Next Article in Journal
Activities and Effects of Ergot Alkaloids on Livestock Physiology and Production
Next Article in Special Issue
O’Leary-Sant Symptom Index Predicts the Treatment Outcome for OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections for Refractory Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Deoxynivalenol & Deoxynivalenol-3-Glucoside Mitigation through Bakery Production Strategies: Effective Experimental Design within Industrial Rusk-Making Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Treatment of Chronic Migraine with OnabotulinumtoxinA: Mode of Action, Efficacy and Safety
Article Menu

Export Article

Toxins 2015, 7(8), 2791-2800; doi:10.3390/toxins7082791

Review
Temporomandibular Myofacial Pain Treated with Botulinum Toxin Injection
1
Mount Sinai Roosevelt Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY 10019, USA
2
Head and Neck Surgical Group—New York Center for Voice and Swallowing Disorders, New York, NY 10019, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Holger Barth
Received: 14 June 2015 / Accepted: 13 July 2015 / Published: 24 July 2015

Abstract

: This article reviews the diagnoses and treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and outlines of the role of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in the treatment of myofacial TMD. This manuscript includes a brief history of the use of BoNT in the treatment of pain, the mechanism of action of BoNT, and the techniques for injections, adverse effects and contraindications when using BoNT to treat mayofacial pain caused by TMD.
Keywords:
temporomandibular joint; temporomandibular disorders; botulinum toxin; myofacial pain

1. Introduction

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a hinged synovial joint that connects the mandible to the temporal bone at the skull base, and the posterior boarder of the TMJ is the anterior boarder of the external auditory canal. The TMJ is one of the few synovial joints with an articular disc and it functions as both a hinge joint and a sliding joint. It is therefore classified as a ginglymoarthrodial joint. Adduction of the mandible, or mouth closing, is performed by the actions of the masseter, temporalis, and medial pterygoid muscles. Abduction, or mouth opening, is performed by the lateral pterygoids and digastric musculature. The lateral deviation occurs by the action of the contralateral lateral pterygoid muscles, and protrusion of the mandible occurs when right and left lateral pterygoid muscles contract simultaneously.

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a nonspecific term used to describe orthopedic and myofascial disorders that affect the TMJ. The prevalence of TMD is between 30% and 44%, with up to 25% of the population seeking professional care for TMD [1]. Symptoms are commonly related to pain surrounding the joint and may include headache, periauricular pain, neck pain, decreased jaw excursion, jaw locking, and noise at the joint with movement. In general TMD is divided into myofacial TMD or arthrogenic TMD. Myofacial TMD is associated with the pain from hyperfunctioning muscles of mastication leading to chronic myositis. In contrast, arthrogenic TMD is associated intracapsular pathology with pain at the level of the joint itself.

2. Diagnosing Temporomandibular Disorders

The diagnosis of TMD is based on history and physical exam findings. Patients should be asked about nighttime bruxism, jaw soreness, morning headaches, use of mouth orthodonitics, or history of trauma. Questions regarding the patient’s personal habits and diet should be evaluated to reduce behaviors that may place additional stress on the TMJ, like frequent gum chewing. Symptoms of depression, anxiety or recent stressors should also be assessed as these conditions often lead to unconsciously clench.

Signs and symptoms of TMD may include joint or muscular pain with or without jaw opening/closing, limited jaw movement, cracking or popping sounds at the TMJ with movement, or headaches. Patients often present with otalgia, ear fullness or tinnitus which is referred from the anterior external auditory canal, and is a shared boarder with the posterior TMJ [2]. In addition otalgia may be referred from muscles of mastication as some middle ear muscles (tensor tympani and tensor palatini) are also innervated by the trigeminal nerve [3]. Some patients with TMD have complained of unilateral and boring orbital or periorbital pain, which could be neurogenic or due to hyperfunctioning temporalis muscles [4,5,6].

Imaging studies are rarely obtained at the initial visit, and are generally used only when there is dysfunction of the articular disc or other disorders that may complicate the diagnosis like rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis or trauma [7]. If imaging is obtained, a panoramic plain film of the jaws is usually the initial imaging modality with maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joints obtained when a more detailed anatomical examination is necessary.

In 1992, The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was established to standardize the clinical assessment of patients with TMD. RDC/TMD classifies TMD into two categories (Axis 1 and Axis 2). Axis 1 focuses on physical symptoms like myofascial pain, temporomandibular disc displacement, and joint disorders including arthralgias, arthritis, and arthrosis. Axis 2 focuses on quality of life and psychosocial factors like depression, pain related disability and behavioral adaptions [8]. Today, RDC/TMD is used mainly for research purposes, and is rarely used in clinical diagnosis.

3. Treating Temporomandibular Disorders

Treatments for TMD range from nonpharmacologic therapy, conservative pharmicothearpy and open surgery. The initial management consists of nonpharmacologic management and typically includes avoiding triggers, adjusting diet, pain management, physical therapy and warm compress. Patients with bruxism should be referred to a dentist and can be evaluated for an occlusal splint. Systemic pharmacotherapy for TMD may be used as adjuctive therapy and includes anti-inflammatory agents, muscle relaxants, analgesics and in some cases tricyclic antidepressants [9,10,11,12]. Other less conventional approaches include acupuncture, biofeedback or cognitive behavioral therapy [13,14,15]. Selected patients with arthrogenic TMD may benefit from intra-articular corticosteroid injections, arthrocentesis or arthroscopic surgery. Despite the effectiveness of analgesic pain medications, response to opioid therapy is often incomplete with approximately three quarters of patients suffering from persistent pain [16]. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection has therefore become an attractive choice as adjuvant therapy in patients with myofacial TMD who do not achieve a complete response with conservative management and pharmacotherapy.

4. Botulinum Toxin

The first indication that BoNT could be useful for treating pain was observed from anecdotal reports of patients treated for hyperfunctional facial lines who reported reduced frequency and severity of headache [17]. Soon thereafter, the pain-relieving effect of BoNT was reported during the treatment of oromandibular dystonia and cervical dystonia [18,19,20,21,22]. Today, BoNT is used for pain relief in numerous conditions including tension headaches, migraine headaches, post-herpetic neuralgia and myofacial TMD [23,24,25,26,27].

5. Botulinum Toxin Mechanism of Action

BoNT is a 150-Kilodalton exotoxin produced from clostridium botulinum, whose action is mediated through the cleavage of docking proteins that are responsible for membrane fusion of pre-synaptic vesicles. Type A bolulinum toxin (BoNT-A) cleaves the membrane associated protein “synaptosomal-associated protein 25” (SNAP-25) which is a member of the “soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor protein (SNARE). Type B botulinum toxin (BoNT-B) cleaves synaptobravin, which is part of the vesicular-associated membrane protein (VAMP). Cleavage of these docking proteins leads to muscle weakens by inhibition of acetylcholine (Ach) release at the neuromuscular junction. In addition to blocking the activity of muscles, BoNT has been known to inhibit the release for mediators from numerous secretory glands including salivary glands, sweat glands and nasal mucosa [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].

Chronic local muscular contracture has been known to cause inflammation and localized muscular hypoxia leading to chronic myofascial pain [41]. However, the analgesic effect of BoNT comes from more than just stress relief to the musculature. BoNT has a direct effect on nociceptors and the parasympathetic nervous system [42]. Inflammatory mediators like calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P and glutamate are also regulated by SNARE and VAMP docking proteins and, their release is inhibited by BoNT. The effect of BoNT also effects pain processing which reduces central pain sensitization, the driving mechanism of chronic pain. A-delta sensory fibers, which mediate acute pain, and A-beta fibers, which mediate touch and pressure, are not mediated by neuropeptide release and are unaffected by BoNT. Thus, BoNT does not interfere with the perception of acute pain nor does it cause local anesthesia.

6. Botulinum Toxin Injection Technique

The most commonly affected muscles are the temporalis muscle, masseter muscle and lateral pterigoid muscles. The temporalis muscle and masseter muscle are almost always involved and usually manifest as direct muscle pain. Lateral pterygoids involvement usually manifests as buccal pain, lateral jaw deviation or bruxism [43].

Although Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA), Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA), Xeomin (incobotulinumtoxinA) or Myobloc (rimabotulinumtoxinB) have been approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for various other conditions including bladder dysfunction, chronic migraine, upper limb spasticity, cervical dystonia, primary axillary hyperhidrosis, blepharospasm, strabismus, glabellar rhytides and lateral canthal rhytides, no product is currently approved by the FDA to treat TMD [44]. Furthermore, there is no established method to calculate equivalent doses between different BoNT products. The potency per unit of one product is not interchangeable with other preparations and each may have different safety and efficacy characteristics. It is therefore important that clinicians be familiar with the various formulations prior to their use [45].

We performe injections under the guidance of electromyography (EMG) using a 27-gauge monopolar electrode injection needle. The temporalis and masseter muscles are injected transcutaneously (Figure 1). Asking the patient to clench their teeth will aid in precise EMG localization. Identification of the lateral pterygoid muscle is done intraorally with the EMG needle placed between the pterygoid plate and the coronoid process of the mandible (Figure 2). In this fashion injection is achieved along the length of the muscle, and confirmation of intramuscular injection is obtained by robust EMG signaling with lateral jaw movements.

Figure 1. Facial diagram of trancutaneous needle placement for injection of botulinum toxin to the temporalis and masseter muscles. Reproduced from [46]. Copyright Elsevier Inc., 2004.
Figure 1. Facial diagram of trancutaneous needle placement for injection of botulinum toxin to the temporalis and masseter muscles. Reproduced from [46]. Copyright Elsevier Inc., 2004.
Toxins 07 02791 g001 1024
Figure 2. Photograph of intraoral EMG guided injection of botulinum toxin to the lateral pterygoid muscle (EMG electromyography). Reproduced from [47]. Copyright Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 2012.
Figure 2. Photograph of intraoral EMG guided injection of botulinum toxin to the lateral pterygoid muscle (EMG electromyography). Reproduced from [47]. Copyright Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 2012.
Toxins 07 02791 g002 1024

We typically use a concentration of 2.5–5.0 units per 0.1 mL of Botox witha starting dose of 10–25 units for each temporalis muscle, 25–50 units to the masseter muscles and 7.5–10 units to the lateral pterygoids. Subsequent doses are individualized and are based on the patients’ response. Botox diffuses to about 1 cm at each injection site, and affected areas may be left untreated if an inadequate number of sites are infiltrated within a single muscle group. To avoid an incomplete response, we advocate using lower concentrations at multiple sites with larger injection volumes.

7. Therapeutic Effects of Botulinum Toxin

Approximately 3-4 weeks after the initial injection, patients will return for reevaluation and documentation any adverse effects and/or suboptimal responses. Some patients may require a booster injection at that time. Additional BoNT injections are directed by the patients’ history and clinical examination, and pain diaries are a useful guide to help in patient directed therapy. It may take several weeks before patients experience the maximum pain relief from BoNT. Althoguth the typical duration of efficacy is 12 weeks, we have noted tremendous variability among patients with respect to optimal dosing frequency. Some patients experience relief well beyond the predicted pharmacokinetic duration of the drug supporting the possibility that BoNT does not strictly act at the periphery and may be involved in neuromodulation at the level of the central nervous system. It is important to note that an individual patient’s response to toxin may change over time, which further supports the importance of patient directed dosing [48].

8. Adverse Effects of Botulinum Toxin

BoNT injection for TMD is administered in relatively small doses and way below the estimated lethal dose of approximately 3000 units. Because of the relative low dosing profile, adverse effects are uncommon and often mild. Difficulty chewing is the most common adverse effect, which results from local muscle weakness and is usually dose dependent. Muscle atrophy may result in cosmetic alterations and is another risk of the procedure. Higher volume of BoNT increased the risk of diffusion of toxin to nearby areas which may cause brow ptosis, blepharoptosis or diplopia if the temporalis muscle is injected too close to the orbit. Facial asymmetry may result if the masseter muscle is injected too close to the zygomaticus major [39,41,47,49]. We therefore recommend directing the needle laterally when injecting to minimize this diffusion effect. Dry mouth may occur if BoNT is injected into the parotid gland. Flu-like syndromes rarely occur and and are usually of brief duration. In addition, with any injection there is an inherent risk associated with a needle puncture, such as bruising and local tenderness.

9. Contraindications to Botulinum Toxin

Contraindications to BoNT use include a known allergy to BoNT, active inflammation or infection at the proposed injection site, pregnancy, breast-feeding, or chronic degenerative neuromuscular disorders like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, muscular dystrophy or multiple sclerosis. Patients taking aminoglycoside antibiotics should not receive BoNT injections because this class of antibiotics may interfere with the neuromuscular transmission of toxin and potentiate the effect of BoNT [50].

10. Botulinum Toxin Outcomes

Numerous studies have shown that BoNT provides long-term relief of myofacial TMD by decreasing the intensity, frequency, and duration of recurrent episodes. Freund et al reported on 46 patients with TMD treated with 150 units of BoNT-A to the masseters and termporalis muscles. They found significant reductions in their subjective and objective pain scores, and all patients with restricted mouth opening had some degree of improved range of motion. They also reported successful treatment various conditions that fall under the general category of TMD such as bruxism and clenching, oromandibular dystonias, trismus, masseter and temporalis hypertrophy, and headaches [51]. In an open-label study of roughly 100 patients with TMD the senior author found a 70% response rate to BoNT-A injections to the masseter, temporalis and lateral pterygoid muscles. Response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction of subjective pain and/or frequency of pain [46]. In a multicenter randomized double-blind, placebo controlled fixed dose study (50 units Botox to each masseter muscle and 25 units Botox to each temporalis muscle), reduction of subjective pain and tenderness to palpation was greatest at eight weeks following injections [52]. The authors of this study also noted a decrease in the average daily use of pain medication over the 16 week duration of this study.

11. Summary

Temporomandibular disorder is a common cause of chronic facial pain and is known to interfere with personal relations, professional duties, and overall quality of life. Appropriate diagnosis allows physicians to identify the disorder and initiate an effective therapeutic plan. Botulinum toxin has provided long-term relief of TMD by reducing the intensity, frequency, and duration of recurrent episodes. Adverse effects from BoNT injections are uncommon, mild and transient making it an attractive option for adjunctive therapy for myofacial TMD in patients who have failed initial conservative therapy and systemic pharmacotherapy.

Author Contributions

Andrew Blitzer MD DDS designed and performed the procedures. Niv Mor MD and Andrew Blitzer MD DDS analyzed the date. Niv Mor MD wrote the paper. Niv Mor MD, Christopher Tang MD and Andrew Blitzer edited the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schwarz, M.; Freund, B. Treatment of temporomandibular disorders with botulinum toxin. Clin. J. Pain 2002, 18 (Suppl. 6), 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuttila, S.; Kuttila, M.; le Bell, Y.; Alanen, P.; Suonpää, J. Characteristics of subjects with secondary otalgia. J. Orofac. Pain 2004, 18, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ren, Y.F.; Isberg, A. Tinnitus in patients with temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Cranio 1995, 13, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Mehta, N.R.; Forgione, A.G.; Rosenbaum, R.S.; Holmberg, R. “TMJ” triad of dysfunctions: A biologic basis of diagnosis and treatment. J. Mass. Dent. Soc. 1984, 33, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Fernandez de las Peñas, C.; Cuadrado, M.L.; Gerwin, R.D.; Pareja, J.A. Referred pain from the trochlear region in tension-type headache: A myofascial trigger point from the superior oblique muscle. Headache 2005, 45, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kalina, R.; Orcutt, J. Ocular and periocular pain. In The Management of Pain; Bonica, J.J., Ed.; Lee and Ferbiger: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Petscavage-Thomas, J.M.; Walker, E.A. Unlocking the jaw: Advanced imaging of the temporomandibular joint. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 203, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dworkin, S.F.; LeResche, L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J. Craniomandib. Disord. Facial Oral Pain 1992, 6, 301–355. [Google Scholar]
  9. List, T.; Axelsson, S.; Leijon, G. Pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders, atypical facial pain, and burning mouth syndrome. A qualitative systematic review. J. Orofac. Pain 2003, 17, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Herman, C.R.; Schiffman, E.L.; Look, J.O.; Rindal, D.B. The effectiveness of adding pharmacologic treatment with clonazepam or cyclobenzaprine to patient education and self-care for the treatment of jaw pain upon awakening: A randomized clinical trial. J. Orofac. Pain 2002, 16, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Denucci, D.J.; Dionne, R.A.; Dubner, R. Identifying a neurobiologic basis for drug therapy in TMDs. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1996, 127, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Singer, E.; Dionne, R. A controlled evaluation of ibuprofen and diazepam for chronic orofacial muscle pain. J. Orofac. Pain 1997, 11, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Dworkin, S.F.; Turner, J.A.; Mancl, L.; Wilson, L.; Massoth, D.; Huggins, K.H.; LeResche, L.; Truelove, E. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders. J. Orofac. Pain 2002, 16, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Stowell, A.W.; Gatchel, R.J.; Wildenstein, L. Cost-effectiveness of treatments for temporomandibular disorders: Biopsychosocial intervention versus treatment as usual. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2007, 138, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aggarwal, V.R.; Lovell, K.; Peters, S.; Javidi, H.; Joughin, A.; Goldthorpe, J. Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 11, CD008456. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Zenz, M.; Strumpf, M.; Tryba, M. Long-term oral opioid therapy in patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 1992, 7, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Binder, W.J.; Brin, M.F.; Blitzer, A.; Schoenrock, L.; Pagoda, J. Botulinum toxin Type A (Botox) for Treatment of Migrain Headaches, an open label study. Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg. 2000, 123, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brin, M.F.; Blitzer, A.; Herman, S.; Steward, C. Oromandibular dystonia: Treatmentof 96 patients with botulinum toxin A. In Therapy with Botulinum Toxin; Jankovic, J., Hallett, M., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 429–435. [Google Scholar]
  19. Blitzer, A.; Brin, M.F.; Greene, P.E.; Fahn, S. Botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of oromandibular dystonia. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1989, 98, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sinclair, C.F.; Gurey, L.E.; Blitzer, A. Oromandibular dystonia: Long-term management with botulinum toxin. Laryngoscope 2013, 123, 3078–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Winner, P.K.; Sadowsky, C.H.; Martinez, W.C.; Zuniga, J.A.; Poulette, A. Concurrent onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of cervical dystonia and concomitant migraine. Headache 2012, 52, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ondo, W.G.; Gollomp, S.; Galvez-Jimenez, N. A pilot study of botulinum toxin A for headache in cervical dystonia. Headache 2005, 45, 1073–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aurora, S.K.; Dodick, D.W.; Turkel, C.C.; DeGryse, R.E.; Silberstein, S.D.; Lipton, R.B.; Diener, H.C.; Brin, M.F. PREEMPT 1 Chronic Migraine Study Group. Onabotulinumtoxina for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the preempt 1 trial. Cephalalgia 2010, 30, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Diener, H.C.; Dodick, D.W.; Aurora, S.K.; Turkel, C.C.; DeGryse, R.E.; Lipton, R.B.; Silberstein, S.D.; Brin, M.F. PREEMPT 2 Chronic Migraine Study Group. Onabotulinumtoxina for treatment of chronic migraine: Results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the preempt 2 trial. Cephalalgia 2010, 30, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dodick, D.W.; Turkel, C.C.; DeGryse, R.E.; Aurora, S.K.; Silberstein, S.D.; Lipton, R.B.; Diener, H.C.; Brin, M.F. PREEMPT Chronic Migraine Study Group. Onabotulinumtoxina for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the preempt clinical program. Headache 2010, 50, 921–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Durham, P.L.; Cady, R. Insights into the mechanism of onabotulinumtoxina in chronic migraine. Headache 2011, 51, 1573–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jackson, J.L.; Kuriyama, A.; Hayashino, Y. Botulinum toxin a for prophylactic treatment of migraine and tension headaches in adults: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2012, 307, 1736–1745. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Lagalla, G.; Millevolte, M.; Capecci, M.; Provinciali, L.; Ceravolo, M.G. Botulinum toxin type a for drooling in Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Mov. Disord. 2006, 21, 704–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mancini, F.; Zangaglia, R.; Cristina, S.; Sommaruga, M.G.; Martignoni, E.; Nappi, G.; Pacchetti, C. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type a in the treatment of drooling in parkinsonism. Mov. Disord. 2003, 18, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ondo, W.G.; Hunter, C.; Moore, W. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of botulinum toxin b for sialorrhea in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2004, 62, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ellies, M.; Gottstein, U.; Rohrbach-Volland, S.; Arglebe, C.; Laskawi, R. Reduction of salivary flow with botulinumtoxin: Extended report on 33 patients with drooling, salivary fistulas, and sialadenitis. Laryngoscope 2004, 114, 1856–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, T.Y.; Jung, Y.G.; Kim, Y.H.; Jang, T.Y. A comparison of the effects of botulinum toxin a and steroid injection on nasal allergy. Otolaryngoloy-Head Neck Surg. 2008, 139, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rohrbach, S.; Junghans, K.; Kohler, S.; Laskawi, R. Minimally invasive application of botulinum toxin a in patients with idiopathic rhinitis. Head Face Med. 2009, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sapci, T.; Yazici, S.; Evcimik, M.F.; Bozkurt, Z.; Karavus, A.; Ugurl, B.; Ozkurt, E. Investigation of the effects of intranasal botulinum toxin type a and ipratropium bromide nasal spray on nasal hypersecretion in idiopathic rhinitis without eosinophilia. Rhinology 2008, 46, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Beerens, A.J.; Snow, G.B. Botulinum toxin a in the treatment of patients with Frey syndrome. Br. J. Surg. 2002, 89, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cantarella, G.; Berlusconi, A.; Mele, V.; Cogiamanian, F.; Barbieri, S. Treatment of Frey’s syndrome with botulinum toxin type b. Otolaryngoloy-Head Neck Surg. 2010, 143, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. De Bree, R.; Duyndam, J.E.; Kuik, D.J.; Leemans, C.R. Repeated botulinum toxin type a injections to treat patients with Frey syndrome. Arch. Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 2009, 135, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Drobik, C.; Laskawi, R. Frey’s syndrome: Treatment with botulinum toxin. Acta Otolaryngol. 1995, 115, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pomprasit, M.; Chintrakarn, C. Treatment of Frey’s syndrome with botulinum toxin. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2007, 90, 2397–2402. [Google Scholar]
  40. Steffen, A.; Rotter, N.; Konig, I.R.; Wollenberg, B. Botulinum toxin for Frey’s syndrome: A closer look at different treatment responses. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2012, 126, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shilpa, P.S.; Kaul, R.; Sultana, N.; Bhat, S. Botulinum toxin: The Midas touch. J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. 2014, 5, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Blitzer, A.; Gallagher, C.J. Pharmacology of botulinum neurotoxins. In Botulinum Neurotoxin for Head and Neck Disorders; Blitzer, A., Benson, B.E., Guss, J., Eds.; Thieme: New York, NY, USA; Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tintner, R.; Jankovic, J. Botulinum toxin type A in the management of oromandibular dystonia and bruxism. In Scientific and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum Toxin; Brin, M.F., Hallett, M., Jankovic, J., Tintner, R., Jankovic, J., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  44. Song, P.C.; Schwartz, J.; Blitzer, A. The emerging role of botulinum toxin in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Oral Dis. 2007, 13, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brodsky, M.A.; Swope, D.M.; Grimes, D. Diffusion of botulinum toxins. Tremor Other Hyperkinet. Mov. (NY) 2012, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bentsianov, B.; Francis, A.; Blitzer, A. Botulinum toxin treatment of temporomandibular disorders, masseteric hypertrophy, and cosmetic masseter reduction. Oper. Tech. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2004, 15, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. D’Elia, J.B.; Blitzer, A. Temporomandibular disorders, masseteric hypertrophy, and cosmetic masseter reduction. In Botulinum Neurotoxin for Head and Neck Disorders; Blitzer, A., Benson, B.E., Guss, J., Eds.; Thieme: New York, NY, USA; Stuttgart, Germany, 2012; pp. 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mathew, N.T.; Kaup, A.O. The use of botulinum toxin type A in headache treatment. Curr. Treat. Opt. Neurol. 2002, 4, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nixdorf, D.R.; Heo, G.; Major, P.W. Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin A for chronic myogenous orofacial pain. Pain 2002, 99, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Polo, M. Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of excessive gingival display. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2005, 127, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Freund, B.; Schwartz, M.; Symington, J.M. Botulinum toxin: New treatment for temporomandibular disorders. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2000, 38, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Silberstein, S.D.; Gobel, H.; Jensen, R.; Elkind, A.H.; Degryse, R.; Walcott, J.M.; Turkel, C. Botulinum toxin type A in the prophylactic treatment of chronic tension-type headache: A multicentre, double-Blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Cephalalgia 2006, 26, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxins EISSN 2072-6651 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top