Next Article in Journal
Implementation of Wavelet-Transform-Based Algorithms in an FPGA for Heart Rate and RT Interval Automatic Measurements in Real Time: Application in a Long-Term Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitor
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Substrate Negative Bias on the Microstructural, Optical, Mechanical, and Laser Damage Resistance Properties of HfO2 Thin Films Grown by DC Reactive Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon-Based Enzyme Mimetics for Electrochemical Biosensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photodetection Properties of CdS/Si Heterojunction Prepared by Pulsed Laser Ablation in DMSO Solution for Optoelectronic Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrodeposition and Properties of Composite Ni Coatings Modified with Multilayer Graphene Oxide

Engels Technological Institute, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, Polytechnichskaya St., 77, 410054 Saratov, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(9), 1747; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091747
Submission received: 12 August 2023 / Revised: 2 September 2023 / Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published: 7 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Thin-Films: Design, Fabrication and Applications)

Abstract

:
Within the framework of this study, Ni-based composite electrochemical coatings (CECs) modified with multilayer graphene oxide (GO) processed using microwave radiation have been deposited. The process of these coatings’ electrodeposition in the potentiodynamic mode has been studied. The structure of Ni–GO and Ni–GO (MW) CECs has been studied using X-ray phase analysis (XPA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).It has been shown that the addition of GO into a nickel deposit contributes to the formation of uniform fine-grained coatings. As a result, the microhardness of the Ni–GO (MW) CECs increases by 1.40 times compared to Ni without GO. The corrosion–electrochemical behavior of nickel CECs in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution was researched. It was established that the corrosion rate of the nickel–GO (MW) CEC in 3.5% NaCl decreases by about 1.70 times in contrast to unmodified nickel coatings. This effect is due to the absence of agglomeration of the graphene oxide in the volume of the nickel matrix and the impermeability of GO particles to the corrosive environment.

1. Introduction

Electrodeposition of nickel coatings is one of the most common methods of protection against corrosion and wear of steel products. Nickel and its alloys are superior to many other metal materials in operational properties, such as resistance to corrosion, wear resistance, and hardness, which results in a wide range of applications (chemical industry, aircraft construction, nuclear plants, medical equipment, etc.) [1,2]. By co-depositing nickel with dispersed particles of various natures, it is possible to achieve a significant improvement in its properties. Metal coatings electrodeposited together with the dispersed phase, which a recalled “composite electrochemical coatings” (CEC), are characterized by excellent physical, mechanical, and corrosion properties.
Thus, nickel-based CECs are known for their excellent adhesion, resistance to corrosion, high strength, and abrasion properties [2]. Among the whole variety of dispersed materials that can be used for obtaining nickel CECs, carbon compounds are of great interest due to their unique properties. Nickel coatings can be modified with carbon nanotubes [3,4,5], graphite [6], nanodiamonds [7,8], fullerene [9,10,11,12], etc.
Graphene and its derivatives occupy a special place among carbon compounds. Graphene is a two-dimensional carbon material having a single atomic structure. Due to the high specific surface area, graphene imparts excellent mechanical properties to the metal matrix compared to all other dispersed materials [13,14,15]. However, graphene-modified coatings are sensitive to surface defects, especially in corrosive environments [16]. The elimination of these and other drawbacks became possible owing to the emergence of graphene oxide (GO), which is an oxidized form of graphene. In graphene oxide, carbon atoms are bonded to oxide functional groups (carbonyl, carboxyl, epoxy, hydroxide, etc.). Because of this, graphene oxide becomes hydrophilic, forms stable dispersions in aqueous and non-aqueous environments, demonstrates high chemical activity, and has electrical resistance [17,18,19]. Graphene and graphene oxide are widely used [20,21,22]. It is known that GO is inert in aggressive environments, which determines the suitability of its use for anticorrosion protection [23]. Thus, nickel-based coatings containing a dispersed phase of graphene oxide can be used to modify parts of micromachines.
It can be assumed that microwave radiation (MW) can change the structure of graphene oxide and improve its properties [19,24]. Therefore, the study of the operational characteristics of the electrochemical coatings modified with GO processed using MW is relevant.
The purpose of this study is to obtain nickel-based composite coatings modified with multilayer graphene oxide processed using microwave radiation in the stationary mode of electrolysis to investigate their structure, physical–mechanical, and corrosion properties.

2. Materials and Methods

Composite Ni–GO and Ni–GO (MW) coatings were deposited on a steel electrode (steel 45) from a sulfate–chloride electrolyte bath (Table 1).
Electrochemical deposits of pure nickel were obtained from the above-mentioned bath without a GO dispersed phase (DF).
Multilayer graphene oxide was obtained by galvanostatic oxidation of natural graphite powder GB/T 3518-95 (China) [25] with a current of 200 mA·g−1 with 0.7A·h·g−1 power supplied to the system in a three-electrode cell with platinum electrodes using a potentiostat P-150x (Elins, Russia).The electrolyte used was 83% H2SO4, obtained by successive dilution of concentrated sulfuric acid of high purity grade (Russian Standard 14262-78 [26]) with bidistilled water [27].
Microwave processing of graphene oxide was carried out using a ZhUK-2-02 microwave emitter with an operating radiation frequency of 2.45 GHz and a radiated power of 1.3 kW for 15 s.
The phase composition was studied by an ARL X’TRA device (Thermo Scientific, Ecublens, Switzerland) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15412 nm). The morphology of the dispersed phase and the surface of Ni coatings were studied using an ASPEX Explorer scanning electron microscope (ASPEX, Framingham, MA, USA).
Electrochemical measurements were conducted on a potentiostat P-30J (Elins, Russia). The potentials were set relative to a saturated silver chloride reference electrode and recalculated on the hydrogen electrode.
The Vickers microhardness (HV) of the deposits was measured using a PMT-3 device (AO LOMO, Saint-Petersburg, Russia). A tetrahedral diamond pyramid was pressed into the electrolytic deposits using static indentation under a load of 100 g. The calculation of HV was carried out according to the data of 7 parallel experiments. The error of measurements was 3%.
To evaluate the corrosion–electrochemical behavior of studied coatings, anodic chronovoltammetry curves were obtained in the 0.5 M H2SO4 (potential sweep rate Vp = 8 mV/s). Corrosion rate studies were carried out in the 3.5% NaCl.

3. Results and Discussion

The properties of composite coatings are largely determined by the properties and structure of DF. Morphological analysis of graphene oxide shows that this compound has a layered ordered structure, the thickness of individual layers being less than 0.1 μm (Figure 1a). Under the influence of microwave waves, the GO layers open, which leads to the formation of a cellular structure with a large number of V-shaped pores with a size of 1–10 μm and the thickness of polygraphene planes up to 0.01 μm and an increase in the specific surface area of graphene oxide up to 400–500 m2g−1 (Figure 1b).
Graphene oxide affects the deposition kinetics of nickel coatings. During the electrodeposition of nickel in the presence of unprocessed GO, the potentials shift to the region of positive values compared to pure nickel (Figure 2); the rate of the process is higher for nickel–GO CEC (Figure 2, curve 2). When the dispersed phase is processed with microwave radiation, the potential shift is smaller than that of the coating modified with untreated DF, but the process rate is much higher (Figure 2, curve 3).
X-ray phase analysis of the obtained coatings shows a change in the crystal structure of nickel under the influence of carbon material. Peaks in the diffraction pattern at 44.5° and 52.2° are responsible for the (111) and (200) nickel crystal planes, respectively [8]. As can be seen from the diffraction pattern (Figure 3), the predominant crystalline orientation for nickel is the direction (200); however, in the presence of graphene oxide, the intensity of the peak at 44.5° increases, which indicates the growth of the nickel crystal also towards the (111) plane. It is obvious that the dispersed phase affects the crystal structure of the nickel matrix. Graphene oxide has a layered structure (Figure 1), and its layers can serve as vacant sites for the growth of metal deposit nuclei, thereby limiting grain growth and making them more compact, which will be further confirmed by SEM images of the studied coatings.
The crystalline size of the obtained coatings at the intensity of the (111) crystalline plane was calculated from the FWHM and diffraction angle based on Scherrer’s Equation [28]:
D = K λ F W H M c o s θ 180 ° π
where D is the average crystallite size, K is the Scherrer constant with the value of 0.89 in this experiment, FWHM is the full-width half maximum at the peak of 2θ, and λ is the wavelength of Cu-Kα radiation.
The grain size of the studied coatings decreased from 23 nm for the pure nickel to 16 nm for Ni–GO and Ni–GO (MW) CECs. Two types of CEC have the same grain size at the intensity of (111), and it proves our point that there are no changes in the intensity of the (111) plane of nickel modified with microwave-processed graphene oxide compared to the diffraction pattern of the CEC with untreated graphene oxide.
There are no changes in the intensity of the (111) plane of nickel modified with microwave-processed graphene oxide compared to the diffraction pattern of the CEC with untreated graphene oxide. It should be noted that the diffraction peak characteristic of graphene oxide is not observed in the diffraction pattern due to the limited ability of the diffractometer to detect this compound at low concentrations.
The study of the surface morphology of the obtained coatings shows that the DF affects the structure of the deposits. A pure nickel coating (Figure 4a) is characterized by an X-ray-amorphous, disordered, coarse-grained structure; however, in the presence of GO, the nickel deposit becomes ordered, uniform, and fine-grained (Figure 4b). During the deposition of nickel with graphene oxide processed with microwave radiation, even greater refinement of the grain of the electrolytic deposit occurs (Figure 4c).
Changes in the surface morphology of the coatings and a decrease in the grain size of the deposit directly affect their physical and mechanical properties [7]. Graphene oxide layers in the coating serve as vacant sites for nucleation and prevent an excessive increase in the size of metal grains, which leads to an increase in the nucleation rate. As a result, the number of grains in the deposit increases significantly, as well as the length of the boundaries of these grains, which prevent the movement of dislocations and plastic deformation of the crystal lattice [8]. Moreover, graphene oxide has excellent mechanical properties and a large specific surface area. When composite coatings are subjected to an external load, GO layers can take on some of this load due to the displacement of the shear stress. The motion of dislocations in the matrix is limited by GO layers, which leads to an increase in the energy of lattice distortion and resistance to deformation [22]. These factors ultimately determine an increase in the microhardness of Ni–GO CEC by about 1.20 times compared to Ni without a DF (Table 2). The hardening is caused by a synergistic effect between the formed microstructure of the galvanic coating and the influence of co-deposited graphene oxide. The DF particles themselves also have a strengthening effect on the studied Ni deposits [7,8].
When nickel is modified with graphene oxide processed using microwave radiation, the microhardness of the coatings increases by about 1.40 times compared to pure nickel (Table 2). This may be due to the expansion of the layers of the dispersed phase under the influence of microwave radiation (Figure 2). Expanded GO layers have a large specific surface area, which contributes to an increase in the rate of nucleation during electrodeposition and deceleration of the motion of dislocations in the nickel matrix. Probably, the hardening in this case is described by the Orowan mechanism, according to which dislocations are held on the DF particles during movement until the applied stress becomes sufficient for the dislocation line to bend and pass between them [29,30].
Another important property of composite coatings is resistance to corrosion. The study of the corrosion–electrochemical behavior of Ni deposits by the chronovotammetry method in 0.5 M H2SO4 shows that the particles of the DF increase the potential and also reduce the current of the active anodic dissolution of these coatings (Figure 5).
A characteristic feature of the anodic potentiodynamic curves of the Ni–GO CEC is a pronounced passive region, which broadens especially noticeably for the nickel coating modified with GO processed with microwave radiation, while it is significantly smoothed for a pure nickel deposit. Based on the conducted potentiodynamic studies in 0.5 M H2SO4, it can be assumed that the corrosion resistance of Ni–GO and Ni–GO (MW) CECs will be higher than that of unmodified nickel.
The resistance to corrosion of Ni coatings was estimated from the corrosion rate of the deposits determined by the weight loss of the coatings after they had been kept in 3.5% NaCl for 24 h (the electrodes were weighed before and after they were immersed in a saline solution) using the formula [31,32]:
C o r r o s i o n r a t e   =   K W A T D
where K is constant (8.76∙104), W is loss of mass in g, A is the working surface area of the electrode (1 cm2), T is time of immersion in hours, and D is density of nickel (8.90 g/cm3).
The corrosion rate of the nickel–GO (MW) CEC in 3.5% NaCl decreases by about 1.70 times in contrast to unmodified nickel coatings (Table 3). When analyzing the GO effect on the corrosion rate of the studied coatings, one should take into account the fact that it is due to several reasons. Undoubtedly, the main factor determining the corrosion behavior is the composition and structure of nickel deposits [29]. One of the features of corrosion is its spontaneity, which is indicated by the negative value of the Gibbs free energy of this process. The tendency of Ni to electrochemical corrosion depends on the crystallographic orientation, which determines the surface free energy per unit area of the electrode surface. The ordered fine-grained structure of the studied CECs (Figure 4b,c), in contrast to pure nickel (Figure 4a), contributes to a uniform distribution of the corrosion current over the surface. It should also be noted that the agglomeration of the dispersed phase in the metal matrix does not contribute to an increase in the corrosion resistance of electrolytic deposits and even leads to the deterioration of corrosion properties [33]. Consequently, graphene oxide particles are uniformly distributed in the volume and on the surface of the composite coatings [31,32]. Moreover, the stability and impermeability of the exhaust gas contribute to the lengthening of the diffusion path of the aggressive environment. High impermeability does not allow Ni2+ ions to penetrate through the cross-section of the graphene oxide particles [34,35]. Moreover, the effect of the dispersed phase in composite coatings is noted only if the particles form compounds that are more resistant to corrosion than the metal matrix at the phase boundaries or throughout the volume. Obviously, similar compounds are also formed in the structure of the studied Ni CECs. All the above-mentioned factors jointly provide an increase in the resistance to corrosion of nickel–GO and nickel–GO (MW) CECs in comparison to Ni coatings without DF.

4. Conclusions

Based on the conducted research, it can be concluded that in the galvanostatic mode of electrolysis, composite coatings are formed from a sulfate–chloride Ni plating electrolytic bath containing a DF of multilayer graphene oxide. The addition of GO particles into the matrix of Ni coatings leads to a change in their surface microstructure. GO has a decisive effect on the physicomechanical and corrosion properties of the investigated CECs, thus contributing to their improvement. Modification of electrochemical nickel with a dispersed phase of GO processed using microwave radiation enhances the positive effect and leads to increased microhardness of the studied coatings by approximately 1.4 times, as well as a decrease in their corrosion rate by 1.7 times.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.; Data curation, D.T. and A.D.; Formal analysis, A.Y. and A.T.; Investigation, V.T., D.T. and A.D.; Methodology, V.T., A.D., D.T., A.S. and A.Y.; Project administration, V.T.; Supervision, V.T.; Visualization, A.D., A.Y., D.T., A.T., A.S. and M.L.; Writing—original draft, V.T.; Writing—review and editing, V.T., A.D., D.T., A.Y., A.S., A.T. and M.L. All authors participated in the discussion of the results and the writing of the text of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of financial and non-financial interest requiring disclosure in this article.

References

  1. Orinakova, R.; Turonova, A.; Kladekova, D.; Galova, M.; Smith, R.M. Recent developments in the electrodeposition of nickel and some nickel-based alloys. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2006, 36, 957–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. DordsheikhTorkamani, A.; Velashjerdi, M.; Abbas, A.; Bolourchi, M.; Maji, P. Electrodeposition of Nickel matrix composite coatings via various Boride particles: A review. J. Compos. Compd. 2021, 3, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tseluikin, V.N.; Koreshkova, A.A. Pulsed electrodeposition of composite coatings based on zinc–nickel alloy. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 2018, 54, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, P.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J.; Lei, Y.; Shu, B. Investigation of the microstructure and tribological properties of CNTs/Ni composites prepared by electrodeposition. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 036404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jyotheender, K.S.; Gupta, A.; Srivastava, C. Grain boundary engineering in Ni-carbon nanotube composite coatings and its effect on the corrosion behaviour of the coatings. Materialia 2020, 9, 100617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rai, P.K.; Gupta, A. Investigation of surface characteristics and effect of electrodeposition parameters on nickel-based composite coating. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chayeuski, V.V.; Zhylinski, V.V.; Rudak, P.V.; Rusalsky, D.P.; Visniakov, N.; Cernasejus, O. Characteristics of ZrC/Ni-UDD coatings for a tungsten carbide cutting tool. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 446, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Makarova, I.; Dobryden, I.; Kharitonov, D.; Kasach, A.; Ryl, J.; Repo, E.; Vuorinen, E. Nickel-nanodiamond coatings electrodeposited from tartrate electrolyte at ambient temperature. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 380, 125063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tseluikin, V.N.; Tolstova, I.V.; Gun’kin, I.F.; Pankst’yanov, A.Y. Preparation of aqueous colloidal dispersion of C60 fullerene. Colloid J. 2005, 67, 522–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tseluikin, V.N.; Chubenko, I.S.; Gun’kin, I.F.; Pankst’yanov, A.Y. Colloidal dispersion of fullerene C60 free of organic solvents. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2006, 79, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tseluikin, V.N. Electrodeposition and properties of composite coatings modified by fullerene C60. Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 2017, 53, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Antihovich, I.V.; Ablazhey, N.M.; Chernik, A.A.; Zharsky, I.M. Electrodeposition of nickel and composite nickel-fullerenol coatings from low-temperature sulphate-chloride-isobutyrate electrolyte. Procedia Chem. 2014, 10, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Algul, H.; Tokur, M.; Ozcan, S.; Uysal, M.; Cetinkaya, T.; Akbulut, H.; Alp, A. The effect of graphene content and sliding speed on the wearmechanism of nickel–graphene nanocomposites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 359, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q.; Xing, M. A comparison study on mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene sheet. Comp. Part B Eng. 2018, 133, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yasin, G.; Arif, M.; Nizam, N.M.; Shakeel, M.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, W.Q.; Hassan, T.M.; Abbas, Z.; Farahbakhsh, I.; Zuo, Y. Effect of surfactant concentration in electrolyte on the fabrication and properties of nickel-graphene nanocomposite coating synthesized by electrochemical co-deposition. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 20039–20047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. The structural stability of graphene anticorrosion coating materials is compromised at low potentials. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 7896–7901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Angizi, S.; Huang, X.; Hong, L.; Akbar, M.A.; Selvaganapathy, P.R.; Kruse, P. Defect density-dependent pH response of graphene derivatives: Towards the development of pH-sensitive graphene oxide devices. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sreekumar, R.; Nair, A.S.; Sreejakumari, S.S. Recent trends and developments in two-dimensional materials based electrodeposited nickel nanocomposite coatings. FlatChem 2022, 36, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, M.; Paek, S.-M. Microwave-assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide with hollow nanostructure for application to lithium-ion batteries. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, Z.; Wu, P.; Wang, H.; Jiang, S.; Huang, M.; Lei, D.; Wu, F. Multimode tunable terahertz absorber based on a quarter graphene disk structure. Results Phys. 2023, 48, 106420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Z.; Cai, P.; Wen, Q.; Chen, H.; Tang, Y.; Yi, Z.; Wei, K.; Li, G.; Tang, B.; Yi, Y. Graphene multi-frequency broadband and ultra-broadband terahertz absorber based on surface plasmon resonance. Electronics 2023, 12, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lai, R.; Shi, P.; Yi, Z.; Li, H.; Yi, Y. Triple-band surface plasmon resonance metamaterial absorber based on open-ended prohibited sign type monolayer graphene. Micromachines 2023, 14, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gupta, A.; Srivastava, C. Enhanced corrosion resistance by SnCu-graphene oxide composite coatings. Thin Solid Films 2019, 669, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fei, H.; Dong, J.; Wan, C.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, X.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zang, K.; Luo, J.; et al. Microwave-Assisted Rapid Synthesis of Graphene-Supported Single Atomic Metals. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. GB/T 3518-95; Flake Graphite. State Bureau of Technical Supervision: Beijing, China, 1995.
  26. GOST 14262-78; Super Pure Sulphuric Acid. Specifications. State Committee of Standards of the Council of Ministers of the USSR: Moscow, USSR, 1978. Available online: https://www.russiangost.com/p-71540-gost-14262-78.aspx (accessed on 11 August 2023).
  27. Yakovlev, A.V.; Yakovleva, E.V.; Vikulova, M.A.; Frolov, I.N.; Rakhmetulina, L.A.; Tseluikin, V.N.; Krasnov, V.V.; Mostovoy, A.S. Synthesis of multilayer graphene oxide in electrochemical graphite dispersion in H2SO4. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2020, 93, 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, H.; Zhang, N.; Fang, F. Fabrication of high-performance nickel/graphene oxide composite coatings using ultrasonic-assisted. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 62, 104858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, J.; Lei, W.; Deng, Y.; Xue, Z.; Qian, H.; Liu, W.; Li, X. Effect of current density on microstructure and corrosion resistance of Ni-graphene oxide composite coating electrodeposited under supercritical carbon dioxide. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 358, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hong, Q.; Wang, D.; Yin, S. The microstructure, wear and electrochemical properties of electrodeposited Ni-diamond composite coatings: Effect of diamond concentration. Mat. Tod. Comm. 2023, 34, 105476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, F.; Kang, H.; Guo, E.; Li, R.; Chen, Z.; Zeng, Y. The role of nickel in mechanical performance and corrosion behaviour of nickel-aluminium bronze in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 2018, 139, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rekha, M.Y.; Srivastava, C. Microstructural evolution and corrosion behavior of Zn-Ni-graphene oxide composite coatings. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 5896–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Tay, S.L.; Wei, S.; Xiong, C.; Gao, W.; Shakoor, R.A.; Kahraman, R. Microstructure and properties of sol-enhanced Ni-Co-TiO2 nano-composite coatings on mild steel. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 649, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jyotheender, K.S.; Srivastava, C. Ni-graphene oxide composite coatings: Optimum graphene oxide for enhanced corrosion resistance. Composites Part B 2019, 175, 107145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lou, G.; Shen, L.; Qian, Y.; Chen, Y.; Bai, H.; Cheng, H.; Xu, J.; Yang, Y. Study on the antibacterial and anti-corrosion properties of Ni-GO/Ni-rGO composite coating on manganese steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 424, 127681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) original graphene oxide; (b) graphene oxide processed by microwave (magnification ×10,000).
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) original graphene oxide; (b) graphene oxide processed by microwave (magnification ×10,000).
Micromachines 14 01747 g001
Figure 2. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of electrodeposition of unmodified Ni (1), Ni–GO (2), and Ni–GO (MW) CECs (3) (potential sweep rate Vp = 8 mV/s).
Figure 2. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of electrodeposition of unmodified Ni (1), Ni–GO (2), and Ni–GO (MW) CECs (3) (potential sweep rate Vp = 8 mV/s).
Micromachines 14 01747 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of unmodified Ni, Ni–GO, and Ni–GO (MW) CECs obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of unmodified Ni, Ni–GO, and Ni–GO (MW) CECs obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2.
Micromachines 14 01747 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of unmodified Ni (a), Ni–GO (b), and Ni–GO (MW) (c) CECs obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2 (magnification ×2500).
Figure 4. SEM images of unmodified Ni (a), Ni–GO (b), and Ni–GO (MW) (c) CECs obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2 (magnification ×2500).
Micromachines 14 01747 g004
Figure 5. Chronovoltammetry curves of unmodified Ni (1), Ni-GO (2), and Ni-GO (MW) (3) CECs in 0.5 M H2SO4 (coatings obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2).
Figure 5. Chronovoltammetry curves of unmodified Ni (1), Ni-GO (2), and Ni-GO (MW) (3) CECs in 0.5 M H2SO4 (coatings obtained at ic = 10 A/dm2).
Micromachines 14 01747 g005
Table 1. Composition of electrolyte and parameters of electrodeposition.
Table 1. Composition of electrolyte and parameters of electrodeposition.
Composition of Electrolyte Concentration, g/LParameters of Deposition
1NiSO4·7H2O220Temperature t = 45 °C
2NiCl2·6H2O40Constant stirring
3CH3COONa30Cathode current density
4Graphene oxide10ic = 7, 8, 9, 10 A/dm2
Table 2. Microhardness HV0.10 values in MPa of Ni-based coatings.
Table 2. Microhardness HV0.10 values in MPa of Ni-based coatings.
Cathode Current
Density ic, A/dm2
NiNi–GONi–GO (MW)
7193822002768
8215025202910
9235029383223
10245930763399
Table 3. Corrosion rate, mm/year of Ni-based coatings.
Table 3. Corrosion rate, mm/year of Ni-based coatings.
Cathode Current
Density ic, A/dm2
NiNi–GONi–GO (MW)
70.6560.4920.410
80.5740.4100.328
90.4510.3280.287
100.3280.2050.164
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tseluikin, V.; Dzhumieva, A.; Yakovlev, A.; Tikhonov, D.; Tribis, A.; Strilets, A.; Lopukhova, M. Electrodeposition and Properties of Composite Ni Coatings Modified with Multilayer Graphene Oxide. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091747

AMA Style

Tseluikin V, Dzhumieva A, Yakovlev A, Tikhonov D, Tribis A, Strilets A, Lopukhova M. Electrodeposition and Properties of Composite Ni Coatings Modified with Multilayer Graphene Oxide. Micromachines. 2023; 14(9):1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tseluikin, Vitaly, Asel Dzhumieva, Andrey Yakovlev, Denis Tikhonov, Alena Tribis, Anastasia Strilets, and Marina Lopukhova. 2023. "Electrodeposition and Properties of Composite Ni Coatings Modified with Multilayer Graphene Oxide" Micromachines 14, no. 9: 1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14091747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop