with isoform-specific features and functionality [185] provides the opportunity for more targeted therapeutic developments.

2.2.3. Cell Survival and Cell Death

Apoptosis resistance is another cancer hallmark connected to up- or downregulated expression and function of CRAC channel components.
The androgen-independent stage of prostate cancer, which represents an aggressive phenotype, is manifested by downregulated Orai1 expression, which leads to apoptosis resistance. In accordance, SOCE is abrogated in these androgen-independent prostate cancer cells [80]. Supportively, overexpression of Orai1 not only restored SOCE but also induced a similar rate of apoptosis in an aggressive type of prostate cancer cells compared to androgen-dependent cells [80]. It is therefore assumed that androgen plays a role in regulating Orai1 expression. Noteworthy, sequence analysis of the Orai1 promoter revealed several palindromic, dihexameric motifs, also known as androgen-responsive elements, that identify androgen receptor binding sites [80]. These results indicate that downregulated androgen receptors ultimately deregulate Orai1 in the aggressive, androgen-independent stage of prostate cancer, resulting in decreased SOCE and increased apoptotic resistance. It remains to be resolved whether, in androgen-independent prostate cancer, the Ca2+ crosstalk between ER and mitochondria and/or balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic factors is altered and thus determines apoptosis resistance. Nevertheless, prostate cancer cells benefit from the abrogated SOCE, whereas upregulated SOCE has a pro-survival and pro-migration effect in several other cancer cell types [53,82,108,248,257,272,275,276]. Although these two scenarios are opposing, they both represent a major advantage for cancer cells and leave room for further investigations. Among other CRAC channel components, the downregulation of STIM2 contributes to apoptotic resistance of HT29 colorectal cancer cells, whereas TRPC1 and Orai1 expression was enhanced [254]. Moreover, Orai3 plays a role in apoptotic resistance in breast cancer cells. There, it controls the expression of the p53 protein via the pro-survival PI3K pathway [253]. These findings again suggest the potential for isoform-specific treatments (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the impact of CRAC channels on apoptosis has been reported only for a few cancer types. The detailed mechanisms of the effects on apoptotic pathways remain to be explored.

2.2.4. Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), Migration, and Invasion

CRAC channel components are further of great importance in EMT, migration, and invasion of tumor cells [82,127,255,263,278,280]. In most cancer types, including breast [82], gastric [53], glioblastoma [88,256], melanoma [108,276], and renal [277] cancer, migration and metastasis have been identified to be controlled by both STIM1 and Orai1. Interestingly, in cervical [248], colorectal [85], and liver [257] cancer, only STIM1 has been detected to be critical, and in esophageal [255] cancer, only Orai1 has so far been detected as such. Additionally, Orai2 in the hematologic tumor type, acute myeloid leukemia cells (AMLC) [245], and STIM2 in melanoma [108] manifest the invasive phenotype of the respective cancer types [53,81,106,257,272,280].
The expression of important markers of EMT and requisite regulators of mesenchymal cell migration, such as vimentin or fibronectin, is downregulated in esophageal [255] and gastric [53] cancer upon STIM1 and/or Orai1 silencing. The transition to a more motile and invasive tumor type was accompanied by a loss of E-cadherin function, which was upregulated upon the knock-down of Orai1 in esophageal [255] and gastric cancer [53].
Among factors that promote cell migration, the expression level of small GTPases Ras or Rac is critical in STIM1- and/or Orai1-dependent cancer types, as reported in breast [82] and esophageal cancer cells [255]. Moreover, the function of the Pyk2 kinases and the protease calpain, which control cytosolic scaffold proteins (e.g., α-spectrin) and thus focal adhesion dynamics, is modulated by STIM1 in migratory cervical cancer cells [248]. Indeed, silencing STIM1 attenuates invasive migration of cervical cancer cells, whereas overexpressed STIM1 enhances it [248]. In glioblastoma cells, Orai1 expression is upregulated and linked to their enhanced invasion by controlling the phosphorylation of kinase Pyk2 [272]. CRAC channel proteins are further involved in the regulation of cancer cell migration by controlling the expression of FAK through phosphorylation. Whereas in AMLC, Orai1 and Orai2 control the expression of FAK to promote focal adhesion formation [261], in liver cancer, STIM1 is critical for FAK dephosphorylation to initiate detachment of focal adhesions [256], indicating the important potential of isoform-specific therapeutic targets (Figure 4C).
The reversal of EMT in a highly aggressive type of breast cancer depends on the enhanced expression of SPCA2, which triggers constitutive Ca2+ influx via Orai1 [273] (Figure 4C). This potentially occurs via Ca2+-dependent Wnt signaling. Specifically, increased Ca2+ levels phosphorylate CaMKII and ß-catenin, thereby switching off Wnt and subsequently inhibiting EMT [273]. Moreover, increased SPCA2 levels correlate with decreased vimentin expression, an important mesenchymal marker [273].
In colorectal cancer, it is exceptional that the progression is governed by the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) playing a role in the prostaglandin (PGE2, prostaglandin E2) synthesis. It is activated by the Ras/ERK pathway [23,281,282,283,284,285] and has been also shown to require Ca2+ entry and the subsequent activation of transcription factors, NFAT, and CREB [284]. Enhanced production of PGE2 as well as basal and EGF-induced COX-2 expression trigger STIM1-dependent migration. Blocking COX-2 by chemical modulation inhibited colorectal cancer cell migration. Ectopic expression of COX2 and PGE2 sufficiently rescued the effect of STIM1 knock-down, indicating that colorectal cancer cell migration mediated by STIM1 originates from its regulation of COX-2 expression and subsequent PGE2 synthesis. Upregulated expression of STIM1 in colorectal cancer cells induced EMT, whereas STIM1 knock-down showed the opposite effect [86] (Figure 4C). Interestingly, STIM1 was determined to be a direct target of miR-185, a microRNA (miRNA), in colorectal cancer tissues and cell lines.
At this point, the effectors (Pyk2, Ras) by which STIM1 and COX-2/PGE2 affect EMT (vimentin, E-cadherin) as well as migration have not been explored in detail.

2.2.5. Hypoxia Linked to CRAC Channel Components in Cancer

Hypoxia-dependent enhancements in Ca2+ levels can underlie the upregulation of Orai channels; however, the mechanism underlying their upregulation remains unknown. Regarding Orai1, it has been shown to upregulate in breast, colon, and glioma cancer cells due to hypoxia together with TRPC6 [63]. This enhanced expression is associated with the Notch pathway, and silencing or inhibition of Notch1 led to reduced Orai1 and TRPC6 expression. In breast cancer cells, enhanced Ca2+ levels due to hypoxia were diminished by the application of SKF-96365, a CRAC channel blocker [62,63,64,286,287]. In various breast cancer cells, hypoxia increased Orai3 expression, though the expression levels of other Orai isoforms were unaffected. Remarkably, silencing Orai3 under these conditions failed to reduce SOCE, suggesting that hypoxia is not the only pathway for the upregulation of Orai3 [62] (Figure 4D). An alternative mechanism of positive regulation of Orai3 expression might underlie the action of certain microRNAs (miR), miR18a and miR18b, as recently demonstrated [125]. In another study, the upregulation of Orai3 together with TRPC1 in breast cancer has been linked to HIF-1α, as its silencing reduced the expression of both channels [62,286]. Moreover, hypoxia is capable of inducing EMT [56]. In colon cancer progression, hypoxia augmented Orai1 and Orai3 expression as well as SOCE by increasing the expression of the hypoxia-dependent transcription factor HIF-1/2 [275].
In summary, the role of CRAC channel components in carcinogenesis is multifaceted and depends on the type of cancer, the affected cancer features, as well as the impaired signaling pathway. On the one hand, this opens up targeted therapy opportunities. In particular, STIM2 or Orai3 may function as a therapeutic target for selective cancer therapy. Nevertheless, a more comprehensive understanding of the respective impaired signaling pathways/proteins is still needed to create a more cohesive picture of the interaction between CRAC channel components and cancer signaling pathways.

2.3. Cancer Associated with Mutations of CRAC Channel Proteins

Several mutations in STIM1 or Orai1 have been associated with cancers such as colorectal tumor (Orai1 A137V) [283], stomach carcinoma (Orai1 M139V) [288], uterine carcinoma (Orai1 S159L) [289], glioblastoma (Orai1 G183D, STIM1 S116N) [290], neck carcinoma (Orai1 G247S) [291], lung adenocarcinoma (STIM1 A79T, E87Q, W350L, G446C/V) [144], and skin melanoma (STIM1 T517I, S521L) [292] (Figure 5).
All these cancer-related Orai1 mutants have been reported to lead to constitutive activity independent of STIM1 [290]. This likely triggers abnormal Ca2+ levels, which might be responsible for the cancer development. Mechanistically, most of these mutations (Orai1 A137, M139, G183, G247) are located at key checkpoints in the Orai TM domains controlling pore opening. Their manipulation likely initiates a global conformational change that finally induces pore opening [182]. Position S159 in Orai1 is located in the loop2 region, which is essential in transferring the gating signal of STIM1 to the pore [293] and controlling the inactivation of STIM1/Orai1 currents [146,294]. However, further studies are still required to understand why this mutation triggers constitutive activity, as it is not directly located in the TM domains.
Among the STIM1 mutants identified to occur in cancer, several (STIM1 H72R, D76V, D78G, A79T, N80K, E87Q, L92P [144]) are located in the canonical EF hand and the hydrophobic cleft and have been found to trigger constitutive activation. Specifically, they lead to constitutive STIM1 cluster formation and consequently to constitutive Ca2+ influx through Orai1 channels. The mechanistic role of S116N, located in the non-canonical EF hand, is still unknown. Several other cancer-related mutants are located in the STIM1 C-terminus, which is essential in both maintaining the quiescent state and establishing CRAC channel activation. For instance, W350L is located in the CC2 of STIM1, part of the minimal region sufficient to activate Orai1, and G446C/V, T517I, and S521L are located in the flexible portion of the STIM1 C-terminus. Further studies are still required to understand their mechanistic impact.

2.4. Therapeutic Approaches Associated with the Expression of CRAC Channel Components in Cancer

The altered expression of Ca2+ ion channels and their interconnectedness with cancer-promoting signaling pathways has opened new possibilities for future therapeutic strategies.
A variety of CRAC channel drugs are available, which has provided valuable insights into CRAC channel mechanisms, but only a few have reached clinical trials due to low selectivity or undesirable side effects. In the treatment of cancer, SKF-96365, a SOCE/Orai1 blocker, has been shown to impair cell proliferation of GBM cells in vitro [256] and metastasis of breast cancer cells in vivo [295]. The CRAC channel inhibitor Diethylstilbestrol (DES), a synthetic ethinyl estrogen, is a possible AR-independent prostate cancer treatment. Hypothetically, DES binds to Orai via steroid-binding sites or even affects channel properties [55]. Synta66, which selectively inhibits Orai1 [296,297], prevents SOCE in three glioblastoma cell lines (U-87 MG, LN-18, A172). Interestingly, it does not affect their division, viability, and migration [298].
Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) interferes indirectly with SOCE via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Tested as a potential therapeutic, it affects the expression of BCL2 members [299,300] in ovarian cancer [301,302]. Therefore, the inhibitory effect of CAI on SOCE in ovarian cancer could be due to both mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and inhibition of Ca2+-dependent survival pathways [55].
Drebrin, an actin-reorganizing protein boosting SOCE, is linked to prostate cancer cell invasion, especially at earlier stages of cancer development. There is evidence that BTP2, an Orai1 inhibitor, targets drebrin [303]. Notably, among pyrazoles, BTP2/Pyr2 and Pyr3 can block Orai1, TRPC3, and STIM1 and inhibit melanoma [276,304].
Additionally, store-operated channels in acute myeloid leukemia cells containing Orai3 have been reported to be targeted by tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, that prevents farnesylation of Ras [305]. This enhanced cytosolic Ca2+ levels through Orai3 and caused cell death of AMLC lines [262].
RP4010, a synergistic drug, prevents SOCE activation by inhibiting Orai1. The drug is undergoing clinical trials and might serve as a treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [306] and esophageal cancer [307].
In addition to their function as drug targets, CRAC channel proteins can facilitate the circumvention of a therapeutic effect, known as therapy resistance. This is particularly challenging in the case of the chemotherapeutic agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin, that induce autophagy and cell death in cancer cells. In hepatocarcinoma tissues, overexpression of Orai1 impairs the effect of 5-FU [251], making Orai1 an indicator of hepatocarcinoma sensitivity to 5-FU. Similarly, 5-FU treatment in pancreatic cancer significantly increased STIM1 and Orai1 expression, impeding cell death [265]. In NSCLC cells, a blockade of SOCE or STIM1 silencing enhanced cisplatin-induced apoptosis, and STIM1 overexpression reduced apoptosis [84]. Supportively, cisplatin-treated cells revealed downregulated STIM1 expression. In another study [308], the expression of Orai3, but not Orai1, has been shown to lead to cisplatin resistance in bronchial biopsies. A shift in the Orai1:Orai3 expression ratio increases SOCE, as well as the levels of cancer stem cell markers, a mechanism potentially linked to the PI3K/Akt pathway [308].
In summary, although several studies have reported the effect of CRAC channel drugs on various cancers, several questions remain to be addressed, such as why cancer cells continue to proliferate and migrate even though the applied CRAC channel drug blocks store-operated currents. Moreover, of the selective CRAC channel drugs currently available, only a few have made it to clinical trials [309]. Thus, there is a need for targeted therapeutic approaches and novel selective drugs. However, because CRAC channels are ubiquitous, targeting them with highly selective agents may still lead to undesirable side effects. Thus, it is important to focus on cancer type-specific deregulated pathways in therapy development, such as the unique SPCA2-Orai1 or SK3-Orai1 co-regulation in breast cancer or the specific role of Orai3 in various cancer types.

3. The Range of Ca2+-Activated Ion Channels

An important property of many ion channels is not only the transport of Ca2+, but other channels also sense Ca2+, either by direct binding of Ca2+ or indirectly by Ca2+-binding proteins, such as CaM [310,311,312]. On Ca2+ channels, Ca2+ often has an inactivating effect, providing a negative feedback mechanism that protects against too much Ca2+ entering the cell [114]. Other ion channel types have evolved such that their opening and closing are regulated by Ca2+, such as Ca2+-activated K+ channels and Ca2+-activated Cl- channels [105,260,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323]. Several members of both channel families are crucial in the proliferation and migration of different cancer types [319,320,321,322,323,324,325,326,327,328,329,330,331]. In the following, we will focus on the structure/function relationship of the Ca2+-activated K+ channels and their role in cancer.

3.1. Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels

Ca2+-activated K+ channels include the large (BK), intermediate (IK or SK4), and small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (KCa2+: SK1, SK2, and SK3) [332,333], whereas the focus here is on SK channels. Structurally, SK channels are comparable to voltage-gated K+ channels, containing six TM regions (S1–S6) with the pore region located between TM5 and TM6 and both the N- and C-termini located at the cytosolic side [315] (Figure 6A). However, they lack the voltage sensor in TM4, leading to their voltage independence [312,317]. SK1, SK2, and SK3 channels possess a conductance of 2-20 pS, whereas for SK4 channels, it is in the range of 20-85 pS [334]. The activation of these SK channels results in hyperpolarization of the membrane potential [332,333]. SK1-3 occurs mainly in the nervous system, whereas SK4 channels are predominantly expressed in epithelial and blood cells and in some peripheral neurons [315,335].
Two cryo-EM structures of the closed and open state of SK4 are currently available [312]. They can be also assumed for the other SK isoforms due to the high sequence similarity between the four SK isoforms. These structural resolutions confirm the tetrameric conformation. The pore formed by a re-entrant loop between S5 and S6 is surrounded by S1 and S4 helices. The S4 and S5 helices are connected by the so-called S4–S5 linker, which consists of two α-helices, S45A and S45B [312] (Figure 6B,C).
SK ion channels are activated by changes in intracellular Ca2+ levels [310,311,315,332]. An increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration activates the SK channel, which triggers K+ efflux from the cell due to the K+ concentration gradient with 140 mM K+ inside and only 5 mM K+ outside [325]. However, SK channels are not able to sense the intracellular Ca2+ concentration directly, but additionally possess the Ca2+-binding protein CaM constitutively bound to the calmodulin-binding domain (CaMBD) in the C-terminus of each α-subunit. Functional studies of SK channels have demonstrated that the CaM C-lobe is constitutively bound to the SK channel, and the N-lobe is bound upon cytosolic Ca2+ elevations [310,311,312,337]. This mechanism has later been confirmed by the SK4 cryo-EM structure, which predicts that four CaM bind to a channel tetramer [312] (Figure 6B). The dynamic and Ca2+-dependent interaction of the CaM N-lobe is formed with the S4–S5 linker of the SK channel and triggers a conformational change within the channel complex to induce pore opening [311,312,315,338]. Specifically, CaM interacts with the S45A, which then moves to the cytosolic side. Additionally, S45B moves away from the pore region, leading to further changes in S6, finally causing channel activation [310] (Figure 6C).
In summary, activation of the SK channel by constitutively bound CaM occurs upon an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels. CaM-Ca2+ binding results in altered binding of CaM and triggers a conformational change of the SK channel that causes pore opening.

3.2. SK Channels and Cholesterol-Rich Regions

Because the interplay between SK3 and Orai1 that triggers breast cancer cell migration occurs in cholesterol-rich regions, we present here recent findings on the individual regulation of SK channels by lipids [292,316,325,329,339,340], specifically, PIP2 and cholesterol.
CaM-dependent activation of SK channels is modulated by PIP2, as PIP2-depletion inhibits SK2 channels. The PIP2 binding site has been identified at the SK–CaM binding interface. CaM phosphorylation causes a change in the interaction of amino acids at the PIP2 binding site and reduces the affinity of SK2 for PIP2 [340].
Regarding cholesterol-dependent modulation of Ca2+-activated K+ channels, it is known that cholesterol-mediated regulation of SK channels is dependent on Cav-1. In contrast, the function of BK and IK channels is regulated by cholesterol independently of Cav-1. Cholesterol inhibits BK channels, possibly due to an altered open probability, but not a change in the unitary conductance [341]. Moreover, the alkyl-ether-lipid Ohmline, which reduces SK3 channel activity, gives a hint of cholesterol-dependent SK3 channel regulation [325,329]. Ohmline triggers membrane disordering with increasing cholesterol levels. Molecular dynamics simulations have shown that Ohmline interacts with the carbonyl and phosphate groups of sphingomyelin and stearoylphosphatidylcholine and, to a lesser extent, with cholesterol. It has therefore been suggested that Ohmline removes cholesterol–OH groups from their major binding sites and forces a new rearrangement with other lipid groups. This leads to membrane restructuring and disorder, which could be a possible explanation for Ohmline-induced inhibition of SK3 channels [339]. Despite these findings, the detailed molecular mechanisms of cholesterol-mediated modulation of KCa2+ channels are still unclear.

3.3. SK Channels and Cancer

SK channels, like CRAC channels, are involved in the development of diverse cancer hallmarks. Gene expression of SK channels was detected in breast cancer (SK2 and SK3) [327], glioma (SK2) [324], medulloblastoma (SK3) [328], melanoma (SK2 and SK3) [342], colon (SK3), and prostate cancer (SK3) [331,343,344,345]. Interestingly, the detected SK transcripts do not necessarily confirm the expression of the functional protein, as reported for the SK2 gene in breast cancer and glioma [324,327]. Transcripts of SK1 have been only detected in tumor biopsies; however, there is no evidence of their functional role there [324,346]. Although it remains unresolved whether ion channels contribute to cell transformation or are a product thereof, targeting ectopic expression of SK channels in a given tissue may offer both prognostic and therapeutic opportunities.
SK4 is expressed in different cancer types, including glioma [347], glioblastoma [348], breast [349], prostate [350], lung [351], hematologic [352], melanoma [353], colorectal [354], renal carcinoma [355], brain tumors [326], pancreas [356], and papillary thyroid [357], thereby controlling cancer hallmarks [358,359,360]. For instance, in primary breast cancer cells [360,361] and various breast cancer cell lines [358], high SK4 expression levels have been found in line with the electrophysiological evidence obtained upon the application of the SK4 activator, TRAM-34. In MDA-MB-231 cells, the suppression of SK4 channels significantly blocks cell proliferation and migration and elevated apoptosis. In colorectal cancer, SK4 contributes to cell migration and invasion, which is related to the dysfunction of proteins of the RAS/ERK pathway (KRAS), hypoxia (HIF1α), and intracellular ROS production [359] (Table 2).
The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer (COSMIC) [365] reports over 642, 1398, 1557, and 371 entries for the SK1, SK2, SK3, and SK4 channels, respectively. However, these entries typically represent the outcome of whole exome and RNA sequencing. To date, no cancer-related mutants of a single SK channel family member, but only disease-related SK3 mutations linked to Zimmermann–Laband Syndrome, were functionally characterized [366].
The development of cancer features triggered by SK channels generally occurs in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Specifically, an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels in SK channel-expressing cells leads to their activation and thus to potassium (K+) efflux, which in turn promotes Ca2+ entry via Ca2+ channels in a positive feedback loop. The increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels achieved in this manner controls Ca2+-dependent cancer hallmarks [105,292,325], as we outline in detail in chapter 4 (Table 2).

3.3.1. Proliferation

Insights into the influence of the SK channel on cell cycle progression have only been gained for SK4. It is able to indirectly control cell cycle progression by driving cellular Ca2+ entry, as inhibition of SK4 led cells to accumulate in the G1 phase, whereas the number of cells in the cell cycle S phase decreased [367,368]. In primary breast tumors, SK4 is essential for growth factor-dependent Ca2+ entry, cell cycle progression, and the proliferation rate of primary breast tumor cells [360] (Figure 7). Obviously, there are only a few studies on the role of SK channels in regulating cell cycle events in cancer cells. Further studies are still needed to understand the molecular mechanisms of SK channels in cancer cell proliferation, in particular, to resolve which cell cycle effectors play a crucial role.

3.3.2. EMT, Migration, and Metastasis

In particular, the SK3 channel contributes to cell migration and metastases (Figure 7). Supportively, siRNA knock-down of SK3 prevented the migration of MDA-MB-435s cells, in accord with their high metastatic potential [327]. Remarkably, other cancerous (MCF-7) and non-cancerous (184A1) breast cell lines, which physiologically lack SK3 expression, increased their migration potential upon induced SK3 expression. Analogously, SK3 is critical for the migration of melanoma cells, as treatment with apamin significantly reduced the migration of certain melanoma cell lines (518A2, Bris, HBL) [342]. Knock-down of SK3 by shRNA abolished 518A2 cell migration, whereas conversely, overexpression of SK3 in non-SK3-expressing cells increased the migration capacity. Additionally, melanoma cell motility has been demonstrated to decrease as a consequence of PM depolarization promoted by increased extracellular K+ concentration. Furthermore, 2D and 3D motility assays suggest that the migration of melanoma cells depends on SK3 activity [342].
SK4 governs oncogenic pathways controlling migration and metastasis. SK4 mRNA expression is enhanced in MDA-MB-231 cells upon the application of growth factors (e.g., EGF) that trigger EMT. Indeed, silencing of SK4 expression abolished the expression of certain EMT markers (e.g., Vimentin) [358] (Figure 7).
Overall, there is evidence that SK channels are present in cancer cells and can control the development of cancer features. However, knowledge about the influence of SK channels on individual steps in signaling cascades regulating the cell cycle or migration is limited. In this context, identification of the effects on key players modulating, for instance, the focal adhesion dynamics (PYK-2, Rac1) is required. A detailed understanding in this regard could improve therapeutic options for cancer cells.

3.4. Therapeutic Approaches Associated with the Expression of SK Channels in Cancer

Drugs targeting SK channels include peptides extracted from scorpions, sea anemone or bee venom, synthetic analogues, and chemically synthesized modulators (e.g., Cyppa, 1-EBIO, NS8593, NS306, TRAM34). However, all of these modulators arose as limited in medical use due to their high toxicity or low efficiency. Among the blockers, particularly those targeting SK4 have been suggested as promising for the treatment of various cancers [325]. Specifically, this compound blocked cell cycle progression in murine breast cancer cells [360], reduced the mass of human endometrial cancer cells (HEC-1-A) [369] and non-small-cell lung cancer cells (A549-3R) [351], or impaired infiltration of glioblastoma [370].
To overcome therapy resistance [371], SK3 and SK4 represent promising candidates. Supportively, the SK3 channel gene is one of 1298 genes contributing to ovarian cancer drug resistance [372]. Notably, in bortezomib-resistant BN myeloma cell lines, 16-fold upregulated gene expression of the SK3 channel has been reported, reflecting its relevance to drug resistance [373]. Cisplatin-resistance of human epidermoid cancer cells is regulated by SK4, due to control of proliferation and regulation of cell volume. Activation of SK4 using 1-EBIO or SKA-31 boosted apoptosis in cisplatin-resistant cancer cells [354,374]. Overexpression of SK4 in breast cancer cells increased resistance to the chemotherapeutic agent gemcitabine by upregulating an anti-apoptotic BCL2-protein [375].
The alkyl-ether lipids edelfosine and Ohmline have emerged as promising lipid-antimetastatic agents. Both block SK3-dependent cancer cell migration and metastasis, likely due to lipid membrane reorganization, which inhibits SK3 channels [325]. Edelfosine, for instance, effectively blocks migration and invasion of urothelial carcinoma cells expressing SK3 [376]. Hypoxia-induced upregulation of SK3 together with the EMT transcription factor Zeb1 in prostate cancer cells is promoted by the anti-androgen Enzalutamide, used for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer [331,377]. Enzalutamide is known to dysregulate Ca2+ signaling, which is crucial for EMT progression, contributing to therapeutic escape [331]. Ohmline could prevent hypoxia-triggered EMT pathways [377] and Enzalutamide-dependent Zeb1 expression [331]. Moreover, Ohmline has been reported to interfere with the co-regulation of SK3 and Orai1 that is crucial in breast, colon, and prostate cancer progression (see Section 5) [320,323].
Overall, alkyl ether lipids appear to be the most promising and selective drug candidates for the treatment of SK3-dependent cancers.

4. Co-Regulation of Ca2+ and K+ Ion Channels Linked to Cancer Development

In addition to their individual role, K+ channels interact with Ca2+ ion channels to control various cellular functions, including also the fine-tuning of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Voltage-gated K+ (Kv) and KCa2+ channels have been classified as Ca2+ amplifiers because of their interplay with Ca2+ channels [321,322,327,360]. These K+ channels, when activated, induce membrane hyperpolarization either by increased intracellular Ca2+ levels in the case of KCa2+ channels or by membrane depolarization in the case of Kv channels, thereby enhancing the driving force for Ca2+ influx. Several studies indicate that co-regulation of K+ (Kv, KCa2+) and Ca2+ channels (P2X7 receptor, CRAC, TRP, voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels) plays a significant role in cancer cell progression, growth, proliferation, and invasion/migration [320,321,322,327,360]. Specifically, the SK3 channel, together with the P2X7 receptor, contributes to the cysteine cathepsin-dependent invasiveness of breast cancer cells [330] (Table 2). Moreover, BK channels have been shown to form molecular complexes with CaV3.2, promoting the proliferation of prostate cancer cells [378]. SK4 (IK) channels have been found to co-immunoprecipitate with TRPV6 in LNCaP cells [319]. Human Ether a-gogo potassium Channel 1 (hEag1) associates with Orai1 and regulates breast cancer cell migration through Orai1-dependent Ca2+ entry [379,380]. The activity and membrane trafficking of these proteins is mediated by SPCA2 promoting a basal Ca2+ influx through store-independent (SICE) Orai1 activation. This trio complex triggers collagen I-induced proliferation and survival of breast cancer cells [381]. The most extensively studied interplay of KCa2+ channels, in terms of structural and functional requirements and their role in cancer, represents that of Orai1 and SK3 [105,292].

4.1. SK3-Orai1 Interplay

Besides the critical role of the physical interaction of SK3 and Orai1 in healthy body functions, as evidenced by its beneficial role in avoiding excessive smooth muscle contraction in the gallbladder smooth muscle of guinea pigs [382], this positive feedback loop contributes to the development of cancer hallmarks (Figure 8). Specifically, breast and colon cancer progression has been demonstrated to be governed by the interplay of SK3 and Orai1. Though both cancer types exhibit SK3 and Orai1 expression [257,311], healthy tissue does not express SK3 channels [320,327,342]. Co-localization of SK3 with Orai1 has been detected via co-immunoprecipitation in breast and colon cancer cells [327,329].
Despite the interplay between SK3 and Orai1 being extensively studied in breast and colon cancer cells (see Section 4.1.2), the molecular determinants required for their co-regulation are poorly characterized. In the following, we describe our recently uncovered key determinants that are essential for their SK3-Orai1 co-regulation.

4.1.1. The Molecular Determinants of the SK3-Orai1 Interplay

We discovered that the interplay between Orai1 and SK3, similar to that in breast and colon cancer cells, also occurs in HEK 293 cells [343]. We demonstrated that the co-expression of Orai1 and SK3 led to significantly higher K+ currents than in the absence of Orai1. This was accompanied by their close co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation, but a direct interaction by FRET could not be detected so far. The inhibition of K+ currents by an inhibitor specific for SK3 channels left tiny inwardly rectifying Ca2+ currents in SK3 and Orai1 co-expressing cells, which could be blocked by La3+. In contrast, K+ currents in SK3-only expressing cells were completely blocked by the SK3 inhibitor (NS8593). This suggests, in agreement with previous findings in cancer cells [320,321,322,323], that the co-occurrence of Orai1 and SK3 increases cytosolic Ca2+ levels specifically through Orai1, which together with SK3 triggers the positive feedback mechanisms [105,325]. Intriguingly, we did not detect enhanced Ca2+ entry in SK3-Orai1 expressing cells, and NFAT translocation was only marginally enhanced. This indicates that already, very low local alterations in Ca2+ levels are sufficient to trigger the SK3–Orai1 interplay. Moreover, we found that K+ currents in SK3 and Orai1 co-expressing cells could be reduced to the level of SK3-expressing cells not only when the general Ca2+ channel blocker La3+ was applied, but also the CRAC channel-specific inhibitor GSK-7975A [343]. Co-expression of Orai1 E106Q with SK3 also resulted in significantly reduced K+ currents compared to the presence of wild-type Orai1, despite their co-localization being maintained (Figure 8A). Moreover, SK3 K+ currents in the presence of Orai1 gradually enhanced with increasing extracellular Ca2+ concentrations and were abolished in the presence of 0 mM Ca2+ or divalent-free Na+ extracellularly, proving that Ca2+ from the extracellular space controls SK3 channel activity. Decreasing intracellular Ca2+ levels using intracellular EGTA strongly reduced (300-500 µM) or abolished (1000 µM EGTA) SK3 K+ currents, both in the absence and presence of STIM1 (Figure 8A). Overall, our results show that SK3 K+ currents are specifically enhanced by Ca2+ influx through Orai1 [343].
In addition to Orai1-mediated enhancement of SK3 K+ currents, CaM is known to act as the Ca2+ sensor that typically controls SK channel activity. We have shown for SK3, in agreement with previous studies [337,383], that CaM wild-type enhances SK3 K+ currents, whereas CaMMUT, containing all four mutated EF-hands, completely abolishes these currents [343,383] (Figure 8A). Regarding SK3/Orai1 co-regulation, a triple expression of Orai1, SK3, and CaM did not strongly enhance K+ currents compared with those obtained in the absence of Orai1. However, SK3 K+ currents completely abolished by CaMMUT could be partially restored by Orai1. Characterization of the FRET of CaM/CaMMUT and SK3 revealed that robust FRET efficiency was reduced in the presence of Orai1. It is plausible that Orai1 sequesters part of CaM. However, since Orai1 can partially restore SK3 function lost due to CaMMUT overexpression, it is possible that Orai1 and CaM proteins compete for an intact SK3–CaM binding site to control SK3 channel activity [343], whereas the nature of the direct or allosteric interplay between Orai1 and SK3 remains to be elucidated.
The molecular determinants within Orai1 that are required for the interplay with SK3 are the N-terminus, except for the first 20 aa, as well as the C-terminus (aa 281–301) and an intact pore geometry, as demonstrated by a set of LoF-Orai1 mutants. They were unable to boost SK3 channel activity without affecting the co-localization with SK3. However, STIM1 coupling to Orai1 or an intact STIM1 coupling site within Orai1 (L273) is not required for intact Orai1-SK3 interplay, as evidenced by the preserved boost of Orai1-mediated SK3 channel activity in CRISPR/Cas9 STIM1/Orai1 DKO HEK 293 cells. In agreement with this, Orai1 L273D was also able to trigger the amplification of SK3 K+ currents [343]. It is still an interesting fact that in contrast to STIM1-mediated Orai1 activation, almost the entire N-terminus, particularly the residues between aa20–70, are also required for an intact SK3/Orai1 co-regulation [343]. This region contains an AC8-binding domain (residues 26–34 [384]), two putative protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation sites (S27 and S30 [385,386]), a putative PIP2-binding sequence (residues 28–33 [207]), and a caveolin (Cav)-binding region (residues 52–60 [233]). It remains to be tested whether any of these factors play a critical role in the interplay of SK3 and Orai1.
Interestingly, co-expression of STIM1 with Orai1 and SK3 showed an inhibitory effect on K+ current amplification under physiological conditions, as STIM1 activation removes Orai1 from SK3, and locally increased Ca2+ levels cannot affect SK3 channel activity. Indeed, global Ca2+ level increases also enabled the amplification of SK3 K+ currents in the presence of STIM1 and Orai1 [343] (Figure 8A). This supports our findings that local, almost undetectable Ca2+ elevations are sufficient to govern the interplay of SK3 and Orai1 in the absence of STIM1 [343]. It remains to be determined whether these observations in dependence on STIM1 play a role in native tissue and cancer.
Our findings validate the hypothesis that Orai1 and SK3 are in close proximity to each other and narrow down critical determinants for this, although a direct interaction could not be confirmed. Further studies are still required to uncover potential molecular links manifesting the store-independent and STIM1-independent interplay of Orai1 and SK3. Among the variety of accessory proteins, SigmaR1, which is known to interact with STIM1 and SK3 (see Section 4.1.2), or SPCA2, reported to interplay with Orai1, could act as critical candidates. Additionally, the lipid environment including SK3-Orai1 clusters may initiate and modulate their interplay, but this first requires a detailed understanding of the molecular role of lipids on the individual channels.

4.1.2. The Interplay of SK3 and Orai1 in Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer Cells

In cancer cells, the SK3-Orai1 complex is located within cholesterol-rich regions, where it triggers a constitutive Ca2+ influx specific to Orai1. This promotes cell migration, a prerequisite for metastases development. This finding is further reinforced by the fact that disruption of cholesterol-rich regions, where Orai1 and SK3 have been shown to form complexes, for example, by Ohmline, leads to loss-of-function and disrupts cancer cell migration [316,320,321,322,323,329]. Whether chemical cholesterol depletion, for instance, by MβCD, has similar effects remains to be investigated. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms and affected markers in how SK3-Orai1 triggers migration are still unknown.
Interestingly, in breast cancer cells, the second member of the CRAC channel, STIM1, does not play a significant role in these processes (Figure 8B), suggesting a distinct pathway of Ca2+ signaling in breast tumors [105,320,321,322,323,325]. Currently, only SPCA2 is known to activate Orai1 in a STIM1-independent manner; however, whether it is a critical factor that stabilizes the interplay with SK3 is unknown [278,381,387]. In contrast, colon cancer cell migration is manifested through the formation of a triple channel complex of the TRPC1/Orai1/SK3 channels in cholesterol-rich regions, which is further facilitated by STIM1 [323]. The assembly of this complex is mediated by EGF phosphorylation of STIM1 and induced activation of the Akt pathway. A positive feedback loop exists: (i) EGF and Akt phosphorylation of STIM1 induce SOCE, which promotes cell migration via the formation of Orai1 and TRPC1 complexes within SK3 channel-rich caveolae-lipid rafts; (ii) Akt activation is triggered by SOCE, which is enhanced by SK3 channel-induced membrane hyperpolarization, which increases the electrochemical driving force to permit Ca2+ entry and SOCE; (iii) and the Akt pathway promotes the activity of Rac1/Calpain, which amplifies SOCE, and consequently Akt. Simply stated, SOCE triggers activation of the SK3 channel and the Akt pathway, which mediates the activity of Rac1/Calpain, which in turn leads to the amplification of SOCE (Figure 8C; Table 3). Disruption of cholesterol-rich regions by Ohmline led to the disassembly of the channel complex, resulting in decreased Akt phosphorylation. Notably, caveolae-lipid rafts function as platforms for EGFR-activated signaling pathways. In colorectal cancer cells, upregulated EGFR expression has been identified and linked to prognostic outcome [388,389]. Since we observed that STIM1 binding to Orai1 reduces the co-localization with SK3 in HEK293 cells [343], it might be interesting to determine whether and how endogenous as well as overexpressed STIM1 affect the co-localization and interplay of SK3 and Orai1 in colon cancer cells.
A further report [321] indicates that the SK3–Orai1 interplay is promoted by the stress-activated chaperone SigmaR1 in breast and colon cancer cells. Specifically, SigmaR1 physically interacts with the SK3 channel, as shown via confocal microscopy studies, whereas the binding site remains to be narrowed down. Noteworthy, upregulated expression of SigmaR1 associates with prognostic outcome and tumor grade. Upon SigmaR1 knock-down or the application of sigma ligand, igmesine, SK3 currents, and constitutive Ca2+ entry was abolished. Remarkably, whereas SigmaR1 knock-down moved both channels to non-raft fractions, the use of igmesine resulted in the dissociation of Orai1 from lipid rafts without disrupting the SK3–SigmaR1 complex. Consequently, the migration of breast and colon cancer cells was impaired [321] (Figure 8B,C). Whether SigmaR1 interacts with Orai1 is currently unknown. Nonetheless, it has been reported that STIM1 can interact with SigmaR1 in HEK 293 cells [390], thus delaying STIM1/Orai1 activation. Whether and how this could affect the Orai1–SK3 co-regulation in cancer cells remains to be investigated.
We recently reported that the SK3 channel is endogenously expressed in cells of the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, where it regulates proliferation [343]. Interestingly, in electrophysiological and immunoblotting experiments, we detected SK3 channel expression only in passages 3–5 of this cell line, but not earlier or later ones. After the forced expression of Orai1 in LNCaP cells, endogenous SK3 currents were significantly boosted in accordance with our findings in HEK 293 cells [343]. Overexpression of the pore mutant Orai1 E106Q failed to promote SK3 currents, indicating that functional Orai1 is required to increase SK3 channel activity. Moreover, CaM overexpression in LNCaP cells promoted SK3-mediated K+ currents, whereas CaMMUT abolished these currents. Remarkably, additional co-expression of Orai1 bypassed the inhibitory effect of CaMMUT [343]. Our results are corroborated by a recent report [331] that showed weak expression of SK3 in LNCaP cells, which could be highly upregulated by Enzalutamide [331,364,377] (Figure 8D; Table 3). It is tempting to speculate that Enzalutamide treatment enforces the co-regulation of SK3/Orai1 in LNCaP cells and allows a more intensive study of key determinants mediating the SK3–Orai1 interplay in this prostate cancer cell line.

5. Perspectives

Cell fate is determined by the finely tuned interplay of signaling cascades involving various cellular components such as CRAC and SK channels. However, their dysregulation/-function can be linked to novel biological functions associated with cancer progression. Mechanistically, dysregulation of CRAC and SK channels can lead to altered activity of a number of effectors of distinct signaling pathways, such as CaM/CaMKII/CN [26,28,273,276], PI3K/Akt [26,249,308,323], or Ras/ERK [21,82,359]. Associations between altered expression of CRAC channel components and affected modulators of cell cycle or migration/metastasis have been found in several cancers [53,81,82,108,245,248,257,272,275,276,277]. However, in most cases, the signaling pathways connecting enhanced Ca2+ entry to the cancer hallmark(s) are not yet elucidated in detail. For instance, proliferation can be directly regulated by Ca2+ via Ca2+-sensing proteins or influence transcriptional activity to modulate the expression of cell cycle effectors. Alternatively, PI3K/Akt or RAS/ERK pathways might be affected by either enhanced expression levels of Ca2+ ion channels and/or the effect of Ca2+ on certain oncogenes in the PI3K/Akt or RAS/ERK pathways. Therefore, it remains open whether Ca2+ modulates only a specific path or multiple ones to impact cancer progression in a given cancer type. In most recent studies, the proliferative activity of related cancer cell lines is monitored upon siRNA-mediated inhibition of ion channels in vitro. Nevertheless, evidence of tumor behaviors in vivo is lacking. At this point, the question arises whether the effects of ion channels on proliferation are not merely coincidental because they interact closely with each other, or, possibly with different more relevant components of the Ca2+ signaling cascade. Concerning the role of CRAC channel proteins in apoptosis, several have been identified to contribute to pro- or anti-apoptotic mechanisms; however, the detailed effects on certain regulators of cell survival/cell death signaling cascades are not yet fully understood. Key questions include how altered STIM/Orai expression might influence the expression of pro/anti-apoptotic factors, and how mitochondrial/ER Ca2+ levels and their interplay are dysregulated. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms of mutations identified to be critical in cancer are only beginning to be deciphered, and their connections to Ca2+ dysregulated signaling pathways remain open. In particular, for SK channels as well as their interplay with STIM1/Orai1, the detailed links to various cancer signaling pathways are insufficiently described.
The multifaceted interplay of these ion channels with intracellular signaling pathways is extended by their interaction with each other and with a set of other signaling components, as exemplified by Orai1-SK3 and Orai1-SPCA2 interplay. For such scenarios, the formation of macromolecular complexes appears favorable. For example, SK3 and Orai1 colocalized in cholesterol-rich regions in breast cancer cells [320], the disruption of which abolished SK3-Orai1 interplay, cancer cell migration, and bone metastasis [316,320,321,323,329,391,392]. Nonetheless, the molecular relationships underlying this complex ion channel formation are not well understood. SPCA2-Orai1 or SK3-Orai1 complexes are known to control breast cancer progression. However, whether a triple complex of SPCA2–Orai1–SK3 strengthens their interplay and is crucial for breast cancer progression requires further investigation. Moreover, TRP channels have been reported as critical components controlling cancer progression together with CRAC channel components; however, the detailed mechanistic underpinning of their interplay requires additional studies. Furthermore, it remains open how lipids regulate individual ion channels and their interplay with each other and with accessory proteins. This suggests that pro-survival and pro-apoptotic events are controlled by a complex regulatory network of modulating proteins and cell type-specific signaling pathways.
Altered expression or mutation of CRAC and SK channels is responsible for poor prognosis in cancer patients. Therefore, these channels could serve as suitable prognostic markers as well as attractive targets for cancer therapy, also in an isoform-specific manner. However, of a large number of CRAC and SK channel drugs available, only Ohmline currently has the potential for future clinical use in SK3/Orai1-driven cancer progression. In addition, the expression of CRAC and SK channels increases resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and promotes cell proliferation, necessitating the need to address alternative targets via potential therapeutic strategies.

6. Conclusions

Overall, among the various members of the Ca2+ signal transduction apparatus, CRAC and SK channels play critical roles in the development of certain cancers. Their modulatory role in Ca2+ signaling affects proliferation, apoptosis, and/or migration. Knowledge of these ion channels and their associated cancer features is extensive but insufficient to develop appropriate therapeutic strategies. A more detailed understanding of the mechanisms of ion channels and their connection to cancer signaling pathways will provide new targets for future and more specific therapeutic strategies against cancer.

Author Contributions

A.T., V.H., and I.D. wrote the manuscript and performed the visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Open Access Funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) projects FWF 30567, FWF 32851, FWF 35900, and FWF 36202 to I.D.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

1-EBIO1-ethylbenzimidazolinone
5-FU5-fluorouracil
Å Angstrom (unit of length equal to 1 × 10−10 m)
aaamino acid
Aktknown as protein kinase B or PKB
AP1activator protein 1
ARandrogen receptor
ASICacid-sensing channels
AMLCacute myeloid leukemia cells
ANO8Anoctamin 8
ATPase adenosine triphosphatase
BCL2B-cell lymphoma 2
BCLxLB-cell lymphoma-extra large
BIDBH3 Interacting Domain Death Agonist
BimBCL2-interacting mediator of cell death
BKlarge conductance, Ca2+-activated potassium channels
Ca2+ calcium ion
CAD Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ activating domain
CAIcarboxyamidotriazole
CaMcalmodulin
CaMBDcalmodulin-binding domain
CaMKcalmodulin kinase
CaMMUTcalmodulin mutant
cAMPcyclic adenosine monophosphate
Cav1Caveolin-1
CC coiled-coil
CDK2/4/6cyclin-dependent kinase
cEFcanonical EF hand
CK2casein kinase 2
CLLchronic lymphocyte leukemia
CNcalcineurin
COSMICcatalogue of somatic mutations in cancer
COX-2cyclooxygenase-2
CRAC Ca2+ Release-Activated Ca2+
CREBcAMP-responsive element binding protein
CRISPR/Cas9clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas
cryo-EMcryogenic electron microscopy
DAGdiacylglycerol
DESDiethylstilbestrol
DKOdouble knock-out
dOrai Drosophila melanogaster Orai
EBend-binding domain
ECMextracellular matrix
EGFepidermal growth factor
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
EGTA ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid
EMTepithelial–mesenchymal transition
ER endoplasmic Reticulum
ERα estrogen receptor-α
ERKextracellular signal-regulated kinase
E-Sytsextended-synaptotagmins
ETONextended transmembrane Orai1 N-terminal
FAKfocal adhesion kinase
FRET fluorescence resonance energy transfer
GBM glioblastoma multiforme cells
GoF gain of function
GPCRG-protein coupled receptor
GRAMD2AGRAM Domain Containing 2A
GSKGlaxoSmithKline compounds
GTPaseguanosine triphosphatase
HBLhuman diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
hEag1human ether a-gogo potassium channel 1
HEK human embryonic kidney
HeLaHenrietta Lacks
HIF-1hypoxia-inducible factor
hOrai1human Orai1
Huh-7human hepatoma cell line
IDinactivation domain
IKintermediate Ca2+ activated K+ channels
IP3 inositol-triphosphate
IP3Rinositol-triphosphate receptor
K+ potassium ion
KCaCa2+ activated K+ channels
KVvoltage-gated potassium channels
Kirinward-rectifier potassium channels
KRASRAS/ERK pathway
La3+lanthanum ion
LGCligand-gated calcium channels
LNCaPlymph node carcinoma of the prostate
LoFloss of function
MACC-1metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinases
MßCDmethyl-beta-cyclodextrin
MCF-7Michigan Cancer Foundation-7
METmesenchymal-epithelial transition
miRNAmicroRNA
MLCKmyosin light chain kinase
MMPsmatrix metalloproteins
nEFnon-canonical EF-hand domain
NFATnuclear factor of activated T cells
NFkBnuclear factor k-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NMRnuclear magnetic resonance
NSCLCchronic lymphocyte leukemia
OASF Orai—activating small fragment
Orai 1–3 Orai proteins (also as O1–3)
PATprotein acyl transferase
PBDpolybasic domain
PGE2prostaglandin E2
PI3Kphosphoinositide 3-kinases
PI4Pphosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate
PIP2phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
PIP3phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphat
PKA protein kinase A
PKC protein kinase C
PLCεphospholipase C
PMplasma membrane
PMCAplasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase
PYK2proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2
Rac1Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1
Rafserine/threonine kinase
Rasrat sarcoma virus
RASSF4Ras Association Domain Family Member 4
Refreferences
RNAribonucleic acid
ROCreceptor-operated channels
ROSreactive oxygen species
RTKgrowth factor receptor tyrosine kinase
SAMsterile α-motif
SARAFstore-operated calcium entry-associated regulatory factor
SCID severe combined immune deficiency
SERCAsarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase
SICEstore-independent calcium entry
SigmaR1Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1
siRNAsmall interfering RNA
SK channels small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels
SMasesphingomyelinase
SMOCsecond messenger-operated channels
SOAPSTIM—Orai association pocket
SOARSTIM—Orai activating region
SOCstore operated channel
SOCE store-operated calcium entry
SPCA2secretory pathway Ca2+-ATPase
STIM stromal interaction molecule
STIMATESTIM Activating Enhancer
TMtransmembrane helices
TRAM-34triarylmethane-34
TRPtransient receptor potential ion channel (C-canonical, M-melastatin, V-vallinoid)
VGCCvoltage-gated calcium channels
WntWingless Int-1

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Prevarskaya, N.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H.; Skryma, R.; Shuba, Y. Remodelling of Ca2+ transport in cancer: How it contributes to cancer hallmarks? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fouad, Y.A.; Aanei, C. Revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 1016–1036. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Prevarskaya, N.; Skryma, R.; Shuba, Y. Ion channels and the hallmarks of cancer. Trends Mol. Med. 2010, 16, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Prevarskaya, N.; Skryma, R.; Shuba, Y. Ion Channels in Cancer: Are Cancer Hallmarks Oncochannelopathies? Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 559–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Roderick, H.L. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Lipp, P. Calcium—A life and death signal. Nature 1998, 395, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Derler, I.; Butorac, C.; Krizova, A.; Stadlbauer, M.; Muik, M.; Fahrner, M.; Frischauf, I.; Romanin, C. Authentic CRAC channel activity requires STIM1 and the conserved portion of the Orai N terminus. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 1259–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Parkash, J.; Asotra, K. Calcium wave signaling in cancer cells. Life Sci. 2010, 87, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Skupin, A.; Thurley, K. Calcium signaling: From single channels to pathways. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 740, 531–551. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Yen, M.; Lewis, R.S. Numbers count: How STIM and Orai stoichiometry affect store-operated calcium entry. Cell Calcium 2019, 79, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Berridge, M.J.; Lipp, P.; Bootman, M.D. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 1, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marchi, S.; Patergnani, S.; Missiroli, S.; Morciano, G.; Rimessi, A.; Wieckowski, M.R.; Giorgi, C.; Pinton, P. Mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis and cell death. Cell Calcium 2018, 69, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Catterall, W.A.; Perez-Reyes, E.; Snutch, T.P.; Striessnig, J. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVIII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated calcium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, Y.R.; MacKinnon, R. Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. eLife 2017, 6, e33660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monteith, G.R.; Prevarskaya, N.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J. The calcium–cancer signalling nexus. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Monteith, G.R.; Davis, F.M.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J. Calcium channels and pumps in cancer: Changes and consequences. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 31666–31673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Berridge, M.J. Calcium signalling remodelling and disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sever, R.; Brugge, J.S. Signal transduction in cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a006098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, F.; Wu, T.; Xu, Y.; Dong, Q.; Xiao, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, C.; Gao, J.; Liu, L.; et al. A comprehensive overview of oncogenic pathways in human cancer. Brief. Bioinform. 2020, 21, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giehl, K. Oncogenic Ras in tumour progression and metastasis. Biol. Chem. 2005, 386, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Divolis, G.; Mavroeidi, P.; Mavrofrydi, O.; Papazafiri, P. Differential effects of calcium on PI3K-Akt and HIF-1α survival pathways. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2016, 32, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Roderick, H.L.; Cook, S.J. Ca2+ signalling checkpoints in cancer: Remodelling Ca2+ for cancer cell proliferation and survival. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nussinov, R.; Wang, G.; Tsai, C.J.; Jang, H.; Lu, S.; Banerjee, A.; Zhang, J.; Gaponenko, V. Calmodulin and PI3K Signaling in KRAS Cancers. Trends Cancer 2017, 3, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Santella, L.; Ercolano, E.; Nusco, G.A. The cell cycle: A new entry in the field of Ca2+ signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2405–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhe, H. The emerging role of CaMKII in cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 11725–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, Z. Regulation of cell cycle progression by growth factor-induced cell signaling. Cells 2021, 10, 3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De, A. Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway: A brief overview. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2011, 43, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pataki, C.A.; Couchman, J.R.; Brábek, J. Wnt Signaling Cascades and the Roles of Syndecan Proteoglycans. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2015, 63, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bruce, J.I.E.; James, A.D. Targeting the Calcium Signalling Machinery in Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Haupt, S.; Raghu, D.; Haupt, Y. P53 calls upon CIA (Calcium Induced Apoptosis) to counter stress. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, J. The cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic functions of p53 in tumor initiation and progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a026104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sorrentino, G.; Comel, A.; del Sal, G. p53 orchestrates calcium signaling in vivo. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 1343–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bononi, A.; Bonora, M.; Marchi, S.; Missiroli, S.; Poletti, F.; Giorgi, C.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Pinton, P. Identification of PTEN at the ER and MAMs and its regulation of Ca2+ signaling and apoptosis in a protein phosphatase-dependent manner. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 1631–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bittremieux, M.; Bultynck, G. p53 and Ca2+ signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum: Partners in anti-cancer therapies. Oncoscience 2015, 2, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Madan, E.; Gogna, R.; Keppler, B.; Pati, U. p53 Increases Intra-Cellular Calcium Release by Transcriptional Regulation of Calcium Channel TRPC6 in GaQ3-Treated Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Afzal, M.; Kren, B.T.; Naveed, A.K.; Trembley, J.H.; Ahmed, K. Protein kinase CK2 impact on intracellular calcium homeostasis in prostate cancer. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 470, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Déliot, N.; Constantin, B. Plasma membrane calcium channels in cancer: Alterations and consequences for cell proliferation and migration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 2015, 1848, 2512–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Stewart, T.A.; Yapa, K.T.D.S.; Monteith, G.R. Altered calcium signaling in cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 2015, 1848, 2502–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jones, C.A.; Hazlehurst, L.A. Role of Calcium Homeostasis in Modulating EMT in Cancer. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Dejos, C.; Gkika, D.; Cantelmo, A.R. The Two-Way Relationship Between Calcium and Metabolism in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nieto, M.A.; Huang, R.Y.Y.J.; Jackson, R.A.A.; Thiery, J.P.P. EMT: 2016. Cell 2016, 166, 21–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Georgakopoulos-Soares, I.; Chartoumpekis, D.V.; Kyriazopoulou, V.; Zaravinos, A. EMT Factors and Metabolic Pathways in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bronsert, P.; Enderle-Ammour, K.; Bader, M.; Timme, S.; Kuehs, M.; Csanadi, A.; Kayser, G.; Kohler, I.; Bausch, D.; Hoeppner, J.; et al. Cancer cell invasion and EMT marker expression: A three-dimensional study of the human cancer-host interface. J. Pathol. 2014, 234, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Roche, J. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Cancers 2018, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Thiery, J.P.; Sleeman, J.P. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Weinberg, R.A. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer: Complexity and opportunities. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.J.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adiga, D.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Chakrabarty, S.; Kumar, P.; Kabekkodu, S.P. The Role of Calcium Signaling in Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cells Tissues Organs 2022, 211, 134–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lin, L.; Huang, H.; Liao, W.; Ma, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Huang, N.; Liao, Y.; Liao, W. MACC1 supports human gastric cancer growth under metabolic stress by enhancing the Warburg effect. Oncogene 2015, 34, 2700–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xia, J.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Sun, L.; Dong, S.; Huang, N.; Shi, M.; Bin, J.; Liao, Y.; Liao, W. Elevated Orai1 and STIM1 expressions upregulate MACC1 expression to promote tumor cell proliferation, metabolism, migration, and invasion in human gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016, 381, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Goto, H.; Kosako, H.; Tanabe, K.; Yanagida, M.; Sakurai, M.; Amano, M.; Kaibuchi, K.; Inagaki, M. Phosphorylation of Vimentin by Rho-Associated Kinase at a Unique Amino-Terminal Site That Is Specifically Phosphorylated during Cytokinesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 11728–11736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gross, S.; Mallu, P.; Joshi, H.; Schultz, B.; Go, C.; Soboloff, J. Ca2+ as a therapeutic target in cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 2020, 148, 233–317. [Google Scholar]
  56. Muz, B.; de la Puente, P.; Azab, F.; Azab, A.K. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia 2015, 3, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bertout, J.A.; Patel, S.A.; Simon, M.C. The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Semenza, G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors: Mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 33, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Girault, A.; Ahidouch, A.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Roles for Ca2+ and K+ channels in cancer cells exposed to the hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nielsen, N.; Lindemann, O.; Schwab, A. TRP channels and STIM/ORAI proteins: Sensors and effectors of cancer and stroma cell migration. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 5524–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chalmers, S.B.; Monteith, G.R. ORAI channels and cancer. Cell Calcium 2018, 74, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Azimi, I.; Milevskiy, M.; Chalmers, S.; Yapa, K.; Robitaille, M.; Henry, C.; Baillie, G.J.; Thompson, E.W.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; Monteith, G.R. ORAI1 and ORAI3 in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes and the Identification of ORAI3 as a Hypoxia Sensitive Gene and a Regulator of Hypoxia Responses. Cancers 2019, 11, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, X.; Wan, X.; Kan, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, F.; Feng, L.; Jin, J.; Zhang, P.; Ma, X. Hypoxia-induced upregulation of Orai1 drives colon cancer invasiveness and angiogenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 832, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Hua, D.; Yao, X.; Ma, X.; Zhang, P. Orai1 is critical for Notch-driven aggressiveness under hypoxic conditions in triple-negative breast cancers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 975–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Batra, S.; Alenfall, J. Effect of diverse categories of drugs on human colon tumour cell proliferation. Anticancer Res. 1991, 11, 1221–1224. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee, S.C.; Deutsch, C.; Beck, W.T. Comparison of ion channels in multidrug-resistant and -sensitive human leukemic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 2019–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Pancrazio, J.J.; Tabbara, I.A.; Kim, Y.I. Voltage-activated K+ conductance and cell proliferation in small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pancrazio, J.J.; Viglione, M.P.; Tabbara, I.A.; Kim, Y.I. Voltage-dependent ion channels in small-cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 5901–5906. [Google Scholar]
  69. Taylor, J.M.; Simpson, R.U. Inhibition of cancer cell growth by calcium channel antagonists in the athymic mouse. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 2413–2418. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yamashita, N.; Hamada, H.; Tsuruo, T.; Ogata, E. Enhancement of voltage-gated Na+ channel current associated with multidrug resistance in human leukemia cells. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 3736–3741. [Google Scholar]
  71. Buchanan, P.J.; McCloskey, K.D. CaV channels and cancer: Canonical functions indicate benefits of repurposed drugs as cancer therapeutics. Eur. Biophys. J. 2016, 45, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Wang, C.Y.; Lai, M.D.; Phan, N.N.; Sun, Z.; Lin, Y.C. Meta-Analysis of Public Microarray Datasets Reveals Voltage-Gated Calcium Gene Signatures in Clinical Cancer Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Pankratov, Y.; Lalo, U. Calcium permeability of ligand-gated Ca2+ channels. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 739, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Prakriya, M.; Lewis, R.S. Store-Operated Calcium Channels. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 1383–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Hofmann, T.; Obukhov, A.G.; Schaefer, M.; Harteneck, C.; Gudermann, T.; Schultz, G. Direct activation of human TRPC6 and TRPC3 channels by diacylglycerol. Nature 1999, 397, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Venkatachalam, K.; Montell, C. TRP channels. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007, 76, 387–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kellenberger, S.; Schild, L. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCI. structure, function, and pharmacology of acid-sensing ion channels and the epithelial Na+ channel. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ranade, S.S.; Syeda, R.; Patapoutian, A. Mechanically Activated Ion Channels. Neuron 2015, 87, 1162–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Hou, M.F.; Kuo, H.C.; Li, J.H.; Wang, Y.S.; Chang, C.C.; Chen, K.C.; Chen, W.C.; Chiu, C.C.; Yang, S.; Chang, W.C. Orai1/CRACM1 overexpression suppresses cell proliferation via attenuation of the store-operated calcium influx-mediated signalling pathway in A549 lung cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2011, 1810, 1278–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Flourakis, M.; Lehen’kyi, V.; Beck, B.; Raphael, M.; Vandenberghe, M.; Abeele, F.V.; Roudbaraki, M.; Lepage, G.; Mauroy, B.; Romanin, C.; et al. Orai1 contributes to the establishment of an apoptosis-resistant phenotype in prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jardin, I.; Diez-Bello, R.; Lopez, J.J.; Redondo, P.C.; Salido, G.M.; Smani, T.; Rosado, J.A. TRPC6 Channels Are Required for Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Breast Cancer Cell Lines by Modulation of Orai1 and Orai3 Surface Exposure. Cancers 2018, 10, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Yang, S.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.Y. Orai1 and STIM1 are critical for breast tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Cantonero, C.; Sanchez-Collado, J.; Gonzalez-Nunez, M.A.; Salido, G.M.; Lopez, J.J.; Jardin, I.; Rosado, J.A. Store-independent Orai1-mediated Ca2+ entry and cancer. Cell Calcium 2019, 80, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, W.; Zhang, M.; Xu, L.; Lin, D.; Cai, S.; Zou, F. The apoptosis of non-small cell lung cancer induced by cisplatin through modulation of STIM1. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2013, 65, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, J.Y.; Sun, J.; Huang, M.Y.; Wang, Y.S.; Hou, M.F.; Sun, Y.; He, H.; Krishna, N.; Chiu, S.-J.; Lin, S.; et al. STIM1 overexpression promotes colorectal cancer progression, cell motility and COX-2 expression. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4358–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Feng, B.; Liu, N.; Wu, Q.; Han, Y.; Nie, Y.; Wu, K.; Shi, Y.; Fan, D. STIM1, a direct target of microRNA-185, promotes tumor metastasis and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4808–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. saint Fleur-Lominy, S.; Maus, M.; Vaeth, M.; Lange, I.; Zee, I.; Suh, D.; Liu, C.; Wu, X.; Tikhonova, A.; Aifantis, I.; et al. STIM1 and STIM2 Mediate Cancer-Induced Inflammation in T Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 3045–3060.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, G.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, R.; Ma, W.; Yang, Y.; Wei, J.; Wei, Y. Suppression of STIM1 inhibits human glioblastoma cell proliferation and induces G0/G1 phase arrest. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 32, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Debant, M.; Burgos, M.; Hemon, P.; Buscaglia, P.; Fali, T.; Melayah, S.; Goux, N.L.; Vandier, C.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Pers, J.O.; et al. STIM1 at the plasma membrane as a new target in progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Prevarskaya, N.; Zhang, L.; Barritt, G. TRP channels in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 2007, 1772, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Shapovalov, G.; Ritaine, A.; Skryma, R.; Prevarskaya, N. Role of TRP ion channels in cancer and tumorigenesis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Canales, J.; Morales, D.; Blanco, C.; Rivas, J.; Diaz, N.; Angelopoulos, I.; Cerda, O. A TR(i)P to Cell Migration: New Roles of TRP Channels in Mechanotransduction and Cancer. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Baba, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Fujii, Y.; Mizushima, A.; Watarai, H.; Wakamori, M.; Numaga, T.; Mori, Y.; Iino, M.; Hikida, M.; et al. Coupling of STIM1 to store-operated Ca2+ entry through its constitutive and inducible movement in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16704–16709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Li, Z.; Lu, J.; Xu, P.; Xie, X.; Chen, L.; Xu, T. Mapping the interacting domains of STIM1 and Orai1 in Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 29448–29456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Stathopulos, P.B.; Zheng, L.; Li, G.Y.; Plevin, M.J.; Ikura, M. Structural and mechanistic insights into STIM1-mediated initiation of store-operated calcium entry. Cell 2008, 135, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Wu, M.M.; Buchanan, J.; Luik, R.M.; Lewis, R.S. Ca2+ store depletion causes STIM1 to accumulate in ER regions closely associated with the plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 174, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Barr, V.A.; Bernot, K.M.; Srikanth, S.; Gwack, Y.; Balagopalan, L.; Regan, C.K.; Helman, D.J.; Sommers, C.L.; Oh-Hora, M.; Rao, A.; et al. Dynamic movement of the calcium sensor STIM1 and the calcium channel Orai1 in activated T-cells: Puncta and distal caps. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 2802–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Calloway, N.; Vig, M.; Kinet, J.P.; Holowka, D.; Baird, B. Molecular clustering of STIM1 with Orai1/CRACM1 at the plasma membrane depends dynamically on depletion of Ca2+ stores and on electrostatic interactions. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Park, C.Y.; Hoover, P.J.; Mullins, F.M.; Bachhawat, P.; Covington, E.D.; Raunser, S.; Walz, T.; Garcia, K.C.; Dolmetsch, R.E.; Lewis, R.S. STIM1 clusters and activates CRAC channels via direct binding of a cytosolic domain to Orai1. Cell 2009, 136, 876–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Muik, M.; Fahrner, M.; Schindl, R.; Stathopulos, P.; Frischauf, I.; Derler, I.; Plenk, P.; Lackner, B.; Groschner, K.; Ikura, M.; et al. STIM1 couples to ORAI1 via an intramolecular transition into an extended conformation. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 1678–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Muik, M.; Frischauf, I.; Derler, I.; Fahrner, M.; Bergsmann, J.; Eder, P.; Schindl, R.; Hesch, C.; Polzinger, B.; Fritsch, R.; et al. Dynamic coupling of the putative coiled-coil domain of ORAI1 with STIM1 mediates ORAI1 channel activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 8014–8022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Yuan, J.P.; Zeng, W.; Dorwart, M.R.; Choi, Y.J.; Worley, P.F.; Muallem, S. SOAR and the polybasic STIM1 domains gate and regulate Orai channels. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Dragoni, S.; Turin, I.; Laforenza, U.; Potenza, D.M.; Bottino, C.; Glasnov, T.N.; Prestia, M.; Ferulli, F.; Saitta, A.; Mosca, A.; et al. Store-operated Ca2+ entry does not control proliferation in primary cultures of human metastatic renal cellular carcinoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 739494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Jardin, I.; Lopez, J.J.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry in Breast Cancer Cells: Remodeling and Functional Role. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Mignen, O.; Constantin, B.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Penna, A.; Gautier, M.; Gueguinou, M.; Renaudineau, Y.; Shoji, K.F.; Félix, R.; Bayet, E.; et al. Constitutive calcium entry and cancer: Updated views and insights. Eur. Biophys. J. 2017, 46, 395–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Motiani, R.K.; Hyzinski-Garcia, M.C.; Zhang, X.; Henkel, M.M.; Abdullaev, I.F.; Kuo, Y.H.; Matrougui, K.; Mongin, A.A.; Trebak, M. STIM1 and Orai1 mediate CRAC channel activity and are essential for human glioblastoma invasion. Pflug. Arch. 2013, 465, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Rosado, J.A. Introduction: Overview of the Pathophysiological Implications of Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Mammalian Cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 993, 391–395. [Google Scholar]
  108. Stanisz, H.; Saul, S.; Muller, C.S.; Kappl, R.; Niemeyer, B.A.; Vogt, T.; Hoth, M.; Roesch, A.; Bogeski, I. Inverse regulation of melanoma growth and migration by Orai1/STIM2-dependent calcium entry. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014, 27, 442–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Stanisz, H.; Vultur, A.; Herlyn, M.; Roesch, A.; Bogeski, I. The role of Orai-STIM calcium channels in melanocytes and melanoma. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 2825–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Zhang, S.L.; Yu, Y.; Roos, J.; Kozak, J.A.; Deerinck, T.J.; Ellisman, M.H.; Stauderman, K.A.; Cahalan, M.D. STIM1 is a Ca2+ sensor that activates CRAC channels and migrates from the Ca2+ store to the plasma membrane. Nature 2005, 437, 902–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Berna-Erro, A.; Jardin, I.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Role of STIM2 in cell function and physiopathology. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 3111–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Butorac, C.; Krizova, A.; Derler, I. Review: Structure and Activation Mechanisms of CRAC Channels. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1131, 547–604. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Derler, I.; Jardin, I.; Romanin, C. Molecular mechanisms of STIM/Orai communication. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016, 310, C643–C662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Krizova, A.; Maltan, L.; Derler, I. Critical parameters maintaining authentic CRAC channel hallmarks. Eur. Biophys. J. 2019, 48, 425–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Parekh, A.B.; Putney, J.W., Jr. Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85, 757–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Yeung, P.S.; Prakriya, M. The exquisitely cooperative nature of Orai1 channel activation. J. Gen. Physiol. 2018, 150, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yeung, P.S.; Yamashita, M.; Prakriya, M. Molecular basis of allosteric Orai1 channel activation by STIM1. J. Physiol. 2019, 598, 1707–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liou, J. STIM is a Ca2+ sensor essential for Ca2+-store-depletion-triggered Ca2+ influx. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hou, X.; Pedi, L.; Diver, M.M.; Long, S.B. Crystal structure of the calcium release-activated calcium channel Orai. Science 2012, 338, 1308–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Prakriya, M.; Feske, S.; Gwack, Y.; Srikanth, S.; Rao, A.; Hogan, P.G. Orai1 is an essential pore subunit of the CRAC channel. Nature 2006, 443, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Feske, S.; Gwack, Y.; Prakriya, M.; Srikanth, S.; Puppel, S.H.; Tanasa, B.; Hogan, P.G.; Lewis, R.S.; Daly, M.; Rao, A. A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function. Nature 2006, 441, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Berna-Erro, A.; Braun, A.; Kraft, R.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Schuhmann, M.K.; Stegner, D.; Wultsch, T.; Eilers, J.; Meuth, S.G.; Stoll, G.; et al. STIM2 regulates capacitive Ca2+ entry in neurons and plays a key role in hypoxic neuronal cell death. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Kraft, R. STIM and ORAI proteins in the nervous system. Channels 2015, 9, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Williams, R.T.; Manji, S.S.; Parker, N.J.; Hancock, M.S.; van Stekelenburg, L.; Eid, J.P.; Senior, P.V.; Kazenwadel, J.S.; Shandala, T.; Saint, R.; et al. Identification and characterization of the STIM (stromal interaction molecule) gene family: Coding for a novel class of transmembrane proteins. Biochem. J. 2001, 357 Pt 3, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Vashisht, A.; Tanwar, J.; Motiani, R.K. Regulation of proto-oncogene Orai3 by miR18a/b and miR34a. Cell Calcium 2018, 75, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Motiani, R.K.; Abdullaev, I.F.; Trebak, M. A novel native store-operated calcium channel encoded by Orai3: Selective requirement of Orai3 versus Orai1 in estrogen receptor-positive versus estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 19173–19183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Motiani, R.K.; Zhang, X.; Harmon, K.E.; Keller, R.S.; Matrougui, K.; Bennett, J.A.; Trebak, M. Orai3 is an estrogen receptor alpha-regulated Ca2+ channel that promotes tumorigenesis. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Soboloff, J.; Spassova, M.A.; Hewavitharana, T.; He, L.P.; Xu, W.; Johnstone, L.S.; Dziadek, M.A.; Gill, D.L. STIM2 is an inhibitor of STIM1-mediated store-operated Ca2+ Entry. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, 1465–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Miederer, A.M.; Alansary, D.; Schwar, G.; Lee, P.H.; Jung, M.; Helms, V.; Niemeyer, B.A. A STIM2 splice variant negatively regulates store-operated calcium entry. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Rana, A.; Yen, M.; Sadaghiani, A.M.; Malmersjo, S.; Park, C.Y.; Dolmetsch, R.E.; Lewis, R.S. Alternative splicing converts STIM2 from an activator to an inhibitor of store-operated calcium channels. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 209, 653–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Rosado, J.A.; Diez, R.; Smani, T.; Jardin, I. STIM and Orai1 Variants in Store-Operated Calcium Entry. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Ramesh, G.; Jarzembowski, L.; Schwarz, Y.; Poth, V.; Konrad, M.; Knapp, M.L.; Schwär, G.; Lauer, A.A.; Grimm, M.O.W.; Alansary, D.; et al. A short isoform of STIM1 confers frequency-dependent synaptic enhancement. Cell Rep. 2021, 34, 108844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Brandman, O.; Liou, J.; Park, W.S.; Meyer, T. STIM2 is a feedback regulator that stabilizes basal cytosolic and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ levels. Cell 2007, 131, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Subedi, K.P.; Ong, H.L.; Son, G.Y.; Liu, X.; Ambudkar, I.S. STIM2 Induces Activated Conformation of STIM1 to Control Orai1 Function in ER-PM Junctions. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 522–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Wissenbach, U.; Philipp, S.E.; Gross, S.A.; Cavalie, A.; Flockerzi, V. Primary structure, chromosomal localization and expression in immune cells of the murine ORAI and STIM genes. Cell Calcium 2007, 42, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Derler, I.; Plenk, P.; Fahrner, M.; Muik, M.; Jardin, I.; Schindl, R.; Gruber, H.J.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. The extended transmembrane Orai1 N-terminal (ETON) region combines binding interface and gate for Orai1 activation by STIM1. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 29025–29034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. McNally, B.A.; Somasundaram, A.; Jairaman, A.; Yamashita, M.; Prakriya, M. The C- and N-terminal STIM1 binding sites on Orai1 are required for both trapping and gating CRAC channels. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 2833–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Palty, R.; Stanley, C.; Isacoff, E.Y. Critical role for Orai1 C-terminal domain and TM4 in CRAC channel gating. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 963–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Stathopulos, P.B.; Zheng, L.; Ikura, M. Stromal interaction molecule (STIM) 1 and STIM2 calcium sensing regions exhibit distinct unfolding and oligomerization kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Hirve, N.; Rajanikanth, V.; Hogan, P.G.; Gudlur, A. Coiled-Coil Formation Conveys a STIM1 Signal from ER Lumen to Cytoplasm. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Gudlur, A.; Zeraik, A.E.; Hirve, N.; Rajanikanth, V.; Bobkov, A.A.; Ma, G.; Zheng, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Komives, E.A.; et al. Calcium sensing by the STIM1 ER-luminal domain. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Ma, G.; Wei, M.; He, L.; Liu, C.; Wu, B.; Zhang, S.L.; Jing, J.; Liang, X.; Senes, A.; Tan, P.; et al. Inside-out Ca2+ signalling prompted by STIM1 conformational switch. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Sallinger, M.; Tiffner, A.; Schmidt, T.; Bonhenry, D.; Waldherr, L.; Frischauf, I.; Lunz, I.; Derler, I.; Schober, R.; Schindl, R. Luminal STIM1 mutants that cause tubular aggregate myopathy promote autophagic processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Schober, R.; Bonhenry, D.; Lunz, V.; Zhu, J.; Krizova, A.; Frischauf, I.; Fahrner, M.; Zhang, M.; Waldherr, L.; Schmidt, T.; et al. Sequential activation of STIM1 links Ca2+ with luminal domain unfolding. Sci. Signal. 2019, 12, eaax3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Mullins, F.M.; Lewis, R.S. The inactivation domain of STIM1 is functionally coupled with the Orai1 pore to enable Ca2+-dependent inactivation. J. Gen. Physiol. 2016, 147, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Derler, I.; Fahrner, M.; Muik, M.; Lackner, B.; Schindl, R.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. A Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) modulatory domain (CMD) within STIM1 mediates fast Ca2(+)-dependent inactivation of ORAI1 channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24933–24938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Hewavitharana, T.; Deng, X.; Soboloff, J.; Gill, D.L. Role of STIM and Orai proteins in the store-operated calcium signaling pathway. Cell Calcium 2007, 42, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hogan, P.G.; Lewis, R.S.; Rao, A. Molecular basis of calcium signaling in lymphocytes: STIM and ORAI. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 28, 491–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Rathner, P.; Fahrner, M.; Cerofolini, L.; Grabmayr, H.; Horvath, F.; Krobath, H.; Gupta, A.; Ravera, E.; Fragai, M.; Bechmann, M.; et al. Interhelical interactions within the STIM1 CC1 domain modulate CRAC channel activation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2021, 17, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. van Dorp, S.; Qiu, R.; Choi, U.B.; Wu, M.M.; Yen, M.; Kirmiz, M.; Brunger, A.T.; Lewis, R.S. Conformational dynamics of auto-inhibition in the ER calcium sensor STIM1. eLife 2021, 10, e66194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Grabmayr, H.; Romanin, C.; Fahrner, M. STIM Proteins: An Ever-Expanding Family. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Cui, B.; Yang, X.; Li, S.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Z.; Dong, C.; Shen, Y. The inhibitory helix controls the intramolecular conformational switching of the C-terminus of STIM1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Ma, G.; He, L.; Liu, S.; Xie, J.; Huang, Z.; Jing, J.; Lee, Y.-T.; Wang, R.; Luo, H.; Han, W.; et al. Optogenetic engineering to probe the molecular choreography of STIM1-mediated cell signaling. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Muik, M.; Fahrner, M.; Derler, I.; Schindl, R.; Bergsmann, J.; Frischauf, I.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. A Cytosolic Homomerization and a Modulatory Domain within STIM1 C Terminus Determine Coupling to ORAI1 Channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 8421–8426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Kawasaki, T.; Lange, I.; Feske, S. A minimal regulatory domain in the C terminus of STIM1 binds to and activates ORAI1 CRAC channels. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 385, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Stathopulos, P.B.; Schindl, R.; Fahrner, M.; Zheng, L.; Gasmi-Seabrook, G.M.; Muik, M.; Romanin, C.; Ikura, M. STIM1/Orai1 coiled-coil interplay in the regulation of store-operated calcium entry. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Yang, X.; Jin, H.; Cai, X.; Li, S.; Shen, Y. Structural and mechanistic insights into the activation of Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 5657–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Höglinger, C.; Grabmayr, H.; Maltan, L.; Horvath, F.; Krobath, H.; Muik, M.; Tiffner, A.; Renger, T.; Romanin, C.; Fahrner, M.; et al. Defects in the STIM1 SOARα2 domain affect multiple steps in the CRAC channel activation cascade. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 6645–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Frischauf, I.; Muik, M.; Derler, I.; Bergsmann, J.; Fahrner, M.; Schindl, R.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. Molecular determinants of the coupling between STIM1 and Orai channels: Differential activation of Orai1-3 channels by a STIM1 coiled-coil mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21696–21706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Vig, M.; Peinelt, C.; Beck, A.; Koomoa, D.L.; Rabah, D.; Koblan-Huberson, M.; Kraft, S.; Turner, H.; Fleig, A.; Penner, R.; et al. CRACM1 is a plasma membrane protein essential for store-operated Ca2+ entry. Science 2006, 312, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Gross, S.A.; Wissenbach, U.; Philipp, S.E.; Freichel, M.; Cavalie, A.; Flockerzi, V. Murine ORAI2 splice variants form functional Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 19375–19384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Gwack, Y.; Srikanth, S.; Feske, S.; Cruz-Guilloty, F.; Oh-Hora, M.; Neems, D.S.; Hogan, P.G.; Rao, A. Biochemical and functional characterization of Orai proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16232–16243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Dziadek, M.A.; Johnstone, L.S. Biochemical properties and cellular localisation of STIM proteins. Cell Calcium 2007, 42, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Shuttleworth, T.J. Orai3—The ‘exceptional’ Orai? J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Ji, W.; Xu, P.; Li, Z.; Lu, J.; Liu, L.; Zhan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hille, B.; Xu, T.; Chen, L. Functional stoichiometry of the unitary calcium-release-activated calcium channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13668–13673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Mignen, O.; Thompson, J.L.; Shuttleworth, T.J. Orai1 subunit stoichiometry of the mammalian CRAC channel pore. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Penna, A.; Demuro, A.; Yeromin, A.V.; Zhang, S.L.; Safrina, O.; Parker, I.; Cahalan, M.D. The CRAC channel consists of a tetramer formed by Stim-induced dimerization of Orai dimers. Nature 2008, 456, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Srikanth, S.; Yee, M.K.W.; Gwack, Y.; Ribalet, B. The third transmembrane segment of Orai1 protein modulates Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel gating and permeation properties. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35318–35328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fahrner, M.; Pandey, S.K.; Muik, M.; Traxler, L.; Butorac, C.; Stadlbauer, M.; Zayats, V.; Krizova, A.; Plenk, P.; Frischauf, I.; et al. Communication between N terminus and loop2 tunes Orai activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 1271–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Zhou, Y.; Cai, X.; Loktionova, N.A.; Wang, X.; Nwokonko, R.M.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Rothberg, B.S.; Trebak, M.; Gill, D.L. The STIM1-binding site nexus remotely controls Orai1 channel gating. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Baraniak, J.H.; Zhou, Y.; Nwokonko, R.M.; Jennette, M.R.; Kazzaz, S.A.; Stenson, J.M.; Whitsell, A.L.; Wang, Y.; Trebak, M.; Gill, D.L. Orai channel C-terminal peptides are key modulators of STIM-Orai coupling and calcium signal generation. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 109322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Yen, M.; Lokteva, L.A.; Lewis, R.S. Functional Analysis of Orai1 Concatemers Supports a Hexameric Stoichiometry for the CRAC Channel. Biophys. J. 2016, 111, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Korzeniowski, M.K.; Manjarrés, I.M.; Varnai, P.; Balla, T. Activation of STIM1-Orai1 Involves an Intramolecular Switching Mechanism. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Butorac, C.; Muik, M.; Derler, I.; Stadlbauer, M.; Lunz, V.; Krizova, A.; Lindinger, S.; Schober, R.; Frischauf, I.; Bhardwaj, R.; et al. A novel STIM1-Orai1 gating interface essential for CRAC channel activation. Cell Calcium 2019, 79, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Derler, I.; Schindl, R.; Fritsch, R.; Romanin, C. Gating and permeation of Orai channels. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed. 2012, 17, 1304–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Frischauf, I.; Schindl, R.; Bergsmann, J.; Derler, I.; Fahrner, M.; Muik, M.; Fritsch, R.; Lackner, B.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. Cooperativeness of Orai cytosolic domains tunes subtype-specific gating. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 8577–8584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Hou, X.; Burstein, S.R.; Long, S. Structures reveal opening of the store-operated calcium channel Orai. bioRxiv 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hou, X.; Outhwaite, I.R.; Pedi, L.; Long, S.B. Cryo-EM structure of the calcium release-activated calcium channel Orai in an open conformation. eLife 2020, 9, e62772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Liu, X.; Wu, G.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X.; Ji, R.; Lu, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Shen, Y. Molecular understanding of calcium permeation through the open Orai channel. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tiffner, A.; Maltan, L.; Weiß, S.; Derler, I. The orai pore opening mechanism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yeung, P.S.W.; Yamashita, M.; Ing, C.E.; Pomès, R.; Freymann, D.M.; Prakriya, M. Mapping the functional anatomy of Orai1 transmembrane domains for CRAC channel gating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E5193–E5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Tiffner, A.; Schober, R.; Höglinger, C.; Bonhenry, D.; Pandey, S.; Lunz, V.; Sallinger, M.; Frischauf, I.; Fahrner, M.; Lindinger, S.; et al. CRAC channel opening is determined by a series of Orai1 gating checkpoints in the transmembrane and cytosolic regions. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Takahashi, Y.; Murakami, M.; Watanabe, H.; Hasegawa, H.; Ohba, T.; Munehisa, Y.; Nobori, K.; Ono, K.; Iijima, T.; Ito, H. Essential role of the N-terminus of murine Orai1 in store-operated Ca2+ entry. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 356, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Bergsmann, J.; Derler, I.; Muik, M.; Frischauf, I.; Fahrner, M.; Pollheimer, P.; Schwarzinger, C.; Gruber, H.J.; Groschner, K.; Romanin, C. Molecular Determinants within N Terminus of Orai3 Protein That Control Channel Activation and Gating. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31565–31575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Tiffner, A.; Derler, I. Isoform-specific properties of orai homologues in activation, downstream signaling, physiology and pathophysiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Tiffner, A.; Maltan, L.; Fahrner, M.; Sallinger, M.; Weiß, S.; Grabmayr, H.; Höglinger, C.; Derler, I. Transmembrane Domain 3 (TM3) Governs Orai1 and Orai3 Pore Opening in an Isoform-Specific Manner. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 635705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Maltan, L.; Andova, A.M.; Derler, I. The Role of Lipids in CRAC Channel Function. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Hogan, P.G. The STIM1-ORAI1 microdomain. Cell Calcium 2015, 58, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Cao, X.; Choi, S.; Maleth, J.J.; Park, S.; Ahuja, M.; Muallem, S. The ER/PM microdomain, PI(4,5)P(2) and the regulation of STIM1-Orai1 channel function. Cell Calcium 2015, 58, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Zhou, Y.; Ramachandran, S.; Oh-Hora, M.; Rao, A.; Hogan, P.G. Pore architecture of the ORAI1 store-operated calcium channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4896–4901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Deng, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Soboloff, J.; Gill, D.L. STIM and orai: Dynamic intermembrane coupling to control cellular calcium signals. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 22501–22505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Balla, T. Ca2+ and lipid signals hold hands at endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contact sites. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 2709–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Gwozdz, T.; Dutko-Gwozdz, J.; Schafer, C.; Bolotina, V.M. Overexpression of Orai1 and STIM1 proteins alters regulation of store-operated Ca2+ entry by endogenous mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 22865–22872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Derler, I.; Jardin, I.; Stathopulos, P.B.; Muik, M.; Fahrner, M.; Zayats, V.; Pandey, S.K.; Poteser, M.; Lacker, B.; Absolonova, M.; et al. Cholesterol modulates Orai1 channel function. Sci. Signal. 2016, 9, ra10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Pacheco, J.; Dominguez, L.; Bohorquez-Hernandez, A.; Asanov, A.; Vaca, L. A cholesterol-binding domain in STIM1 modulates STIM1-Orai1 physical and functional interactions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Bohorquez-Hernandez, A.; Gratton, E.; Pacheco, J.; Asanov, A.; Vaca, L. Cholesterol modulates the cellular localization of Orai1 channels and its disposition among membrane domains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 1481–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Carreras-Sureda, A.; Abrami, L.; Ji-Hee, K.; Wang, W.A.; Henry, C.; Frieden, M.; Didier, M.; van der Goot, F.G.; Demaurex, N. S-acylation by ZDHHC20 targets ORAI1 channels to lipid rafts for efficient Ca2+ signaling by Jurkat T cell receptors at the immune synapse. eLife 2021, 10, e72051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Heo, W.D.; Inoue, T.; Park, W.S.; Kim, M.L.; Park, B.O.; Wandless, T.J.; Meyer, T. PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(4,5)P2 lipids target proteins with polybasic clusters to the plasma membrane. Science 2006, 314, 1458–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Liou, J.; Fivaz, M.; Inoue, T.; Meyer, T. Live-cell imaging reveals sequential oligomerization and local plasma membrane targeting of stromal interaction molecule 1 after Ca2+ store depletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9301–9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Ercan, E.; Momburg, F.; Engel, U.; Temmerman, K.; Nickel, W.; Seedorf, M. A conserved, lipid-mediated sorting mechanism of yeast Ist2 and mammalian STIM proteins to the peripheral ER. Traffic 2009, 10, 1802–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Collins, S.R.; Meyer, T. Evolutionary origins of STIM1 and STIM2 within ancient Ca2+ signaling systems. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Chvanov, M.; Walsh, C.M.; Haynes, L.P.; Voronina, S.G.; Lur, G.; Gerasimenko, O.V.; Barraclough, R.; Rudland, P.S.; Petersen, O.H.; Burgoyne, R.D.; et al. ATP depletion induces translocation of STIM1 to puncta and formation of STIM1-ORAI1 clusters: Translocation and re-translocation of STIM1 does not require ATP. Pflug. Arch. 2008, 457, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Korzeniowski, M.K.; Popovic, M.A.; Szentpetery, Z.; Varnai, P.; Stojilkovic, S.S.; Balla, T. Dependence of STIM1/Orai1-mediated calcium entry on plasma membrane phosphoinositides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21027–21035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Walsh, C.M.; Doherty, M.K.; Tepikin, A.V.; Burgoyne, R.D. Evidence for an interaction between Golli and STIM1 in store-operated calcium entry. Biochem. J. 2010, 430, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Maleth, J.; Choi, S.; Muallem, S.; Ahuja, M. Translocation between PI(4,5)P2-poor and PI(4,5)P2-rich microdomains during store depletion determines STIM1 conformation and Orai1 gating. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Wu, M.M.; Covington, E.D.; Lewis, R.S. Single-molecule analysis of diffusion and trapping of STIM1 and Orai1 at endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 3672–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Calloway, N.; Owens, T.; Corwith, K.; Rodgers, W.; Holowka, D.; Baird, B. Stimulated association of STIM1 and Orai1 is regulated by the balance of PtdIns(4,5)P(2) between distinct membrane pools. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124 Pt 15, 2602–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Rosado, J.A.; Sage, S.O. Phosphoinositides are required for store-mediated calcium entry in human platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 9110–9113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Broad, L.M.; Braun, F.J.; Lievremont, J.P.; Bird, G.S.; Kurosaki, T.; Putney, J.W., Jr. Role of the phospholipase C-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate pathway in calcium release-activated calcium current and capacitative calcium entry. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 15945–15952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Li, H.; Papadopoulos, V. Peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor function in cholesterol transport. Identification of a putative cholesterol recognition/interaction amino acid sequence and consensus pattern. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 4991–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Epand, R.M. Cholesterol and the interaction of proteins with membrane domains. Prog. Lipid Res. 2006, 45, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Epand, R.M. Proteins and cholesterol-rich domains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 2008, 1778, 1576–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Fantini, J.; Barrantes, F. How cholesterol interacts with membrane proteins: An exploration of cholesterol-binding sites including CRAC, CARC, and tilted domains. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Galan, C.; Woodard, G.E.; Dionisio, N.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Lipid rafts modulate the activation but not the maintenance of store-operated Ca2+ entry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2010, 1803, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Combs, D.J.; Lu, Z. Sphingomyelinase D inhibits store-operated Ca2+ entry in T lymphocytes by suppressing ORAI current. J. Gen. Physiol. 2015, 146, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Hogan, P.G. Sphingomyelin, ORAI1 channels, and cellular Ca2+ signaling. J. Gen. Physiol. 2015, 146, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Kodakandla, G.; West, S.J.; Wang, Q.; Tewari, R.; Zhu, M.X.; Akimzhanov, A.M.; Boehning, D. Dynamic S-acylation of the ER-resident protein stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) is required for store-operated Ca2+ entry. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Son, A.; Park, S.; Shin, D.M.; Muallem, S. Orai1 and STIM1 in ER/PM junctions: Roles in pancreatic cell function and dysfunction. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016, 310, C414–C422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Giordano, F.; Saheki, Y.; Idevall-Hagren, O.; Colombo, S.F.; Pirruccello, M.; Milosevic, I.; Gracheva, E.O.; Bagriantsev, S.N.; Borgese, N.; De Camilli, P. PI(4,5)P(2)-dependent and Ca2+-regulated ER-PM interactions mediated by the extended synaptotagmins. Cell 2013, 153, 1494–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Besprozvannaya, M.; Dickson, E.; Li, H.; Ginburg, K.S.; Bers, D.M.; Auwerx, J.; Nunnari, J. GRAM domain proteins specialize functionally distinct ER-PM contact sites in human cells. eLife 2018, 7, e31019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Jha, A.; Chung, W.Y.; Vachel, L.; Maleth, J.; Lake, S.; Zhang, G.; Ahuja, M.; Muallem, S. Anoctamin 8 tethers endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane for assembly of Ca2+ signaling complexes at the ER/PM compartment. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Sharma, S.; Quintana, A.; Findlay, G.M.; Mettlen, M.; Baust, B.; Jain, M.; Nilsson, R.; Rao, A.; Hogan, P.G. An siRNA screen for NFAT activation identifies septins as coordinators of store-operated Ca2+ entry. Nature 2013, 499, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Deb, B.K.; Hasan, G. Regulation of Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry by Septins. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Katz, Z.B.; Zhang, C.; Quintana, A.; Lillemeier, B.F.; Hogan, P.G. Septins organize endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions for STIM1-ORAI1 calcium signalling. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Deb, B.K.; Pathak, T.; Hasan, G. Store-independent modulation of Ca2+ entry through Orai by Septin 7. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Deb, B.K.; Chakraborty, P.; Gopurappilly, R.; Hasan, G. SEPT7 regulates Ca2+ entry through Orai channels in human neural progenitor cells and neurons. Cell Calcium 2020, 90, 102252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. De Souza, L.B.; Ong, H.L.; Liu, X.; Ambudkar, I.S. PIP2 and septin control STIM1/Orai1 assembly by regulating cytoskeletal remodeling via a CDC42-WASP/WAVE-ARP2/3 protein complex. Cell Calcium 2021, 99, 102475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Srikanth, S.; Jew, M.; Kim, K.D.; Yee, M.K.; Abramson, J.; Gwack, Y. Junctate is a Ca2+-sensing structural component of Orai1 and stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8682–8687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Woo, J.S.; Srikanth, S.; Nishi, M.; Ping, P.; Takeshima, H.; Gwack, Y. Junctophilin-4, a component of the endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions, regulates Ca2+ dynamics in T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2762–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Jing, J.; He, L.; Sun, A.; Quintana, A.; Ding, Y.; Ma, G.; Tan, P.; Liang, X.; Zheng, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Proteomic mapping of ER-PM junctions identifies STIMATE as a regulator of Ca2+ influx. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Jha, A.; Ahuja, M.; Maleth, J.; Moreno, C.M.; Yuan, J.P.; Kim, M.S.; Muallem, S. The STIM1 CTID domain determines access of SARAF to SOAR to regulate Orai1 channel function. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 202, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  232. Palty, R.; Raveh, A.; Kaminsky, I.; Meller, R.; Reuveny, E. SARAF inactivates the store operated calcium entry machinery to prevent excess calcium refilling. Cell 2012, 149, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  233. Yu, F.; Sun, L.; Machaca, K. Constitutive recycling of the store-operated Ca2+ channel Orai1 and its internalization during meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Jiao, H.X.; Mu, Y.P.; Gui, L.X.; Yan, F.R.; Lin, D.C.; Sham, J.S.; Lin, M.J. Increase in caveolae and caveolin-1 expression modulates agonist-induced contraction and store- and receptor-operated Ca2+ entry in pulmonary arteries of pulmonary hypertensive rats. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2016, 84, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Zhu, H.; Weisleder, N.; Wu, P.; Cai, C.; Chen, J.W. Caveolae/caveolin-1 are important modulators of store-operated calcium entry in Hs578/T breast cancer cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2008, 106, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Yeh, Y.C.; Parekh, A.B. Distinct structural domains of caveolin-1 independently regulate Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channels and Ca2+ microdomain-dependent gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  237. Pani, B.; Ong, H.L.; Liu, X.; Rauser, K.; Ambudkar, I.S.; Singh, B.B. Lipid Rafts Determine Clustering of STIM1 in Endoplasmic Reticulum-Plasma Membrane Junctions and Regulation of Store-operated Ca2+ Entry (SOCE). J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 17333–17340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Alicia, S.; Angélica, Z.; Carlos, S.; Alfonso, S.; Vaca, L. STIM1 converts TRPC1 from a receptor-operated to a store-operated channel: Moving TRPC1 in and out of lipid rafts. Cell Calcium 2008, 44, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Lockwich, T.P.; Liu, X.; Singh, B.B.; Jadlowiec, J.; Weiland, S.; Ambudkar, I.S. Assembly of Trp1 in a Signaling Complex Associated with Caveolin-Scaffolding Lipid Raft Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11934–11942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Rathor, N.; Chung, H.K.; Wang, S.R.; Wang, J.Y.; Turner, D.J.; Rao, J.N. Caveolin-1 enhances rapid mucosal restitution by activating TRPC1-mediated Ca2+ signaling. Physiol. Rep. 2014, 2, e12193. [Google Scholar]
  241. Murata, T.; Lin, M.I.; Stan, R.V.; Bauer, P.M.; Yu, J.; Sessa, W.C. Genetic Evidence Supporting Caveolae Microdomain Regulation of Calcium Entry in Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16631–16643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  242. Prakash, Y.S.; Thompson, M.A.; Vaa, B.; Matabdin, I.; Peterson, T.E.; He, T.; Pabelick, C.M. Caveolins and intracellular calcium regulation in human airway smooth muscle. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2007, 293, L1118–L1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  243. Pani, B.; Ong, H.L.; Brazer, S.C.; Liu, X.; Rauser, K.; Singh, B.B.; Ambudkar, I.S. Activation of TRPC1 by STIM1 in ER-PM microdomains involves release of the channel from its scaffold caveolin-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20087–20092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Vaeth, M.; Kahlfuss, S.; Feske, S. CRAC Channels and Calcium Signaling in T Cell-Mediated Immunity. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 878–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Diez-Bello, R.; Jardin, I.; Salido, G.M.; Rosado, J.A. Orai1 and Orai2 mediate store-operated calcium entry that regulates HL60 cell migration and FAK phosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Tanwar, J.; Arora, S.; Motiani, R.K. Orai3: Oncochannel with therapeutic potential. Cell Calcium 2020, 90, 102247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Chen, Y.T.; Chen, Y.F.; Chiu, W.T.; Liu, K.Y.; Liu, Y.L.; Chang, J.Y.; Chang, H.C.; Shen, M.R. Microtubule-associated histone deacetylase 6 supports the calcium store sensor STIM1 in mediating malignant cell behaviors. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 4500–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Chen, Y.F.; Chiu, W.T.; Chen, Y.T.; Lin, P.Y.; Huang, H.J.; Chou, C.Y.; Chang, H.C.; Tang, M.J.; Shen, M.R. Calcium store sensor stromal-interaction molecule 1-dependent signaling plays an important role in cervical cancer growth, migration, and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15225–15230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Ay, A.S.; Benzerdjerb, N.; Sevestre, H.; Ahidouch, A.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Orai3 Constitutes a Native Store-Operated Calcium Entry That Regulates Non Small Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. McAndrew, D.; Grice, D.M.; Peters, A.A.; Davis, F.M.; Stewart, T.; Rice, M.; Smart, C.E.; Brown, M.A.; Kenny, P.A.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; et al. ORAI1-Mediated Calcium Influx in Lactation and in Breast Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Tang, B.D.; Xia, X.; Lv, X.F.; Yu, B.X.; Yuan, J.N.; Mai, X.Y.; Shang, J.Y.; Zhou, J.G.; Liang, S.J.; Pang, R.P. Inhibition of Orai1-mediated Ca 2+ entry enhances chemosensitivity of HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells to 5-fluorouracil. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Faouzi, M.; Kischel, P.; Hague, F.; Ahidouch, A.; Benzerdjeb, N.; Sevestre, H.; Penner, R.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. ORAI3 silencing alters cell proliferation and cell cycle progression via c-myc pathway in breast cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2013, 1833, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Faouzi, M.; Hague, F.; Potier, M.; Ahidouch, A.; Sevestre, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Down-regulation of Orai3 arrests cell-cycle progression and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells but not in normal breast epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Sobradillo, D.; Hernández-Morales, M.; Ubierna, D.; Moyer, M.P.; Núñez, L.; Villalobos, C. A Reciprocal Shift in Transient Receptor Potential Channel 1 (TRPC1) and Stromal Interaction Molecule 2 (STIM2) Contributes to Ca2+ Remodeling and Cancer Hallmarks in Colorectal Carcinoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 28765–28782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  255. Zhu, H.; Zhang, H.; Jin, F.; Fang, M.; Huang, M.; Yang, C.S.; Chen, T.; Fu, L.; Pan, Z. Elevated Orai1 expression mediates tumor-promoting intracellular Ca2+ oscillations in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 3455–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Liu, H.; Hughes, J.D.; Rollins, S.; Chen, B.; Perkins, E. Calcium entry via ORAI1 regulates glioblastoma cell proliferation and apoptosis. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2011, 91, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Yang, N.; Tang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Xu, D.; Shen, Y.; Sun, S.; Yang, G. Blockade of store-operated Ca2+ entry inhibits hepatocarcinoma cell migration and invasion by regulating focal adhesion turnover. Cancer Lett. 2013, 330, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. El Boustany, C.; Bidaux, G.; Enfissi, A.; Delcourt, P.; Prevarskaya, N.; Capiod, T. Capacitative calcium entry and transient receptor potential canonical 6 expression control human hepatoma cell proliferation. Hepatology 2008, 47, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Benzerdjeb, N.; Sevestre, H.; Ahidouch, A.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Orai3 is a predictive marker of metastasis and survival in resectable lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81588–81597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Duffy, S.M.; Ashmole, I.; Smallwood, D.T.; Leyland, M.L.; Bradding, P. Orai/CRACM1 and KCa3.1 ion channels interact in the human lung mast cell plasma membrane. Cell Commun. Signal. 2015, 13, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  261. Wang, W.; Ren, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, W.; Dong, X.; Pan, J.; Gao, H.; Tian, Y. Orai1 and Stim1 Mediate the Majority of Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Multiple Myeloma and Have Strong Implications for Adverse Prognosis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 48, 2273–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Yanamandra, N.; Buzzeo, R.W.; Gabriel, M.; Hazlehurst, L.A.; Mari, Y.; Beaupre, D.M.; Cuevas, J. Tipifarnib-Induced Apoptosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Multiple Myeloma Cells Depends on Ca2+ Influx through Plasma Membrane Ca2+ Channels. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  263. Zeng, B.; Yuan, C.; Yang, X.L.; Atkin, S.; Xu, S.Z. TRPC Channels and Their Splice Variants Are Essential for Promoting Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation and Tumorigenesis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2012, 13, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Schmidt, S.; Liu, G.; Liu, G.; Yang, W.; Honisch, S.; Pantelakos, S.; Stournaras, C.; Hönig, A.; Lang, F. Enhanced Orai1 and STIM1 expression as well as store operated Ca2+ entry in therapy resistant ovary carcinoma cells. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 4799–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  265. Kondratska, K.; Kondratskyi, A.; Yassine, M.; Lemonnier, L.; Lepage, G.; Morabito, A.; Skryma, R.; Prevarskaya, N. Orai1 and STIM1 mediate SOCE and contribute to apoptotic resistance of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2014, 1843, 2263–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Dubois, C.; Kondratska, K.; Kondratskyi, A.; Morabito, A.; Mesilmany, L.; Farfariello, V.; Toillon, R.A.; Gelus, N.Z.; Laurenge, E.; van den Abeele, F.; et al. ORAI3 silencing alters cell proliferation and promotes mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Res. 2021, 1868, 119023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Holzmann, C.; Kilch, T.; Kappel, S.; Armbruster, A.; Jung, V.; Stockle, M.; Bogeski, I.; Schwarz, E.C.; Peinelt, C. ICRAC controls the rapid androgen response in human primary prostate epithelial cells and is altered in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2013, 4, 2096–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Perrouin Verbe, M.A.; Bruyere, F.; Rozet, F.; Vandier, C.; Fromont, G. Expression of store-operated channel components in prostate cancer: The prognostic paradox. Hum. Pathol. 2016, 49, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Dubois, C.; van den Abeele, F.; Lehen’kyi, V.; Gkika, D.; Guarmit, B.; Lepage, G.; Slomianny, C.; Borowiec, A.S.; Bidaux, G.; Benahmed, M.; et al. Remodeling of channel-forming ORAI proteins determines an oncogenic switch in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Kappel, S.; Marques, I.J.; Zoni, E.; Stoklosa, P.; Peinelt, C.; Mercader, N.; Kruithof-de Julio, M.; Borgström, A. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry as a Prostate Cancer Biomarker—A Riddle with Perspectives. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2017, 3, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  271. Hasna, J.; Hague, F.; Rodat-Despoix, L.; Geerts, D.; Leroy, C.; Tulasne, D.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H.; Kischel, P. Orai3 calcium channel and resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer cells: The p53 connection. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 693–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Zhu, M.; Chen, L.; Zhao, P.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, C.; Yu, S.; Lin, Y.; Yang, X. Store-operated Ca2+ entry regulates glioma cell migration and invasion via modulation of Pyk2 phosphorylation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 33, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  273. Makena, M.R.; Ko, M.; Dang, D.K.; Rao, R. Epigenetic Modulation of SPCA2 Reverses Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Chen, Y.W.; Chen, Y.F.; Chen, Y.T.; Chiu, W.T.; Shen, M.R. The STIM1-Orai1 pathway of store-operated Ca2+ entry controls the checkpoint in cell cycle G1/S transition. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  275. Zhu, D.; He, R.; Yu, W.; Li, C.; Cheng, H.; Zhu, B.; Yan, J. ORAI3 contributes to hypoxia-inducible factor 1/2α-sensitive colon cell migration. Physiol. Int. 2021, 108, 221–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Umemura, M.; Baljinnyam, E.; Feske, S.; de Lorenzo, M.S.; Xie, L.H.; Feng, X.; Oda, K.; Makino, A.; Fujita, T.; Yokoyama, U.; et al. Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry (SOCE) Regulates Melanoma Proliferation and Cell Migration. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Kim, J.H.; Lkhagvadorj, S.; Lee, M.R.; Hwang, K.H.; Chung, H.C.; Jung, J.H.; Cha, S.K.; Eom, M. Orai1 and STIM1 are critical for cell migration and proliferation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 448, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Feng, M.; Grice, D.M.; Faddy, H.M.; Nguyen, N.; Leitch, S.; Wang, Y.; Muend, S.; Kenny, P.A.; Sukumar, S.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; et al. Store-independent activation of Orai1 by SPCA2 in mammary tumors. Cell 2010, 143, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  279. Tajeddine, N.; Gailly, P. TRPC1 Protein Channel Is Major Regulator of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 16146–16157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Wang, L.; Wu, Y.; Lin, L.; Liu, P.; Huang, H.; Liao, W.; Zheng, D.; Zuo, Q.; Sun, L.; Huang, N.; et al. Metastasis-associated in colon cancer-1 upregulation predicts a poor prognosis of gastric cancer, and promotes tumor cell proliferation and invasion. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  281. Guo, Y.; Pan, W.; Liu, S.; Shen, Z.; Xu, Y.; Hu, L. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  282. Mebratu, Y.; Tesfaigzi, Y. How ERK1/2 activation controls cell proliferation and cell death is subcellular localization the answer? Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Muzny, D.M.; Bainbridge, M.N.; Chang, K.; Dinh, H.H.; Drummond, J.A.; Fowler, G.; Kovar, C.L.; Lewis, L.R.; Morgan, M.B.; Newsham, I.F.; et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012, 487, 330–337. [Google Scholar]
  284. Wang, J.Y.; Chen, B.K.; Wang, Y.S.; Tsai, Y.T.; Chen, W.C.; Chang, W.C.; Hou, M.F.; Wu, Y.C.; Chang, W.C. Involvement of store-operated calcium signaling in EGF-mediated COX-2 gene activation in cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2012, 24, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Greenhough, A.; Smartt, H.J.M.; Moore, A.E.; Roberts, H.R.; Williams, A.C.; Paraskeva, C.; Kaidi, A. The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: Key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Azimi, I.; Milevskiy, M.J.G.; Kaemmerer, E.; Turner, D.; Yapa, K.T.D.S.; Brown, M.A.; Thompson, E.W.; Roberts-Thomson, S.J.; Monteith, G.R. TRPC1 is a differential regulator of hypoxia-mediated events and Akt signaling in PTEN-deficient breast cancer cells. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 2292–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  287. Chigurupati, S.; Venkataraman, R.; Barrera, D.; Naganathan, A.; Madan, M.; Paul, L.; Pattisapu, J.V.; Kyriazis, G.A.; Sugaya, K.; Bushnev, S.; et al. Receptor Channel TRPC6 Is a Key Mediator of Notch-Driven Glioblastoma Growth and Invasiveness. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Bass, A.J.; Thorsson, V.; Shmulevich, I.; Reynolds, S.M.; Miller, M.; Bernard, B.; Hinoue, T.; Laird, P.W.; Curtis, C.; Shen, H.; et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014, 513, 202–209. [Google Scholar]
  289. Getz, G.; Gabriel, S.B.; Cibulskis, K.; Lander, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Sougnez, C.; Lawrence, M.; Kandoth, C.; Dooling, D.; Fulton, R.; et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 2013, 497, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  290. Frischauf, I.; Litviňuková, M.; Schober, R.; Zayats, V.; Svobodová, B.; Bonhenry, D.; Lunz, V.; Cappello, S.; Tociu, L.; Reha, D.; et al. Transmembrane helix connectivity in Orai1 controls two gates for calcium-dependent transcription. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaao0358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  291. Lawrence, M.S.; Sougnez, C.; Lichtenstein, L.; Cibulskis, K.; Lander, E.; Gabriel, S.B.; Getz, G.; Ally, A.; Balasundaram, M.; Birol, I.; et al. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature 2015, 517, 576–582. [Google Scholar]
  292. Tiffner, A.; Derler, I. Molecular choreography and structure of Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) and KCa2+ channels and their relevance in disease with special focus on cancer. Membranes 2020, 10, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Srikanth, S.; Gwack, Y. Orai1-NFAT signalling pathway triggered by T cell receptor stimulation. Mol. Cells 2013, 35, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Lee, K.P.; Yuan, J.P.; Zeng, W.; So, I.; Worley, P.F.; Muallem, S. Molecular determinants of fast Ca 2+ -dependent inactivation and gating of the Orai channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14687–14692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  295. Yang, S.L.; Cao, Q.; Zhou, K.C.; Feng, Y.J.; Wang, Y.Z. Transient receptor potential channel C3 contributes to the progression of human ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2009, 28, 1320–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  296. Siaw, W.N.; di Capite, J.; Singaravelu, K.; Parekh, A.B. Sustained activation of the tyrosine kinase syk by antigen in mast cells requires local Ca2+ influx through Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 31348–31355. [Google Scholar]
  297. Di Sabatino, A.; Rovedatti, L.; Kaur, R.; Spencer, J.P.; Brown, J.T.; Morisset, V.D.; Biancheri, P.; Leakey, N.A.B.; Wilde, J.I.; Scott, L.; et al. Targeting Gut T Cell Ca 2+ Release-Activated Ca2+ Channels Inhibits T Cell Cytokine Production and T-Box Transcription Factor T-Bet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 3454–3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Waldherr, L.; Tiffner, A.; Mishra, D.; Sallinger, M.; Schober, R.; Frischauf, I.; Schmidt, T.; Handl, V.; Sagmeister, P.; Köckinger, M.; et al. Blockage of store-operated Ca2+ influx by synta66 is mediated by direct inhibition of the Ca2+ selective orai1 pore. Cancers 2020, 12, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Thomas, S.; Quinn, B.A.; Das, S.K.; Dash, R.; Emdad, L.; Dasgupta, S.; Wang, X.Y.; Dent, P.; Reed, J.C.; Pellecchia, M.; et al. Targeting the Bcl-2 family for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  300. Thomas, L.W.; Lam, C.; Edwards, S.W. Mcl-1; the molecular regulation of protein function. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 2981–2989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  301. Mignen, O.; Brink, C.; Enfissi, A.; Nadkarni, A.; Shuttleworth, T.J.; Giovannucci, D.R.; Capiod, T. Carboxyamidotriazole-induced inhibition of mitochondrial calcium import blocks capacitative calcium entry and cell proliferation in HEK-293 cells. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 5615–5623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  302. Bonnefond, M.L.; Florent, R.; Lenoir, S.; Lambert, B.; Abeilard, E.; Giffard, F.; Louis, M.H.; Elie, N.; Briand, M.; Vivien, D.; et al. Inhibition of store-operated channels by carboxyamidotriazole sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to anti-BclxL strategies through Mcl-1 down-regulation. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 33896–33911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  303. Mercer, J.C.; Qi, Q.; Mottram, L.F.; Law, M.; Bruce, D.; Iyer, A.; Morales, J.L.; Yamazaki, H.; Shirao, T.; Peterson, B.R.; et al. Chemico-genetic identification of drebrin as a regulator of calcium responses. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 42, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  304. Ohga, K.; Takezawa, R.; Arakida, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Ishikawa, J. Characterization of YM-58483/BTP2, a novel store-operated Ca2+ entry blocker, on T cell-mediated immune responses in vivo. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2008, 8, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. End, D.W.; Smets, G.; Todd, A.V.; Applegate, T.L.; Fuery, C.J.; Angibaud, P.; Venet, M.; Sanz, G.; Poignet, H.; Skrzat, S.; et al. Characterization of the antitumor effects of the selective farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in vivo and in vitro. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  306. Khan, H.Y.; Mpilla, G.B.; Sexton, R.; Viswanadha, S.; Penmetsa, K.V.; Aboukameel, A.; Diab, M.; Kamgar, M.; Al-Hallak, M.N.; Szlaczky, M.; et al. Calcium Release-Activated Calcium (CRAC) Channel Inhibition Suppresses Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cell Proliferation and Patient-Derived Tumor Growth. Cancers 2020, 12, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  307. Cui, C.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Choi, S.; Tran, H.; Penmetsa, K.V.; Viswanadha, S.; Fu, L.; Pan, Z. Targeting Orai1-mediated store-operated calcium entry by RP4010 for anti-tumor activity in esophagus squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2018, 432, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Daya, H.A.; Kouba, S.; Ouled-Haddou, H.; Benzerdjeb, N.; Telliez, M.S.; Dayen, C.; Sevestre, H.; Garçon, L.; Hague, F.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Orai3-Mediates Cisplatin-Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells by Enriching Cancer Stem Cell Population through PI3K/AKT Pathway. Cancers 2021, 13, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Stauderman, K.A. CRAC channels as targets for drug discovery and development. Cell Calcium 2018, 74, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Adelman, J.P. SK channels and calmodulin. Channels 2016, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  311. Lee, W.S.; Ngo-Anh, T.J.; Bruening-Wright, A.; Maylie, J.; Adelman, J.P. Small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and calmodulin—Cell surface expression and gating. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25940–25946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  312. Lee, C.H.; MacKinnon, R. Activation mechanism of a human SK-calmodulin channel complex elucidated by cryo-EM structures. Science 2018, 360, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  313. Ma, K.; Wang, H.; Yu, J.; Wei, M.; Xiao, Q. New Insights on the Regulation of Ca2+ -Activated Chloride Channel TMEM16A. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Wang, H.; Zou, L.; Ma, K.; Yu, J.; Wu, H.; Wei, M.; Xiao, Q. Cell-specific mechanisms of TMEM16A Ca2+-activated chloride channel in cancer. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Stocker, M. Ca2+-activated K+ channels: Molecular determinants and function of the SK family. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5, 758–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Gueguinou, M.; Gambade, A.; Felix, R.; Chantome, A.; Fourbon, Y.; Bougnoux, P.; Weber, G.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandier, C. Lipid rafts, KCa/ClCa/Ca2+ channel complexes and EGFR signaling: Novel targets to reduce tumor development by lipids? Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 2015, 1848, 2603–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  317. Berkefeld, H.; Fakler, B.; Schulte, U. Ca2+-activated K+ channels: From protein complexes to function. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 1437–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  318. Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, K. The Ca2+-activated chloride channel ANO1/TMEM16A: An emerging therapeutic target for epithelium-originated diseases? Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 1412–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Lallet-Daher, H.; Roudbaraki, M.; Bavencoffe, A.; Mariot, P.; Gackiere, F.; Bidaux, G.; Urbain, R.; Gosset, P.; Delcourt, P.; Fleurisse, L.; et al. Intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (IKCa1) regulate human prostate cancer cell proliferation through a close control of calcium entry. Oncogene 2009, 28, 1792–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  320. Chantome, A.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Clarysse, L.; Fromont, G.; Marionneau-Lambot, S.; Gueguinou, M.; Pagès, J.C.; Collin, C.; Oullier, T.; Girault, V.; et al. Pivotal role of the lipid Raft SK3-Orai1 complex in human cancer cell migration and bone metastases. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 4852–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  321. Gueguinou, M.; Crottes, D.; Chantome, A.; Rapetti-Mauss, R.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Clarysse, L.; Girault, A.; Fourbon, Y.; Jézéquel, P.; Guérin-Charbonnel, C.; et al. The SigmaR1 chaperone drives breast and colorectal cancer cell migration by tuning SK3-dependent Ca2+ homeostasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 3640–3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  322. Clarysse, L.; Gueguinou, M.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandecasteele, G.; Bougnoux, P.; Chevalier, S.; Chantôme, A.; Vandier, C. cAMP-PKA inhibition of SK3 channel reduced both Ca2+ entry and cancer cell migration by regulation of SK3-Orai1 complex. Pflug. Arch. 2014, 466, 1921–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Gueguinou, M.; Harnois, T.; Crottes, D.; Uguen, A.; Deliot, N.; Gambade, A.; Chantôme, A.; Haelters, J.P.; Jaffrès, P.A.; Jourdan, M.L.; et al. SK3/TRPC1/Orai1 complex regulates SOCE-dependent colon cancer cell migration: A novel opportunity to modulate anti-EGFR mAb action by the alkyl-lipid Ohmline. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 36168–36184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  324. Weaver, A.K.; Bomben, V.C.; Sontheimer, H. Expression and function of calcium-activated potassium channels in human glioma cells. Glia 2006, 54, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  325. Girault, A.; Haelters, J.P.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Chantome, A.; Jaffres, P.A.; Bougnoux, P.; Joulin, V.; Vandier, C. Targeting SKCa Channels in Cancer: Potential New Therapeutic Approaches. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Klumpp, L.; Sezgin, E.C.; Skardelly, M.; Eckert, F.; Huber, S.M. KCa3.1 channels and glioblastoma: In vitro studies. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2017, 16, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Potier, M.; Joulin, V.; Roger, S.; Besson, P.; Jourdan, M.L.; Leguennec, J.Y.; Bougnoux, P.; Vandier, C. Identification of SK3 channel as a new mediator of breast cancer cell migration. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 2946–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  328. Carignani, C.; Roncarati, R.; Rimini, R.; Terstappen, G.C. Pharmacological and molecular characterisation of SK3 channels in the TE671 human medulloblastoma cell line. Brain Res. 2002, 939, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Girault, A.; Haelters, J.P.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Chantome, A.; Pinault, M.; Marionneau-Lambot, S.; Oullier, T.; Simon, G.; Couthon-Gourvès, H.; Jaffrès, P.A.; et al. New alkyl-lipid blockers of SK3 channels reduce cancer cell migration and occurrence of metastasis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2011, 11, 1111–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Jelassi, B.; Chantme, A.; Alcaraz-Pérez, F.; Baroja-Mazo, A.; Cayuela, M.L.; Pelegrin, P.; Surprenant, A.; Roger, S. P2X 7 receptor activation enhances SK3 channels- and cystein cathepsin-dependent cancer cells invasiveness. Oncogene 2011, 30, 2108–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  331. Bery, F.; Cancel, M.; Guéguinou, M.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandier, C.; Chantôme, A.; Guibon, R.; Bruyère, F.; Fromont, G.; Mahéo, K. Zeb1 and sk3 channel are up-regulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer and promote neuroendocrine differentiation. Cancers 2021, 13, 2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Vergara, C.; Latorre, R.; Marrion, N.V.; Adelman, J.P. Calcium-activated potassium channels. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Stocker, M.; Pedarzani, P. Differential distribution of three Ca2+-activated K+ channel subunits, SK1, SK2, and SK3, in the adult rat central nervous system. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2000, 15, 476–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Ishii, T.M.; Silvia, C.; Hirschberg, B.; Bond, C.T.; Adelman, J.P.; Maylie, J. A human intermediate conductance calcium-activated potassium channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11651–11656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  335. Lee, U.S.; Cui, J. BK channel activation: Structural and functional insights. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Meng, E.C.; Couch, G.S.; Croll, T.I.; Morris, J.H.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Keen, J.E.; Khawaled, R.; Farrens, D.L.; Neelands, T.; Rivard, A.; Bond, C.T.; Janowsky, A.; Fakler, B.; Adelman, J.P.; Maylie, J. Domains Responsible for Constitutive and Ca2+ -Dependent Interactions between Calmodulin and Small Conductance Ca2+ -Activated Potassium Channels. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 8830–8838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Orfali, R.; Nam, Y.W.; Nguyen, H.M.; Rahman, M.A.; Yang, G.; Cui, M.; Wulff, H.; Zhang, M. Channelopathy-causing mutations in the S(45)A/S(45)B and HA/HB helices of K(Ca)2.3 and K(Ca)3.1 channels alter their apparent Ca2+ sensitivity. Cell Calcium 2022, 102, 102538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Herrera, F.E.; Sevrain, C.M.; Jaffrès, P.A.; Couthon, H.; Grélard, A.; Dufourc, E.J.; Chantôme, A.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandier, C.; Bouchet, A.M. Singular interaction between an antimetastatic agent and the lipid bilayer: The ohmline case. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 6361–6370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Zhang, M.; Meng, X.Y.; Cui, M.; Pascal, J.M.; Logothetis, D.E.; Zhang, J.F. Selective phosphorylation modulates the PIP 2 sensitivity of the CaM-SK channel complex. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  341. Levitan, I.; Fang, Y.; Rosenhouse-Dantsker, A.; Romanenko, V. Cholesterol and ion channels. Subcell. Biochem. 2010, 51, 509–549. [Google Scholar]
  342. Chantome, A.; Girault, A.; Potier, M.; Collin, C.; Vaudin, P.; Pages, J.C.; Vanndier, C.; Joulin, V. KCa2.3 channel-dependent hyperpolarization increases melanoma cell motility. Exp. Cell Res. 2009, 315, 3620–3630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Tiffner, A.; Hopl, V.; Schober, R.; Sallinger, M.; Grabmayr, H.; Höglinger, C.; Fahrner, M.; Lunz, V.; Maltan, L.; Frischauf, I.; et al. Orai1 Boosts SK3 Channel Activation. Cancers 2021, 13, 6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Bloch, M.; Ousingsawat, J.; Simon, R.; Schraml, P.; Gasser, T.C.; Mihatsch, M.J.; Kunzelmann, K.; Bubendorf, L. KCNMA1 gene amplification promotes tumor cell proliferation in human prostate cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26, 2525–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  345. Parihar, A.S.; Coghlan, M.J.; Gopalakrishnan, M.; Shieh, C.C. Effects of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel modulators on human prostate cancer cell proliferation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 471, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Abdullaev, I.F.; Rudkouskaya, A.; Mongin, A.A.; Kuo, Y.H. Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels BK and IK1 Are Functionally Expressed in Human Gliomas but Do Not Regulate Cell Proliferation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. McFerrin, M.B.; Turner, K.L.; Cuddapah, V.A.; Sontheimer, H. Differential role of IK and BK potassium channels as mediators of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic cell death. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2012, 303, C1070–C1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  348. D’Alessandro, G.; Limatola, C.; Catalano, M. Functional Roles of the Ca2+-activated K+ Channel, KCa3.1, in Brain Tumors. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Ohya, S.; Kanatsuka, S.; Hatano, N.; Kito, H.; Matsui, A.; Fujimoto, M.; Matsuba, S.; Niwa, S.; Zhan, P.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Downregulation of the Ca2+-activated K+ channel KCa3.1 by histone deacetylase inhibition in human breast cancer cells. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2016, 4, e00228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Sforna, L.; Megaro, A.; Pessia, M.; Franciolini, F.; Catacuzzeno, L. Structure, Gating and Basic Functions of the Ca2+-activated K Channel of Intermediate Conductance. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Bulk, E.; Ay, A.S.; Hammadi, M.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H.; Schelhaas, S.; Hascher, A.; Rohde, C.; Thoennissen, N.H.; Wiewrodt, R.; Schmidt, E.; et al. Epigenetic dysregulation of KCa3.1 channels induces poor prognosis in lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Grössinger, E.M.; Weiss, L.; Zierler, S.; Rebhandl, S.; Krenn, P.W.; Hinterseer, E.; Schmölzer, J.; Asslaber, D.; Hainzl, S.; Neureiter, D.; et al. Targeting proliferation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells through KCa3.1 blockade. Leukemia 2014, 28, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  353. Quast, S.A.; Berger, A.; Buttstädt, N.; Friebel, K.; Schönherr, R.; Eberle, J. General Sensitization of Melanoma Cells for TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis by the Potassium Channel Inhibitor TRAM-34 Depends on Release of SMAC. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  354. Pillozzi, S.; D’Amico, M.; Bartoli, G.; Gasparoli, L.; Petroni, G.; Crociani, O.; Marzo, T.; Guerriero, A.; Messori, L.; Severi, M.; et al. The combined activation of KCa3.1 and inhibition of Kv11.1/hERG1 currents contribute to overcome Cisplatin resistance in colorectal cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 118, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  355. Rabjerg, M.; Oliván-Viguera, A.; Hansen, L.K.; Jensen, L.; Sevelsted-Møller, L.; Walter, S.; Jensen, B.L.; Marcussen, N.; Köhler, R. High Expression of KCa3.1 in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma Predicts High Metastatic Risk and Poor Survival. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  356. Jiang, S.; Zhu, L.; Yang, J.; Hu, L.; Gu, J.; Xing, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z. Integrated expression profiling of potassium channels identifys KCNN4 as a prognostic biomarker of pancreatic cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 494, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Wen, J.; Lin, B.; Lin, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, O. KCNN4 is a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker that promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression. Aging 2020, 12, 16437–16456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Zhang, P.; Yang, X.; Yin, Q.; Yi, J.; Shen, W.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, J. Inhibition of SK4 Potassium Channels Suppresses Cell Proliferation, Migration and the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  359. Ibrahim, S.; Chaigne, J.; Dakik, H.; Fourbon, Y.; Corset, L.; Lecomte, T.; Raoul, W.; Guéguinou, M. SK4 oncochannels regulate calcium entry and promote cell migration in KRAS-mutated colorectal cancer. Cell Calcium 2021, 96, 102384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Steudel, F.A.; Mohr, C.J.; Stegen, B.; Nguyen, H.Y.; Barnert, A.; Steinle, M.; Beer-Hammer, S.; Koch, P.; Lo, W.Y.; Schroth, W.; et al. SK4 channels modulate Ca2+ signalling and cell cycle progression in murine breast cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2017, 11, 1172–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  361. Mohr, C.J.; Gross, D.; Sezgin, E.C.; Steudel, F.A.; Ruth, P.; Huber, S.M.; Lukowski, R. KCa3.1 Channels Confer Radioresistance to Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  362. D’Alessandro, G.; Grimaldi, A.; Chece, G.; Porzia, A.; Esposito, V.; Santoro, A.; Salvati, M.; Mainiero, F.; Ragozzino, D.; Di Angelantonio, S.; et al. KCa3.1 channel inhibition sensitizes malignant gliomas to temozolomide treatment. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 30781–30796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Robles-Martínez, L.; Garay, E.; Martel-Gallegos, M.G.; Cisneros-Mejorado, A.; Pérez-Montiel, D.; Lara, A.; Arellano, R.O. KCa3.1 Activation via P2y2 Purinergic Receptors Promotes Human Ovarian Cancer Cell (Skov-3) Migration. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  364. Figiel, S.; Bery, F.; Chantôme, A.; Fontaine, D.; Pasqualin, C.; Maupoil, V.; Domingo, I.; Guibon, R.; Bruyère, F.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; et al. A Novel Calcium-Mediated EMT Pathway Controlled by Lipids: An Opportunity for Prostate Cancer Adjuvant Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  365. Tate, J.G.; Bamford, S.; Jubb, H.C.; Sondka, Z.; Beare, D.M.; Bindal, N.; Boutselakis, H.; Cole, C.G.; Creatore, C.; Dawson, E.; et al. COSMIC: The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D941–D947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  366. Bauer, C.K.; Schneeberger, P.E.; Kortüm, F.; Altmüller, J.; Santos-Simarro, F.; Baker, L.; Keller-Ramey, J.; White, S.; Campeau, P.M.; Gripp, K.W.; et al. Gain-of-Function Mutations in KCNN3 Encoding the Small-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channel SK3 Cause Zimmermann-Laband Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019, 104, 1139–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Ouadid-Ahidouch, H.; Roudbaraki, M.; Delcourt, P.; Ahidouch, A.; Joury, N.; Prevarskaya, N. Functional and molecular identification of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels in breast cancer cells: Association with cell cycle progression. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2004, 287, C125–C134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Sundelacruz, S.; Levin, M.; Kaplan, D.L. Role of Membrane Potential in the Regulation of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2009, 5, 231–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Wang, Z.H.; Shen, B.; Yao, H.L.; Jia, Y.C.; Ren, J.; Feng, Y.J.; Wang, Y.Z. Blockage of intermediate-conductance-Ca2+-activated K+ channels inhibits progression of human endometrial cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26, 5107–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  370. D’Alessandro, G.; Catalano, M.; Sciaccaluga, M.; Chece, G.; Cipriani, R.; Rosito, M.; Grimaldi, A.; Lauro, C.; Cantore, G.; Santoro, V.; et al. KCa3.1 channels are involved in the infiltrative behavior of glioblastoma in vivo. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  371. Kischel, P.; Girault, A.; Rodat-Despoix, L.; Chamlali, M.; Radoslavova, S.; Abou Daya, H.; Lefebvre, T.; Foulon, A.; Rybarczyk, P.; Hague, F.; et al. Ion Channels: New Actors Playing in Chemotherapeutic Resistance. Cancers 2019, 11, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  372. Lloyd, K.L.; Cree, I.A.; Savage, R.S. Prediction of resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: A systematic review. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  373. Li, X.; Pennisi, A.; Zhan, F.; Sawyer, J.R.; Shaughnessy, J.D.; Yaccoby, S. Establishment and exploitation of hyperdiploid and non-hyperdiploid human myeloma cell lines. Br. J. Haematol. 2007, 138, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  374. Lee, E.L.; Hasegawa, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Okada, Y. IK1 channel activity contributes to cisplatin sensitivity of human epidermoid cancer cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2008, 294, C1398–C1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  375. Lin, P.; Li, J.; Ye, F.; Fu, W.; Hu, X.; Shao, Z.; Song, C. KCNN4 induces multiple chemoresistance in breast cancer by regulating BCL2A1. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020, 10, 3302–3315. [Google Scholar]
  376. Steinestel, K.; Eder, S.; Ehinger, K.; Schneider, J.; Genze, F.; Winkler, E.; Wardelmann, E.; Schrader, A.J.; Steinestel, J. The small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel 3 (SK3) is a molecular target for Edelfosine to reduce the invasive potential of urothelial carcinoma cells. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 6275–6283, Erratum in Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Bery, F.; Figiel, S.; Kouba, S.; Fontaine, D.; Guéguinou, M.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Vandier, C.; Guibon, R.; Bruyère, F.; Fromont, G.; et al. Hypoxia Promotes Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Upregulating EMT-Activator Zeb1 and SK3 Channel Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Gackiere, F.; Warnier, M.; Katsogiannou, M.; Derouiche, S.; Delcourt, P.; Dewailly, E.; Slomianny, C.; Humez, S.; Prevarskaya, N.; Roudbaraki, M.; et al. Functional coupling between large-conductance potassium channels and Cav3.2 voltage-dependent calcium channels participates in prostate cancer cell growth. Biol. Open 2013, 2, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  379. Hammadi, M.; Chopin, V.; Matifat, F.; Dhennin-Duthille, I.; Chasseraud, M.; Sevestre, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Human ether a-gogo K+ channel 1 (hEag1) regulates MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell migration through Orai1-dependent calcium entry. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 3837–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Peretti, M.; Badaoui, M.; Girault, A.; van Gulick, L.; Mabille, M.P.; Tebbakha, R.; Sevestre, H.; Morjani, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. Original association of ion transporters mediates the ECM-induced breast cancer cell survival: Kv10.1-Orai1-SPCA2 partnership. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  381. Girault, A.; Peretti, M.; Badaoui, M.; Hémon, A.; Morjani, H.; Ouadid-Ahidouch, H. The N and C-termini of SPCA2 regulate differently Kv10.1 function: Role in the collagen 1-induced breast cancer cell survival. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  382. Song, K.; Zhong, X.G.; Xia, X.M.; Huang, J.H.; Fan, Y.F.; Yuan, R.X.; Xue, N.R.; Du, J.; Han, W.X.; Xu, A.M.; et al. Orai1 forms a signal complex with SK3 channel in gallbladder smooth muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 466, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  383. Saljic, A.; Muthukumarasamy, K.M.; la Cour, J.M.; Boddum, K.; Grunnet, M.; Berchtold, M.W.; Jespersen, T. Impact of arrhythmogenic calmodulin variants on small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (SK3) channels. Physiol. Rep. 2019, 7, e14210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  384. Willoughby, D.; Everett, K.L.; Halls, M.L.; Pacheco, J.; Skroblin, P.; Vaca, L.; Klussmann, E.; Cooper, D.M.F. Direct binding between Orai1 and AC8 mediates dynamic interplay between Ca2+ and cAMP signaling. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  385. Hooper, R.; Zhang, X.; Webster, M.; Go, C.; Kedra, J.; Marchbank, K.; Gill, D.L.; Weeraratna, A.T.; Trebak, M.; Soboloff, J. Novel Protein Kinase C-Mediated Control of Orai1 Function in Invasive Melanoma. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35, 2790–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  386. Kawasaki, T.; Ueyama, T.; Lange, I.; Feske, S.; Saito, N. Protein kinase C-induced phosphorylation of Orai1 regulates the intracellular Ca2+ level via the store-operated Ca2+ channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 25720–25730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  387. Smaardijk, S.; Chen, J.; Wuytack, F.; Vangheluwe, P. SPCA2 couples Ca2+ influx via Orai1 to Ca2+ uptake into the Golgi/secretory pathway. Tissue Cell 2017, 49, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Nicholson, R.I.; Gee, J.M.W.; Harper, M.E. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37 (Suppl. S4), 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Galizia, G.; Lieto, E.; Ferraraccio, F.; de Vita, F.; Castellano, P.; Orditura, M.; Imperatore, V.; La Mura, A.; La Manna, G.; Pinto, M.; et al. Prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006, 13, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Srivats, S.; Balasuriya, D.; Pasche, M.; Vistal, G.; Edwardson, J.M.; Taylor, C.W.; Murrell-Lagnado, R.D. Sigma1 receptors inhibit store-operated Ca2+ entry by attenuating coupling of STIM1 to Orai1. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 213, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  391. Potier, M.; Chantome, A.; Joulin, V.; Girault, A.; Roger, S.; Besson, P.; Jourdan, M.-L.; LeGuennec, J.-Y.; Bougnoux, P.; Vandier, C.; et al. The SK3/KCa2.3 potassium channel is a new cellular target for edelfosine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 162, 464–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  392. Jaffres, P.A.; Gajate, C.; Bouchet, A.M.; Couthon-Gourves, H.; Chantome, A.; Potier-Cartereau, M.; Besson, P.; Bougnoux, P.; Mollinedo, F.; Vandier, C.; et al. Alkyl ether lipids, ion channels and lipid raft reorganization in cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 165, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Ca2+-dependent cancer signaling pathways controlling proliferation, cell survival, and death and migration. (A) The scheme depicts critical pathways for elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ levels (via PM ion channels (here, the focus is on the store-operated Ca2+ ion channel named the CRAC channel, i.e., thepore-forming component Orai1) or upon ER-Ca2+ depletion) that control proliferation at the level of the cell cycle machinery (cyclins, CDKs, CDK inhibitors, centrosome cycle) in a Ca2+-dependent manner, either directly via Ca2+-binding proteins (CaM, CaMK, CN), or indirectly via transcription factors (NFAT, or immediate early gene (JUN, Myc, and FOS)) and the oncogenic pathways, Ras/ERK and PI3K/Akt. (B) Scheme highlights pathways that control cell survival and death factors (e.g., BCL family proteins such as BCL2) in a Ca2+-dependent manner. These include factors modulating ER Ca2+ uptake and Ca2+ crosstalk between ER and mitochondria (SERCA, p53, Akt, IP3R, calpains, caspases). Moreover, the Ca2+-dependent modulation of cell fate via oncogenic pathways is shown. (C) Top: Schematic representation of the transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states (MET-EMT (mesenchymal-epithelial transition <-> epithelial-mesenchymal transition)) and the characteristic up- and down-regulations of specific gene expression markers (E-/N-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin), which are controlled by Ca2+. Bottom: Ca2+-dependent pathways controlling highly coordinated migration together with contacts to the extracellular matrix at the rear and the leading edge of the cell. At the leading edge, Ca2+ triggers lamellipodia formation by actin polymerization, the assembly of focal adhesions, the formation of contact with the bottom, and matrix metalloproteinases (involving small GTPase, such as Ras and Rac1, Ca2+-dependent factors, including CaMK and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2); focal adhesion kinase (FAK)). At the rear edge, the cell disconnects from the bottom, involving focal adhesion disassembly (Ca2+-sensitive protease calpain, which cleaves FAK, vinculin, talin, and integrins) and actomyosin contraction (MLCK). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 1. Ca2+-dependent cancer signaling pathways controlling proliferation, cell survival, and death and migration. (A) The scheme depicts critical pathways for elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ levels (via PM ion channels (here, the focus is on the store-operated Ca2+ ion channel named the CRAC channel, i.e., thepore-forming component Orai1) or upon ER-Ca2+ depletion) that control proliferation at the level of the cell cycle machinery (cyclins, CDKs, CDK inhibitors, centrosome cycle) in a Ca2+-dependent manner, either directly via Ca2+-binding proteins (CaM, CaMK, CN), or indirectly via transcription factors (NFAT, or immediate early gene (JUN, Myc, and FOS)) and the oncogenic pathways, Ras/ERK and PI3K/Akt. (B) Scheme highlights pathways that control cell survival and death factors (e.g., BCL family proteins such as BCL2) in a Ca2+-dependent manner. These include factors modulating ER Ca2+ uptake and Ca2+ crosstalk between ER and mitochondria (SERCA, p53, Akt, IP3R, calpains, caspases). Moreover, the Ca2+-dependent modulation of cell fate via oncogenic pathways is shown. (C) Top: Schematic representation of the transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states (MET-EMT (mesenchymal-epithelial transition <-> epithelial-mesenchymal transition)) and the characteristic up- and down-regulations of specific gene expression markers (E-/N-cadherin, vimentin, fibronectin), which are controlled by Ca2+. Bottom: Ca2+-dependent pathways controlling highly coordinated migration together with contacts to the extracellular matrix at the rear and the leading edge of the cell. At the leading edge, Ca2+ triggers lamellipodia formation by actin polymerization, the assembly of focal adhesions, the formation of contact with the bottom, and matrix metalloproteinases (involving small GTPase, such as Ras and Rac1, Ca2+-dependent factors, including CaMK and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2); focal adhesion kinase (FAK)). At the rear edge, the cell disconnects from the bottom, involving focal adhesion disassembly (Ca2+-sensitive protease calpain, which cleaves FAK, vinculin, talin, and integrins) and actomyosin contraction (MLCK). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g001
Figure 2. Linkage of hypoxia and the Ca2+-signaling machinery in cancer. Hypoxia induces EMT and activates PI3K/Akt, HIF, and NFkB signaling pathways. HIF-1 is involved in angiogenesis, cell proliferation/survival, and invasion/metastasis. It can trigger upregulated expression of Ca2+ ion channels, leading to enhanced Ca2+ levels that promote transcription of oncogenes. Conversely, Ca2+ can modulate HIF-1 signaling. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 2. Linkage of hypoxia and the Ca2+-signaling machinery in cancer. Hypoxia induces EMT and activates PI3K/Akt, HIF, and NFkB signaling pathways. HIF-1 is involved in angiogenesis, cell proliferation/survival, and invasion/metastasis. It can trigger upregulated expression of Ca2+ ion channels, leading to enhanced Ca2+ levels that promote transcription of oncogenes. Conversely, Ca2+ can modulate HIF-1 signaling. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g002
Figure 3. The STIM1-Orai1 activation mechanism and STIM and Orai isoforms. (A) Illustration of the activation mechanism of the CRAC channel, starting with inactive STIM1 and Orai1 in the resting state (left), followed by the depiction of the two proteins in the activated state allowing Ca2+ influx indicated by the green arrow (right), with the most important interaction sites highlighted. (B) A schematic illustration of the STIM1 and STIM2 isoforms consisting of the respective canonical EF-hand domain (cEF) and the hidden EF-hand domain (hEF), followed by the sterile alpha motif (SAM) in the ER lumen and subsequently the single TM. The C-terminus located in the cytosol contains three coiled-coil domains (CC1–3), more specifically, the three predicted α-helices of CC1 (α1–3). These coiled-coil regions comprise the Orai-activating small fragment (OASF), which spans all three coiled-coil domains, the CRAC-activating domain (CAD), or the STIM1-Orai-activating region (SOAR), which includes CC2 and CC3. The coiled-coil regions are followed by the inactivation domain (ID), the microtubule end-binding domain (EB), and finally, the polybasic domain (PBD) at the very end of the C-terminus. (C) An overview of all Orai proteins (Orai1, Orai2, Orai3) highlighting the TM domains alongside major positions for CRAC channel gating (Orai1 aa 72-90—ETON region, R91—SCID mutation position, E106—selectivity filter, H134, P245—critical gating checkpoints, L273—critical STIM1 binding site and analogue sites are labeled in Orai2 and Orai3). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 3. The STIM1-Orai1 activation mechanism and STIM and Orai isoforms. (A) Illustration of the activation mechanism of the CRAC channel, starting with inactive STIM1 and Orai1 in the resting state (left), followed by the depiction of the two proteins in the activated state allowing Ca2+ influx indicated by the green arrow (right), with the most important interaction sites highlighted. (B) A schematic illustration of the STIM1 and STIM2 isoforms consisting of the respective canonical EF-hand domain (cEF) and the hidden EF-hand domain (hEF), followed by the sterile alpha motif (SAM) in the ER lumen and subsequently the single TM. The C-terminus located in the cytosol contains three coiled-coil domains (CC1–3), more specifically, the three predicted α-helices of CC1 (α1–3). These coiled-coil regions comprise the Orai-activating small fragment (OASF), which spans all three coiled-coil domains, the CRAC-activating domain (CAD), or the STIM1-Orai-activating region (SOAR), which includes CC2 and CC3. The coiled-coil regions are followed by the inactivation domain (ID), the microtubule end-binding domain (EB), and finally, the polybasic domain (PBD) at the very end of the C-terminus. (C) An overview of all Orai proteins (Orai1, Orai2, Orai3) highlighting the TM domains alongside major positions for CRAC channel gating (Orai1 aa 72-90—ETON region, R91—SCID mutation position, E106—selectivity filter, H134, P245—critical gating checkpoints, L273—critical STIM1 binding site and analogue sites are labeled in Orai2 and Orai3). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g003
Figure 4. Cancer features and associated CRAC channel-dependent signaling pathways in different cancer types. The schematics summarize the current knowledge of signaling pathways controlling cancer features (proliferation (A), apoptosis (B), EMT/migration (C), and hypoxia (D)) of the mentioned cancer types depending on CRAC channel components, TRP channels, or SPCA2. ? … signaling pathway is unknow. Colors indicate which cancer type correlates (arrow in corresponding color) which signaling pathway. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 4. Cancer features and associated CRAC channel-dependent signaling pathways in different cancer types. The schematics summarize the current knowledge of signaling pathways controlling cancer features (proliferation (A), apoptosis (B), EMT/migration (C), and hypoxia (D)) of the mentioned cancer types depending on CRAC channel components, TRP channels, or SPCA2. ? … signaling pathway is unknow. Colors indicate which cancer type correlates (arrow in corresponding color) which signaling pathway. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g004
Figure 5. STIM1 and Orai1 cancer-related mutations. Schematic representation of the major components of STIM1 and Orai1 highlighting those point mutations associated with cancer cell development, including glioblastoma, cervical cancer, gastric cancer, uterine cancer, colorectal tumor, glioblastoma, lung adenocarcinoma, skin melanoma, and others [144,290]. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 5. STIM1 and Orai1 cancer-related mutations. Schematic representation of the major components of STIM1 and Orai1 highlighting those point mutations associated with cancer cell development, including glioblastoma, cervical cancer, gastric cancer, uterine cancer, colorectal tumor, glioblastoma, lung adenocarcinoma, skin melanoma, and others [144,290]. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g005
Figure 6. A general overview of SK channels and their activation mechanism. (A) Simplified scheme of the 6 TM domains (S1–S6) of the SK channel, with the pore located between S5 and S6 and both the N- as well as the C-terminus in the cytosol. (B) Side and top view of SK4 with the constitutively bound CaM in dark gray (PDB ID: 6CNM—visualized by ChimeraX [336]). (C) Activation mechanism of the SK channel, starting with an inactive channel and the free CaM N-lobe with no bound Ca2+. The C-lobe of CaM is constitutively bound to the channel (left). The binding of Ca2+, mainly to the CaM N-lobe, triggers a conformational change leading to the interaction between the CaM N-lobe and the S45A helix (middle), further communicating a conformational change to the channel, pulling the S45B away from the pore and rendering the channel open (right) (adapted from Lee et al., 2018 [312]). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 6. A general overview of SK channels and their activation mechanism. (A) Simplified scheme of the 6 TM domains (S1–S6) of the SK channel, with the pore located between S5 and S6 and both the N- as well as the C-terminus in the cytosol. (B) Side and top view of SK4 with the constitutively bound CaM in dark gray (PDB ID: 6CNM—visualized by ChimeraX [336]). (C) Activation mechanism of the SK channel, starting with an inactive channel and the free CaM N-lobe with no bound Ca2+. The C-lobe of CaM is constitutively bound to the channel (left). The binding of Ca2+, mainly to the CaM N-lobe, triggers a conformational change leading to the interaction between the CaM N-lobe and the S45A helix (middle), further communicating a conformational change to the channel, pulling the S45B away from the pore and rendering the channel open (right) (adapted from Lee et al., 2018 [312]). Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g006
Figure 7. Cancer features and associated SK channel-dependent signaling pathways in different cancer types. The scheme summarizes the current knowledge of signaling pathways controlling cancer features (proliferation and EMT/migration) of the mentioned cancer types depending on SK channels as well as Ca2+ signaling. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 7. Cancer features and associated SK channel-dependent signaling pathways in different cancer types. The scheme summarizes the current knowledge of signaling pathways controlling cancer features (proliferation and EMT/migration) of the mentioned cancer types depending on SK channels as well as Ca2+ signaling. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g007
Figure 8. The Orai1/SK3 interplay and methods of its modulation in breast, colon, and prostate cancer. (A) Generally, the co-localization of Orai1 and SK3 channels is sufficient for their interplay, which leads to a positive feedback mechanism. Orai1 E106Q pore mutant does not affect its co-localization with SK3 but is unable to boost SK3 K+ currents. CaMMUT, which typically abolishes SK3 K+ currents, can be rescued by co-localized Orai1. In the presence of STIM1, the SK3–Orai1 interplay remains unaffected in the resting state, and upon store-depletion, STIM1 binds to Orai1 and thus moves SK3 and Orai1 apart from each other. Local enhancements of Ca2+ due to STIM1-mediated Orai1 activation do not boost SK3 K+ currents, whereas global Ca2+ enhancements strongly augment SK3 K+ currents. (B) In breast cancer cells, the interplay of Orai1 and SK3 boosts metastasis, which can be modulated by the cAMP-PKA pathway (adapted from Clarysse et al. (2014) [322]). Additionally, the stress-activated chaperone SigmaR1 promotes the interplay of Orai1 and SK3 in breast cancer cells (adapted from Gueguinou et al. (2017) [321]). (C) In colon cancer cells, migration is promoted by SOCE via a complex of TRPC1, Orai1, and SK3. This involves the activation of the Akt pathway and the phosphorylation of STIM1, leading to a positive feedback loop (adapted from Gueguinou et al. (2016) [323]). (D) SK3, reported to be endogenously expressed in the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation. The application of Enzalutamide enables the upregulation of SK3 expression in LNCaP cells (adapted from Figiel et al. (2019) [364]). Further involvement of accessory proteins, such as SigmaR1, cannot be ruled out and require further investigation. Throughout the figure, arrows indicate the direction of the ion flux. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Figure 8. The Orai1/SK3 interplay and methods of its modulation in breast, colon, and prostate cancer. (A) Generally, the co-localization of Orai1 and SK3 channels is sufficient for their interplay, which leads to a positive feedback mechanism. Orai1 E106Q pore mutant does not affect its co-localization with SK3 but is unable to boost SK3 K+ currents. CaMMUT, which typically abolishes SK3 K+ currents, can be rescued by co-localized Orai1. In the presence of STIM1, the SK3–Orai1 interplay remains unaffected in the resting state, and upon store-depletion, STIM1 binds to Orai1 and thus moves SK3 and Orai1 apart from each other. Local enhancements of Ca2+ due to STIM1-mediated Orai1 activation do not boost SK3 K+ currents, whereas global Ca2+ enhancements strongly augment SK3 K+ currents. (B) In breast cancer cells, the interplay of Orai1 and SK3 boosts metastasis, which can be modulated by the cAMP-PKA pathway (adapted from Clarysse et al. (2014) [322]). Additionally, the stress-activated chaperone SigmaR1 promotes the interplay of Orai1 and SK3 in breast cancer cells (adapted from Gueguinou et al. (2017) [321]). (C) In colon cancer cells, migration is promoted by SOCE via a complex of TRPC1, Orai1, and SK3. This involves the activation of the Akt pathway and the phosphorylation of STIM1, leading to a positive feedback loop (adapted from Gueguinou et al. (2016) [323]). (D) SK3, reported to be endogenously expressed in the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation. The application of Enzalutamide enables the upregulation of SK3 expression in LNCaP cells (adapted from Figiel et al. (2019) [364]). Further involvement of accessory proteins, such as SigmaR1, cannot be ruled out and require further investigation. Throughout the figure, arrows indicate the direction of the ion flux. Software used for all figure drawings: Procreate, Chemdraw (RRID:SCR_016768).
Cancers 15 00101 g008
Table 1. Correlation of cancer types with critical CRAC channel components.
Table 1. Correlation of cancer types with critical CRAC channel components.
Cancer typeCritical ProteinsTargeted Signaling PathwaysAffected Cancer HallmarksCell TypeRef
Breast↑STIM1, ↑Orai1small GTPases ↑Ras and ↑Rac -> ↓focal adhesions ->migration, metastasisMDA-MB231[82]
↑Orai1 +↑SPCA2↑vimentin
↑Wnt/Ca2+ sig. pathway -> CaMKII -> ß-catenin ->↓Wnt
EMTMCF-7[273]
↑Orai3↑ER ->cell proliferation[126,127]
↑ERK1/2 ->↑Myc -> ↑cell cycle (G1) ->cell proliferation[253]
↑PI3K -> ↓p53 ->apoptosis[271]
hypoxia ->EMTMDA-MB-468[62]
STIM2 + Orai1(↑?)PAR-2 ->survival, invasion, cancer prognosisMCF-7, MDA-MB-231[250]
Cervical↑STIM1, ↑Orai1↑cell cycle (G1/S (CDK2, cyclin E)) ->proliferationSiHa, HeLa, U2OS[274]
↑EGF -> ↑calpain ->↑α-spectrin ->migration, metastasisSiHa, CaSki, human patient and mice tissues/cells[248]
↑FAK and ↑Pyk2 ->↓focal adhesions ->migration, metastasis
S and G2/M phases (↓p21, ↑Cdc25C) ->proliferation
VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) ->angiogenesis
Colorectal↑STIM1↑EGF -> ↑COX-2 -> ↑PGE2 ->migration, EMTDDL-1, HT-29, patient samples[85]
↑Orai1, Orai3hypoxia -> ↑HIF-1/2a -> ↑Orai3 ->migrationCW-2[275]
↓STIM2 + ↑TRPC1 + ↑Orai1 + ↑STIM1n.d.proliferation, invasion, survival, apoptosisHT29[254]
Esophageal↑Orai1 (STIM2?)↑ERK & Akt -> cell cycle (↓cdc2, ↓cyclin B1, ↓p27) ->proliferationKYSE-150, patient and mouse samples[255]
↑vimentin, ↑Rac1, ↓E-cadherin -> cytoskeleton ->migration, invasion
Gastric↑STIM1, ↑Orai1cell cycle (↑cyclin D1, ↓p21) ->proliferation, metabolism, migration, invasion, metastasisGS, BGC-803, BGC-823, MGC-803, MKN-28, MKN-45, SGC-7901, nude mice, patient samples[53]
↑vimentin, ↑fibronectin, ↑MACC1, ↓E-cadherin ->migration, metastasis
Glioblastoma↑STIM1cell cycle (G0/G1 phase, ↑cyclin D1, ↑CDK4, ↓p21) ->proliferationU251, U87 and U373[88]
↑Orai1↑Pyk2 -> ↓focal adhesion ->
↑vimentin, ↓E-cadherin, ↑N-cadherin (EMT like) ->
migration, invasionU251/SNB19[272]
HematologicAML↑Orai1, ↑Orai2↑FAK -> ↓focal adhesions ->proliferation, migrationHL60[245]
Orai3↑Ras -> ↑Orai3 ->cell survivalU937, 8226[262]
MM↑STIM1, ↑Orai1↑cell cycle ->proliferation, apoptosisKM3, U266[261]
CLL↑STIM1, ↑Orai1, ↑TRPC1n.d.proliferation, cancer progressionU937, 8226[89]
Liver↑STIM1↑FAK-Y397 -> ↓focal adhesions ->migrationHCC-LM3[257]
↑STIM1, ↑Orai1, ↑TRPC6cell cycle (↑cyclin D1) ->proliferationHuh-7[258]
Lung↓Orai1↑EGF -> ↑PI3K/Akt -> cell cycle (G1/S phase; ↑cyclin D) ->proliferationA549[79]
↑Orai3/Orai1↑EGF -> PI3K/Akt -> cell cycle (G1/S phase; ↑cyclin D1/E, ↑CDK4 and ↑CDK2) ->proliferation, cell cycle progressionNCI-H23, NCI-H460, patients[249]
Melanoma↑STIM1, ↑Orai1↑CaMKII/Raf-1/ERK ->proliferation, migration, metastasisSK-Mel-2, C8161, SK-Mel-24, UACC2577, WM3248, [276]
↑STIM2, ↑Orai1n.d.migration, invasionSK-MEL-5, SK-MEL-28, WM3734[108]
↓STIM2, ↓Orai1CREB/β-catenin -> MITFproliferation
Ovarian↑STIM1, ↑Orai1↑Akt ->apoptosisA2780[264]
↑TRPC1, ↑TRPC3, ↑TRPC4, ↑TRPC6RTK? ->proliferationSKOV3, ATCC
HTB-77
[263]
Pancreatic↑STIM1, ↑Orai1n.d.apoptosisPanc1, (ASPC1, BxPC3, MiaPaca2, Capan1)[265]
↑Orai3↑cell cycle (G2/M-phase)proliferationPanc1, (ASPC1, BxPC3, MiaPaCa2, Capan1)[266]
Prostate↓Orai1↓ARapoptosisLNCaP, DU-145, and PC-3[80]
↑Orai1/Orai3cell cycle (G1/S phase; ↑cyclin D)proliferationLNCaP[269]
↓SOCE ->apoptosis
Renal↑STIM1, ↑Orai1n.d.proliferation, migrationccRCC, ACHN and Caki1, patient samples[277]
Symbol: ? … unknown role or pathway.
Table 2. Correlation of cancer types with critical SK channels.
Table 2. Correlation of cancer types with critical SK channels.
Cancer TypeCritical ProteinsTargeted Signaling PathwaysAffected Cancer HallmarksCell TypeRef
breast↑SK3n.d.migration, metastasisMDA-MB-435s[327]
↑SK4cell cycle (G1, S phases), ↑cdc25Cproliferationmice[360]
EGF -> vimentin, snail1proliferation, migration, EMTMCF-7, T47D, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468, patients[358]
↑SK3, ↑P2X7Rhypoxia ->↑ERK1/2 ->↑Akt (?)proliferation, invasiveness, migrationMDA-MB-435s[330]
colorectal↑SK4↑Ras/ERK (KRAS)/HIF1a/ROSmigration, invasion, metastasisHCT116[359]
glioblastoma↑SK4↑cell cycle (G2, M phases)invasion, proliferation, poor prognosisT98G, U87MG, GL261, patients[362]
hematologic CCL↑SK4n.d.proliferationpatients[352]
melanoma↑SK3n.d.migration, metastasis518A2, HBL, Bris[342]
ovarian↑SK4, P2y2n.d.proliferation, migration, cancer progressionSkov-3, patients[361,363]
pancreatic↑SK4↑KRAS -> ↑RAS -> ↑ERK/PI3Kproliferation, poor prognosismice, patients[356]
prostate↑SK3 (↑ZEB1)↑Snail, ↑Slug, ↑TwistEMT, neuroendocrine differentiation, drug resistanceLNCaP, patients[331,364]
Symbol: ? … unknown role or pathway.
Table 3. Correlation of cancer types with detected SK3–Orai1 interplay and accessory proteins, targeted signaling pathways, types of affected cancer hallmarks, and corresponding cell type.
Table 3. Correlation of cancer types with detected SK3–Orai1 interplay and accessory proteins, targeted signaling pathways, types of affected cancer hallmarks, and corresponding cell type.
Cancer TypeCritical ProteinsTargeted Signaling PathwaysAffected Cancer HallmarksCell TypeRef
BreastSK3 + ↑Orai1cAMP-PKA (↓SK3 activity due to phosphorylation)migration, metastasisMDA-MB-435s[322]
SK3 + ↑Orai1 + ↑SigmaR1n.d.migrationMDA-MB-435[321]
colonSK3 + ↑Orai1 + ↑SigmaR1n.d.migrationHCT-116, patients[321]
↑SK3 + ↑Orai1 + ↑TRPC1 + ↑STIM1↑EGFR -> ↑PI3K -> ↑Akt -> ↑Rac-1 -> ↑CalpainmigrationHCT-116[323]
↑EGFR -> ↑PI3K -> ↑Akt -> STIM1migration
prostateSK3 + Orai1n.d.proliferationLNCaP[343]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tiffner, A.; Hopl, V.; Derler, I. CRAC and SK Channels: Their Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Cancer Cell Development. Cancers 2023, 15, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010101

AMA Style

Tiffner A, Hopl V, Derler I. CRAC and SK Channels: Their Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Cancer Cell Development. Cancers. 2023; 15(1):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tiffner, Adéla, Valentina Hopl, and Isabella Derler. 2023. "CRAC and SK Channels: Their Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Cancer Cell Development" Cancers 15, no. 1: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010101

APA Style

Tiffner, A., Hopl, V., & Derler, I. (2023). CRAC and SK Channels: Their Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Cancer Cell Development. Cancers, 15(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop