Next Article in Journal
Immunological Cross-Reactivity and Preclinical Assessment of a Colombian Anticoral Antivenom against the Venoms of Three Micrurus Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Cyanopeptolins and Anabaenopeptins Are the Dominant Cyanopeptides from Planktothrix Strains Collected in Canadian Lakes
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Pulmonary Damage in Surviving Antitoxin-Treated Mice following a Lethal Ricin Intoxication
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fungal Species and Mycotoxins Associated with Maize Ear Rots Collected from the Eastern Cape in South Africa
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Influence of Long-Term Storage on the Epiphytic Microbiome of Postharvest Apples and on Penicillium expansum Occurrence and Patulin Accumulation

by Reem Al Riachy 1, Caroline Strub 1, Noël Durand 1,2, Vincent Chochois 1,2, Félicie Lopez-Lauri 1, Angélique Fontana 1 and Sabine Schorr-Galindo 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 31 January 2024 / Accepted: 4 February 2024 / Published: 12 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxins: 15th Anniversary)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper  is very well organised and written , it gives new insights on the post-harvest and long-term storage effects on the formation of fungi and bacteria including their intra-species relationships in apple. This study also provide more detailed evaluation on the effects of fungal growth of Penicillium expansum and patulin contents in apples. Considering the high risk concerns of this mycotoxin, new insights of the biocontrol of fungal growth may give very high value to this publication. It also   indicates remaining issues of  patulin growth  even under the cold storage conditions and need for proper  monitoring of potential contamination of these fruits.

The abstract is clear and covers all the parts of the paper.

As well, the brief Introduction part describes the problem and the new insights of the study.

The section dedicated to patulin content analysis is very short and presents only brief description of the table data. It is interesting that there was so high difference in concentrations of patulin in organic samples after the end of storage, which is suprisingly, considering the lower concentrations during other stages. The  explanation about such levels increasing the allowed level of 50 µg.kg-1 should be explained.

It would be recommmended to discuss later  the patulin concentration levels with that reported by other authors and better evaluate the  coocurence of patulin contents and fungal contents.

The other sections of fungal and  bacterial prevalence and correlatin analysis  are well written.

There are somewhere some corrections needed. For example, µg/kg and µg.kg-1 forms are used (recommmended to use µg kg-1 (with minus 1 with Superscript).

As well, there are somewher P. expansum used in full form Penicillinum expansum and in some cases itallics is needed – lines 123, 721 ).

It is not clear from Fig 11, what are 10 mg, whereas  authors mention 5 g of apple pure.

Otherwise this is very valuable paper.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

no

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear editor,

Thank you very much for considering me as a reviewer for the manuscript entitled “The influence of long-term storage on the epiphytic microbiome of postharvest apples and on Penicillium expansum occurrence and patulin accumulation”. The manuscript is of high quality, it is well organized and clear. This work is focused on the investigation of the effect of multiple post-harvest stages on the incidence of P. expansum and patulin contamination in apples of the variety “Golden Delicious”, conventionally or organically cultivated and destined for industrialization. Moreover, the analysis done in this study provides a basis for further fungal and bacterial interactions  for the fruit disease bio-control.

Following is a list of suggestions for the authors to address to improve the manuscript:

It is not clear if there evident signs of blue mould decay were found when/where P. expansum was isolated; please clarify this in the results or discussion section.

The results of patulin in apples are expressed in ug/kg of apple, but the calibration curve is expressed in ng/ml, please convert accordingly to have it expressed in the same units.

Line 7: replace contamination for infection

Line 10: replace contaminating for infecting

Line 29: replace culture for cultivation

Line 37: update reference to last year, 5 years have passed from 2018.

Line 56-59: it is also regulated in other regions or countries, please include.

Line 473: rephrase “This step was critical for both patulin and P. expansum contamination” for “This step was critical for patulin contamination and P. expansum infection”

Line 476: replace contamination for infection

Line 596: replace produces by produced

Line 610: remove extra space

Line 623: write pullulans in italics

Line 808: replace biologically for organically to make it consistent

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This work identified two critical control points of contamination of apples by P. expansum in post-harvest stages and evaluated the risk of patulin accumulation in the apple-based products.  Meanwhile, this study evaluated the effect of a long-term storage and multiple processing steps on the epiphytic microbiome of apples and the effect of the latter on the growth and toxinogenesis of P. expansum. This work could provide a basis for further fungal and bacterial interactions analysis for the fruit disease biocontrol. However, minor revision is required before publication of this article.

In the introduction, the bibliography should be oriented on the main goal of the article: the fruit microbiome.

Concerning the figures:  Figure 1 is fuzzy and needs to be changed to a clearer version.

In addition, the interpretation of results has to be pushed further.  The results presented in Figures or Tables do not have to be also described in the text.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The manuscript need an minor editing of English language and style in order to be comprehensible.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I think that in the conclusions there is quite a lot of information that can also be found in the discussions and as such I think that only the conclusion part should remain in a few sentences 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop