Next Article in Journal
Degradation and Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 by Tea-Derived Aspergillus niger RAF106
Next Article in Special Issue
N58A Exerts Analgesic Effect on Trigeminal Neuralgia by Regulating the MAPK Pathway and Tetrodotoxin-Resistant Sodium Channel
Previous Article in Journal
The Failures of Ethnobotany and Phytomedicine in Delivering Novel Treatments for Snakebite Envenomation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/toxins12120775
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Involvement of Central Noradrenergic Pathway in the Analgesic Effect of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats

by
Daxian Li
1,
Geehoon Chung
2 and
Sun Kwang Kim
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Science in Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
2
Department of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
3
Department of East-West Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(12), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120775
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 4 December 2020 / Published: 6 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Venom and Pain)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vincristine is a vinca alkaloid anti-mitotic drug with a broad spectrum of effects on solid and hematologic cancers. The major dose-limiting factor of this anti-cancer regimen is painful peripheral neuropathy. However, no gold-standard analgesic option has been used clinically. In this study, we investigated the effects and mechanism of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) to alleviate peripheral neuropathic pain induced by repeated intraperitoneal infusions of vincristine (1 mg/kg/day, days 1–5 and 8–12) in rats. Subcutaneous injection with bee venom (BV, 1.0 mg/kg) at the ST36 acupoint ameliorated cold and mechanical hypersensitivity (i.e., aberrant withdrawal responses in acetone drop and von Frey hair tests, respectively). In vivo extracellular recording demonstrated that BVA inhibited cutaneous cold (acetone) and mechanical (brush, press, and pinch) stimuli-elicited abnormal hyperexcitation of the spinal wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in vincristine-treated rats. In addition, the microinjection of lidocaine into the ipsilateral locus coeruleus or the antagonism of the spinal α2-adrenergic receptors clearly reversed the effects of BVA on cold and mechanical hypersensitivity, indicating a vital role of the descending noradrenergic modulation in analgesia. These findings suggest that BVA could be a potential therapeutic option for vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Keywords:
chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; vincristine; bee venom acupuncture; spinal wide dynamic range neuron; locus coeruleus; adrenergic receptor
Key Contribution: BVA at the ST36 acupoint alleviates vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy via recruiting the descending noradrenergic pathway from the LC.

1. Introduction

Vincristine, a derivative of Madagascar Catharanthus roseus (a species of flowering plant in the Apocynaceae family), is a core antineoplastic agent used to control the proliferation of lymphomas, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and sarcomas [1]. Nonetheless, several articles have described vincristine-induced paresthesias, ongoing or evoked painful abnormalities (i.e., allodynia and hyperalgesia) in the extremities [2,3,4], which cause serious concern as an increasing number of patients received this life-saving regimen. In clinical settings, most cancer survivors experience progressive chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in the early stages of therapy or even years after the end of vincristine therapy [5]. Once this dose-limiting complication develops, there is a high likelihood of dose reduction or the termination of anti-cancer therapy [6]. Unfortunately, no gold-standard curative or prophylactic pharmaceutical strategy is currently available.
In conventional medicine, natural compounds isolated from animals and plants represent a rich source of analgesics [7]. Among these, bee venom (BV), a venomous mixture secreted from Apis mellifera, has been commonly used for pain relief, mostly by injecting it into acupuncture points (i.e., apipuncture) [8,9]. As several components of BV (e.g., peptide 401 and histamine) have allergic properties, such therapy could need allergy tests prior to the clinical applications [9,10]. On the other hand, articles have reported that BV suppresses allergic reactions by modulation of regulatory T cells [11]. To date, the detailed analgesic features of acupuncture with purified BV or its main bioactive substances (e.g., melittin and bvPLA2) have been gradually studied in clinical diseases, such as osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal pain, and neuropathic pain [7,8,12]. Our earlier publications have reported that BV acupuncture (BVA) or administration of BV sub-components at ST36 (Zusanli) acupoint provided broad analgesia in oxaliplatin- or paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain models, by selectively activating the spinal adrenergic receptors [13,14,15]. The descending noradrenergic system, which mainly originates in the locus coeruleus (LC, or A6), is the principal origin of endogenous pain modulation [16,17]. However, the effectiveness of BVA therapy and its noradrenergic mechanism (at the LC or spinal level) in the management of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy remains elusive.
Here, we first elucidated whether acupoint treatments with BV and its bioactive constituents (melittin or bvPLA2) could alleviate vincristine-induced behavioral hypersensitivity in rats. Second, using in vivo extracellular recording, we sought to explore the suppressive properties of BVA on the hyperexcitation of spinal wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in rats with neuropathy. Finally, with the silencing of LC or blockade of the spinal adrenergic receptors, we investigated the specific recruitment of noradrenergic inhibitory control in BVA-induced analgesia.

2. Results

2.1. Cold and Mechanical Hypersensitivity Following Vincristine Administrations in Rats

Ten intraperitoneal infusions of vincristine (0.1 mg/kg/day, i.p.; days 1–5 and days 8–12) induced cold and mechanical hypersensitivity in rats during 31 days of experiments. No difference between groups was observed in the baseline values, regardless of the sub-modality of assays (cold or mechanical stimulation). The licking and shaking frequency of the hind paw in response to topical acetone application (10 μL) increased in the vincristine-treated group compared to the control group (p < 0.01, day 13; p < 0.001, days 16 to 25, Figure 1A). We interpreted these aberrant symptoms as cold allodynia. For the von Frey hair (VFH) assay, mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia (determined using 4 g and 15 g filament, respectively) were persistently observed from days 16 to 31 (allodynia, p < 0.01, days 16, 19, and 28; p < 0.001, days 22, 25, and 31, Figure 1B) or days 13 to 31 (hyperalgesia, p < 0.05, day 28; p < 0.01, days 25 and 31; p < 0.001, days 13 to 22, Figure 1C) after the first injection, respectively. Thus, the following evaluations were conducted during days 16 to 25, when all three types of hypersensitivity were significant. In addition, the rats subjected to vincristine administrations displayed a significantly lower increment of weight compared to the controls (p < 0.001, days 7 to 22; p < 0.01, days 25 to 31, Figure 1D).

2.2. Comparison of Alleviative Effects of BVA, BvPLA2, and Melittin on Vincristine-Induced Behavioral Hypersensitivity

To compare the suppressive effects of several BV maneuvers, 48 rats with cold and mechanical allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia were arbitrarily allocated into four groups: BV (1 mg/kg), melittin (0.5 mg/kg), bvPLA2 (0.12 mg/kg), or saline (control) was subcutaneously administrated at the ST36 acupoint. Behavioral tests were performed from the ipsilateral hind paw before acupoint injection and re-examined at 30, 60, and 120 min after application. Among these, BVA markedly attenuated the deterioration of symptoms on the acetone test, which lasted up to 60 min (p < 0.05, 30 min, and p < 0.01, 60 min, Figure 2A). In the VFH assay, the aberrant response of withdrawals to 4 g and 15 g filaments was significantly decreased after BVA, lasting for 60 min (allodynia, p < 0.01, 30 min and p < 0.05, 60 min; hyperalgesia, p < 0.001, 30 min and p < 0.01, 60 min, Figure 2B,C). Melittin treatment mitigated mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, as shown by obvious decrements in withdrawal responses in both the VFH assays (allodynia, p < 0.01, 30 min and p < 0.05, 60 and 120 min; hyperalgesia, p < 0.001, 30 min), while the behavioral change in the acetone drop test was not significant. Independent of the form of the tests, the effect of bvPLA2 was insignificant at any time point (p > 0.05). Based on these findings, using in vivo electrophysiological and neuropharmacological techniques, we further elucidated the analgesic mechanism of BVA, which was efficacious for both cold and mechanical complications.

2.3. Vincristine Augmented Cold and Mechanical Sensory Responses of Spinal WDR Neuron in Rats

Having established different forms of behavioral hypersensitivity (Figure 1A–C), we explored the responses of spinal WDR neurons to cutaneous cold and mechanical stimuli using an in vivo extracellular recording approach (see Methods for details). Stimulus-evoked signals from 12 rats with pain behaviors, and eight control rats were analyzed (Figure 3E). In the neuropathy group, the discharge rate induced by acetone drop was significantly higher than that in the control rats (14.69 ± 1.91 vs. 5.35 ± 1.23 spikes/s, p < 0.001, Figure 3A). Likewise, mechanical dynamic brush, press, or pinch-evoked firing events in rats with neuropathy were markedly higher than in the controls. (brush, 18.20 ± 1.22 vs. 11.12 ± 1.62 spikes/s, p < 0.01; press, 38.33 ± 2.48 vs. 15.28 ± 1.80 spikes/s, p < 0.001; pinch, 37.69 ± 2.38 vs. 20.58 ± 2.95 spikes/s, p < 0.001, Figure 3B–D). These increments of stimulus-evoked activity of WDR neurons were correlated with the estimated behavioral results (Figure 1A–C), indicating the existence of CIPN generated by vincristine.

2.4. BVA Ameliorated Hyperexcitation of Spinal WDR Neuron Following Vincristine Administrations

To evaluate whether BVA could inhibit neuronal hyperexcitation after vincristine infusions, in vivo extracellular recordings of spinal WDR neurons were made from rats accompanied by behavioral hypersensitivity. Once a single-unit activity was detected, ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli (cold: acetone; mechanical: brush, press, and pinch, Figure 4A–E) were applied before and at 30-min intervals for 1 h after BVA (1.0 mg/kg, ST36) or SAL treatment. Compared to the evoked single-unit activity recorded before BVA treatment, and independently of the type of stimuli, apparent decrements of the evoked firing rate were shown at 30 and 60 min after BVA (Figure 4A–D). Conversely, the neuronal responses were insignificantly changed in SAL-treated rats (p > 0.05). In accordance with the behavioral results mentioned above (Figure 2), our in vivo recording data demonstrated that 1.0 mg/kg of BVA at the ST36 acupoint exerted adequate analgesic effects on peripheral neuropathy elicited by vincristine.

2.5. Antagonism of Spinal α-Adrenergic Receptor Abolished BVA-Induced Analgesia

To clarify the alleviative effects of BVA under the specific pharmacological blockade of spinal α-adrenergic receptors (AR), the animals received the α1-AR antagonist prazosin (30 μg), the α2-AR antagonist idazoxan (50 μg), or an appropriate vehicle intrathecally 20 min before BVA application. We measured the level of neuropathy twice, just before the intrathecal (i.t.) administration and 30 min after BVA. Results revealed that pre-administration with idazoxan, not prazosin or vehicles (20% DMSO or PBS), abolished BVA-induced analgesia (Figure 5A–C). Overall, the spinal α2-AR, but not the α1-AR subtype mechanism, provided a vital contribution to the analgesic actions of BVA on cold and mechanical hypersensitivity induced by vincristine.

2.6. Local Blockade of the LC Reversed BVA-Induced Analgesia

To further investigate the potential participation of LC noradrenergic nuclei in the alleviative actions of BVA, local anesthesia in the LC was performed. The LC ipsilateral to the BVA injection and the behavioral test was targeted (see Methods for details). Silencing the LC region by microinjecting with lidocaine (0.5 μL, 2%) did not change the levels of cold and mechanical sensitivity in rats with neuropathy (p > 0.05, Figure 6A–C). In a subsequent trial, the animals received BVA treatment immediately after LC microinjection. Any aberrant symptoms were attenuated by BVA in the group that received a pre-microinjection with saline into the LC (SAL + BVA group; p < 0.01, p < 0.001, Figure 6D-F). In contrast, the ameliorative effects of BVA were completely abolished by prior microinjection with lidocaine into the LC region (LIDO + BVA group; p > 0.05, Figure 6D,F). Behavioral tests were performed 30 min after the BVA application, and only the results from the trials in which the microinjection was correctly into the LC area were analyzed (Figure 6G). Taken together, these results indicate the critical involvement of LC noradrenergic neurons in the suppressive actions of BVA on vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy.

3. Discussion

In oncological care, the anti-cancer regimen of vincristine often results in the development of CIPN, which seriously impairs the prognosis of a survivor, who is already suffering huge stress with the existence of malignancy [6]. Fundamental painkillers (e.g., NSAIDs and opioids) have limited effectiveness on this intractable neurotoxic complication, making it more challenging to the patient [5]. As such, a novel therapeutic maneuver with reliable effects for CIPN is urgently required. Recently, our team reported that BVA, as one of the traditional mainstay methods for pain relief in East Asia, exerted remarkable effects in rodent models of peripheral neuropathy caused by taxanes or platinum-based anti-tumor substances [13,14,15,18]. Besides, the location specificity (acupoint vs. non-acupoint) of BV-induced analgesia has been determined in CIPN models [15]. In the current article, we demonstrate for the first time the ameliorative effect and mechanism of this pharmacopuncture therapy in vincristine-induced neuropathic signs in rats.
Once-daily injection with vincristine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) for two 5-day cycles elicited noticeable cold and mechanical hypersensitivity in hind paws (Figure 1), which was consistent with other studies [19,20,21]. Major biological elements from BV have been shown to be efficacious for different painful deficits [7,13,14,15,22,23,24]. Among the constituents, melittin (peptides) and bvPLA2 (enzymes) are the main bioactive ingredients of BV, representing 50% and 12% in dry weight, respectively [13,25]. We compared the effect of stimulating the ST36 acupoint with melittin, bvPLA2, or BV. The ST36 is located below the knee joint [26], and moxibustion, laser, or electrical stimulation applied to this acupoint could relieve numerous symptoms of pain [27,28,29]. We first confirmed that 1.0 mg/kg BVA was efficacious for all sub-types of hypersensitivity (Figure 2). However, 0.12 mg/kg of bvPLA2 was unable to eliminate cold and mechanical abnormalities, and 0.5 mg/kg of melittin only alleviated two kinds of mechanical disturbance. For this reason, BVA treatment was chosen as a method of intervention in subsequent electrophysiological and neuropharmacological assays.
In electrophysiological analyses, we focused on the cutaneous stimulation-evoked responsiveness of WDR neurons distributed in the spinal dorsal horn, as a convergence of inputs from the somatic source could be widely relayed to those multi-receptive projection neurons [30,31,32]. Our investigation is the first to describe the alteration of peripheral cold stimuli-generated discharges arising in WDR neurons after vincristine treatments. We observed that both innocuous stimuli (acetone cooling and mechanical brush) and more noxious mechanical stimuli (press and pinch) elicited a more massive neuronal discharge under conditions of neuropathy (Figure 3). Furthermore, similar to the results of behavioral analyses (Figure 2), 1.0 mg/kg of BVA considerably protected rats from the neuronal hyperexcitation induced by vincristine (Figure 4). Growing evidence implies that the enhanced firing events of WDR neurons represent a state of pain [21,33,34], and therapy-induced decrement of these discharge rates means analgesia [35,36,37,38], indicating that our results could be promising therapeutic options for the clinical management of CIPN.
Our next objective was to explore the functional role of the descending noradrenergic circuitry in BVA-induced analgesia. Peripheral mechanical or thermal stimulations could broadly activate the nuclei of the ipsilateral LC [39,40,41] and descending axons from the LC release noradrenaline, mostly in the ipsilateral spinal area [42,43]. By intrathecally administering α-AR antagonists or directly exposing the ipsilateral LC to lidocaine (Figure 5 and Figure 6), we determined that the BVA alleviated vincristine-induced neuropathy via activation of the spinal α2-AR, and the noradrenergic nuclei of the LC were involved in this analgesia. Similarly, applying acupuncture at the ipsilateral ST38 (Tiaokou) acupoint has been shown to relieve chronic shoulder pain by regulating activities of the brainstem and thalamus area [44]. α2-ARs are expressed in dorsal horn neurons and central terminals of the primary afferent fibers, and the activation of these receptors could attenuate the release of neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate, substance P), thereby reducing pain transmission, and leading to considerable analgesia [16,45]. Indeed, our earlier practice has proved that oxaliplatin-induced hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons was suppressed by the spinal administration of adrenergic agonists [46]. Microinjections of lidocaine into the LC often induced negligible changes in pain levels [47,48,49], which was in agreement with our results (Figure 6A–C), while a recent article has revealed somewhat contrary outcomes [50]. We speculated that differences in paradigms of behavioral tests and models of pain could partially explain this discrepancy (values of overall percentage vs. up-down method in VFH tests and rodent models of CIPN vs. sural nerve injury).
A few pre-clinical investigations have suggested that the biological components of BV effectively inhibit metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma and proliferation of leukemic, gastrointestinal cancer, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells [51,52,53,54]. Although often unconsidered, these may be of very significance, as ideal analgesia should be appropriately efficacious against unwanted CIPN without affecting the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapy [5]. In this context, further practice is required to decipher whether antineoplastics combined with BVA could achieve better life-prolonging outcomes in the clinic.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we found that 1.0 mg/kg of BVA at ST36 could alleviate cold and mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of vincristine-induced neuropathy. This acupuncture maneuver also attenuated the hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons in rats with neuropathy. Moreover, BVA-induced analgesia was mediated, at least in part, by the descending noradrenergic pathway, which mainly originates from the LC. These findings suggest that BVA could be a novel analgesic candidate for vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Animal

Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (7 weeks old, 190–210 g) were purchased (Daehan Biolink, Chungbuk, Korea) and housed three per cage on sawdust bedding with unrestricted access to water and chow at controlled room temperature (23 ± 2 °C). Artificial lighting was regulated on a conventional 12-h light-dark cycle (dark cycle: 7 PM to 7 AM). All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Kyung Hee University Animal Care and Use Committee (KHUASP (SE) 19-011; approved January 2019 and KHUASP (SE) 20–147; approved April 2020) and performed according to the ethical guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain [55].

5.2. Behavioral Evaluation

The animals were accustomed to the testing circumstances and familiarized with the same experimenter one week before the test. On each testing day, the rats were enclosed beneath an inverted, transparent plastic box (20 × 20 × 14 cm) atop a steel mesh floor and allowed to acclimate for 30 min before the assay [15,56].
To measure cold allodynia, brisk reactions of the hind paw caused by acetone stimuli were monitored [57]. Using a pipette with a length of polyethylene tubing [46], 10 μL of acetone (Reagents Chemical Ltd., Kyeonggi-Do, Korea) was applied to the plantar surface of the right hind paw three times once every 10 min. The brisk shaking and licking frequency of the hind paws were quantified for 30 s [15,56].
To examine mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, rapid withdrawals of the hind paw elicited by von Frey filament applications with a bending force of 4 g (a usually innocuous stimulus) or 15 g (a usually noxious stimulus) were assessed as described in detail elsewhere [20,58]. The von Frey hair stimulus (Linton Instrumentation, Norfolk, UK) was applied vertically to the mid-plantar surface of the right hind paw ten times at 10 s intervals. The sharp withdrawal numbers were monitored and calculated as the total percentage response [13].

5.3. Vincristine Administration

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) was established using daily vincristine infusions (0.1 mg/kg, 0.1 mg/mL, i.p.; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) on two 5-day cycles with a 2-day-off schedule (days 1–5 and days 8–12) [20,21]. The vincristine group received a total of 1.0 mg/kg anti-cancer drug, and an equivalent volume of normal saline was injected into the controls.

5.4. BV, BvPLA2, or Melittin Acupuncture Treatment

Bee venom (BV, 1.0 mg/kg; Jayeonsaeng TJ, Kyeonggi-Do, Korea), bvPLA2 (0.12 mg/kg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or melittin (0.5 mg/kg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in SAL (50 μL) and injected subcutaneously at the right hind limb ST36 (Zusanli) acupoint of animals with neuropathic signs, respectively [13]. All selected doses were guided by various publications showing analgesic effects [13,14,15,18]. ST36 is located on the tibialis anterior muscle, 5 mm lateral, and distal to the anterior tibial tubercle [14,26].

5.5. In Vivo Extracellular Single-Unit Recording

Extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from the spinal dorsal horn wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons [14,46]. In brief, thoracolumbar vertebral laminectomy (T13-L2) was performed under urethane anesthesia (1.5 g/kg, i.p.; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to expose the L3-L5 region of the spinal cord. To secure in a stereotaxic frame, two spinal clamps were applied to stabilize the spinal column. The exposed spinal cord was superfused with Krebs solution containing the following (in mM): 11 glucose, 25 NaHCO3, 117 NaCl, 3.6 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, and 1.2 NaH2PO4 saturated with O2/CO2 gas (19:1 v/v), 38 ± 1 °C at a rate of 15 mL/min [40,46]. After the removal of the dura mater, a 10-MΩ tungsten electrode (FHC, Bowdoin, USA) was smoothly inserted into the dorsal horn and manually descended using a microdrive (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). The receptive field of the isolated WDR neuron was identified by stimulating the surface of the right hind paw in the following order: brush, press, pinch, and acetone drop [14]. Among these, a brush stimulus was given by stroking the receptive field with a camel brush five times for 4 s. Press stimulus was performed by pressing the center of the receptive field for 4 s using the blunt tip of the camel brush with a diameter of 0.5 cm and a magnitude of approximately 20 g. Each 3-s pinch stimulus was applied to the skin with toothed forceps (11022-14, Fine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany) [14]. For cold stimulation, 10 μL of acetone was applied to the receptive field [46]. Stimulus-evoked signals were amplified (DAM80, WPI, Sarasota, USA) and digitized (Digidata 1440A, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA), followed by offline data analysis with Spike 2 v6.0 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) [46].

5.6. Cannula Implantation and Drug Microinjection into the LC

Rats with cold and mechanical hypersensitivity were stabilized in a stereotaxic frame under isoflurane anesthesia (2.5–3.0%; Hana Pharm. Co., Kyeonggi-Do, Korea) delivered with O2/NO gas (1:1 v/v) [59]. A hole was drilled in the skull, and a stainless-steel guide cannula (26 GA, C315G; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) was lowered to 1.0 mm above the right side LC with the following coordinates: AP, -9.8 mm from the bregma; ML, 1.3 mm from the midline; DV, 6.5 mm below the skull [60]. Each cannula was placed in the skull with two screws using dental cement and plugged with a dummy cannula (C315DC/1; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) [47,59]. Following surgery, the animals underwent a 6-day period of recovery [61].
A microinjection was performed under isoflurane-induced (1–1.5%) light sedation [61]. The dummy was replaced with an injection cannula (33 G, C315I; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) protruding 1.0 mm beyond the end of the guide cannula (i.e., DV, 7.5 mm below the skull). 0.5 μL of SAL or 2% lidocaine was infused over 30 s via a Hamilton syringe (10 μL; Hamilton Co., Reno, NV, USA) attached to a polyethylene (PE-10) tubing to the injection cannula [47,49,61]. To minimize backflow, the injection cannula remained in place for an extra 5 min. After receiving urethane anesthesia (2.0 g/kg, i.p.), animals were microinjected with trypan blue (0.5 μL; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to mark the position. Each pons was removed, sliced into coronal sections (20 μm) [61]. We only analyzed data from the tests in which the microinjection was correctly placed into the LC region (n = 38 total rats, and n = 28 rats with correct implantation).

5.7. Spinal Antagonist Treatment

To clarify which spinal α-AR subtype mediates the analgesic actions of BVA in vincristine-administered rats, specific α-AR antagonists were administered intrathecally (i.t.) 20 min before BVA treatment [13,14]. The α1-AR antagonist prazosin (30 μg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and α2-AR antagonist idazoxan (50 μg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in 20% DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) or PBS (10 μL), respectively [13,14]. In a prone position under isoflurane anesthesia (2.0–2.5%), each animal was subjected to an i.t. administration of antagonist or vehicle via a direct lumbar puncture at the L5-L6 intervertebral level [14,62].

5.8. Experimental Schedule and Schematics of the Putative Central Mechanism of BVA-Induced Analgesia

Repeated i.p. infusions of vincristine (days 1–5 and days 8–12) elicited all three types of hypersensitivity at days 16 to 25. As a result, in vivo electrophysiological and neuropharmacological assays were performed in this period (Figure 7A). We speculated that BVA at the ST36 acupoint could alleviate vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy through the specific recruitment of the central noradrenergic pathway, which mainly originates in the LC (Figure 7B).

5.9. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism v7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). Statistical testing was performed with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, unpaired t-test, or paired t-test as appropriate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and S.K.K.; methodology, D.L., G.C., and S.K.K.; performing experiments, D.L.; formal analysis, D.L. and G.C.; investigation, D.L. and G.C.; resources, S.K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.; writing—review and editing, G.C. and S.K.K.; visualization, D.L.; supervision, S.K.K.; project administration, S.K.K.; funding acquisition, S.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2017M3A9E4057926).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mora, E.; Smith, E.M.L.; Donohoe, C.; Hertz, D.L. Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 2416. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dougherty, P.M.; Cata, J.P.; Burton, A.W.; Vu, K.; Weng, H.-R. Dysfunction in multiple primary afferent fiber subtypes revealed by quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic vincristine-induced pain. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2007, 33, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Starobova, H.; Vetter, I. Pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kerckhove, N.; Collin, A.; Condé, S.; Chaleteix, C.; Pezet, D.; Balayssac, D. Long-term effects, pathophysiological mechanisms, and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies: A comprehensive literature review. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zajączkowska, R.; Kocot-Kępska, M.; Leppert, W.; Wrzosek, A.; Mika, J.; Wordliczek, J. Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boyette-Davis, J.A.; Hou, S.; Abdi, S.; Dougherty, P.M. An updated understanding of the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Pain Manag. 2018, 8, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lin, T.-Y.; Hsieh, C.-L. Clinical Applications of Bee Venom Acupoint Injection. Toxins 2020, 12, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Seo, B.-K.; Han, K.; Kwon, O.; Jo, D.-J.; Lee, J.-H. Efficacy of bee venom acupuncture for chronic low back pain: A randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial. Toxins 2017, 9, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Wang, X.-R.; Lin, L.-T.; Xiao, L.-Y.; Zhou, P.; Shi, G.-X.; Liu, C.-Z. Bee venom therapy: Potential mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Toxicon 2018, 148, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cherniack, E.P.; Govorushko, S. To bee or not to bee: The potential efficacy and safety of bee venom acupuncture in humans. Toxicon 2018, 154, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chung, E.S.; Lee, G.; Lee, C.; Ye, M.; Chung, H.-S.; Kim, H.; Sung-joo, S.B.; Hwang, D.-S.; Bae, H. Bee venom phospholipase A2, a novel Foxp3+ regulatory T cell inducer, protects dopaminergic neurons by modulating neuroinflammatory responses in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 4853–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Aufschnaiter, A.; Kohler, V.; Khalifa, S.; El-Wahed, A.; Du, M.; El-Seedi, H.; Büttner, S. Apitoxin and its components against cancer, neurodegeneration and rheumatoid arthritis: Limitations and possibilities. Toxins 2020, 12, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Choi, J.; Jeon, C.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, J.U.; Quan, F.S.; Lee, K.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.K. Suppressive Effects of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Rats: Mediation by Spinal α2-Adrenergic Receptor. Toxins 2017, 9, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Choi, S.; Chae, H.K.; Heo, H.; Hahm, D.-H.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.K. Analgesic Effect of Melittin on Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats. Toxins 2019, 11, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Li, D.; Yoo, J.H.; Kim, S.K. Long-Lasting and Additive Analgesic Effects of Combined Treatment of Bee Venom Acupuncture and Venlafaxine on Paclitaxel-Induced Allodynia in Mice. Toxins 2020, 12, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Millan, M.J. Descending control of pain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2002, 66, 355–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pertovaara, A.; Almeida, A. Descending inhibitory systems. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 81, pp. 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, W.; Kim, M.J.; Go, D.; Min, B.-I.; Na, H.S.; Kim, S.K. Combined effects of bee venom acupuncture and morphine on oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain in mice. Toxins 2016, 8, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jaggi, A.S.; Kaur, G.; Bali, A.; Singh, N. Pharmacological investigations on mast cell stabilizer and histamine receptor antagonists in vincristine-induced neuropathic pain. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2017, 390, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Flatters, S.J.; Bennett, G.J. Ethosuximide reverses paclitaxel-and vincristine-induced painful peripheral neuropathy. Pain 2004, 109, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weng, H.-R.; Cordella, J.; Dougherty, P.M. Changes in sensory processing in the spinal dorsal horn accompany vincristine-induced hyperalgesia and allodynia. PAIN® 2003, 103, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roh, D.-H.; Kwon, Y.-B.; Kim, H.-W.; Ham, T.-W.; Yoon, S.-Y.; Kang, S.-Y.; Han, H.-J.; Lee, H.-J.; Beitz, A.J.; Lee, J.-H. Acupoint stimulation with diluted bee venom (apipuncture) alleviates thermal hyperalgesia in a rodent neuropathic pain model: Involvement of spinal alpha2-adrenoceptors. J. Pain 2004, 5, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, D.; Lee, Y.; Kim, W.; Lee, K.; Bae, H.; Kim, S.K. Analgesic effects of bee venom derived phospholipase A2 in a mouse model of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain. Toxins 2015, 7, 2422–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Baek, Y.H.; Huh, J.E.; Lee, J.D.; Park, D.S. Antinociceptive effect and the mechanism of bee venom acupuncture (Apipuncture) on inflammatory pain in the rat model of collagen-induced arthritis: Mediation by α2-Adrenoceptors. Brain Res. 2006, 1073, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eze, O.; Nwodo, O.; Ogugua, V.N. Therapeutic effect of honey bee venom. Proteins (enzymes) 2016, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yin, C.S.; Jeong, H.-S.; Park, H.-J.; Baik, Y.; Yoon, M.-H.; Choi, C.-B.; Koh, H.G. A proposed transpositional acupoint system in a mouse and rat model. Res. Vet. Sci. 2008, 84, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeng, Y.-J.; Lin, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chang, J.-H.; Wu, J.-H.; Hsu, S.-F.; Tsai, S.-Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Wen, Y.-R. Laser acupuncture-induced analgesic effect and molecular alterations in an incision pain model: A comparison with electroacupuncture-induced effects. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018, 33, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lu, K.-W.; Hsu, C.-K.; Hsieh, C.-L.; Yang, J.; Lin, Y.-W. Probing the effects and mechanisms of electroacupuncture at ipsilateral or contralateral ST36–ST37 acupoints on CFA-induced inflammatory pain. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zuo, C.-Y.; Lv, P.; Zhang, C.-S.; Lei, R.-X.; Zhou, W.; Wu, Q.-F.; Luo, L.; Tang, Y.; Yin, H.-Y.; Yu, S.-G. Ipsi-and contralateral moxibustion generate similar analgesic effect on inflammatory pain. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Le Bars, D.; Cadden, S. What is a wide-dynamic-range cell? In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 331–338. [Google Scholar]
  31. Baron, R.; Binder, A.; Wasner, G. Neuropathic pain: Diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baron, R. Mechanisms of disease: Neuropathic pain—A clinical perspective. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2006, 2, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Renn, C.L.; Carozzi, V.A.; Rhee, P.; Gallop, D.; Dorsey, S.G.; Cavaletti, G. Multimodal assessment of painful peripheral neuropathy induced by chronic oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in mice. Mol. Pain 2011, 7, 1744–8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Nazemi, S.; Manaheji, H.; Noorbakhsh, S.M.; Zaringhalam, J.; Sadeghi, M.; Mohammad-Zadeh, M.; Haghparast, A. Inhibition of microglial activity alters spinal wide dynamic range neuron discharge and reduces microglial Toll-like receptor 4 expression in neuropathic rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2015, 42, 772–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gwak, Y.S.; Tan, H.Y.; Nam, T.S.; Paik, K.S.; Hulsebosch, C.E.; Leem, J.W. Activation of spinal GABA receptors attenuates chronic central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 2006, 23, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Patel, R.; Kucharczyk, M.; Montagut-Bordas, C.; Lockwood, S.; Dickenson, A.H. Neuropathy following spinal nerve injury shares features with the irritable nociceptor phenotype: A back-translational study of oxcarbazepine. Eur. J. Pain 2019, 23, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Yu, L.; Wang, W.; Li, L.; Qin, Q.; Yu, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Rong, P.; Zhu, B. Inhibition of electroacupuncture on nociceptive responses of dorsal horn neurons evoked by noxious colorectal distention in an intensity-dependent manner. J. Pain Res. 2019, 12, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. You, H.-J.; Morch, C.D.; Chen, J.; Arendt-Nielsen, L. Simultaneous recordings of wind-up of paired spinal dorsal horn nociceptive neuron and nociceptive flexion reflex in rats. Brain Res. 2003, 960, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Viisanen, H.; Pertovaara, A. Influence of peripheral nerve injury on response properties of locus coeruleus neurons and coeruleospinal antinociception in the rat. Neuroscience 2007, 146, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hickey, L.; Li, Y.; Fyson, S.J.; Watson, T.C.; Perrins, R.; Hewinson, J.; Teschemacher, A.G.; Furue, H.; Lumb, B.M.; Pickering, A.E. Optoactivation of locus ceruleus neurons evokes bidirectional changes in thermal nociception in rats. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 4148–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ma, W.; Eisenach, J.C. Chronic constriction injury of sciatic nerve induces the up-regulation of descending inhibitory noradrenergic innervation to the lumbar dorsal horn of mice. Brain Res. 2003, 970, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Llorca-Torralba, M.; Borges, G.; Neto, F.; Mico, J.A.; Berrocoso, E. Noradrenergic locus coeruleus pathways in pain modulation. Neuroscience 2016, 338, 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Clark, F.M.; Proudfit, H.K. The projection of locus coeruleus neurons to the spinal cord in the rat determined by anterograde tracing combined with immunocytochemistry. Brain Res. 1991, 538, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Yan, C.-Q.; Hu, S.-Q.; Huo, J.-W.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Zhou, P.; Liu, C.-H.; Liu, C.-Z. Different mechanisms of contralateral-or ipsilateral-acupuncture to modulate the brain activity in patients with unilateral chronic shoulder pain: A pilot fMRI study. J. Pain Res. 2018, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yoshimura, M.; Furue, H. Mechanisms for the anti-nociceptive actions of the descending noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in the spinal cord. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 101, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Choi, S.; Yamada, A.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.K.; Furue, H. Noradrenergic inhibition of spinal hyperexcitation elicited by cutaneous cold stimuli in rats with oxaliplatin-induced allodynia: Electrophysiological and behavioral assessments. J. Physiol. Sci. 2017, 67, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, Z.; Ansah, O.; Meyerson, B.; Pertovaara, A.; Linderoth, B. Exploration of supraspinal mechanisms in effects of spinal cord stimulation: Role of the locus coeruleus. Neuroscience 2013, 253, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ren, K.; Randich, A.; Gebhart, G. Electrical stimulation of cervical vagal afferents. I. Central relays for modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission. J. Neurophysiol. 1990, 64, 1098–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Safari, M.-S.; Haghparast, A.; Semnanian, S. Effect of lidocaine administration at the nucleus locus coeruleus level on lateral hypothalamus-induced antinociception in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009, 92, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brightwell, J.J.; Taylor, B.K. Noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus contribute to neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2009, 160, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Moon, D.-O.; Park, S.-Y.; Heo, M.-S.; Kim, K.-C.; Park, C.; Ko, W.S.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, G.-Y. Key regulators in bee venom-induced apoptosis are Bcl-2 and caspase-3 in human leukemic U937 cells through downregulation of ERK and Akt. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2006, 6, 1796–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, C.; Jeong, H.; Bae, Y.; Shin, K.; Kang, S.; Kim, H.; Oh, J.; Bae, H. Targeting of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages with a melittin-based pro-apoptotic peptide. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, S.; Yu, M.; He, Y.; Xiao, L.; Wang, F.; Song, C.; Sun, S.; Ling, C.; Xu, Z. Melittin prevents liver cancer cell metastasis through inhibition of the Rac1-dependent pathway. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1964–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Soliman, C.; Eastwood, S.; Truong, V.K.; Ramsland, P.A.; Elbourne, A. The membrane effects of melittin on gastric and colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zimmermann, M. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 1983, 16, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, D.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, C.W.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, W. The Analgesic Effect of Venlafaxine and Its Mechanism on Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Yoon, C.; Wook, Y.Y.; Sik, N.H.; Ho, K.S.; Mo, C.J. Behavioral signs of ongoing pain and cold allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1994, 59, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zheng, F.; Xiao, W.-H.; Bennett, G. The response of spinal microglia to chemotherapy-evoked painful peripheral neuropathies is distinct from that evoked by traumatic nerve injuries. Neuroscience 2011, 176, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chung, G.; Kim, C.Y.; Yun, Y.-C.; Yoon, S.H.; Kim, M.-H.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, S.J. Upregulation of prefrontal metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 mediates neuropathic pain and negative mood symptoms after spinal nerve injury in rats. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Paxinos, G.; Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Hard Cover Edition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  61. Muto, Y.; Sakai, A.; Sakamoto, A.; Suzuki, H. Activation of NK1 receptors in the locus coeruleus induces analgesia through noradrenergic-mediated descending inhibition in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. De la Calle, J.L.; Paíno, C.L. A procedure for direct lumbar puncture in rats. Brain Res. Bull. 2002, 59, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 12 00775 g001 550
Figure 1. Change of behavioral hypersensitivity and body weight over time in the vincristine and control groups. Animals were intraperitoneally dosed with saline (SAL, control, n = 10) or vincristine (VIN, n = 11) once-daily for two 5-day cycles (days 1–5 and days 8–12). Rats were subjected to the behavioral evaluation just before the first dose on day 1 and between days 13 to 31, respectively (timeline: days 1, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and 31). The acetone-elicited responses were counted over 30 s post-application (A). Panels (B) and (C) illustrate the responses obtained from the VFH assays (4 or 15 g filament) that were expressed as % values: (number withdrawals × 100) / (total number of tests). The linear plot represents the mean body weight (D). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. control; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Figure 1. Change of behavioral hypersensitivity and body weight over time in the vincristine and control groups. Animals were intraperitoneally dosed with saline (SAL, control, n = 10) or vincristine (VIN, n = 11) once-daily for two 5-day cycles (days 1–5 and days 8–12). Rats were subjected to the behavioral evaluation just before the first dose on day 1 and between days 13 to 31, respectively (timeline: days 1, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, and 31). The acetone-elicited responses were counted over 30 s post-application (A). Panels (B) and (C) illustrate the responses obtained from the VFH assays (4 or 15 g filament) that were expressed as % values: (number withdrawals × 100) / (total number of tests). The linear plot represents the mean body weight (D). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. control; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Toxins 12 00775 g001
Toxins 12 00775 g002 550
Figure 2. Time course of the ameliorative effects of BV, melittin, or bvPLA2 pharmacopuncture against vincristine-induced behavioral hypersensitivity. 1mg/kg of BV, 0.5 mg/kg of melittin, 0.12 mg/kg of bvPLA2, or SAL (50 μL, control) was subcutaneously dosed at ST36 (n = 12/group). Cold and mechanical responses (A–C) were measured four times; before application and re-examined at 30, 60, and 120 min post-dosing, respectively (timeline: Before, 30, 60, and 120). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. control; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Figure 2. Time course of the ameliorative effects of BV, melittin, or bvPLA2 pharmacopuncture against vincristine-induced behavioral hypersensitivity. 1mg/kg of BV, 0.5 mg/kg of melittin, 0.12 mg/kg of bvPLA2, or SAL (50 μL, control) was subcutaneously dosed at ST36 (n = 12/group). Cold and mechanical responses (A–C) were measured four times; before application and re-examined at 30, 60, and 120 min post-dosing, respectively (timeline: Before, 30, 60, and 120). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. control; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Toxins 12 00775 g002
Toxins 12 00775 g003 550
Figure 3. The hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons in rats with vincristine-induced painful disturbance. Acetone cooling, mechanical brush, press, or pinch stimuli (A–D) were applied to the peripheral receptive field of SAL (control, n = 8) or VIN (n = 12)-administered rats, respectively. The representative raw trace from in vivo recordings of WDR neurons illustrates responses to brush or press stimuli (E). Please note that each extracellular recording was obtained per animal. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by unpaired t-test.
Figure 3. The hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons in rats with vincristine-induced painful disturbance. Acetone cooling, mechanical brush, press, or pinch stimuli (A–D) were applied to the peripheral receptive field of SAL (control, n = 8) or VIN (n = 12)-administered rats, respectively. The representative raw trace from in vivo recordings of WDR neurons illustrates responses to brush or press stimuli (E). Please note that each extracellular recording was obtained per animal. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by unpaired t-test.
Toxins 12 00775 g003
Toxins 12 00775 g004 550
Figure 4. Suppressive actions of BVA on the hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons elicited by vincristine treatments. The rate of evoked neuronal discharge to cutaneous cold, brush, press, or pinch stimuli was obtained before, 30, and 60 min after BVA (1 mg/kg, ST36) or SAL (control) application, respectively (timeline: Before, 30, and 60; n = 10/group, A–D). Representative waveforms traces from extracellular recordings of WDR neurons illustrate acetone stimuli-induced firings decreased by BVA treatment (E). Please note that one single-unit recording was obtained per rat. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. Before; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Figure 4. Suppressive actions of BVA on the hyperexcitation of spinal WDR neurons elicited by vincristine treatments. The rate of evoked neuronal discharge to cutaneous cold, brush, press, or pinch stimuli was obtained before, 30, and 60 min after BVA (1 mg/kg, ST36) or SAL (control) application, respectively (timeline: Before, 30, and 60; n = 10/group, A–D). Representative waveforms traces from extracellular recordings of WDR neurons illustrate acetone stimuli-induced firings decreased by BVA treatment (E). Please note that one single-unit recording was obtained per rat. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, vs. Before; by Bonferroni post-hoc test after two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Toxins 12 00775 g004
Toxins 12 00775 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of antagonism of spinal α-adrenergic receptors on the BVA-induced analgesia. Rats with neuropathy were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 7/group); PBS, DMSO, prazosin, or idazoxan was intrathecally injected 20 min prior to BVA (1 mg/kg, ST36), respectively. Behavioral sensitivities were assessed before the i.t. injection (Before) and 30 min after BVA (After, A–C). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by paired t-test.
Figure 5. Effects of antagonism of spinal α-adrenergic receptors on the BVA-induced analgesia. Rats with neuropathy were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 7/group); PBS, DMSO, prazosin, or idazoxan was intrathecally injected 20 min prior to BVA (1 mg/kg, ST36), respectively. Behavioral sensitivities were assessed before the i.t. injection (Before) and 30 min after BVA (After, A–C). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by paired t-test.
Toxins 12 00775 g005
Toxins 12 00775 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of LC silencing on the BVA-induced analgesia. After cannula implantations, the rats with neuropathic signs underwent microinjection of lidocaine (LIDO, 0.5 μL, 2%) or SAL (control) into LC, respectively (n = 5/group in A–C, n = 9/group in D–F). BVA (1 mg/kg) at ipsilateral ST36 was performed immediately after microinjection (D–F). Behavioral evaluations were conducted twice; prior to microinjection (Before) and 30 min after microinjection (A–C) or BVA application (D–F), respectively. Confirmation of the microinjection position (scale bar, 500 μm; AP, ‒9.84 mm from the bregma; Paxinos and Watson, 2006; (G). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by paired t-test.
Figure 6. Effects of LC silencing on the BVA-induced analgesia. After cannula implantations, the rats with neuropathic signs underwent microinjection of lidocaine (LIDO, 0.5 μL, 2%) or SAL (control) into LC, respectively (n = 5/group in A–C, n = 9/group in D–F). BVA (1 mg/kg) at ipsilateral ST36 was performed immediately after microinjection (D–F). Behavioral evaluations were conducted twice; prior to microinjection (Before) and 30 min after microinjection (A–C) or BVA application (D–F), respectively. Confirmation of the microinjection position (scale bar, 500 μm; AP, ‒9.84 mm from the bregma; Paxinos and Watson, 2006; (G). Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M.; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; by paired t-test.
Toxins 12 00775 g006
Toxins 12 00775 g007 550
Figure 7. Timeline of the investigation and schematic illustration of BVA-induced analgesia. In vivo electrophysiological and neuropharmacological tests were performed during days 16 to 25, when all three forms of hypersensitivity were significant (A). Panel (B) illustrates that BVA at the ST36 acupoint activates spinal α2-ARs via recruiting the descending noradrenergic pathway from the LC.
Figure 7. Timeline of the investigation and schematic illustration of BVA-induced analgesia. In vivo electrophysiological and neuropharmacological tests were performed during days 16 to 25, when all three forms of hypersensitivity were significant (A). Panel (B) illustrates that BVA at the ST36 acupoint activates spinal α2-ARs via recruiting the descending noradrenergic pathway from the LC.
Toxins 12 00775 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Chung, G.; Kim, S.K. The Involvement of Central Noradrenergic Pathway in the Analgesic Effect of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats. Toxins 2020, 12, 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120775

AMA Style

Li D, Chung G, Kim SK. The Involvement of Central Noradrenergic Pathway in the Analgesic Effect of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats. Toxins. 2020; 12(12):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120775

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Daxian, Geehoon Chung, and Sun Kwang Kim. 2020. "The Involvement of Central Noradrenergic Pathway in the Analgesic Effect of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats" Toxins 12, no. 12: 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120775

APA Style

Li, D., Chung, G., & Kim, S. K. (2020). The Involvement of Central Noradrenergic Pathway in the Analgesic Effect of Bee Venom Acupuncture on Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats. Toxins, 12(12), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120775

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop