Next Article in Journal
Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling a Dielectrophoretic Microfluidic Device with Vertical Interdigitated Transducer Electrodes for Separation of Microparticles Based on Size
Previous Article in Journal
On-Chip Inverted Emulsion Method for Fast Giant Vesicle Production, Handling, and Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nucleotide Identification in DNA Using Dielectrophoresis Spectroscopy
Article

Evaluation of Performance and Tunability of a Co-Flow Inertial Microfluidic Device

by 1, 1,2 and 1,2,*
1
Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
2
University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2020, 11(3), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030287
Received: 28 January 2020 / Revised: 28 February 2020 / Accepted: 5 March 2020 / Published: 10 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Particles Separation in Microfluidic Devices)
Microfluidics has gained a lot of attention for biological sample separation and purification methods over recent years. From many active and passive microfluidic techniques, inertial microfluidics offers a simple and efficient method to demonstrate various biological applications. One prevalent limitation of this method is its lack of tunability for different applications once the microfluidic devices are fabricated. In this work, we develop and characterize a co-flow inertial microfluidic device that is tunable in multiple ways for adaptation to different application requirements. In particular, flow rate, flow rate ratio and output resistance ratio are systematically evaluated for flexibility of the cutoff size of the device and modification of the separation performance post-fabrication. Typically, a mixture of single size particles is used to determine cutoff sizes for the outlets, yet this fails to provide accurate prediction for efficiency and purity for a more complex biological sample. Thus, we use particles with continuous size distribution (2–32 μm) for separation demonstration under conditions of various flow rates, flow rate ratios and resistance ratios. We also use A549 cancer cell line with continuous size distribution (12–27 μm) as an added demonstration. Our results indicate inertial microfluidic devices possess the tunability that offers multiple ways to improve device performance for adaptation to different applications even after the devices are prototyped. View Full-Text
Keywords: microfluidics; particle separation microfluidics; particle separation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogseth, A.; Zhou, J.; Papautsky, I. Evaluation of Performance and Tunability of a Co-Flow Inertial Microfluidic Device. Micromachines 2020, 11, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030287

AMA Style

Bogseth A, Zhou J, Papautsky I. Evaluation of Performance and Tunability of a Co-Flow Inertial Microfluidic Device. Micromachines. 2020; 11(3):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogseth, Amanda, Jian Zhou, and Ian Papautsky. 2020. "Evaluation of Performance and Tunability of a Co-Flow Inertial Microfluidic Device" Micromachines 11, no. 3: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11030287

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop