Next Article in Journal
Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
Previous Article in Journal
A Low Dose Combination of Withaferin A and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Possesses Anti-Metastatic Potential In Vitro: Molecular Targets and Mechanisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers14030788
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk Factors for Female Breast Cancer: A Population Cohort Study

by
Yu-Chiao Wang
1,
Ching-Hung Lin
2,3,
Shih-Pei Huang
4,5,
Mingchih Chen
1,6 and
Tian-Shyug Lee
1,6,*
1
Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
2
Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center Hospital, Taipei 10016, Taiwan
3
Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10016, Taiwan
4
Adjunct Department and Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan
5
Intelligent Medical Big Data Co., Ltd., Taipei 10044, Taiwan
6
Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(3), 788; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030788
Submission received: 19 December 2021 / Revised: 22 January 2022 / Accepted: 1 February 2022 / Published: 3 February 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In recent years, it has been emphasized that the development of a healthy lifestyle can prevent the incidence of cancer, and several recent studies on female breast cancer (BC) have also become interested in sedentary behavioral issues. Our prospective cohort study found that, in addition to the currently known risk factors (RFs) such as parity and body mass index (BMI), which affect the probability of developing BC in women, a sedentary lifestyle and drinking sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) can cause BC. Therefore, we propose that the modifiable risk profiles of sedentary behavior and sugary beverage consumption may also be associated with increased incidence of female BC in the Taiwanese population.

Abstract

Background: The incidence of female BC among the Eastern and Southeastern Asian populations has gradually increased in recent years. However, epidemiological studies on the relationship between a sedentary lifestyle and female BC are insufficient. In order to determine the association between this lifestyle and the incidence of female BC, we conducted a population-based cohort study on women in Taiwan. Methods: We followed a prospective cohort of 5879 women aged 30 years and over enrolled in the 2001 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), who developed female BC over a period of 72,453 person years, and we estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: RFs associated with female BC incidence included parity (adjusted HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44–0.91), body mass index (adjusted HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04–1.71), and ≥3 h/day spent sitting (adjusted HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.08–3.32). The incidence of female BC in participants who sat for ≥3 h/day and consumed sugary drinks was 2.5 times greater than that in those who sat for <3 h/day and did not consume sugary drinks (adjusted HR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.01–6.23). Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that sedentary behavior and sugary drink intake may increase the risk of developing female BC. These are modifiable RFs; therefore, a healthy lifestyle and diet can reduce the incidence of female BC.

1. Introduction

As of 2018, female BC was the second most frequent type of cancer worldwide and was one of the major threats to life and causes of death in women [1]. Nevertheless, the incidence of BC in women varies greatly between different regions around the world. Generally, the incidence is highest in developed countries, but its incidence has plateaued and has even fallen since 2000. However, female BC is becoming more common in low-incidence regions of Asia [2,3]. Cancer negatively affects the quality of life of patients and their families. However, the recent rapid increase in the incidence of female BC has posed a major new public health challenge. It has even affected the entire healthcare system and has led to an increased economic burden. The current public health response to female BC is to reduce risks, such as improving modifiable RFs to prevent female BC [3].
There are many modifiable RFs that contribute to female BC [4]. One study estimated the population-attributable risk percentage for the risk of female BC, including obesity (10%), a lack of physical activity (3%), a high alcohol intake (3%), oral contraceptive use (3%), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (7%), and delayed first birth (1%). All of these reproductive factors and lifestyles are modifiable [5]. In addition, previous studies have suggested that age is the most primary RF for female BC. Female BC incidence increases with age, doubling approximately every decade before menopause but dropping rapidly after menopause. However, the curve in some countries tends to be flat [4,6]. As the parity increases, women’s risk of BC decreases significantly (trend p = 0.01) [7]. The older the age of menopause onset, the greater the risk of Japanese women developing BC (trend p = 0.02) [8]. Those who recently received HRT are more likely to develop female BC (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.58–1.75) [9]. Compared with no alcohol consumption, each 10 g/day increase in alcohol intake increased the HR for female BC by 4.2% (95% CI: 2.7–5.8) [10]. Smokers have an increased risk of 16% (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.00–1.34) [11]. Each additional unit of saturated fat consumption increases the risk by 20% (HR = 1.2; 95% CI: 1.20–1.21) [12]. Higher BMI positively correlates with risk of female BC (adjusted HR = 0.78, 1.19, 1.31, 1.53, and 1.65; 95% CI: 0.63–0.96, 1.12–1.27, 1.21–1.41, 1.38–1.71, and 1.27–2.13 for BMIs of 18.5, 24–26.9, 27–29.9, 30–34.9 and ≥35 kg/m2, respectively) [13]. A higher total current physical activity level negatively correlates with risk of female BC (trend p = 0.03) [14].
Recently, a new scope of epidemiology studies has focused on the association between a sedentary lifestyle and cancer. Sedentary behavior means prolonged sitting or reclining, which reduces energy expenditure. It is different from the lack of health-enhancing physical activity. One may meet the recommendations of recreational physical activity but still spend a long time sitting. A systematic review suggests that a sedentary lifestyle may increase cancer risk through factors such as adiposity and metabolic dysfunction [15]. A nested case–control study was conducted to examine the difference between the causes of female BC in Asia and the known RFs in Western countries. The results showed that prior history of breast disease (OR = 2.47; 95% CI: 2.26–2.71), obesity (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.04–1.96), hypertension (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05–1.25), and some estrogen-related factors may increase the risk of female BC [16]. Thus, our aim was to conduct a population-based cohort study to explore the association between lifestyle and rapid increase in female BC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort and Baseline Characteristics

This study involved female participants from the previous 2001 NHIS cohort [17]. The NHIS is a national cross-sectional study that uses a multi-stage stratified sampling method to collect a sample representative of the Taiwanese population. Interviewers were trained in standardized interview procedures and then conducted face-to-face questionnaire interviews [18]. Briefly, a total of 5911 women (see Figure 1) aged 30 years and over who agreed to link to the health insurance database were included in this study. Those who had a catastrophic illness card (NHIRD’s Registry for Catastrophic Illness Database: ICD, 9th Revision, code 174) prior to the study were excluded. Thus, after exclusion, a total of 5879 women aged 30 years and above were included in this study.
In this study, we focused on reproductive factors, lifestyle, and obesity that are potentially associated with female BC. Information on demographic variables, reproductive factors (parity or number of childbirths and hormone therapy), lifestyle (alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, exercise, time spent sitting, sugary drink intake, meat intake, fruit intake, and vegetable intake), and disease history were derived from a structured questionnaire interview. We converted height and weight into BMI. Those aged over 55 years were considered postmenopausal [19,20]. Exercise refers to any form of exercise performed in the past two weeks. Sedentary time is the average number of hours per day that the participant answered for sitting (besides sleeping), including working, reading, watching TV, and using the computer. Dietary pattern is the consumption frequency of the listed foods in a week: Almost every day, 3–5 times per week, 1–2 times per week, <1 time per week, and none.

2.2. Follow-Up and Determination of Female Breast Cancer

We followed the cancer and survival status of the study subjects by using data to link health profiles in the NHIRD’s Registry for Catastrophic Illness and National Cause of Death Registry (NCDR) in Taiwan. The National Health Insurance (NHI) program has been established in Taiwan since 1995. It has nationally insured rates of more than 99% (by 2017, 23.88 million people were insured) [21,22,23]. The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) provides, in electronic format, all medical benefit data of NHI beneficiaries during the insurance cancelation period. The NHIRD’s Registry for Catastrophic Illness includes a list of 30 types of illnesses that require long-term care, including cancer. A panel of specific disease experts reviews the original charts, images, and pathology reports of patients who have applied for the catastrophic illness certificate, and the panel verifies the diagnosis [24,25]. In Taiwan, all death certificates issued by doctors must be input into the NCDR database. The cause of death data only provide the main cause of death and the date of death of all the citizens recorded in the NCDR. Previous studies have indicated that the overall agreement rate of the determination of death for malignant neoplasms between reviewers and coders is more than 90% (kappa = 0.94) [26].
All eligible subjects were followed from the enrollment date selected for this study until the onset of cancer, death of any cause, or the end of the follow-up date (31 December 2014), whichever was the earliest. Individuals until the defined follow-up endpoint with a history or subsequent diagnosis of any cancer except female BC were not excluded. The cancer occurrence in our analysis was defined as the incidence of female BC (ICD, 9th Revision, code 174) as a primary diagnosis.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

We calculated the follow-up time for each individual from the date of enrollment until the earliest date of newly diagnosed female BC, death, or last follow-up. From using the life table method, we derived the cumulative incidence of female BC for each year of follow-up among subjects based on time spent sitting (T) and sugary drink intake (S) at the time of enrollment. We used the Cox proportional hazard model to identify the relative risk and its 95% CI between RFs and female BC, while presenting the visualization results as the forest plot in Table 1. In order to ensure tightly controlled potential confounding effects, we controlled for age as a continuous variable in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. A two-tailed test was used for all Cox regression analyses, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were conducted using version 9.4 of the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and version 12.0 of STATA (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

A total of 5879 women aged 30 and above were included in this study. As shown in Table 2, the average age at enrollment was 49.74 ± 13.91 years; 26.6% lived in Taipei, New Taipei, and Keelung; 30% lived in Taoyuan–Hsinchu–Miaoli/Taichung–Changhua–Nantou; 43.4% lived in other areas; 48.5% had an education level of elementary school and under; 14.8% had an education level of junior high school; and 36.7% had an education level of senior high school and above. The majority of subjects were married (76%), 14% were widowed, and 10% had another relationship status; 25% had a household monthly income of USD 1000 or less, 43% had a monthly household income of USD 1001–2333, and 32% had a monthly household income of USD 2334 or more.
In Table 1, the univariate analysis results show that parity (≥4 children vs. nulliparous, crude HR = 0.41 (95% CI: 0.19–0.89), or per-unit increase crude HR = 0.84 (0.74–0.96), BMI (≥27 kg/m2 vs. <24 kg/m2; crude HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.09–2.88), and time spent sitting (≥3 h/day vs. 0–2.9 h/day; crude HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.17–3.57) were significantly associated with female BC. Alcohol intake (crude HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24–1.01) and sugary drink intake (crude HR = 1.45; 95% CI: 0.96–2.19) were marginally associated with female BC. Therefore, we included the above variables and age in the multivariate analysis. When adjusted for multiple comparisons, parity (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44–0.91), BMI (HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04–1.71), and time spent sitting (≥3 h/day vs. 0–2.9 h/day; HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.08–3.32) were statistically significantly associated with female BC (Table 3).
Additionally, we assessed the association between time spent sitting and sugary drink intake combined and female BC incidence, as shown in Table 4. After adjusting for age, parity, and BMI, the risk of female BC was positively associated with sitting for ≥3 h/day and consuming sugary drinks (vs. women who sit for 0–2.9 h/day and do not consume sugary drinks; adjusted HR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.01–6.23).
We followed up 5879 women aged ≥30 years for 72,453 person-years. The incidence of female BC was 154.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 127.9–185.3). The median of the follow-up period was 13.25 years. The average age upon diagnosis of female BC was 55.82 ± 10.95 years. During the observation period, the Nelson–Aalen estimate of the cumulative incidence of female BC was 0.1% in one year, 0.3% in three years, 0.8% in five years, and 1.5% in 10 years. The cumulative incidence regarding the time spent sitting ≥3 h/day and sugary drink intake group was significantly higher than that in the time spent sitting 0–2.9 h/day and no sugary drink intake group (log-rank test p = 0.027; Figure 2).

4. Discussion

This research comprised a population-based cohort study on 5879 Taiwanese women aged 30 years and above. During the 13-year, 72,453 person-year median follow-up, there were 112 new cases of female BC, with an incidence rate of 154.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 127.9–185.3). The mean age of diagnosis of female BC was 55.82 years, which is similar to the nationwide age of female BC diagnosis (median = 54 years [27]). In our cohort study, the incidence of BC among Taiwanese women was higher than that in a neighboring Asian country, Japan (78 per 100,000 person-years) [28], but lower than that in European and North American countries (339, 232, 355, and 344 per 100,000 person-years in Denmark, the United Kingdom, the United States, and France, respectively) [29,30,31,32]. After adjusting for multiple RFs, the risks associated with female BC were parity (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44–0.91), BMI (HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.04–1.71), and sedentary time (HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.08–3.32). Women who sit for ≥3 h/day and consume sugary drinks have a significantly higher risk of developing BC than those who sit for <3 h/day and do not consume sugary drinks (adjusted HR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.01–6.23). This study has several advantages, including its prospective design, long-term follow-up, and nationally representative study population. This study had a sufficient sample size and follow-up period to evaluate the correlation between female BC and the combination of sedentary time and sugary drink intake. Since this cohort includes only Taiwanese women, some studies showed that there may be ethnic differences in the etiology and biology of BC between Asians and non-Asians [33]. In Taiwan, the younger female BC is characterized by a higher prevalence of luminal A subtype and a lower prevalence of basal-like subtype, unlike in Western countries [34]. Therefore, the results of this study are not applicable to the Western female population.
In our study, sedentary time was the most important predictor of female BC risk. However, there are not many studies that have evaluated the association between sedentary time and the development of female BC. The findings from existing cohort studies have provided little support for such an association. One study found a significantly increased risk of BC with increasing sedentary time (≥12 vs. <5.5 h/day OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.01–3.70) in White women [35], whereas another study reported an association between sedentary time and female BC (≥10 vs. <5 h/day HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.06–1.53) in African-American women [36]. Nonetheless, a study of American women did not support the association, especially for postmenopausal women (sedentary time ≥10 vs. ≤5 h/day HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.92–1.09) [37]. There are three recent studies that associated time spent watching TV with breast cancer. One study indicated that there is a borderline significant (trend p = 0.053) in the time spent watching TV to increase the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women [38]. Another study found a lower risk of developing breast cancer in UK women with less time spent watching TV (≤1 vs. 1– ≤ 3 h/day HR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85–0.996) [39]. The other study reported an increased risk of breast cancer in Spanish women who watch >2 h/day of TV compared to <1 h (HR = 1.67; 95% CI:1.03–2.72) [40]. Sedentary behavior has been increasing in modern life. In recent years, the effect of sedentary lifestyle on health has drawn public attention [41]. Sedentary behavior may be related to several potential biological mechanisms, such as insulin resistance, obesity, and chronic inflammation, and is considered to play a role in the development of female BC [15,42,43,44]. Sedentary behavior includes prolonged sitting or reclining, which reduces energy expenditure, causing weight gain and obesity [42,45]. It can affect female BC development through adiposity-related pathways [15,44,46]. However, it can also be an independent RF for female BC [43,47]. Sedentary behavior also increases the insulin response to glucose loading [48]. In a bed rest study, it was proven that an increase in sedentary time can cause a series of harmful metabolic effects, such as a significant decrease in systemic insulin sensitivity [49]. Other proposed biological mechanisms for sedentary behavior include the reduction in vitamin D levels [50,51] and an imbalance in sex hormones [52,53].
In a recent French cohort study, it was reported that the consumption of SSB is positively associated with female BC (HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.07–1.39) [54]. Two other cohort studies pointed out that the consumption of SSB can increase the postmenopausal risk for women. The incidence of BC in postmenopausal women was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03–1.43) times more for those who consume between one and six sugar-sweetened soft drinks per week relative to those who consume less than one per month in an Australian cohort study [55]. A Spanish cohort study showed that BC incidence in postmenopausal women who regularly consume sugary drinks is 2.12 (95% CI: 1.02–4.41) times higher than in those who never or rarely consume sugary drinks [56]. One systematic review indicated that each serving per day increase in sugary drinks is associated with a weight gain of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09–0.34) kg per year. Carbonated beverages, soda, sweetened beverages, fruit drinks, and sports drinks may result in excess energy intake, causing obesity [57]. In addition, one study using a U.S. cohort found that, with adjustments including a change in weight, SSB consumption frequency was classified as none to less than one serving per month, one serving per month to less than one serving per week, one serving per week to one serving per day, and greater than or equal to one serving per day. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume increased by 658, 649, 707, and 852 cm3 (95% CI: 602–713, 582–716, 657–757, and 760–943) (trend p < 0.001), respectively, indicating that SSBs may lead to an increase in VAT but not weight [58]. One hospital-based case–control study found that a higher visceral adiposity index (VAI ≥1.72) (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.17–3.13) is associated with female BC, indicating that visceral adipose tissue accumulation increases the incidence of female BC [59].
Sedentary behavior and sugary drink intake combined are significantly positively associated with female BC. This study assessed sedentary behavior based on self-reported questionnaires regarding the total time spent sitting in a day, including working, watching TV, and using the computer. This study’s prospective design helped to reduce the effect of recall bias. However, it is limited by not using an objective measurement method to determine time spent sitting, and we did not collect more detailed information about sedentary behavior. A recent study suggested that sedentary time patterns may affect health outcomes more than total time spent sitting [60].
This study adopted a prospective design; therefore, reverse causality bias resulting from pre-existing conditions is not likely to occur, which is one of the main strengths of this study. Moreover, the subjects of our study were recruited from a nationwide sample of Taiwanese residents, enabling us to provide risk assessments and prevention strategies for female BC in Taiwanese. The quality of the NHIRD’s Registry for Catastrophic Illness ensures the accuracy and completeness of our results in identifying incident cancer cases [23,24]. The first limitation in the current study is the small number of female BC cases. The power of the test is slightly insufficient, such as for smoking and exercise, which need to be verified in future studies with large samples. Consequently, the significant results observed in this study may be by chance. Despite that, the number of incident cases was low, the large number of subjects in the reference group allowed for the estimation to have sufficient precision. Second, our results were based on a single measurement of time spent sitting and sugary drink intake and other RFs only at baseline. Because of the limitations of not using an objective measurement method (such as accelerometry) to determine the time spent sitting, we did not collect more detailed information about sedentary behavior. We also did not assess weight gain or lifestyle changes over the follow-up period. Third, given the strong negative correlation between breastfeeding and the risk of female BC, we did not consider the duration of estrogen interruption to calculate lifetime exposure parity for endogenous estrogen. Therefore, the risk associated with estrogen exposure may have been underestimated in our study. Lastly, due to the low number of incident cases, we had to consider female BC cases as a whole, rather than dividing them into histological subtypes for analysis. The potential for heterogeneity in female BC associated with RFs could not be inspected in this study.

5. Conclusions

Our findings provide evidence that other RFs, such as parity, BMI, and time spent sitting, may also be implicated in female BC. In contrast, time spent sitting was the dominant predictor of female BC risk in the study cohort. Our data also indicate that time spent sitting combined with sugary drink intake may be a modifiable RF for female BC. Since time spent sitting and sugary drink intake are modifiable factors in managing health, the findings of this study support the recommendation for specific lifestyle modifications to reduce the risk of female BC.

Author Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Y.-C.W., C.-H.L. and T.-S.L.; acquisition of data: T.-S.L.; analysis and interpretation of the results: C.-H.L., S.-P.H. and M.C.; draft manuscript preparation: Y.-C.W., M.C. and T.-S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Fu Jen Catholic University Institutional Review Board (IRB no: C105015, C107184).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to this study using a claims database with encrypted personal identities, and the IRB exempted the study from review.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available in accordance with the policy of the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 2 September 2019).
  2. Fitzmaurice, C.; Dicker, D.; Pain, A.; Hamavid, H.; Moradi-Lakeh, M.; MacIntyre, M.F.; Allen, C.; Hansen, G.; Woodbrook, R.; Wolfe, C.; et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 505–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Golubnitschaja, O.; Debald, M.; Yeghiazaryan, K.; Kuhn, W.; Pesta, M.; Costigliola, V.; Grech, G. Breast cancer epidemic in the early twenty-first century: Evaluation of risk factors, cumulative questionnaires and recommendations for preventive measures. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 12941–12957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stuckey, A. Breast cancer: Epidemiology and risk factors. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 54, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayes, J.; Richardson, A.; Frampton, C. Population attributable risks for modifiable lifestyle factors and breast cancer in New Zealand women. Intern. Med. J. 2013, 43, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McPherson, K.; Steel, C.M.; Dixon, J.M. ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 2000, 321, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Tamakoshi, K.; Yatsuya, H.; Wakai, K.; Suzuki, S.; Nishio, K.; Lin, Y.; Niwa, Y.; Kondo, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Tokudome, S.; et al. Impact of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk in Japan: Results of the JACC study. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawai, M.; Minami, Y.; Kuriyama, S.; Kakizaki, M.; Kakugawa, Y.; Nishino, Y.; Ishida, T.; Fukao, A.; Tsuji, I.; Ohuchi, N. Reproductive factors, exogenous female hormone use and breast cancer risk in Japanese: The Miyagi Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beral, V.; Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003, 362, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Romieu, I.; Scoccianti, C.; Chajes, V.; de Batlle, J.; Biessy, C.; Dossus, L.; Baglietto, L.; Clavel-Chapelon, F.; Overvad, K.; Olsen, A.; et al. Alcohol intake and breast cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 1921–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Luo, J.; Margolis, K.L.; Wactawski-Wende, J.; Horn, K.; Messina, C.; Stefanick, M.L.; Tindle, H.A.; Tong, E.; Rohan, T.E. Association of active and passive smoking with risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women: A prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011, 342, d1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sieri, S.; Krogh, V.; Ferrari, P.; Berrino, F.; Pala, V.; Thiebaut, A.C.; Tjonneland, A.; Olsen, A.; Overvad, K.; Jakobsen, M.U.; et al. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 1304–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, M.J.; Wu, W.Y.; Yen, A.M.; Fann, J.C.; Chen, S.L.; Chiu, S.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Chiou, S.T. Body mass index and breast cancer: Analysis of a nation-wide population-based prospective cohort study on 1,393,985 Taiwanese women. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. McTiernan, A.; Kooperberg, C.; White, E.; Wilcox, S.; Coates, R.; Adams-Campbell, L.L.; Woods, N.; Ockene, J.; Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study. Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: The Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study. JAMA 2003, 290, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lynch, B.M. Sedentary behavior and cancer: A systematic review of the literature and proposed biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 2691–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chuang, S.C.; Wu, G.J.; Lu, Y.S.; Lin, C.H.; Hsiung, C.A. Associations between Medical Conditions and Breast Cancer Risk in Asians: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, H.Y.; Chiou, C.J.; Lin, M.C.; Lin, S.H.; Tai, T.Y. A population study of the self-care behaviors and their associated factors of diabetes in Taiwan: Results from the 2001 National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan. Prev. Med. 2005, 40, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Health Promotion Administration. National Health Interview Survey. Taiwan. Available online: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=106 (accessed on 22 January 2021).
  19. Stanford, J.L.; Hartge, P.; Brinton, L.A.; Hoover, R.N.; Brookmeyer, R. Factors influencing the age at natural menopause. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.Y.; Shih, S.R.; Huang, K.C. Increasing risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. J. Diabetes Investig. 2020, 11, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wu, T.Y.; Majeed, A.; Kuo, K.N. An overview of the healthcare system in Taiwan. Lond. J. Prim. Care 2010, 3, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Cheng, T.M. Reflections on the 20th anniversary of Taiwan’s single-payer National Health Insurance System. Health Aff. 2015, 34, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. National Health Insurance Administration. National Health Insurance Annual Report 2017–2018; Ministry of Health and Welfare: Taipei, Taiwan, 2017.
  24. Lin, T.T.; Yang, Y.H.; Liao, M.T.; Tsai, C.T.; Hwang, J.J.; Chiang, F.T.; Chen, P.C.; Lin, J.L.; Lin, L.Y. Primary prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Kidney Int. 2015, 88, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu, T.M.; Chuang, Y.W.; Yu, M.C.; Chen, C.H.; Yang, C.K.; Huang, S.T.; Lin, C.L.; Shu, K.H.; Kao, C.H. Risk of cancer in patients with polycystic kidney disease: A propensity-score matched analysis of a nationwide, population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, T.H.; Lee, M.C.; Chou, M.C. Accuracy of cause-of-death coding in Taiwan: Types of miscoding and effects on mortality statistics. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 29, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Health Promotion Administration. Cancer Registry Annual Report. Taiwan. 2014. Available online: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=~/File/Attach/7330/File_6792.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  28. Nishio, K.; Niwa, Y.; Toyoshima, H.; Tamakoshi, K.; Kondo, T.; Yatsuya, H.; Yamamoto, A.; Suzuki, S.; Tokudome, S.; Lin, Y.; et al. Consumption of soy foods and the risk of breast cancer: Findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study. Cancer Causes Control 2007, 18, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Andersen, Z.J.; Jorgensen, J.T.; Gron, R.; Brauner, E.V.; Lynge, E. Active smoking and risk of breast cancer in a Danish nurse cohort study. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jones, M.E.; Schoemaker, M.J.; McFadden, E.C.; Wright, L.B.; Johns, L.E.; Swerdlow, A.J. Night shift work and risk of breast cancer in women: The Generations Study cohort. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gram, I.T.; Park, S.Y.; Maskarinec, G.; Wilkens, L.R.; Haiman, C.A.; Le Marchand, L. Smoking and breast cancer risk by race/ethnicity and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status: The Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Veron, L.; Gelot, A.; Gusto, G.; Arveux, P.; Delaloge, S.; Boutron-Ruault, M.C. Modifiable risk factors for advanced vs. early breast cancer in the French E3N cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 850–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, C.-H.; Yap, Y.S.; Lee, K.-H.; Im, S.-A.; Naito, Y.; Yeo, W.; Ueno, T.; Kwong, A.; Li, H.; Huang, S.-M.; et al. Contrasting Epidemiology and Clinicopathology of Female Breast Cancer in Asians vs the US Population. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019, 111, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, C.H.; Liau, J.Y.; Lu, Y.S.; Huang, C.S.; Lee, W.C.; Kuo, K.T.; Shen, Y.C.; Kuo, S.H.; Lan, C.; Liu, J.M.; et al. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer emerging in young women in Taiwan: Evidence for more than just westernization as a reason for the disease in Asia. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 1807–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cohen, S.S.; Matthews, C.E.; Bradshaw, P.T.; Lipworth, L.; Buchowski, M.S.; Signorello, L.B.; Blot, W.J. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and likelihood of breast cancer among Black and White women: A report from the Southern Community Cohort Study. Cancer Prev. Res. 2013, 6, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nomura, S.J.; Dash, C.; Rosenberg, L.; Palmer, J.; Adams-Campbell, L.L. Sedentary time and breast cancer incidence in African American women. Cancer Causes Control 2016, 27, 1239–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nomura, S.J.O.; Dash, C.; Sheppard, V.B.; Bowen, D.; Allison, M.; Barrington, W.; Chlebowski, R.; Coday, M.; Hou, L.; Howard, B.; et al. Sedentary time and postmenopausal breast cancer incidence. Cancer Causes Control CCC 2017, 28, 1405–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cao, J.; Eshak, E.S.; Liu, K.; Muraki, I.; Cui, R.; Iso, H.; Tamakoshi, A. Television Viewing Time and Breast Cancer Incidence for Japanese Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: The JACC Study. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 51, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hunter, R.F.; Murray, J.M.; Coleman, H.G. The association between recreational screen time and cancer risk: Findings from the UK Biobank, a large prospective cohort study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sanchez-Bayona, R.; Gardeazabal, I.; Romanos-Nanclares, A.; Fernandez-Lazaro, C.I.; Alvarez-Alvarez, I.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Gea, A.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Santisteban, M.; Toledo, E. Leisure-time physical activity, sedentary behavior, and risk of breast cancer: Results from the SUN (‘Seguimiento Universidad De Navarra’) project. Prev. Med. 2021, 148, 106535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, Y.; Zhao, H.; Peng, C. Association of sedentary behavior with the risk of breast cancer in women: Update meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann. Epidemiol. 2015, 25, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Friedenreich, C.; Lynch, B. Can living a less sedentary life decrease breast cancer risk in women? Women’s Health 2012, 8, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lynch, B.M.; Friedenreich, C.M.; Winkler, E.A.; Healy, G.N.; Vallance, J.K.; Eakin, E.G.; Owen, N. Associations of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time with biomarkers of breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: Findings from NHANES (2003–2006). Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 130, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wiseman, A.J.; Lynch, B.M.; Cameron, A.J.; Dunstan, D.W. Associations of change in television viewing time with biomarkers of postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Cancer Causes Control 2014, 25, 1309–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Owen, N.; Healy, G.N.; Matthews, C.E.; Dunstan, D.W. Too much sitting: The population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2010, 38, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Reeves, G.K.; Pirie, K.; Beral, V.; Green, J.; Spencer, E.; Bull, D.; Million Women Study, C. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: Cohort study. BMJ 2007, 335, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kerr, J.; Anderson, C.; Lippman, S.M. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and cancer: An update and emerging new evidence. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, e457–e471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hamburg, N.M.; McMackin, C.J.; Huang, A.L.; Shenouda, S.M.; Widlansky, M.E.; Schulz, E.; Gokce, N.; Ruderman, N.B.; Keaney, J.F., Jr.; Vita, J.A. Physical inactivity rapidly induces insulin resistance and microvascular dysfunction in healthy volunteers. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 2650–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Alibegovic, A.C.; Hojbjerre, L.; Sonne, M.P.; van Hall, G.; Stallknecht, B.; Dela, F.; Vaag, A. Impact of 9 days of bed rest on hepatic and peripheral insulin action, insulin secretion, and whole-body lipolysis in healthy young male offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kumar, J.; Muntner, P.; Kaskel, F.J.; Hailpern, S.M.; Melamed, M.L. Prevalence and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in US children: NHANES 2001–2004. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e362–e370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. McCullough, M.L.; Rodriguez, C.; Diver, W.R.; Feigelson, H.S.; Stevens, V.L.; Thun, M.J.; Calle, E.E. Dairy, calcium, and vitamin D intake and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 2898–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Tamimi, R.M.; Byrne, C.; Colditz, G.A.; Hankinson, S.E. Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Monninkhof, E.M.; Peeters, P.H.; Schuit, A.J. Design of the sex hormones and physical exercise (SHAPE) study. BMC Public Health 2007, 7, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chazelas, E.; Srour, B.; Desmetz, E.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Julia, C.; Deschamps, V.; Druesne-Pecollo, N.; Galan, P.; Hercberg, S.; Latino-Martel, P.; et al. Sugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: Results from NutriNet-Sante prospective cohort. BMJ 2019, 366, l2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hodge, A.M.; Bassett, J.K.; Milne, R.L.; English, D.R.; Giles, G.G. Consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and risk of obesity-related cancers. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Romanos-Nanclares, A.; Toledo, E.; Gardeazabal, I.; Jimenez-Moleon, J.J.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Gea, A. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and incidence of breast cancer: The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) Project. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 2875–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Malik, V.S.; Pan, A.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 1084–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ma, J.; McKeown, N.M.; Hwang, S.J.; Hoffmann, U.; Jacques, P.F.; Fox, C.S. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Is Associated With Change of Visceral Adipose Tissue Over 6 Years of Follow-Up. Circulation 2016, 133, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Godinho-Mota, J.C.M.; Martins, K.A.; Vaz-Goncalves, L.; Mota, J.F.; Soares, L.R.; Freitas-Junior, R. Visceral adiposity increases the risk of breast cancer: A case-control study. Nutr. Hosp. 2018, 35, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Matthews, C.E.; Keadle, S.K.; Troiano, R.P.; Kahle, L.; Koster, A.; Brychta, R.; van Domelen, D.; Caserotti, P.; Chen, K.Y.; Harris, T.B.; et al. Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 14 00788 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart for selecting the study participants.
Figure 1. Flow chart for selecting the study participants.
Cancers 14 00788 g001
Cancers 14 00788 g002 550
Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of female breast cancer based on time spent sitting (T) and sugary drink intake (S).
Figure 2. Cumulative incidence of female breast cancer based on time spent sitting (T) and sugary drink intake (S).
Cancers 14 00788 g002
Table
Table 1. Risk factors associated with the incidence of female breast cancer.
Table 1. Risk factors associated with the incidence of female breast cancer.
VariablesItems Cases/Person-Years95% CI of HR 1HR 1 (95% CI)p
HypertensionNo9563,428 Cancers 14 00788 i001Referent
Yes1790261.14(0.63–2.05)0.669
DiabetesNo10469,133Referent
Yes833201.58(0.75–3.32)0.230
HyperlipidemiaNo10569,571Referent
Yes728821.57(0.72–3.43)0.262
ParityContinuous 0.84(0.74–0.96)0.009
Nulliparous125776Referent
1–3 children7545,3310.74(0.40–1.37)0.341
≥4 children2521,3460.41(0.19–0.89)0.024
p for trend 0.013
Hormone therapyNo9866,187Referent
Yes1462671.48(0.84–2.62)0.173
PostmenopauseNo8052,546Referent
Yes3219,9070.90(0.43–1.90)0.784
Body mass indexContinuous 1.03(0.98–1.08)0.278
<24 kg/m25540,029Referent
≥24 to <27 kg/m23322,6791.03(0.66–1.62)0.882
≥27 kg/m22497451.77(1.09–2.87)0.020
p for trend 0.044
Alcohol intakeNo10462,533Referent
Yes899210.49(0.24–1.01)0.052
SmokingNo10567,225Referent
Yes752280.87(0.40–1.87)0.717
ExerciseNo5036,295Referent
Yes6236,1581.23(0.85–1.79)0.269
Time spent sittingContinuous 1.03(0.98–1.09)0.229
0–2.9 h/day1416,291Referent
≥3 h/day9856,1622.04(1.17–3.57)0.013
Sugary drink intakeNo3326,726Referent
Yes7945,7281.45(0.96–2.19)0.080
Meat intakeAlmost every day4328,407Referent
1–5 times per week5234,6930.99(0.66–1.48)0.941
<1 time per week1793531.17(0.66–2.08)0.584
p for trend 0.688
Vegetable intakeAlmost every day9963,665Referent
3–5 times per week966420.87(0.44–1.73)0.697
≤2 times per week421461.20(0.44–3.26)0.724
p for trend 0.981
Fruit intakeAlmost every day7546,777Referent
3–5 times per week1813,6780.82(0.49–1.38)0.460
≤2 times per week1911,9990.98(0.59–1.63)0.939
p for trend 0.765
1 Adjusted for age in the Cox proportional hazards regression.
Table
Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the women aged ≥30 years included in this study (n = 5879).
Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the women aged ≥30 years included in this study (n = 5879).
Variable Groupn(%)
Age (years)
30–391724(29.3)
40–542334(39.7)
≥551821(31.0)
Continuous
(mean ± standard deviation)		49.73 ± 13.91
Area
Taipei, New Taipei, Keelung1561(26.6)
Taoyuan–Hsinchu–Miaoli, Taichung–Changhua–Nantou1765(30.0)
Other2553(43.4)
Education
Elementary school and under2849(48.5)
Junior high school870(14.8)
Senior high school and above2160(36.7)
Marital status
Married4464(75.9)
Widowed809(13.8)
Other606(10.3)
Household monthly income
USD ≤10001475(25.1)
USD 1001–23332525(42.9)
USD ≥23341879(32.0)
Table
Table 3. Multivariate analysis for female breast cancer incidence.
Table 3. Multivariate analysis for female breast cancer incidence.
VariablesHR 1 (95% CI)p
Age (years)1.01(1.00, 1.03)0.111
Parity (ordinal)0.63(0.44, 0.91)0.013
Body mass index (ordinal)1.34(1.04, 1.71)0.022
Alcohol intake0.50(0.24, 1.02)0.056
Time spent sitting ≥3 h/day1.89(1.08, 3.32)0.026
Sugary drink intake1.46(0.96, 2.21)0.074
1 Cox proportional hazards regression covariates: age, parity (nulliparous, 1–3 children, ≥4 children), body mass index (<24, ≥24 to <27, ≥27 kg/m2), alcohol intake (yes/no), time spent sitting ≥3 h/day (yes/no), and sugary drink intake (yes/no).
Table
Table 4. Combined effects of time spent sitting and sugary drink intake on the incidence of female breast cancer.
Table 4. Combined effects of time spent sitting and sugary drink intake on the incidence of female breast cancer.
Time Spent Sitting ≥3 h/daySugary Drink IntakeHR 1 (95% CI)p
NoNoReferent
NoYes1.22(0.41, 3.64)0.726
YesNo1.69(0.65, 4.37)0.282
YesYes2.51(1.01, 6.23)0.048
1 Cox proportional hazards regression, covariates: Age, parity (ordinal) (nulliparous, 1–3 children, and ≥4 children), body mass index (ordinal) (<24, ≥24 to <27, and ≥27 kg/m2).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; Huang, S.-P.; Chen, M.; Lee, T.-S. Risk Factors for Female Breast Cancer: A Population Cohort Study. Cancers 2022, 14, 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030788

AMA Style

Wang Y-C, Lin C-H, Huang S-P, Chen M, Lee T-S. Risk Factors for Female Breast Cancer: A Population Cohort Study. Cancers. 2022; 14(3):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yu-Chiao, Ching-Hung Lin, Shih-Pei Huang, Mingchih Chen, and Tian-Shyug Lee. 2022. "Risk Factors for Female Breast Cancer: A Population Cohort Study" Cancers 14, no. 3: 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop