Next Article in Journal
Baculovirus Expression and Functional Analysis of Vpa2 Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis
Previous Article in Journal
High Levels of Anabaenopeptins Detected in a Cyanobacteria Bloom from N.E. Spanish Sau-Susqueda-El Pasteral Reservoirs System by LC–HRMS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective and Anti—Neuroinflammatory Effects of a Poisonous Plant Croton tiglium Linn. Extract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unexpected Toxicity of Green Tea Polyphenols in Combination with the Sambucus RIL Ebulin

by
M. Ángeles Rojo
1,†,
Manuel Garrosa
2,†,
Pilar Jiménez
3,
Tomás Girbés
3,
Verónica Garcia-Recio
4,
Manuel Cordoba-Diaz
4,5 and
Damián Cordoba-Diaz
4,5,*
1
Area of Experimental Sciences, Miguel de Cervantes European University, 47012 Valladolid, Spain
2
Area of Histology, Faculty of Medicine and INCYL, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain
3
Area of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain
4
Area of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
5
University Institute of Industrial Pharmacy (IUFI), Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxins 2020, 12(9), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090542
Submission received: 17 June 2020 / Revised: 12 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 22 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Toxins and Related Proteins: Pharmacology and Toxicology)

Abstract

:
The safety of concentrated food complements intake is a major health concern. It has been well established that green tea polyphenols (GTPs) consumption promotes healthy effects. However, the ingestion of large amounts of GTPs is a matter of controversy due to reported adverse effects. We underwent a preliminary exploration of the effects of the oral administration of a standardized concentrated GTPs preparation on mice which suffered from reversible intestinal derangement promoted by sublethal amounts of the antiribosomal lectin ebulin f from dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L.). Neither independent oral administration of 30 mg/kg body weight Polyphenon 60 nor intraperitoneal administration of 2.5 mg/kg body weight ebulin f triggered lethal toxicity. In contrast, the simultaneous administration of these same doses of both Polyphenon 60 and ebulin f triggered an important and unexpected synergistic toxic action featured by the biphasic reduction of weight, which continued after eight days, reaching a reduction of 40%. Lethality appeared 2 days after the onset of the combined treatment and reached more than 50% after 10 days.
Key Contribution: Concentrated green tea polyphenols potentiated the toxic effects promoted by ebulin f. Coadministration of food antioxidant supplement with drugs or toxins that affect the gastrointestinal tract must be avoid in order to prevent this unexpected side effect.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The benefits of green tea polyphenols consumption have been extensively studied and scientifically established [1,2,3,4]. Green tea polyphenols (GTPs) display specific beneficial effects on health and pathologies, especially in cardiovascular disorders and cancer [5,6], as well as in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), especially at low doses [7]. GTPs are highly active molecules which trigger antagonistic effects depending on the concentration used, acting as prooxidant [8] or antioxidant [6] agents. Among the most important effects described in the literature are the anti-inflammatory [9], antioxidant [10], anticancer [6,11,12,13], and antibacterial biofilm process actions [14]. The protective effect of green tea extracts against oxidative damage is related to their catechin composition [15]. Among the green tea catechins, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) has been by far the most studied. EGCG acts on targets, for instance, on very complex mechanisms like cancer through apoptosis of cancer cells [16,17]. The proapoptotic effect of EGCG can potentiate the action of drugs like sulindac, which promotes apoptosis in rat colon cells, thus leading to an improvement of the therapeutic efficiency with the reduction of aberrant crypt foci [12]. These beneficial actions of green tea polyphenols on health led to the preparation of concentrated extracts enriched in catechins, to their use as dietary supplements to increase the antioxidant status of the cells and tissues, and to their use as chemo-preventive agents [18]. However, in contrast with the absence of adverse effects at moderate and regular consumption, the uncontrolled ingestion of such concentrated extracts of polyphenols could trigger adverse effects, such as those recently reviewed [19,20]. In fact, controversial results have been obtained which seem to be dependent on the animal species, gender, age, and green tea preparation [21,22,23]. The bioavailability of GTPs could be substantially modified depending on the route of administration, or dosage form among other factors that should explain these differences [6].
High doses of (-) epigallocathechin-3-gallate trigger hepatotoxicity in mice [19]. In contrast, no subacute toxicity of green tea extract was seen in mice [18]. These discrepancies could also be due to the health condition of the animals.
Ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) are enzymes widespread throughout the plant kingdom and have been suggested to form part of the plant defense system against predators like insects [24], pathogen-like viruses [25], and fungi [26,27,28,29,30]. They display N-glycosidase activity on nucleic acids [31]. Interest in RIPs derives from their toxicity and from their possible use in anticancer immunotoxins and conjugates [30,32,33,34]. Some of these RIPs show lectin properties, being known as ribosome-inactivating lectins (RILs), such as nigrin b from elderberry bark [35] and ebulin f from dwarf elder fruits [36,37]. Both nigrin b and ebulin f display dose-dependent toxicities depending on the different administration way [35,37,38,39]. Both nigrin b and ebulin f administration promoted apoptosis of intestinal crypt cells in mice, as revealed by histological analysis [38,39,40]. This effect influences the uptake of nutrients like vitamin B6 [41]. There are several animal IBD models, and as well as cultured cell IBD assays, to perform preliminary biopharmaceutic experiments with new drugs or nutrients. The Sambucus RILs IBD model has been proposed as an interesting alternative to classical DNBS or DSS models, since Sambucus RILs derangement of the bowel mucosa is reversible [41,42].
Jimenez and coauthors demonstrated that the independent administration of high oral doses of Polyphenon 60 or high intraperitoneal doses of nigrin b to mice did not affect survival. Surprisingly, the coadministration of both substances resulted in the death of some animals with serious injury on small intestine and liver [43]. Whereas nigrin triggers specific intestinal derangement, ebulin affects not only the intestinal system, but also the lungs, kidneys, heart, and spleen [40]. The aim of the present research was to characterize the GTPs composition of several aqueous green tea extracts and to evaluate their potential healthy effect in the Sambucus ebulin IBD model.

2. Results

Analysis of the green tea extracts solutions proved that gallic acid reactivity corresponds to 3.1-times that of Polyphenon 60® (Figure 1).
Since Polyphenon 60® has a defined composition and as a previous step to the oral administration of the GTPs characterized green tea extracts, a standard solution of 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 were orally administered to Swiss mice with neither visible damage nor reduction of the body weight (Figure 2).
That concentration falls into the range of those used in human beings with alleged healthy results [44]. Intraperitoneal administration of 2.5 mg/kg ebulin f reduced by 20% the survival of mice 14 days after the experiment (Figure 2). The first death was registered at the fourth day and the last one at the tenth day. Unexpectedly, the combined administration to mice of both oral 30 mg/kg Pol60 and i.p. 2.5 mg/kg ebulin f notably increased toxicity of the ebulin f, resulting in a reduction of 70% of the mice survival, with the first death observed at the second day and the last one at the eleventh day (Figure 2).
Concerning to the body weight changes, ebulin f alone treatment promoted a 20% reduction in the body weight three days after its administration, then showed a further small reduction and later started to recover (Figure 3). One-way ANOVA showed significant differences from the Pol60 group at all sampling times. The animals treated with both ebulin f (i.p.) and Pol60 (p.o.) suffered the reduction of body weight, and also with a biphasic pattern. The first phase of the weight loss was not significantly different, with ebulin f reaching 20% (days 1–5). The second part was larger than the observed with ebulin f alone (days 6–14), reaching 40% (Figure 3).
Animals affected by the combined action of ebulin f and Pol60 were opened and examined. The abdominal cavities of control mice, ebulin f-treated mice, and Pol 60-treated mice euthanized at the 11th day after treatment are shown in Figure 4.
Only ebulin f-treated mice showed some alteration in the small intestine but showed a rather unaffected liver. Figure 5 shows the abdominal cavities of animals which died as a consequence of the different treatments. Ebulin-f-treated animals, which died at day five, showed an aspect very similar to those treated with ebulin f and Pol60, which died at day three (Figure 5). In this last case, the liver seems to be largely affected. The cavity of animals treated with ebulin f plus Pol60, which died at day eight, featured very dark areas in the internal organs, particularly the liver, intestines, and kidneys, presumably due to bleeding, and a weak consistency of tissues, which were difficult to remove or merely to displace in intact form. It was also characteristic of the effect the mucilage consistency and the general appearance of the organs.

3. Discussion

Numerous reports highlight the scientifically established benefits of green tea consumption [10,13,45]. However, several detrimental effects associated to the ingestion of large amounts of green tea or preparations of green tea highly enriched in polyphenols have been reported [19,20,46,47]. Of particular concern is the hepatotoxicity, presumably resulting from the ingestion of concentrated green tea extracts [19,48,49,50]. In experiments carried out with isolated mouse hepatocytes, it was found that high concentrations of EGCG promoted the production of reactive oxygen species and cytotoxicity [21]. Recent data indicate that intake of 1% GTPs diet aggravated colitis promoting colon carcinogenesis in mice treated with sodium dextran sulfate to induce colitis, while it decreased the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase in nontreated mice [51]. Furthermore, intake of high-dose GTPs induces nephrotoxicity in mice suffering sodium dextran sulfate-colitis by a mechanism which involves the downregulation of antioxidant enzymes and the expression of HSP70, HSP27, and HSP90 heat-shock proteins [22]. In this line of disruption of cellular mechanisms promoted by high-dose GTPs intake, it has been argued that the prooxidant activity of polyphenols could play a significant role in the destruction of transformed cells by the activation of apoptotic mechanisms leading to tumor reduction [11].
The i.p. administration of 5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f to mice leads to significant structural alterations consisting in atrophy of intestinal crypts, which is presented an apoptotic-like morphology and consequently leads to death of mice in 3-4 days [37,39]. In contrast, the intraperitoneal administration of 2.5 mg/kg doses to mice provoked lower mortality ([39], present results). However, as seen in Figure 2, with 2.5 mg/kg body weight dose, some lesions were produced, which had an important impact on the health of animals given orally 30 mg/kg GTPs. In fact, the derangement promoted by the combined treatment of ebulin f and Pol60 suggests a synergistic action that is more evident one week after the onset of treatment. That delayed toxicity would be the result of the combination of apoptotic actions of ebulin f preparing the target cells and GTP enhancing the apoptotic effects.
GTPs have been described also as potent prooxidant species both in vitro and in vivo [4]. They promote the formation of free radicals, which could trigger some of the apoptotic effects seen in the cancer chemoprevention [8,16,21,52,53]. The present findings support the emerging belief that consumption of large amounts of green tea polyphenols could promote some adverse effects [20]. On these grounds, we hypothesized that the proapoptotic actions of GTPs and ebulin f are synergistic, and this phenomenon is especially evident in mice bearing intestinal ebulin f-dependent injuries. Wang and coauthors recently demonstrated that high doses of EGCG suppressed antioxidant enzymes but activated the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) system [54]. A plausible explanation of this synergic effect may be that ebulin f could inhibit the synthesis of Nrf2-dependent cytoprotective enzymes, which could enhance the toxicity. Further research in the frame of quantification of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, heme oxygenase 1, or glutathione S-transferase is required to demonstrate this hypothesis.
From a healthcare point of view, that synergy could be very important, for instance, in patients suffering from intestinal derangement promoted by drug treatments. In that line, our results are in agreement with the results obtained with the combined treatment of green tea polyphenols and sulindac in azoxymethane-treated rats [12]. Research is being conducted to extend our results and to gain details on the molecular basis and its histological projection of the effects reported here.

4. Conclusions

The oral intake of a concentrated mixture of green tea polyphenols (Pol60) by mice potentiated the toxic effects promoted by the intraperitoneal administration of ebulin f. The delayed lethality promoted by the combined treatment raised the concern of the uncontrolled ingestion and abuse of these dietary supplement preparations. Our findings pose the question of the abuse of concentrated green tea extracts as a food antioxidant supplement, in particular, when therapeutic drugs that affect the gastrointestinal tract are used or toxic compounds are ingested.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Materials

Polyphenon 60 (Pol60) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Química SA (Tres Cantos, Spain). According to its technical product data sheet, Pol60 contains (-) epicatechin-3-gallate (21.0%), (-) epicatechin (7.3%), (-) epigallocatechin (7.9%), and (-) epigallo-catechin-3-gallate (29.2%), and was dissolved freshly in type I water obtained in a Milli-Q filtration system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and used immediately to avoid oxidation. Except water, all the other reagents and solvents used were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Química S.A. (Tres Cantos, Spain).

5.2. Isolation of Ebulin F

The toxin ebulin f present in fruits of dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L) was prepared as described elsewhere [36,39] with some modifications. Briefly, 200 g of green dwarf elder collected in the late spring were ground to obtain a finely cut material. That material was extracted overnight with 800 mL of 280-mM NaCl containing 5-mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) solution, strained through cheesecloth. The fluid was then centrifuged twice at 7500× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The clear supernatant was filtered through a two-layer of filter paper and chromatographed through acid-treated Sepharose 6B (AT-Sepharose 6B) to obtain D-galactose-binding proteins, which included SELfd and ebulin f. Both proteins were separated by Superdex 75 chromatography with 400-mM NaCl and 5-mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) buffer. Fractions containing SELfd (moving faster) and ebulin f were collected avoiding cross-contamination and concentrated with Amicon (Y10 membrane) to 2–2.5 mg/mL and stored as 0.1 aliquots at −20 °C. The purity of both proteins was checked by SDS-PAGE (Figure S1).

5.3. Green Tea Aqueous Extract Preparation

Tea extracts were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions of time and temperature (Table 1) by mixing 1 g of the corresponding green tea samples with 50 mL of water. Tea extracts were used immediately for the assays.

5.4. Subjects

A total number of 37 Swiss female mice were housed individually in plastic cages and fed ad libitum with the rat/mouse maintenance, 15-mm diet (Ssniff spezialialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), and with free access to water under a 12-h light-dark cycle. They were weighted daily and observed for any behavioral alteration and external signs of derangement. Handling of the animals followed the European Communities Council guidelines (2010/63/EU) and the Ethical Committee of the Animal Research and Welfare Service of the University of Valladolid (Approval Code: 607193, Date of approval: 13 November 2013).

5.5. Treatment

Four groups of animals were established. Group 1 (n = 16) was treated intraperitoneally with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f administered as solution in 0.1-M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, in a volume of 100 µL. Group 2 (n = 7) received one oral (p.o.) dose of Pol60 slowly as a water solution with a blunted end needle attached to a 1-mL syringe directly to the deepest part of the stomach, avoiding any resistance of the esophagus and the pass of the liquid to the lungs. Group 3 (n = 11) was administered with both treatments at the same day. Finally, Group 4 (n = 3) consisted of littermates which received no treatment to serve as controls. Both the food pellets and water were placed close to mice on the floor of the cage.

5.6. Phenolic Analysis

The Folin–Ciocalteu method is a simple, fast, and robust assay of performing total phenolics content and it is routinely practiced in laboratories testing food and plant extracts. However, the main drawback of that method is that reducing agents, such as ascorbic acid or certain amino acids, can interfere with the chromophore and thus overestimate the content of phenolic compounds [55]. It has been previously reported that galloyl groups from phenolic compounds can react with each Fe(III) ion to form a stable octahedral complex, allowing each phenolic compounds molecule to react with several Fe(III) centers to form a cross-linked film [56]. The coordination between Fe(III) and galloyl groups from phenolic compounds is pH-dependent, which can be attributed to transitions between mono-, bis-, and tris-complex states [57,58]. For that reason, an alternative analytical method for the rapid and inexpensive quantification of total phenolic substances with iron (III) chloride has been developed and validated according to the ICH recommendations, based on the following criteria: Linearity, precision, accuracy, selectivity, sensitivity, and robustness. Polyphenon 60® or gallic acid were used as standards (Figure S2 and Tables S1–S3).

5.7. Statistics

The analysis of data was conducted with SPSS software, version 25.0 (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL, USA). All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replicates unless otherwise stated. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant using the Student’s t-test between the two means for the unpaired data. Goodness of fitting was determined by the analysis of residuals and Durbin-Watson test, as well as Shapiro–Wilks and Akaike AIC stats. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey pairwise comparisons were used to test statistical differences in the comparative analysis of the green tea extracts solutions using gallic acid or Polyphenon 60®.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/12/9/542/s1, Figure S1: SDS-PAGE of SELfd 6 µg (line 2) and ebulin f 6 µg (line 3) purified from S. ebulus fruits, Figure S2: Correlation plot between gallic acid and Polyphenon 60®. Table S1: Linearity. Multiple regression results, Table S2: Main precision (repeatability and intermediate precision) and robustness results obtained at three different concentration levels: low, medium and high (L/M/H), Table S3: Statistical analysis and accuracy results

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.G., M.C.-D. and D.C.-D.; Formal analysis, T.G., M.C.-D. and D.C.-D.; Investigation, M.Á.R., M.G., P.J. and V.G.-R.; Methodology, D.C.-D.; Supervision, T.G.; Writing—original draft, M.Á.R. and M.G.; Writing—review & editing, M.C.-D. and D.C.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Junta de Castilla y León (GR106 and Consejería de Sanidad) and UVa-GIR.

Acknowledgments

We thank Philip Jaggs for revising the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DNBSdinitrobenzene sulfonic acid
DSSdextran sulfate sodium
RIPribosome-inactivating protein
IBDinflammatory bowel diseases
EGCGepigallocatechin gallate
GTPsgreen tea polyphenols
p.o.per os
i.p.intraperitoneal
Pol60Polyphenon 60
RILsribosome-inactivating lectins

References

  1. Cooper, R. Green tea and theanine: Health benefits. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hügel, H.M.; Jackson, N. Redox chemistry of green tea polyphenols: Therapeutic benefits in neurodegenerative diseases. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kanwar, J.; Taskeen, M.; Mohammad, I.; Huo, C.; Chan, T.H.; Dou, Q.P. Recent advances on tea polyphenols. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2012, 4, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, B.N.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. Green tea catechin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG): Mechanisms, perspectives and clinical applications. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1807–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Danesi, F.; Di Nunzio, M.; Boschetti, E.; Bordoni, A. Green tea extract selectively activates peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta in cultured cardiomyocytes. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 101, 1736–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yang, C.S.; Zhang, J. Studies on the Prevention of Cancer and Cardiometabolic Diseases by Tea: Issues on Mechanisms, Effective Doses, and Toxicities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5446–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, S.U.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Feng, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease via green tea polyphenols: Possible application and protective approaches. Inflammopharmacol 2018, 26, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carocho, M.; Ferreira, I.C. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shirakami, Y.; Shimizu, M.; Tsurumi, H.; Hara, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Moriwaki, H. EGCG and Polyphenon E attenuate inflammation-related mouse colon carcinogenesis induced by AOM plus DDS. Mol. Med. Rep. 2008, 1, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Erba, D.; Riso, P.; Bordoni, A.; Foti, P.; Biagi, P.L.; Testolin, G. Effectiveness of moderate green tea consumption on antioxidative status and plasma lipid profile in humans. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005, 16, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lambert, J.D.; Elias, R.J. The antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of green tea polyphenols: A role in cancer prevention. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 501, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ohishi, T.; Kishimoto, Y.; Miura, N.; Shiota, G.; Kohri, T.; Hara, Y.; Hasegawa, J.; Isemura, M. Synergistic effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate with sulindac against colon carcinogenesis of rats treated with azoxymethane. Cancer Lett. 2002, 177, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shimizu, M.; Adachi, S.; Masuda, M.; Kozawa, O.; Moriwaki, H. Cancer chemoprevention with green tea catechins by targeting receptor tyrosine kinases. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hengge, R. Targeting Bacterial Biofilms by the Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG. Molecules 2019, 24, 2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Toschi, T.G.; Bordoni, A.; Hrelia, S.; Bendini, A.; Lercker, G.; Biagi, P.L. The protective role of different green tea extracts after oxidative damage is related to their catechin composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3973–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Du, G.J.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, X.D.; Yu, C.; Calway, T.; Yuan, C.S.; Wang, C.Z. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the most effective cancer chemopreventive polyphenol in green tea. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1679–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, S.N.; Fu, J.; Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R.K. EGCG enhances the therapeutic potential of gemcitabine and CP690550 by inhibiting STAT3 signaling pathway in human pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hsu, Y.W.; Tsai, C.F.; Chen, W.K.; Huang, C.F.; Yen, C.C. A subacute toxicity evaluation of green tea (Camellia sinensis) extract in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2624–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lambert, J.D.; Kennett, M.J.; Sang, S.; Reuhl, K.R.; Ju, J.; Yang, C.S. Hepatotoxicity of high oral dose (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schönthal, A.H. Adverse effects of concentrated green tea extracts. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 874–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Galati, G.; Lin, A.; Sultan, A.M.; O’Brien, P.J. Cellular and in vivo hepatotoxicity caused by green tea phenolic acids and catechins. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Inoue, H.; Akiyama, S.; Maeda-Yamamoto, M.; Nesumi, A.; Tanaka, T.; Murakami, A. High-dose green tea polyphenols induce nephrotoxicity in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis mice by down-regulation of antioxidant enzymes and heat-shock protein expressions. Cell Stress Chaperon. 2011, 16, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Isbrucker, R.A.; Edwards, J.A.; Wolz, E.; Davidovich, A.; Bausch, J. Safety studies on epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) preparations. Part 2: Dermal, acute and short-term toxicity studies. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 636–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peumans, W.J.; Van Damme, E.J. Lectins as plant defense proteins. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Girbes, T.; de Torre, C.; Iglesias, R.; Ferreras, J.M.; Méndez, E. RIP for viruses. Nature 1996, 379, 777–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Girbés, T.; Ferreras, J.M.; Arias, F.J.; Stirpe, F. Description, distribution, activity and phylogenetic relationship of ribosome-inactivating proteins in plants, fungi and bacteria. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 461–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ng, T.B.; Wong, J.H.; Wang, H. Recent progress in research on ribosome inactivating proteins. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2010, 11, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puri, M.; Kaur, I.; Perugini, M.A.; Gupta, R.C. Ribosome-inactivating proteins: Current status and biomedical applications. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 13, 774–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stirpe, F. Ribosome-inactivating proteins. Toxicon 2004, 44, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stirpe, F. Ribosome-inactivating proteins: From toxins to useful proteins. Toxicon 2013, 67, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barbieri, L.; Ciani, M.; Girbés, T.; Liu, W.Y.; Van Damme, E.J.; Peumans, W.J.; Stirpe, F. Enzymatic activity of toxic and non-toxic type 2 ribosome-inactivating proteins. FEBS Lett. 2004, 563, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Govindan, S.V.; Goldenberg, D.M. Designing immunoconjugates for cancer therapy. Exp. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012, 12, 873–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Muñoz, R.; Arias, Y.; Ferreras, J.M.; Jiménez, P.; Langa, C.; Rojo, M.A.; Gayoso, M.J.; Córdoba-Díaz, D.; Bernabéu, C.; Girbés, T. In vitro and in vivo effects of an anti-mouse endoglin (CD105)-immunotoxin on the early stages of mouse B16MEL4A5 melanoma tumours. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2013, 62, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Muñoz, R.; Arias, Y.; Ferreras, J.M.; Rojo, M.A.; Gayoso, M.J.; Nocito, M.; Benitez, J.; Jiménez, P.; Bernabéu, C.; Girbés, T. Targeting a marker of the tumour neovasculature using a novel anti-human CD105-immunotoxin containing the non-toxic type 2 ribosome-inactivating protein nigrin b. Cancer Lett. 2007, 256, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ferreras, J.M.; Citores, L.; Iglesias, R.; Souza, A.M.; Jiménez, P.; Gayoso, M.; Girbés, T. Occurrence of the type two ribosome-inactivating protein nigrin b in elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) bark. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2798–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Citores, L.; de Benito, F.M.; Iglesias, R.; Ferreras, J.M.; Argüeso, P.; Jimenez, P.; Méndez, E.; Girbés, T. Presence of polymerized and free forms of the non-toxic type 2 ribosome-inactivating protein ebulin and a structurally related new homodimeric lectin in fruits of Sambucus ebulus L. Planta 1998, 204, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiménez, P.; Gayoso, M.J.; Tejero, J.; Cabrero, P.; Córdoba-Díaz, D.; Basterrechea, J.E.; Girbés, T. Toxicity in mice of lectin ebulin f present in dwarf elderberry (Sambucus ebulus L.). Toxicon 2013, 61, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gayoso, M.J.; Muñoz, R.; Arias, Y.; Villar, R.; Rojo, M.A.; Jiménez, P.; Ferreras, J.M.; Aranguez, I.; Girbés, T. Specific dose-dependent damage of Lieberkün crypts promoted by large doses of type 2 ribosome-inactivating protein nigrin b intravenous injection to mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 207, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jimenez, P.; Tejero, J.; Cabrero, P.; Cordoba-Diaz, D.; Girbes, T. Differential sensitivity of D-galactose-binding lectins from fruits of dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L.) to a simulated gastric fluid. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garrosa, M.; Jimenez, P.; Córdoba-Díaz, D.; García-Recio, V.; Gayoso, S.; Rojo, M.A.; Gayoso, M.J.; Girbés, T. In vivo toxicity of the ribosome-inactivating lectin ebulin f in elderly mice. Histol. Histopathol. 2018, 33, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiménez, P.; Cordoba-Diaz, D.; Cabrero, P.; Aracil, M.; Gayoso, M.J.; Garrosa, M.; Cordoba-Diaz, M.; Girbés, T. Plasma accumulations of vitamin B6 from an oral dose in a new reversible model for mouse gut injury and regeneration. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 4, 908–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lavín, L.; Garcia-Recio, V.; Jiménez, P.; Girbés, T.; Cordoba-Diaz, M.; Cordoba-Diaz, D. Pharmaceutical applications of lectins. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017, 42, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jimenez, P.; Cabrero, P.; Tejero, J.; Gayoso, M.J.; Garrosa, M.; Cordoba-Diaz, D.; Cordoba-Diaz, M.; Girbes, T. Concentrated Extract of Green Tea Polyphenols Enhances the Toxicity of the Elderberry Lectin Nigrin b to Mice. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 5, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chow, H.H.; Hakim, I.A.; Vining, D.R.; Crowell, J.A.; Ranger-Moore, J.; Chew, W.M.; Celaya, C.A.; Rodney, S.R.; Hara, Y.; Alberts, D.S. Effects of dosing condition on the oral bioavailability of green tea catechins after single-dose administration of Polyphenon 60 in healthy individuals. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 4627–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ui, A.; Kuriyama, S.; Kakizaki, M.; Sone, T.; Nakaya, N.; Ohmori-Matsuda, K.; Hozawa, A.; Nishino, Y.; Tsuji, I. Green tea consumption and the risk of liver cancer in Japan: The Ohsaki Cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2009, 20, 1939–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chan, P.C.; Ramot, Y.; Malarkey, D.E.; Blackshear, P.; Kissling, G.E.; Travlos, G.; Nyska, A. Fourteen-week toxicity study of green tea extract in rats and mice. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 38, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kapetanovic, I.M.; Crowell, J.A.; Krishnaraj, R.; Zakharov, A.; Lindeblad, M.; Lyubimov, A. Exposure and toxicity of green tea polyphenols in fasted and non-fasted dogs. Toxicology 2009, 260, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Javaid, A.; Bonkovsky, H.L. Hepatotoxicity due to extracts of Chinese green tea (Camellia sinensis): A growing concern. J. Hepatol. 2006, 45, 334–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jin, X.; Zheng, R.H.; Li, Y.M. Green tea consumption and liver disease: A systematic review. Liver Int. 2008, 28, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schmidt, M.; Schmitz, H.J.; Baumgart, A.; Guédon, D.; Netsch, M.I.; Kreuter, M.H.; Schmidlin, C.B.; Schrenk, D. Toxicity of green tea extracts and their constituents in rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, M.; Murakami, A.; Miyamoto, S.; Tanaka, T.; Ohigashi, H. The modifying effects of green tea polyphenols on acute colitis and inflammation-associated colon carcinogenesis in male ICR mice. Biofactors 2010, 36, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Forester, S.C.; Lambert, J.D. The role of antioxidant versus pro-oxidant effects of green tea polyphenols in cancer prevention. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kim, M.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, H.J.; Chung, J.H.; Leem, K.H.; Kim, H.K. Apoptotic effect of red wine polyphenols on human colon cancer SNU-C4 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Wan, X.; Yang, C.S.; Zhang, J. Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate triggered hepatotoxicity in mice: Responses of major antioxidant enzymes and the Nrf2 rescue pathway. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 283, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Berker, K.I.; Ozdemir Olgun, F.A.; Ozyurt, D.; Demirata, B.; Apak, R. Modified Folin-Ciocalteu antioxidant capacity assay for measuring lipophilic antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4783–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ejima, H.; Richardson, J.J.; Liang, K.; Best, J.P.; Van Koeverden, M.P.; Such, G.K.; Cui, J.; Caruso, F. One-Step assembly of coordination complexes for versatile film and particle engineering. Science 2013, 341, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Holten-Andersen, N.; Harrington, M.J.; Birkedal, H.; Lee, B.P.; Messersmith, P.B.; Lee, K.Y.C.; Waite, J.H. pH-induced metal-ligand cross-links inspired by mussel yield self-healing polymer networks with near-covalent elastic moduli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2651–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Xu, H.; Nishida, J.; Ma, W.; Wu, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Otsuka, H.; Takahara, A. Competition between oxidation and coordination in cross-linking of polystyrene copolymer containing catechol groups. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of the green tea extracts solutions using gallic acid and Polyphenon 60®. Results expressed as mg equivalent of standard per gram (wet weight) of plant material (WWPM). * One-way ANOVA significant differences (p < 0.001) F value ≥ 7.661.
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of the green tea extracts solutions using gallic acid and Polyphenon 60®. Results expressed as mg equivalent of standard per gram (wet weight) of plant material (WWPM). * One-way ANOVA significant differences (p < 0.001) F value ≥ 7.661.
Toxins 12 00542 g001
Figure 2. Survival evolution followed up to 14 days of mice treated with Pol60 and ebulin f. Female mice treated p.o. with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 (dashed line; n = 7), 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f (continuous line; n = 16) or both together (bold line; n = 11). * Tukey post-hoc significant difference from Pol60 group (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Survival evolution followed up to 14 days of mice treated with Pol60 and ebulin f. Female mice treated p.o. with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 (dashed line; n = 7), 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f (continuous line; n = 16) or both together (bold line; n = 11). * Tukey post-hoc significant difference from Pol60 group (p < 0.05).
Toxins 12 00542 g002
Figure 3. Body weight evolution followed up to 14 days of mice treated with Pol60 and ebulin f. Female mice were treated i.p. with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 (circles; n = 7), 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f (squares; n = 16) or both together (triangles; n = 11). * significant difference from Pol60 group. ** significant difference from ebulin f group (p < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparison by Tukey’s test).
Figure 3. Body weight evolution followed up to 14 days of mice treated with Pol60 and ebulin f. Female mice were treated i.p. with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 (circles; n = 7), 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f (squares; n = 16) or both together (triangles; n = 11). * significant difference from Pol60 group. ** significant difference from ebulin f group (p < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparison by Tukey’s test).
Toxins 12 00542 g003
Figure 4. Open abdominal cavities of representative mice 11 days after treatment. (A) Control animal; (B) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f; (C) Animal treated orally with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60.
Figure 4. Open abdominal cavities of representative mice 11 days after treatment. (A) Control animal; (B) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f; (C) Animal treated orally with 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60.
Toxins 12 00542 g004
Figure 5. Open abdominal cavities of representative dead mice. (A) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f, which died at the fifth day of the experiment; (B) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f and 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 orally, which died at the third day of the experiment; (C) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f and 30 mg/kg body weight of oral Pol60, which died at the eighth day of the experiment. All animal cavities were opened and photographed just after dead.
Figure 5. Open abdominal cavities of representative dead mice. (A) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f, which died at the fifth day of the experiment; (B) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f and 30 mg/kg body weight of Pol60 orally, which died at the third day of the experiment; (C) Animal treated i.p. with 2.5 mg/kg body weight of ebulin f and 30 mg/kg body weight of oral Pol60, which died at the eighth day of the experiment. All animal cavities were opened and photographed just after dead.
Toxins 12 00542 g005
Table 1. Extraction conditions proposed by the manufacturers for the assayed green teas.
Table 1. Extraction conditions proposed by the manufacturers for the assayed green teas.
TimeTea NameT (°C)t (min)
1Kukicha 3 years905
2Sencha902
3Kukicha905
4Hojicha 3 years1002
5Bancha803
6Bancha leaf803
7Matcha Second1000.5
8Gyokuro1002
9Matcha First1000.5
10Green Salvage903
11Special Gunpowder903
12Bi Luo Chung903
13Long Jing902
14Tai Ping Hou Kui881
15Chun Mee1002
16Jade Rings903
17Mo Li Feng Yan853
18Long Jing Dragon Well903
19Kukicha 3 years905

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rojo, M.Á.; Garrosa, M.; Jiménez, P.; Girbés, T.; Garcia-Recio, V.; Cordoba-Diaz, M.; Cordoba-Diaz, D. Unexpected Toxicity of Green Tea Polyphenols in Combination with the Sambucus RIL Ebulin. Toxins 2020, 12, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090542

AMA Style

Rojo MÁ, Garrosa M, Jiménez P, Girbés T, Garcia-Recio V, Cordoba-Diaz M, Cordoba-Diaz D. Unexpected Toxicity of Green Tea Polyphenols in Combination with the Sambucus RIL Ebulin. Toxins. 2020; 12(9):542. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rojo, M. Ángeles, Manuel Garrosa, Pilar Jiménez, Tomás Girbés, Verónica Garcia-Recio, Manuel Cordoba-Diaz, and Damián Cordoba-Diaz. 2020. "Unexpected Toxicity of Green Tea Polyphenols in Combination with the Sambucus RIL Ebulin" Toxins 12, no. 9: 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12090542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop