Next Article in Journal
Diet and Muscle Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Mediterranean Diet Adherence During Pregnancy on Preeclampsia, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, and Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tailoring the Nutritional Composition of Italian Foods to the US Nutrition5k Dataset for Food Image Recognition: Challenges and a Comparative Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Power of Databases in Unraveling the Nutrition–Health Connection

by
Andreu Farran-Codina
1,2,* and
Mireia Urpí-Sardà
1,2,3
1
Departament de Nutrició, Ciències de l’Alimentació i Gastronomia, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l’Alimentació, Campus de l’Alimentació de Torribera, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08921 Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain
2
Institut de Recerca en Nutrició i Seguretat Alimentària (INSA-UB), Campus de l’Alimentació de Torribera, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08921 Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Spain
3
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(10), 1725; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101725
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Accepted: 14 May 2025 / Published: 20 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Databases, Nutrition and Human Health)
Human activities across different sectors produce large volumes of relevant nutritional information. These data, which are derived from various sources (food analysis, consumption surveys, health monitoring, or environmental assessments) are systematically gathered and organized in databases. These databases are a crucial tool for contemporary nutrition research. By structuring and integrating these varied datasets, researchers can identify patterns, associations, and trends that enhance our understanding of the intricate link between nutrition and health [1]. The increasing volume and complexity of nutrition data necessitate advanced analytical approaches, and in this context, artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative force. Techniques like text mining, a branch of AI focused on extracting insights from textual data, are proving invaluable for leveraging the wealth of information contained within nutritional databases and related sources.
Consequently, databases are vital for organizing knowledge, enabling the creation of new data that enhances and expands scientific understanding. They have a role in multiple areas, such as analyzing nutrient consumption and food contaminants, or assessing how dietary patterns affect health outcomes. The elaboration and validation of dietary guidelines and the formulation of evidence-based policies require the use of extensive and complex nutritional and health databases because of the growing complexity of dietary patterns, food supply chains, and the relationship between eating habits and metabolic diseases [2]. To further enhance the power of these databases, machine learning (ML), another key area within AI, is playing an increasingly significant role [3]. ML algorithms can analyze vast datasets within nutritional databases to uncover intricate relationships and build predictive models that go beyond traditional statistical methods.
One of the most exciting and promising uses of nutritional databases is their combination with metabolomics data, allowing scientists to study how our bodies biochemically react to various dietary components. Metabolomics is key to discovering objective food intake biomarkers, which improve upon self-reported dietary data [4]. While metabolomic profiling is advancing biomarker identification and applications in nutrition research are growing, the field faces challenges. These include the crucial need for validated biomarkers and specialized databases of food-derived metabolites [4]. In addition, the application of ontologies like the Food-Biomarker Ontology (FOBI) facilitates the connection between food intake data and metabolomic profiles, leading to more precise dietary assessments [5]. Metabolomics is especially important in precision nutrition, where understanding individual metabolic responses is crucial for providing personalized dietary advice. By merging metabolomics databases with traditional food composition databases, researchers can more accurately predict the impact of diet on health and disease prevention [6]. Recent advancements in AI and ML are further enhancing this field, enabling the creation of predictive models that customize dietary recommendations to meet individual needs [7].
Databases are also driving innovation in food analysis and description. Standardizing food composition datasets across different regions and dietary traditions is critical for improving AI-driven applications in food recognition and dietary assessment. A great example is the FAO/INFOODS initiative, which has worked to harmonize food composition tables, ensuring data consistency on a global scale [8]. In Europe, the international association EuroFIR provides standardized and validated information on the composition of foods marketed in different European countries [9]. These efforts not only facilitate research but also boost AI-based tools designed for personalized nutrition and health monitoring. Recent studies have shown how AI and ML are transforming clinical nutrition, improving decision-making, predicting nutritional deficiencies, and optimizing dietary interventions in critical care settings [10].
This Special Issue dedicated to “Databases, Nutrition and Health” gathers diverse studies united by their reliance on databases to address critical questions across the spectrum of nutrition and health. As the reader will find within these pages, the effective use and development of databases are fundamental for progress—from shaping public health policies and interventions using large-scale surveillance insights to enhancing clinical decision-making and even ensuring food safety. The contributions herein exemplify these crucial and diverse roles, tackling specific challenges and showcasing innovations across various domains. For instance, the importance of robust databases for public health policy and surveillance is clearly highlighted by Al Jawaldeh et al., who reviews national nutrition surveillance systems in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the critical need for data integration and standardization, especially in fragile settings. Bridging the gap between different food cultures and technologies, Bianco et al. address the intricate challenges of adapting and harmonizing food composition databases (FCDBs)—in their case, Italian data for the US Nutrition5k dataset—essential for training reliable AI-driven food image recognition tools. The power of large-scale epidemiological databases is demonstrated by Li et al., using NHANES data to reveal how adequate dietary fiber intake might mitigate the detrimental impact of environmental contaminants like blood lead on dyslipidemia risk among US adults. In the clinical sphere, Garcia-Arenas et al. underscore the necessity for specialized, up-to-date databases by creating and applying a database of special low-protein foods (SLPFs) to optimize dietary management for patients with inborn errors of metabolism, showing how SLPF intake impacts dietary patterns and biochemical profiles. Expanding into gene–diet interactions, Lee et al. leverage longitudinal cohort data (KoGES) to show how food group intake (like fruits, meat, or beverages) can significantly modify the risk of insomnia associated with specific CLOCK gene polymorphisms, highlighting sex-specific differences. Finally, offering a critical perspective on the evidence base itself, Kamioka et al. assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews supporting ‘Foods with Function Claims’ (FFC) in Japan, finding significant deficiencies in aspects like protocol registration, search strategies, and risk of bias assessment, thus emphasizing the importance of rigorous methodology when using databases for regulatory claims.
Looking ahead, the evolution of nutritional databases is anticipated to feature more sophisticated algorithms for data analysis, better procedures to ensure data quality, improved accessibility for researchers and policymakers, and the better integration of real-time health monitoring tools. As datasets grow and become more interconnected, the collaboration between nutrition science, technology, and public health will strengthen, leading to more accurate dietary recommendations and effective health interventions. The contributions to this Special Issue highlight the essential role of databases in advancing nutrition research, underscoring the need for continuous refinement, harmonization, and innovation in the field.

Author Contributions

Both authors have contributed equally to the drafting, review and final approval of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Al Jawaldeh, A.; El Hajj Hassan, O.; Qureshi, A.B.; Zerbo, F.C.; Alahnoumy, S.; Bozo, M.; Al-Halaika, M.; Al-Dakheel, M.H.; Alhamdan, L.; Mujib, S.A.; et al. Qualitative Review of National Nutrition Surveillance Systems in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3689. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15173689.
  • Bianco, R.; Marinoni, M.; Coluccia, S.; Carioni, G.; Fiori, F.; Gnagnarella, P.; Edefonti, V.; Parpinel, M. Tailoring the Nutritional Composition of Italian Foods to the US Nutrition5k Dataset for Food Image Recognition: Challenges and a Comparative Analysis. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3339. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16193339.
  • Li, B.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, H.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, W.; Hu, A. Adequate Intake of Dietary Fiber May Relieve the Detrimental Impact of Blood Lead on Dyslipidemia among US Adults: A Study of Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Database. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4434. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204434.
  • Garcia-Arenas, D.; Barrau-Martinez, B.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A.; Llorach, R.; Campistol-Plana, J.; García-Cazorla, A.; Ormazabal, A.; Urpi-Sarda, M. Effect of Special Low-Protein Foods Consumption in the Dietary Pattern and Biochemical Profile of Patients with Inborn Errors of Protein Metabolism: Application of a Database of Special Low-Protein Foods. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15153475.
  • Lee, S. Association between CLOCK Gene Polymorphisms and Insomnia Risk According to Food Groups: A KoGES Longitudinal Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15102300.
  • Kamioka, H.; Origasa, H.; Tsutani, K.; Kitayuguchi, J.; Yoshizaki, T.; Shimada, M.; Wada, Y.; Takano-Ohmuro, H. A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15092047.

References

  1. Tao, D.; Yang, P.; Feng, H. Utilization of text mining as a big data analysis tool for food science and nutrition. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 875–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Greenfield, H.; Southgate, D.A.T. Food Composition Data: Production, Management and Use, 2nd ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirk, D.; Kok, E.; Tufano, M.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Camps, G. Machine Learning in Nutrition Research. Adv. Nutr. 2022, 13, 2573–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brennan, L. Biomarkers of food intake: Current status and future opportunities. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2025, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Castellano-Escuder, P.; González-Domínguez, R.; Wishart, D.S.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Sánchez-Pla, A. FOBI: An ontology to represent food intake data and associate it with metabolomic data. Database 2020, 2020, baaa033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Misra, B.B. New software tools, databases, and resources in metabolomics: Updates from 2020. Metabolomics 2021, 17, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kirk, D.; Catal, C.; Tekinerdogan, B. Precision nutrition: A systematic literature review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 133, 104365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. FAO. FAO/INFOODS Food Composition Databases. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/en/ (accessed on 19 April 2025).
  9. Durazzo, A.; Astley, S.; Kapsokefalou, M.; Costa, H.S.; Mantur-Vierendeel, A.; Pijls, L.; Bucchini, L.; Glibetić, M.; Presser, K.; Finglas, P. Food Composition Data and Tools Online and Their Use in Research and Policy: EuroFIR AISBL Contribution in 2022. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Singer, P.; Robinson, E.; Raphaeli, O. The future of artificial intelligence in clinical nutrition. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2024, 27, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farran-Codina, A.; Urpí-Sardà, M. The Power of Databases in Unraveling the Nutrition–Health Connection. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101725

AMA Style

Farran-Codina A, Urpí-Sardà M. The Power of Databases in Unraveling the Nutrition–Health Connection. Nutrients. 2025; 17(10):1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farran-Codina, Andreu, and Mireia Urpí-Sardà. 2025. "The Power of Databases in Unraveling the Nutrition–Health Connection" Nutrients 17, no. 10: 1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101725

APA Style

Farran-Codina, A., & Urpí-Sardà, M. (2025). The Power of Databases in Unraveling the Nutrition–Health Connection. Nutrients, 17(10), 1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop