Next Article in Journal
Omega-3 (n-3) Fatty Acid–Statin Interaction: Evidence for a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Nourishing Conversations: Using Motivational Interviewing in a Community Teaching Kitchen to Promote Healthy Eating via a Food as Medicine Intervention
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 7
10.3390/nu16070961
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Deciles Ratio with All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

by
Orna Reges
1,2,*,
Tsafnat Test
3,4,
Dror Dicker
5,6,* and
Tomas Karpati
7
1
Department of Health Systems Management, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
2
Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv 6209804, Israel
3
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel
4
Clalit Health Services, Southern District, Yerucham 8050315, Israel
5
Internal Medicine D and Obesity Clinic, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4937211, Israel
6
Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
7
Department of Digital Technologies in Medicine, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon 5810201, Israel
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(7), 961; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070961
Submission received: 5 February 2024 / Revised: 18 March 2024 / Accepted: 20 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Epidemiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Given the importance and continued interest in finding a simple, accessible, and universal measure which reflects both general and abdominal adiposity, this study tested for an association of the ratio of WC decile to BMI decile (WC-d/BMI-d) with all-cause mortality. Individuals aged 18–79 years who had participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during the years 2007 to 2018 were included in the analysis. WC and BMI deciles were defined separately for males and females, while WC-d/BMI-d was calculated for each individual. The association of WC-d/BMI-d with mortality was assessed using logistic models for the total study population, and then again after stratification by sex, ethnicity, morbidity level, and BMI categories. Positive associations between WC-d/BMI-d and mortality were demonstrated for the total study population (adjusted OR = 1.545, 95%CI: 1.369–1.722) and within different sub-groups, including the population with a normal BMI level (adjusted OR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.13–1.50). WC-d/BMI-d increased with age, with ~40 years representing a critical time point when WC-d surpasses BMI-d, with a sharper incline for males as compared to females. WC-d/BMI-d was significantly associated with all-cause mortality amongst NHANES American adults; thus, measurements of WC and its integration with BMI in this metric should be considered in clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Obesity, characterized by abnormal or excessive fat accumulation, is increasing in prevalence worldwide [1]. There are several anthropometric indices which aim to define obesity, of which the most widespread is body mass index (BMI), calculated as the ratio between body mass and height squared [2,3]. This index defines four main categories: Underweight, Normal weight, Overweight, and Obese. The BMI cutoffs for these four categories are the same for males and females, and all ages (above 18 years). The major limitation of BMI lies in its inability to measure fat distribution or visceral fat [4,5,6], which were found to be risk factors for cardiometabolic morbidity [7]. One of the common anthropometric indices used to measure central fat distribution is waist circumference (WC) [4,8]. Unlike BMI, the measurement of WC is less standardized [9] and there are diverse cutoffs by gender and different ethnic groups (e.g., according to the World Health Organization (WHO), for people of European origin, >80 cm for females and >94 cm for males, and for people of Asian ethnicity, >80 for females and >90 for males [10,11]; while according to the American Heart Association (AHA), >88 cm for females and >102 cm for males) [12]. Both indices, BMI and WC, increase with age [13,14], with a greater increase for WC [15], yet changes in WC relative to BMI, especially for a given BMI category, are not fully understood.
The association of obesity with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality is well established [6,16,17]. Both BMI and WC have been found to be independent risk factors for CVD and mortality [18,19,20,21]. Furthermore, a recently published Consensus Statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) and International Chair on Cardiometabolic Risk (ICCR) Working Group on Visceral Obesity argued that BMI alone is not sufficient to assess cardiometabolic risk. This Consensus Statement proposed WC as an additional important measurement [22] and emphasized the importance of considering WC within the specific BMI categories. Indeed, several studies have shown that an increase in WC within each BMI category was associated with increased mortality risk [23,24,25]. Few studies have also recommended using an index which combines BMI and WC in order to assess its association with morbidity and mortality, especially in middle-aged and older populations [26,27,28]. For instance, Liu et al. used the ratio between continuous values of WC and BMI to demonstrate higher risk for mortality associated with this obesity phenotype [26]. A meta-analysis by Jayedi et al. [27] demonstrated a significant positive association of a body shape index (ABSI, defined as WC (cm)/[BMI2/3 × height (cm)1/2]) [29] and all-cause mortality risk.
Given the importance of and continued interest in finding a simple, accessible, and universal measure which reflects these two obesity-related metrics, the current study suggests using the ratio of WC decile and BMI decile (WC-d/BMI-d). This metric can be used to identify a different phenotype of obesity, specifically the increase in this ratio indicates a change from obesity with general fat distribution to a form with central fat distribution. The objectives of this study are to (1) describe the distribution of the population by obesity level using WC-d/BMI-d; (2) assess the association of this metric with all-cause mortality; and (3) observe changes in WC-d/BMI-d with increasing age, stratified by sex and BMI categories.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

De-identified and publicly available data were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which can be accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm (accessed on 15 March 2023). NHANES is a cross-sectional representative survey of non-institutionalized citizens in the United States, which collects data every 2 years. The sample for the survey was selected to represent the U.S. population of all ages. For this study, individuals aged 18–79 years who had participated in NHANES during the years 2007 to 2018 were selected. Individuals with missing BMI or WC, individuals with BMI below 18, and pregnant women were excluded from the analysis.

2.2. Main Exposure (WC-d/BMI-d) and Covariates

WC and BMI deciles were defined separately for males and females. For each gender, individuals were sorted in ascending order based on their WC values, and the range of values was divided into ten equal deciles. Similarly, deciles were defined for BMI. Once individuals were assigned to their respective WC and BMI deciles, these deciles were encoded numerically from 1 to 10, and the ratio between the encoding for both measures (WC-d/BMI-d) was calculated for each individual. A WC-d/BMI-d equal to 1 indicated that an individual ranked in the same decile for BMI and WC. Ratios greater than 1 suggested that an individual ranked in a higher WC decile relative to their BMI decile, while ratios less than 1 indicated the opposite.
Demographic measures (age, ethnicity, and smoking category), clinical measures (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), glucose, cholesterol (low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), and triglycerides), and chronic diagnoses (diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), renal disease, and asthma) were selected as possible covariates. Individuals were defined as non-morbid, morbid (having 1 of the above chronic diseases), or multi-morbid (having ≥ 2 of the above chronic diseases).

2.3. Outcomes

The primary outcome of this study was overall mortality. For NHANES participants, mortality status was ascertained through a probabilistic algorithm for record matching with the National Death Index at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-linkage/mortality-public.htm (accessed on 15 March 2023).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The main characteristics for the total study population and populations stratified by sex were described for categorical variables using proportions, and for continuous variables using means with standard deviations (SD) or medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Differences between males and females were assessed using the Chi-Square test for categorial variables. Differences in continuous variables were evaluated using unpaired t-tests for variables with normal distribution or the Mann–Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables.
The association of WC-decile/BMI-decile (as a continuous variable) with mortality was assessed using logistic models for the total study population and for populations stratified by sex, ethnicity, morbidity level, and BMI categories. The model for the entire population was adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, morbidity level, and BMI. An additional model was utilized to account for each chronic disease as an independent variable. Stratified models were adjusted for all covariates except the covariate used for stratification. A forest plot graph was used to describe the odds ratios of the unadjusted and adjusted models.
Linear regression models were used to assess the independent association of age with WC-d/BMI-d for the total study population and populations stratified by sex and BMI categories. The linear model for the total population was adjusted for gender, ethnicity, co-morbidity, and BMI. Stratified models were adjusted for all covariates except the covariate used for stratification.
All the analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.0.2. 3 [30].

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics

Of the 59,842 individuals who participated in NHANES during the years 2007 to 2018, there were 34,198 individuals aged 18–79 years. Of these, 3900 were excluded due to (1) missing BMI or WC data (3001), (2) BMI < 18.5 (570), or (3) pregnancy at the time of inclusion (329). Individuals with missing BMI or WC were more likely to have diabetes (15.7%), CAD (4.8%), and CHF (5.7%), as well as higher all-cause mortality (12.8%), than those included in the analysis. The final study population consisted of 30,298 individuals (mean age: 46.4 ± 17.1 years, 50.3% female). The main characteristics of the study population are described in Table 1. The mean BMI level of the participants was 29.3 ± 6.8 (male: 28.8 ± 6.0; female: 29.8 ± 7.5) and the mean WC was 99.3 ± 16.5 (male: 100.7 ± 16.1; female: 97.8 ± 16.8).

3.2. WC-d/BMI-d Distribution

Figure 1 (A + B) visualizes the distribution of the study population by WC and BMI deciles. For both males and females, about 40% (39.8% and 41%, respectively) ranked on the same decile of BMI and WC, meaning that they had a WC-d/BMI-d equal to 1 (represented by the white diagonal). About 30% (29.9%, and 29.6%, respectively) were ranked on a higher decile for WC than for BMI, meaning that they had a WC-d/BMI-d greater than 1 (above the diagonal in red). The remaining 30% (29.7% and 29%, respectively) were ranked on a lower decile for WC than BMI, meaning that they had a WC-d/BMI-d less than 1 (below the diagonal in green).
When looking only at the ~30% of individuals who ranked on a higher decile for WC relative to BMI, this percentage can be further divided into 11.1%, 11.5%, and 7.3% for normal BMI, overweight, and obesity, respectively, in the male population, and 10.7%, 10.3%, and 8.6%, respectively, in the female population. For the ~30% of individuals who ranked lower for WC than BMI, this percentage can be divided into 5.5%, 10.8%, and 13.4% for normal BMI, overweight, and obesity, respectively, for males, and 5.5%, 10.4%, and 13.1%, respectively, for females.

3.3. Association of WC-d/BMI-d with All-Cause Mortality

Associations of WC-d/BMI-d with all-cause mortality are described in Figure 2. Among the total population, a higher risk was observed as the ratio between WC-d and BMI-d increased (adjusted OR = 1.545, 95%CI: 1.369–1.722). An additional model which accounted for each chronic disease as an independent variable yielded consistent results (adjusted OR = 1.537; 95%CI: 1.360–1.714).
The significant association was preserved separately for males (adjusted OR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.33–1.79); females (adjusted OR = 1.51; 95%CI: 1.22–1.79; Non-Hispanic White (adjusted OR = 1.45; 95%CI: 1.23–1.67); Non-Hispanic Black (adjusted OR = 1.77; 95%CI: 1.33–2.21); individuals with one morbidity (adjusted OR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.31–1.98); individuals with multi-morbidities (adjusted OR = 1.72; 95%CI: 1.40–2.05); individuals with normal BMI levels (adjusted OR = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.13–1.50); individuals with overweight (adjusted OR = 1.87; 95%CI: 1.30–2.43); and individuals with obesity (adjusted OR = 3.69; 95%CI: 1.38–6.00). No significant associations were demonstrated for Mexican Americans (adjusted OR = 1.84; 95%CI: 0.96–2.73); Other Race (adjusted OR = 1.37; 95%CI: 0.76–1.98), or individuals free of chronic disease (adjusted OR = 1.20; 95%CI: 0.93–1.47).

Association of Age with WC-d/BMI-d

Multivariable linear regression demonstrated a significant positive association of age with WC-d/BMI-d (0.008, p < 0.001).
When stratified by sex (p < 0.001 for age × sex), a similar significant increasing trend of WC-d/BMI-d with age was found for males (0.013, p < 0.001) and females (0.008, p < 0.001), with greater increases for males (Figure 3A). Specifically, around the age of 40 years, this ratio was greater than 1 for both males and females.
Similarly, the association of age with WC-d/BMI-d (p < 0.001 for age x BMI categories) was also significant in all of the BMI groups examined (normal weight: 0.010, p < 0.001; overweight: 0.006, p < 0.001; and obesity: 0.002, p < 0.001), with the greatest increases found in individuals with a normal BMI level (Figure 3B). The age at which the ratio became greater than 1 differs in the different BMI categories, with an increase as the BMI category increased: age ~25 in individuals with normal BMI, age ~50 in individuals with over-weight, and ~60 in individuals with obesity.
The line depicts the overall trend based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) and its 95% confidence interval of WC-d/BMI-d. The dots represent individual data points along that trend.

4. Discussion

In this study, amongst adults who had participated in NHANES during the years 2007 to 2018, WC-d/BMI-d was significantly and directly associated with mortality, with increased risk as the ratio between WC-d and BMI-d increased. The significant association was preserved even after adjustment for BMI level, as well as separately for males and females, and within the different BMI sub-groups. About one-third of the population had a higher decile for WC than for BMI (i.e., WC-d/BMI-d greater than 1). Furthermore, WC-d/BMI-d increased with age in both males and females, with age ~40 years representing a critical time point when WC-d surpassed BMI-d. There was a sharper incline for males as compared to females. The association of age with WC-d/BMI-d was also observed separately for BMI sub-groups, with the greatest increases among individuals with normal BMI levels.
The association between BMI and mortality is well established [6,16,17,28,31,32]. WC has also been found to be a strong risk factor for mortality even when adjusting for BMI [23,28,31,33,34] and sometimes even stronger than BMI [32]. Previous studies that considered both WC and BMI either assessed the association of WC with mortality stratified by BMI groups or used different variations of an integrated index of WC and BMI. Studies that stratified results by BMI groups demonstrated varied findings with some evidence for associations between WC and mortality across all BMI groups [23,34], and some showing associations only in specific BMI groups [32,35,36]. Similar to previous studies where WC and BMI were integrated into a single index [26,27], the present study observed an elevated risk associated with an increase in the combined index. A meta-analysis by Jayedi et al. [27] expanded on the significant association between the index ABSI with all-cause mortality by indicating that heterogeneity in potential risk could be attributed to differences between sub-groups based on BMI or pre-existing diseases. Heterogeneity in mortality risk was also demonstrated in this study.
A recent Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity emphasized the importance of considering WC within the specific BMI categories [22]. In the current study, the inclusion of one measure, which contains information about the ratio between WC deciles and BMI deciles, allowed for an analysis of the risk of these combined factors on mortality overall, and also within the different sub-groups such as sex and BMI categories. A significant association of WC-d/BMI-d with mortality was demonstrated separately for all BMI categories. The significant association observed among individuals with a normal BMI level is of particular interest. From a clinical perspective, individuals with a normal BMI level are considered low-risk; however, with the addition of the WC-d/BMI-d index emerges a sub-group, within the normal BMI group, of individuals with increased risk for mortality. The significant association between the increase in WC-d/BMI-d and mortality in the overweight and obese BMI categories is also important to note, as it signifies that this association remained consistent across the different groups.
Using deciles to segment the population in the current study allowed for a more precise visualization of the distribution of the population based on these two health-related metrics. This visualization enabled the identification of homogenous clusters of individuals at higher risk for mortality (WC-d/BMI-d higher than 1) in the total population and within the different BMI groups. Specifically, about a third of the population had a higher decile for WC than for BMI, which comprised ~11% normal BMI, ~12% overweight, and ~7% individuals with obesity.
Previous studies demonstrated linear increases in WC with age [13]; furthermore, there is evidence indicating that WC is increasing at a steeper incline than expected considering a given BMI level [22]. In the current study, in both sexes and for all BMI categories, there was an increase in WC-d/BMI-d with age. This increase was steeper among males as compared to females, and in normal BMI as compared to other BMI categories. Integrating WC and BMI into a single metric in the current study facilitates the evaluation and confirmation of the different phenotypes of obesity and how they change with age.
Less is known about the critical time periods when WC increases relative to BMI. The current study indicates that there may be critical time windows when this ratio changes and that these time windows differ in relation to the different sub-groups. While for the total population there seems to be a change at ~40 years where WC-d increases relative to BMI-d, when looking at individuals in the different BMI categories, the age at which this change happened increased with the increase in BMI category (~25 years for normal, ~50 years for overweight, and ~60 years for obesity). Therefore, follow-up at younger age may be beneficial in identifying individuals with higher risk for mortality based on higher WC-d/BMI-d, especially among individuals with a normal BMI. The differences between the different sub-groups also emphasizes the importance of a more individualized approach to assessing risk using these measures. Longitudinal studies are necessary to refine these specific time windows and more deeply understand their significance.
A strength of this study was the utilization of a simple, accessible, and easily interpretable measure that reflects and combines two crucial obesity-related metrics: BMI and WC. Furthermore, employing deciles to partition the study populations provided a higher level of detail for illustrating the distribution of the population based on WC and BMI. Using deciles also facilitated the application of WC-d/BMI-d in different populations with varying distributions of WC and BMI. Subsequent studies should assess this decile-based metric for additional populations and diverse ethnic groups. Lastly, the large sample size from a well-established US cohort allowed for the performance of stratified analyses and demonstrated the robustness of the positive association between WC-d/BMI-d and mortality. This study also has limitations. First is the observational nature of the study and the potential of residual confounding, even after accounting for potential confounders. Second, 3001 individuals were excluded from the analysis due to missing BMI or WC data. These individuals were more likely to be morbid and had higher all-cause mortality than those included in the analysis, potentially impacting the generalizability of the results. Third, due to the cross-sectional nature of NHANES, measurements of WC and BMI were captured only at a single time point, providing a snapshot rather than facilitating a dynamic understanding of their trajectories. This absence of longitudinal evidence restricts the ability to identify and consider changes in WC and BMI over time. Future studies should prioritize longitudinal study designs, which enable the consideration of the trajectories of WC and BMI.

5. Conclusions

WC-d/BMI-d was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in the NHANES American adults. Measurements of WC and its integration with BMI in this metric should be considered in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.R., T.T., D.D. and T.K.; methodology, O.R. and T.K.; software, T.K.; validation, O.R., T.T., D.D. and T.K.; formal analysis, T.K.; data curation, T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, O.R. and T.T., writing—review and editing, O.R., T.T., D.D. and T.K.; visualization, T.K.; supervision, O.R., T.K. and D.D.; funding acquisition, O.R. and T.K.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project received internal funding from Ariel University, Israel, and Holon Institute of Technology, Israel, with the aim of fostering collaboration between researchers from these two academic institutions (grant number: RA2200000096).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The NHANES study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Centre for Health Statistics and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm (accessed on 15 March 2023)) and informed consent was signed by all recruited participants. The current study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Ariel University (AU-HEA-OR-20230215, approval on 15 February 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was signed by all participants recruited to the NHANES study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during for this study are available in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/ (accessed on 15 March 2023).

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff at the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control for designing, collecting, and collating the NHANES data and creating the public database. We also thank all the generous voluntary participation of the U.S. residents who gave their personal time to make the NHANES surveys possible. We thank Danna Pinto from the Research Lab for CVD Epidemiology and Prevention at Ariel University for editing and helping prepare the paper for publication. Also, we thank the students from the Health System’s management department excellence program at Ariel University for their involvement in the literature review for the paper: Shiraz Aharoni, Rinat Greenberg, Ira Gaidishev, and Limor Beshari. In addition, we thank the student Maxim Melichov from the department of Digital Technologies in Medicine at Holon Institute of Technology who assisted with data pre-processing. Reges and Karpati thank Ariel University and Holon Institute of Technology for their support. Lastly, we would like to thank Debby Mir for assisting in editing the paper to prepare the final template for submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bray, G.A.; Heisel, W.E.; Afshin, A.; Jensen, M.D.; Dietz, W.H.; Long, M.; Kushner, R.F.; Daniels, S.R.; Wadden, T.A.; Tsai, A.G.; et al. The Science of Obesity Management: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 79–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Flegal, K.M. Commentary: The Quest for Weight Standards. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO Expert Committee. Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry; Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization Technical Report Series; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995; Volume 854, pp. 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oliveros, E.; Somers, V.K.; Sochor, O.; Goel, K.; Lopez-Jimenez, F. The Concept of Normal Weight Obesity. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014, 56, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Lorenzo, A.; Bianchi, A.; Maroni, P.; Iannarelli, A.; Di Daniele, N.; Iacopino, L.; Di Renzo, L. Adiposity Rather than BMI Determines Metabolic Risk. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 166, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Lorenzo, A.; Gratteri, S.; Gualtieri, P.; Cammarano, A.; Bertucci, P.; Di Renzo, L. Why Primary Obesity Is a Disease? J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mathieu, P.; Poirier, P.; Pibarot, P.; Lemieux, I.; Després, J.P. Visceral Obesity the Link among Inflammation, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease. Hypertension 2009, 53, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Piqueras, P.; Ballester, A.; Durá-Gil, J.V.; Martinez-Hervas, S.; Redón, J.; Real, J.T. Anthropometric Indicators as a Tool for Diagnosis of Obesity and Other Health Risk Factors: A Literature Review. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 631179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alberti, K.G.M.M.; Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Cleeman, J.I.; Donato, K.A.; Fruchart, J.-C.; James, W.P.T.; Loria, C.M.; Smith, S.C. Harmonizing the Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation 2009, 120, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 8–11 December 2008; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. World Health Association. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jensen, M.D.; Ryan, D.H.; Apovian, C.M.; Ard, J.D.; Comuzzie, A.G.; Donato, K.A.; Hu, F.B.; Hubbard, V.S.; Jakicic, J.M.; Kushner, R.F.; et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 2985–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stevens, J.; Katz, E.G.; Huxley, R.R. Associations between Gender, Age and Waist Circumference. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M.; Scott, J.A.; Der, G.; Lean, M.E.J.; Burns, C.M. Changes in Weight and Waist Circumference over 9 Years in a Scottish Population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 62, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Walls, H.L.; Stevenson, C.E.; Mannan, H.R.; Abdullah, A.; Reid, C.M.; McNeil, J.J.; Peeters, A. Comparing Trends in BMI and Waist Circumference. Obesity 2011, 19, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Powell-Wiley, T.M.; Poirier, P.; Burke, L.E.; Després, J.P.; Gordon-Larsen, P.; Lavie, C.J.; Lear, S.A.; Ndumele, C.E.; Neeland, I.J.; Sanders, P.; et al. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021, 143, e984–e1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khafagy, R.; Dash, S. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: The Emerging Role of Inflammation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 768119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, H.; Cupples, L.A.; Stokes, A.; Liu, C.T. Association of Obesity with Mortality Over 24 Years of Weight History: Findings From the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA Netw. Open 2018, 1, e184587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cibičková, L.; Langová, K.; Vaverková, H.; Lukeš, J.; Cibiček, N.; Karásek, D. Superior Role of Waist Circumference to Body-Mass Index in the Prediction of Cardiometabolic Risk in Dyslipidemic Patients. Physiol. Res. 2019, 68, 931–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.; Liu, S.; Qiao, Y.; Li, G.; Wu, Y.; Ke, C. Waist-to-Height Ratio, Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, Waist Divided by Height0.5 and the Risk of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: A National Longitudinal Cohort Study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2644–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, L.; Gao, B.; Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Wu, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; et al. Joint Association of Body Mass Index and Central Obesity with Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Prediabetic Population: A Prospective Cohort Study. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 13, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ross, R.; Neeland, I.J.; Yamashita, S.; Shai, I.; Seidell, J.; Magni, P.; Santos, R.D.; Arsenault, B.; Cuevas, A.; Hu, F.B.; et al. Waist Circumference as a Vital Sign in Clinical Practice: A Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cerhan, J.R.; Moore, S.C.; Jacobs, E.J.; Kitahara, C.M.; Rosenberg, P.S.; Adami, H.O.; Ebbert, J.O.; English, D.R.; Gapstur, S.M.; Giles, G.G.; et al. A Pooled Analysis of Waist Circumference and Mortality in 650,000 Adults. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014, 89, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lassale, C.; Tzoulaki, I.; Moons, K.G.M.; Sweeting, M.; Boer, J.; Johnson, L.; Huerta, J.M.; Agnoli, C.; Freisling, H.; Weiderpass, E.; et al. Separate and Combined Associations of Obesity and Metabolic Health with Coronary Heart Disease: A Pan-European Case-Cohort Analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kyeong, D.; Id, S.; Hong, Y.S.; Sung, Y.; Id, H.L. Waist Circumference and Mortality or Cardiovascular Events in a General Korean Population. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.C.; Huang, Y.; Lo, K.; Huang, Y.Q.; Chen, J.Y.; Feng, Y.Q. Quotient of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index: A Valuable Indicator for the High-Risk Phenotype of Obesity. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 697437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jayedi, A.; Soltani, S.; Zargar, M.S.; Khan, T.A.; Shab-Bidar, S. Central Fatness and Risk of All Cause Mortality: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of 72 Prospective Cohort Studies. BMJ 2020, 370, m3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, Y.; Liu, K.; Zheng, M.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; et al. Analysis of Changes in Weight, Waist Circumference, or Both, and All-Cause Mortality in Chinese Adults. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2225876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krakauer, N.Y.; Krakauer, J.C. A New Body Shape Index Predicts Mortality Hazard Independently of Body Mass Index. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pischon, T.; Boeing, H.; Hoffmann, K.; Bergmann, M.; Schulze, M.B.; Overvad, K.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Spencer, E.; Moons, K.G.M.; Tjønneland, A.; et al. General and Abdominal Adiposity and Risk of Death in Europe. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2105–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Staiano, A.E.; Reeder, B.A.; Elliott, S.; Joffres, M.R.; Pahwa, P.; Kirkland, S.A.; Paradis, G.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Body Mass Index versus Waist Circumference as Predictors of Mortality in Canadian Adults. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 1450–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, Y.H.; Kim, S.M.; Han, K.D.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, S.S.; Oh, S.W.; Park, H.S.; Rhee, E.J.; Lee, W.Y.; Yoo, S.J. Waist Circumference and All-Cause Mortality Independent of Body Mass Index in Korean Population from the National Health Insurance Health Checkup 2009–2015. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jacobs, E.J.; Newton, C.C.; Wang, Y.; Patel, A.V.; McCullough, M.L.; Campbell, P.T.; Thun, M.J.; Gapstur, S.M. Waist Circumference and All-Cause Mortality in a Large US Cohort. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010, 170, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chung, T.H.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, Y.J. Fatty Liver Index as a Simple and Useful Predictor for 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risks Determined by Framingham Risk Score in the General Korean Population. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2021, 30, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Koster, A.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Schatzkin, A.; Mouw, T.; Adams, K.F.; van Eijk, J.T.M.; Hollenbeck, A.R.; Harris, T.B. Waist Circumference and Mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2008, 167, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 16 00961 g001
Figure 1. Distribution (%) by body mass index and waist circumference deciles (based on gender deciles). A. Males; B. females. Abbreviations: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC).
Figure 1. Distribution (%) by body mass index and waist circumference deciles (based on gender deciles). A. Males; B. females. Abbreviations: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC).
Nutrients 16 00961 g001
Nutrients 16 00961 g002
Figure 2. Association of WC-d/BMI-d with all-cause mortality. Dependent variable: all-cause mortality; main exposure: WC-d/BMI-d (continuous scale), calculated separately for males and females. The model for the total population was adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidity, and BMI level. Stratified models were adjusted for all covariates except the covariate used for stratification.
Figure 2. Association of WC-d/BMI-d with all-cause mortality. Dependent variable: all-cause mortality; main exposure: WC-d/BMI-d (continuous scale), calculated separately for males and females. The model for the total population was adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidity, and BMI level. Stratified models were adjusted for all covariates except the covariate used for stratification.
Nutrients 16 00961 g002
Nutrients 16 00961 g003
Figure 3. Changes in the ratio of waist circumference-decile to BMI-decile with age by gender (A) and by BMI group (B).
Figure 3. Changes in the ratio of waist circumference-decile to BMI-decile with age by gender (A) and by BMI group (B).
Nutrients 16 00961 g003
Table 1. Main characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Main characteristics of the study population.
All PopulationMaleFemalep-Value
Individualsn30,29815,05415,244
Age, yearsMean (SD)46.3 (17.1)46.2 (17.3)46.5 (16.9)0.071
Median (IQR)46.0 (32.0–61.0)46.0 (31.0–61.0)46.0 (32.0–61.0)
Age groups, n (%)20–3911,548 (38.1%)5864 (39.0%)5684 (37.3%)0.001
40–5910,316 (34.0%)4980 (33.1%)5336 (35.0%)
60+8434 (27.8%)4210 (28.0%)4224 (27.7%)
Ethnicity, n (%)Mexican American4916 (16.2%)2437 (16.2%)2479 (16.3%)<0.001
Other Hispanic3342 (11.0%)1517 (10.1%)1825 (12.0%)
Non-Hispanic White11,547 (38.1%)5857 (38.9%)5690 (37.3%)
Non-Hispanic Black6678 (22.0%)3296 (21.9%)3382 (22.2%)
Other Race3815 (12.6%)1947 (12.9%)1868 (12.3%)
Body mass index (BMI)Mean (SD)29.3 (6.8)28.8 (6.0)29.8 (7.5)<0.001
Median (IQR)28.1 (24.4–32.8)27.8 (24.5–31.8)28.6 (24.2–33.9)
BMI groups, n (%)Normal (BMI < 25)8683 (28.7%)4209 (28.0%)4474 (29.4%)<0.001
Overweight (25, <30)9889 (32.6%)5587 (37.1%)4302 (28.2%)
Obese (≥30)11,726 (38.7%)5258 (34.9%)6468 (42.4%)
Waist circumference, cmMean (SD)99.3 (16.5)100.7 (16.1)97.8 (16.8)<0.001
Median (IQR)97.7 (87.2–109.0)99.2 (89.5–109.9)96.0 (85.2–108.0)
WC-d/BMI-dMean (SD)1.06 (0.39)1.07 (0.41)1.05 (0.37)0.016
Median (IQR)1.0 (0.88–1.14)1.0 (0.88–1.14)1.0 (0.89–1.14)
Smoking status, n (%)Non-smoker16,737 (55.2%)6951 (46.2%)9786 (64.2%)<0.001
Past smoker6568 (21.7%)4054 (26.9%)2514 (16.5%)
Smoker6211 (20.5%)3610 (24.0%)2601 (17.1%)
Missing782 (2.6%)439 (2.9%)343 (2.3%)
Glucose, mmol/LMean (SD)5.7 (2.2)5.8 (2.3)5.6 (2.1)<0.001
Median (IQR)5.2 (4.7–5.8)5.2 (4.8–5.8)5.0 (4.7–5.7)
Missing (%)1621 (5.4%)804 (5.3%)817 (5.4%)
Total cholesterol, mmol/LMean (SD)5.0 (1.1)4.9 (1.1)5.0 (1.1)<0.001
Median (IQR)4.9 (4.2–5.6)4.8 (4.1–5.6)4.9 (4.3–5.7)
Missing (%)1626 (5.4%)806 (5.4%)820 (5.4%)
LDL, mmol/LMean (SD)113.2 (35.4)113.1 (35.5)113.4 (35.3)0.55
Median (IQR)110.0 (89.0–134.0)111.0 (88.0–135.0)110.0 (89.0–134.0)
Missing (%)16,686 (55.1%)8365 (55.6%)8321 (54.6%)
HDL, mmol/LMean (SD)52.3 (15.8)47.8 (14.3)56.7 (16.0)<0.001
Median (IQR)50.0 (41.0–61.0)45.0 (38.0–55.0)55.0 (45.0–66.0)
Missing (%)1526 (5.0%)769 (5.1%)757 (5.0%)
Triglycerides, mmol/LMean (SD)1.7 (1.5)1.9 (1.7)1.5 (1.3)<0.001
Median (IQR)1.3 (0.9–2.1)1.5 (1.0–2.3)1.3 (0.8–1.9)
Missing (%)1639 (5.4%)810 (5.4%)829 (5.4%)
Systolic blood pressure,
mm Hg		Mean (SD)123.3 (17.8)125.2 (16.6)121.4 (18.8)<0.001
Median (IQR)120 (112–132)122.0 (114–134)118.0 (108–132)
Missing (%)2075 (6.8%)867 (5.8%)1208 (7.9%)
Diastolic blood pressure,Mean (SD)70.8 (12.6)72.2 (12.8)69.4 (12.2)<0.001
mm HgMedian (IQR)72.0 (64.0–78.0)72.0 (64.0–80.0)70.0 (62.0–76.0)
Missing (%)2075 (6.8%)867 (5.8%)1208 (7.9%)
Chronic diseases, n (%)Diabetics3660 (12.1%)1906 (12.7%)1754 (11.5%)0.008
Hypertension9987 (33.0%)4906 (32.6%)5081 (33.3%)0.277
CAD946 (3.1%)657 (4.4%)289 (1.9%)<0.001
CHF731 (2.4%)438 (2.9%)293 (1.9%)<0.001
Renal disease824 (2.72%)405 (2.69%)419 (2.74%)0.008
Asthma4529 (14.9%)1946 (12.9%)2583 (16.9%)<0.001
Co-morbidities, n (%)Non-morbid15,753 (52.0%)7989 (53.1%)7764 (50.9%)<0.001
Morbid8459 (27.9%)4037 (26.8%)4422 (29.0%)
Multi-morbid6086 (20.1%)3028 (20.1%)3058 (20.1%)
Deaths, n (%) 1856 (6.1%)1115 (7.4%)741 (4.9%)<0.001
Missing69 (0.2%)26 (0.2%)43 (0.3%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reges, O.; Test, T.; Dicker, D.; Karpati, T. Association of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Deciles Ratio with All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients 2024, 16, 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070961

AMA Style

Reges O, Test T, Dicker D, Karpati T. Association of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Deciles Ratio with All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients. 2024; 16(7):961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reges, Orna, Tsafnat Test, Dror Dicker, and Tomas Karpati. 2024. "Association of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Deciles Ratio with All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey" Nutrients 16, no. 7: 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070961

APA Style

Reges, O., Test, T., Dicker, D., & Karpati, T. (2024). Association of Waist Circumference and Body Mass Index Deciles Ratio with All-Cause Mortality: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients, 16(7), 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16070961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop