Next Article in Journal
Construction of MoS2-ReS2 Hybrid on Ti3C2Tx MXene for Enhanced Microwave Absorption
Next Article in Special Issue
Advanced Fabrication of 3D Micro/Nanostructures of Gallium Oxide with a Tuned Band Gap and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Research on an Enhanced Detuned-Loading Effect in Integrated Two-Section DFB Lasers with High Modulation Bandwidths
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of µFFE Devices in COC via Hot Embossing with a 3D-Printed Master Mold
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design of Power Amplifiers for BDS-3 Terminal Based on InGaP/GaAs HBT MMIC and LGA Technology

Micromachines 2023, 14(11), 1995; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14111995
by Zhenbing Li 1, Junjie Huang 1, Jinrong Zhang 1, Shilin Jia 1, Haoyang Sun 1, Gang Li 2 and Guangjun Wen 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2023, 14(11), 1995; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14111995
Submission received: 26 September 2023 / Revised: 17 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 27 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Design and Fabrication of Miniature Devices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This manuscript described a PA design based on InGaP/GaAs heterojunction HBT combined with several technologies. Three simulation platform were built to optimize the PA designs. Based on these tools, high gain, high efficiency, and high linearity PA design was achieved. However, the authors did not make it clear the innovation of this work compared to others. The quality of the figures in the article needs to be improved and English writing also needs improvement. The manuscript should be reconsidered after major revision. In addition, there are some issues the authors should also address.

 

1.   The introduction of the background is too long. The authors should refine it.

2.   In InGaP/GaAs HBT design part, the authors should clarify more on the reason of the choice of InGaP/GaAs HBT technology.

3.   In line 182-183, the authors explained why GaAs is doped with InGaP, corresponding references should be cited here.

4.   Fig. 1 is too simple, and it is better to add the materials information to the device structure.

5.   In line 203, the authors only provide the emitter area information about the HBT device. Other detailed information like device channel length, active material thickness, contact metal, etc., should be also presented.

6.   For equation (13)-(15), not all the parameters were clarified in line 459, including A, T, Thot, etc. The authors should denote them all clearly and the corresponding value used in this paper.

7.   Figure 15 has poor resolution, and the temperature value of the legend cannot be seen clearly. The author should provide a high quality one.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The English writing needs to be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This work presents a power amplifier based on GaP/GaAs technology. The content is interesting and the length is enough for this journal. It is suggested to publish this manuscript after a minor revision.

1.     The full expressions should be added to some abbreviations when they appear for the first time in this article, such as MMIC, LGA, CGR and so on.

2.     In figure 2,lots of data spectra are presented, it is suggested to point out the assignment of each spectrum.

3.     It is difficult to figure out the function of each section of this circuit, please provide some introduction words.

4.     It believed that there may be more compatible devices, please add more to Table 2 to improve the convincing.

5.     Some wide-bandgap semiconductors literature are suggested to be included, such as Nat Rev Mater 8, 587–603 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-023-00583-9, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8 (2021) 031315, Small Methods 2022, 6, 2101348,  Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2023, 38(9): 1055-1061.https://www.jim.org.cn/CN/10.15541/jim20220569

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors has addressed all the issues. I recommend it publication in its present form.

Back to TopTop