Next Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue on Neural Electrodes: Design and Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of ALD-ZnO Seed Layers in the Growth of ZnO Nanorods for Hydrogen Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Electrowetting-on-Dielectric Microlens Array Sheet
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Resonant Pressure Sensor Based upon Electrostatically Comb Driven and Piezoresistively Sensed Lateral Resonators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) in MoS2- and WS2-Protected Titanium Side-Polished Optical Fiber as a Humidity Sensor

1
Photonic Research Centre, Faculty Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3
Computational Optics Research Group, Advanced Institute of Materials Science, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
4
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2019, 10(7), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10070465
Submission received: 24 May 2019 / Revised: 14 June 2019 / Accepted: 21 June 2019 / Published: 11 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MEMS/NEMS Sensors: Fabrication and Application, Volume II)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we report the effects of a side-polished fiber (SPF) coated with titanium (Ti) films in different thicknesses, namely 5 nm, 13 nm, and 36 nm, protected by a thin layer of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and tungsten disulfide (WS2), which provide ultra-sensitive sensor-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) covering from the visible to mid-infrared region. The SPF deposited with Ti exhibits strong evanescent field interaction with the MoS2 and WS2, and good optical absorption, hence resulting in high-sensitivity performance. Incremental increases in the thickness of the Ti layer contribute to the enhancement of the intensity of transmission with redshift and broad spectra. The findings show that the optimum thickness of Ti with 36 nm combined with MoS2 causes weak redshifts of the longitudinal localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) mode, while the same thickness of Ti with WS2 causes large blueshifts. The redshifts are possibly due to a reduced plasmon-coupling effect with the excitonic region of MoS2. The observed blueshifts of the LSPR peak position are possibly due to surface modification between WS2 and Ti. Changing the relative humidity from 58% to 88% only elicited a response in Ti/MoS2. Thus, MoS2 shows more sensitivity on 36-nm thickness of Ti compared with WS2. Therefore, the proposed fiber-optic sensor with integration of 2D materials is capable of measuring humidity in any environment.

1. Introduction

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a well-known optical phenomenon that occurs on a metal-dielectric surface. When free electrons oscillate on the metal surface, the surface absorbs light energy and resonates during the reflection of light at the SPR angle, which has a major attenuation effect on reflected light, as shown in Figure 1 [1]. SPR is highly sensitive to the refractive index of the material in contact with the metal, which can be used as a sensing structure such as the Kretschmann Rather prism, optical waveguides, and optical fiber [2,3,4,5]. SPR is also used as an optical phenomenon to detect molecular interaction [6].
The properties of metallic layers [7] in various environments confer SPR properties that have their own benefits, such as the fact that a beam of light cannot pass through it (it can be absorbed in a dielectric medium), and diffusion of light inside an analyte [8]. Thus, SPR is potentially focused on the characteristics of the metal and the dielectric medium layer. Titanium (Ti) has excellent characteristics, such as high corrosion resistance, and high-adhesion layer and passivation surface, which are enough properties to construct an SPR-sensor [9,10]. There are several techniques to achieve nanomaterials-based optical sensors, such as the deposition of a thin film on a fiber core, microfiber, and side-polished optical fiber [11,12,13].
The practical use of side-polished fiber has several advantages due to compactness, simple fabrication method, and low insertion loss [14]. Besides that, the use of dielectric material coating on Ti film enhances their electrical and optical properties externally. Ti in rutile forms exhibits high dielectric constant, which makes Ti more useful for sensing applications. Some features such as high surface-to-volume ratio and tunable biocompatibility are some of the factors that can enhance the sensitivity in the device. The use of Ti coating also protects the metal from oxidation [15]. Using the side-polishing technique, a single-mode fiber (SMF) can be fabricated, as the technique removes a portion of the cladding region [16,17,18]. By doing so, an evanescent field can be created whereby light escapes from the core region and is propagated within the polished surface region. The interaction of the evanescent field with the external environment forms the basis of an SPR sensor [19,20]. Using this technique, many kinds of sensors, including devices based on optical fiber sensors, can be fabricated and used in many applications such as ultraviolet (UV) power sensors, polarization controllers, and all-fiber integrated optical power monitors [21].
The side-polished technique was used in this experiment to increase sensitivity where the propagating light inside the core directly reflects or beams onto the metal-dielectric layer. The integration of several nanomaterials in the development of various optical sensors, such as TiO2 [22,23] in optical temperature sensors and alcohol sensors, reduced graphene oxide [24] as well as graphene [25,26]. Graphene has been explored widely; however, it suffers from the gapless of band-structure properties. Hitherto, several semiconducting two-dimensional materials have been recognized as excellent candidates for sensing devices in the future. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a suitable material due to its various optical characteristics such as temperature sensing [27,28,29,30], including various technological applications using WS2 [31,32]. Here, we investigated the optimum Ti thickness to provide SPR behavior with an integration layer of MoS2 and WS2 in a relative humidity (RH) sensing application in the visible to mid-infrared region.

2. Experimental

The fabrication process of polishing SMF involves using an abrasive polishing wheel. This approach requires the SMF itself with a core/cladding diameter of 9/125 µm fixed on its position by utilizing a pair of fiber holders, where a small section of coating on SMF has been stripped off. The mechanical wheel was fastened by the abrasive paper in order to control the smoothness of the polished region. This process, which tends to have a success rate close to 100%, observably reduces the polishing time and provides a uniform polished active region. Here, the actual sensing region of the SMF was a 3-mm flat transition region, as shown in the image obtained by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) in Figure 2a. SMF cladding was removed, and the loss of the fiber was recorded as -2dB during the polishing process. A broadband light source with a range of 900 nm to 1500 nm and a spectrometer were used to measure the transmission attenuation of the SPF during the experiment. The polished portion of the flat surface was coated with 5-nm, 13-nm, and 36-nm thicknesses of Ti using an electron beam evaporation machine, followed by drop cast of MoS2 and WS2 layer of about 0.2 mL. A thin layer of Ti was deposited on flat-clad less optical fiber using an electron beam evaporation machine (EB43-T) at a high vacuum pressure of 10−5–10-7 Torr. Then, the sensitivity was recorded using a humidity sensor device with different relative humidity values (RH%). At the same time, the light of the polychromatic source was launched from one end of the fiber, and the other end of the fiber was connected to an ocean optic spectrometer. The output of the transmission spectra was recorded. A schematic diagram and a real image of the experimental set-up are shown in Figure 2b,c. The set-up for characterizing the resonance peak for TiO2/MoS2 and WS2 is shown in Figure 2b,c, in which one end of the fiber was coupled to a white light source, and the output was connected to AQ6370B Optical Spectrum Analyzer (Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a spectral resolution of 2 nm with a range of 700 nm to 1800 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SPR-Transmission with Different Thicknesses of Titanium

Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the transmission spectrum of wavelength at different thicknesses for MoS2 and WS2, respectively. There were six samples that were coated with Ti at thicknesses of 5 nm, 13 nm, and 36 nm (two samples each). Samples with the same Ti thickness were tested with a layer of 2D materials: MoS2 or WS2. The effectiveness of these 2D materials was compared with regards to other thicknesses of Ti coating. The SPR for Ti was recorded at the range of 500 nm to 600 nm [16]. Based on the SPR of Ti, this range of wavelength will contribute to the most sensitive shifting due to the optimum thickness. The detection of SPR phenomena can be observed with respect to the wavelength corresponding to the transmission dip in the spectrum. The transmission dip is formed where the reflected light resonates onto the surface plasmon after it passes through the SPR region. In this work, it was determined at the other end of the optical fiber as a function of wavelength [9]. Figure 3 shows that the transmission dip for different thicknesses of Ti at 5 nm, 13 nm, and 36 nm occurred at wavelengths of 548 nm, 552 nm, and 565 nm, respectively. These three samples were tested with a monolayer of MoS2 in aqueous states. Figure 4 shows the transmission dip for different thicknesses of Ti with wavelengths of 547 nm, 551 nm, and 580 nm, respectively. These three samples were tested with a monolayer of WS2 for sensing performance. Both figures showed that the transmission dip becomes broader with increasing thickness of Ti.
For example, the Ti thickness of 5 nm has a sharper dip compared with the 13 nm and 36 nm. Based on the SPR phenomena, the number of reflections is a crucial rule that affects the width of the transmission dip in the spectrum [9]. The number of light reflections relies on the length of the sensing area and the diameter of the optic fiber. Sensitivity is explained in the next section, whereby a drop of dielectric medium such as MoS2 and WS2 was applied to form a humidity sensor. Thus, with a greater thickness of the Ti layer, the transmission-based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) shifts to the right, which increases the wavelength transmission dip. Observing the transmission spectrum, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, we can clearly see that it has a large dip in the constant range of wavelength. The modes were divided into two types: the transverse mode is the oscillation across the width of the optic fiber waveguide, and the longitudinal mode is the oscillation along the length of its cavity. In this experiment, Ti affected the transverse mode of optical-fiber-based SPR according to the characterization from the transmission electron microscope (TEM00). The allowed modes can be found by solving Maxwell’s equation for the condition of the waveguide boundary. The dip of transmission for different thickness of Ti was chosen based on the transverse mode.

3.2. Effect of TMDCs with Different Thicknesses of Titanium

We observed that no significant shifting occurred at the fixed or constant range of wavelength for a thinner layer of Ti (Figure 5a,b). This indicates that the volume of 0.2 mL was not suitable with 5-nm and 13-nm thicknesses of Ti. In Figure 5c, the transmission dip for 36 nm of Ti layer shows a positive response to the 0.2 mL of MoS2 with an initial transmission wavelength of 565 nm shifting to the right to about 588 nm, which shows low frequency at a higher wavelength. The range of transmission response recorded was about 23 nm, where the 36-nm thickness of Ti was found to be suitable for use as a sensor with 0.2 mL of MoS2. The response of MoS2 to the different thicknesses of Ti is due to characteristics such as the thickness of adhesion on the surface of Ti, which is related to the roughness of the surface. For example, Ti has high corrosion resistance and a high-adhesion layer that forms a passivation surface when exposed to surrounding air. It has also been reported that the properties of the Ti layer do not change, and it is less absorptive compared to titanium alloys. Moreover, it is good in the phase of detection. In this case, the adhesion layer of Ti plays important roles in the composition of Ti/MoS2. MoS2 also has a low shear strength of its basal planes, with a friction coefficient as low as 0.01 in a vacuum environment. Furthermore, the coating of MoS2 has low resistance and can react with O and H2O in an atmosphere of high humidity to form MoO3 and H2SO4. Both of these compounds can lead to the corrosion of metal and degradation of coatings, and the low-adhesion layer of MoS2 is covered by the high adhesion layer of Ti. Based on the shift described for 36-nm thickness of Ti, the increased thickness of Ti provides an increased adhesion layer that reduces the rough surface of the Ti/MoS2 layer.
Figure 6 shows the same phenomena with MoS2, where we observed no shifting occurring at the fixed or constant range of wavelength. Both transmission dips at 570 nm and 580 nm do not give a response with a thinner layer of Ti. This indicates that the volume of 0.2 mL of WS2 is not enough to provide sensor properties to the Ti thickness shown in Figure 6a,b. In Figure 6c, the transmission dip for the 36-nm Ti layer showed a response to the 0.2 mL of tungsten disulfide (WS2), whereby the transmission dip at 580 nm shifted to the left to about 570 nm. The left shifting is known as blueshift where it has a higher frequency at a lower wavelength. The range of transmission response was large, about -15nm. The negative sign is functional, as the transmission wavelength is reduced. Due to the response of shifting, the 36-nm thickness of Ti appears suitable with 0.2 mL of WS2.
From Figure 5 and Figure 6 we observe some differences in shifting. For example, right shifting (redshift) and left shifting (blueshift) are occurring for the 36-nm thickness of Ti when coated with MoS2 and WS2, respectively. The shifting whether left (blueshift) or right (redshift) is due to the shape and size resonance frequency of the particle of material. The red shifting occurs based on the increase in the dielectric constant that surrounds the medium where it has low frequency and high wavelength. Besides that, the formation of blueshifts happens according to the decreasing particle size where it has high frequency and low wavelength. The frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength. The shape character tends to become more complex while the orientation of particles of the medium or material leads to additional resonance [20]. Therefore, the polarization of the medium also provides another way to observe the SPR shift, besides the shape and size of the particles. A greater polarization of the medium is created due to the increase in dielectric function by a higher refractive index. The greater polarization of the medium will reduce the collective charge in the resonance phase. The attenuation of the particle electric charge tends to reduce the electric force that will reduce the resonance frequency, and the transmission dip will be redshifted. This phenomenon can be verified by using the simulation of Mie theory. It is the surrounding medium that determines the resonance frequency of a particle besides its size and shape. In case of metallic particles, the frequency of the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) is always redshifted compared to the plasma frequency. A decrease in size leads to a blueshift (higher frequency), while an increase in the dielectric constant of the surrounding medium leads to a redshift (lower frequency). The influence of shape can be very complex and lead to additional resonances (e.g., in the case of cubes) and/or dependence on the orientation of the particles (e.g., in cases of ellipsoids). The spectrum featured a slight blueshift as a contribution emission of WS2 due to the arisen LSPR, as reported by Choi et al. [33]. A model dispersion of SPR was successfully modeled and reported by Yuk Sun Jung et al. [34], where a metal of finite extent and juxtaposed with a dielectric can be supported at the metal/dielectric interface. Surface plasmons have a divergence-free (∇·D = 0) transverse electromagnetic mode associated with charge density oscillations at the interface. The resonance condition of this surface-bound wave is sensitive to the size and geometry of the metal and its surrounding dielectric. Where here, in the case of a planar metal/dielectric interface, surface plasmons (SPs) experience a medium with an effective dielectric constant, εmεd/(εm + εd), and the surface plasmon resonance frequency ωsp is determined from the condition, εmsp) + εdsp) = 0. The presence of the dielectric material causes the SP resonance frequency (ωsp) to be redshifted from that of the bulk plasmon frequency (ωp). The consequence of blueshifts is due to surface modification and interaction between layer of WS2 and Ti where it intrinsically distributed resonant cavity of (SP) dispersion.

3.3. Sensitivity in Relation to Relative Humidity (RH%)

Sensitivity of Best Thickness of Ti with MoS2

In Figure 7 and Figure 8, we have simplified by selecting only 36-nm Ti due to its response when tested with MoS2 and WS2. Figure 7 shows that with MoS2, there was a change in the shift of the transmission dip when the relative humidity changed from 58% to 88%. The transmission dips for 58% and 88% of relative humidity were at wavelengths of 577 nm and 581 nm, respectively. Therefore, MoS2 appears to be highly sensitive toward 36-nm titanium in a constant range of transmission wavelength. The selection of the transmission dip in the humidity sensor was based on the similar shape of the transmission dip in the spectrum of Ti-MoS2 (36 nm) at 588 nm. Figure 8 shows the spectra with WS2 when the RH% changes from 45% to 70% as there is no shift of the transmission dip. Thus, it appears that WS2 was not as sensitive toward 36-nm titanium in the constant range of transmission wavelength even in higher RH%. The selection of transmission dip in the humidity sensor was based on the similar shape of the transmission dip for Ti-WS2. The sensitivity of the humidity sensor can be evaluated by the range of relative power based on the optical characteristics divided by the range of relative humidity (∆RP/∆RH) [16]. However, in this case, the sensitivity was determined by observing the response of shifting in the transmission dip. Therefore, compared with WS2, MoS2 was more sensitive when reacting with titanium.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the range of surface plasmon resonance for titanium was around 500–600 nm. The selection of the transmission dip of different thickness in terms of surface plasmon resonance was based on the transverse mode related to the Maxwell equation. The shifting dip is then observed with the same shape of dip selected with the first sample. Higher thickness of Ti coating results in increased wavelength of the transmission dip with broadening in the spectrum. Both thickness of 5 nm and 13 nm of titanium did not show a reaction when applying the MoS2 or WS2 layer. Only the 36-nm titanium reacted when coated with MoS2 and WS2 due to the adhesion layer of titanium and structure of the dielectric medium (MoS2 or WS2). Thus, the best thickness of titanium when coated by either MoS2 or WS2 was 36 nm. These shift in different directions, with Ti (36-nm)/MoS2 and Ti (36-nm)/WS2 shifting to the right (redshift) and left (blueshift), respectively. The redshift has low frequency, while the blueshift has high frequency, with the frequency being inversely proportional to the wavelength. The size and shape of the particle affected the resonance and produced the direction of shifting. Therefore, we simplified the detection of sensitivity using a 36-nm thickness of the titanium layer, as this was the only one showing shifting. The sensitivity was determined by observing the shifting of the transmission dip due to the changes in relative humidity (RH%). The selection of the transmission dip in humidity sensing was based on a similar shape as the transmission dip of Ti(36-nm)/MoS2 or Ti(36-nm)/WS2. MoS2 was more sensitive to the Ti layer compared with WS2.

Author Contributions

N.A.M.Z., T.C.T., R.R. and M.F.R. have involved in designing, fabricating and running the experiment of optical fiber, R.Z., I.S.A. and S.W.H. have contributed to organizing the paper as well as writing and analyzing the findings.

Funding

This research was funded by FRGS Grant FP034-2017A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otto, A. Excitation of nonradiative surface plasma waves in silver by the method of frustrated total reflection. Z. Phys. Hadron. Nucl. 1968, 216, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luan, N.; Wang, R.; Lv, W.; Yao, J. Surface plasmon resonance sensor based on D-shaped microstructured optical fiber with hollow core. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 8576–8582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ahmad, H.; Amiri, I.S.; Soltanian, M.R.K.; Narimani, L.; Zakaria, R.; Ismail, M.F.; Thambiratnam, K. High sensitivity surface plasmon resonance (SPR) refractive index sensor in 1.5 μm. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amiri, I.S.; Ariannejad, M.M.; Tajdidzadeh, M.; Sorger, V.J.; Ling, X.; Yupapin, P. Fast and slow light generated by surface plasmon wave and gold grating coupling effects. Indian J. Phys. 2018, 92, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amiri, I.S.; Sorger, V.J.; Yupapin, P. Zinc Oxide nanowire gratings for light absorption control through polarization manipulation. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2019, 108, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Drescher, D.G.; Drescher, M.J.; Ramakrishnan, N.A. Surface plasmon resonance (spr) analysis of binding interactions of proteins in inner-ear sensory epithelia. In Auditory and Vestibular Research: Methods and Protocols; Sokolowski, B., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 323–343. [Google Scholar]
  7. Homola, J.; Piliarik, M. Surface plasmon resonance (spr) sensors. In Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 45–67. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sadrolhosseini, A.R.; Noor, A.S.M.; Moksin, M.M. Application of surface plasmon resonance based on a metal nanoparticle. In Plasmonics-Principles and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirata, I.; Yoshida, Y.; Nagaoka, N.; Hiasa, K.; Abe, Y.; Maekawa, K.; Kuboki, T.; Akagawa, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Van Meerbeek, B. Real time assessment of surface interactions with a titanium passivation layer by surface plasmon resonance. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1260–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Zhou, H.; Zheng, J.; Wen, Q.P.; Wan, Z.H.; Sang, R.P. The effect of ti content on the structural and mechanical properties of MoS2-Ti composite coatings deposited by unbalanced magnetron sputtering system. Phys. Procedia 2011, 18, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lin, Y.; Zou, Y.; Lindquist, R.G. A reflection-based localized surface plasmon resonance fiber-optic probe for biochemical sensing. Biomed. Opt. Express 2011, 2, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Luo, H.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, L. Highly birefringent d-shaped microfiber and its application in high-sensitive optical sensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 4793–4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, L.; Feng, Y.; Xing, Z.; Chen, Z.; Yu, J.; Guan, H.; Lu, H.; Fang, J.; Zhong, Y. High-sensitivity humidity sensing of side-polished optical fiber with polymer nanostructure cladding. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 2539–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ten, S. Ultra low-loss optical fiber technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 20–24 March 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, X.; Huang, T.; Ping, P.; Wu, X.; Huang, P.; Pan, J.; Wu, Y.; Cheng, Z. Sensitivity enhancement in surface plasmon resonance biochemical sensor based on transition metal dichalcogenides/graphene heterostructure. Sensors 2018, 18, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kanmani, R.; Zainuddin, N.; Rusdi, M.; Harun, S.; Ahmed, K.; Amiri, I.; Zakaria, R. Effects of TiO2 on the performance of silver coated on side-polished optical fiber for alcohol sensing applications. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 50, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmed, K.; Paul, B.K.; Vasudevan, B.; Rashed, A.N.Z.; Maheswar, R.; Amiri, I.; Yupapin, P. Design of D-shaped elliptical core photonic crystal fiber for blood plasma cell sensing application. Results Phys. 2019, 12, 2021–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yusoff, S.F.A.Z.; Mezher, M.; Amiri, I.S.; Ayyanar, N.; Vigneswaran, D.; Ahmad, H.; Zakaria, R. Detection of moisture content in transformer oil using platinum coated on D-shaped optical fiber. Optic. Fiber Technol. 2018, 45, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amiri, I.; Azzuhri, S.; Jalil, M.; Hairi, H.; Ali, J.; Bunruangses, M.; Yupapin, P. Introduction to photonics: Principles and the most recent applications of microstructures. Micromachines 2018, 9, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Udaiyakumar, R.; Junaid, K.M.; Janani, T.; Maheswar, R.; Yupapin, P.; Amiri, I. Optical properties study of nano-composite filled d shape photonic crystal fibre. Result Phys. 2018, 9, 1040–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, Y.; Chen, C.; Xia, K.; Peng, S.; Guan, H.; Tang, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Tungsten disulfide (WS2) based all-fiber-optic humidity sensor. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 8956–8966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, H.; Tian, Z.; Yu, H.; Yang, B.; Jing, G.; Liao, G.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Tang, J.; Luo, Y.; et al. Optical fiber with nanostructured cladding of TiO2 nanoparticles self-assembled onto a side polished fiber and its temperature sensing. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 32502–32508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yusoff, S.F.A.Z.; Lim, C.S.; Azzuhri, S.R.; Ahmad, H.; Zakaria, R. Studies of Ag/TiO2 plasmonics structures integrated in side polished optical fiber used as humidity sensor. Results Phys. 2018, 10, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abid; Sehrawat, P.; Islam, S.S.; Mishra, P.; Ahmad, S. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) based wideband optical sensor and the role of temperature, defect states and quantum efficiency. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lai, K.W.C.; Xi, N.; Fung, C.K.M.; Chen, H. Development of Optical Sensors Using Graphene Chapter 12. In Nano Optoelectronic Sensors and Devices; Xi, N., Lai, K.W.C., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu, Y.; Yao, B.; Yu, C.; Rao, Y. Optical graphene gas sensors based on microfibers: A review. Sensors 2018, 18, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ouyang, T.; Lin, L.; Xia, K.; Jiang, M.; Lang, Y.; Guan, H.; Yu, J.; Li, D.; Chen, G.; Zhu, W.; et al. Enhanced optical sensitivity of molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) coated side polished fiber for humidity sensing. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 9823–9833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Du, B.; Yang, D.; She, X.; Yuan, Y.; Mao, D.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, F. MoS2-based all-fiber humidity sensor for monitoring human breath with fast response and recovery. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 251, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Niu, Y.; Wang, R.; Jiao, W.; Ding, G.; Hao, L.; Yang, F.; He, X. MoS2 graphene fiber based gas sensing devices. Carbon 2015, 95, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohanraj, J.; Velmurugan, V.; Sathiyan, S.; Sivabalan, S. All fiber-optic ultra-sensitive temperature sensor using few-layer MoS2 coated D-shaped fiber. Opt. Commun. 2018, 406, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, J.-H.; Tan, J.; Wu, G.-X.; Zhang, X.-J.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.-Q. Tunable and enhanced light emission in hybrid WS2-optical-fiber-nanowire structures. Light Sci. Appl. 2019, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mayorga-Martinez, C.C.; Ambrosi, A.; Eng, A.Y.S.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Metallic 1T-WS2 for selective impedimetric vapor sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5611–5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Choi, S.Y.; Yip, C.T.; Li, G.-C.; Lei, D.Y.; Fung, K.H.; Yu, S.F.; Hao, J. Photoluminescence enhancement in few-layer WS2 films via au nanoparticles. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 067148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jung, Y.S.; Wuenschell, J.; Kim, H.K.; Kaur, P.; Waldeck, D.H. Blue-shift of surface plasmon resonance in a metal nanoslit array structure. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 16081–16091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of light propagation inside the optical fiber.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of light propagation inside the optical fiber.
Micromachines 10 00465 g001
Figure 2. (a) Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image of side-polished single-mode fiber (SMF). (b) Experimental diagram of Ti/MoS2/WS2 RH sensor; SPW = surface plasmon wave. (c) Humidity sensor set-up in the laboratory.
Figure 2. (a) Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) image of side-polished single-mode fiber (SMF). (b) Experimental diagram of Ti/MoS2/WS2 RH sensor; SPW = surface plasmon wave. (c) Humidity sensor set-up in the laboratory.
Micromachines 10 00465 g002
Figure 3. Dip of transmission based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with different thicknesses of titanium set for MoS2.
Figure 3. Dip of transmission based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with different thicknesses of titanium set for MoS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g003
Figure 4. Dip of transmission based on SPR with different thicknesses of titanium set for WS2.
Figure 4. Dip of transmission based on SPR with different thicknesses of titanium set for WS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g004
Figure 5. Dip of transmission based on SPR with (a) 5-nm, (b) 13-nm, and (c) 36-nm thickness of titanium covered with MoS2.
Figure 5. Dip of transmission based on SPR with (a) 5-nm, (b) 13-nm, and (c) 36-nm thickness of titanium covered with MoS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g005
Figure 6. Dip of transmission based on SPR with (a) 5-nm, (b) 13-nm, and (c) 36-nm thickness of titanium by covered with WS2.
Figure 6. Dip of transmission based on SPR with (a) 5-nm, (b) 13-nm, and (c) 36-nm thickness of titanium by covered with WS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g006
Figure 7. Sensitivity of 36-nm thickness of titanium covered by MoS2, Ti (36-nm)/MoS2.
Figure 7. Sensitivity of 36-nm thickness of titanium covered by MoS2, Ti (36-nm)/MoS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g007
Figure 8. Sensitivity of 36-nm thickness of titanium covered by WS2, Ti (36-nm)/WS2.
Figure 8. Sensitivity of 36-nm thickness of titanium covered by WS2, Ti (36-nm)/WS2.
Micromachines 10 00465 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zakaria, R.; Zainuddin, N.A.M.; Leong, T.C.; Rosli, R.; Rusdi, M.F.; Harun, S.W.; Sadegh Amiri, I. Investigation of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) in MoS2- and WS2-Protected Titanium Side-Polished Optical Fiber as a Humidity Sensor. Micromachines 2019, 10, 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10070465

AMA Style

Zakaria R, Zainuddin NAM, Leong TC, Rosli R, Rusdi MF, Harun SW, Sadegh Amiri I. Investigation of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) in MoS2- and WS2-Protected Titanium Side-Polished Optical Fiber as a Humidity Sensor. Micromachines. 2019; 10(7):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10070465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zakaria, Rozalina, Nur Aina’a Mardhiah Zainuddin, Tan Chee Leong, Rosnadiya Rosli, Muhammad Farid Rusdi, Sulaiman Wadi Harun, and Iraj Sadegh Amiri. 2019. "Investigation of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) in MoS2- and WS2-Protected Titanium Side-Polished Optical Fiber as a Humidity Sensor" Micromachines 10, no. 7: 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10070465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop