Next Article in Journal
Pyroptosis: A Common Feature of Immune Cells of Haemodialysis Patients
Previous Article in Journal
New Strategies for the Reduction of Uremic Toxins: How Much More We Know
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/toxins13120838
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Diversity of Microcystins Produced by Cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea)

by
Donata Overlingė
1,*,
Anna Toruńska-Sitarz
2,
Marija Kataržytė
1,
Renata Pilkaitytė
1,
Greta Gyraitė
1 and
Hanna Mazur-Marzec
2
1
Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, University Avenue 17, 92295 Klaipeda, Lithuania
2
Division of Marine Biotechnology, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Marszałka J. Piłsudskiego 46, PL-81378 Gdynia, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2021, 13(12), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13120838
Submission received: 10 November 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Microcystins (MCs) are the most widely distributed and structurally diverse cyanotoxins that can have significant health impacts on living organisms, including humans. The identification of MC variants and their quantification is very important for toxicological assessment. Within this study, we explored the diversity of MCs and their potential producers from the Curonian Lagoon. MC profiles were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method, while the potential producers were detected based on the presence of genus-specific mcyE gene sequences. Among the numerous MCs detected, one new potential MC variant with m/z 1057 was partially characterized. Moreover, two other MCs with m/z 1075 and m/z 1068 might belong to new variants with serine (Ser), rarely detected in position one of the peptides. They might also represent MC-Y(OMe)R and MC-WR, respectively. However, the application of a low-resolution MS/MS system made the unambiguous identification of the MCs impossible. Based on this example, the problems of peptide structure identification are discussed in the work. Genetic analysis revealed that potential MCs producers include Dolichospermum/Anabaena, Microcystis spp., and Planktothrix agardhii. The diversity and temporal variations in MC profiles may indicate the presence of several chemotypes of cyanobacteria in the Curonian Lagoon.
Keywords:
microcystin; cyanotoxin; mass spectrometry; structure elucidation
Key Contribution: This study demonstrates the diversity of MCs (20 variants) detected in the Curonian Lagoon. One potentially new MC variant with m/z 1057 was characterized based on a partially elucidated structure.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria are widely distributed oxygenic phototrophs that play an important role in the aquatic environment. Under favorable conditions, they form blooms, which have a negative effect on the ecosystem [1]. Although cyanobacteria are not considered infectious microorganisms, the toxins they synthesize have significant health impacts on living organisms, including humans [2].
The species producing cyanotoxins belong mainly to the orders Oscillatoriales, Nostocales, Chroococcales, and Synechococcales [3,4]. Among cyanotoxins, microcystins (MCs) are the most frequently studied and structurally diverse compounds [2,4,5]. To date, more than 280 variants of MCs are listed [6]. These toxins cause abnormal hepatocyte functioning leading to liver damage [7,8]. Moreover, there is growing evidence that MCs may also have reproductive and neurological effects [9,10]. Health problems occur after the ingestion of contaminated water or food, or after the absorbance of cyanotoxins through the skin during recreational activities (e.g., water sport) [7,11]. The World Health Organization (WHO) updated guideline values for MCs in drinking water (specifically for MC-LR variant—1 µg L−1) and water for recreational use (guideline value for MC-LR or total MCs—24 µg L−1) [12]. These values include the sum of all MCs in a sample [7]. However, only a limited number of MC variants as quantitative standards are available [5,13], which makes the determination of the precise value of the total MC concentration difficult. Qualitative analysis of MCs in field samples can also provide valuable data and important benefits for toxicological studies and risk assessment.
MCs are cyclic heptapeptides with the general structure of cyclo-(D-Ala1-X2-D-Masp3-Z4-Adda5-D-γ-Glu6-Mdha7), where Adda is 3S-amino-9S-methoxy-2S,6,8S-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4E,6E-dienoic acid, X and Z are variable L-amino acids, D-Masp3 is D-erythro-β-methyl-isoaspartic acid, and Mdha is N-methyldehydroalanine [14,15]. The structural modifications can occur in all seven amino acids, but they are mainly recorded in positions 2 and 4 [5,7]. The one-letter amino acid code of two residues is included in the symbols of a specific MC variant (e.g., MC-LR has leucine (L) and arginine (R) in positions 2 and 4, respectively) [5]. MCs are synthesized by the nonribosomal peptide synthetase and polyketide synthase encoded by the mcyA-J genes. The organization of the mcy cluster was resolved in the representants of the main MCs producing genera: Dolichospermum [16], Microcystis [17], and Planktothrix [18]. Mcy genes are frequently used as genetic markers for the detection, differentiation, and identification of MC producers [19,20]. McyE is responsible for Adda synthesis, as well as for the addition of D-glutamate into the MC molecule [19]. As this part of the MC structure is crucial for the activity of the compound, mcyE has been most widely used to assess the risk associated with cyanobacteria blooms [21]. Apart from general primers used for the amplification of the mcyE gene, the presence of toxic Dolichospermum, Microcystis, and Planktothrix genera in the environment has been studied with genus-specific mcyE primers [19,22].
Data on the presence of MC-producing cyanobacteria, MCs diversity (including other cyanometabolites), and their concentrations have also been reported from the Curonian Lagoon located in the southeastern part of the Baltic Sea [23,24,25,26,27]. The lagoon is a hyper-eutrophic, mainly freshwater body, connected to the Baltic Sea by the narrow Klaipėda Strait. In the lagoon, summer cyanobacteria blooms are an annual phenomenon that has been reported for several decades [28]. Most of the cyanobacteria species found in the lagoon belong to fresh–brackish water (42%) and freshwater species (37%) [29]. Aphanizomenon spp. is a dominant species in the Curonian Lagoon, co-occurring with Planktothrix agardhii, Microcystis spp., Dolichospermum/Anabaena spp., and Woronichinia spp. [23,24,28]. Dense cyanobacteria blooms are more frequently observed in the southern and central parts than in the northern part of the water body [28]. MC concentrations in the coastal southern part occasionally reach the guideline values recommended by the WHO, posing a higher risk to humans [24]. In the Russian part of the Curonian Lagoon, the MCs producing cyanobacteria have been detected using molecular methods [30,31]. In both studies, mcyE genes and cyanotoxins were associated with the presence of Microcystis species.
The aim of this work was to determine and document the diversity of MCs produced by cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon, and identify the source organisms using genus-specific primers. In order to detect and characterize the structure of 20 MC variants present in the field samples, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was applied. Genetic analysis showed that at least part of the cyanobacteria belonging to the Dolichospermum/Anabaena, Microcystis, and Planktothrix genera are MC producers.

2. Results

2.1. Cyanobacteria Community

In samples collected from the shore station of the Curonian Lagoon, cyanobacteria biomass varied from 1.17 to 12.39 mg L−1, and accounted for 3–65% of the total phytoplankton biomass (TPB) (Figure 1, Table S2). During most of the summer (27 June 2018–16 August 2018), the composition of cyanobacteria species did not differ (Figure S1), while late spring–early summer and early autumn were characterized by different communities of cyanobacteria. Dolichospermum flosaquae dominated in June (71% of the total cyanobacteria biomass (TCB)), while the contribution of Planktothrix agardhii was highest in July (2020), September–October (62–84% of the TCB).
The greatest species diversity (eight species) and the differences in relative biomass were found among members of the genus Dolichospermum (Figure 2a). Together with D. flosaquae, the dominance of D. crassum and D. planctonicum was recorded (<57% of the TB of the genus Dolichospermum) (Figure 2a, Table S2). No evident seasonal differences in the occurrence of M. flosaquae and M. wesenbergii were observed. The two species were found in all samples, and their contribution to the total biomass was similar in most of the samples (2–88% and 23–51% of the TB of the genus Microcystis, respectively) (Figure 2b). A more pronounced dominance of M. flosaquae was observed during late spring–early summer (30 May–13 June) (82–88% of the TB of the genus Microcystis). M. viridis and M. aeruginosa represented a slightly different seasonal pattern: the highest contribution of the species biomass was recorded during the middle of the summer (July–August) (26–43% and 28–61% of the TB of the genus Microcystis). Aphanizomenon genus was mainly represented by Aph. flosaquae (0–91% of the TB of the genus Aphanizomenon), together with Aph. gracile and Cuspidothrix issatschenkoi (Figure 2c). Woronichinia compacta was the dominant species among representatives of the Woronichinia genus (91–100% of the TB of the genus Woronichinia) and was present in all samples (Figure 2d).

2.2. Microcystins Diversity

In total, 20 MC variants were detected in the samples, most commonly with 2–5 different variants per sample (Table 1, Figures S3–S22). Of these, MC-RR was detected in all samples. Other frequently detected MCs were MC-LR and [Dha7]MC-RR, which were present in 11 and 7 out of 12 samples, respectively. The following variants belonged to the most rarely recorded: ([Ser1]MC-HtyR (or MC-Y(OMe)R), MC-WR (or [Ser1]MC-HarR), MC-(H4)TyrR, MC-HphR, [Asp3]MC-RY, MC-FR, MC-LW, MC-HilR, MC-LY, and [Asp3]MC-LY; they were found in only one or two samples. The abbreviations of the amino acids and their full names are provided in Table S1. The highest number of MC variants was detected during July 2018 (12 variants) and in the second half of August 2018 (18 variants).
In position 1 of the MCs produced by cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon, D-Ala was mainly present (in 16 of the 19 MCs) (Figure 3). There were also two MC structures, with m/z 1075 and m/z 1068, where the presence of Ser was suspected. The amino acid residues in position 2 were the most diverse amongst the MCs detected in the Curonian Lagoon samples. In position 2, Leu was found most frequently (7/19), followed by Arg (3/19). The other amino acid residues were present in two (Tyr) or one (Hph, Phe, Hil, Hty, Tyr(OMe), Trp, Har, (H4)Tyr, M(O2)) MC variant. Position 4 was more conserved and was occupied mainly by Arg (14/19) or optionally by Tyr (3/19), Phe (1/19), and Trp (1/19). In positions 3 and 7, methylated or dimethylated analogues of D-Asp and Dha were present, respectively. No modifications were observed in positions 5 and 6.
The collected spectra of three MCs contain fragment ions that can be generated by two different variants: [Ser1]MC-HtyR/MC-Y(OMe)R (m/z 1075) (Figure 4), MC-WR/[Ser1]MC-HarR (m/z 1068) (Figure S4), and [Asp3]MC-YR/[Asp3]MC-M(O2)R (m/z 1031) (Figure S12). These peptides differ only in positions 1 and 2. Since the total value of the two residues present in different variants is the same (e.g., Ser1+Hty2 and Ala1+Tyr(OMe)2; Ala1+Trp2 and Ser1+Har2; Ala1+Tyr2 and Ala1-M(O2)2), the fragment ions containing both residues are also the same. The encountered problems are illustrated in Figure 4, Figures S4 and S12.
MC-Y(OMe)R (II) structure elucidation was based on the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – Mdha]; 946 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 941 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 924 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 919 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 863 [Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 633 [Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 606 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 550 [Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 480 [Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 447 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 348 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]/[Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment.

2.3. Genetic Analysis

To identify the possible producers of MCs in the Curonian Lagoon, the polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed with mcyE genus-specific primers in addition to mcyE general primers. When general primers were used, the PCR products were obtained for all the environmental samples and the two MCs producing cyanobacteria strains M. aeruginosa CCNP1102 and P. aghardii CCNP1325 (Table 2). The application of Microcystis- and Planktothrix-specific primers also gave products in all the bloom samples and the relevant cyanobacteria strains. Only for the sample collected on 17 October 2019, no amplification product with Dolichospermum-specific mcyE primers was detected.
Sequences of the received PCR products were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OK500398-OK500432. Sequences obtained in amplification using Microcystis-specific primers were 100% similar and grouped with other sequences from potentially toxic M. flos-aquae, M. viridis of different origin, and one sequence from Pseudanabaena sp. CCM-UFV065 (Figure S2). Sequences received from PCRs with Planktothrix-specific primers grouped with sequences obtained from P. aghardii, P. rubescens, and one sequence from Synechococcus sp., while those obtained from Dolichospermum-specific grouped with other Dolichospermum/Anabaena sequences.

3. Discussion

In our studies, Aph. flosaquae, M. wesenbergii, and W. compacta form a significant part of the total cyanobacteria biomass [23,32]. The Aph. flosaquae population from the Curonian Lagoon, similarly to the one from the Baltic Sea, is considered non-MC producing [33]. During its blooms, no significant increases in MC concentrations and diversity were observed [23,27]. In the recent work by Österholm et al. [34], mcy genes were not detected in several analyzed Aph. flosaquae genomes. M. wesenbergii is rarely considered as an MC producer, and to date, only one work showing mcyE gene amplification from this species has been published [35]. As for the Woronichinia genus, the presence of MCs in bloom samples dominated by some species, e.g., W. naegeliana, has been occasionally recorded [36,37], but no data on toxin production by isolated W. compacta strain were published. Based on the reviewed data, we can conclude that although the biomass of Aph. flosaquae, M. wesenbergii, and W. compacta were high, these species do not contribute to the toxicity of blooms in the Curonian Lagoon.
Phytoplankton analyses of samples collected in the Curonian Lagoon showed a frequent occurrence of Dolichospermum/Anabaena, Microcystis, and Planktothrix genera among the potential producers of MCs. This was also reflected by the presence of mcyE genes amplified with primers specific for these genera. Furthermore, P. agardhii is the only species among the Planktothrix genus found in the Curonian Lagoon [23], and according to our genetic analyses, at least part of the population belongs to MC producers. Microcystis, Dolichospermum/Anabaena, and Planktothrix are frequently found in temperate zones, and usually, during their presence, different variants of MCs are detected [4,35,38,39,40,41]. However, assigning a particular MC variant to any of the cyanobacteria genera or species is impossible, especially because the study was performed with the application of field samples with a mixture of cyanobacteria species. This becomes even more complicated by the fact that one cyanobacteria strain can produce a median number of 4–5 MCs simultaneously, with one or two variants being dominant in any single strain [42,43]. However, based on the most identified associations between cyanobacteria and MCs [18,44,45,46], M. flosaquae, D. flosaquae, and P. agardhii, which were found in almost all samples, potentially can be considered as the main producers of the most frequently detected MC-RR and MC-LR and their demethylated variants ([Asp3]MC-RY, [Dha7]MC-RR, [Asp3]MC-LY, [Asp3]MC-LR).
Sensitive molecular methods, based on mcy genes, were developed to detect and identify MC producers [19,47,48]. Unfortunately, as a result of the observed mcy genes deletions, recombinations, and various insertions, the presence of the mcy genes cannot be directly linked to the synthesis of MCs. Furthermore, the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on mcy gene expression is still poorly recognized, and the knowledge about the changes in the process in given genotypes is limited [19,49]. Studies show that among tested Dolichospermum spp. (=Anabaena) (126 strains from the Baltic Sea), Planktothrix (72 strains from European lakes), and Microcystis spp. (18 strains from worldwide), only in 1–13% of the isolates mcy genes were not expressed [47,48,50]. Due to a relatively low percentage of mcy genes carrying but not expressing genera, the screening of mcy genes for the identification of potential MC producers from field samples may give a good qualitative assessment. However, as a single parameter, these genes cannot provide a clear conclusion; therefore, the application of other methods, such as mass spectrometry, must be considered for the detection of MCs.
During our study, 20 different MC variants were characterized based on fragmentation spectra. Among the MCs with a fully elucidated structure, in only two variants the presence of Ser in position 1 was considered, while in others D-Ala was present. This result is in line with previous findings that indicated position 1 as highly conserved and predominantly occupied by Ala. According to Bouaïcha et al. [51], D-Ala1 was present in 219 of the 279 identified MC variants, while only two D-Ser1-containing variants were reported. The diversity and frequency of other amino acids in specific positions of MCs from the Curonian Lagoon, as in the case of position 1, correspond to the previous structural studies of the toxins [4,51,52]. Positions 2 and 4 were most variable, while modifications in other positions were minor.
In some cases, structure elucidation based on the product ion fragmentation spectrum was found to be difficult, and could lead to misinterpretation of the spectrum. This problem can be encountered when residues with the same value are present in the peptide, e.g., Glu and Masp, Mdha and Dhb, Leu and Ile, or Tyr and Met(O2). MCs with Met(O2) can be formed during sample processing, and are considered post-extraction oxidation artifacts [53]. This fact cannot be excluded in our work, either. In addition, the sequence of two or more residues can produce the products with the same m/z value in the spectrum. The structure identification in this study was additionally hampered by the low resolution of the QTRAP5500 system (and m/z range limited to 1000). In general, structure elucidation of peptides based on fragmentation pattern, even if the mass spectrum is rich in fragment ions, might be tentative and always should be performed with caution. Moreover, in the case of new variants, the structure elucidation should be confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). However, if sufficient amounts of pure MC variants for NMR analysis cannot be isolated, the application of high-resolution mass spectrometry and accurate mass measurement can provide new data for more reliable structure elucidation.
The highest diversity of MCs was observed in samples collected on 23 July 2018 (12 variants) and 16 August 2018 (18 variants), when the contribution of cyanobacteria to TPB was one of the lowest. Compared to other studies, the diversity of MCs detected during our study is relatively higH—Yilamaz et al. [54] reported more than 36 MCs detected in Turkish lake, Ballot et al. [55] detected 41 MC variants in a dam located in South Africa, and Fastner et al. [46] reported 15 MC variants in German freshwaters. The species composition in the samples collected on 23 July 2018 and 16 August 2018 did not differ evidently from other samples collected during the period from 27 June to 30 August. The significant differences in MC profiles recorded in these samples indicate changes at the sub-population level of the cyanobacteria community. In water bodies, several cyanobacteria chemotypes characterized by different MC patterns usually coexist [56,57,58]. In the Curonian Lagoon, the environmental conditions on the two days when the highest MC structural diversity was recorded (23 July and 16 August) apparently favored the proliferation of MC-rich chemotypes, and thus, indirectly influenced the presence of numerous, including the more rare, MC variants (e.g., MC-HtyR, [Ser1]MC-RR, MC-LW, or MC-LY). Environmental conditions have an impact on the structure and dynamics of the cyanobacteria community, but not necessarily on the production of different MC variants [59,60]. Moreover, diversity can increase as a result of relaxation of the adenylation domain [50]. Recombination patterns in the adenylation domains might lead to the synthesis of new MCs [61,62]. More detailed research with isolated strains is needed to clarify the diversity of cyanobacteria chemotypes in the Curonian Lagoon.
The samples from the Curonian Lagoon also displayed diversity and considerable variation in rare and potentially new MC variants throughout the sampling period. MC variants, such as MC-WR, [Asp3]MC-RY, MC-LW, MC-LY, MC-(H4)YR, and [Asp3]MC-LY, detected during our study are mainly produced by representatives of the Microcystis genus [63,64,65,66,67]. Furthermore, MC-FR and MC-HilR were detected in the blooms dominated by several Microcystis species [68,69], while MC-HphR is associated with different strains of Anabaena [53,70]. The list of MCs detected in cyanobacteria bloom samples from the Curonian Lagoon and presented in this study adds new information that can be useful in establishing the geography of specific MC variants. Geographical differences in the distribution of specific MC variants are observed worldwide. For example, Leu1-containing MCs were detected only in Canada [71], while MC-LA is more frequently detected in the US rather than in European water bodies [72].
The identification of MC variants and their accurate quantification are very important for toxicological assessment and monitoring [73]. The following MCs: MC-LR, MC-HilR, MC-LY, MC-YR, belong to the highly toxic variants [51]. For other MCs, including the new variants, no toxicity data are available [51]. Moreover, due to the lack of reference standards, the reliable quantitative assessment of total MCs is impossible. It should be also noted that MCs are not the only harmful substances produced by cyanobacteria. There are many other classes of peptides (anabaenopeptins, cyanopeptolins, aeruginosins, etc.), which occur as frequently as MCs, and are mainly known as proteases inhibitors or compounds harmful against grazers [5]. Lack of toxicological data and comprehensive knowledge about the activity of cyanobacteria metabolites might lead to the underestimation of the real risk.

4. Conclusions

This study showed for the first time the diversity of MCs produced by cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoons. While genetic analyses indicated the potential of the cyanobacteria to produce MCs, the chemical analyses allowed us to obtain more conclusive results. The detection of 20 different MCs (among which three might be potentially new variants) adds new information about their geographical distribution and may indicate the presence of different cyanobacteria chemotypes in the lagoon.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Water Samples

Phytoplankton samples were collected from the shore of the Curonian Lagoon, located in the city of Nida (sampling site coordinates 55.300115, 22.005821) during 2018 (10 samples, every two weeks from May to September), 2019 (1 sample, October), and 2020 (1 sample, July). For DNA analysis, water samples were collected in 2018 from the surface layers (~50 cm) in sterile, darkened plastic bottles. The samples were filtered (0.5–1.0 L; the sample volume depended on the abundance of cyanobacteria) through a 0.22 µm pore size mixed cellulose ester filters (MontaMil® Membrane Filters, Frisenette ApS, Knebel, Denmark) for genetic analysis and GF/F glass fiber filters (Whatman International Ltd., Kent, UK) for MC analysis. Visually, the biomass collected on filters was similar for all samples (intensely green color).

5.2. Phytoplankton Analysis

Phytoplankton samples for microscopic analysis were taken during all sampling events and fixed with acid Lugol’s iodine solution. Quantitative analyses of the composition of the phytoplankton community were conducted using a LEICA DMI 3000 inverted microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS, Wetzlar, Germany) at magnifications of ×100 and ×400, according to the method described by Utermöhl [74]. Phytoplankton was identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level using guidelines described in the literature for the freshwater environments [75,76,77,78]. According to HELCOM recommendations [79], the phytoplankton abundance (counts L−1) was calculated by multiplying the number of units counted (filamentous cyanobacteria were counted in lengths of 100 μm as one count) with the coefficient C (L), calculated using the following equation:
C   = A   × 1000 N   × a   × V
where A is the cross-section area of the top cylinder of the combined sedimentation chamber (the usual inner diameter is 25.0 mm, giving A = 491 mm2), N is the number of counted fields or transects, a is the area of a single field or transect, and V is the volume (mL) of sedimented aliquot.
The biomass of phytoplankton (mg L−1) was calculated by the allocation of phytoplankton species (genus) to size classes, according to the scheme of Olenina et al. (2006) and updated appendix available at HELCOM website (https://helcom.fi/helcom-at-work/projects/peg/, accessed on 5 September 2021). The biomass of phytoplankton (mg L−1) was calculated based on the following equation, as recommended by HELCOM [79]:
Biomass = abundance × VCU × 10−6,
where VCU is the volume of the counting unit (µg).

5.3. DNR Extraction and PCR

DNA extraction was performed using the PowerWater® DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and FastDNATM Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) (samples collected during 2018); DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) (samples collected during 2019 and 2020). The quality and quantity of extracted DNA were determined with SpectraMax® i3 Platform (Molecular Devices LLC., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with SpectraDrop Micro-Volume Microplate. PCR products were detected by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR® Green I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). DNA isolated from toxic M. aeruginosa CCNP1102 and P. aghardii CCNP1305 were used as a positive control [57,80]. DNA isolated from Limnoraphis sp. CCNP1324, and MilliQ water were used as a negative control [81].
For amplification of the mcyE gene from all cyanobacteria present in the samples, the same primers (mcyE-F2 and mcyE-R4) (Genomed S.A., Warszawa, Poland) and PCR cycling conditions were used as in Rantala et al. [82]. MC-producing Anabaena/Dolichospermum, Microcystis, and Planktothrix spp. were targeted with the above-mentioned forward primer and genus-specific reverse primers (mcyE-12R, mcyE-R8, and mcyE-plaR3, respectively) (Genomed S.A., Warszawa, Poland) [19,83]. PCRs were run in 25 μL solution containing approx. 100 ng of DNA, 5 pmol of each specific oligonucleotide primer, 12.5 μL of MyTaq™ Red Mix (Bioline Reagents Ltd., London, UK), in Mastercycler® nexus GSX1 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
The PCR products were purified with an ExtractMe DNA clean-up kit (Blirt S.A., Gdańsk, Poland). The PCR fragments were sequenced (Genomed S.A., Warszawa, Poland) using both forward and reverse genus-specific primers used in the amplification. The obtained nucleotide sequences were edited with Chromas Lite 2.1, aligned and assembled, and afterward compared to the sequences in the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using blast algorithm (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). They were deposited under OK500398–OK500432 accession numbers. For phylogenetic analyses, the sequences were aligned using the MEGA version X [84], the alignments were corrected manually. Neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed in MEGA version X. For each tree, a bootstrap analysis of 1000 replications was performed.

5.4. Microcystins Analysis

The collected material was extracted with 75% methanol. Filters were sonicated with an ultrasonic disrupter (1 min) (HD 2070 Sonopuls, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany), then in the water bath (15 min) (Sonorex, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany), and centrifuged (12,000 g; 15 min) (Eppendorf 5810R, Hamburg, Germany). The extracts were analyzed using an Agilent HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldboronn, Germany) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer QTRAP LC-MS/MS (QTRAP5500, Applied Biosystems, Sciex; Toronto, ON, Canada), according to the method described by Mazur-Marzec et al. [85]. The presence of MCs was screened using information dependent acquisition (limit of detection was 0.5–2.0 ng mL−1, depending on the variant). Data were processed with Analyst QS (Version 1.5.1, Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies, Concord, ON, Canada, 2008).

5.5. Statistical Analysis

Non-parametric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) based on the Bray–Curtis similarity coefficient [86] was used to represent the similarities of dominating cyanobacteria communities among the different samples. The stress values of the two MDS plots were determined—a stress value of <0.2 indicated an accurate representation of similarity rankings. nMDS was conducted using Primer v6 software (PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UK).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins13120838/s1, Table S1: The abbreviations of amino acids and their full names, Table S2: Presence and dominance of cyanobacteria species in the samples from the Curonian Lagoon. Cyanobacteria dominance was expressed as a percentage of total cyanobacteria biomass, Figure S1: nMDS plot based on Bray–Curtis similarity matrix of dominating cyanobacteria species biomass. Only samples for which concentrations of microcystins were calculated in µg L−1 were used for RDA analysis, Figure S2: Phylogenetic relationships of sequences retrieved from the studied environmental samples (marked in colors), their closest relatives and representants of other potent microcystin producing genera, based on the alignment of partial (218 b) mcyE sequences. Numbers above branches indicate the bootstrap values for NJ and ML method. Accession numbers in NCBI are presented in brackets, Figure S3: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Ser1]MC-HtyR (m/z 1075) and the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – Mdha]; 946 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 941 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 924 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 919 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 863 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 633 [Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 606 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 550 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 463 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]/[Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 348 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]/[Mdha + Ser + Hty + H]; 307 [Hty + Masp + H]; 300 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; or enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-Y(OMe)R (m/z 1075), and the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – Mdha]; 946 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 941 [M+H – Adda fragment]; 924 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 919 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 863 [Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 633 [Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 606 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 550 [Ala + Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 480 [Tyr(OMe) + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 447 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 348 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]/[Mdha + Ala + Tyr(OMe) + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S4: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-WR (m/z 1068) and the following fragment ions: m/z 997 [M + H – Ala]; 985 [M + H – Mdha]; 939 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 934 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 917 [M + H – Adda fragment – H2O]; 912 [M + H – Adda]; 856 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 811 [M + H – (Ala + Trp)]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 626 [Mdha + Ala + Trp + Masp + Arg + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 582 [Agr + Adda + Glu + H – NH3]; 571 [Masp + Arg + Adda + H – CO]/[Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 543 [Ala + Trp + Masp + Arg + H]; 526 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 472 [Trp + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 456 [Trp + Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 341 [Mdha + Ala + Trp + H]; 269 [Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 258 [Ala + Trp + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 135 Adda fragment; or enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Ser1]MC-HarR (m/z 1068), and the following fragment ions: m/z 997 [M + H – Ala]; 985 [M + H – Mdha]; 939 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 934 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 917 [M + H – Adda fragment – H2O]; 912 [M + H – Adda]; 856 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 811 [M + H – (Ser + Har)]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 626 [Mdha + Ser + Har + Masp + Arg + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 582 [Agr + Adda + Glu + H – NH3]; 571 [Masp + Arg + Adda + H – CO]/[Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 543 [Ser + Har + Masp + Arg + H]; 526 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 456 [Har + Masp + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 341 [Mdha + Ser + Har + H]; 300 [Har + Masp + H]/[Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]; 258 [Ser + Har + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S5: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the partially elucidated structure MC-XR (m/z 1057) and the following fragment ions: 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S6: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin m/z 1054/528, Figure S7: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-(H4)YR (m/z 1049) and the following fragment ions: m/z 978 [M + H – Ala]; 965 [M + H – Mdha]; 920 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 893 [M + H – Arg]; 753 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 725 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – CO]; 710 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H – H2O]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 624 [Mdha + Ala + (H4)Tyr + Masp + Arg + NH3 + H]; 607 [Mdha + Ala + (H4)Tyr + Masp + Arg + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 589 [M + H – (Adda + Glu) – H2O]; 582 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – NH3]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 523 [Ala + (H4)Tyr + Masp + Arg + H]; 495 [Ala + (H4)Tyr + Masp + Arg + H – CO]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 418 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – CO]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 284 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 155 [Mdha + Ala + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S8: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-YR (m/z 1045) and the following fragment ions: m/z 974 [M + H – Ala]; 962 [M + H – Mdha]; 916 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 889 [M + H – Arg]; 834 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 760 [M + H – (Masp + Arg)]; 683 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H – NH3 – CO]; 603 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 576 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr + Masp + H]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 520 [Ala + Tyr + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 448 [Tyr + Masp + Arg + H]; 432 [Tyr + Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [Adda fragmen + Glu + Mdha + H – NH3 – CO]; 303 [Masp + Arg – NH3]; 269 [Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment, 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S9: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-HphR (m/z 1043) and the following fragment ions: m/z 972 [M + H – Ala]; 909 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 892 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Hph + MeAsp + Arg + H]; 887 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [M + H – Hph]; 831 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 602 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 574 [M + H – (Adda + Arg)]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 518 [Ala + Hph + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S10: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-RR (m/z 1038/519) and the following fragment ions: m/z 910 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 887 [M + H – Arg]; 884 [M + H – (Mdha + Ala)]; 826 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 811 [M + H – (Ala + Arg)]; 755 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha + Ala)]; 731 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + Masp + H]; 702 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + Masp + H – CO]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 579 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – H2O]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 440 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 311 [Mdha + Ala + Arg + H]; 285 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S11: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Asp3]MC-RY (m/z 1031/516) and the following fragment ions: m/z 960 [M + H – Ala]; 916 [M + H – Asp]; 897 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 880 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + Asp + Tyr + H]; 868 [M + H – Tyr]; 819 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 760 [M + H – (Arg + Asp)]; 753 [M + H – (Tyr + Asp)]; 735 [M + H – (Tyr + Asp) – H2O]; 717 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + Asp + H]; 606 [Tyr + Adda + Glu + H]; 602 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Arg + H]; 589 [Mdha + Ala + Arg + Asp + Tyr + H]; 555 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 435 [Arg + Asp + Tyr + H]; 426 [Mdha + Ala + Arg + Asp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 343 [Ala + Arg + Asp + H]; 311 [Mdha + Ala + Arg + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S12: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Asp3]MC-YR or [Asp3]MC-M(O2)R (m/z 1031/516) and the following fragment ions: m/z 960 [M + H – Ala]; 902 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 897 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 880 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr/M(O2) + Asp + Arg + H]; 868 [M + H – Tyr/M(O2)]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 589 [Mdha + Ala + Tyr/M(O2) + Asp + Arg + H]; 585 [Asp + Arg + Adda + H]; 562 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Tyr/M(O2) + Asp + H]; 506 [Ala + Tyr/M(O2) + Asp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 435 [Tyr/M(O2) + Asp + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 357 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 318 [Mdha + Ala + Tyr/M(O2) + H]; 213 [Glu + MeDha + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S13: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-FR (m/z 1029) and the following fragment ions: m/z 957 [M + H – Ala]; 946 [M + H – Mdha]; 900 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 895 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 878 [M + H – Glu/Masp – H2O]; 817 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 604 [M + H – (Adda + Glu) + NH3]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 587 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 560 [M + H – (Arg + Adda)]; 504 [Ala + Phe + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 433 [Phe + Masp + Arg + H]; 431 [Mdha + Ala + Phe + Masp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 356 [Ala + Phe + Masp + H]; 348 [Ala + Phe + Masp + H]; 302 [Mdha + Ala + Phe + H]; 284 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO]; 120 Phe immonium ion, Figure S14: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-LW (m/z 1025) and the following fragment ions: m/z 976 [M + H – CH3OH – NH3]; 925 [M + H – Mdha – NH3]; 891 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 873 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + Trp + H]; 693 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H – NH3]; 583 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 580 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – NH3]; 565 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + Trp + H – H2O]; 559 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H]; 555 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + Trp + H – CO]; 509 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + H – NH3]; 500 [Ala + Leu + Masp + Trp + H]; 472 [Ala + Leu + Masp + Trp + H – CO]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 429 [Leu + Masp + Trp + H]; 397 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 316 [Trp + Masp + H]; 298 [Trp + Masp + H – H2O]; 288 [Trp + Masp + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 187 [Trp + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 159 Trp immonium ion; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S15: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Dha7]MC-RR (m/z 1024/512) and the following fragment ions: m/z 890 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 872 [M + H – Adda fragment – H2O]; 717 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + Ala + Arg + Masp + H]; 668 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Dha + H]; 588 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + Ala + Arg + H]; 582 [Dha + Ala + Arg + Masp + Arg + H]; 565 [Dha + Ala + Arg + Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 426 [Glu + Dha + Ala + Arg + H]; 297 [Dha + Ala + Arg + H]; 269 [Dha + Ala + Arg + H – CO]; 199 [Glu + Dha + H]; 181 [Glu + Dha + H – H2O]; 141 [Dha + Ala + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 113 [Dha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S16: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-HilR (m/z 1009) and the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – NH3]; 938 [M + H – Ala]; 926 [M + H – Mdha]; 880 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 875 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 858 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Hil + Masp + Arg + H]; 853 [M + H – Arg]; 797 [M + H - (Glu + Mdha)]; 753 [M + H – (Hil + Masp); 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 584 [Mdha + Ala + Hil + Masp + Arg + H + NH3]; 573 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Hil + H]; 567 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 540 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Hil + Masp + H]; 484 [Ala + Hil + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 412 [Hil + Masp + Arg + H]; 396 [Hil + Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S17: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-LY (m/z 1002) and the following fragment ions: m/z 985 [M + H – NH3]; 902 [M + H – Mdha – NH3]; 868 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 851 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + Tyr + H]; 818 [M + H – (Ala + Leu)]; 693 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H – NH3]; 580 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – NH3]; 560 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 559 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H]; 509 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + H – NH3]; 477 [Tyr + Adda + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 406 [Leu + Masp + Tyr + H]; 397 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 293 [Masp + Tyr + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 155 [Mdha + Ala + H]; 136 Tyr immonium ion; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO]; 86 Ile immonium ion, Figure S18: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-LR (m/z 995) and the following fragment ions: m/z 977 [M + H – H2O]; 967 [M + H – CO]; 924 [M + H – Ala]; 912 [M + H – Mdha]; 866 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 839 [M + H – Arg]; 783 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha)]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 712 [M + H – (Glu + Mdha + Ala)]; 682 [M + H – (Ala + Leu + Masp)]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 553 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 526 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 453 [Ala + Leu + Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 397 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 269 [Masp + Arg + H – NH3]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S19: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Asp3]MC-LY (m/z 988) and the following fragment ions: m/z 854 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 837 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + Asp + Tyr + H]; 580 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – NH3]; 546 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 477 [Tyr + Adda + H]; 463 [Ala + Leu + Asp + Tyr + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 383 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Asp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 266 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – H2O]; 251 [Asp + Tyr + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment, Figure S20: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure MC-LF (m/z 986) and the following fragment ions: m/z 969 [M + H – NH3]; 857 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 852 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 802 [M + H – (Ala + Leu)]; 693 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H – NH3]; 580 [Adda + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H – NH3]; 559 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H]; 544 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 509 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + Masp + H – NH3]; 461 [Ala + Leu + Masp + Phe + H]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 397 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H]; 390 [Leu + Masp + Phe + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 249 [Masp + Phe + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment; 127 [Mdha + Ala + H – CO], Figure S21: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Asp3]MCLR (m/z 981) and the following fragment ions: m/z 910 [M + H – Ala]; 847 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 830 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + Asp + Arg + H]; 753 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 668 [M + H – Adda]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 539 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 456 [M + H – (Adda + Glu + Mdha)]; 446 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ala + H]; 383 [Mdha + Ala + Leu + Asp + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 369 [Glu + Mdha + Ala + Leu + H – CO]; 347 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 195 [Glu + Mdha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O+H]; 135 Adda fragment; 105 Dha, Figure S22: Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of microcystin with the suggested structure [Dha7]MCLR (m/z 981) and the following fragment ions: m/z 910 [M + H – Ala]; 852 [M + H – Glu/Mdha]; 830 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + Ala + Leu + Masp + Arg + H]; 825 [M + H – Arg]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 712 [Leu + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 583 [Adda + Glu + Dha + Ala + H]; 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO]; 539 [M + H – (Adda + Glu)]; 512 [Adda + Glu + Dha + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 432 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + Ala + H]; 399 [Leu + Masp + Arg + H]; 383 [Glu + Dha + Ala + Leu + H]; 361 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + H]; 334 [C11H14O + Glu + Dha + H – CO]; 269 [Glu + Dha + Ala + H]; 181 [Glu + Dha + H – H2O]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 141 [Dha + Ala + H]; 135 Adda fragment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.-M., A.T.-S., D.O.; methodology, H.M.-M., A.T.-S. and D.O.; formal analysis, D.O.; investigation, D.O., H.M.-M., A.T.-S., M.K. and G.G.; resources, R.P., H.M.-M. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.O.; writing—review and editing, H.M.-M., A.T.-S., M.K., R.P. and G.G.; visualization, D.O. and A.T.-S.; supervision, H.M.-M., A.T.-S. and R.P.; funding acquisition, R.P., H.M.-M. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by Lithuanian National Science Foundation, grant number S-MIP-20–31. This work was also supported by the Doctorate Study program in Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University (for D.O.) and a statutory program of the University of Gdańsk (grant No. DS/D531-G260-D424–19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank the journal editor and all the reviewers for their valuable comments. We thank Marta Cegłowska for assistance in editing this text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Watson, S.B.; Whitton, B.A.; Higgins, S.N.; Paerl, H.W.; Brooks, B.W.; Wehr, J.D. Harmful Algal Blooms. In Freshwater Algae of North America; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 873–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Svirčev, Z.; Lalić, D.; Bojadžija Savić, G.; Tokodi, N.; Drobac Backović, D.; Chen, L.; Meriluoto, J.; Codd, G.A. Global Geographical and Historical Overview of Cyanotoxin Distribution and Cyanobacterial Poisonings. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 2429–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Demay, J.; Bernard, C.; Reinhardt, A.; Marie, B. Natural Products from Cyanobacteria: Focus on Beneficial Activities. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Jones, M.R.; Pinto, E.; Torres, M.A.; Dörr, F.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Szubert, K.; Tartaglione, L.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Miles, C.O.; Beach, D.G.; et al. CyanoMetDB, a Comprehensive Public Database of Secondary Metabolites from Cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2021, 196, 117017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Janssen, E.M.L. Cyanobacterial Peptides beyond Microcystins—A Review on Co-Occurrence, Toxicity, and Challenges for Risk Assessment. Water Res. 2019, 151, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miles, O.C.; Stirling, D. Toxin Mass List, Version 15b [Data Set]. Available online: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15794.50889 (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  7. Chorus, I.; Welker, M. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Machado, J.; Azevedo, J.; Vasconcelos, V.; Campos, A.; Machado, J.; Azevedo, J.; Campos, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Cyanobacterial Toxins and Corresponding Chemical Variants. In Microbial Toxins. Toxinology; Gopalakrishnakone, P., Stiles, B., Alape-Giron, A., Dubreuil, J., Mandal, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 441–464. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lone, Y.; Koiri, R.K.; Bhide, M. An Overview of the Toxic Effect of Potential Human Carcinogen Microcystin-LR on Testis. Toxicol. Rep. 2015, 2, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hinojosa, M.G.; Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Prieto, A.I.; Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Jos, A.; Cameán, A.M. Neurotoxicity Induced by Microcystins and Cylindrospermopsin: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 668, 547–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kubickova, B.; Babica, P.; Hilscherová, K.; Šindlerová, L. Effects of Cyanobacterial Toxins on the Human Gastrointestinal Tract and the Mucosal Innate Immune System. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2019, 31, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. World Health Organization. Cyanobacterial Toxins: Microcystins Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality and Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/338066 (accessed on 17 November 2021).
  13. Meriluoto, J.; Blaha, L.; Bojadzija, G.; Bormans, M.; Brient, L.; Codd, G.A.; Drobac, D.; Faassen, E.J.; Fastner, J.; Hiskia, A.; et al. Toxic Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in European Waters—Recent Progress Achieved through the CYANOCOST Action and Challenges for Further Research. Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 2017, 8, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Botes, D.P.; Tuinman, A.A.; Wessels, P.L.; Viljoen, C.C.; Kruger, H.; Williams, D.H.; Santikarn, S.; Smith, R.J.; Hammond, S.J. The Structure of Cyanoginosin-LA, a Cyclic Heptapeptide Toxin from the Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1984, 1, 2311–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Santikarn, S.; Williams, D.H.; Smith, R.J.; Hammond, S.J.; Botes, D.P.; Tuinman, A.; Wessels, P.L.; Viljoen, C.C.; Kruger, H. A Partial Structure for the Toxin BE-4 from the Blue-Green Algae, Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 12, 652–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rouhiainen, L.; Vakkilainen, T.; Siemer, B.L.; Buikema, W.; Haselkorn, R.; Sivonen, K. Genes Coding for Hepatotoxic Heptapeptides (Microcystins) in the Cyanobacterium Anabaena Strain 90. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tillett, D.; Dittmann, E.; Erhard, M.; von Döhren, H.; Börner, T.; Neilan, B.A. Structural Organization of Microcystin Biosynthesis in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806: An Integrated Peptide-Polyketide Synthetase System. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Christiansen, G.; Fastner, J.; Erhard, M.; Börner, T.; Dittmann, E. Microcystin Biosynthesis in Planktothrix: Genes, Evolution, and Manipulation. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Rantala, A.; Rajaniemi-Wacklin, P.; Lyra, C.; Lepistö, L.; Rintala, J.; Mankiewicz-Boczek, J.; Sivonen, K. Detection of Microcystin-Producing Cyanobacteria in Finnish Lakes with Genus-Specific Microcystin Synthetase Gene E (McyE) PCR and Associations with Environmental Factors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 6101–6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sipari, H.; Rantala-Ylinen, A.; Jokela, J.; Oksanen, I.; Sivonen, K. Development of a Chip Assay and Quantitative PCR for Detecting Microcystin Synthetase e Gene Expressions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3797–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ngwa, F.F.; Madramootoo, C.A.; Jabaji, S. Comparison of Cyanobacterial Microcystin Synthetase (Mcy) E Gene Transcript Levels, Mcy E Gene Copies, and Biomass as Indicators of Microcystin Risk under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Microbiol. Open 2014, 3, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vareli, K.; Briasoulis, E.; Pilidis, G.; Sainis, I. Molecular confirmation of Planktothrix rubescens as the cause of intense, microcystin-Synthesizing cyanobacterial bloom in Lake Ziros, Greece. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pilkaitytė, R.; Overlingė, D.; Gasiūnaitė, Z.R.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Spatial and Temporal Diversity of Cyanometabolites in the Eutrophic Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea). Water 2021, 13, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Overlingė, D.; Kataržytė, M.; Vaičiūtė, D.; Gyraite, G.; Gečaitė, I.; Jonikaitė, E.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Are There Concerns Regarding CHAB in Coastal Bathing Waters Affected by Freshwater-Brackish Continuum? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020, 159, 111500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Overlingė, D.; Toruńska-sitarz, A.; Cegłowska, M.; Błaszczyk, A.; Szubert, K.; Pilkaitytė, R.; Mazur-marzec, H. Phytoplankton of the Curonian Lagoon as a New Interesting Source for Bioactive Natural Products. Special Impact on Cyanobacterial Metabolites. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smirnova, M.M. Presence of Microcystins in the Littoral Zone of the Curonian Lagoon by the Data of Immunochromatographic Analysis in 2017. Mar. Biol. J. 2019, 4, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Paldavičienė, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Razinkovas, A. Toxic Cyanobacteria Blooms in the Lithuanian Part of the Curonian Lagoon. Oceanologia 2009, 51, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vaičiūtė, D.; Bučas, M.; Bresciani, M.; Dabulevičienė, T.; Gintauskas, J.; Mėžinė, J.; Tiškus, E.; Umgiesser, G.; Morkūnas, J.; de Santi, F.; et al. Hot Moments and Hotspots of Cyanobacteria Hyperblooms in the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea) Revealed via Remote Sensing-Based Retrospective Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 769, 145053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olenina, I. Long-Term Changes in the Kuršių Marios Lagoon: Eutrophication and Phytoplankton Response. Ekologija 1998, 1, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  30. Belykh, O.I.; Dmitrieva, O.A.; Gladkikh, A.S.; Sorokovikova, E.G. Identification of Toxigenic Cyanobacteria of the Genus Microcystis in the Curonian Lagoon (Baltic Sea). Oceanology 2013, 53, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Semenova, A.S.; Sidelev, S.I.; Dmitrieva, O.A. Experimental Investigation of Natural Populations of Daphnia galeata G.O. Sars from the Curonian Lagoon Feeding on Potentially Toxigenic Cyanobacteria. Biol. Bull. 2017, 44, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lange, E.K. Structure and Spatial Distribution of Winter Phytoplankton of the Curonian Lagoon (Baltic Sea). Ekologija 2011, 57, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Šulčius, S.; Pilkaityte, R.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; KasperovičienE, J.; Ezhova, E.; Błaszczyk, A.; Paškauskas, R. Increased Risk of Exposure to Microcystins in the Scum of the Filamentous Cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae Accumulated on the Western Shoreline of the Curonian Lagoon. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 99, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Österholm, J.; Popin, R.V.; Fewer, D.P.; Sivonen, K. Phylogenomic Analysis of Secondary Metabolism in the Toxic Cyanobacterial Genera Anabaena, Dolichospermum and Aphanizomenon. Toxins 2020, 12, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Stefanova, K.; Descy, J.P.; Uzunov, B.; Radkova, M.; Pavlova, V.; Mitreva, M.; Gärtner, G. Microcystis aeruginosa and M. wesenbergii Were the Primary Planktonic Microcystin Producers in Several Bulgarian Waterbodies (August 2019). Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oberholster, P.; Botha, A.-M.; Grobbelaar, J. Microcystis Aeruginosa: Source of Toxic Microcystins in Drinking Water. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bober, B.; Lechowski, Z.; Bialczyk, J. Determination of Some Cyanopeptides Synthesized by Woronichinia naegeliana (Chroococcales, Cyanophyceae). Phycol. Res. 2011, 59, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Samdal, I.A.; Strand, D.A.; Ballot, A.; Rusch, J.C.; Haande, S.; Løvberg, K.L.E.; Miles, C.O.; Vralstad, T. Microcystins in European Noble Crayfish Astacus Astacus in Lake Steinsfjorden, a Planktothrix-Dominated Lake. Toxins 2020, 12, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bormans, M.; Savar, V.; Legrand, B.; Mineaud, E.; Robert, E.; Lance, E.; Amzil, Z. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Estuarine Water and Sediment. Aquat. Ecol. 2020, 54, 625–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chernova, E.; Sidelev, S.; Russkikh, I.; Voyakina, E.; Zhakovskaya, Z. First Observation of Microcystin- and Anatoxin-a-Producing Cyanobacteria in the Easternmost Part of the Gulf of Finland (the Baltic Sea). Toxicon 2019, 157, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Toporowska, M.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Pawlik-Skowrońska, B. The Effects of Cyanobacterial Bloom Extracts on the Biomass, Chl-a, MC and Other Oligopeptides Contents in a Natural Planktothrix agardhii Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sivonen, K.; Jones, G.J. Cyanobacterial Toxins. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring, and Management; Chorus, I., Bartram, J., Eds.; E & FN Spon: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  43. Puddick, J.; Prinsep, M.R.; Wood, S.A.; Kaufononga, S.A.F.; Cary, S.C.; Hamilton, D.P. High Levels of Structural Diversity Observed in Microcystins from Microcystis CAWBG11 and Characterization of Six New Microcystin Congeners. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 5372–5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Major, Y.; Kifle, D.; Spoof, L.; Meriluoto, J. Cyanobacteria and Microcystins in Koka Reservoir (Ethiopia). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 26861–26873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Turner, A.D.; Dhanji-Rapkova, M.; O’Neill, A.; Coates, L.; Lewis, A.; Lewis, K. Analysis of Microcystins in Cyanobacterial Blooms from Freshwater Bodies in England. Toxins 2018, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fastner, J.; Erhard, M.; Carmichael, W.W.; Sun, F.; Rinehart, K.L.; Rönicke, H.; Chorus, I. Characterization and Diversity of microcystins in Natural Blooms and Strains of the Genera and Planktothrix from German Freshwaters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1999, 145, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kurmayer, R.; Christiansen, G.; Fastner, J.; Börner, T. Abundance of Active and Inactive Microcystin Genotypes in Populations of the Toxic Cyanobacterium Planktothrix spp. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fewer, D.P.; Halinen, K.; Sipari, H.; Bernardová, K.; Mänttäri, M.; Eronen, E.; Sivonen, K. Non-Autonomous Transposable Elements Associated with Inactivation of Microcystin Gene Clusters in Strains of the Genus Anabaena Isolated from the Baltic Sea. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wood, S.A.; Rueckert, A.; Hamilton, D.P.; Cary, S.C.; Dietrich, D.R. Switching Toxin Production on and off: Intermittent Microcystin Synthesis in a Microcystis Bloom. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2011, 3, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mikalsen, B.; Boison, G.; Skulberg, O.M.; Fastner, J.; Davies, W.; Gabrielsen, T.M.; Rudi, K.; Jakobsen, K.S. Natural Variation in the Microcystin Synthetase Operon McyABC and Impact on Microcystin Production in Microcystis Strains. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 2774–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bouaïcha, N.; Miles, C.O.; Beach, D.G.; Labidi, Z.; Djabri, A.; Yasmine Benayache, N.; Nguyen-Quang, T.; Chadli Bendjedid, U.; Taref, E. Structural Diversity, Characterization and Toxicology of Microcystins. Toxins 2019, 11, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Spoof, L.; Catherine, A. Tables of Microcystins and Nodularins. In Hanbook of Cyanobacterial Monitoring and Cyanotoxin Analysis; Meriluoto, J., Spoof, L., Codd, A.G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2017; pp. 526–537. [Google Scholar]
  53. Miles, C.O.; Melanson, J.E.; Ballot, A. Sulfide Oxidations for LC-MS Analysis of Methionine-Containing Microcystins in Dolichospermum flos-aquae NIVA-CYA 656. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 13307–13315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yilmaz, M.; Foss, A.J.; Miles, C.O.; Özen, M.; Demir, N.; Balcı, M.; Beach, D.G. Comprehensive Multi-Technique Approach Reveals the High Diversity of Microcystins in Field Collections and an Associated Isolate of Microcystis aeruginosa from a Turkish Lake. Toxicon Off. J. Int. Soc. Toxinol. 2019, 167, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ballot, A.; Sandvik, M.; Rundberget, T.; Botha, C.J.; Miles, C.O.; Ballot, A.; Sandvik, M.; Rundberget, T.; Botha, C.J.; Miles, C.O. Diversity of Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Hartbeespoort Dam, South Africa. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2013, 65, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Johansson, E.; Legrand, C.; Björnerås, C.; Godhe, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Säll, T.; Rengefors, K. High Diversity of Microcystin Chemotypes within a Summer Bloom of the Cyanobacterium Microcystis botrys. Toxins 2019, 11, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Grabowska, M.; Kobos, J.; Toruńska-Sitarz, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Non-Ribosomal Peptides Produced by Planktothrix agardhii from Siemianówka Dam Reservoir SDR (Northeast Poland). Arch. Microbiol. 2014, 196, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Rohrlack, T.; Skulberg, R.; Skulberg, O.M. Distribution of Oligopeptide Chemotypes of the Cyanobacterium Planktothrix and Their Persistence in Selected Lakes in Fennoscandia. J. Phycol. 2009, 45, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xie, L.; Rediske, R.R.; Gillett, N.D.; O’Keefe, J.P.; Scull, B.; Xue, Q. The Impact of Environmental Parameters on Microcystin Production in Dialysis Bag Experiments. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Neilan, B.A.; Pearson, L.A.; Muenchhoff, J.; Moffitt, M.C.; Dittmann, E. Environmental Conditions That Influence Toxin Biosynthesis in Cyanobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1239–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shishido, T.K.; Kaasalainen, U.; Fewer, D.P.; Rouhiainen, L.; Jokela, J.; Wahlsten, M.; Fiore, M.F.; Yunes, J.S.; Rikkinen, J.; Sivonen, K. Convergent Evolution of [D-Leucine1] Microcystin-LR in Taxonomically Disparate Cyanobacteria. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Fewer, D.P.; Rouhiainen, L.; Jokela, J.; Wahlsten, M.; Laakso, K.; Wang, H.; Sivonen, K. Recurrent Adenylation Domain Replacement in the Microcystin Synthetase Gene Cluster. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Christiansen, G.; Yoshida, W.Y.; Blom, J.F.; Portmann, C.; Gademann, K.; Hemscheidt, T.; Kurmayer, R. Isolation and Structure Determination of Two Microcystins and Sequence Comparison of the McyABC Adenylation Domains in Planktothrix Species. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Miles, C.O.; Sandvik, M.; Nonga, H.E.; Rundberget, T.; Wilkins, A.L.; Rise, F.; Ballot, A. Thiol Derivatization for LC-MS Identification of Microcystins in Complex Matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 8937–8944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Bateman, K.P.; Thibault, P.; Douglas, D.J.; White, R.L. Mass Spectral Analyses of Microcystins from Toxic Cyanobacteria Using On-Line Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Separations. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 712, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Del Campo, F.F.; Ouahid, Y. Identification of Microcystins from Three Collection Strains of Microcystis aeruginosa. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2906–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Diehnelt, C.W.; Dugan, N.R.; Peterman, S.M.; Budde, W.L. Identification of Microcystin Toxins from a Strain of Microcystis aeruginosa by Liquid Chromatography Introduction into a Hybrid Linear Ion Trap-Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Namikoshi, M.; Rinehart, K.L.; Sakai, R.; Stotts, R.R.; Dahlem, A.M.; Beasley, V.R.; Carmichael, W.W.; Evans, W.R. Identification of 12 Hepatotoxins from a Homer Lake Bloom of the Cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa, Microcystis viridis, and Microcystis wesenbergii: Nine New Microcystins. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Namikoshi, M.; Sun, F.; Choi, B.W.; Rinehart, K.L.; Carmichael, W.W.; Evans, W.R.; Beasley, V.R. Seven More Microcystins from Homer Lake Cells: Application of the General Method for Structure Assignment of Peptides Containing α, β-Dehydroamino Acid Unit(s). J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3671–3679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fewer, D.P.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; Jokela, J.; Wahlsten, M.; Rouhiainen, L.; Kristensen, T.; Rohrlack, T.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Sivonen, K. Natural Occurrence of Microcystin Synthetase Deletion Mutants Capable of Producing Microcystins in Strains of the Genus Anabaena (Cyanobacteria). Microbiology 2008, 154, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. LeBlanc, P.; Merkley, N.; Thomas, K.; Lewis, N.I.; Békri, K.; Renaud, S.L.B.; Pick, F.R.; McCarron, P.; Miles, C.O.; Quilliam, M.A. Isolation and Characterization of [D-Leu1]Microcystin-LY from Microcystis aeruginosa CPCC-464. Toxins 2020, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Pick, F.R. Blooming Algae: A Canadian Perspective on the Rise of Toxic Cyanobacteria. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016, 73, 1149–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bortoli, S.; Volmer, D.A. Account: Characterization and Identification of Microcystins by Mass Spectrometry. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 20, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Utermöhl, H. Zur Vervollkommnung Der Quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. SIL Commun. 1958, 9, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Starmach, K. Dinophyceae—Dinofity. Raphidophyceae—Rafidofity. In Flora slodkowodna Polski 5; Starmach, K., Sieminska, J., Eds.; PWN: Warszawa, Poland; Krakow, Poland, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  76. Tikkanen, T.; Willen, T. Vaxtplanktonflora; Statens Naturvardsverk: Solna, Sweden, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  77. Komárek, J.; Anganostidis, K. Cyanoprokaryota. In Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Büdel, B., Gärtner, G., Krienitz, L., Schagerl, M., Eds.; Elsevier: München, Germany, 2008; Volume 19/1. [Google Scholar]
  78. Komárek, J. Cyanoprokaryota: 3rd Part: Heterocystous Genera. In Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Büdel, B., Gärtner, G., Krienitz, L., Schagerl, M., Eds.; Springer Spektrum: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  79. HELCOM. Manual of Marine Monitoring in the Combine Programme of HELCOM. Annex C-6: Guidelines Concerning Phytoplankton Species Composition, Abundance and Biomass. Available online: https://helcom.fi/media/publications/Manual-for-Marine-Monitoring-in-the-COMBINE-Programme-of-HELCOM.pdf (accessed on 11 June 2021).
  80. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Browarczyk-Matusiak, G.; Forycka, K.; Kobos, J.; Pliński, M. Morphological, Genetic, Chemical and Ecophysiological Characterisation of Two Microcystis aeruginosa Isolates from the Vistula Lagoon, Southern Baltic. Oceanologia 2010, 52, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cegłowska, M.; Szubert, K.; Wieczerzak, E.; Kosakowska, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Eighteen New Aeruginosamide Variants Produced by the Baltic Cyanobacterium Limnoraphis CCNP1324. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rantala, A.; Fewer, D.P.; Hisbergues, M.; Rouhiainen, L.; Vaitomaa, J.; Börner, T.; Sivonen, K. Phylogenetic Evidence for the Early Evolution of Microcystin Synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Vaitomaa, J.; Rantala, A.; Halinen, K.; Rouhiainen, L.; Tallberg, P.; Mokelke, L.; Sivonen, K. Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Determination of Microcystin Synthetase E Copy Numbers for Microcystis and Anabaena in Lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7289–7297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Błaszczyk, A.; Felczykowska, A.; Hohlfeld, N.; Kobos, J.; Toruńska-Sitarz, A.; Devi, P.; Montalvão, S.; D’souza, L.; Tammela, P.; et al. Baltic Cyanobacteria—A Source of Biologically Active Compounds. Eur. J. Phycol. 2015, 50, 343–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Bray, R.J.; Curtis, J.T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 1957, 27, 325–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 13 00838 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure and biomass (mg L−1) of the cyanobacteria community and total phytoplankton biomass (mg L−1) in the collected samples.
Figure 1. Structure and biomass (mg L−1) of the cyanobacteria community and total phytoplankton biomass (mg L−1) in the collected samples.
Toxins 13 00838 g001
Toxins 13 00838 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative biomass of dominating cyanobacteria species of the genera Dolichospermum/Anabaena (a), Microcystis (b), Aphanizomenon (c) and Woronichinia (d). Relative biomass is calculated from the total biomass of specific genera.
Figure 2. Relative biomass of dominating cyanobacteria species of the genera Dolichospermum/Anabaena (a), Microcystis (b), Aphanizomenon (c) and Woronichinia (d). Relative biomass is calculated from the total biomass of specific genera.
Toxins 13 00838 g002
Toxins 13 00838 g003 550
Figure 3. A general structure of MCs and their structural diversity recorded in the samples from the Curonian Lagoon (R1 = CH3 or CH2OH; R2 = H or CH3; R3 = H or CH3; X and Z—variable L-amino acids). * One of the possible residues. See the text in Section 2.2. The abbreviations of the amino acids and their full names are provided in Table S1.
Figure 3. A general structure of MCs and their structural diversity recorded in the samples from the Curonian Lagoon (R1 = CH3 or CH2OH; R2 = H or CH3; R3 = H or CH3; X and Z—variable L-amino acids). * One of the possible residues. See the text in Section 2.2. The abbreviations of the amino acids and their full names are provided in Table S1.
Toxins 13 00838 g003
Toxins 13 00838 g004 550
Figure 4. Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of MC with m/z 1075. The spectrum can correspond to [Ser1]MC-HtyR (I) or MC-Y(OMe)R (II). The structure elucidation of [Ser1]MC-HtyR (I) was based on the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – Mdha]; 946 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 941 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 924 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 919 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 863 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 633 [Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 606 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 550 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 463 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]/[Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 348 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]/[Mdha + Ser + Hty + H]; 307 [Hty + Masp + H]; 300 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment.
Figure 4. Enhanced product ion mass spectrum of MC with m/z 1075. The spectrum can correspond to [Ser1]MC-HtyR (I) or MC-Y(OMe)R (II). The structure elucidation of [Ser1]MC-HtyR (I) was based on the following fragment ions: m/z 992 [M + H – Mdha]; 946 [M + H – Glu/Masp]; 941 [M + H – Adda fragment]; 924 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 919 [M + H – Arg]; 882 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 863 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + Adda + H]; 728 [Masp + Arg + Adda + Glu + H]; 682 [Arg + Adda + Glu + Mdha + H]; 633 [Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 606 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + Hty + Masp + H]; 599 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H], 571 [Arg + Adda + Glu + H – CO], 550 [Ser + Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 470 [Arg + Adda + H]; 463 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]/[Hty + Masp + Arg + H]; 375 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H]; 348 [C11H14O + Glu + Mdha + H – CO]/[Mdha + Ser + Hty + H]; 307 [Hty + Masp + H]; 300 [Glu + Mdha + Ser + H]; 213 [Glu + Mdha + H]; 163 [C11H14O + H]; 135 Adda fragment.
Toxins 13 00838 g004
Table
Table 1. MC diversity in field samples collected from the Curonian Lagoon during 2018, 2019, and 2020 (“+”: detected; empty cells: not detected, m/z—values of MC pseudomolecular ions. In brackets, the value of a doubly charged ion is given).
Table 1. MC diversity in field samples collected from the Curonian Lagoon during 2018, 2019, and 2020 (“+”: detected; empty cells: not detected, m/z—values of MC pseudomolecular ions. In brackets, the value of a doubly charged ion is given).
MC Variantsm/zSampling Dates
30 May 201813 Jun 201827 Jun 201811 Jul 201823 Jul 20183 Aug 20189 Aug 201816 Aug 201830 Aug 201819 Sep 201817 Oct 20193 Jul 2020
[Ser1]MC-HtyR or MC-Y(OMe)R1075 + +
MC-WR or [Ser1]MC-HarR1068 ++
MC-X1R1057 + +
MC-?1054 +
MC-(H4)YR1049 + +
MC-YR1045+ + +++
MC-HphR1043 ++
MC-RR1038 (519)++++++++++++
[Asp3]MC-YR or
[Asp3]MC-M(O2)R		1031 + +++
[Asp3]MC-RY1031 ++
MC-FR1029 + +
MC-LW1025 +
[Dha7]MC-RR1024 (512) + + +++++
MC-HilR1009 + +
MC-LY1002 +
MC-LR995++++++ +++++
[Asp3]MC-LY988 + +
MC-LF986 + +++
[Dha7]MC-LR981 + + ++
[Asp3]MC-LR981 + ++
Note: Unknown part of MC.
Table
Table 2. The results of PCR amplification with the general mcy primers and Dolichospermum-, Microcystis-, and Planktothrix-specific primers (“+”—PCR-positive results, “−”—PCR-negative results, OK500398-OK500432—accession number in GenBank).
Table 2. The results of PCR amplification with the general mcy primers and Dolichospermum-, Microcystis-, and Planktothrix-specific primers (“+”—PCR-positive results, “−”—PCR-negative results, OK500398-OK500432—accession number in GenBank).
SamplesGeneral mcyE PrimersDolichospermum Specific PrimersMicrocystis Specific PrimersPlanktothrix Specific Primers
30 May 2018+ OK500398 OK500409 OK500421
13 Jun 2018+ OK500399 OK500410 OK500422
27 Jun 2018+ OK500400 OK500411 OK500423
11 Jul 2018+ OK500401 OK500412 OK500424
27 Jul 2018+ OK500402 OK500413 OK500425
3 Aug 2018+ OK500403 OK500414 OK500426
9 Aug 2018+ OK500404 OK500415 OK500427
16 Aug 2018+ OK500405 OK500416 OK500428
30 Aug 2018+ OK500406 OK500417 OK500429
19 Sep 2018+ OK500407 OK500418 OK500430
17 Oct 2019+− OK500419 OK500431
3 Jul 2020+ OK500408 OK500420 OK500432
M. aeruginosa CCNP1102+− OK500396 −
P. aghardii CCNP1325+−− OK500397
Limnoraphis sp. CCNP1324−−−−
MilliQ water−−−−
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Overlingė, D.; Toruńska-Sitarz, A.; Kataržytė, M.; Pilkaitytė, R.; Gyraitė, G.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Characterization and Diversity of Microcystins Produced by Cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea). Toxins 2021, 13, 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13120838

AMA Style

Overlingė D, Toruńska-Sitarz A, Kataržytė M, Pilkaitytė R, Gyraitė G, Mazur-Marzec H. Characterization and Diversity of Microcystins Produced by Cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea). Toxins. 2021; 13(12):838. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13120838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Overlingė, Donata, Anna Toruńska-Sitarz, Marija Kataržytė, Renata Pilkaitytė, Greta Gyraitė, and Hanna Mazur-Marzec. 2021. "Characterization and Diversity of Microcystins Produced by Cyanobacteria from the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea)" Toxins 13, no. 12: 838. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13120838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop