Next Article in Journal
Potential Role of Platelet-Activating C-Type Lectin-Like Proteins in Viper Envenomation Induced Thrombotic Microangiopathy Symptom
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Popcorn (Zea mays var. everta) Popping Mode (Microwave, Hot Oil, and Hot Air) on Fumonisins and Deoxynivalenol Contamination Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Overview of the Anticancer Potential of the “King of Spices” Piper nigrum and Its Main Constituent Piperine
Previous Article in Special Issue
The MyToolbox EU–China Partnership—Progress and Future Directions in Mycotoxin Research and Management
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Bioactive Components of Pomegranate Oil and Their Influence on Mycotoxin Secretion

Toxins 2020, 12(12), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120748
by Ahmed Noah Badr 1,*, Hatem Salama Ali 2,3,*, Adel Gabr Abdel-Razek 4, Mohamed Gamal Shehata 5 and Najla A. Albaridi 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Toxins 2020, 12(12), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120748
Submission received: 20 September 2020 / Revised: 22 October 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 / Published: 27 November 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors presented a very interesting topic and presented the results very well. But, I doubt that you introduced and discussed the results very well. Please revise according to the comments in the PDF version attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

  • For Reviewer 1 comments:
  • Extensive editing of English and style.

  Response: The authors review the manuscript and change, correct the mistakes that displayed.

  • The introduction must be improved? 

   Response: The authors reviewed the introduction and make the changes as requested in the attached PDF file.

  • The conclusion needs some improvements.

 Response: the conclusion was rewritten again to be as good as requested.

  • A discussion needs more enhancement. 

  Response: the changes were done to enhance the discussion as it was declared in the PDF file attached.

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I found this submission as a very interesting one.
The language has minor typing mistakes, but I am not an English native speaking person to judge it.
Overall, I have a major comment, and a few minor ones:

Major: authors mention antymycotoxin secreting activity, but have not measured fungal growth. So, I cannot judge if the oil acted by inhibiting fungal growth, or acted by inhibiting mycotoxin secretion. By measuring the ratio mycotoxin / fungal biomass, one may conclude if there is inhibition, or even stimulation of mycotoxins.

Authors should consider this comment in a possible revised version.


Minor: authors used data with a lot of significant digits. For instance, in line 109 they reported 66.03 %; how are you so sure it is 66.03 %, and not just 66 %?
Use an appropriate abbreviation for zearalenone. ZN is not a common one.

Author Response

Response for the comments of the reviewer 2

  • Minor English revision. 

  the Response: Authors have reviewed the manuscript and correct the discovered mistakes.

 

  • Major: authors mention antimycotoxin secreting activity, but have not measured fungal growth. 

    Authors should consider this comment in a possible revised version.

 The response: this part of the study was corrected and was added as 

It is worth mentioning that; inhibition ratios of the fungal mycelial-growth for some strains that counted as mycotoxin-producers were recorded at 17.4%, 12.1%, and 25.6% for A.flavus ITEM 698, A. parasiticus ITEM 11, and F. culmorum KF 846, respectively."

 

  • Minor: authors used data with a lot of significant digits. For instance, in line 109 they reported 66.03 %; how are you so sure it is 66.03%, and not just 66 %?

 The response: these results recorded as a calculation ratio, and in the correction step it was approximated as it was requested.

 

  •  Use an appropriate abbreviation for zearalenone. ZN is not a common one.

The response: this abbreviation was corrected to be ZEA instead of ZN.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All comments and suggestions have been addressed.

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have answered my comments.

Back to TopTop