The authors would like to make a correction to their published paper [1].
There was a mistake in the original version of the article in Figures 1 and 2. We found that Figures 1 and 2 were misplaced in the article.
Figure 1.
Selection criteria for the subjects.
Figure 2.
Histological patterns of lung adenocarcinoma. Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained biopsy specimens: (A) lepidic-predominant pattern; (B) acinar-predominant pattern; (C) papillary-predominant pattern; (D) solid-predominant pattern; and (E) micropapillary-predominant pattern.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Reference
- Weng, C.-F.; Huang, C.-J.; Huang, S.-H.; Wu, M.-H.; Tseng, A.H.; Sung, Y.-C.; Lee, H.H.-C.; Ling, T.-Y. New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Pathology Committee Grading System for the Prognostic Outcome of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).