Previous Article in Journal
Anemia Profile in Elite Israeli Olympic-Level Athletes—Is Screening Necessary?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis

1
Department of Surgery, Oncology, Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy
2
Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, 35128 Padua, Italy
3
Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany
4
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy
5
Department of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
6
Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(24), 3828; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243828 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 November 2025 / Revised: 29 November 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 6 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition Methodology & Assessment)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Large language models (LLMs) show promise for patient education, yet their safety and efficacy for chronic diseases requiring lifelong management remain unclear. This study presents the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of three leading LLMs for celiac disease patient education. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation comparing ChatGPT-4, Claude 3.7, and Gemini 2.0 using six blinded clinical specialists (four gastroenterologists and two dietitians). Twenty questions spanning four domains (general understanding, symptoms/diagnosis, diet/nutrition, lifestyle management) were evaluated for scientific accuracy, clarity (5-point Likert scales), misinformation presence, and readability using validated computational metrics (Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG index). Results: Gemini 2.0 demonstrated superior performance across multiple dimensions. Gemini 2.0 achieved the highest scientific accuracy ratings (median 4.5 [IQR: 4.5–5.0] vs. 4.0 [IQR: 4.0–4.5] for both competitors, p = 0.015) and clarity scores (median 5.0 [IQR: 4.5–5.0] vs. 4.0 [IQR: 4.0–4.5], p = 0.011). While Gemini 2.0 showed numerically lower misinformation rates (13.3% vs. 23.3% for ChatGPT–4 and 24.2% for Claude 3.7), differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.778). Gemini 2.0 achieved significantly superior readability, requiring approximately 2–3 fewer years of education for comprehension (median Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level 9.8 [IQR: 8.8–10.3] vs. 12.5 for both competitors, p < 0.001). However, all models exceeded recommended 6th–8th grade health literacy targets. Conclusions: While Gemini 2.0 demonstrated statistically significant advantages in accuracy, clarity, and readability, misinformation rates of 13.3–24.2% across all models represent concerning risk levels for direct patient applications. AI offers valuable educational support but requires healthcare provider supervision until misinformation rates improve.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; patient education; gluten; health literacy artificial intelligence; patient education; gluten; health literacy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bertin, L.; Branchi, F.; Ciacci, C.; Lee, A.R.; Sanders, D.S.; Trott, N.; Zingone, F. Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243828

AMA Style

Bertin L, Branchi F, Ciacci C, Lee AR, Sanders DS, Trott N, Zingone F. Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis. Nutrients. 2025; 17(24):3828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243828

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bertin, Luisa, Federica Branchi, Carolina Ciacci, Anne R. Lee, David S. Sanders, Nick Trott, and Fabiana Zingone. 2025. "Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis" Nutrients 17, no. 24: 3828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243828

APA Style

Bertin, L., Branchi, F., Ciacci, C., Lee, A. R., Sanders, D. S., Trott, N., & Zingone, F. (2025). Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis. Nutrients, 17(24), 3828. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243828

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop