Next Article in Journal
DNA Methyltransferases in Cancer: Biology, Paradox, Aberrations, and Targeted Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Relation of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Overexpression to the Resistance to Apoptosis of Tumor B Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Flow-Induced Shear Stress in Nanomaterial Uptake by Cells: Focus on Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Cancer Nanomedicine

School of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
Cancers 2020, 12(8), 2127; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082127
Submission received: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 29 July 2020 / Published: 31 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Nanomedicine)
This Special Issue on Cancer Nanomedicine within Cancers brings together 46 cutting-edge papers covering research within the field along with insightful reviews and opinions reflecting our community. Cancer nanomedicine is a large umbrella under which researchers explore the physical, chemical and biological sciences. I think this is well reflected in this edition. Cancer treatments are often hindered by the lack of drug specificity, poor physicochemical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients, poor penetration ability and drug resistance. With the discovery and characterization of an increasing number of cancer types with little improvement of the ability to diagnose, treatment options or patient prognosis, more advanced technologies are urgently required. Nanotechnology defines particulates within the 1 × 10−9 m range. Particulates within the nano-sized domain often exhibit unique properties compared to their larger size scale. These can be exploited in biomedicine for applications such as imaging, cell sorting, drug delivery and targeting. Cancer nanomedicine is rapidly becoming one of the leading areas of promise for cancer therapy, with first-generation treatments already available to patients.
Within this Special Issue, a diverse range of cancer nanomedicines have been discussed, including the more traditional organic-based systems, such as lipid [1,2,3,4,5,6], polymer [7,8,9,10,11] and cyclodextrin-based [12] particulates. Additionally, there are multiple studies from the growing area of inorganic systems, such as carbon nanomaterials (such as graphene oxide [13,14] and carbon nanotubes [15]) as well as other more established metallic nanomaterials, such as gold [16,17], iron oxide [18,19] and silica-based [20,21] systems. Interest into such inorganic systems has boomed over the last ten years, largely down to their multifunctional capabilities, in imaging [15], photothermal ability [22,23] or use in radiation enhancement [24]. Within this arena, a new class of nanoplatform has also developed, which is gaining traction. These platforms can be used for combined diagnostics and therapy, known as theranostics. The theranostic community is growing rapidly and in this issue a review of theranostics under development [25] as well a scientific paper [20] have been included.
One of the major challenges in cancer nanomedicine is tumour targeting and penetration. Conjugation of surface targetingligands, peptides and other molecules are of major focus within this field [26], including the use of TAT peptides [27], vitamins such as riboflavin [28], integrins [29] and antibodies [30]. Other issues such as tumour microenvironment also contribute to such challenges, and discussion on nanomedicine uptake looking at mechanistic evaluations such as shear stress [31], a hypoxic environment [32] and in overexpressing cell lines [33] have also been included.
Rapid clearance via the immune system has been another barrier historically faced by nanotechnologies. As such, nanomedicines have been developed that are inspired by or mimetic of biological systems such as extracellular vesicles [34] and exosomes [35] that exploit the naturally occurring nano vehicles produced inside the body to extract and repurpose as drug delivery systems. Other clever systems utilise other biomolecules in order to protect their nanoparticle payload, such as cloaking with cell membranes [36]. Other systems seek to deliver biomolecules such as siRNA [37,38] or to elicit an immune response in order to combat cancer [37,38,39,40,41].
Combination therapy has shown major improvement in chemotherapy compared with monotherapy. With improved tumour retardation, reduced drug resistance and better patient prognosis. As such, nanomedicines are under development incorporating combination therapies [30,42] in the hope to further enhance the findings found in small molecule trials, with the protective capabilities of nanomedicines through targeting techniques in order to reduce the toxic side effects of the potent compounds attributed to systemic circulation.
As the benefits of nanomedicine for cancer therapy have been realised, the incorporation of such nanotechnologies has been incorporated into larger-scale macromolecular systems. One such example is in the use of microbubbles [43]. Here, the nanotechnologies are conjugated onto the microbubble surfaces and ultrasonic energy is used as a means to cavitate the tumour tissue, allowing for deeper penetration of the nanomedicines in order for them to deliver their payload at the site of need.
As many of the cancer nanomedicines under development translate further towards the clinic, investigation on reliable scale-up and manufacture is explored. One technique that is currently dominating this field, particularly in liposomal development, is microfluidics. In this issue, we highlight its use in the manufacture of folate conjugated albumin particles incorporating Cabazitaxel [44]. The highly engineered mixing techniques and continuous flow parameters make such technology ideal for the formulation of cancer nanomedicines in the large batches required for trials and beyond. Work is ongoing globally into the evaluation of whether microfluidics can be exploited for other nanomedicine development and formulation.
The exciting advances within this field have led to cancer nanomedicines already being used clinically today. Sceptics would argue that the translation of nanotechnologies into the clinic have not matched the initial hype, with opinion included on the current state of the cancer nanomedicine field [45]. I believe, moving forward, more and more commercial success will be achieved. It is estimated that the global nanomedicine market will be worth USD 334 billion by 2025, with cancer nanomedicine dominating in this field. As the science develops and leads us down new avenues, the findings and their meaning are closely scrutinised and debated within the community. This issue includes 32 scientific manuscripts, 13 review articles and 1 case report reflecting the hot topics within this area [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Michy, T.; Massias, T.; Bernard, C.; Vanwonterghem, L.; Henry, M.; Guidetti, M.; Royal, G.; Coll, J.; Texier, I.; Josserand, V.; et al. Verteporfin-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles Improve Ovarian Cancer Photodynamic Therapy In Vitro and In Vivo. Cancers 2019, 11, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, J.; Yoon, D.; Kim, J. Oxidation-Triggerable Liposome Incorporating Poly (Hydroxyethyl Acrylate-co-Allyl methyl sulfide) as an Anticancer Carrier of Doxorubicin. Cancers 2020, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bang, K.; Na, Y.; Huh, H.; Hwang, S.; Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Lee, H.; Cho, C. The Delivery Strategy of Paclitaxel Nanostructured Lipid Carrier Coated with Platelet Membrane. Cancers 2019, 11, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Palazzolo, S.; Hadla, M.; Russo Spena, C.; Caligiuri, I.; Rotondo, R.; Adeel, M.; Kumar, V.; Corona, G.; Canzonieri, V.; Toffoli, G.; et al. An Effective Multi-Stage Liposomal DNA Origami Nanosystem for In Vivo Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Yakavets, I.; Millard, M.; Lamy, L.; Francois, A.; Scheglmann, D.; Wiehe, A.; Lassalle, H.; Zorin, V.; Bezdetnaya, L. Matryoshka-Type Liposomes Offer the Improved Delivery of Temoporfin to Tumor Spheroids. Cancers 2019, 11, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Filipczak, N.; Jaromin, A.; Piwoni, A.; Mahmud, M.; Sarisozen, C.; Torchilin, V.; Gubernator, J. A Triple Co-Delivery Liposomal Carrier That Enhances Apoptosis via an Intrinsic Pathway in Melanoma Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahmoud, B.; AlAmri, A.; McConville, C. Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas. Cancers 2020, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nieto, C.; Vega, M.; Enrique, J.; Marcelo, G.; Martín del Valle, E. Size Matters in the Cytotoxicity of Polydopamine Nanoparticles in Different Types of Tumors. Cancers 2019, 11, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sambi, M.; DeCarlo, A.; Malardier-Jugroot, C.; Szewczuk, M. Next-Generation Multimodality of Nanomedicine Therapy: Size and Structure Dependence of Folic Acid Conjugated Copolymers Actively Target Cancer Cells in Disabling Cell Division and Inducing Apoptosis. Cancers 2019, 11, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Razura-Carmona, F.; Pérez-Larios, A.; González-Silva, N.; Herrera-Martínez, M.; Medina-Torres, L.; Sáyago-Ayerdi, S.; Sánchez-Burgos, J. Mangiferin-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles: Optical Characterization, Effect of Anti-topoisomerase I. and Cytotoxicity. Cancers 2019, 11, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shih, F.; Jiang, W.; Lin, X.; Kuo, S.; Huang, G.; Hou, Y.; Chang, C.; Liu, Y.; Chiang, Y. A Novel pH-Tunable Secondary Conformation Containing Mixed Micellar System in Anticancer Treatment. Cancers 2020, 12, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Argenziano, M.; Gigliotti, C.; Clemente, N.; Boggio, E.; Ferrara, B.; Trotta, F.; Pizzimenti, S.; Barrera, G.; Boldorini, R.; Bessone, F.; et al. Improvement in the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Doxorubicin Nanosponges in In Vitro and in Mice Bearing Breast Tumor Models. Cancers 2020, 12, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tabish, T.; Pranjol, M.; Horsell, D.; Rahat, A.; Whatmore, J.; Winyard, P.; Zhang, S. Graphene Oxide-Based Targeting of Extracellular Cathepsin D and Cathepsin L As A Novel Anti-Metastatic Enzyme Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bugárová, N.; Špitálsky, Z.; Mičušík, M.; Bodík, M.; Šiffalovič, P.; Koneracká, M.; Závišová, V.; Kubovčíková, M.; Kajanová, I.; Zaťovičová, M.; et al. A Multifunctional Graphene Oxide Platform for Targeting Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hasan, M.; Campbell, E.; Sizova, O.; Lyle, V.; Akkaraju, G.; Kirkpatrick, D.; Naumov, A. Multi-Drug/Gene NASH Therapy Delivery and Selective Hyperspectral NIR Imaging Using Chirality-Sorted Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Cancers 2019, 11, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Naletova, I.; Cucci, L.; D’Angeli, F.; Anfuso, C.; Magrì, A.; La Mendola, D.; Lupo, G.; Satriano, C. A Tunable Nanoplatform of Nanogold Functionalised with Angiogenin Peptides for Anti-Angiogenic Therapy of Brain Tumours. Cancers 2019, 11, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Latorre, A.; Latorre, A.; Castellanos, M.; Rodriguez Diaz, C.; Lazaro-Carrillo, A.; Aguado, T.; Lecea, M.; Romero-Pérez, S.; Calero, M.; Sanchez-Puelles, J.; et al. Multifunctional Albumin-Stabilized Gold Nanoclusters for the Reduction of Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nana, A.; Marimuthu, T.; Kondiah, P.; Choonara, Y.; Du Toit, L.; Pillay, V. Multifunctional Magnetic Nanowires: Design, Fabrication, and Future Prospects as Cancer Therapeutics. Cancers 2019, 11, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Winter, A.; Engels, S.; Goos, P.; Süykers, M.; Gudenkauf, S.; Henke, R.; Wawroschek, F. Accuracy of Magnetometer-Guided Sentinel Lymphadenectomy after Intraprostatic Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Prostate Cancer: The SentiMag Pro II Study. Cancers 2020, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ovejero Paredes, K.; Díaz-García, D.; García-Almodóvar, V.; Lozano Chamizo, L.; Marciello, M.; Díaz-Sánchez, M.; Prashar, S.; Gómez-Ruiz, S.; Filice, M. Multifunctional Silica-Based Nanoparticles with Controlled Release of Organotin Metallodrug for Targeted Theranosis of Breast Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wu, Z.; Lee, C.; Lin, H. Hyaluronidase-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Dual-Imaging and Dual-Target Function. Cancers 2019, 11, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ali, M.; Farghali, H.; Wu, Y.; El-Sayed, I.; Osman, A.; Selim, S.; El-Sayed, M. Gold Nanorod-Assisted Photothermal Therapy Decreases Bleeding during Breast Cancer Surgery in Dogs and Cats. Cancers 2019, 11, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Kralj, S.; Griseti, E.; Nemec, S.; Wilhelm, C.; Plan Sangnier, A.; Bellard, E.; Fourquaux, I.; Golzio, M.; Rols, M. Magnetic Silica-Coated Iron Oxide Nanochains as Photothermal Agents, Disrupting the Extracellular Matrix and Eradicating Cancer Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Loiseau, A.; Boudon, J.; Oudot, A.; Moreau, M.; Boidot, R.; Chassagnon, R.; Mohamed Saïd, N.; Roux, S.; Mirjolet, C.; Millot, N. Titanate Nanotubes Engineered with Gold Nanoparticles and Docetaxel to Enhance Radiotherapy on Xenografted Prostate Tumors. Cancers 2019, 11, 1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mukherjee, A.; Paul, M.; Mukherjee, S. Recent Progress in the Theranostics Application of Nanomedicine in Lung Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yoo, J.; Park, C.; Yi, G.; Lee, D.; Koo, H. Active Targeting Strategies Using Biological Ligands for Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems. Cancers 2019, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Moku, G.; Layek, B.; Trautman, L.; Putnam, S.; Panyam, J.; Prabha, S. Improving Payload Capacity and Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using TAT Peptide Functionalized Polymeric Nanoparticles. Cancers 2019, 11, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Darguzyte, M.; Drude, N.; Lammers, T.; Kiessling, F. Riboflavin-Targeted Drug Delivery. Cancers 2020, 12, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wu, P.; Opadele, A.; Onodera, Y.; Nam, J. Targeting Integrins in Cancer Nanomedicine: Applications in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Houdaihed, L.; Evans, J.; Allen, C. In Vivo Evaluation of Dual-Targeted Nanoparticles Encapsulating Paclitaxel and Everolimus. Cancers 2019, 11, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shurbaji, S.G.; Anlar, G.A.; Hussein, E.; Elzatahry, A.C.; Yalcin, H. Effect of Flow-Induced Shear Stress in Nanomaterial Uptake by Cells: Focus on Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Feng, J.; Byrne, N.; Al Jamal, W.; Coulter, J. Exploitng Current Understanding of Hypoxia Mediated Tumour Progression for Nanotherapeutic Development. Cancers 2019, 11, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Santos-Rebelo, A.; Kumar, P.; Pillay, V.; Choonara, Y.; Eleutério, C.; Figueira, M.; Viana, A.; Ascensão, L.; Molpeceres, J.; Rijo, P.; et al. Development and Mechanistic Insight into the Enhanced Cytotoxic Potential of Parvifloron D Albumin Nanoparticles in EGFR-Overexpressing Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Susa, F.; Limongi, T.; Dumontel, B.; Vighetto, V.; Cauda, V. Engineered Extracellular Vesicles as a Reliable Tool in Cancer Nanomedicine. Cancers 2019, 11, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, G.; Hu, W.; Chen, H.; Shou, X.; Ye, T.; Xu, Y. Cocktail Strategy Based on NK Cell-Derived Exosomes and Their Biomimetic Nanoparticles for Dual Tumor Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Harris, J.; Scully, M.; Day, E. Cancer Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles for Cancer Management. Cancers 2019, 11, 1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ben-David-Naim, M.; Dagan, A.; Grad, E.; Aizik, G.; Nordling-David, M.; Morss Clyne, A.; Granot, Z.; Golomb, G. Targeted siRNA Nanoparticles for Mammary Carcinoma Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kamaruzman, N.; Aziz, N.; Poh, C.; Chowdhury, E. Oncogenic Signaling in Tumorigenesis and Applications of siRNA Nanotherapeutics in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sau, S.; Petrovici, A.; Alsaab, H.; Bhise, K.; Iyer, A. PDL-1 Antibody Drug Conjugate for Selective Chemo-Guided Immune Modulation of Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kerstetter-Fogle, A.; Shukla, S.; Wang, C.; Beiss, V.; Harris, P.; Sloan, A.; Steinmetz, N. Plant Virus-Like Particle In Situ Vaccine for Intracranial Glioma Immunotherapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Di Mascolo, D.; Varesano, S.; Benelli, R.; Mollica, H.; Salis, A.; Zocchi, M.; Decuzzi, P.; Poggi, A. Nanoformulated Zoledronic Acid Boosts the Vδ2 T Cell Immunotherapeutic Potential in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cortese, B.; D’Amone, S.; Testini, M.; Ratano, P.; Palamà, I. Hybrid Clustered Nanoparticles for Chemo-Antibacterial Combinatorial Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2019, 11, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, J.; Moon, H.; Han, H.; Lee, I.; Kim, D.; Lee, H.; Ha, S.; Kim, H.; Chung, J. Antitumor Effects of Intra-Arterial Delivery of Albumin-Doxorubicin Nanoparticle Conjugated Microbubbles Combined with Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Activation on VX2 Rabbit Liver Tumors. Cancers 2019, 11, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Meng, F.; Sun, Y.; Lee, R.; Wang, G.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, H.; Fu, Y.; Yan, G.; Wang, Y.; Deng, W.; et al. Folate Receptor-Targeted Albumin Nanoparticles Based on Microfluidic Technology to Deliver Cabazitaxel. Cancers 2019, 11, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Salvioni, L.; Rizzuto, M.; Bertolini, J.; Pandolfi, L.; Colombo, M.; Prosperi, D. Thirty Years of Cancer Nanomedicine: Success, Frustration, and Hope. Cancers 2019, 11, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pantshwa, J.; Kondiah, P.; Choonara, Y.; Marimuthu, T.; Pillay, V. Nanodrug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoskins, C. Cancer Nanomedicine. Cancers 2020, 12, 2127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082127

AMA Style

Hoskins C. Cancer Nanomedicine. Cancers. 2020; 12(8):2127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoskins, Clare. 2020. "Cancer Nanomedicine" Cancers 12, no. 8: 2127. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop