Next Article in Journal
A New Nonlinear Spatial Compliance Model Method for Flexure Leaf Springs with Large Width-to-Length Ratio under Large Deformation
Next Article in Special Issue
Laser Additive Manufacturing of Anti-Tetrachiral Endovascular Stents with Negative Poisson’s Ratio and Favorable Cytocompatibility
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Flexible RF MEMS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strain Rate Dependence of Compressive Mechanical Properties of Polyamide and Its Composite Fabricated Using Selective Laser Sintering under Saturated-Water Conditions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Femtosecond Laser Treatment for Improving the Corrosion Resistance of Selective Laser Melted 17-4PH Stainless Steel

Micromachines 2022, 13(7), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13071089
by Lingjian Meng 1, Jiazhao Long 1, Huan Yang 1,*, Wenjing Shen 1, Chunbo Li 1, Can Yang 1, Meng Wang 1 and Jiaming Li 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2022, 13(7), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13071089
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 3 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 9 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript reports the enhancement of corrosion resistance of 17-4PH stainless steel after femtosecond laser treatment. The authors conducted a very comprehensive characterization of the laser treated metal followed by a qualitative discussion of the mechanism. Overall, the manuscript is well-written, and the finding is very informative. The reviewer only has a few minor comments.

1. What is the rationale behind choosing the current laser processing parameters listed in Table 2?

2. It is better to add the value of surface roughness in Fig. 3e to be more informative.

3. It is better to add a table to summarize the sample labels used in the manuscript. (i.e. FLAR, FLAN, SH) so that the reader can easily find the definition if they get lost.

4. Fig. 5a is hard to read due to too much overlapping lines. The reviewer would suggest separating the F-sample and M-sample into two figures with the same scales.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

In this work, the authors have performed femtosecond laser texturing on selective laser melted (SLM) 17-4PH stainless steel (SS) parts to study the corrosion resistance. The work contains some interesting results. They found that laser texturing in an argon atmosphere avoided surface oxidation and benefited the formation of passivation film to improve corrosion resistance. The manuscript is well-written and can be published with minor revisions. The reviewer has the following comments.

1.     Previous research has shown that laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) (similar structure like FLAN) can also be superhydrophobic. The reviewer suggests including the contact angle of all 8 conditions. This will provide complete information on how heat treatment influenced wettability.

https://doi.org/10.1021/la2011088

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.061

 

2.     A recent review article on the role of surface chemistry modification due to heat treatment after laser texturing (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108744) on corrosion resistance. Wettability transition from superhydrophilicity (immediately after laser texturing) to superhydrophobicity upon heat treatment is due to accelerated adsorption of hydrocarbon compounds from the environment. The authors have shown XPS results of Fe 2p, Cr 2p, Ni 2p, and Cu 2p. It might be beneficial to include C 1s to show the readers whether the adsorbed carbon content also plays a role in the improved corrosion resistance in the FLAN-M case.

 

3.     Superhydrophobicity cannot be claimed with only static contact angle. Therefore, additional parameters, including roll-off angle, contact angle hysteresis, advancing and receding contact angle, need to be included in the manuscript. 

 

4.     The introduction section of the manuscript is weak for a review related to recent works on the effect of laser texturing on wettability and corrosion resistance. It should be improved to establish the focus of this work.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.04.005

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.033

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b06217

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11091577

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145136

 

5.     The current manuscript only shows measured EIS results. Please provide simulated EIS curves based on electrochemical equivalent circuits (Figure 7) to verify the circuit's validity.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop