Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Scolopendra subspinipes: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Its Bioactive Compounds, Preclinical Pharmacology, and Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Mycotoxin Contamination in Serbian Maize During 2021–2023: Climatic Influences and Implications for Food and Feed Safety
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deciphering the Neurotoxic Effects of Karenia selliformis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/toxins17050228
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Toxin Accumulation, Distribution, and Sources of Toxic Xanthid Crabs

by
Yuchengmin Zhang
1,2,*,†,
Hongchen Zhu
3,†,
Tomohiro Takatani
4 and
Osamu Arakawa
4
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresources and Environment/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China
2
Co-Innovation Center of Jiangsu Marine Bio-Industry Technology, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China
3
Graduate School of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
4
Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxins 2025, 17(5), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050228
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 29 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 May 2025 / Published: 5 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Biotoxins: Bioactivities, Identification, and Potential Bioprocesses)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Several species of crabs from the Xanthidae family are recognized as dangerous marine organisms due to their potent neurotoxins, including paralytic shellfish toxin (PST), tetrodotoxin (TTX), and palytoxin (PLTX). However, the mechanisms of toxin accumulation and transport and the origin of these toxins in toxic xanthid crabs remain unknown. The identification of toxic crab species, their toxicity and toxin composition, and toxin profiles have been studied thus far. To date, more than ten species of xanthid crabs have been confirmed to possess toxins. Recently, several new studies on crabs, including the geographic distribution of toxin profiles and the ecological role of crabs, have been reported. Therefore, this review provides a summary of global research on toxic xanthid crabs, containing new findings and hypotheses on the toxification in and the origins of these crabs. Furthermore, the challenges and future perspectives in this field are also discussed.
Keywords:
toxic xanthid crabs; tetrodotoxin; paralytic shellfish toxins; palytoxin; geographic distribution; origin
Key Contribution: This review summarized the investigation research of the toxin accumulation, geographic distribution, and potential origin organisms of toxic xanthid crabs and discussed the challenges and future perspectives in this field.

1. Introduction

Xanthid crabs, belonging to the Xanthidae family, are a diverse group of marine crustaceans that are known for their vibrant coloration and their significant role in coastal ecosystems. Various incidents caused by toxic xanthid crabs have been reported in several parts of the world over the years [1,2]. Research on toxic xanthid crabs began in the 1960s in Japan, followed by screening studies in Australia, Taiwan, Vietnam, and the Philippines, where the toxicity and toxin components of these crabs were identified [3,4,5,6,7,8]. The screening studies were firstly identified by mouse bioassay (MBA). Recently, with the development in detection equipment and methods, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have become commonly used analytical tools [9]. Furthermore, other detection methods have also been applied to the detection of biotoxins, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), biosensors, and flow injection microfluidic immunoassay systems (FI-IA system) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
The most well-known toxic xanthid crab species are Atergatis floridus and Zosimus aeneus, which have extremely high toxicity, and their toxin profiles from different regions showed the presence of paralytic shellfish toxin (PST) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) [18,19]. Furthermore, in 1986–1999, several xanthid crabs were found to possess palytoxin (PLTX) and/or palytoxin-like toxins [20]. Due to the individual and geographic differences in toxin contents and profiles reported by many studies [9], these toxins are considered to have an exogenous origin. However, to date, the mechanism of toxification, including toxin accumulation, transport, and metabolism, in toxic xanthid crabs is not yet fully understood. This review aims to summarize the previous studies on the toxin profiles and distribution of toxic xanthid crabs, along with recent findings on potential source organisms and their ecological roles.

2. Xanthid Crabs

Xanthid crabs of the Xanthidae family comprise 12 subfamilies, 53 genera, and more than 600 species, and are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical coastal regions and intertidal areas such as the Indo-Pacific, Mediterranean, and Atlantic regions [21]. Recent studies have identified several new species within this family, indicating that they are a large group of crustaceans [22,23,24]. Their hard exoskeleton can protect them from predators, while their strong claws can be used for foraging and defense against threats. Similar to other crabs, they are usually omnivores, with a diverse diet that includes algae, sponges, mollusks, and ascidians [25]. The reproductive cycle of xanthid crabs is generally seasonal, the female species can produce thousands of eggs, and the eggs may develop into planktonic larvae [26]. As they grow older, their life cycle always involves molting, just like other crustaceans, to change the old carapace to a new one [26,27,28]. Although most xanthid crabs are non-toxic, several species within the Xanthidae family have shown confirmed toxicity on screening. Most toxic crabs are easily identified by their rounded and hard carapace with colorful patterns or lines, which are commonly used as a danger signal to warn predators of their toxicity [29]. Interestingly, the old carapaces are non-toxic even in toxic species [2].

2.1. First Three Species Identified as Toxic

A previous Japanese study conducted in the 1960s investigated approximately 1000 crab specimens from 72 species belonging to 8 families and found that 3 species belonging to the Xanthidae family, Z. aeneus, A. floridus, and Platypodia granulosa, were toxic [3].

2.1.1. Zosimus aeneus

Z. aeneus was first described in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae, published by Carl Linnaeus in 1758 [30], commonly known as the “devil crab.” It is a well-known species known for its bright colors and beautiful patterns. Its carapace, claws, and legs exhibit a unique pattern of red, purple, or deep blue patches on a pale brown or cream-colored surface, and usually, its abdomen is cream-colored (Figure 1A). Its carapace has deep grooves, while the tips of its walking legs are characterized by a small fuzz [30]. Z. aeneus can reach a size of 6–9 cm and is the largest species among the three toxic crabs (Z. aeneus, A. floridus, and P. granulosa). This species inhabits live coral reefs across the Indo-Pacific region, with its distribution spanning from the Red Sea to the Ryukyu Islands and Hawaii. Z. aeneus is considered a critical species for toxicity research and has been involved in several human poisoning incidents.

2.1.2. Atergatis floridus

A. floridus is distinguished by its smooth surface and round carapace. It is called “sube-sube-manju” in Japan because the shape of its carapace is like a smooth steamed bun. It has a unique greenish-to-greenish-blue–brown color or a dark-brown color, with a lace-like pattern of white or yellow lines (Figure 1B). These unique characteristics make it different from other crab species [31,32]. A. floridus is distributed more widely than Z. aeneus. Usually, it is found in tropical reef ecosystems and along rocky shores of the Indian Ocean, the Western Pacific region, and the southern coast of Taiwan. A. floridus, found in many regions, contains extremely high levels of toxins like Z. aeneus.
Table 1. Summary of the identification of toxic xanthid crabs.
Table 1. Summary of the identification of toxic xanthid crabs.
SpeciesToxic Specimens/Tested SpecimensToxin ProfilesToxin ContentsMethods of DeterminationLocationReference
Zosimus aeneus81/112——NMMBA3Ryukyu and Amami Islands, Japan[3]
77/107——ND-1580 MU/gMBAKyonoura, Amami-Oshima Island, Ishigaki Island, and Tokunoshima Island, Japan[4]
24/24——30–1260 MU/gMBAIshigaki Island, Japan[5]
5/28——ND-30 MU/gMBAMarcus Island, Japan
0/38——NDMBAEspiritu Santo, the Republic of Vanuatu
0/2——NDMBAAmerican Samoa
9/9——30–260 MU/gMBARangiroa, Tuamotu Island
101/102——ND-16500 MU/gMBAIshigaki Island, Japan[33]
6/6——2–220 MU/gMBAHachijo Island and Bonin Islands, Japan
11/11——26–3000 MU/gMBACebu Island, the Philippines
18/18PST2.2–33.8 MU/gMBA, TLCFiji Island, Fiji[34]
50/69PST and/or TTXND-259 MU/gMBA, HPLCNegros Island, the Philippines[35]
53/75PST and/or TTXND-2300 MUMBA, HPLCLanyu, Wanlitung, and Hsiaoliuchiu, Taiwan[7]
14/15PST and/or TTXND-1258 MUMBA, HPLC, LC-MS, GC-MSKenting National Park, Taiwan[36]
9/16TTXND-11 MU/gMBA, HPLC, LC-MSTokara Islands, Japan[37]
52/53PST and/or TTXND-14700 MU/g (appendages)HPLC, LC-MSIshigaki Island, Japan[9]
Atergatis floridus102/144——NMMBARyukyu Islands, Amami Islands, and the mainland of Japan, Japan[3]
66/96——NMMBANagasaki, Kaimon, Tosa, Minabe, Nagai, Awa-Shirahama, Hachijo Island, and Oshima Island, Japan[4]
35/35PST3.4–717 MU/gMBA, TLCFiji Island, Fiji[34]
19/21PST and/or TTXND-1300 MU/gMBA, TLC, HPLCIshigaki Island, Japan[38]
25/25PST2.3–480 MU/gMBA, HPLCNegros Island, the Philippines[35]
65/109PSTND-108 MU/gMBA, TLCThe Great Barrier Reef, Australia[8]
8/8PST and/or TTX63–424 MUMBA, TLC, HPLCKeelung, Taiwan[39]
32/32TTX3–237 MU/g (muscle of cheliped)MBAKanagawa and Wakayama, Japan[40]
15/15PST and/or TTX88 ± 40–1257 ± 607 MU/g (appendages Av. ± S.D.)MBA, HPLC, GC-MSIshigaki Island, Japan[41]
5/5PST and/or TTX221 ± 189 MU/g (appendages Av. ± S.D.)MBA, HPLC, GC-MSCebu, the Philippines[41]
9/9TTX2.73–206.64 MU/gMBA, HPLC, GC-MSNagasaki, Japan[42]
15/15TTX0.21–116.1 MU/g (appendages)MBA, HPLC, GC-MSNagasaki, Japan[42]
Lophozozymus pictor4/4PLTX200–10,000 MU/g (viscera)
180–3000 MU/g (gill)		TLC, HPLC, FAB-MSNegros Island, the Philippines[43]
——PLTX5000 MU/g (extract)MBA, TLC, HPLCSentosa Island, Singapore[44]
21/21——7840 ± 2254 MU/g (gut Av. ± S.D.)MBASentosa Island, Singapore[45]
15/15PST386–3874 MUMBA, TLC, HPLCKeelung, Taiwan[46]
Platypodia granulosa12/38——NMMBARyukyu Islands, Japan[3]
11/35——NMMBAMiyako Island, and Ryukyu Islands, Japan[4]
Atergatopsis germaini17/17PST472–9045 MUMBA, TLC, HPLCKeelung, Taiwan[47]
Atergatis integerrimus1/4TTXND-2 MU/gMBANegros Island, the Philippines[35]
Actaeodes tomentosus7/15TTXND-40 MUMBA, HPLC, LC-MS, GC-MSKenting National Park, Taiwan[36]
Carpilius maculatus1/2——ND-2 MU/gMBANegros Island, the Philippines[35]
Etisus rhynchophorus1/2——ND-2 MU/gMBANegros Island, the Philippines[35]
Etisus splendidus1/4——ND-2 MU/gMBANegros Island, the Philippines[35]
Eriphia sebana35/75PSTND-9 MU/gMBA, TLCThe Great Barrier Reef, Australia[48]
Demania reynaudi7/7PST and/or TTX217–564 MUMBA, TLC, HPLCKeelung, Taiwan[39]
1/1PLTX-like toxin800 MU (two legs)MBA, HPLCNegros Island, the Philippines[49]
Demania cultripes7/7PST and/or TTX5.6–52.1 MU/g (viscera)MBA, HPLC, GC-MSCebu Island, the Philippines[50]
Demania alcalai2/2PLTX4000–5400 (viscera)
2400–16,000 (gill)		TLC, HPLC, FAB-MSNegros Island, the Philippines[43]
Leptodius sanguirreus3/3——0.3–1.3 MU/gMBAHeron Island, Australia[51]
Pilodius areolatus4/10——1.5 MU/g (extract)MBAHeron Island, Australia[51]
Phymodius angolalos6/9——1.6–8.9 MU/g (three extracts)MBAHeron Island, Australia[51]
Platypodiella spectabilis3/3PLTX20–50 HU/gHemolysis, HPLC Santa Marta, Colombia[52,53]
Xanthias lividu9/9PST and/or TTX118–430 MUMBA, HPLCLanyu and Hsiaoliuchiu, Taiwan[54]
5/5PST and/or TTX11–118 MUMBA, HPLC, LC-MS, GC-MSKenting National Park, Taiwan[36]
——: No toxins were detected or mentioned. NM: not mentioned. MU: mouse unit. ND: not detected. MBA: mouse bioassay. HU: hemolytic unit.

2.1.3. Platypodia granulosa

P. granulosa is one of the few poisonous species with a body width ranging from 4 to 6 cm. P. granulosa displays a subdued chocolate-brown coloration on both its body and its claws, with a pair of red eyes distinguishing it from other colored xanthid species (Figure 1C). Its carapace is covered with large, rounded bumps, giving it a distinctive texture. The sides of the body are smooth with regular notches, often highlighted by pale bars, making the crabs seem like a pie [55,56].

2.2. Species Subsequently Identified as Toxic

Following this study, the screening of toxic crabs was continued in Japan and was also conducted in the Philippines, Australia, Taiwan, and other parts of the world [35,51,57]. The findings from these studies indicated that several species of xanthid crabs all over the world are considered to be toxic, and they are summarized in Table 1. With the toxin incidents and the investigations of toxic crabs in various countries and regions, over 10 species of the Xanthidae family have been reported in the past half-decade. Toxic species identified during this period include Lophozozymus pictor, Atergatopsis germaini, and Xanthia lividus in Taiwan and Australia [46,51]; Demania species such as Demania reynaudi in the Philippines and Taiwan [39,49]; and Demania cultripes and Demania alcalai in Vietnam and the Philippines [43,50]. In Australia, more types of toxic xanthid crabs were identified in 1988; although their toxin profiles cannot be confirmed and their toxicities are low, these species of xanthid crabs can also be dangerous [51]. From 2008 to 2009, a screening study of marine Brachyuran crabs in Indian waters investigated a total of 990 species belonging to 281 genera and 36 families. Among these, eight families were found to have toxic species. Notably, the majority of the toxic crabs identified belong to the Xanthidae family [29,56]. A brief introduction of P. granulosa, L. pictor, and Demania species is presented below.

2.2.1. Lophozozymus pictor

L. pictor is another famous toxic xanthid crab. This species has an 8–10 cm body width and has special colors and grooves on its carapace. It is mostly red in color, with several white mosaic and black spots on the tip of its claws [45,58].

2.2.2. Demania Species

Demania is a genus of crabs from the Xanthidae family, commonly found in the intertidal zone. Several species within this genus are known to contain toxins. Their carapace width usually reaches about 50 mm and has characteristic patterns. Moreover, their carapaces are striking, exhibiting mainly brown color with some colorful features, such as maroon, orange, beige, and white markings. Almost all of the legs have orange and white bands or lines [59].

3. Toxin Profiles and Contents in Toxic Crabs

The investigations of toxic xanthid crabs from around the world have found that they usually contain PSTs and TTX along with their analogs [19,60,61]. In addition, some studies have indicated that they can also accumulate PLTXs and PLTX-like toxins [62]. PSTs and TTX are close in molecular weight, lethal to humans, and cause muscle paralysis by specifically blocking voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels, while PLTXs and PLTX-like toxins can block the Na+/K+-ATPase channel [63]. Table 1 shows the toxin investigations of toxic xanthid crabs summarized in this review from 1969 to 2023.

3.1. Paralytic Shellfish Toxins (PSTs)

PSTs are a group of neurotoxins produced by toxic dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria and are involved in the toxification of bivalves [64]. Around 1964, a paralytic shellfish toxin from Saxidomus giganteus was named saxitoxin, and its structure was determined by Schantz et al. in 1975 [65]. It has a trialkyl tetrahydropurine as its basic structure, featuring a 3,4-propino-perhydropurine tricyclic system. NH2 groups at positions 2 and 8 of the purine ring form two stable guanidinium moieties, contributing to its high polarity and hydrophilicity [65]. In addition, many different organisms have been found to possess PSTs, including frogs, ascidians, pufferfish, and crabs [66,67]. The PST chemical structures were deciphered using an X-ray diffraction analysis in 1975. To date, more than 50 analogs of PSTs have been identified [68]. Figure 2 shows the PST analogs usually detected in the toxic crabs. They are commonly classified into gonyautoxin groups (GTXs), including GTX 1–4 and dcGTX2, 3, and saxitoxin groups (STXs), including STX, neoSTX, dcSTX, and dcneoSTX. Two specific PST analogs, carbamoyl-N-hydroxysaxitoxin (hySTX) and carbamoyl-N-hydroxyneosaxitoxin (hyneoSTX), were first isolated from xanthid crabs and have not yet been detected in other organisms [69]. In addition, another specific analog, 11-saxitoxinethanoic acid (SEA), has been reported to be identified in A. floridus living on the Pacific coast of Shikoku Island [70]. This STX analogue is unique for its carbon–carbon bond at the C11 position (Figure 2). Different analogs have different toxicities. Commonly, the most toxic component is STX, followed by neosaxitoxin (neoSTX) and gonyautoxins 1 and 3 (GTX 1 and 3) [71]. Moreover, the transformation of GTXs in toxic crabs has been reported. Kotaki et al. [72] isolated two PST-transforming bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. and Vibrio sp., in A. floridus that can transform GTX2, 3 into STX. Arakawa et al. [73] demonstrated that A. floridus can accumulate GTXs with external exposure by converting them into STXs. In this study, 27 crab specimens were divided into nine groups. Four groups received injections of a GTX mixture. The remaining four groups were fed a toxic diet once daily for 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. The results showed that A. floridus quickly converted GTXs into STXs under both the injection and feeding conditions. Recently, Zhang et al. [9] investigated the toxin profiles of Z. aeneus by analyzing both its appendages and its stomach contents. Their findings revealed that, while the stomach contents contained lower toxin concentrations compared to the appendages, the composition of PSTs in the stomach differed significantly. GTXs were predominant in many stomach contents of this specimen. Thus, the authors hypothesized that xanthid crabs may ingest GTX-dominated toxins through their toxic prey and change these toxins into STXs for accumulation within their tissues. Although PST-transforming enzymes have been identified in various organisms, the mechanisms of PST transformation in toxic crabs remain unclear [74].

3.2. Tetrodotoxin (TTX)

TTX is known as a potent neurotoxin that was first identified in pufferfish [75,76,77]. Subsequently, TTX and TTX analogs have been identified in various organisms such as octopus [78], newt [79], frog [80], and crab [19]. TTX is a crystalline compound that consists of a guanidinium moiety attached to a highly oxygenated carbon skeleton, which contains a 2,4-dioxaadamantane fragment with five hydroxyl groups [81]. To date, approximately 30 analogs of TTX have been identified in both marine and terrestrial animals. Some of these analogs exhibit significant toxicity, especially 11-oxoTTX, which is known to be as toxic as or even more toxic than TTX [82]. Figure 3 shows the TTX and TTX analogs commonly detected in toxic xanthid crabs. They are usually distinguished by differences in the structures of R3 and R4, except for 4-epiTTX, whose R1 and R2 structures differ from those of TTX. In addition, TTX, 4-epiTTX, and 4,9-anhydroTTX are usually found together due to the chemical equilibrium that exists among them [83]. 11-oxoTTX and 11-norTTX-6(R)-ol were identified from A. floridus, and 11-oxoTTX was present in almost the same amount as TTX, indicating that oxidation might be more advanced in A. floridus than in other TTX-bearing animals [61]. In contrast, 11-oxoTTX, deoxyTTX, 4-epiTTX, and 4,9-anhydroTTX have been isolated in Z. aeneus on Yoshihara Reef, Ishigaki Island [9], and 11-norTTX-6(S)-ol has been identified in A. floridus from Nagasaki [42].

3.3. Palytoxins (PLTXs) and PLTX-like Compounds

Although most toxic xanthid crabs are known to possess TTX and PSTs, a different toxin was identified in three species of xanthid crabs on Negros Island, the Philippines, from 1986 to 1988. The species D. alcalai, L. pictor, and D. reynaudii were found to contain PLTXs and/or PLTX-like compounds [43,49]. In one reported case, a victim experienced restlessness, muscle cramps, and vomiting after eating about a quarter of a crab and died the next day. The toxin responsible was identified as PLTXs and PLTX-like compounds, which are known to be one of the most potent marine toxins. Subsequent studies also confirmed the presence of PLTXs in L. pictor from Singapore. Furthermore, PLTXs were also identified in the xanthid crab Platypodiella spectabilis from Colombia [52].
PLTXs is a group with high-molecular-weight components with complex structures, and their molecular weight is approximately 2680 (Figure 4). PLTXs were first isolated from the zoanthid Palythoa toxica in Hawaii [84]. Similar to TTX and PSTs, various marine organisms contain PLTXs and/or PLTX-like compounds such as dinoflagellate [85], shellfish [86], and parrotfish [87]. To date, several analogs of PLTXs and four groups of PLTX-like compounds with approximately 20 components have been identified [20]. A 42-hydroxy-PLTX analog is frequently mentioned, which has been isolated in several PLTX-containing organisms, but other analogs have been studied little because of their complex structures [88,89]. PLTXs can cause severe physiological reactions in humans, including cardiovascular and neurological symptoms, often leading to a threat to life [62,90].

4. Toxin Distribution in the Anatomy of Toxic Crabs

TTX, PST, and PLTXs accumulate in the whole body of crabs, including appendages, the carapace, and the viscera [4,43]. However, the toxicity of the toxic crabs varies from site to site. Hashimoto et al. reported that the appendages are usually more toxic than other parts of the body in toxic crabs [8,41], and subsequent studies have shown that the muscles of the chelipeds and the viscera were always more toxic than other parts in almost all toxic crabs, regardless of PST and TTX concentrations [50,91]. Although there have been far fewer reports on xanthid crabs containing PLTXs than those containing PSTs or TTX, two PLTX-containing crabs reported by Yasumoto et al. exhibited the highest toxicity in their gills, viscera, and eggs [43].

5. Geographic Distribution and Individual Variations in Toxins in Toxic Xanthid Crabs

Understanding the geographic distribution and individual variations in toxin content and profiles among toxic xanthid crabs is essential for investigating the toxification mechanisms in toxic crabs and searching for their origins. The toxicity and specific toxin profiles of these crabs exhibit significant variability, influenced by species and habitat, even within small geographic regions [9].

5.1. Local and Individual Variations in Toxic Xanthid Crabs

Extensive research on the toxicity of xanthid crabs across various countries and regions has been reported. A total of 119 specimens of Z. aeneus collected from Ishigaki Island and Hachijo Island in Japan, and from Bonin Island and Cebu Island in the Philippines, were analyzed. The results showed no significant differences in toxicity between sexes or years, although a notable individual variation in toxicity was observed [33]. On the other hand, A. floridus exhibited notable variability in toxicity, which appeared to be influenced by both geographic location and the season of collection in Australia [8,51]. In Taiwan, lower toxicity levels of A. floridus were reported [39]. For toxin profiles, Z. aeneus, A. floridus, and P. granulosa, which inhabit the Ryukyu and Amami Islands of Japan, the Philippines, and Australia, displayed high levels of PSTs in their toxin profiles [33,35,51]. In contrast, specimens from the Tokara Islands, the Pacific coast of mainland Japan, Taiwan, and Cebu Island in the Philippines exhibited relatively lower toxicity levels, with TTX being the predominant toxin component [3,5,35,41,57]. These findings suggested that the toxicity and toxin profiles of xanthid crabs are susceptible to differences in prey species due to complex environmental factors, resulting in geographic diversity.

5.2. Small-Scale Distribution of Toxin Profiles and Toxin Concentrations

Significant variations in the toxicity and toxin composition of crabs within a small area have been found on Ishigaki Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Previous studies suggested that the PST composition of A. floridus has been reported to differ between two reefs separated by a passage (Sites A and B, Figure 5) and also between Site B and Kojima, a small islet immediately adjacent to the strait. A. floridus on Kojima islet was found to be TTX-dominant [10,33]. Recently, an examination of 53 Z. aeneus specimens, with GPS coordinates recorded for each one on a single reef in 2018 and 2019, revealed three distinct toxin distribution zones within this reef (Figure 5). In the northwestern zone (NW), many individuals accumulated exceptionally high concentrations of PSTs, while in the central zone (CTR), most specimens contained small amounts of TTX, with few PSTs. In contrast, the southeastern zone (SE) exhibited individuals with intermediate toxin characteristics. These findings provide important evidence that xanthid crabs do not produce their own toxins but rather ingest them from their prey or environment, even within small areas.

6. Human Interactions and Risks

Both TTX and PST remain highly potent even after cooking, making the consumption of xanthid crabs extremely dangerous. Furthermore, PLTX and PLTX-like compounds are potent toxins even at low concentrations [84]. These toxic crabs are easily considered toxic due to their unique patterns, but they coexist in coastal regions inhabited by edible crab species and are therefore at a high risk of accidental ingestion by humans. In some regions, especially in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands, these crabs are sometimes caught and consumed mistakenly [91], and several food poisoning incidents due to xanthid crab consumption have been reported [43,92,93].
The clinical symptoms from TTX and PSTs are similar and vary somewhat based on the ingestion amount. The symptoms include numbness, tingling in the limbs, gastrointestinal discomfort, muscle weakness or paralysis, and, in some cases, respiratory failure and death. These neurotoxins block Nav channels, damaging neurological function and leading to serious consequences if no emergency treatment is available. However, there is currently no antidote available for either TTX or PSTs. Thus, the treatment mainly involves assisted respiration and gastric lavage until the toxins are naturally eliminated from the body [68,81]. On the other hand, PLTXs and PLTX-like toxins act by blocking the Na+/K+-ATPase channel [63]. When PLTXs and PLTX-like compounds are ingested, the most common symptom in humans is rhabdomyolysis [90], including muscle pain and generalized weakness, with additional nonspecific signs such as fever, nausea, and vomiting.
Over 20 cases of xanthid crab poisoning have been reported since the 1960s, with many cases occurring in the Ryukyu and Amami Islands of Japan [1], while other cases caused by toxic xanthid crabs have been reported across various countries and regions, including instances of PLTX poisoning [34,49,93,94,95,96,97]. These cases represent the importance of monitoring the marine environments and public health education where toxic xanthid crabs are found, in order to prevent further poisoning cases. Several old cases are described in previous studies [2,3,91]. A new intoxication incident caused by toxic xanthid crab D. reynaudii was first recorded in Vietnam [93].
In March 2021, a significant case of human poisoning linked to crab consumption was reported in Tinh Gia District, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Two crab specimens, later identified as D. reynaudii, were involved in the incident. D. reynaudii, a toxic xanthid crab, had not been previously considered toxic in Vietnam. Later, a toxicity analysis using a mouse bioassay revealed high toxin levels in the soft tissue (175 and 195 MU/g), indicating that the crabs were unsuitable for human consumption. A further chemical analysis detected no PSTs or PLTXs but did detect TTX and its two analogs, anhydroTTX and 4-epiTTX, highlighting the first evidence of TTX detection in D. reynaudii in Vietnam. This case highlights the importance of marine monitoring and public health education. Early identification of contaminated toxic species and raising awareness among fishers, vendors, and consumers about the risks associated with toxic cabs are needed. Public health campaigns can focus on identifying toxic species and recognizing early symptoms of poisoning to ensure that poisoning incidents do not occur again.

7. Hypotheses on the Origins of Toxin-Producing Organisms in Toxic Crabs

Several toxins are produced by microorganisms and are subsequently transported through the food chain to various organisms [87,98,99,100]. For example, although marine pufferfish are widely recognized as TTX-containing organisms, no TTX was detected in their bodies when cultured in clean seawater and fed a TTX-free diet [99,101]. On the other hand, PSTs are well-known toxins produced by specific microorganisms in both seawater and freshwater environments [68]. Therefore, bivalve aquaculture operations, which are particularly susceptible to PST accumulation, should be located away from areas prone to harmful algal blooms (HABs). PLTXs and PLTX-like compounds could be produced by dinoflagellates, and some recent reports have suggested that bacteria or cyanobacteria are involved in PLTX accumulation [52,102,103]. In toxic crabs, the variations in toxin profiles and concentrations even within a single reef suggest that toxins in these crabs are acquired through their diet. Unlike filter-feeding bivalves, which primarily consume plankton and easily accumulate toxins [104], xanthid crabs are omnivores feeding on a wide range of items, from sediments to fish remains. Thus, they may acquire toxins through the complex food web, making it difficult to trace the origins of these toxins [105]. Some common origin organisms of toxins or hypotheses of the origins of toxins in toxic crabs are summarized below.

7.1. Red Algae Jania sp.

The red algae Jania sp. is a type of red macroalgae, or seaweed, belonging to the family Corallinaceae and is characterized by its hard, calcareous, branching skeleton.
Saisho et al. [17] analyzed three species of xanthid crabs: Z. aeneus, A. floridus, and D. perlata. While D. perlata was initially regarded as non-toxic, unpublished data from Daigo in 1987 suggested it could possess weak toxicity [97]. The stomach content analysis of Z. aeneus specimens from Ishigaki Island revealed a diverse diet, including a green alga (Codium sp.), a brown alga (Ectocarpus sp.), and various red algae (Jania sp., Polysiphonia sp., Galaxaura sp., and Hypnea sp.), as well as poriferans, corals, bivalves, gastropods, and sand. Among these, Jania sp., Hypnea sp., corals, and sand were predominant in specimens collected in June 1979.
For A. floridus, a stomach content analysis from 1979 revealed a diet consisting of Hypnea sp., sand, shells, animal tissues, poriferans, and fish fragments. By 1980, it was found that the diet also comprised Codium sp., Ectocarpus sp., Jania sp., Galaxaura sp., Hypnea sp., annelids, animal tissues, corals, and sand in specimens collected on Ishigaki Island. Similarly, the weakly toxic D. perlata showed a comparable diet, with Jania sp., Hypnea sp., Ectocarpus sp., and corals as dominant components.
In 1979, Jania sp. was identified as containing GTX-group toxins, and TTX was detected in 1986 [98,99]. These findings led researchers to propose that Jania sp. could be a possible source of crab intoxication. However, the detected toxin concentrations in Jania sp. were relatively low (ppb level of anhydroTTX and a maximum of 1.5 MU/g for GTX1-3), insufficient to account for the high toxin levels observed in toxic xanthid crabs. Additionally, Jania sp. was absent from the stomach contents of A. floridus in 1979 and Z. aeneus in 2019 [12], but was found to dominate the stomach contents of the weakly toxic D. perlata specimens. Therefore, Jania sp. cannot be definitively identified as the primary origin of these toxins.

7.2. Ascidians

As described in Section 5.2 on the small-scale distribution of toxin profiles and toxin concentrations, the stomach contents of xanthid crabs were also examined in 2019.
In 2019, three crabs were collected from each of the PST-rich and PST-poor zones for microscopic observation and toxin analysis. After cleaning, a large number of ascidian spicules were observed in both zones, i.e., 1263 in the PST-rich zone and 1676 in the PST-poor zone, along with small quantities of foraminifers, sponge spicules, algae, and mollusk fragments. These findings contradict those of Saisho, who reported a minimal presence of other organisms besides ascidian spicules [25]. Due to the many shapes of spicules in morphologies, it is difficult to identify ascidian species only by spicules. However, the four types of ascidian spicules detected in the stomach contents of Z. aeneus could be classified into two genera, Lissoclinum sp. and Trididemnum sp., based on the previous reports [106,107,108]. It is worth noting that some ascidian species have been reported to be toxic and contain PSTs and/or TTX [67,109]. The toxin analysis of stomach contents suggested that the GTX group was detected in the stomach contents of crabs collected from the PST-rich zone, where Lissoclinum ascidian spicules were predominant; on the contrary, only a few Lissoclinum ascidian spicules were found, and no PSTs were detected in the stomach contents of crabs from the PST-poor zone. The authors also analyzed both the stomach contents and the toxin concentrations in all 25 specimens. The results show that, in many individuals, the GTX group was predominant in the stomach contents. Based on the GTX transformation results, the authors suggested that xanthid crabs ingest the GTX group from toxic prey and convert it to the STX group after accumulation. These results suggest that Lissoclinum ascidians may be a source of PSTs. This finding provides the second alternate toxin origin, after red algae Jania sp. in 1983 [110]. However, no live ascidian specimens have been collected; thus, conclusive evidence on two ascidian genera containing TTX and/or PSTs remains absent. Further studies focusing on the collection of live ascidians and the toxin analysis and stomach analysis of toxic crabs in other regions are necessary in the future.

7.3. Zoanthid Genus Palythoa

Palythoa is a typical genus containing PLTXs and is considered one of the original sources of PLTXs in marine ecosystems. Previous studies on investigating the toxin profiles of several marine organisms collected near Zoanthid (genus Palythoa) habitats have detected PLTXs, including in xanthid crabs and other soft coral species [20,98]. However, Yasumoto et al. were unable to detect any zoanthids in the stomach contents of the PLTX-containing crabs they investigated, thus not providing clarity on the source of PLTXs in xanthid crabs [43]. In addition, it seems that PLTXs in the genus Palythoa and another zoanthid coelenterate, Zoanthus, are not produced by the organisms themselves. The natural bioaccumulation of PLTXs in these species via the food web is still unknown [20,111].

7.4. Microorganisms

Microorganisms that produce toxins, such as bacteria, dinoflagellates, and cyanobacteria, are found globally [112,113,114]. In 1986, Noguchi et al. [115] isolated Vibrio sp. bacteria from the intestine of A. floridus, identifying TTX and anhydroTTX in cellular extracts and culture medium by using instrumental analysis. This marked the first identification of a TTX-producing bacterial strain as the symbiotic microflora within a TTX-bearing organism. Since then, TTX-producing bacteria have been isolated from various TTX-bearing organisms, such as the red algae Jania sp. [116] and the horseshoe crab Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda [117]. In 1990, Kogure et al. [118] reported significant concentrations of TTX in marine sediments, providing a new perspective on free TTX-producing bacteria as the origin organism. To date, approximately 50 TTX-producing bacterial strains have been isolated from deep-sea sediments or freshwater sediments. In addition, more than 150 TTX-producing bacterial strains have been identified, most belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria and class Gammaproteobacteria [112]. Some researchers suggest that free-living TTX-producing bacteria, rather than symbiotic ones, may be the origin source of TTX [119,120,121]. These free-living bacteria may be transferred through food chains, contributing to the presence of TTX in various organisms. However, this hypothesis is currently difficult to verify due to the challenges in culturing TTX-producing bacteria under laboratory conditions and the low concentration of TTX produced by symbiotic bacteria. Several researchers point out that the bacteria will lose TTX production ability after culture in the laboratory [112]. Further investigation on the optimal conditions and external factors for growth is needed, or other methods to detect the symbiotic bacteria, such as immunoelectron and immunofluorescent microscopies and high-throughput sequencing techniques [122,123].
PSTs are known to be produced by toxic dinoflagellates, such as the genera Alexandrium and Gymnodinium, in marine environments, and by cyanobacteria, such as the genus Anabaena, in freshwater [68]. On the other hand, dinoflagellates of the genus Ostreopsis, bacteria, and cyanobacteria also have been considered to be the origin organisms of PLTXs [102,103,111,124]. However, crabs are not plankton feeders, the lack of evidence of red tides caused by PST-producing dinoflagellates in the habitats of toxic xanthid crabs reveals that the accumulation of PSTs directly via dinoflagellates seems unlikely [2], and no microflora involved in palytoxin production has been reported from toxic xanthid crabs. Interestingly, certain cyanobacteria isolated from the tunic of ascidians may provide an alternative method of accumulating PSTs and PLTXs, given that ascidians have been identified as potential origin organisms. This hypothesis needs to be verified for further research [125,126].

8. Resistibility and Defenses of Toxic Crabs

TTX/PST-bearing organisms, such as toxic marine pufferfish [127], gobyfish Yongeichthys criniger [128], bivalves [129], and newts [130], show resistance to TTX or PSTs. In fact, toxic xanthid crabs also show extremely high resistance to both TTX and PSTs.
Several experiments have been reported on the resistance of toxic and non-toxic crabs [127,131,132]. The results suggested that A. floridus demonstrated approximately 500 times higher resistance to the STX group, while both A. floridus and Z. aeneus exhibited about 5000 times higher resistance to the GTX group and 500 times higher resistance to TTX compared to non-toxic crabs. Furthermore, Daigo et al. [133] investigated the stability of neurons in the response to TTX and PSTs. They examined the effects of various concentrations of PST/TTX solutions on the action potentials of neuron fibers of test crabs, including Z. aeneus, A. floridus, D. perlata, and some non-toxic crabs and lobsters. The results showed that toxic crabs Z. aeneus and A. floridus showed approximately 1000 times more resistance to TTX and PSTs than non-toxic crabs and lobsters. In addition, the weakly toxic crab D. perlata also demonstrated resistance to these toxins. Based on these findings, it can be suggested that toxic crabs, like other toxin-bearing organisms, have evolved resistance mechanisms to TTX and PSTs, enabling them to selectively accumulate these toxins. This ability may also play an important role, allowing the crabs to use these toxins as a defense mechanism against predators. In contrast, the resistance to the toxins of PLTX-containing organisms remains unclear. It is speculated that these organisms may exhibit resistance or tolerance to PLTXs, which could help them accumulate PLTXs and/or PLTX-like compounds more effectively [20].
The mechanism of TTX and PST resistance in toxic organisms entails the resistance of Nav channels to TTX/PSTs and TTX/PST-binding proteins [68,75]. In toxic organisms, mutations in the P-loop regions of the skeletal muscle Nav1.4 channels have been identified, which can reduce the binding affinity for TTX and/or PSTs. This phenomenon has been observed in marine organisms such as pufferfish and newts, which exhibit reduced sensitivity to TTX, as well as in bivalves, which show binding affinity for PSTs [68,134]. On the other hand, Yotsu-Yamashita et al. elucidated the primary structure and characteristics of the TTX-binding protein from the plasma of Takifugu pardalis and named it pufferfish saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin-binding protein (PSTBP) [135], and PST-binding proteins have also been identified from several marine organisms, including oysters [136], cockles [137], and shore crabs [138]. Llewellyn et al. [139] found a STX-binding factor in the hemolymph of several species of xanthid crabs, including toxic species such as L. pictor and A. tomentosus and non-toxic species such as Liomera tristis and Chlorodiella nigra. Interestingly, although there are no reports of purified TTX-binding protein obtained from toxic xanthid crabs, several kinds of TTX-neutralizing hemolymph proteins have been extracted from non-toxic shore crabs such as Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda and Hemigrapsus sanguineus, and their resistance to TTX is higher than that of other common organisms [138,140].
The above findings suggest that the high resistibility of toxic xanthid crabs enables them to accumulate higher concentrations of toxins compared to other organisms. This resistibility appears to involve mechanisms such as reducing the sensitivity of their nervous system to TTX and PSTs and utilizing a hemolymph factor that binds and neutralizes these toxins.

9. Ecological Role of Toxic Xanthid Crabs

It has been presumed that the toxic crabs use their toxins for defense [42]. Toxic crabs move slowly and seem to show little aggressiveness compared to other crabs, such as the “intermediate” toxic crab D. perlata, which is usually found on the same reef. They can be easily caught by hand, and they close their claws very slowly. However, studies have shown that toxic xanthid crabs can release their toxin when their carapace is mildly stimulated. The maximum amount of toxin released by toxic xanthid crabs ranges from 162 MU to 2635 MU for a total of 56 days, indicating that they use toxins to protect themselves rather than for physical defense [141].
Toxic xanthid crabs have been studied for over 60 years, and the potential toxin-origin organisms and their symbiotic relationships with bacteria have been discussed earlier in this review. However, only a few studies have reported their predators. Noguchi et al. [2] hypothesized that carnivorous octopuses, such as blue-ringed octopuses, may prey on toxic xanthid crabs. Blue-ringed octopuses are known to possess TTX in their posterior salivary glands [142]; however, no direct evidence is available that confirms that these toxic octopuses prey on toxic xanthid crabs, although indirect evidence was reported in 2023. Zhang et al. [42] reported similar TTX concentrations and profiles in A. floridus and blue-lined octopus Hapalochlaena cf. fasciata collected from the same location. This study represents the first report of toxic xanthid crabs and blue-lined octopuses collected from the same site at the same time, investigating the potential ecological relationship between these two toxic species. The results showed that, in the extraction of A. floridus, major components such as TTX and 11-norTTX-6(S)-ol, with 4-epiTTX, 11-deoxyTTX, and 4,9-anhydroTTX as minor components, were identified. This toxin profile is similar to the one from the posterior salivary glands of octopuses collected from the same site, especially the major component 11-norTTX-6(S)-ol. Based on these findings and the fact that octopuses are known to prey on crabs [143,144], the authors hypothesized that a predator–prey relationship may exist between these two organisms, at least in this region, where these two organisms were found together. Contrarily, octopuses from the genus Hapalochlaena possess a range of toxins that they use for both offense and defense [143,145,146]. Thus, the authors also hypothesized that these octopuses may attack xanthid crabs using other toxins, as the TTX resistance observed in A. floridus makes it difficult to paralyze them with TTX.

10. Discussion

Toxic xanthid crabs have been observed on coral reefs in tropical and subtropical coastal environments for over half a century. However, the origin of crab toxins and toxification mechanisms remain unknown. One of the difficulties in elucidating the toxification mechanism in toxic crabs is that few organisms have been found to be the source of crab toxins. Initially, only three species of xanthid crabs (Z. aeneus, A. floridus, and P. granulosa) were identified to be toxic in Japan [3]. Today, more than ten species are known to be toxic (Table 1), but Z. aeneus and A. floridus are still the most commonly studied species, accounting for 80% of all investigated specimens among toxic species, as shown in Figure 6, and over 70% of individuals of these species were found to be toxic.
There have been no reports of PLTX-containing xanthid crabs in recent years, but crabs containing TTXs and PSTs have been reported [42,93]. Global climate change associated with increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations and warmer water temperatures is thought to increase the abundance and promote the widespread distribution of TTX and PSTs in the marine environment [147]. This phenomenon may affect not only the presence of free TTX and PSTs but also the distribution of PST- and TTX-bearing organisms. PST-producing dinoflagellates are generally found at higher latitudes, and toxic xanthid crabs and octopuses have been collected in South Korea [148,149,150]. As the distribution of toxic prey changes or expands, non-toxic species with toxin resistance, such as D. perlata, a xanthid crab species, may become toxic. It is likely that crabs previously considered non-toxic and/or low-toxicity species could be transformed into toxic and/or highly toxic species. Similar risks exist for PLTX-bearing prey such as Ostreopsis (dinoflagellates) and Palythoa (soft corals), and they need to be monitored, as climate change may increase the risk of toxification of crabs.
Initially, the mouse bioassay (MBA) was widely used to detect toxins, but it was not adequately sensitive and did not reveal the toxin composition. Various instrumental analytical methods have been developed for toxin composition analysis. HPLC is now commonly used for PST analysis, and HPLC fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) with post-column, LC-MS, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), etc., are highly sensitive analytical methods suitable for the qualitative and quantitative analyses of TTX, PLTXs, and PSTs [20,151,152,153]. These instrumental analytical methods are now adequately developed to provide highly sensitive, accurate, and detailed information on toxin concentrations and toxin components in toxic organisms. Thus, they have become one of the reliable tools for deciphering the origin of crab toxins by obtaining detailed toxin profiles and other information from small amounts of sample.
To date, the origin organisms of crab toxins remain poorly understood, except for the toxification mechanism of PSTs that has been identified in two shore crabs, Thalamita acutidens and Charybdis japonica [154]. In the past, attempts have been made to trace the origin of the toxin by observing the stomach contents. However, stomach content analysis has limitations. First, xanthid crabs are omnivorous, and stomach contents vary from region to region and from individual to individual due to differences in the prey fauna of each habitat. In addition, the stomach contents of captured crabs often have little soft tissue remaining due to digestion, and hard calcareous tissues such as shells and bone fragments are often prominent. Furthermore, while it is possible to assess toxicity in the entire stomach content, it is difficult to analyze individual toxins because only very small fragments of each organism remain in the stomach contents. It is also difficult to identify the toxic prey species because the toxin has already leached into the stomach and contaminated the entire stomach content. in recent years, additional attempts have been made to identify the species through genetic analysis [155]. While modern genomic and metagenomic tools have not yet been applied to the study of toxic xanthid crabs, advanced techniques such as 16S rRNA sequencing using high-throughput sequencing technologies have been successfully used in research on puffer fish [123,156]. In addition, genomic mining tools such as antibiotics and secondary metabolite analysis shell (antiSMASH) were also used to research the TTX-producing bacteria Bacillus sp. 1839 [157].
Although the toxins in toxic xanthid crabs are thought to play a defensive role, specific predators of these crabs have rarely been identified. In Nagasaki, toxic octopuses and A. floridus found in the same habitat had similar TTX profiles, suggesting that the octopuses may be feeding on the crabs.

11. Conclusions and Future Perspective

Toxic xanthid crabs are creatures that exhibit a unique toxin transformation. However, their toxicity and their mechanisms of toxin transportation within their bodies and toxin transformation through the food web are still not well understood. Recent studies provide insights into the toxin-origin organisms and potential predators of toxic xanthid crabs. However, continued investigations are essential to comprehensively understand their ecological roles and their toxin accumulation, transportation, and transformation processes. Moreover, marine monitoring and public health education are needed to prevent the risks associated with these toxic crabs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and H.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., H.Z., T.T. and O.A.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, T.T. and O.A.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. and T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Haiyan” Program of Lianyungang, grant number KK25020, Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangsu Ocean University, grant number KQ24061, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, grant number 23K05370.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hashimoto, Y.; Konosu, S.; Yasumoto, T.; Inoue, A.; Noguchi, T. Occurrence of toxic crabs in Ryukyu and Amami Islands. Toxicon 1967, 5, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Daigo, K.; Oikawa, H.; Asakawa, M.; Miyazawa, K. Chapter 36—Different intoxication mechanism between paralytic shellfish toxin (PST)- and/or tetrodotoxin-contaminated xanthid crabs and PST-contaminated edible shore crabs in Japan and their food poisonings. In Handbook of Algal Science, Technology and Medicine; Konur, O., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 575–589. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hashimoto, Y.; KoNosu, S.; Inoue, A.; Saisho, T.; Miyake, S. Screening of toxic crabs in the Ryukyu and Amami Islands. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1969, 35, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Konosu, S.; Inoue, A.; Noguchi, T.; Hashimoto, Y. A further examination on the toxicity of three species of xanthid crab. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1969, 35, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Konosu, S.; Noguchi, T.; Hashimoto, Y. Toxicity of a Xanthid Crab, Zosimus aeneus, and Several Other Species in the Pacific. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1970, 36, 715–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alcala, A.C. Recent cases of crab, cone shell, and fish intoxication on Southern Negros Island, Philippines. Toxicon 1983, 21, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsai, Y.-H.; Jeng, S.-S.; Hwang, D.-F. Seasonal and regional variations of toxicity in the xanthid crab Zosimus aeneus in Taiwan. Fish. Sci. 1997, 63, 313–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Llewellyn, L.E.; Endean, R. Paralytic shellfish toxins in the xanthid crab Atergatis floridus collected from Australian coral reefs. J. Wilderness Med. 1991, 2, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Yamawaki, N.; Morii, Y.; Nishihara, G.N.; Itoi, S.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T. Geographic Variations in the Toxin Profile of the Xanthid Crab Zosimus aeneus in a Single Reef on Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Y.; Du, L.; Zhu, P.; Chen, Y.; Chen, W.; Wu, C.; Wang, P. Recent progress in micro/nano biosensors for shellfish toxin detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 176, 112899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Celio, L.; Ottaviani, M.; Cancelliere, R.; Di Tinno, A.; Panjan, P.; Sesay, A.M.; Micheli, L. Microfluidic Flow Injection Immunoassay System for Algal Toxins Determination: A Case of Study. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 6266320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, B.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, S. A novel screening on the specific peptides by molecular simulation and development of the highly-sensitive electrochemical sensor for saxitoxin. Microchem. J. 2024, 200, 110432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Charapata, P.; Bowers, E.K.; Hardison, D.R.; Kibler, S.; Anderson, D.M.; Fachon, E.; Lefebvre, K.A. Paralytic Shellfish Toxin Concentrations Measured in Alaskan Arctic Clams Using ELISA and HPLC Methods. Toxins 2025, 17, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Petropoulos, K.; Bodini, S.F.; Fabiani, L.; Micheli, L.; Porchetta, A.; Piermarini, S.; Volpe, G.; Pasquazzi, F.M.; Sanfilippo, L.; Moscetta, P.; et al. Re-modeling ELISA kits embedded in an automated system suitable for on-line detection of algal toxins in seawater. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alarcón, S.H.; Laura, M.; Giuseppe, P.; Compagnone, D. Development of an Electrochemical Immunosensor for Ochratoxin A. Anal. Lett. 2004, 37, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, L.-N.; Luo, L.; Wang, B.-Z.; Lei, H.-T.; Guan, T.; Shen, Y.-D.; Wang, H.; Xu, Z.-L. Biosensors for detection of paralytic shellfish toxins: Recognition elements and transduction technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cancelliere, R.; Di Tinno, A.; Cataldo, A.; Bellucci, S.; Kumbhat, S.; Micheli, L. Nafion-based label-free immunosensor as a reliable warning system: The case of AFB1 detection in cattle feed. Microchem. J. 2023, 191, 108868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noguchi, T.; Konosu, S.; Hashimoto, Y. Identity of the crab toxin with saxitoxin. Toxicon 1969, 7, 325–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Noguchi, T.; Uzu, A.; Koyama, K.; Maruyama, j.; Nagashima, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Occurrence of tetrodotoxin as the major toxin in a xanthid crab Atergatis floridus. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1983, 49, 1887–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hammond, H.L.; Roy, C.J. History and Toxinology of Palytoxins. Toxins 2024, 16, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amer, M.A.; Naruse, T.; Reimer, J.D. Morphological and molecular investigation of some xanthid crabs from the Egyptian coast of the Red Sea. Thalass. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2023, 39, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takeda, M.; Komatsu, H. A New and Some Rare Crabs of the Families Trapeziidae, Oziidae and Xanthidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. A Zool. 2024, 50, 97–122. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, J.N.; Kim, M.H. A new record of the xanthid crab, Demania rotundata (Serène in Guinot, 1969) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthioidea) from Korean waters. Crustaceana 2023, 96, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mendoza, E.; Christopher, J. Marine crabs new to Singapore, with a description of a new species of intertidal xanthid crab of the genus Macromedaeus Ward, 1942 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Raffles Bull. Zool. 2021, 69, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saisho, T.; Noguchi, T.; Koyama, K.; Uzu, A.; Kikuta, T.; Hashimoto, K. Examination of stomach contents in xanthid crabs. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1983, 49, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ryan, E.P. Observations on the Life Histories and the Distribution of the Xanthidae (Mud Crabs) of Chesapeake Bay. Am. Midl. Nat. 1956, 56, 138–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fatfat, S.; Badreddine, A.; Aguilar, R. Expanding Boundaries: Documenting Two Xanthid Crabs (Atergatis integerrimus and Liomera rugipes) in the Mediterranean Sea from Lebanese Waters. J. Fish. Livest. Prod. 2024, 12, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Knudsen, J.W. Shell Formation and Growth of the California Xanthid Crabs. Ecology 1959, 40, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fredrick, W.S.; Ravichandran, S.; Balasubramanian, T. Toxicity of Brachuryan crabs in India. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2011, 93, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tanaka, H.; Saruwatari, T.; Minami, T. Redescription of the first zoea of Zosimus aeneus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Xanthidae). Crustac. Res. 2009, 38, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ghory, F.a.J.A. Morpho-taxonomic study of first zoeas of Atergatis integerrimus (Lamarck, 1801) and A. floridus (Linnaeus, 1767)(Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthidae) reared in the laboratory. Arthropods 2022, 11, 215. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tanaka, H.; Konishi, K. Atergatis floridus (Linnaeus, 1767) (Decapoda: Xanthidae): Re-examination and correction of zoeal characters. Crustac. Res. 2009, 38, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koyama, K.; Noguchi, T.; Uzu, A.; Hashimoto, K. Individual, local, and size-dependent variations in toxicity of the xanthid crab Zosimus aeneus. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1983, 49, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Raj, U.; Haq, H.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T. The occurrence of paralytic shellfish toxins in two species of xanthid crab from Suva barrier reef, Fiji Islands. Toxicon 1983, 21, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yasumura, D.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T.; Alcala, A.C.; Alcala, L.C. Tetrodotoxin and Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Philippine Crabs. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1986, 50, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ho, P.-H.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Hwang, C.-C.; Hwang, P.-A.; Hwang, J.-H.; Hwang, D.-F. Paralytic toxins in four species of coral reef crabs from Kenting National Park in southern Taiwan. Food Control 2006, 17, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sagara, T.; Taniyama, S.; Takatani, T.; Nishibori, N.; Nishio, S.; Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O. Toxicity and toxin profiles of xanthid crabs collected around Nakanoshima in the Tokara Islands, Japan. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 2009, 50, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Daigo, K.; Hashimoto, K. Local differences in toxin composition of a xanthid crab Atergatis floridus inhabiting Ishigaki Island, Okinawa. Toxicon 1986, 24, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsai, Y.-H.; Hwang, D.-F.; Chai, T.-J.; Jeng, S.-S. Toxicity and toxic components of two xanthid crabs, Atergatis floridus and Demania reynaudi, in taiwan. Toxicon 1997, 35, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saito, T.; Kohama, T.; Ui, K.; Watabe, S. Distribution of tetrodotoxin in the xanthid crab (Atergatis floridus) collected in the coastal waters of Kanagawa and Wakayama Prefectures. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2006, 1, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Asakawa, M.; Tsuruda, S.; Ishimoto, Y.; Shimomura, M.; Kishimoto, K.; Shida, Y.; Barte-Quilantang, M.; Gomez-Delan, G. Paralytic toxin profiles of xanthid crab Atergatis floridus collected on reefs of Ishigaki Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan and Camotes Island, Cebu Province, Philippines. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2014, 3, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Yamate, Y.; Takegaki, T.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T. Tetrodotoxin Profiles in Xanthid Crab Atergatis floridus and Blue-Lined Octopus Hapalochlaena cf. fasciata from the Same Site in Nagasaki, Japan. Toxins 2023, 15, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yasumoto, T.; Yasumura, D.; Ohizumi, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Alcala, A.C.; Alcala, L.C. Palytoxin in Two Species of Xanthid Crab from the Philippines. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1986, 50, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lau, C.O.; Khoo, H.E.; Yuen, R.; Wan, M.; Tan, C.H. Isolation of a novel fluorescent toxin from the coral reef crab, Lophozozymus pictor. Toxicon 1993, 31, 1341–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chia, D.G.B.; Lau, C.O.; Ng, P.K.L.; Tan, C.H. Localization of toxins in the poisonous mosaic crab, Lophozozymus pictor (Fabricius, 1798) (Brachyura, Xanthidae). Toxicon 1993, 31, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsai, Y.-H.; Hwang, D.-F.; Chai, T.-J.; Jeng, S.-S. Occurrence of tetrodotoxin and paralytic shellfish poison in the Taiwanese crab Lophozozymus pictor. Toxicon 1995, 33, 1669–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsai, Y.-H.; Hwang, D.-F.; Chai, T.-J.; Jeng, S.-S. Occurrence of paralytic toxin in Taiwanese crab Atergatopsis germaini. Toxicon 1996, 34, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Llewellyn, L.E.; Endean, R. Toxins extracted from Australian specimens of the crab, Eriphia sebana (Xanthidae). Toxicon 1989, 27, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alcala, A.C.; Alcala, L.C.; Garth, J.S.; Yasumura, D.; Yasumoto, T. Human fatality due to ingestion of the crab Demania reynaudii that contained a palytoxin-like toxin. Toxicon 1988, 26, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Asakawa, M.; Gomez-Delan, G.; Tsuruda, S.; Shimomura, M.; Shida, Y.; Taniyama, S.; Barte-Quilantang, M.; Shindo, J. Toxicity assessment of the xanthid crab Demania cultripes from Cebu Island, Philippines. J. Toxicol. 2010, 2010, 172367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Llewellyn, L.E.; Endean, R. Toxic coral reef crabs from Australian waters. Toxicon 1988, 26, 1085–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gleibs, S.; Mebs, D.; Werding, B. Studies on the origin and distribution of palytoxin in a Caribbean coral reef. Toxicon 1995, 33, 1531–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gleibs, S.; Mebs, D. Distribution and sequestration of palytoxin in coral reef animals. Toxicon 1999, 37, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tsai, Y.-H.; Ho, P.-H.; Jeng, S.-S.; Hwang, D.-F. Paralytic toxins in Taiwanese crab Xanthias lividus. Fish. Sci. 2002, 68, 659–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Edmondson, C.H. Xanthidae of Hawaii. Citeseer: University Park, PA, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ng, P.K.L.; Guinot, D.; Davie, P. Systema Brachyurorum: Part I. An annotated checklist of extant Brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2008, 17, 1–296. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hwang, D.F.; Tsai, Y.H. Toxins in toxic Taiwanese crabs. Food Rev. Int. 1999, 15, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ng, P.; Chia, D. Lophozozymus erinnyes, a new species of poisonous crab from Australia, with notes on L. pictor (Fabricius, 1798), L. incisus (H. Milne Edwards, 1834) and L. edwardsi (Odhner, 1925) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthidae). Raffles Bull. Zool. 1997, 45, 419–443. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ng, P.K.; Yang, C.M. On some species of Demania Laurie, 1906 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthidae) from Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines, with a key for the genus. Raffles Bull. Zool. 1989, 37, 37–50. [Google Scholar]
  60. Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Onoue, Y. Paralytic shellfish toxin profiles of xanthid crabs Zosimus aeneus and Atergatis floridus collected on reefs of Ishigaki Island. Fish. Sci. 1995, 61, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Shida, Y.; Onoue, Y. Occurrence of 11-Oxotetrodotoxin and 11-Nortetrodotoxin-6 (R)-ol in a xanthid crab Atergatis floridus collected at Kojima, Ishigaki Island. Fish. Sci. 1994, 60, 769–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aligizaki, K.; Katikou, P.; Milandri, A.; Diogène, J. Occurrence of palytoxin-group toxins in seafood and future strategies to complement the present state of the art. Toxicon 2011, 57, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ramos, V.; Vasconcelos, V. Palytoxin and Analogs: Biological and Ecological Effects. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2021–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tan, K.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, H. Effects of harmful algal blooms on the physiological, immunity and resistance to environmental stress of bivalves: Special focus on paralytic shellfish poisoning and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. Aquaculture 2023, 563, 739000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schantz, E.J.; Ghazarossian, V.E.; Schnoes, H.K.; Strong, F.M.; Springer, J.P.; Pezzanite, J.O.; Clardy, J. Structure of saxitoxin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 1238–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nakamura, M.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T. Occurrence of saxitoxin in puffer fish. Toxicon 1984, 22, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Freitas, J.C.; Ogata, T.; Veit, C.H.; Kodama, M. Occurrence of tetrodotoxin and paralytic shellfish toxins in Phallusia nigra (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) from the Brazilian coast. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins 1996, 2, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Leal, J.F.; Cristiano, M.L.S. Marine paralytic shellfish toxins: Chemical properties, mode of action, newer analogues, and structure–toxicity relationship†. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Shida, Y.; Onoue, Y. Occurrence of carbamoyl-N-hydroxy derivatives of saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin in a xanthid crab Zosimus aeneus. Toxicon 1994, 32, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arakawa, O.; Nishio, S.; Noguchi, T.; Shida, Y.; Onoue, Y. A new saxitoxin analogue from a xanthid crab Atergatis floridus. Toxicon 1995, 33, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cusick, K.D.; Sayler, G.S. An Overview on the Marine Neurotoxin, Saxitoxin: Genetics, Molecular Targets, Methods of Detection and Ecological Functions. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 991–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kotaki, Y.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T. Bacterial transformation of paralytic shellfish toxins in coral reef crabs and a marine snail. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1985, 51, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Onoue, Y. Transformation of gonyautoxins in the xanthid crab Atergatis floridus. Fish. Sci. 1998, 64, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Raposo, M.I.C.; Gomes, M.T.S.R.; Botelho, M.J.; Rudnitskaya, A. Paralytic Shellfish Toxins (PST)-Transforming Enzymes: A Review. Toxins 2020, 12, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Katikou, P.; Gokbulut, C.; Kosker, A.R.; Campàs, M.; Ozogul, F. An Updated Review of Tetrodotoxin and Its Peculiarities. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Melnikova, D.I.; Magarlamov, T.Y. An Overview of the Anatomical Distribution of Tetrodotoxin in Animals. Toxins 2022, 14, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T.; Taniyama, S.; Tatsuno, R. Toxins of Pufferfish—Distribution, Accumulation Mechanism, and Physiologic Functions. Aqua-Biosci. Monogr. ABSM 2017, 10, 41–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sheumack, D.; Howden, M.; Spence, I.; Quinn, R.J.S. Maculotoxin: A neurotoxin from the venom glands of the octopus Hapalochlaena maculosa identified as tetrodotoxin. Science 1978, 199, 188–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mosher, H.; Fuhrman, F.; Buchwald, H.; Fischer, H.J.S. Tarichatoxin—Tetrodotoxin: A Potent Neurotoxin: A nonprotein substance isolated from the California newt is the same as the toxin from the puffer fish. Science 1964, 144, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, Y.H.; Brown, G.B.; Mosher, F.A. Tetrodotoxin: Occurrence in atelopid frogs of Costa Rica. Science 1975, 189, 151–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bane, V.; Lehane, M.; Dikshit, M.; O’Riordan, A.; Furey, A. Tetrodotoxin: Chemistry, Toxicity, Source, Distribution and Detection. Toxins 2014, 6, 693–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Sugimoto, A.; Takai, A.; Yasumoto, T. Effects of Specific Modifications of Several Hydroxyls of Tetrodotoxin on Its Affinity to Rat Brain Membrane. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 289, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Teramoto, N.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M. Selective Blocking Effects of 4,9-Anhydrotetrodotoxin, Purified from a Crude Mixture of Tetrodotoxin Analogues, on NaV1.6 Channels and Its Chemical Aspects. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 984–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Moore, R.E.; Scheuer, P.J. Palytoxin: A New Marine Toxin from a Coelenterate. Science 1971, 172, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Usami, M.; Satake, M.; Ishida, S.; Inoue, A.; Kan, Y.; Yasumoto, T. Palytoxin analogs from the dinoflagellate Ostreopsis siamensis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5389–5390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aligizaki, K.; Katikou, P.; Nikolaidis, G.; Panou, A. First episode of shellfish contamination by palytoxin-like compounds from Ostreopsis species (Aegean Sea, Greece). Toxicon 2008, 51, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Taniyama, S.; Arakawa, O.; Terada, M.; Nishio, S.; Takatani, T.; Mahmud, Y.; Noguchi, T. Ostreopsis sp., a possible origin of palytoxin (PTX) in parrotfish Scarus ovifrons. Toxicon 2003, 42, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ciminiello, P.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Dello Iacovo, E.; Forino, M.; Tartaglione, L.; Pelin, M.; Sosa, S.; Tubaro, A.; Chaloin, O.; Poli, M.; et al. Stereoisomers of 42-Hydroxy Palytoxin from Hawaiian Palythoa toxica and P. tuberculosa: Stereostructure Elucidation, Detection, and Biological Activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Arteaga-Sogamoso, E.; Riobó, P.; Rodríguez, F.; Mancera-Pineda, J.E.; Franco-Angulo, J. First record of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum borbonicum in the continental coast of Colombian Caribbean: A new 42 hydroxi-palytoxin producer. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 973250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deeds, J.R.; Schwartz, M.D. Human risk associated with palytoxin exposure. Toxicon 2010, 56, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Noguchi, T.; Miyazawa, K.; Daigo, K.; Arakawa, O. Paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxin- and/or tetrodotoxin-contaminated crabs and food poisoning by them. Toxin Rev. 2011, 30, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Garth, J.; Emeritus, C.; Foundation, A.; Alcala, A. Poisonous crabs of Indo-west Pacific coral reefs, with special reference to the genus Demania Laurie. In Proceedings of the Third International Coral Reef Symposium, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Miami, FL, USA, May 1977; pp. 645–651. [Google Scholar]
  93. Dao Viet, H.; Hy, L.H.K.; Trinh, T.S.H.; Tung, N.N.; Ky, P.X. Toxin Responsible for Xanthid Crab Poisoning in Tinh Gia District, Thanh Hoa Province, Viet Nam. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2023, 49, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alcala, A.; Halstead, B. Human Fatality Due to Ingestion of the Crab Demania sp. in the Philippines. Clin. Toxicol. 1971, 3, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gonzales, R.B.; Alcala, A.C. Fatalities from crab poisoning on Negros Island, Phillippines. Toxicon 1977, 15, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Llewellyn, L.E. Human fatalities in Vanuatu after eating a crab (Daira perlata). Med. J. Aust. 2001, 175, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Llewellyn, L.E.; Dodd, M.J.; Robertson, A.; Ericson, G.; de Koning, C.; Negri, A.P. Post-mortem analysis of samples from a human victim of a fatal poisoning caused by the xanthid crab, Zosimus aeneus. Toxicon 2002, 40, 1463–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mebs, D. Occurrence and sequestration of toxins in food chains. Toxicon 1998, 36, 1519–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jal, S.; Khora, S.S. An overview on the origin and production of tetrodotoxin, a potent neurotoxin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wiese, M.; D’Agostino, P.M.; Mihali, T.K.; Moffitt, M.C.; Neilan, B.A. Neurotoxic Alkaloids: Saxitoxin and Its Analogs. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2185–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O. Tetrodotoxin--distribution and accumulation in aquatic organisms, and cases of human intoxication. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 220–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Seemann, P.; Gernert, C.; Schmitt, S.; Mebs, D.; Hentschel, U. Detection of hemolytic bacteria from Palythoa caribaeorum (Cnidaria, Zoantharia) using a novel palytoxin-screening assay. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2009, 96, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kerbrat, A.S.; Amzil, Z.; Pawlowiez, R.; Golubic, S.; Sibat, M.; Darius, H.T.; Chinain, M.; Laurent, D. First Evidence of Palytoxin and 42-Hydroxy-palytoxin in the Marine Cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dean, K.J.; Hatfield, R.G.; Lee, V.; Alexander, R.P.; Lewis, A.M.; Maskrey, B.H.; Teixeira Alves, M.; Hatton, B.; Coates, L.N.; Capuzzo, E.; et al. Multiple New Paralytic Shellfish Toxin Vectors in Offshore North Sea Benthos, a Deep Secret Exposed. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tanaka, H.; Saruwatari, T.; Minami, T. Larval development of two Atergatis species (Decapoda, Xanthidae) described from laboratory-reared material. Crustac. Res. 2010, 39, 11–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Monniot, C.; Monniot, F.; Laboute, P. Coral Reef Ascidians of New Caledonia; ORSTOM: Paris, France, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  107. Varol, O.; Houghton, S.D. A review and classification of fossil didemnid ascidian spicules. J. Micropalaeontol. 1996, 15, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hirose, M.; Tochikubo, T.; Hirose, E. Taxonomic significance of tunic spicules in photosymbiotic ascidians: A quantitative and molecular evaluation. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2010, 90, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Roje-Busatto, R.; Ujević, I. PSP toxins profile in ascidian Microcosmus vulgaris (Heller, 1877) after human poisoning in Croatia (Adriatic Sea). Toxicon 2014, 79, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kotaki, Y.; Tajiri, M.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T. Identification of a calcareous red alga as the primary source of paralytic shellfish toxins in coral reef crabs and gastropods. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1983, 49, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Aratake, S.; Taira, Y.; Fujii, T.; Roy, M.C.; Reimer, J.D.; Yamazaki, T.; Jenke-Kodama, H. Distribution of palytoxin in coral reef organisms living in close proximity to an aggregation of Palythoa tuberculosa. Toxicon 2016, 111, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Magarlamov, T.Y.; Melnikova, D.I.; Chernyshev, A.V. Tetrodotoxin-Producing Bacteria: Detection, Distribution and Migration of the Toxin in Aquatic Systems. Toxins 2017, 9, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, J.; Persson, K.M. Quick detection method for paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) monitoring in freshwater—A review. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 128591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zheng, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hua, Y. Contamination status of paralytic shellfish toxins in shellfish from Southeastern China in 2017–2021. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 34728–34740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Noguchi, T.; Jeon, J.-k.; Arakawa, O.; Sugita, H.; Deguchi, Y.; Shida, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Occurrence of tetrodotoxin and anhydrotetrodotoxin in Vibrio sp. isolated from the intestines of a xanthid crab, Atergatis floridus. J. Biochem. 1986, 99, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Yasumoto, T.; Yasumura, D.; Yotsu, M.; Michishita, T.; Endo, A.; Kotaki, Y. Bacterial production of tetrodotoxin and anhydrotetrodotoxin. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1986, 50, 793–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kungsuwan, A.; Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Simidu, U.; Tsukamoto, K.; Shida, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Tetrodotoxin-Producing Bacteria from the Horseshoe Crab Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1988, 54, 1799–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Do, H.; Kogure, K.; Simidu, U.J.A. Identification of deep-sea-sediment bacteria which produce tetrodotoxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 1162–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T. TTX accumulation in pufferfish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 2006, 1, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gao, W.; Kanahara, Y.; Yamada, M.; Tatsuno, R.; Yoshikawa, H.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Contrasting toxin selectivity between the marine pufferfish Takifugu pardalis and the freshwater pufferfish Pao suvattii. Toxins 2019, 11, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhu, H.; Sonoyama, T.; Yamada, M.; Gao, W.; Tatsuno, R.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Co-Occurrence of Tetrodotoxin and Saxitoxins and Their Intra-Body Distribution in the Pufferfish Canthigaster valentini. Toxins 2020, 12, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Magarlamov, T.Y.; Beleneva, I.A.; Chernyshev, A.V.; Kuhlevsky, A.D. Tetrodotoxin-producing Bacillus sp. from the ribbon worm (Nemertea) Cephalothrix simula (Iwata, 1952). Toxicon 2014, 85, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, Z.; Tian, J.; Lai, Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Cai, Z.; Yu, C.-F. Puffer Fish Gut Microbiota Studies Revealed Unique Bacterial Co-Occurrence Patterns and New Insights on Tetrodotoxin Producers. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Amzil, Z.; Sibat, M.; Chomerat, N.; Grossel, H.; Marco-Miralles, F.; Lemee, R.; Nezan, E.; Sechet, V. Ovatoxin-a and Palytoxin Accumulation in Seafood in Relation to Ostreopsis cf. ovata Blooms on the French Mediterranean Coast. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hirose, E.; Nozawa, Y. Photosymbiotic Ascidians from Kenting and Lyudao in Taiwan. Zool. Stud. 2010, 49, 681–687. [Google Scholar]
  126. Hirose, E.; Nozawa, Y. Latitudinal Difference in the Species Richness of Photosymbiotic Ascidians Along the East Coast of Taiwan. Zool. Stud. 2020, 59, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Saito, T.; Noguchi, T.; Harada, T.; Murata, O.; Abe, T.; Hashimoto, K. Resistibility of Toxic and Nontoxic Pufferfish against Tetrodotoxin. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1985, 51, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Noguchi, T.; Hashimoto, Y. Isolation of tetrodotoxin from a goby Gobius criniger. Toxicon 1973, 11, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bricelj, V.M.; Connell, L.; Konoki, K.; MacQuarrie, S.P.; Scheuer, T.; Catterall, W.A.; Trainer, V.L. Sodium channel mutation leading to saxitoxin resistance in clams increases risk of PSP. Nature 2005, 434, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kaneko, Y.; Matsumoto, G.; Hanyu, Y. TTX resistivity of Na+ channel in newt retinal neuron. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 240, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Koyama, K.; Noguchi, T.; Uzu, A.; Hashimoto, K. Resistibility of Toxic and Nontoxic Crabs against Paralytic Shellfish Poison and Tetrodotoxin. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1983, 49, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Daigo, K.; Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Uzu, A.; Hashimoto, K. Resistibility of Two Xanthid Crabs Zosimus aeneus and Daira perlata against Paralytic Shellfish Poison and Tetrodotoxin. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1987, 53, 881–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Daigo, K.; Noguchi, T.; Miwa, A.; Kawai, N.; Hashimoto, K. Resistance of nerves from certain toxic crabs to paralytic shellfish poison and tetrodotoxin. Toxicon 1988, 26, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lu, J.; Zheng, J.; Xu, Q.; Chen, K.; Zhang, C. Adaptive evolution of the vertebrate skeletal muscle sodium channel. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2011, 34, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Sugimoto, A.; Terakawa, T.; Shoji, Y.; Miyazawa, T.; Yasumoto, T. Purification, characterization, and cDNA cloning of a novel soluble saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin binding protein from plasma of the puffer fish, Fugu pardalis. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 5937–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Dong, Z.; Guo, H.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Xie, W. Identification of novel paralytic shellfish toxin binding protein via homology modeling and molecular docking. Toxicon 2022, 211, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Takati, N.; Mountassif, D.; Taleb, H.; Lee, K.; Blaghen, M. Purification and partial characterization of paralytic shellfish poison-binding protein from Acanthocardia tuberculatum. Toxicon 2007, 50, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Nagashima, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Shimakura, K.; Shiomi, K. A tetrodotoxin-binding protein in the hemolymph of shore crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus: Purification and properties. Toxicon 2002, 40, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Llewellyn, L.E. Haemolymph protein in xanthid crabs: Its selective binding of saxitoxin and possible role in toxin bioaccumulation. Mar. Biol. 1997, 128, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nagashima, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Okai, M.; Kitani, Y.; Yoshinaga-Kiriake, A.; Ishizaki, S. Primary Structure and Conformation of a Tetrodotoxin-Binding Protein in the Hemolymph of Non-Toxic Shore Crab Hemigrapsus sanguineus. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Noguchi, T.; Daigo, K.; Arakawa, O.; Hashimoto, Y. Release of paralytic shellfish poison from the exoskeleton of a xanthid crab Zosimus aeneus. In Toxic Dinoflagellates; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 495–500. [Google Scholar]
  142. Yamate, Y.; Takatani, T.; Takegaki, T. Levels and distribution of tetrodotoxin in the blue-lined octopus Hapalochlaena fasciata in Japan, with special reference to within-body allocation. J. Molluscan Stud. 2021, 87, eyaa042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jacups, S.P.; Currie, B.J. Blue-ringed Octopuses: A Brief Review of Their Toxicology. North. Territ. Nat. 2008, 20, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ambrose, R.F. Food preferences, prey availability, and the diet of Octopus Bimaculatus Verrill. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1984, 77, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Williams, B.L.; Lovenburg, V.; Huffard, C.L.; Caldwell, R.L. Chemical defense in pelagic octopus paralarvae: Tetrodotoxin alone does not protect individual paralarvae of the greater blue-ringed octopus (Hapalochlaena lunulata) from common reef predators. Chemoecology 2011, 21, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Pech-Puch, D.; Cruz-López, H.; Canche-Ek, C.; Campos-Espinosa, G.; García, E.; Mascaro, M.; Rosas, C.; Chávez-Velasco, D.; Rodríguez-Morales, S. Chemical Tools of Octopus maya during Crab Predation Are Also Active on Conspecifics. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Roggatz, C.C.; Fletcher, N.; Benoit, D.M.; Algar, A.C.; Doroff, A.; Wright, B.; Wollenberg Valero, K.C.; Hardege, J.D. Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin bioavailability increases in future oceans. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Borges, F.O.; Lopes, V.M.; Amorim, A.; Santos, C.F.; Costa, P.R.; Rosa, R. Projecting Future Climate Change-Mediated Impacts in Three Paralytic Shellfish Toxins-Producing Dinoflagellate Species. Biology 2022, 11, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yamate, Y.; Toyomasu, N.; Takegaki, T. Distribution, body size and maturation pattern of the blue-lined octopus Hapalochlaena cf. fasciata in Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 2022, 88, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kajino, N.; Shin, J.-S.; Hong, H.-K.; Subramaniam, T.; Chae, J.H.; Noh, T.H.; Chun, H.S.; Choi, K.-S. Detection of Tetrodotoxin in the Xanthid Crab Atergatis floridus (Linnaeus, 1767) Collected from Jeju Island off the South Coast of Korea, Using Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (cELISA). Ocean Sci. J. 2024, 59, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Oshima, Y. Post-column devivatization HPLC method for analysis of PSP. J. AOAC Int. 1995, 78, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Rodríguez, P.; Alfonso, A.; Otero, P.; Katikou, P.; Georgantelis, D.; Botana, L.M. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method to detect Tetrodotoxin and Its analogues in the puffer fish Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789) from European waters. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Turner, A.D.; Dhanji-Rapkova, M.; Fong, S.Y.T.; Hungerford, J.; McNabb, P.S.; Boundy, M.J.; Harwood, D.T.; Collaborators. Ultrahigh-Performance Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins and Tetrodotoxin in Mussels, Oysters, Clams, Cockles, and Scallops: Collaborative Study. J. AOAC Int. 2020, 103, 533–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Oikawa, H.; Fujita, T.; Saito, K.; Watabe, S.; Satomi, M.; Yano, Y. Comparison of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxin between carnivorous crabs (Telmessus acutidens and Charybdis japonica) and their prey mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in an inshore food chain. Toxicon 2004, 43, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Itoi, S.; Sato, T.; Takei, M.; Yamada, R.; Ogata, R.; Oyama, H.; Teranishi, S.; Kishiki, A.; Wada, T.; Noguchi, K.; et al. The planocerid flatworm is a main supplier of toxin to tetrodotoxin-bearing fish juveniles. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wassel, M.A.; Makabe-Kobayashi, Y.; Iqbal, M.M.; Takatani, T.; Sakakura, Y.; Hamasaki, K. The impact of tetrodotoxin (TTX) on the gut microbiome in juvenile tiger pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 16684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Melnikova, D.I.; Nijland, R.; Magarlamov, T.Y. The First Data on the Complete Genome of a Tetrodotoxin-Producing Bacterium. Toxins 2021, 13, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 17 00228 g001
Figure 1. Photos of the typical toxic xanthid crabs: (A) Zosimus aeneus, (B) Atergatis floridus, and (C) Platypodia granulosa. Scale bar: 1 cm.
Figure 1. Photos of the typical toxic xanthid crabs: (A) Zosimus aeneus, (B) Atergatis floridus, and (C) Platypodia granulosa. Scale bar: 1 cm.
Toxins 17 00228 g001
Toxins 17 00228 g002
Figure 2. The structures of PST and PST analogs usually detected in toxic xanthid crabs. STX: saxitoxin; GTX: gonyautoxin; dc: decarbamoyl; hy: carbamoyl-N-hydroxy; hyneo: carbamoyl-N-hydroxyneo.
Figure 2. The structures of PST and PST analogs usually detected in toxic xanthid crabs. STX: saxitoxin; GTX: gonyautoxin; dc: decarbamoyl; hy: carbamoyl-N-hydroxy; hyneo: carbamoyl-N-hydroxyneo.
Toxins 17 00228 g002
Toxins 17 00228 g003
Figure 3. The structures of TTX and TTX analogs usually detected in toxic xanthid crabs.
Figure 3. The structures of TTX and TTX analogs usually detected in toxic xanthid crabs.
Toxins 17 00228 g003
Toxins 17 00228 g004
Figure 4. Structure of palytoxin.
Figure 4. Structure of palytoxin.
Toxins 17 00228 g004
Toxins 17 00228 g005
Figure 5. Maps of the small-scale distribution of toxin profiles and toxin concentrations: Site A and Site B from Asakawa et al. [41], and three zones on Yoshihara Reef from Zhang et al. [9].
Figure 5. Maps of the small-scale distribution of toxin profiles and toxin concentrations: Site A and Site B from Asakawa et al. [41], and three zones on Yoshihara Reef from Zhang et al. [9].
Toxins 17 00228 g005
Toxins 17 00228 g006
Figure 6. Frequency of toxic xanthid crab investigations.
Figure 6. Frequency of toxic xanthid crab investigations.
Toxins 17 00228 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Toxin Accumulation, Distribution, and Sources of Toxic Xanthid Crabs. Toxins 2025, 17, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050228

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhu H, Takatani T, Arakawa O. Toxin Accumulation, Distribution, and Sources of Toxic Xanthid Crabs. Toxins. 2025; 17(5):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yuchengmin, Hongchen Zhu, Tomohiro Takatani, and Osamu Arakawa. 2025. "Toxin Accumulation, Distribution, and Sources of Toxic Xanthid Crabs" Toxins 17, no. 5: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050228

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Zhu, H., Takatani, T., & Arakawa, O. (2025). Toxin Accumulation, Distribution, and Sources of Toxic Xanthid Crabs. Toxins, 17(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop