Next Article in Journal
ADC Values of Cytologically Benign and Cytologically Malignant 18 F-FDG PET-Positive Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Challenges of Diclofenac-Based Novel Therapeutics: Targeting Cancer and Complex Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
DWI Metrics Differentiating Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms from Invasive Pancreatic Cancer: A Study in GEM Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tumour Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenging Target to Blunt Tumour Immune Evasion

by
Tatiana Lopatina
*,
Alessandro Sarcinella
and
Maria Felice Brizzi
Department of Medical Sciences, Turin University, 10126 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 4020; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164020
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 20 August 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Tumour onset and development occur because of specific immune support. The immune system, which is originally able to perceive and eliminate incipient cancer cells, becomes suppressed and hijacked by cancer. For these purposes, tumour cells use extracellular vesicles (TEVs). Specific molecular composition allows TEVs to reprogram immune cells towards tumour tolerance. Circulating TEVs move from their site of origin to other organs, preparing “a fertile soil” for metastasis formation. This implies that TEV molecular content can provide a valuable tool for cancer biomarker discovery and potential targets to reshape the immune system into tumour recognition and eradication.

Abstract

Control of the immune response is crucial for tumour onset and progression. Tumour cells handle the immune reaction by means of secreted factors and extracellular vesicles (EV). Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (TEV) play key roles in immune reprogramming by delivering their cargo to different immune cells. Tumour-surrounding tissues also contribute to tumour immune editing and evasion, tumour progression, and drug resistance via locally released TEV. Moreover, the increase in circulating TEV has suggested their underpinning role in tumour dissemination. This review brings together data referring to TEV-driven immune regulation and antitumour immune suppression. Attention was also dedicated to TEV-mediated drug resistance.

1. Introduction

Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (TEV), are small membrane vesicles carrying a specific set of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids designed to spreading tumour signals and establishing a favouring tumour microenvironment (TME). It was widely reported that TEV from different cancers regulate the immune system by acting on different cell types. Moreover, TEV express markers of the original tumour cell, thereby representing non-invasive circulating cancer biomarkers [1,2]. Since the immune reaction plays a permissive role in tumour growth and metastasis, the switch of the immune program from anticancer to tumour tolerance has generated great interest.
The anticancer immune defence is mainly based on tumour-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) [3,4,5]. CTL differentiation occurs in secondary lymphoid organs once naive T-cells undergo tumour-specific stimulation from antigen-presenting cells (APC). APC are mainly represented by dendritic cells (DC), but also macrophages, B-cells and others [6,7]. The maturation/activation state of APC dictates naive T-cell fate: effector CTL or exhausted T-cells granting tolerance. It was shown that TEV are primarily internalised by APC, thereby suggesting that TEV regulate the immune response via APC reprogramming. In this review, data on tumour immune editing mediated by TEV released from cancer cells and tumour-associated cells are discussed.

2. TEV and CTL Reprogramming

In healthy subjects, differentiated tumour-specific effector CTL enter the circulation, infiltrate the tumour, and attack tumour cells by interacting with a specific tumour antigen. CTL cytotoxicity is mediated by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, perforin and granzymes, or by direct contact with apoptosis-inducing molecules expressed by tumour cells [8,9]. Tumour antigen presentation by APC is crucial for CTL differentiation, while insufficient to sustain the cytotoxic immune response [10]. To drive specific antitumour activity, T-cells must be activated by “mature” APC. During differentiation, APC “capture” invading pathogens [11,12], neo-antigens [13], apoptotic cells [14] and EV [15]. These signals dictate APC specification towards pro-inflammatory or tolerant phenotypes, resulting in a specific T-cell commitment [16]. Since the role of DC in orchestrating the immune response has been extensively investigated, the mechanisms driving tumour tolerance described herein mainly refer to DC-mediated T-cell differentiation. The high expression of MHC, CCR7, co-stimulatory factors CD80, CD83 and CD86 identifies pro-inflammatory DC, also named “mature” DC [17,18,19]. Conversely, the low expression of these markers defines “immature” DC, which maintain the immune tolerance, suppress immune cells-mediated attack, and prevent autoimmunity. Physiologically, “immature” DC differentiation occurs during apoptosis, since apoptotic cells inhibit the expression of co-stimulatory molecules [14,20,21,22,23,24].
TEV hold endogenous tumour antigens; therefore, they can be considered for potential use in an anticancer vaccine [25]. However, they mainly act as immune suppressors. Several studies have demonstrated that in vivo TEV are mostly internalised by myeloid cells [26,27,28]. Once stimulated with TEV, DC, displaying an immature phenotype, prevent the immune attack and stimulate the expression of immune checkpoint molecules [7,27,29,30]. For example, Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA4) and Programmed cell Death protein 1 (PD-1) induce CTL anergy or promote regulatory T-cell differentiation (Treg) [31,32,33,34,35,36]. DC interact with thousands of T cells per hour [37], while their MHC+ EV can cross-activate additional T cells and amplify the “onco-message” [38,39,40]. Moreover, exhausted T cells [41], Treg [42,43] and other tumour-infiltrating immune cells release their own EV, further suppressing the immune response. Apart from tumour-infiltrating DC [44], the role of other myeloid cells (monocytes and macrophages) in tumours is extensively documented [45,46,47]. Indeed, macrophages trapping TEV can transfer their oncogenic cargo to fibroblasts and endothelial cells, resulting in cancerisation of adjacent tissue [48].
Since tumour-specific T-cell differentiation depends on the maturation state of APC, and APC are primary TEV targets, it is conceivable that TEV interaction with peripheral and tissue resident APC may be considered a driving event in tumour immune editing.

3. TEV Characterisation

Tumour cells release different subpopulations of TEV according to their biogenesis and origin: microvesicles, exosomes, apoptotic bodies and oncosomes, to name a few. Microvesicles bud directly from the plasma membrane and are 0.1–1 μm in size. Exosomes include EV with different functions, usually formed from multivesicular bodies and with a diameter ranging from 30–120 nm. Dying cells release vesicular apoptotic bodies (50 nm–2 μm) that play a role in autoimmunity [49,50,51]. In cancer, membrane shedding can also give rise to large EV, termed oncosomes (1–10 μm) [52,53]. Oncosomes transfer tumour-promoting factors as oncoproteins, oncomiRNAs and tumour DNA [54]. In this review, the term EV will refer to a mixed population of small vesicles unless otherwise stated by the studies. The EV subpopulation shares several markers, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and internal damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [55,56,57,58], involved in myeloid cell targeting and immune regulation. Herein, we describe TEV marker participation in tumour immune suppression (Figure 1 and Table 1).

3.1. Tetraspanins

Tetraspanins (CD63, CD81, CD9, etc.) organise membrane tetraspanin-enriched microdomains involving selected transmembrane and cytosolic signalling proteins [59]. The tetraspanin-mediated sorting of specific adhesion receptors may influence EV uptake. For example, the adhesion molecules ICAM-1/LFA1 are involved in EV uptake by leukocytes [60,61,62]. Moreover, tetraspanins interact with ADAM10 and ADAM17 and control their sheddase activity [63]. In the endosomal compartment, active ADAM10 and ADAM17 enriched in EV cleave preproteins to release soluble molecules, as shown for TNFα in ovarian cancer and melanoma [64]. Tetraspanins also regulate sorting of MHC I and MHC II in EV [55], thereby regulating TEV immunogenicity.
Several studies also provide evidence for the role of CD81 in the assembly of functional immunological synapses acting as T-cell co-stimulatory signals [65]. Therefore, tetraspanins, besides activating naive T-cells via the MHC complexes, also act as co-stimulatory signals.

3.2. Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs)

TLRs belong to a family of pattern recognition receptors, which play a critical role in the innate immune responses by recognising several ligands also carried by TEV [66,67]. In cancer, these ligands include PAMPs, double-stranded RNA and/or DNA [68], and internal DAMPs, as fibrinogen, nuclear and cytosolic proteins, and Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) [69,70,71,72]. TLR1-2 and TLR4-6 proteins are localised on the surface membrane, whereas TLR3 and TLR7–9 are accumulated in the endosome or lysosome compartment, as well as in the endoplasmic reticulum [73]. Immune cells, epithelial [74], endothelial [75] and tumour cells [76] express TLRs [77]. TLR stimulation by TEV activates both the innate and adaptive immune responses and induces inflammatory signals in target cells. In cancer, TLR activation triggers an intracellular cascade, resulting in NF-κβ activation and the expression of genes involved in immune suppression [8,78]. Moreover, the expression of TLRs on TEV suggests that they can bind and transfer specific ligands to target cells, further impairing the antitumour immune response [39].

3.3. Heat Shock Proteins (HSP)

HSP are involved in antiapoptotic signalling [79,80], EMT [81], tumour angiogenesis and invasion [82], as well as in drug resistance [83,84]. Immune cells express HSP receptors as TLRs, leading to TEV endocytosis, antigen cross-presentation, T-cell cross priming, and activation of the immune response. HSP90, HSP70, HSP27 are DAMPs members expressed by EV derived from cancerous [85] and non-cancerous cells. However, the number of circulating HSP70+ EV is higher in cancer patients than in healthy donors [85] and is correlated with metastases growth [86]. Proteomics revealed that TEV are enriched in HSP90 [87], HSP72 [88], HSP105 [89], HSP70 [90,91] and HSP86 [92]. These observations have suggested that for HSP soluble forms, TEV can act as immunoregulators. It has been shown that the interaction of HPS expressed by TEV and TLR2 or TLR4 on myeloid cells (DC or MDSC) triggers pSTAT3 expression and IL-6 production, thereby repressing the antitumour immune reaction [88,90]. Moreover, TEV released upon hypoxia were found to be enriched in HSP70 and HSP90 and involved in invasiveness and stemness properties of prostate cancer cells [91]. In addition, human-melanoma-derived TEV enriched in HSP86 interact with TLR4 on myeloid cells, resulting in PDL-1 upregulation and blockade of T-cell activation [92].
Meanwhile, the antitumour activity of TEV enriched in different HSP isoforms was also reported [93,94,95,96,97]. HSP70+ TEV secreted by human pancreatic and colon carcinoma cell lines induced NK [93,94] and Th1 reactivity [95], and converted Treg into Th17 cells [96]. This resulted in a strong antitumour immune response. Pretreatment of melanoma and colon carcinoma cells with recombinant HSP70 increased the release of HPS70+ TEV, which, in vivo, translates in a strong anticancer immune response [97].
The correlation of different circulating HSP in cancer patients with tumour progression [86], the relevance of HSP in immune regulation [98], as well as their enrichment in TEV [84] strongly support the contribute of HSP+ TEV in mediating tumour immune suppression. However, further studies are required to clarify this specific topic.

3.4. Integrins (ITGA/ITGB)

Integrins are critical receptors for extracellular matrix proteins supporting cell adhesion and driving cell migration. α1β1 and α2β1 integrins are major collagen receptors, whereas α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins preferentially bind fibronectin. Fibronectin interacting with TEV-associated integrins drives the invasive phenotype to recipient fibroblasts [99]. TEV enriched in integrins support tumour spreading and metastasis formation [100,101,102,103]. Extracellular matrix proteins can link TEV and target cells as a bridge to induce specific biological responses. Indeed, it was shown that the expression of α6β1, α6β4 and αvβ5 in TEV dictates cell target specificity and organotropic metastasis [100]. Moreover, it has been shown that EV integrin cargo is involved in immune cell recruitment [104,105], suggesting that integrins in TEV may be instrumental to immune cell homing and specific targeting. Overall, TEV integrin content regulates their uptake [106], identifies specific secondary tissues [100], and attracts immune cells [107,108].
CD47 (Cluster of Differentiation 47) is an integrin-associated protein that is overexpressed by tumour cells and TEV and plays a role in immune regulation [109,110]. CD47 binds the SIgnal-Regulatory Protein alpha (SIRPα) [111], able to deliver inhibitory signals to macrophages. It was shown that downregulation of CD47 in TEV enhanced macrophages-mediated cancer cell phagocytosis [112].

3.5. TEV as Immunosuppressive Shuttles

TEV hold immune checkpoint molecules and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Physiologically, the checkpoint machinery controls T-cell activation, counteracting unnecessary tissue damage and autoimmunity. In cancer, TEV enriched in immune checkpoint ligands bind T-cell-associated cognate receptors, thereby reducing tumour killing. Several immune checkpoint pathways are referred to as crucial for anticancer therapeutic approaches, and among them PD1/PD-L1, CTLA4/B7, TIM3, Trail and Fas/FasL have received particular attention [113] (Figure 2).

3.6. Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1) and Its Ligand (PD-L1)

PD-1/PD-L1 signalling controls and impairs inflammation. Activated T cells express PD-1 and secrete inflammatory factors, such as IFNγ and TNFα, that in turn, upregulate PD-L1 in surrounding cells as well as in EV [114,115,116,117]. Several tumours hijack the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway by inducing the expression of PD-L1 in the TME compartment. Persistent PD-1/PD-L1 binding leads to T-cell exhaustion, inhibition of proliferation and T-cell apoptosis. Conversely, Treg (CD4+ Foxp3+) bearing PD-1 promotes naive CD4+ T cell differentiation towards Treg [118]. Thus, PD-1 expression not only suppresses effector T-cell function, but also dictates T-cell shift towards an immunosuppressive phenotype.
The immunosuppressive role of PD-L1+ TEV was reported in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [119], prostate cancer, melanoma [115] and non-small cell lung cancer [120]. PD-1 blocking antibodies have been shown to exert remarkable anticancer immune activity in PD-L1+ tumours [121]. However, TEV enriched in PD-L1 were described as both mediators of tumour immune evasion and predictors of anti-PD-1 treatment effectiveness [118,122].

3.7. CTLA-4/B7/CD152

As PD-1, CTLA-4 is broadly engaged during tumour immune evasion to suppress CD4+ effector T-cells and boost Treg activity [123]. After CD80/CD86 binding, CTLA-4 suppresses CD8+ T cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and cytokine (IL-2, IFN-γ) production [124]. CTLA-4 competes with CD28 for CD80/CD86 ligands. CD28 activates and induces a T-cell pro-inflammatory phenotype, while CTLA-4, displaying high affinity for CD80/CD86, guarantees T-cell suppression [125]. All at once, stimulation of CTLA-4 on Treg leads to FoxP3 upregulation, thereby improving Treg functions [126]. In fact, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies reduce the number of Treg at the tumour site, inhibit their negative regulatory effects, and enhance the antitumour immune response [127]. Therefore, CTLA-4 may exert pleiotropic effects on target cells depending on the presence of discrete markers of activation.
TEV carry both CTLA-4 and its ligands CD80/CD86 [127,128,129,130]. It has been proposed that the expression of CD80/CD86 in TEV interferes with CTL activity by binding to CTLA-4 [128,129]. Circulating TEV carrying CTLA-4 were also detected in cancer patients, and their concentration correlated with a poor outcome [127,130]. It has been proposed that CTLA-4 in TEV acts as a scavenger for the CD80/CD86 pro-apoptotic ligands, thereby protecting tumour cells. According to this possibility, TEV enriched in CTLA-4 regulate the PTEN/CD44 signalling pathway to promote proliferation, self-renewal and liver metastasis [131].

3.8. T-Cell Immunoglobulin Domain and Mucin Domain 3 (TIM-3)

TIM-3, a transmembrane protein expressed by activated immune cells, suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion [132] and CTL function [133], thereby mediating immune suppression.
It was shown that TEV are enriched in TIM-3 [134] and that the level of TIM-3 on circulating TEV positively correlated with cancer progression [135]. Moreover, TEV can transfer TIM-3 to macrophages, driving their M2 differentiation [134].

3.9. Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73)

CD73 is a 5′-nucleotidase that converts AMP into the anti-inflammatory adenosine [136]. In cancer, free adenosine generated by CD73 inhibits cellular immune responses, thereby promoting tumour immune escape [137]. MDSC, Treg or DC expressing CD73 generate adenosine in tumours, which triggers the anti-inflammatory response via T-cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells (NK) [138,139]. Several studies have reported that the expression of CD73 in TEV also contributes to immunosuppression in different cancers [140,141]. TEV transfer CD73 to T-cells and inhibit their cell cycle entry and clonal proliferation by increasing adenosine [140]. Consistently, inhibition of TEV production or CD73 expression significantly inhibit tumour growth by restoring T-cell clonal proliferation [140]. It was also shown that CD73+ TEV upregulate the expression of IL-6, IL-10, TNFα and TGFβ1 in TAM by activating the NF-κB pathway [141]. Moreover, circulating CD73+ TEV increased the risk of lymph node metastases and was associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, loss of CD73+ TEV enhanced the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 treatment by rescuing CTL function [141].

3.10. Fas/FasL

Like PD-L1, CTLA-4 and CD73, Fas/FasL is hijacked by cancer cells to suppress the immune response and induce tumour immune evasion. FasL (CD95) is the most studied mediator of T-cell apoptosis [142]. Fas+ T cells undergo apoptosis upon binding to FasL, which is expressed in APC, tumours, and other cell types. It was also shown that IL-10, VEGF and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) enhance the expression of FasL in tumour cells [143]. The expression of the Fas competitor, c-FLIP, in Treg and tumour cells determines their resistance to FasL-mediated apoptosis [144,145,146]. In addition, in cancer cells, the binding of c-FLIP to FasL+ EV interferes with the activation of caspase-8, thereby promoting tumour invasiveness and metastasis formation [147].
Circulating TEV carrying both Fas and FasL were detected in cancer patients [148]. It has been proposed that TEV expressing Fas may act as FasL scavenger, protecting tumour cells from death-receptor-mediated apoptosis [148], while FasL+ TEV act as inducers of T-cell apoptosis [149,150]. In addition, patient-derived FasL+ TEV were shown to induce caspase-3 cleavage, cytochrome c release and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in target T-lymphocytes [151].

3.11. TRAIL

TRAIL (Apo2L) is a transmembrane protein homologous to FasL (Apo1) and belongs to the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily. Its extracellular domain can be proteolytically cleaved from the cell surface, thereby acting as a cytokine. TRAIL was shown to induce caspase-8-dependent apoptosis in tumour cells by binding to death receptors 4 or 5 (DR4, TRAIL-R1, or DR5, TRAIL-RII) [152,153,154]. DR4 and DR5 are generally highly expressed on tumour cells, and their downregulation correlates with resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. However, TRAIL-mediated resistance depends on different mechanisms. For example, TRAIL binds the decoy receptors DcR1 [155] and DcR2. DcR2 has a truncated cytoplasmic domain which activates NF-κB [156], resulting in inflammatory and pro-survival gene transcription [156,157]. In TRAIL-resistant tumours, TRAIL activation promotes tumour cell migration and inflammatory immune responses partially via c-FLIP. Overexpression of cFLIP and mutation of caspase-8 rewire TRAIL signalling to promote NF-κB activation [158,159].
TRAIL carried EV exerting antitumour activity [160,161,162,163,164]. However, circulating TRAIL+ TEV were detected in head and neck cancer [164] and glioblastoma patients [130]. It can be hypothesised that cancer cells eliminate TRAIL by releasing TRAIL+ TEV, which in turn act as scavengers for death receptors. However, TRAIL+ TEV were shown to induce T-cell apoptosis [150]. In addition, TEV carrying the TRAIL receptor DR5 were shown to impair tumour apoptosis [165].

3.12. Protein Corona and TEV Mechanism of Action

Apart from membrane-associated proteins, such as PD-L1, CD73 and FasL, TEV are enriched in growth factors and cytokines involved in the immune regulation. These proteins can be part of “protein corona”, artificially linked to TEV [166,167,168], or naturally linked to their receptors, as shown for TGFβ1 [169].
Several membrane receptors expressed in TEV can bind their ligands (integrins/extracellular matrix proteins; TLRs/HSP and nucleic acids; receptors/growth factors and cytokines). Interestingly, EV covered with protein corona were more effective in monocyte activation, compared to “pure” EV or protein aggregates (protein corona). This suggests that EV-mediated immune cell activation depends on both protein corona and EV cargo. Conversely, it has been shown that DC differentiation and maturation only depend on EV cargo [167,168]. These findings indicate that TEV-mediated immune regulation is much more complex than expected.

3.13. TGFβ1

TGFβ1 has been extensively investigated as an immunosuppressive factor in tumour settings. Webber and colleagues [169] showed the natural surface binding of TGFβ1 on TEV. TGFβ1, bound as a latent form, is able to activate the SMAD signalling pathway and gene expression in target cells [169]. TEV enriched in TGFβ1 were described in gastric [170], bladder [171], head and neck cancer [39], mesothelioma [172], breast [173], prostate and other cancers [169]. It was shown that TGFβ1+ TEV boost the expression of CTLA-4, FasL, IL-10 and other immunosuppressive proteins [174]. TGFβ1 acts on CTL by interfering with the expression of perforin, granzyme A and B, FasL and IFNγ [175], and by inducing Treg differentiation and IL-10 production [176,177].

3.14. Interleukin 10 (IL-10)

IL-10 is a regulatory cytokine with pleiotropic effects in various cell types [178]. IL-10 can directly inhibit T-cell responses [179,180], thereby enhancing Treg differentiation [177,181,182]. More importantly, IL-10 inhibits DC and macrophage functions by suppressing inflammatory cytokine production and inhibiting the expression of MHC class II and the co-stimulatory-molecules CD80/CD86 [183]. In cancer, the co-expression of IL-10 and tumour antigens reprogram APC towards a tumour-tolerant phenotype.
As TGFβ1, TEV enriched in IL-10 were detected in plasma of different cancer patients; however, the most relevant action performed by TEV is the induction of IL-10 and TFGβ1 in target cells via their RNA content [184,185,186].
Table 1. Protein content of TEV involved in immune regulation and cellular effectors of each TEV marker. TEV mechanism of action in immune regulation is also indicated.
Table 1. Protein content of TEV involved in immune regulation and cellular effectors of each TEV marker. TEV mechanism of action in immune regulation is also indicated.
Molecules Enriched in TEVCellular EffectorsImmune-Related MechanismRefs.
Tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81)LFA-1EV uptake by leukocytes[60,61,62]
MHC I, MHC IIRegulation of TEV immunogenicity[55,65]
ADAM10, ADAM17ADAM sheddase activity[63]
HSPsTLRsNF-κβ activation and expression of genes involved in immune suppression in tumour cells[8,78]
MDSCs-mediated production of immunosuppressive factor and induction of TAM/M2 polarisation[85,88]
Integrins (ITGA/ITGB),
CD47
Extracellular matrix proteins (fibronectin, collagen)Boost of fibroblast invasive phenotype, tumour spreading and immune cell recruitment[99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]
PD-L1PD-1Suppression of CTL functions and induction CD4+ Treg activity[118,122]
CD80/CD86CTLA4[123,124]
TIM-3Galectin-9Induction of TAM/M2 differentiation[134,135]
CD73AMPSuppression of T-cell clonal expansion and production of immunosuppressive cytokines by M2/TAM[140,141]
FasLFasInduction of T-cell apoptosis[149,150]
TRAILTRAIL-RI/RII[150]
TGFβTGFβ-R1/2Increased expression of immunosuppressive factors, suppression of CTL functions and induction of CD4+ Treg activity[174,175,176]
IL-10IL-10RSuppression of CTL function, induction of CD4+ Treg activity and APC reprogramming towards tolerance [178,179,180,181,182,183]

3.15. TEV Non-Coding RNA Content

EV in general, and TEV in particular, contain and transfer different types of RNAs (mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, circular RNA, rRNAs, tRNAs, PIWI-interacting RNAs, mitochondrial RNAs, Y RNAs and vault RNAs) to target cells [187,188,189] (Figure 3). TEV-RNA content was firstly described by Skog et al. [190]. Data from different studies [191,192,193] have suggested a crucial role of EV-RNA in the horizontal gene transfer and epigenetic regulation mediated by EV. Stable extracellular RNAs, lipids and proteins linked to EV have been found in all biological fluids [194,195], suggesting their role in several diseases, and in particular, in cancer [196].
It has been shown that TEV are enriched in microRNA with respect to their cell of origin. TEV miRNA content regulates and suppresses immune cells to support cancer growth. TEV miRNA cargo reprograms macrophage into tumour-associated macrophages (TAM). For example, miR-1246 and miR-940 (colon cancer-derived TEV), miR-222 (ovarian cancer), miR-29a-3p (oral squamous cell carcinoma), miR-21-5p (bladder cancer) and miR-503 (glioblastoma) were reported as essential players in TAM differentiation [197,198,199,200,201,202]. This results in the release of IL-10, TGFβ1 and matrix metalloproteinases by TAM to enhance tumour growth and progression. Likewise, MDSC, in response to TEV enriched in miR-34a, inhibit T-cell proliferation [203].
In addition to their canonical inhibitory function, miRNAs might also stimulate TLR7 and thus regulate target cell functions. For example, it was shown that TEV carrying miR-21 and miR-29a trigger NF-κB activation and the secretion of TNFα and IL-6 by binding to TLR7/8 [204]. A similar mechanism was described for miR-25 and miR-92a carried by liposarcoma-derived TEV [205]. Since the binding of TLR7 to the RNA is sequence specific [206,207], macrophage activation by TEV is fine-tuned.
As previously mentioned, TEV regulate the maturation state of APC by suppressing the expression of co-activation and maturation markers. TEV-carried microRNAs and proteins play a part in this process. It was shown that TEV-miR-424 content induces resistance to immune checkpoint blockade by suppressing the CD28-CD80/86 costimulatory pathway in tumour-infiltrating DC and T cells [208]. miR-203 enriched in TEV from pancreatic tumours inhibits the expression of TLR4 in recipient DC [209], whereas miR-212 modulates the expression of MHC II [210]. Thus, under the control of TEV-miRNA content, APC acquire a suppressive phenotype and inhibit T-cell cytotoxic activity. TEV containing miRNA can also directly modulate T cells. Indeed, TEV-miR-214 content significantly downregulated PTEN expression in T cells and promoted their shift towards Treg in Lewis lung cancer [211].
TEV carry a pattern of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) specific for each type of cancer. Circulating TEV from patients with pancreatic cancer contain several lncRNAs (i.e., FGA, KRT19, HIST1H2BK, ITIH2, MARCH2, CLDN1, MAL2, TIMP1, lnc-sox2ot) that correlate with the stage of the disease [212] and undergo downregulation after treatment [213]. The LncRNA PVT1 is commonly co-amplified with c-Myc. It encodes 52 ncRNAs variants, including 26 linear and 26 circular isoforms, and 6 microRNAs. PVT1 was associated with cancer immune regulation [214,215]. In addition, it was shown that in MDSC, PVT1 is upregulated by HIF-1α and modulates ARG1 activity and reactive oxygen species production, thereby suppressing T-cell antitumour immune response [216]. Overexpression of PVT1 in specific immune cells not only correlates with the suppression of antitumour response, but also contributes to treatment resistance, particularly immune checkpoint-based regimens [214]. In particular, high PVT1 expression predicts shorter disease-free survival in acute myeloid leukemia [217], ovarian [218], cervical [219] and colorectal cancer [220] and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [221]; therefore, it has been proposed as a mechanism of chemo resistance. PVT1 was found in TEV of different cancers [222,223] and contributes to the exosome secretion of tumour cells [224].
As reported above, TEV stimulate immune cells to release their own TEV to suppress the immune response, thereby promoting tumour outgrowth. For example, TAM-derived TEV enhance the aerobic glycolysis and apoptotic resistance of breast cancer cells via myeloid-specific lncRNA, named HIF-1α-stabilising long non-coding RNA (HISLA) [225]. HISLA was found highly expressed in breast cancer patients and undergoes reduction in patients with remission, and therefore it has been proposed as biomarker of drug resistance [225].

4. TEV and Drug Resistance

During treatment, tumour cells develop resistance through different mechanisms specifically impairing drug efficacy. In particular, drug efflux and inactivation [226], pro-survival pathway activation [227], EMT [228], immune evasion and de-differentiation towards stem-like phenotype [229] are the most relevant mechanisms. Drug efflux was detected in many types of cancer cells and depends on several transporters [230]. Among them, P-glycoprotein (p-gp) is the most investigated in cancer [231]. Physiologically, p-gp pumps out a broad range of xenobiotics and manages the efflux of toxins in the intestine, liver or kidney. Different types of cancer also exploit p-gp to decrease local drug concentration. The overexpression of p-gp was shown in haematological malignancies [232], colorectal cancer [233] and others [234]. Mechanisms of TEV-mediated acquired drug resistance mainly rely on protein or RNA transfer from resistant cells to susceptible recipient cells, or by exporting cytotoxic substances. As shown for doxorubicin-resistant osteosarcoma, the transfer of p-gp by TEV allows recipient cells to remove anticancer drugs [235]. Moreover, it was shown that TEV could transfer miR-451 and miR-27a to increase p-gp expression [236,237].
TEV cargo also turns on pro-survival pathways in recipient cancer cells. In particular, IL-6 promotes drug resistance [238] by upregulating multidrug resistance-related genes (MDR1 and GSTpi), apoptosis inhibitory proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and XIAP) and activating the Ras/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signalling pathway [239]. Indeed, several studies demonstrated that TEV-mediated IL-6 production is a common mechanism of drug resistance [240,241,242]. The in vivo blockade of the release of TEV from TAM was reported as the most relevant mechanism improving gemcitabine sensitivity. The authors also provided evidence that TEV miR-365 content was involved in gemcitabine resistance [243].
As shown by Pavlyukov and colleagues [244], drug resistance also relies on RNA splicing. They found that glioblastoma cells release TEV enriched in the splicing factor RBM11. RBM11 is generally upregulated in apoptotic tumour cells during anticancer therapies. Once transferred to recipient cells, RBM11 switches the splicing of MDM4 and Cyclin D1 genes towards more oncogenic isoforms [244].
TEV also regulate immune checkpoint molecules to drive immune evasion, leading to tumour resistance. The expression of CD28 and CD80/86, required for PD-1 or CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade [245,246], was found under the control of TEV-miRNA content. Indeed, it was shown that miR-424 in TEV suppresses the expression of CD28-CD80/86 in TILs and DC, leading to drug resistance [208].
TEV surface proteins can act as decoy receptors for antibodies-based therapy, thereby decreasing drug bioavailability. In B-cell lymphoma, the expression of CD20 in TEV protects lymphoma cells from rituximab [247]. Similarly, in breast cancer, HER2+ TEV modulate resistance to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody [248]. In melanoma patients, circulating PD-L1+ TEV early after immune checkpoint blockade classifies patients as resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy [122]. Indeed, PD-L1+ TEV act as scavengers for immunotherapeutics [114,122].
Therefore, TEV-mediated transfer of proteins or RNAs induces drug resistance by reprogramming tumour cells towards a highly metastatic phenotype or by inactivating immune cells.

5. TEV Released by TME Cells

Tumour tissue consists of cancer cells and recruited stromal, vascular and immune cells which, by releasing stimulatory growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines at the primary tumour site, promote angiogenesis and metastasis and suppress the anticancer immune response [249]. These cells in the TME include cancer-associated fibroblasts [240], tumour endothelial cells (TEC) [250], adipocytes [251,252], tumour-associated immune cells as TAM [253] and MDSC [254], DC [255], monocytes [256], CTL [257] and Treg [258], B cells [259], regulatory NK [260] and tumour-educated platelets [261]. Growing evidence indicates that cancer cells could recruit and reprogram all cell types. Notably, it was shown that TEV can induce tumour innervation [262] and that tumour-associated neuronal cells regulate tumour-infiltrated immune cell functions.
TEV released from cancer-associated cells were described as tumour promoters. It has been shown that plasma from cancer patients contains a significantly higher EV concentration [263], originating from both tumour and normal cells. Herein, the immunosuppressive mechanisms involving circulating TEV derived from different tumour-associated cells are described (Figure 4).

5.1. TEV Derived from Tumour-Educated Platelets

Activated platelets professionally release EV [264], which are the most abundant population of circulating EV. It has been shown that platelet concentration positively correlates with cancer growth [265]. Platelets and their EV are enriched in transcription factors, RNA and spliceosomes [266]. In cancer, megakaryocytes and platelets cross-talk with tumour via EV. This results in tumour-specific rearrangement of platelet transcriptome and proteome, leading to the establishment of the so-called tumour-educated platelets [267,268,269,270,271,272]. TEV expressing P-selectin (CD62P) and integrin αIIβ3 [273,274] regulate the immune system, stimulate angiogenesis, promote metastasis and are involved in drug resistance by activating discrete signalling cascades [275,276]. In particular, TEV released from tumour-educated platelets stimulate MAPK p42/44 and AKT, increase the expression of MMP1, MMP9, VEGF and cyclin D2 [277] and induce EMT by activating TGFβ1 and NF-κB signalling [278].

5.2. TEV from TEC

TEV derived from TEC are involved in cancer development, metastatic spread and tumour immune editing [39,279,280,281]. TEC-derived TEV contain pro-oncogenic proteins and RNAs involved in immune regulation (TGFβ1, HLA-G, IL-6, M-CSF, as well as lncRNA MALAT1 and miR-24-3p) [39,279,280]. It has been shown that TEC-derived TEV enhance the expression of PD-L1 in tumour and myeloid cells, promote the formation of Treg and decrease T-cell cytotoxic activity [39,279,281]. Interestingly, stress conditions in the TME (hypoxia, inflammation, changes in the pH and many others) induce the release of TEV with specific tumour-promoting properties. In particular, IL-3 signalling in TEC rearranges TEV miRNA cargo, which control β-catenin and PD-L1 expression as well as the metastatic spread [279,281].

5.3. EV Derived from DC

Tumour-primed immune cells can secrete immunologically active TEV. Commonly, EV derived from DC (DC-EV) carry functional MHC-complexes, thereby educating additional APC to recognise specific antigens [282] and cross-reactivating CD8+ T cells [283]. DC-EV play a critical role in generating antitumour CD8+ T cells. Indeed, several clinical trials based on tumour-primed DC-TEV were performed to find an effective antitumour vaccine [284,285].
However, growing evidence indicates that TEV mainly mediate tumour immune suppression by reprogramming cancer-infiltrated DC towards a tumour promoter phenotype. Thus, DC-mediated cross-presentation of tumour antigens commonly induces T-cell tolerance instead of antitumour activity.
DC-EV function depends on their molecular composition, in particular the concentration of co-stimulatory molecules (CD86, CD80, CD40) and antigen-presenting molecules (MHC-II, MHC-I) [286,287]. It was previously described that TEV cargo (HSP, TLR, HLA g [29]; S100A8, S100A9, Annexin A1 [30]; PGE2 [288]; TGFβ1 [289]; or microRNAs [290]), suppress DC maturation, resulting in the loss of tumour cell recognition [29,30]. Moreover, once activated by TEV, DC release their own TEV conveying tumour-associated antigens [291], which translate in T-cell cross-activation, antigen presentation, and immune tolerance [292,293]. Overall, TEV released by “immature” tumour-primed DC support cancer outgrowth by reprogramming immune cells towards immune tolerance.

6. Conclusions

Early after EV discovery [294] it was reported that cancer cells release TEV enriched in proteins and lipids, contributing to tumour immune escape [295]. Soon after, the same group showed that TEV express antigens recapitulating their cell of origin and can exert both pro- or antitumour action [296]. Moreover, since MHC class II on TEV induces specific T-cell responses [297], TEV have been proposed for immunotherapeutic strategies. [4,282,291,298,299,300]. However, TEV-based anticancer vaccines still lack robust clinical benefits, since the complex TEV molecular composition mainly reprograms immune cells for tolerance [7,301]. After TEV-mediated activation, immune cells release their own TEV to amplify and spread the oncogenic signals. In fact, elevated circulating EV displaying oncogenic properties are commonly detected in cancer patients and contribute to drug resistance.
Overall, TEV may be considered a “complex system”, and prediction of their biological functions based on their individual molecular components may somehow be misleading. Therefore, efforts to develop methodologies to deeply investigate how their molecular components control the antitumour immune response in concert are warranted. If successful, EV engineering approaches would offer the chance to reshape the immune reaction into tumour recognition and eradication.

Author Contributions

T.L. wrote the manuscript; A.S. contributed to manuscript writing and prepared images; M.F.B. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by grants obtained by MFB from Ministero dell’Istruzione, Università e Ricerca (MIUR) ex 60%.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Malvina Koni for her suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Whiteside, T.L. Exosomes and tumor-mediated immune suppression. J. Clin. Invest. 2016, 126, 1216–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Hoshino, A.; Kim, H.S.; Bojmar, L.; Gyan, K.E.; Cioffi, M.; Hernandez, J.; Zambirinis, C.P.; Rodrigues, G.; Molina, H.; Heissel, S.; et al. Extracellular Vesicle and Particle Biomarkers Define Multiple Human Cancers. Cell 2020, 182, 1044–1061.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Slingluff, C.L., Jr.; Cox, A.L.; Stover, J.M., Jr.; Moore, M.M.; Hunt, D.F.; Engelhard, V.H. Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Response to Autologous Human Squamous Cell Cancer of the Lung: Epitope Reconstitution with Peptides Extracted from HLA-Aw681. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 2731–2737. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wolfers, J.; Lozier, A.; Raposo, G.; Regnault, A.; Théry, C.; Masurier, C.; Flament, C.; Pouzieux, S.; Faure, F.; Tursz, T.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Echchakir, H.; Vergnon, I.; Dorothée, G.; Grunenwald, D.; Chouaib, S.; Mami-Chouaib, F. Evidence for in situ expansion of diverse antitumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones in a human large cell carcinoma of the lung. Int. Immunol. 2000, 12, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kambayashi, T.; Laufer, T.M. Atypical MHC class II-expressing antigen-presenting cells: Can anything replace a dendritic cell? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Costa-Silva, B.; Aiello, N.M.; Ocean, A.J.; Singh, S.; Zhang, H.; Thakur, B.K.; Becker, A.; Hoshino, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Andersen, M.H.; Schrama, D.; Thor Straten, P.; Becker, J.C. Cytotoxic T cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Coulie, P.G.; Van den Eynde, B.J.; van der Bruggen, P.; Boon, T. Tumour antigens recognized by T lymphocytes, at the core of cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arina, A.; Tirapu, I.; Alfaro, C.; Rodríguez-Calvillo, M.; Mazzolini, G.; Inogés, S.; López, A.; Feijoo, E.; Bendandi, M.; Melero, I. Clinical implications of antigen transfer mechanisms from malignant to dendritic cells: Exploiting cross-priming. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wilson, N.S.; El-Sukkari, D.; Villadangos, J.A. Dendritic cells constitutively present self antigens in their immature state in vivo and regulate antigen presentation by controlling the rates of MHC class II synthesis and endocytosis. Blood 2004, 103, 2187–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Worbs, T.; Hammerschmidt, S.I.; Förster, R. Dendritic cell migration in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 30–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Carreno, B.M.; Magrini, V.; Becker-Hapak, M.; Kaabinejadian, S.; Hundal, J.; Petti, A.A.; Ly, A.; Lie, W.-R.; Hildebrand, W.H.; Mardis, E.R.; et al. A dendritic cell vaccine increases the breadth and diversity of melanoma neoantigen-specific T cells. Science 2015, 348, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Albert, M.L.; Sauter, B.; Bhardwaj, N. Dendritic cells acquire antigen from apoptotic cells and induce class I-restricted CTLs. Nature 1998, 392, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mallegol, J.; Van Niel, G.; Lebreton, C.; Lepelletier, Y.; Candalh, C.; Dugave, C.; Heath, J.; Raposo, G.; Cerf-Bensussan, N.; Heyman, M. T84-Intestinal Epithelial Exosomes Bear MHC Class II/Peptide Complexes Potentiating Antigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 1866–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Appleman, L.J.; Boussiotis, V.A. T cell anergy and costimulation. Immunol. Rev. 2003, 192, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Förster, R.; Schubel, A.; Breitfeld, D.; Kremmer, E.; Renner-Müller, I.; Wolf, E.; Lipp, M. CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs. Cell 1999, 99, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ohl, L.; Mohaupt, M.; Czeloth, N.; Hintzen, G.; Kiafard, Z.; Zwirner, J.; Blankenstein, T.; Henning, G.; Förster, R. CCR7 governs skin dendritic cell migration under inflammatory and steady-state conditions. Immunity 2004, 21, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Steinman, R.M. The control of immunity and tolerance by dendritic cell. Pathol. Biol. 2003, 51, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Steinman, R.M.; Hawiger, D.; Liu, K.; Bonifaz, L.; Bonnyay, D.; Mahnke, K.; Iyoda, T.; Ravetch, J.; Dhodapkar, M.; Inaba, K.; et al. Dendritic cell function in vivo during the steady state: A role in peripheral tolerance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 987, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shiokawa, A.; Kotaki, R.; Takano, T.; Nakajima-Adachi, H.; Hachimura, S. Mesenteric lymph node CD11b- CD103+ PD-L1High dendritic cells highly induce regulatory T cells. Immunology 2017, 152, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, K.; Iyoda, T.; Saternus, M.; Kimura, Y.; Inaba, K.; Steinman, R.M. Immune Tolerance After Delivery of Dying Cells to Dendritic Cells In Situ. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Stuart, L.M.; Lucas, M.; Simpson, C.; Lamb, J.; Savill, J.; Lacy-Hulbert, A. Inhibitory effects of apoptotic cell ingestion upon endotoxin-driven myeloid dendritic cell maturation. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md. 1950 2002, 168, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wallet, M.A.; Sen, P.; Flores, R.; Wang, Y.; Yi, Z.; Huang, Y.; Mathews, C.E.; Earp, H.S.; Matsushima, G.; Wang, B.; et al. MerTK is required for apoptotic cell-induced T cell tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Patente, T.A.; Pinho, M.P.; Oliveira, A.A.; Evangelista, G.C.M.; Bergami-Santos, P.C.; Barbuto, J.A.M. Human Dendritic Cells: Their Heterogeneity and Clinical Application Potential in Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Verweij, F.J.; Revenu, C.; Arras, G.; Dingli, F.; Loew, D.; Pegtel, D.M.; Follain, G.; Allio, G.; Goetz, J.G.; Zimmermann, P.; et al. Live Tracking of Inter-organ Communication by Endogenous Exosomes In Vivo. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 573–589.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hyenne, V.; Ghoroghi, S.; Collot, M.; Bons, J.; Follain, G.; Harlepp, S.; Mary, B.; Bauer, J.; Mercier, L.; Busnelli, I.; et al. Studying the Fate of Tumor Extracellular Vesicles at High Spatiotemporal Resolution Using the Zebrafish Embryo. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 554–572.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scott, A.; Sueiro Ballesteros, L.; Bradshaw, M.; Tsuji, C.; Power, A.; Lorriman, J.; Love, J.; Paul, D.; Herman, A.; Emanueli, C.; et al. In Vivo Characterization of Endogenous Cardiovascular Extracellular Vesicles in Larval and Adult Zebrafish. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021, 41, 2454–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grange, C.; Tapparo, M.; Tritta, S.; Deregibus, M.C.; Battaglia, A.; Gontero, P.; Frea, B.; Camussi, G. Role of HLA-G and extracellular vesicles in renal cancer stem cell-induced inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Maus, R.L.G.; Jakub, J.W.; Nevala, W.K.; Christensen, T.A.; Noble-Orcutt, K.; Sachs, Z.; Hieken, T.J.; Markovic, S.N. Human Melanoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Regulate Dendritic Cell Maturation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 358. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00358 (accessed on 27 May 2022). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kurts, C.; Kosaka, H.; Carbone, F.R.; Miller, J.F.A.P.; Heath, W.R. Class I–restricted Cross-Presentation of Exogenous Self-Antigens Leads to Deletion of Autoreactive CD8+ T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Manicassamy, S.; Pulendran, B. Dendritic cell control of tolerogenic responses. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 241, 206–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Saito, M.; Nagasawa, M.; Takada, H.; Hara, T.; Tsuchiya, S.; Agematsu, K.; Yamada, M.; Kawamura, N.; Ariga, T.; Tsuge, I.; et al. Defective IL-10 signaling in hyper-IgE syndrome results in impaired generation of tolerogenic dendritic cells and induced regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sela, U.; Park, C.G.; Park, A.; Olds, P.; Wang, S.; Steinman, R.M.; Fischetti, V.A. Dendritic Cells Induce a Subpopulation of IL-12Rβ2-Expressing Treg that Specifically Consumes IL-12 to Control Th1 Responses. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Adler, A.J.; Marsh, D.W.; Yochum, G.S.; Guzzo, J.L.; Nigam, A.; Nelson, W.G.; Pardoll, D.M. CD4+ T cell tolerance to parenchymal self-antigens requires presentation by bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pardoll, D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bousso, P.; Robey, E.A. Dynamic Behavior of T Cells and Thymocytes in Lymphoid Organs as Revealed by Two-Photon Microscopy. Immunity 2004, 21, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Miller, M.J.; Hejazi, A.S.; Wei, S.H.; Cahalan, M.D.; Parker, I. T cell repertoire scanning is promoted by dynamic dendritic cell behavior and random T cell motility in the lymph node. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lopatina, T.; Favaro, E.; Danilova, L.; Fertig, E.J.; Favorov, A.V.; Kagohara, L.T.; Martone, T.; Bussolati, B.; Romagnoli, R.; Albera, R.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Released by Tumor Endothelial Cells Spread Immunosuppressive and Transforming Signals Through Various Recipient Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buschow, S.I.; Nolte-‘t Hoen, E.N.; Van Niel, G.; Pols, M.S.; Ten Broeke, T.; Lauwen, M.; Ossendorp, F.; Melief, C.J.; Raposo, G.; Wubbolts, R.; et al. MHC II in dendritic cells is targeted to lysosomes or T cell-induced exosomes via distinct multivesicular body pathways. Traffic Cph. Den. 2009, 10, 1528–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Shen, H.; He, Q.; Tian, W.; Xia, A.; Lu, X.-J. Exosomes derived from exhausted CD8+ T cells impaired the anticancer function of normal CD8+ T cells. J. Med. Genet. 2019, 56, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Okoye, I.S.; Coomes, S.M.; Pelly, V.S.; Czieso, S.; Papayannopoulos, V.; Tolmachova, T.; Seabra, M.C.; Wilson, M.S. MicroRNA-Containing T-Regulatory-Cell-Derived Exosomes Suppress Pathogenic T Helper 1 Cells. Immunity 2014, 41, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Smyth, L.A.; Ratnasothy, K.; Tsang, J.Y.; Boardman, D.; Warley, A.; Lechler, R.; Lombardi, G. CD73 expression on extracellular vesicles derived from CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells contributes to their regulatory function. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 2430–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Watkins, S.K.; Zhu, Z.; Riboldi, E.; Shafer-Weaver, K.A.; Stagliano, K.E.; Sklavos, M.M.; Ambs, S.; Yagita, H.; Hurwitz, A.A. FOXO3 programs tumor-associated DCs to become tolerogenic in human and murine prostate cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 121, 1361–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Flores-Toro, J.A.; Luo, D.; Gopinath, A.; Sarkisian, M.R.; Campbell, J.J.; Charo, I.F.; Singh, R.; Schall, T.J.; Datta, M.; Jain, R.K.; et al. CCR2 inhibition reduces tumor myeloid cells and unmasks a checkpoint inhibitor effect to slow progression of resistant murine gliomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuan, E.L.; Ziegler, S.F. A tumor–myeloid cell axis, mediated via the cytokines IL-1α and TSLP, promotes the progression of breast cancer. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaplan, R.N.; Riba, R.D.; Zacharoulis, S.; Bramley, A.H.; Vincent, L.; Costa, C.; MacDonald, D.D.; Jin, D.K.; Shido, K.; Kerns, S.A.; et al. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature 2005, 438, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Umakoshi, M.; Takahashi, S.; Itoh, G.; Kuriyama, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Yanagihara, K.; Yashiro, M.; Maeda, D.; Goto, A.; Tanaka, M. Macrophage-mediated transfer of cancer-derived components to stromal cells contributes to establishment of a pro-tumor microenvironment. Oncogene 2019, 38, 2162–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schiller, M.; Bekeredjian-Ding, I.; Heyder, P.; Blank, N.; Ho, A.D.; Lorenz, H.-M. Autoantigens are translocated into small apoptotic bodies during early stages of apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. A-Gonzalez, N.; Bensinger, S.J.; Hong, C.; Beceiro, S.; Bradley, M.N.; Zelcer, N.; Deniz, J.; Ramirez, C.; Díaz, M.; Gallardo, G.; et al. Apoptotic cells promote their own clearance and immune tolerance through activation of the nuclear receptor LXR. Immunity 2009, 31, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Miles, K.; Simpson, J.; Brown, S.; Cowan, G.; Gray, D.; Gray, M. Immune Tolerance to Apoptotic Self Is Mediated Primarily by Regulatory B1a Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 8, 1952. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01952 (accessed on 23 May 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Al-Nedawi, K.; Meehan, B.; Micallef, J.; Lhotak, V.; May, L.; Guha, A.; Rak, J. Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Di Vizio, D.; Morello, M.; Dudley, A.C.; Schow, P.W.; Adam, R.M.; Morley, S.; Mulholland, D.; Rotinen, M.; Hager, M.H.; Insabato, L.; et al. Large oncosomes in human prostate cancer tissues and in the circulation of mice with metastatic disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 1573–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vagner, T.; Spinelli, C.; Minciacchi, V.R.; Balaj, L.; Zandian, M.; Conley, A.; Zijlstra, A.; Freeman, M.R.; Demichelis, F.; De, S.; et al. Large extracellular vesicles carry most of the tumour DNA circulating in prostate cancer patient plasma. J. Extracell Vesicles 2018, 7, 1505403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Escola, J.M.; Kleijmeer, M.J.; Stoorvogel, W.; Griffith, J.M.; Yoshie, O.; Geuze, H.J. Selective enrichment of tetraspan proteins on the internal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes and on exosomes secreted by human B-lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 20121–20127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mellman, I. Dendritic cells: Master regulators of the immune response. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2013, 1, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Garg, A.D.; Nowis, D.; Golab, J.; Vandenabeele, P.; Krysko, D.V.; Agostinis, P. Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: An emerging amalgamation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1805, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yáñez-Mó, M.; Barreiro, O.; Gordon-Alonso, M.; Sala-Valdés, M.; Sánchez-Madrid, F. Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: A functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hwang, I.; Shen, X.; Sprent, J. Direct stimulation of naive T cells by membrane vesicles from antigen-presenting cells: Distinct roles for CD54 and B7 molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6670–6675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Nolte-’t Hoen, E.N.M.; Buschow, S.I.; Anderton, S.M.; Stoorvogel, W.; Wauben, M.H.M. Activated T cells recruit exosomes secreted by dendritic cells via LFA-1. Blood 2009, 113, 1977–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Segura, E.; Nicco, C.; Lombard, B.; Véron, P.; Raposo, G.; Batteux, F.; Amigorena, S.; Théry, C. ICAM-1 on exosomes from mature dendritic cells is critical for efficient naive T-cell priming. Blood 2005, 106, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Dornier, E.; Coumailleau, F.; Ottavi, J.F.; Moretti, J.; Boucheix, C.; Mauduit, P.; Schweisguth, F.; Rubinstein, E. TspanC8 tetraspanins regulate ADAM10/Kuzbanian trafficking and promote Notch activation in flies and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 199, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Söderberg, A.; Barral, A.M.; Söderström, M.; Sander, B.; Rosén, A. Redox-signaling transmitted in trans to neighboring cells by melanoma-derived TNF-containing exosomes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Perugini, V.R.; Zamai, M.; Gonzalez-Granado, J.M.; Barreiro, O.; Tejera, E.; Yáñez-Mó, M.; Caiolfa, V.R.; Sanchez-Madrid, F. CD81 controls sustained T cell activation signaling and defines the maturation stages of cognate immunological synapses. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33, 3644–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Chow, J.; Franz, K.M.; Kagan, J.C. PRRs are watching you: Localization of innate sensing and signaling regulators. Virology 2015, 479–480, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kalra, H.; Drummen, G.P.C.; Mathivanan, S. Focus on Extracellular Vesicles: Introducing the Next Small Big Thing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hoebe, K.; Du, X.; Georgel, P.; Janssen, E.; Tabeta, K.; Kim, S.O.; Goode, J.; Lin, P.; Mann, N.; Mudd, S.; et al. Identification of Lps2 as a key transducer of MyD88-independent TIR signalling. Nature 2003, 424, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Murad, S. Toll-like receptor 4 in inflammation and angiogenesis: A double-edged sword. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Toll-like Receptors Activation, Signaling, and Targeting, An Overview | Bulletin of the National Research Centre | Full Text. Available online: https://bnrc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42269-019-0227-2 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  71. Du, M.; Butchi, N.B.; Woods, T.; Peterson, K.E. Poly-thymidine oligonucleotides mediate activation of murine glial cells primarily through TLR7, not TLR8. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ishii, K.J.; Akira, S. TLR ignores methylated RNA? Immunity 2005, 23, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Paschon, V.; Takada, S.H.; Ikebara, J.M.; Sousa, E.; Raeisossadati, R.; Ulrich, H.; Kihara, A.H. Interplay Between Exosomes, microRNAs and Toll-Like Receptors in Brain Disorders. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 2016–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schaefer, T.M.; Desouza, K.; Fahey, J.V.; Beagley, K.W.; Wira, C.R. Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression and TLR-mediated cytokine/chemokine production by human uterine epithelial cells. Immunology 2004, 112, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fitzner, N.; Clauberg, S.; Essmann, F.; Liebmann, J.; Kolb-Bachofen, V. Human Skin Endothelial Cells Can Express All 10 TLR Genes and Respond to Respective Ligands. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2008, 15, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Huang, B.; Zhao, J.; Unkeless, J.C.; Feng, Z.H.; Xiong, H. TLR signaling by tumor and immune cells: A double-edged sword. Oncogene 2008, 27, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Takeda, K.; Akira, S. TLR signaling pathways. Semin. Immunol. 2004, 16, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Huang, B.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; He, K.L.; Chen, Y.; Mayer, L.; Unkeless, J.C.; Xiong, H. Toll-like receptors on tumor cells facilitate evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5009–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Elmallah, M.I.Y.; Cordonnier, M.; Vautrot, V.; Chanteloup, G.; Garrido, C.; Gobbo, J. Membrane-anchored heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70) in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020, 469, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Grunberg, N.; Pevsner-Fischer, M.; Goshen-Lago, T.; Diment, J.; Stein, Y.; Lavon, H.; Mayer, S.; Levi-Galibov, O.; Friedman, G.; Ofir-Birin, Y.; et al. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote Aggressive Gastric Cancer Phenotypes via Heat Shock Factor 1–Mediated Secretion of Extracellular Vesicles. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 1639–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hance, M.W.; Dole, K.; Gopal, U.; Bohonowych, J.E.; Jezierska-Drutel, A.; Neumann, C.A.; Liu, H.; Garraway, I.P.; Isaacs, J.S. Secreted Hsp90 is a novel regulator of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in prostate cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 37732–37744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Nolan, K.D.; Franco, O.E.; Hance, M.W.; Hayward, S.W.; Isaacs, J.S. Tumor-secreted Hsp90 subverts polycomb function to drive prostate tumor growth and invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 8271–8282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Asada, Y.; Tsuruta, M.; Okabayashi, K.; Shigeta, K.; Ishida, T.; Shimada, T.; Suzumura, H.; Koishikawa, K.; Akimoto, S.; Hasegawa, H.; et al. Inhibition of Heat-shock Protein 27 Reduces 5-Fluorouracil-acquired Resistance in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2021, 41, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Taha, E.A.; Ono, K.; Eguchi, T. Roles of Extracellular HSPs as Biomarkers in Immune Surveillance and Immune Evasion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Gobbo, J.; Marcion, G.; Cordonnier, M.; Dias, A.M.M.; Pernet, N.; Hammann, A.; Richaud, S.; Mjahed, H.; Isambert, N.; Clausse, V.; et al. Restoring Anticancer Immune Response by Targeting Tumor-Derived Exosomes With a HSP70 Peptide Aptamer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2016, 108, djv330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chanteloup, G.; Cordonnier, M.; Isambert, N.; Bertaut, A.; Hervieu, A.; Hennequin, A.; Luu, M.; Zanetta, S.; Coudert, B.; Bengrine, L.; et al. Monitoring HSP70 exosomes in cancer patients’ follow up: A clinical prospective pilot study. J. Extracell Vesicles 2020, 9, 1766192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ono, K.; Eguchi, T.; Sogawa, C.; Calderwood, S.K.; Futagawa, J.; Kasai, T.; Seno, M.; Okamoto, K.; Sasaki, A.; Kozaki, K.I. HSP-enriched properties of extracellular vesicles involve survival of metastatic oral cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2018, 119, 7350–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Chalmin, F.; Ladoire, S.; Mignot, G.; Vincent, J.; Bruchard, M.; Remy-Martin, J.P.; Boireau, W.; Rouleau, A.; Simon, B.; Lanneau, D.; et al. Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shen, Y.; Guo, D.; Weng, L.; Wang, S.; Ma, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.; Cai, Z. Tumor-derived exosomes educate dendritic cells to promote tumor metastasis via HSP72/HSP105-TLR2/TLR4 pathway. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1362527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Diao, J.; Yang, X.; Song, X.; Chen, S.; He, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, G.; Luo, C.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y. Exosomal Hsp70 mediates immunosuppressive activity of the myeloid-derived suppressor cells via phosphorylation of Stat3. Med. Oncol. 2015, 32, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ramteke, A.; Ting, H.; Agarwal, C.; Mateen, S.; Somasagara, R.; Hussain, A.; Graner, M.; Frederick, B.; Agarwal, R.; Deep, G. Exosomes secreted under hypoxia enhance invasiveness and stemness of prostate cancer cells by targeting adherens junction molecules. Mol. Carcinog. 2015, 54, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Fleming, V.; Hu, X.; Weller, C.; Weber, R.; Groth, C.; Riester, Z.; Hüser, L.; Sun, Q.; Nagibin, V.; Kirschning, C.; et al. Melanoma Extracellular Vesicles Generate Immunosuppressive Myeloid Cells by Upregulating PD-L1 via TLR4 Signaling. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4715–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gastpar, R.; Gehrmann, M.; Bausero, M.A.; Asea, A.; Gross, C.; Schroeder, J.A.; Multhoff, G. Heat Shock Protein 70 Surface-Positive Tumor Exosomes Stimulate Migratory and Cytolytic Activity of Natural Killer Cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5238–5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Lv, L.-H.; Wan, Y.-L.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, M.; Li, G.-L.; Lin, H.-M.; Shang, C.-Z.; Chen, Y.-J.; Min, J. Anticancer Drugs Cause Release of Exosomes with Heat Shock Proteins from Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells That Elicit Effective Natural Killer Cell Antitumor Responses in Vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 15874–15885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Cho, J.; Lee, Y.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Ko, J.-K.; Kim, C.-W. MHC independent anti-tumor immune responses induced by Hsp70-enriched exosomes generate tumor regression in murine models. Cancer Lett. 2009, 275, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Guo, D.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Yu, L.; Shen, Y.; Zhong, H.; Yang, Y. Exosomes from heat-stressed tumour cells inhibit tumour growth by converting regulatory T cells to Th17 cells via IL-6. Immunology 2018, 154, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Komarova, E.Y.; Suezov, R.V.; Nikotina, A.D.; Aksenov, N.D.; Garaeva, L.A.; Shtam, T.A.; Zhakhov, A.V.; Martynova, M.G.; Bystrova, O.A.; Istomina, M.S.; et al. Hsp70-containing extracellular vesicles are capable of activating of adaptive immunity in models of mouse melanoma and colon carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zininga, T.; Ramatsui, L.; Shonhai, A. Heat Shock Proteins as Immunomodulants. Molecules 2018, 23, 2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Chanda, D.; Otoupalova, E.; Hough, K.P.; Locy, M.L.; Bernard, K.; Deshane, J.S.; Sanderson, R.D.; Mobley, J.A.; Thannickal, V.J. Fibronectin on the Surface of Extracellular Vesicles Mediates Fibroblast Invasion. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2019, 60, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hoshino, A.; Costa-Silva, B.; Shen, T.-L.; Rodrigues, G.; Hashimoto, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; Kohsaka, S.; Di Giannatale, A.; Ceder, S.; et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 2015, 527, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Sung, B.H.; Ketova, T.; Hoshino, D.; Zijlstra, A.; Weaver, A.M. Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Singh, A.; Fedele, C.; Lu, H.; Nevalainen, M.T.; Keen, J.H.; Languino, L.R. Exosome-mediated Transfer of αvβ3 Integrin from Tumorigenic to Nontumorigenic Cells Promotes a Migratory Phenotype. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2016, 14, 1136–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. DeRita, R.M.; Sayeed, A.; Garcia, V.; Krishn, S.R.; Shields, C.D.; Sarker, S.; Friedman, A.; McCue, P.; Molugu, S.K.; Rodeck, U.; et al. Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Require β1 Integrins to Promote Anchorage-Independent Growth. iScience 2019, 14, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Purushothaman, A.; Bandari, S.K.; Liu, J.; Mobley, J.A.; Brown, E.E.; Sanderson, R.D. Fibronectin on the Surface of Myeloma Cell-derived Exosomes Mediates Exosome-Cell Interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 1652–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Guo, Q.; Furuta, K.; Lucien, F.; Sanchez, L.H.G.; Hirsova, P.; Krishnan, A.; Kabashima, A.; Pavelko, K.D.; Madden, B.; Alhuwaish, H.; et al. Integrin β1-enriched extracellular vesicles mediate monocyte adhesion and promote liver inflammation in murine NASH. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 1193–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Grigoryeva, E.S.; Savelieva, O.E.; Popova, N.O.; Cherdyntseva, N.V.; Perelmuter, V.M. Do tumor exosome integrins alone determine organotropic metastasis? Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 8145–8157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Altei, W.F.; Pachane, B.C.; dos Santos, P.K.; Ribeiro, L.N.M.; Sung, B.H.; Weaver, A.M.; Selistre-De-Araújo, H.S. Inhibition of αvβ3 integrin impairs adhesion and uptake of tumor-derived small extracellular vesicles. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Soe, Z.Y.; Park, E.J.; Shimaoka, M. Integrin Regulation in Immunological and Cancerous Cells and Exosomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Willingham, S.B.; Volkmer, J.-P.; Gentles, A.J.; Sahoo, D.; Dalerba, P.; Mitra, S.S.; Wang, J.; Contreras-Trujillo, H.; Martin, R.; Cohen, J.D.; et al. The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6662–6667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Liu, X.; Pu, Y.; Cron, K.R.; Deng, L.; Kline, J.; Frazier, W.A.; Xu, H.; Peng, H.; Fu, Y.-X.; Xu, M.M. CD47 blockade triggers T cell–mediated destruction of immunogenic tumors. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1209–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Chao, M.P.; Weissman, I.L.; Majeti, R. The CD47–SIRPα pathway in cancer immune evasion and potential therapeutic implications. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Shimizu, A.; Sawada, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Yagi, T.; Kinose, Y.; Kodama, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Kimura, T. Exosomal CD47 Plays an Essential Role in Immune Evasion in Ovarian Cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2021, 19, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gaikwad, S.; Agrawal, M.Y.; Kaushik, I.; Ramachandran, S.; Srivastava, S.K. Immune checkpoint proteins: Signaling mechanisms and molecular interactions in cancer immunotherapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ricklefs, F.L.; Alayo, Q.; Krenzlin, H.; Mahmoud, A.B.; Speranza, M.C.; Nakashima, H.; Hayes, J.L.; Lee, K.; Balaj, L.; Passaro, C.; et al. Immune evasion mediated by PD-L1 on glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Poggio, M.; Hu, T.; Pai, C.-C.; Chu, B.; Belair, C.D.; Chang, A.; Montabana, E.; Lang, U.E.; Fu, Q.; Fong, L.; et al. Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 Induces Systemic Anti-tumor Immunity and Memory. Cell 2019, 177, 414–427.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Sun, Z.; Fourcade, J.; Pagliano, O.; Chauvin, J.-M.; Sander, C.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Zarour, H.M. IL10 and PD-1 Cooperate to Limit the Activity of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cells. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 1635–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Butte, M.J.; Keir, M.E.; Phamduy, T.B.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. PD-L1 interacts specifically with B7-1 to inhibit T cell proliferation. Immunity 2007, 27, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Kamada, T.; Togashi, Y.; Tay, C.; Ha, D.; Sasaki, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Sato, E.; Fukuoka, S.; Tada, Y.; Tanaka, A.; et al. PD-1+ regulatory T cells amplified by PD-1 blockade promote hyperprogression of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9999–10008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Theodoraki, M.-N.; Yerneni, S.S.; Hoffmann, T.K.; Gooding, W.E.; Whiteside, T.L. Clinical Significance of PD-L1+ Exosomes in Plasma of Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kim, D.H.; Kim, H.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, J.-E.; Sung, K.J.; Sung, Y.H.; Pack, C.-G.; Jung, M.-K.; Han, B.; et al. Exosomal PD-L1 promotes tumor growth through immune escape in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Chen, L.; Han, X. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: Past, present, and future. J. Clin. Invest. 2015, 125, 3384–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Chen, G.; Huang, A.C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, G.; Wu, M.; Xu, W.; Yu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, B.; Sun, H.; et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 2018, 560, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Topalian, S.L.; Taube, J.M.; Anders, R.A.; Pardoll, D.M. Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Brunner, M.C.; Chambers, C.A.; Chan, F.K.; Hanke, J.; Winoto, A.; Allison, J.P. CTLA-4-Mediated inhibition of early events of T cell proliferation. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md. 1950 1999, 162, 5813–5820. [Google Scholar]
  125. Carreno, B.M.; Bennett, F.; Chau, T.A.; Ling, V.; Luxenberg, D.; Jussif, J.; Baroja, M.L.; Madrenas, J. CTLA-4 (CD152) can inhibit T cell activation by two different mechanisms depending on its level of cell surface expression. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md. 1950 2000, 165, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Barnes, M.J.; Griseri, T.; Johnson, A.M.F.; Young, W.; Powrie, F.; Izcue, A. CTLA-4 promotes Foxp3 induction and regulatory T cell accumulation in the intestinal lamina propria. Mucosal Immunol. 2013, 6, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Theodoraki, M.-N.; Yerneni, S.; Gooding, W.E.; Ohr, J.; Clump, D.A.; Bauman, J.E.; Ferris, R.L.; Whiteside, T.L. Circulating exosomes measure responses to therapy in head and neck cancer patients treated with cetuximab, ipilimumab, and IMRT. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, 1593805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Scarpa, M.; Marchiori, C.; Scarpa, M.; Castagliuolo, I. CD80 expression is upregulated by TP53 activation in human cancer epithelial cells. Oncoimmunology 2021, 10, 1907912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, Y.; Bai, W.; Zhang, L. The Overexpression of CD80 and ISG15 Are Associated with the Progression and Metastasis of Breast Cancer by a Meta-Analysis Integrating Three Microarray Datasets. Pathol. Oncol. Res. POR 2020, 26, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Azambuja, J.H.; Ludwig, N.; Yerneni, S.; Rao, A.; Braganhol, E.; Whiteside, T.L. Molecular profiles and immunomodulatory activities of glioblastoma-derived exosomes. Neuro-Oncol. Adv. 2020, 2, vdaa056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Mao, S.; Mo, Z.; Cao, Z.; Luo, J.; Zhou, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Yu, L. Exosome CTLA-4 Regulates PTEN/CD44 Signal Pathway in Spleen Deficiency Internal Environment to Promote Invasion and Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 757194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hastings, W.D.; Anderson, D.E.; Kassam, N.; Koguchi, K.; Greenfield, E.A.; Kent, S.C.; Zheng, X.X.; Strom, T.B.; Hafler, D.A.; Kuchroo, V.K. TIM-3 is Expressed on Activated Human CD4+ T Cells and Regulates Th1 and Th17 Cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 2492–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Zhu, C.; Anderson, A.C.; Kuchroo, V.K. TIM-3 and Its Regulatory Role in Immune Responses. In Negative Co-Receptors and Ligands; Ahmed, R., Honjo, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  134. Cheng, Z.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Ruan, Y.; Xue, W. Tumor-derived Exosomes Induced M2 Macrophage Polarization and Promoted the Metastasis of Osteosarcoma Cells Through Tim-3. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gao, J.; Qiu, X.; Li, X.; Fan, H.; Zhang, F.; Lv, T.; Song, Y. Expression profiles and clinical value of plasma exosomal Tim-3 and Galectin-9 in non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Allard, B.; Cousineau, I.; Spring, K.; Stagg, J. Measurement of CD73 enzymatic activity using luminescence-based and colorimetric assays. Methods Enzymol. 2019, 629, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  137. Kordaß, T.; Osen, W.; Eichmüller, S.B. Controlling the Immune Suppressor: Transcription Factors and MicroRNAs Regulating CD73/NT5E. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Nakav, S.; Chaimovitz, C.; Sufaro, Y.; Lewis, E.C.; Shaked, G.; Czeiger, D.; Zlotnik, M.; Douvdevani, A. Anti-Inflammatory Preconditioning by Agonists of Adenosine A1 Receptor. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Yu, M.; Guo, G.; Huang, L.; Deng, L.; Chang, C.-S.; Achyut, B.R.; Canning, M.; Xu, N.; Arbab, A.S.; Bollag, R.J.; et al. CD73 on cancer-associated fibroblasts enhanced by the A2B-mediated feedforward circuit enforces an immune checkpoint. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, M.; Jia, J.; Cui, Y.; Peng, Y.; Jiang, Y. CD73-positive extracellular vesicles promote glioblastoma immunosuppression by inhibiting T-cell clonal expansion. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Pan, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Ruan, M.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; et al. CD73 in small extracellular vesicles derived from HNSCC defines tumour-associated immunosuppression mediated by macrophages in the microenvironment. J. Extracell Vesicles 2022, 11, e12218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Strasser, A.; Jost, P.J.; Nagata, S. The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system. Immunity 2009, 30, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Schmidt, M.; Lügering, N.; Pauels, H.G.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Domschke, W.; Kucharzik, T. IL-10 induces apoptosis in human monocytes involving the CD95 receptor/ligand pathway. Eur. J. Immunol. 2000, 30, 1769–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Du, X.; Bao, G.; He, X.; Zhao, H.; Yu, F.; Qiao, Q.; Lu, J.; Ma, Q. Expression and biological significance of c-FLIP in human hepatocellular carcinomas. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 28, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Luebke, T.; Schwarz, L.; Beer, Y.Y.; Schumann, S.; Misterek, M.; Sander, F.E.; Plaza-Sirvent, C.; Schmitz, I. c-FLIP and CD95 signaling are essential for survival of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Plaza-Sirvent, C.; Schuster, M.; Neumann, Y.; Heise, U.; Pils, M.C.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Schmitz, I. c-FLIP Expression in Foxp3-Expressing Cells Is Essential for Survival of Regulatory T Cells and Prevention of Autoimmunity. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Cai, Z.; Yang, F.; Yu, L.; Yu, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Cao, X.; Wang, J. Activated T Cell Exosomes Promote Tumor Invasion via Fas Signaling Pathway. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 5954–5961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Albanese, J.; Meterissian, S.; Kontogiannea, M.; Dubreuil, C.; Hand, A.; Sorba, S.; Dainiak, N. Biologically active Fas antigen and its cognate ligand are expressed on plasma membrane-derived extracellular vesicles. Blood 1998, 91, 3862–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Andreola, G.; Rivoltini, L.; Castelli, C.; Huber, V.; Perego, P.; Deho, P.; Squarcina, P.; Accornero, P.; Lozupone, F.; Lugini, L.; et al. Induction of lymphocyte apoptosis by tumor cell secretion of FasL-bearing microvesicles. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195, 1303–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Huber, V.; Fais, S.; Iero, M.; Lugini, L.; Canese, P.; Squarcina, P.; Zaccheddu, A.; Colone, M.; Arancia, G.; Gentile, M.; et al. Human Colorectal Cancer Cells Induce T-Cell Death Through Release of Proapoptotic Microvesicles: Role in Immune Escape. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 1796–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kim, J.W.; Wieckowski, E.; Taylor, D.D.; Reichert, T.E.; Watkins, S.; Whiteside, T.L. Fas ligand-positive membranous vesicles isolated from sera of patients with oral cancer induce apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Cormier, Z. Small-molecule drug drives cancer cells to suicide. Nature 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Takeda, K.; Smyth, M.J.; Cretney, E.; Hayakawa, Y.; Yamaguchi, N.; Yagita, H.; Okumura, K. Involvement of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand in NK Cell-Mediated and IFN-γ-Dependent Suppression of Subcutaneous Tumor Growth. Cell Immunol. 2001, 214, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Kischkel, F.C.; Lawrence, D.A.; Chuntharapai, A.; Schow, P.; Kim, K.J.; Ashkenazi, A. Apo2L/TRAIL-Dependent Recruitment of Endogenous FADD and Caspase-8 to Death Receptors 4 and 5. Immunity 2000, 12, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Baker, S.J.; Reddy, E.P. Modulation of life and death by the TNF receptor superfamily. Oncogene 1998, 17, 3261–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Cullen, S.P.; Martin, S.J. Fas and TRAIL ‘death receptors’ as initiators of inflammation: Implications for cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 39, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Beyer, K.; Baukloh, A.-K.; Stoyanova, A.; Kamphues, C.; Sattler, A.; Kotsch, K. Interactions of Tumor Necrosis Factor–Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) with the Immune System: Implications for Inflammation and Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Zhang, X.; Jin, T.-G.; Yang, H.; DeWolf, W.C.; Khosravi-Far, R.; Olumi, A.F. Persistent c-FLIP(L) Expression Is Necessary and Sufficient to Maintain Resistance to Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand–Mediated Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7086–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Huang, Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, T.; Kong, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wei, Y.; Wang, G.; Chang, K.-J. Overcoming resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in solid tumor cells by simultaneously targeting death receptors, c-FLIP and IAPs. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 49, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Ke, C.; Hou, H.; Li, J.; Su, K.; Huang, C.; Lin, Y.; Lu, Z.; Du, Z.; Tan, W.; Yuan, Z. Extracellular Vesicle Delivery of TRAIL Eradicates Resistant Tumor Growth in Combination with CDK Inhibition by Dinaciclib. Cancers 2020, 12, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Qiu, Y.; Sun, J.; Qiu, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, X.; Mu, Y.; Li, K.; Wang, W. Antitumor Activity of Cabazitaxel and MSC-TRAIL Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Drug-Resistant Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 10809–10820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shamili, F.H.; Bayegi, H.R.; Salmasi, Z.; Sadri, K.; Mahmoudi, M.; Kalantari, M.; Ramezani, M.; Abnous, K. Exosomes derived from TRAIL-engineered mesenchymal stem cells with effective anti-tumor activity in a mouse melanoma model. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 549, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Rivoltini, L.; Chiodoni, C.; Squarcina, P.; Tortoreto, M.; Villa, A.; Vergani, B.; Bürdek, M.; Botti, L.; Arioli, I.; Cova, A.; et al. TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand (TRAIL)–Armed Exosomes Deliver Proapoptotic Signals to Tumor Site. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3499–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Ludwig, S.; Floros, T.; Theodoraki, M.-N.; Hong, C.-S.; Jackson, E.K.; Lang, S.; Whiteside, T.L. Suppression of Lymphocyte Functions by Plasma Exosomes Correlates with Disease Activity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4843–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Setroikromo, R.; Zhang, B.; Reis, C.R.; Mistry, R.H.; Quax, W.J. Death Receptor 5 Displayed on Extracellular Vesicles Decreases TRAIL Sensitivity of Colon Cancer Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 318. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcell.2020.00318 (accessed on 20 June 2022). [CrossRef]
  166. Tóth, E.Á.; Turiák, L.; Visnovitz, T.; Cserép, C.; Mázló, A.; Sódar, B.W.; Försönits, A.I.; Petővári, G.; Sebestyén, A.; Komlósi, Z.; et al. Formation of a protein corona on the surface of extracellular vesicles in blood plasma. J. Extracell Vesicles 2021, 10, e12140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Palviainen, M.; Saraswat, M.; Varga, Z.; Kitka, D.; Neuvonen, M.; Puhka, M.; Joenväärä, S.; Renkonen, R.; Nieuwland, R.; Takatalo, M.; et al. Extracellular vesicles from human plasma and serum are carriers of extravesicular cargo—Implications for biomarker discovery. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wolf, M.; Poupardin, R.W.; Ebner-Peking, P.; Andrade, A.C.; Blöchl, C.; Obermayer, A.; Gomes, F.G.; Vari, B.; Maeding, N.; Eminger, E.; et al. A functional corona around extracellular vesicles enhances angiogenesis, skin regeneration and immunomodulation. J. Extracell Vesicles 2022, 11, e12207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Webber, J.; Steadman, R.; Mason, M.D.; Tabi, Z.; Clayton, A. Cancer Exosomes Trigger Fibroblast to Myofibroblast Differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 9621–9630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Yen, E.-Y.; Miaw, S.-C.; Yu, J.-S.; Lai, I.-R. Exosomal TGF-β1 is correlated with lymphatic metastasis of gastric cancers. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 2199–2208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  171. Ringuette Goulet, C.; Bernard, G.; Tremblay, S.; Chabaud, S.; Bolduc, S.; Pouliot, F. Exosomes Induce Fibroblast Differentiation into Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts through TGFβ Signaling. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018, 16, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Clayton, A.; Mitchell, J.P.; Court, J.; Mason, M.D.; Tabi, Z. Human Tumor-Derived Exosomes Selectively Impair Lymphocyte Responses to Interleukin-2. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7458–7466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Rong, L.; Li, R.; Li, S.; Luo, R. Immunosuppression of breast cancer cells mediated by transforming growth factor-β in exosomes from cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Yamada, N.; Kuranaga, Y.; Kumazaki, M.; Shinohara, H.; Taniguchi, K.; Akao, Y. Colorectal cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles induce phenotypic alteration of T cells into tumor-growth supporting cells with transforming growth factor-β1-mediated suppression. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 27033–27043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Thomas, D.A.; Massagué, J. TGF-beta directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Maynard, C.L.; E Harrington, L.; Janowski, K.M.; Oliver, J.R.; Zindl, C.L.; Rudensky, A.Y.; Weaver, C. Regulatory T cells expressing interleukin 10 develop from Foxp3+ and Foxp3- precursor cells in the absence of interleukin 10. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Wan, Y.Y.; Flavell, R.A. Identifying Foxp3-expressing suppressor T cells with a bicistronic reporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5126–5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Moore, K.W.; de Waal Malefyt, R.; Coffman, R.L.; O’Garra, A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 19, 683–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Rakoff-Nahoum, S.; Hao, L.; Medzhitov, R. Role of toll-like receptors in spontaneous commensal-dependent colitis. Immunity 2006, 25, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Li, M.O.; Flavell, R.A. Contextual regulation of inflammation: A duet by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10. Immunity 2008, 28, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Levings, M.K.; Bacchetta, R.; Schulz, U.; Roncarolo, M.G. The role of IL-10 and TGF-beta in the differentiation and effector function of T regulatory cells. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2002, 129, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chaudhry, A.; Samstein, R.M.; Treuting, P.; Liang, Y.; Pils, M.C.; Heinrich, J.-M.; Jack, R.S.; Wunderlich, F.T.; Brüning, J.C.; Müller, W.; et al. Interleukin-10 signaling in regulatory T cells is required for suppression of Th17 cell-mediated inflammation. Immunity 2011, 34, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Shu, S.; Matsuzaki, J.; Want, M.Y.; Conway, A.; Benjamin-Davalos, S.; Allen, C.L.; Koroleva, M.; Battaglia, S.; Odunsi, A.; Minderman, H.; et al. An Immunosuppressive Effect of Melanoma-derived Exosomes on NY-ESO-1 Antigen-specific Human CD8+ T Cells is Dependent on IL-10 and Independent of BRAFV600E Mutation in Melanoma Cell Lines. Immunol. Invest. 2020, 49, 744–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Zhu, G.; Cao, B.; Liang, X.; Li, L.; Hao, Y.; Meng, W.; He, C.; Wang, L.; Li, L. Small extracellular vesicles containing miR-192/215 mediate hypoxia-induced cancer-associated fibroblast development in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2021, 506, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, B.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Ge, H.; Liu, Y. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-93-5p from cancer-associated fibroblasts confer radioresistance in colorectal cancer cells by downregulating FOXA1 and upregulating TGFB3. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Zhou, Y.; Ren, H.; Dai, B.; Li, J.; Shang, L.; Huang, J.; Shi, X. Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-21 contributes to tumor progression by converting hepatocyte stellate cells to cancer-associated fibroblasts. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Huang, X.; Yuan, T.; Tschannen, M.; Sun, Z.; Jacob, H.; Du, M.; Liang, M.; Dittmar, R.L.; Liu, Y.; Liang, M.; et al. Characterization of human plasma-derived exosomal RNAs by deep sequencing. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. van Balkom, B.W.M.; Eisele, A.S.; Pegtel, D.M.; Bervoets, S.; Verhaar, M.C. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of small RNAs in human endothelial cells and exosomes provides insights into localized RNA processing, degradation and sorting. J. Extracell Vesicles 2015, 4, 26760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Melo, S.A.; Sugimoto, H.; O’Connell, J.T.; Kato, N.; Villanueva, A.; Vidal, A.; Qiu, L.; Vitkin, E.; Perelman, L.T.; Melo, C.A.; et al. Cancer Exosomes Perform Cell-Independent MicroRNA Biogenesis and Promote Tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Skog, J.; Würdinger, T.; Van Rijn, S.; Meijer, D.H.; Gainche, L.; Curry, W.T., Jr.; Carter, B.S.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Breakefield, X.O. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Pegtel, D.M.; Cosmopoulos, K.; Thorley-Lawson, D.A.; van Eijndhoven, M.A.J.; Hopmans, E.S.; Lindenberg, J.L.; de Gruijl, T.D.; Würdinger, T.; Middeldorp, J.M. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6328–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Deregibus, M.C.; Cantaluppi, V.; Calogero, R.; Lo Iacono, M.; Tetta, C.; Biancone, L.; Bruno, S.; Bussolati, B.; Camussi, G. Endothelial progenitor cell derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood 2007, 110, 2440–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Buschmann, D.; Kirchner, B.; Hermann, S.; Märte, M.; Wurmser, C.; Brandes, F.; Kotschote, S.; Bonin, M.; Steinlein, O.K.; Pfaffl, M.W.; et al. Evaluation of serum extracellular vesicle isolation methods for profiling miRNAs by next-generation sequencing. J. Extracell Vesicles 2018, 7, 1481321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Wagner, J.; Riwanto, M.; Besler, C.; Knau, A.; Fichtlscherer, S.; Röxe, T.; Zeiher, A.M.; Landmesser, U.; Dimmeler, S. Characterization of levels and cellular transfer of circulating lipoprotein-bound microRNAs. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Cui, M.; Wang, H.; Yao, X.; Zhang, D.; Xie, Y.; Cui, R.; Zhang, X. Circulating MicroRNAs in Cancer: Potential and Challenge. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Mutant p53 Cancers Reprogram Macrophages to Tumor Supporting Macrophages via Exosomal miR-1246 | Nature Communications. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03224-w (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  198. Chen, X.; Ying, X.; Wang, X.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, X. Exosomes derived from hypoxic epithelial ovarian cancer deliver microRNA-940 to induce macrophage M2 polarization. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Ying, X.; Wu, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, X.; Jiang, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, X. Epithelial ovarian cancer-secreted exosomal miR-222-3p induces polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 43076–43087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Cai, J.; Qiao, B.; Gao, N.; Lin, N.; He, W. Oral squamous cell carcinoma-derived exosomes promote M2 subtype macrophage polarization mediated by exosome-enclosed miR-29a-3p. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2019, 316, C731–C740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Lin, F.; Yin, H.-B.; Li, X.-Y.; Zhu, G.-M.; He, W.-Y.; Gou, X. Bladder cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-21 activates the PI3K/AKT pathway in macrophages to promote cancer progression. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 56, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. van der Vos, K.E.; Abels, E.R.; Zhang, X.; Lai, C.; Carrizosa, E.; Oakley, D.; Prabhakar, S.; Mardini, O.; Crommentuijn, M.H.; Skog, J.; et al. Directly visualized glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles transfer RNA to microglia/macrophages in the brain. Neuro-Oncology 2016, 18, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Pyzer, A.R.; Stroopinsky, D.; Rajabi, H.; Washington, A.; Tagde, A.; Coll, M.; Fung, J.; Bryant, M.P.; Cole, L.; Palmer, K.; et al. MUC1-mediated induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017, 129, 1791–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Fabbri, M.; Paone, A.; Calore, F.; Galli, R.; Gaudio, E.; Santhanam, R.; Lovat, F.; Fadda, P.; Mao, C.; Nuovo, G.J.; et al. MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2110–E2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Casadei, L.; Calore, F.; Creighton, C.J.; Guescini, M.; Batte, K.; Iwenofu, O.H.; Zewdu, A.; Braggio, D.A.; Bill, K.L.; Fadda, P.; et al. Exosome-Derived miR-25-3p and miR-92a-3p Stimulate Liposarcoma Progression. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3846–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Gantier, M.; Tong, S.; Behlke, M.; Xu, D.; Phipps, S.; Foster, P.S.; Williams, B. TLR7 is involved in sequence-specific sensing of single-stranded RNAs in human macrophages. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md. 1950 2008, 180, 2117–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Zhang, Z.; Ohto, U.; Shibata, T.; Taoka, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Sato, R.; Shukla, N.M.; David, S.A.; Isobe, T.; Miyake, K.; et al. Structural Analyses of Toll-like Receptor 7 Reveal Detailed RNA Sequence Specificity and Recognition Mechanism of Agonistic Ligands. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 3371–3381.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Zhao, X.; Yuan, C.; Wangmo, D.; Subramanian, S. Tumor-Secreted Extracellular Vesicles Regulate T-Cell Costimulation and Can Be Manipulated To Induce Tumor-Specific T-Cell Responses. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 560–574.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Zhou, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, L.; Chen, W.; Ding, G.; Cao, L. Pancreatic cancer derived exosomes regulate the expression of TLR4 in dendritic cells via miR-203. Cell Immunol. 2014, 292, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ding, G.; Zhou, L.; Qian, Y.; Fu, M.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Xiang, J.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, G.; Cao, L. Pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes transfer miRNAs to dendritic cells and inhibit RFXAP expression via miR-212-3p. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 29877–29888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Yin, Y.; Cai, X.; Chen, X.; Liang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Yokoyama, S.; et al. Tumor-secreted miR-214 induces regulatory T cells: A major link between immune evasion and tumor growth. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1164–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yu, S.; Li, Y.; Liao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Qian, L.; Zhao, J.; Zong, H.; Kang, B.; et al. Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNA profiling identifies a diagnostic signature for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2020, 69, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Li, Z.; Jiang, P.; Li, J.; Peng, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, K.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Gan, L.; et al. Tumor-derived exosomal lnc-Sox2ot promotes EMT and stemness by acting as a ceRNA in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncogene 2018, 37, 3822–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Ghetti, M.; Vannini, I.; Storlazzi, C.T.; Martinelli, G.; Simonetti, G. Linear and circular PVT1 in hematological malignancies and immune response: Two faces of the same coin. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Lu, D.; Luo, P.; Wang, Q.; Ye, Y.; Wang, B. lncRNA PVT1 in cancer: A review and meta-analysis. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2017, 474, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Zheng, Y.; Tian, X.; Wang, T.; Xia, X.; Cao, F.; Tian, J.; Xu, P.; Ma, J.; Xu, H.; Wang, S. Long noncoding RNA Pvt1 regulates the immunosuppression activity of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. El-Khazragy, N.; Elayat, W.; Matbouly, S.; Seliman, S.; Sami, A.; Safwat, G.; Diab, A. The prognostic significance of the long non-coding RNAs ‘CCAT1, PVT1’ in t(8;21) associated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Gene 2019, 707, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Chen, Y.; Li, F.; Li, D.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L. Atezolizumab and blockade of LncRNA PVT1 attenuate cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer cells progression synergistically via JAK2/STAT3/PD-L1 pathway. Clin. Immunol. 2021, 227, 108728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Iden, M.; Fye, S.; Li, K.; Chowdhury, T.; Ramchandran, R.; Rader, J.S. The lncRNA PVT1 Contributes to the Cervical Cancer Phenotype and Associates with Poor Patient Prognosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Fan, H.; Zhu, J.; Yao, X. Long non-coding RNA PVT1 as a novel potential biomarker for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2018, 33, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Mizuno, S.; Hanamura, I.; Ota, A.; Karnan, S.; Kanasugi, J.; Nakamura, A.; Takasugi, S.; Uchino, K.; Horio, T.; Goto, M.; et al. Establishment and characterization of a novel vincristine-resistant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell line containing the 8q24 homogeneously staining region. FEBS Open Bio. 2018, 8, 1977–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Guo, K.; Yao, J.; Yu, Q.; Li, Z.; Huang, H.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Y. The expression pattern of long non-coding RNA PVT1 in tumor tissues and in extracellular vesicles of colorectal cancer correlates with cancer progression. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc Oncodevelopmental. Biol. Med. 2017, 39, 1010428317699122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Lai, S.W.; Chen, M.Y.; Bamodu, O.A.; Hsieh, M.S.; Huang, T.Y.; Yeh, C.T.; Lee, W.H.; Cherng, Y.G. Exosomal lncRNA PVT1/VEGFA Axis Promotes Colon Cancer Metastasis and Stemness by Downregulation of Tumor Suppressor miR-152-3p. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 9959807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Sun, C.; Wang, P.; Dong, W.; Liu, H.; Sun, J.; Zhao, L. LncRNA PVT1 promotes exosome secretion through YKT6, RAB7, and VAMP3 in pancreatic cancer. Aging 2020, 12, 10427–10440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Chen, F.; Chen, J.; Yang, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tu, Q.; Yin, D.; Lin, D.; Wong, P.P.; et al. Extracellular vesicle-packaged HIF-1α-stabilizing lncRNA from tumour-associated macrophages regulates aerobic glycolysis of breast cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Dallavalle, S.; Dobričić, V.; Lazzarato, L.; Gazzano, E.; Machuqueiro, M.; Pajeva, I.; Tsakovska, I.; Zidar, N.; Fruttero, R. Improvement of conventional anti-cancer drugs as new tools against multidrug resistant tumors. Drug Resist. Updates 2020, 50, 100682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Battista, T.; Fiorillo, A.; Chiarini, V.; Genovese, I.; Ilari, A.; Colotti, G. Roles of Sorcin in Drug Resistance in Cancer: One Protein, Many Mechanisms, for a Novel Potential Anticancer Drug Target. Cancers 2020, 12, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  228. Navas, T.; Kinders, R.J.; Lawrence, S.M.; Ferry-Galow, K.V.; Borgel, S.; Hollingshead, M.G.; Srivastava, A.K.; Alcoser, S.Y.; Makhlouf, H.R.; Chuaqui, R.; et al. Clinical Evolution of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 304–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Garcia-Mayea, Y.; Mir, C.; Masson, F.; Paciucci, R.; LLeonart, M.E. Insights into new mechanisms and models of cancer stem cell multidrug resistance. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020, 60, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Dean, M.; Rzhetsky, A.; Allikmets, R. The human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. Genome Res. 2001, 11, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Mansoori, B.; Mohammadi, A.; Davudian, S.; Shirjang, S.; Baradaran, B. The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Yoshimori, M.; Takada, H.; Imadome, K.I.; Kurata, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Koyama, T.; Shimizu, N.; Fujiwara, S.; Miura, O.; Arai, A. P-glycoprotein is expressed and causes resistance to chemotherapy in EBV-positive T-cell lymphoproliferative diseases. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 1494–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Ling, L.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, W.; Hong, S.; Tang, X.; Zhao, P.; Li, M.; Ni, J.; Li, C.; Wang, L.; et al. Circulating and tumor-infiltrating mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in colorectal cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Goldstein, L.J.; Galski, H.; Fojo, A.; Willingham, M.; Lai, S.-L.; Gazdar, A.; Pirker, R.; Green, A.; Crist, W.; Brodeur, G.M.; et al. Expression of a multidrug resistance gene in human cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989, 81, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Torreggiani, E.; Roncuzzi, L.; Perut, F.; Zini, N.; Baldini, N. Multimodal transfer of MDR by exosomes in human osteosarcoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 49, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Zhu, H.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Evans, B.R.; Medina, D.J.; Liu, C.G.; Yang, J.M. Role of MicroRNA miR-27a and miR-451 in the regulation of MDR1/P-glycoprotein expression in human cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  237. Kovalchuk, O.; Filkowski, J.; Meservy, J.; Ilnytskyy, Y.; Tryndyak, V.P.; Chekhun, V.F.; Pogribny, I.P. Involvement of microRNA-451 in resistance of the MCF-7 breast cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 2152–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  238. Ghandadi, M.; Sahebkar, A. Interleukin-6, A Critical Cytokine in Cancer Multidrug Resistance. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Wang, Y.; Niu, X.L.; Qu, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Y.Q.; Sun, W.J.; Li, L.Z. Autocrine production of interleukin-6 confers cisplatin and paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 295, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Goulet, C.R.; Champagne, A.; Bernard, G.; Vandal, D.; Chabaud, S.; Pouliot, F.; Bolduc, S. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial–mesenchymal transition of bladder cancer cells through paracrine IL-6 signalling. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  241. Zhao, Q.; Huang, L.; Qin, G.; Qiao, Y.; Ren, F.; Shen, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, S.; Lian, J.; Wang, D.; et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell generation via IL-6/exosomal miR-21-activated STAT3 signaling to promote cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2021, 518, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Yu, S.; Liu, C.; Su, K.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, C.; Cong, Y.; Kimberly, R.; Grizzle, W.E.; et al. Tumor Exosomes Inhibit Differentiation of Bone Marrow Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6867–6875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Binenbaum, Y.; Fridman, E.; Yaari, Z.; Milman, N.; Schroeder, A.; Ben David, G.; Shlomi, T.; Gil, Z. Transfer of miRNA in Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Induces Drug Resistance in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 5287–5299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  244. Pavlyukov, M.S.; Yu, H.; Bastola, S.; Minata, M.; Shender, V.O.; Lee, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Komarova, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Apoptotic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Malignancy of Glioblastoma Via Intercellular Transfer of Splicing Factors. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 119–135.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  245. Hui, E.; Cheung, J.; Zhu, J.; Su, X.; Taylor, M.J.; Wallweber, H.A.; Sasmal, D.K.; Huang, J.; Kim, J.M.; Mellman, I.; et al. T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1–mediated inhibition. Science 2017, 355, 1428–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Prat, A.; Navarro, A.; Paré, L.; Reguart, N.; Galván, P.; Pascual, T.; Martínez, A.; Nuciforo, P.; Comerma, L.; Alos, L.; et al. Immune-Related Gene Expression Profiling After PD-1 Blockade in Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, and Melanoma. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3540–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Aung, T.; Chapuy, B.; Vogel, D.; Wenzel, D.; Oppermann, M.; Lahmann, M.; Weinhage, T.; Menck, K.; Hupfeld, T.; Koch, R.; et al. Exosomal evasion of humoral immunotherapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma modulated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15336–15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  248. Ciravolo, V.; Huber, V.; Ghedini, G.C.; Venturelli, E.; Bianchi, F.; Campiglio, M.; Morelli, D.; Villa, A.; Della Mina, P.; Menard, S.; et al. Potential role of HER2-overexpressing exosomes in countering trastuzumab-based therapy. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Lorusso, G.; Rüegg, C. The tumor microenvironment and its contribution to tumor evolution toward metastasis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Hida, K.; Maishi, N.; Annan, D.A.; Hida, Y. Contribution of Tumor Endothelial Cells in Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Nieman, K.M.; Romero, I.L.; Van Houten, B.; Lengyel, E. Adipose tissue and adipocytes support tumorigenesis and metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2013, 1831, 1533–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Nieman, K.M.; Kenny, H.A.; Penicka, C.V.; Ladanyi, A.; Buell-Gutbrod, R.; Zillhardt, M.R.; Romero, I.L.; Carey, M.S.; Mills, G.B.; Hotamisligil, G.S.; et al. Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1498–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Luo, Y.; Zhou, H.; Krueger, J.; Kaplan, C.; Lee, S.-H.; Dolman, C.; Markowitz, D.; Wu, W.; Liu, C.; Reisfeld, R.A.; et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages as a novel strategy against breast cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 2132–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  254. Ostrand-Rosenberg, S.; Sinha, P. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Linking Inflammation and Cancer. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4499–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Pyfferoen, L.; Brabants, E.; Everaert, C.; De Cabooter, N.; Heyns, K.; Deswarte, K.; Vanheerswynghels, M.; De Prijck, S.; Waegemans, G.; Dullaers, M.; et al. The transcriptome of lung tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells reveals a tumor-supporting phenotype and a microRNA signature with negative impact on clinical outcome. OncoImmunology 2017, 6, e1253655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  256. Lu, H.; Clauser, K.R.; Tam, W.L.; Frose, J.; Ye, X.; Eaton, E.N.; Reinhardt, F.; Donnenberg, V.S.; Bhargava, R.; Carr, S.A.; et al. A breast cancer stem cell niche supported by juxtacrine signalling from monocytes and macrophages. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  257. Raskov, H.; Orhan, A.; Christensen, J.P.; Gögenur, I. Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in cancer and cancer immunotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Beyer, M.; Schultze, J.L. Regulatory T cells in cancer. Blood 2006, 108, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  259. Inoue, S.; Leitner, W.W.; Golding, B.; Scott, D. Inhibitory Effects of B Cells on Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7741–7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Neo, S.Y.; Yang, Y.; Record, J.; Ma, R.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.; Tobin, N.; Blake, E.; Seitz, C.; Thomas, R.; et al. CD73 immune checkpoint defines regulatory NK cells within the tumor microenvironment. J. Clin. Invest. 2020, 130, 1185–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  261. GJG, S.; Wurdinger, T. Tumor-educated platelets. Blood 2019, 133, 2359–2364. [Google Scholar]
  262. Madeo, M.; Colbert, P.L.; Vermeer, D.W.; Lucido, C.T.; Cain, J.T.; Vichaya, E.G.; Grossberg, A.J.; Muirhead, D.; Rickel, A.P.; Hong, Z.; et al. Cancer exosomes induce tumor innervation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Hong, C.-S.; Funk, S.; Muller, L.; Boyiadzis, M.; Whiteside, T.L. Isolation of biologically active and morphologically intact exosomes from plasma of patients with cancer. J. Extracell Vesicles 2016, 5, 29289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Heijnen, H.F.; Schiel, A.E.; Fijnheer, R.; Geuze, H.J.; Sixma, J.J. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: Microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood 1999, 94, 3791–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Stone, R.L.; Nick, A.M.; McNeish, I.A.; Balkwill, F.; Han, H.D.; Bottsford-Miller, J.; Rupaimoole, R.; Armaiz-Pena, G.N.; Pecot, C.V.; Coward, J.; et al. Paraneoplastic thrombocytosis in ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  266. Lannan, K.L.; Sahler, J.; Kim, N.; Spinelli, S.L.; Maggirwar, S.B.; Garraud, O.; Cognasse, F.; Blumberg, N.; Phipps, R.P. Breaking the Mold: Transcription Factors in the Anucleate Platelet and Platelet-Derived Microparticles. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 203. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00048 (accessed on 8 June 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  267. Denis, M.M.; Tolley, N.D.; Bunting, M.; Schwertz, H.; Jiang, H.; Lindemann, S.; Yost, C.C.; Rubner, F.J.; Albertine, K.H.; Swoboda, K.J.; et al. Escaping the Nuclear Confines: Signal-Dependent Pre-mRNA Splicing in Anucleate Platelets. Cell 2005, 122, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  268. Nassa, G.; Giurato, G.; Cimmino, G.; Rizzo, F.; Ravo, M.; Salvati, A.; Nyman, T.A.; Zhu, Y.; Vesterlund, M.; Lehtiö, J.; et al. Splicing of platelet resident pre-mRNAs upon activation by physiological stimuli results in functionally relevant proteome modifications. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  269. Nilsson, R.J.A.; Balaj, L.; Hulleman, E.; Van Rijn, S.; Pegtel, D.M.; Walraven, M.; Widmark, A.; Gerritsen, W.R.; Verheul, H.M.; Vandertop, W.P.; et al. Blood platelets contain tumor-derived RNA biomarkers. Blood 2011, 118, 3680–3683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Calverley, D.C.; Phang, T.L.; Choudhury, Q.G.; Gao, B.; Oton, A.B.; Weyant, M.J.; Geraci, M.W. Significant downregulation of platelet gene expression in metastatic lung cancer. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2010, 3, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Best, M.G.; Sol, N.; Kooi, I.E.; Tannous, J.; Westerman, B.A.; Rustenburg, F.; Schellen, P.; Verschueren, H.; Post, E.; Koster, J.; et al. RNA-Seq of Tumor-Educated Platelets Enables Blood-Based Pan-Cancer, Multiclass, and Molecular Pathway Cancer Diagnostics. Cancer Cell 2015, 28, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  272. Best, M.G.; Sol, N.; GJG, S.; Vancura, A.; Muller, M.; Niemeijer, A.L.N.; Fejes, A.V.; Fat, L.A.T.K.; Huis, A.E.; Leurs, C.; et al. Swarm Intelligence-Enhanced Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Tumor-Educated Platelets. Cancer Cell 2017, 32, 238–252.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Flaumenhaft, R. Formation and fate of platelet microparticles. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2006, 36, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Varon, D.; Shai, E. Role of platelet-derived microparticles in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Discov. Med. 2009, 8, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  275. Lazar, S.; Goldfinger, L.E. Platelets and extracellular vesicles and their cross talk with cancer. Blood 2021, 137, 3192–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Żmigrodzka, M.; Guzera, M.; Miśkiewicz, A.; Jagielski, D.; Winnicka, A. The biology of extracellular vesicles with focus on platelet microparticles and their role in cancer development and progression. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 14391–14401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  277. Janowska-Wieczorek, A.; Wysoczynski, M.; Kijowski, J.; Marquez-Curtis, L.; Machalinski, B.; Ratajczak, J.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Microvesicles derived from activated platelets induce metastasis and angiogenesis in lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Labelle, M.; Begum, S.; Hynes, R.O. Direct signaling between platelets and cancer cells induces an epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and promotes metastasis. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  279. Lopatina, T.; Grange, C.; Cavallari, C.; Navarro-Tableros, V.; Lombardo, G.; Rosso, A.; Cedrino, M.; Pomatto, M.A.C.; Koni, M.; Veneziano, F.; et al. Targeting IL-3Rα on tumor-derived endothelial cells blunts metastatic spread of triple-negative breast cancer via extracellular vesicle reprogramming. Oncogenesis 2020, 9, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Lombardo, G.; Gili, M.; Grange, C.; Cavallari, C.; Dentelli, P.; Togliatto, G.; Taverna, D.; Camussi, G.; Brizzi, M.F. IL-3R-alpha blockade inhibits tumor endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicle (EV)-mediated vessel formation by targeting the β-catenin pathway. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1175–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  281. Lopatina, T.; Koni, M.; Grange, C.; Cedrino, M.; Femminò, S.; Lombardo, G.; Favaro, E.; Brizzi, M.F. IL-3 signalling in the tumour microenvironment shapes the immune response via tumour endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 179, 106206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. André, F.; Chaput, N.; Schartz, N.E.C.; Flament, C.; Aubert, N.; Bernard, J.; Lemonnier, F.; Raposo, G.; Escudier, B.; Hsu, D.-H.; et al. Exosomes as Potent Cell-Free Peptide-Based Vaccine. I. Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes Transfer Functional MHC Class I/Peptide Complexes to Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 2126–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Lindenbergh, M.F.S.; Stoorvogel, W. Antigen Presentation by Extracellular Vesicles from Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 435–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Escudier, B.; Dorval, T.; Chaput, N.; André, F.; Caby, M.P.; Novault, S.; Flament, C.; Leboulaire, C.; Borg, C.; Amigorena, S.; et al. Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes, results of thefirst phase I clinical trial. J. Transl. Med. 2005, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  285. Morse, M.A.; Garst, J.; Osada, T.; Khan, S.; Hobeika, A.; Clay, T.M.; Valente, N.; Shreeniwas, R.; Sutton, M.A.; Delcayre, A.; et al. A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2005, 3, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  286. Segura, E.; Amigorena, S.; Théry, C. Mature dendritic cells secrete exosomes with strong ability to induce antigen-specific effector immune responses. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2005, 35, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Nikfarjam, S.; Rezaie, J.; Kashanchi, F.; Jafari, R. Dexosomes as a cell-free vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. CR 2020, 39, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Xiang, X.; Poliakov, A.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Deng, Z.-B.; Wang, J.; Cheng, Z.; Shah, S.V.; Wang, G.-J.; Zhang, L.; et al. Induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by tumor exosomes. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 2621–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  289. Valenti, R.; Huber, V.; Filipazzi, P.; Pilla, L.; Sovena, G.; Villa, A.; Corbelli, A.; Fais, S.; Parmiani, G.; Rivoltini, L. Human Tumor-Released Microvesicles Promote the Differentiation of Myeloid Cells with Transforming Growth Factor-β–Mediated Suppressive Activity on T Lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 9290–9298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  290. de Paula Silva, E.; Marti, L.C.; Andreghetto, F.M.; de Sales, R.O.; Hoberman, M.; dos Santos Dias, B.; Diniz, L.F.A.; Dos Santos, A.M.; Moyses, R.A.; Curioni, O.A.; et al. Extracellular vesicles cargo from head and neck cancer cell lines disrupt dendritic cells function and match plasma microRNAs. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Zitvogel, L.; Regnault, A.; Lozier, A.; Wolfers, J.; Flament, C.; Tenza, D.; Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.; Raposo, G.; Amigorena, S. Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel cell-free vaccine: Dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Fu, C.; Peng, P.; Loschko, J.; Feng, L.; Pham, P.; Cui, W.; Lee, K.P.; Krug, A.B.; Jiang, A. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells cross-prime naive CD8 T cells by transferring antigen to conventional dendritic cells through exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 23730–23741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Viaud, S.; Ploix, S.; Lapierre, V.; Théry, C.; Commere, P.-H.; Tramalloni, D.; Gorrichon, K.; Virault-Rocroy, P.; Tursz, T.; Lantz, O.; et al. Updated Technology to Produce Highly Immunogenic Dendritic Cell-derived Exosomes of Clinical Grade: A Critical Role of Interferon-γ. J. Immunother. 2011, 34, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Pan, B.T.; Johnstone, R.M. Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: Selective externalization of the receptor. Cell 1983, 33, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Barz, D.; Goppelt, M.; Szamel, M.; Schirrmacher, V.; Resch, K. Characterization of cellular and extracellular plasma membrane vesicles from a non-metastasizing lymphoma (Eb) and its metastasizing variant (ESb). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 814, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Schirrmacher, V.; Barz, D. Characterization of cellular and extracellular plasma membrane vesicles from a low metastatic lymphoma (Eb) and its high metastatic variant (ESb): Inhibitory capacity in cell-cell interaction systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 860, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Raposo, G.; Nijman, H.W.; Stoorvogel, W.; Liejendekker, R.; Harding, C.V.; Melief, C.J.; Geuze, H.J. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Andre, F.; Schartz, N.E.; Movassagh, M.; Flament, C.; Pautier, P.; Morice, P.; Pomel, C.; Lhomme, C.; Escudier, B.; Le Chevalier, T.; et al. Malignant effusions and immunogenic tumour-derived exosomes. Lancet 2002, 360, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Chaput, N.; Schartz, N.E.C.; Andre, F.; Taïeb, J.; Novault, S.; Bonnaventure, P.; Aubert, N.; Bernard, J.; Lemonnier, F.; Merad, M.; et al. Exosomes as potent cell-free peptide-based vaccine. II. Exosomes in CpG adjuvants efficiently prime naive Tc1 lymphocytes leading to tumor rejection. J. Immunol. Baltim. Md. 1950 2004, 172, 2137–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  300. Altieri, S.L.; Khan, A.N.H.; Tomasi, T.B. Exosomes from plasmacytoma cells as a tumor vaccine. J. Immunother. Hagerstown Md. 1997 2004, 27, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Peinado, H.; Alečković, M.; Lavotshkin, S.; Matei, I.; Costa-Silva, B.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Hergueta-Redondo, M.; Williams, C.; García-Santos, G.; Ghajar, C.M.; et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. TEV markers relevant for immune regulation. TEV from cancer cells regulate the immune system by acting on different cell types. In particular, TEV express a large subset of molecules able to trigger tumour immune evasion. Indeed, the interaction between ICAM-1, embedded within tetraspanin domains (CD63, CD81 and CD9) in TEV and LFA1 in leucocytes, is essential for TEV uptake by leucocytes. Moreover, the cross talk between TEV DAMPs/PAMPs and dsDNA/RNA molecules and TLR in tumour cells stimulates the expression of genes involved in immune suppression. However, TLR can be also carried by TEV initiating signalling that impairs the antitumour immune response. Furthermore, HSP70 in TEV interacts with TLR2 on MDSC, boosting p-STAT3 expression and IL-6 production, while HSP27/60 interacting with TLR in TAM promotes differentiation of pro-tumoural M2 and the production of immune suppressive factors. α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins in TEV interact with fibronectin on fibroblasts and mediate signalling in recipient cells, supporting organotrophic metastatic spread. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Figure 1. TEV markers relevant for immune regulation. TEV from cancer cells regulate the immune system by acting on different cell types. In particular, TEV express a large subset of molecules able to trigger tumour immune evasion. Indeed, the interaction between ICAM-1, embedded within tetraspanin domains (CD63, CD81 and CD9) in TEV and LFA1 in leucocytes, is essential for TEV uptake by leucocytes. Moreover, the cross talk between TEV DAMPs/PAMPs and dsDNA/RNA molecules and TLR in tumour cells stimulates the expression of genes involved in immune suppression. However, TLR can be also carried by TEV initiating signalling that impairs the antitumour immune response. Furthermore, HSP70 in TEV interacts with TLR2 on MDSC, boosting p-STAT3 expression and IL-6 production, while HSP27/60 interacting with TLR in TAM promotes differentiation of pro-tumoural M2 and the production of immune suppressive factors. α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins in TEV interact with fibronectin on fibroblasts and mediate signalling in recipient cells, supporting organotrophic metastatic spread. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Cancers 14 04020 g001
Figure 2. TEV as immunosuppressive shuttles. TEV from tumour cells carry various immune checkpoint molecules, which impair the antitumour immune response. In particular, activated T-cell producing IFNγ and TNFα enhance PD-L1 expression in tumour cells, which in turn secrete TEV expressing PD-L1, which interacting with PD-1, interferes with effector T-cell activity and drives Treg expansion. As PD-1, CTLA4 after binding to TEV expressing CD80/CD86 suppresses the immune response and T-cell-mediated cytotoxic activity. On the other hand, TEV carrying CTLA4 boost CD80/CD86 scavenging and induce proliferation of targeted tumour cells. Moreover, TIM-3+ TEV are uptaken by TAM and induce M2 polarisation. Similarly, CD73+ TEV upregulate the expression of immunosuppressive factors in TAM by activating the NF-κB pathway. Furthermore, FasL and TRAIL TEV content has immunosuppressive factors, by binding receptors Fas and TRAIL-R1/2, respectively, to immune cells, thereby promoting target cell apoptosis. In addition, FasL interaction with c-FLIP expressed by tumour cells promotes tumour invasiveness and metastasis formation. The so-called “Protein corona” describes the presence of TEV membrane proteins artificially linked to the membrane of TEV or naturally linked to their receptors. IL-10 and TGFβ expressed by TEV boost the immune suppression. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Figure 2. TEV as immunosuppressive shuttles. TEV from tumour cells carry various immune checkpoint molecules, which impair the antitumour immune response. In particular, activated T-cell producing IFNγ and TNFα enhance PD-L1 expression in tumour cells, which in turn secrete TEV expressing PD-L1, which interacting with PD-1, interferes with effector T-cell activity and drives Treg expansion. As PD-1, CTLA4 after binding to TEV expressing CD80/CD86 suppresses the immune response and T-cell-mediated cytotoxic activity. On the other hand, TEV carrying CTLA4 boost CD80/CD86 scavenging and induce proliferation of targeted tumour cells. Moreover, TIM-3+ TEV are uptaken by TAM and induce M2 polarisation. Similarly, CD73+ TEV upregulate the expression of immunosuppressive factors in TAM by activating the NF-κB pathway. Furthermore, FasL and TRAIL TEV content has immunosuppressive factors, by binding receptors Fas and TRAIL-R1/2, respectively, to immune cells, thereby promoting target cell apoptosis. In addition, FasL interaction with c-FLIP expressed by tumour cells promotes tumour invasiveness and metastasis formation. The so-called “Protein corona” describes the presence of TEV membrane proteins artificially linked to the membrane of TEV or naturally linked to their receptors. IL-10 and TGFβ expressed by TEV boost the immune suppression. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Cancers 14 04020 g002
Figure 3. TEV non-coding RNA content. TEV contain and deliver a large subset of microRNAs and lncRNAs involved in immune suppression. In particular, specific miRNAs act on specific cell type. Indeed, miR-1246 and miR-940 (colon cancer), miR-222 (ovarian cancer), miR-29a-3p (oral squamous cell carcinoma), miR-21-5p (bladder cancer), miR-503 (glioblastoma), miR-25 and miR-92a (liposarcoma) stimulate macrophages to shift towards M2 phenotype. On the other hand, TEV derived from M2 macrophage carrying miR-365 (pancreatic cancer) and lncRNA HISLA (breast cancer) promote aerobic glycolysis and resistance to apoptosis in tumour cells. miR-424 (colorectal cancer) induces resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in tumour infiltrating DC and T-cells. Interestingly, miR-203 (pancreatic cancer) inhibits the expression of TLR4, while miR-212 modulates the expression of MHC II in recipient DC, which in turn induces a suppressive phenotype and inhibits T-cell cytotoxic activity. miR-214 (Lewis lung cancer) promotes the shift of T-cells towards Treg supporting immune suppression. Moreover, lncRNA-PVT1 (Lewis lung cancer) contributes to suppression CTL and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. However, miRNAs also play a crucial role in drug resistance. Thus, miR-451 and miR-27a (ovarian cancer) enhance IL-6-mediated drug resistance, miR-365 (pancreatic cancer) induces gemcitabine resistance, while miR-1246 (colorectal cancer) upregulates p-gp to boost drug efflux. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Figure 3. TEV non-coding RNA content. TEV contain and deliver a large subset of microRNAs and lncRNAs involved in immune suppression. In particular, specific miRNAs act on specific cell type. Indeed, miR-1246 and miR-940 (colon cancer), miR-222 (ovarian cancer), miR-29a-3p (oral squamous cell carcinoma), miR-21-5p (bladder cancer), miR-503 (glioblastoma), miR-25 and miR-92a (liposarcoma) stimulate macrophages to shift towards M2 phenotype. On the other hand, TEV derived from M2 macrophage carrying miR-365 (pancreatic cancer) and lncRNA HISLA (breast cancer) promote aerobic glycolysis and resistance to apoptosis in tumour cells. miR-424 (colorectal cancer) induces resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in tumour infiltrating DC and T-cells. Interestingly, miR-203 (pancreatic cancer) inhibits the expression of TLR4, while miR-212 modulates the expression of MHC II in recipient DC, which in turn induces a suppressive phenotype and inhibits T-cell cytotoxic activity. miR-214 (Lewis lung cancer) promotes the shift of T-cells towards Treg supporting immune suppression. Moreover, lncRNA-PVT1 (Lewis lung cancer) contributes to suppression CTL and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. However, miRNAs also play a crucial role in drug resistance. Thus, miR-451 and miR-27a (ovarian cancer) enhance IL-6-mediated drug resistance, miR-365 (pancreatic cancer) induces gemcitabine resistance, while miR-1246 (colorectal cancer) upregulates p-gp to boost drug efflux. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Cancers 14 04020 g003
Figure 4. TEV released by tumour-educated platelets and tumour endothelial cells. Tumour-educated platelets produce TEV, expressing P-selectin (CD62P) and integrin αIIbβ3, stimulate MAPK p42/44 and AKT, and increase the expression of MMP1, MMP9, VEGF and cyclin D2. Moreover, TEV induce EMT by activating TGFβ1 and NF-κB signalling in tumour cells. All these signals increase angiogenesis, metastasis formation and drug resistance. On the other hand, TEC-derived TEV contain pro-oncogenic proteins and RNAs involved in immune regulation (TGFβ1, HLA-G, IL-6, M-CSF, as well as lncRNA MALAT1, and miR-24-3p), which, by increasing PD-L1 in tumour cells, boost cancer outgrowth, metastatic spread and immunosuppression. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Figure 4. TEV released by tumour-educated platelets and tumour endothelial cells. Tumour-educated platelets produce TEV, expressing P-selectin (CD62P) and integrin αIIbβ3, stimulate MAPK p42/44 and AKT, and increase the expression of MMP1, MMP9, VEGF and cyclin D2. Moreover, TEV induce EMT by activating TGFβ1 and NF-κB signalling in tumour cells. All these signals increase angiogenesis, metastasis formation and drug resistance. On the other hand, TEC-derived TEV contain pro-oncogenic proteins and RNAs involved in immune regulation (TGFβ1, HLA-G, IL-6, M-CSF, as well as lncRNA MALAT1, and miR-24-3p), which, by increasing PD-L1 in tumour cells, boost cancer outgrowth, metastatic spread and immunosuppression. https://smart.servier.com (access on 15 August 2022).
Cancers 14 04020 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopatina, T.; Sarcinella, A.; Brizzi, M.F. Tumour Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenging Target to Blunt Tumour Immune Evasion. Cancers 2022, 14, 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164020

AMA Style

Lopatina T, Sarcinella A, Brizzi MF. Tumour Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenging Target to Blunt Tumour Immune Evasion. Cancers. 2022; 14(16):4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopatina, Tatiana, Alessandro Sarcinella, and Maria Felice Brizzi. 2022. "Tumour Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenging Target to Blunt Tumour Immune Evasion" Cancers 14, no. 16: 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164020

APA Style

Lopatina, T., Sarcinella, A., & Brizzi, M. F. (2022). Tumour Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Challenging Target to Blunt Tumour Immune Evasion. Cancers, 14(16), 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop