Next Article in Journal
Design and Implementation of a Fully-Actuated Integrated Aerial Platform Based on Geometric Model Predictive Control
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationship between Onset of Sliding Behavior and Size of Droplet on Inclined Solid Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study of Thermal Enhancement in a Single- and Double-Layer Microchannel Heat Sink with Different Ribs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strategy for Fast Decision on Material System Suitability for Continuous Crystallization Inside a Slug Flow Crystallizer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Portable, Negative-Pressure Actuated, Dynamically Tunable Microfluidic Droplet Generator

Micromachines 2022, 13(11), 1823; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111823
by Martin Trossbach 1, Marta de Lucas Sanz 1, Brinton Seashore-Ludlow 2 and Haakan N. Joensson 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2022, 13(11), 1823; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111823
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Droplet-Based Microfluidics: Design, Fabrication and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work developed a low-cost, minimal footprint droplet generation setup using one to three small membrane pumps. The modular setup is capable of producing monodisperse droplets for a wide range of droplet sizes and can be dynamically adjusted to vary droplet composition. It is an interesting work, I suggest a major revision in order to better benefit the general audience of Micromachines.

1. In Figure 4, the diameter of droplet at P = -10.9 kPa is similar to P = -12.5 kPa. When P = -13.8 kPa, why the diameter of droplet deceases?

2. Can the droplet generator produce smaller size droplet (diameter<100 μm)?

3. In Figure 6A, the droplet is not uniform at P = -1.4 kPa.

4. How about the stability of the droplet?

5. In Figure 8, it shows cell spheroid formation. Can it achieve single cell in a droplet?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The research contents was not well organized and the explanation was not clear. Especially simple explanations were repeated in 2. Materials and Methods; The description of the experiment was duplicated.

2. Also, the title and contents of the paper do not match well. The droplet generator system proposed in this paper is said to be portable. However, in this regard, not only the explanation is insufficient, but also the comparative explanation with the existing system is lacking. What is the overall system size? If it is portable, it is very important thing.

3. For the system proposed in this paper, what is improved and what are the advantages compared with the general negative-pressure generator should be explained in detail.

4. There is no description of the chip design used, only the description of the entire setups. If the general design of flow focusing droplet generator is used, the simulation is not new at all because it is not different from the existing one. Please explain about what’s different from other previous researches in Fig. 3?

5. In the case of a flow focusing droplet generator, the droplet size changes depending on the pressure change. It is necessary to explain how the system proposed in this paper maintains the pressure constant and how much the droplet size fluctuates according to the minute pressure change in Fig. 5.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to recommend the acceptance of this manuscript for publishing.

Back to TopTop