Next Article in Journal
Vitamin D Levels in Early and Middle Pregnancy and Preeclampsia, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypes and Endotypes of Peach Allergy: What Is New?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 5
10.3390/nu14051000
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Nutrients in Prevention, Treatment and Post-Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19)

by
Maria Letizia Motti
1,*,
Domenico Tafuri
1,
Lorenzo Donini
1,
Maria Teresa Masucci
2,
Valentina De Falco
3 and
Filomena Mazzeo
1
1
Department of Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University “Parthenope”, 80133 Naples, Italy
2
Neoplastic Progression Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Istituto di Endocrinologia e Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(5), 1000; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051000
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 23 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 February 2022 / Published: 26 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
SARS-CoV-2 virus, infecting human cells via its spike protein, causes Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 is characterized by shortness of breath, fever, and pneumonia and is sometimes fatal. Unfortunately, to date, there is still no definite therapy to treat COVID-19. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) approved only supportive care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to maintain a correct intake of nutrients to support very weakened patients in overcoming disease arose. The literature available on nutrient intake for COVID-19 is mainly focused on prevention. However, the safe intake of micro- and/or macro-nutrients can be useful either for preventing infection and supporting the immune response during COVID-19, as well as in the post-acute phase, i.e., “long COVID”, that is sometimes characterized by the onset of various long lasting and disabling symptoms. The aim of this review is to focus on the role of nutrient intake during all the different phases of the disease, including prevention, the acute phase, and finally long COVID.

1. Introduction

The etiological agent of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 19) was named SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) on 11 February 2020, by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1].
SARS-CoV-2 was detected for the first time in December of 2019 in in Wuhan (Hubei), China [2]. From there, SARS-CoV-2 spread throughout the world by rapid viral person-to-person infection [3].
The virus reached nearly all countries in the world in less than six months and on 30 January 2020, it was named “the first pandemic of the 21st century” by the World Health Organization (WHO) [4].
SARS-CoV-2 is an envelope RNA- virus with a positive sense RNA genome (30 kb long) encoding four structural proteins, spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N). It has in total 11 genes, with 11 open reading frames (ORFs) [5].
The SARS-CoV-2 enters and infects nasal ciliated and lung alveolar epithelial cells, small intestine enterocytes, arterial and venous endothelial cells, and arterial smooth muscle cells via the interaction of its S protein with angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor [6].
Spike is a homotrimeric glycoprotein constituted by two functional subunits: S1 subunit that binds to ACE2 receptor and S2 subunit implicated in the fusion of the viral and host cell membranes. After the binding of the S1 subunit to ACE2 on human cells, the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), in human cell membranes, cleaves the spike protein, activating the S2 domain. This process causes the virus to fuse with the cell and enter it [7,8].
The infection by SARS-CoV2 of epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract results in a local immune response caused by interferon beta (IFN-β) and CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL-1O), giving mild symptoms, such as cough, fever, and rhinorrhea [9]. However, when SARS-CoV-2 enters the pulmonary alveoli, severe pneumonia can develop: the virus can infect type II alveolar cells, destroying them and causing widespread damage to the alveoli [10]. In very aggressive cases of COVID-19, the virus can enter the bloodstream and infect endothelial and other target cells in the kidneys, esophagus, bladder, ileum, heart tissues, and central nervous system. In patients in critical condition, the release of a large number of interleukins and cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, CCL3, IP-10, and TNF α, causes the so-called “cytokine storm” (Figure 1) [11,12,13], which attracts neutrophils, CD4 helper, and CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes, which, acting against the infection, generate a constant inflammatory state. This inflammatory situation causes apoptosis and necrosis of the surrounding tissue and self-feeds, causing damage to type I and type II alveolar cells. This promotes an increase in blood vessel permeability, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Figure 1) [13,14,15].
In the last year, the development of vaccines has given great hope for countering the pandemic. Unfortunately, it has been shown that, in most cases, they do not fully protect against infection and spread of the virus. However, vaccine development has been the most important approach to preventing severe COVID-19 and plays a pivotal role in the control and reduction of mortality [16]. The virus uses its spike protein to enter the host cells by interacting with a specific receptor ACE2. Thus, all vaccines available so far target the spike protein. Vaccines induce the expression of the spike protein in the human cells, via mRNA or an adenoviral vector. The human immune system will recognize this protein as foreign and induce the production of neutralizing antibodies [16].
Recent studies proposed therapies for COVID-19 patients based on the pathogenesis of the infection and dependent on the course of the disease. In fact, they propose the use of oxygen therapy to counteract low oxygen saturation, anti-inflammatories to prevent the storm of cytokines and ARDS, antiviral agents to block as much as possible the entry of the virus into host cells, antithrombotic drugs to prevent cases of intravascular coagulation disseminated, and finally the use of monoclonal antibodies in the most serious patients [17,18]. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies target the viral spike protein, preventing the virus from binding to host cells, and represent one of the primary immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 [18].
However, SARS-CoV-2 exerts its adaptive capacities through mutations of its protein, which gives the virus a competitive advantage, affecting its pathogenic potential. In fact, only a single variation of amino acid is able to influence the viral replication, transmission, or immune control evasion, making the vaccine ineffective. SARS-CoV-2, like other RNA viruses that typically have higher mutation rates than DNA viruses, selects genetic mutations, allowing a greater transmissibility in human cells and developing different variants. So, variants of the virus continue to be selected, presenting a variable number of mutations in the spike protein. The latest variant identified, Omicron, contains more than thirty amino acid mutations in the spike protein, mostly present in the receptor binding domain, and exhibits an increased transmissibility and escape ability from vaccines and therapies [19,20].
The progressive selection of new mutations will compromise the efficacy of both vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.
Given the rapid transmission, the severity of infections, and the absence of drugs able to completely inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is urgent to discover and develop molecules capable of improving the host’s natural defenses and further antiviral agents. The innovation of this review is represented by the focus on the three different moments of the infection, in particular long COVID, which has become increasingly worrying. In fact, in the initial phase of the pandemic, not enough time had elapsed to highlight these long-lasting symptoms, following the acute infection, which were sometimes confused with other diseases. Moreover, last but not least, the use of micro and macronutrients is a relatively inexpensive and easily manageable treatment, without hospitalization. If proven effective, it has the potential to change the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Materials and Methods

An online survey on PubMed and Scopus from beginning of COVID-19 pandemic to January 2022 of all scientific publications (case reports, letters to editors, reviews, original research) focused on SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. Search keywords were: COVID-19, nutrients, dietary supplements, SARS-CoV-2, long COVID, ARDS, inflammation, immune system. The online survey was carried out by a systematic analysis and a critical evaluation of the collected studies, considering the most valuable studies in the best journals. Only articles reporting associations between nutrients and COVID-19 in humans were analysed. All articles not published in English, articles with a short commentary, short notes, or incomplete results were excluded. Search results were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria by all the authors. As the topic is very innovative, all the works found are very recent and some studies could remain incomplete.

3. Results

3.1. Nutrients in COVID-19 Prevention

During the COVID-19 pandemic, people trusted web and social media guidelines on the use of natural substances and supplements, miraculously acting in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
Some of these substances are already known as immune system enhancers. Many vitamins, including vitamins A, B6, B12, C, D, E, and folates as well as trace elements, including zinc, iron, selenium, magnesium, and copper, are very useful in supporting both innate and adaptive immune immunity. Deficiencies in these substances negatively affect the activation of the immune system in infections [21,22,23].
For example, vitamin C has a role in immune response, regulating several cellular functions of innate and adaptive immunity. Vitamin C influences neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the generation of reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, vitamin C promotes the differentiation and proliferation of B and T cells. It is known that vitamin C deficiency negatively regulates the immune response, making the body more sensitive to infections [21].
Vitamin D plays a role in the defense against viral infections as it is able to modulate both the adaptive and the innate immune systems [24,25,26]. It protects against respiratory pathogens by various mechanisms. Moreover, 25-hydroxyvitamin, the main circulating metabolite of vitamin D, responds to both viral and bacterial stimuli by inducing the expression of antimicrobial peptides [27,28,29]. In fact, various studies describe a correlation between low serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and an increased chance of contracting acute infections of the respiratory tract [30,31]. Moreover, the vitamin D metabolites induce autophagy and the synthesis of reactive intermediates of both nitrogen and oxygen, reducing acute respiratory infections and pneumonia [32,33,34].
Furthermore, vitamin B6 activates innate and adaptive immunity by influencing the proliferation of immune cells [35], Zn influences the development and activity of both neutrophils and NK cells [36], Fe regulates the differentiation and proliferation of T lymphocytes and, through the production of reactive oxygen species, plays a role in the removal of infectious agents [37]. Finally, selenium supports the activity of the immune system, as the deficiency of Se compromises both innate and acquired immunity [38]. Other nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids (N-3 PUFAs) also participate in the effectiveness of the immune response, playing a role in reducing inflammation: they inhibit leukocyte chemotaxis, production of inflammatory cytokines, and T lymphocyte reactivity. Moreover, they give rise to resolvins and protectins that participate in the resolution of inflammation [39].
Most of these micronutrients are included in the European Union Register on Nutrition and Health Claims, as they play a role in the functioning of the immune system [40].
Therefore, various authors recommend the early use of substances, such as zinc, selenium, and vitamin D [41], as well as other micronutrients, to increase resistance to COVID-19 [42]. This should be done especially in areas at highest risk of developing COVID-19 and as early as possible in the case of suspected infections [43].
The World Health Organization reiterated during the pandemic the indications for proper nutrition based on the guidelines already known, which recommend a Mediterranean diet, with a prevalent consumption of fresh and unprocessed foods, vegetables, and in which the use of sugars and saturated fats and an excessive amount of salt are not recommended [44]. In the literature, there are several studies that highlight the important role of nutrition in the correct functioning of the immune response (Figure 2). Sometimes a correct diet can be sufficient to guarantee the correct intake of the micro and macro nutrients suggested in the study. However, for some of them, such as vitamin D, diet alone cannot increase serum 25 (OH) D concentrations to provide optimal protection from SARS-CoV-2. In addition, further randomized trials with an early administration of high doses of vitamin D after the onset of COVID-19 should be conducted in order to identify the right time to start vitamin D administration to achieve a significant effectiveness [45].

3.2. Nutrients in COVID-19 Treatment

Since SARS-CoV-2 infection became a pandemic, affecting millions of people, an urgent need has arisen for effective treatments against this disease.
COVID-19 patients, especially hospitalized ones, show strong consequences, such as hypermetabolism and muscle catabolism, due to a marked systemic inflammation, with a reduction in food intake and therefore malnutrition. Some studies show that the outcome of COVID-19 patients is correlated with their nutritional status [46,47].
Some data have shown that the lack of some minerals and vitamins has a negative effect on the patient’s recovery during the treatment of COVID-19 [48]. In fact, some micronutrients influence the production of inflammatory mediators during the disease and act as immunostimulants, so they are recommended for COVID-19 patients [48,49].
For this reason, many studies have focused on the role of micronutrients in supporting the treatment of COVID [41,48,50] (Figure 2).

3.2.1. Vitamin C

During infections, vitamin C levels decrease because metabolism requires a great amount of this vitamin due to increasing inflammation. Vitamin C supplementation is used in the prevention and therapy of respiratory and systemic infections. For prevention, plasma levels of vitamin C of at least 100–200 mg/day are required. However, for the treatment of infection, higher doses of vitamin C are needed to balance the increased demand due to the inflammatory response [51].
Vitamin C in COVID-19 pathology inhibits inflammation and activates the immune response by acting on various mechanisms: it regulates the production of cytokines, the amount of released histamines, mitigates oxidative stress, and acts on the differentiation and proliferation of T and B lymphocytes [51,52].
However, the data on the effect of Vitamin C administration in the treatment of COVID-19 need further and larger prospective randomized studies [53].

3.2.2. Vitamin D

The importance of vitamin D in COVID 19 prophylaxis has been previously described, and its role in modulating both the adaptive and innate immune systems has been highlighted [25,26].
The idea that low vitamin D levels may be linked to the severity of the disease has stimulated many studies. In a study carried out in India, severe COVID-19 patients presented with vitamin D deficiency with lower serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and with higher levels of inflammatory markers compared to asymptomatic patients [54].
In addition, other observational studies show that low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin are associated with the severity of COVID-19 [55,56,57,58].
There are several data, albeit not definitive, that attribute a therapeutic function to vitamin D in COVID-19. In a first study, patients treated with a high-dose cholecalciferol supplementation showed greater SARS- CoV-2 negativization than those who do not have supplementation. [59]. Another one, highlights that the early use of calcifediol or cholecalciferol correlates with increased survival among COVID-19 hospitalized patients [60].
Other groups showed that a good vitamin D status reduces the use of intensive care and leads to a reduction in mortality [61,62]. In particular, some of these showed an association between the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cholecalciferol and reduced mortality, regardless of initial 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [63,64].
Another Spanish study has shown that early administration of high-dose calcifediol in combination with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin greatly reduces the disease severity and access to intensive care compared to treatment with hydroxychloroquine or azithromycin alone [65].
However, although a sure correlation between vitamin D and recovery from COVID-19 has not yet been demonstrated, new guidelines have been provided in many countries recommending vitamin D supplementation in case of SARS-CoV-2 positivity.

3.2.3. Zinc

Upper respiratory system virus infections are prevented by the presence of mucus and vibrating cilia [66]. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes damage to the ciliated epithelium and ciliary dyskinesia [67]. Zinc is essential in keeping tissue barriers intact and functioning. In fact, it is known that zinc promotes ciliary beating and, in rats with a Zn deficiency, its integration caused an improvement in both the number and length of the bronchial vibratory cilia [68,69]. Zinc is known to act on viral replication in several types of viruses, including Coronaviridiae [70]. It prevents fusion with the host cell membranes, inhibits viral polymerase activity, interferes with viral protein synthesis, inhibits the release of viral particles, and makes unstable the viral envelope [71]. COVID-19 is characterized by an imbalance of the immune response [72]. The most severe forms are characterized by systemic inflammation, due to cytokine storm, and organ failure. Moreover, some patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [73]. Zinc plays an important role in the immune response by normalizing excessive immune reactions, balancing the interactions among the various cell types of the immune system. Hence, zinc at high concentrations of inflammatory mediators prevents the destruction of host tissue [11].
However, further studies are needed to show that zinc can be used as a therapy for COVID-19. Despite several studies that have focused on using zinc supplementation alone or in combination with other drugs including hydroxychloroquine, results are not yet known and the effectiveness of zinc is still uncertain [74].

3.2.4. N-3 PUFAs

It has been shown that N-3 PUFAs, commonly called omega-3 fatty acids, have excellent effects in fighting viral infections [74] and that their deficiency can cause a delayed resolution of inflammations [75,76].
Indeed, N-3 PUFAs play a valuable role in the therapy of inflammation associated diseases. Physiologically, the inflammation resolves quickly in the final phase of the immune response when negative feedback mechanisms are activated. Among these processes is the enzymatic conversion of omega-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) into specialized pro-resolution mediators (SPM) known as resolvins, protectins, and maresins, at the site of inflammation. SPMs participate, together with other molecules, in the resolution of inflammation, also in the respiratory tract [77,78]. Therefore, a plausible hypothesis could be that SPMs can help solve the cytokine storm and COVID-19 associated lung inflammation [79,80]. Before the COVID pandemic, N-3 PUFAs had been attributed a role in countering ARDS and sepsis [81,82,83] and since ARDS and sepsis characterize severe COVID patients [83], it is possible that N-3 PUFAs could represent a valid treatment in severe patients. This could be very important in the context of severe COVID-19 manifesting an uncontrolled inflammation, the so-called cytokine storm and ARDS [84].
Another mechanism by which N-3 PUFAs reduce inflammation levels is inhibiting leukocyte chemotaxis, the expression of adhesion molecules, and interaction between leucocytes and endothelium [39,85,86]. Moreover, N-3 PUFAs affect the adaptive immune response [85] by regulating antigen presentation and CD4+ Th1 cell production [87].
However, preliminary data on the correlation between omega-3 fatty acid intake and recovery from COVID-19 are still controversial. In a pilot study, blood omega-3 concentration from 100 COVID-19 patients was inversely related to the risk of death [88]. Therefore, although there are strong indications that N-3 PUFAs may play a role in regulating the immune system in COVID-19, existing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not always significant, so further studies are needed.
Finally, another positive effect of N-3 PUFAs in COVID-19 patients could be ascribed to their antithrombotic properties [89,90,91]. As some COVID-19 patients, particularly those with comorbidities, may develop complications, such as arterial and venous thrombosis [92], N-3 fatty acids may play an important role in the therapy of thrombotic complications from COVID-19.

3.2.5. Lactoferrin

Lactoferrin, a milk-derived 80-kDa glycoprotein [93,94], synthesized by neutrophils, is involved in innate immunity and plays a role in host defense [95,96,97]. It is able to bind free iron [98] and is capable of modulating the tissue inflammatory process by inducing a decrease in the production of proinflammatory cytokines and by regulating the expression of some proteins involved in inflammatory and iron homeostasis (including ferroportin, membrane-bound ceruloplasmin, cytosolic ferritin, transferrin receptor 1) [99].
In COVID-19 patients, the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL) -6 could both induce coagulopathy and affect iron homeostasis [100,101,102,103]. So Lactoferrin (Lf) could counteract SARS-CoV-2 infection, inflammation, and dysregulation of iron homeostasis simultaneously and could be important in the treatment of COVID-19 [102,103,104,105].
In fact, several studies have been conducted to evaluate the antiviral effect of Lactoferrin. It has been shown that asymptomatic, pauci-symptomatic, and moderate COVID-19 lactoferrin-treated patients show faster virus negativization and more rapid clinical recovery than untreated patients. Furthermore, Lactoferrin treatment is safe and well tolerated in all treated patients [106,107].

3.2.6. Hesperidin

Hesperidin is a flavonic glycoside with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory [108] properties. It is commonly found in lemon and sweet oranges and acts against the influenza virusb, by inhibiting viral replication [109,110]. Combined with Quercetin, it has been recently proposed as a treatment to block the replication of SARS-CoV-2 by interfering with its interaction with the angiotensin 2 receptor converting enzyme [111,112,113,114,115]. Furthermore, it has been shown that Quercetin and vitamin C act synergistically against SARS-CoV-2 [116]. In a very recent paper, an early therapy with Hesperidin and quercetin, administered together with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with antiviral properties (indomethacin) and with an anti-aggregating drug (low-dose aspirin), was proposed to be carried out within 3 days from the beginning of the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2. This therapy showed a reduction in the severity of COVID-19 and rate of hospitalization [117].
In conclusion, regardless of the therapeutic activity of each micro or macronutrient, the nutritional status of COVID-19 patients should be carefully evaluated using standardized methods. In fact, all COVID-19 patients, especially those hospitalized or admitted to intensive care, should be considered at risk of malnutrition. Through a careful analysis of the real deficiencies and severity of COVID-19 disease, a correct integration should be administered without incurring the risk of refeeding syndrome [118].
The importance of performing a close community nutritional surveillance is highlighted by the nutritional support recommendations for COVID-19 patients provided by a professional clinical nutrition [119].

3.3. Nutrients Post COVID-19

At the end of acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 disease, so-called “long COVID” can develop, characterized by a series of persistent symptoms that last more than 12 weeks from the beginning of the infection [120].
Cognitive dysfunction and fatigue are main symptoms accompanied by sleep disturbances, lack of concentration, depression, and pain. Changes in taste and smell, headache, dizziness, coordination difficulties, memory loss, anxiety, and insomnia are also found. [121,122].
A clear explanation for these neurological symptoms has not yet been proposed. One possibility is that the virus can cross or damage the blood–brain barrier (BBB). In addition, the virus could enter the nose, and, via the olfactory nerve, arrive at the brain [123].
Fatigue appears to be independent of the severity of symptoms that characterize the acute phase of the disease [124]. In fact, long COVID also affects many healthy young people who have not been hospitalized [125,126,127].
It has been shown that the nutritional status of patients is important in determining the outcome of many diseases. This is the also case of COVID-19 [126,127].
COVID-19 patients, particularly those hospitalized and admitted to intensive care, who have developed metabolic disorders, have a poor nutritional status [128] due to malnutrition and weight loss. Simultaneously they suffer dyspnoea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dysphagia, diarrhea, and frailty as well as, sometimes, other comorbidities and prolonged hospitalization in intensive care [129,130,131].
To date, no guidelines for post-COVID patients have been yet provided. However, as it is known that dietary imbalances can adversely affect cognitive functions, causing worsening in reasoning, attention, and memory skills and promoting dementia and depression, it would be necessary to define them as soon as possible [132,133,134,135].
Nutrients, including vitamins B1, B6, B9, B12, C, D, and E, ω-3 fatty acids, and minerals, such as iron, zinc, and selenium, are known to play an important role in protecting against neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Therefore, they have a very positive effect on cognitive functions [136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147].
Frequently, long COVID patients report the typical sensation of “brain fog”. The pathogenesis of brain fog is not yet fully understood. It could be induced by neuroinflammation caused by infectious agents, including SARS-CoV-2, stimulating mast cells to release microglia-activating mediators that in turn inflame the hypothalamus [148,149,150,151]. Therefore, inhibition of mast cells could be useful in treatment of brain fog. Natural flavonoids, including luteolin and quercetin, could be used as mast cell inhibitors: they inhibit neuroinflammation and decrease cognitive decline. In particular, luteolin is able to better penetrate the brain and inhibits both microglia and mast cells [152,153,154,155] (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

As mentioned above, the development of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 had a negative impact on the efficacy of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies therapy.
Thus, due to the extensive spreading of SARS-CoV-2 and the severity of the disease in some patients, it is essential to identify molecules capable of fighting against SARS-CoV-2 infection and treating COVID-19 disease. In particular, it is also worth noting that patients with mild symptoms may develop severe consequences, due to the onset of a series of long-lasting symptoms, constituting the so called long COVID.
In this review we have discussed a number of studies showing that nutrition may play an important role in influencing both the susceptibility and the clinical course of COVID-19 and long COVID, as is already known for other viral diseases.
We have shown that nutritional status plays a pivotal role in the function of the immune system, supporting both innate and adaptive immunity, influencing the proliferation and activity of immune cells. Furthermore, we highlighted that nutrients play a role in reducing inflammation. They inhibit leukocyte chemotaxis, inflammatory cytokine production, and T lymphocyte reactivity [24,25,26,35,37,38]. Moreover, they give rise to resolvins and protectins, which participate in the resolution of inflammation by normalizing excessive immune reactions [39]. In addition, they are essential for keeping intact and functioning tissue barriers. Finally, some of them seem to influence viral replication and they have even been shown to have a neuroprotective effect in long COVID, by decreasing cognitive decline.
Considering that the literature is often contradictory and that the reference to isolated studies could lead to false conclusions on COVID-19 prevention and treatment, at the moment, we can only suggest the introduction of micro and/or macronutrients into a balanced diet.
Indeed, up to now, no solid evidence supports the adoption of specific nutritional therapies, so it is necessary to await the results of the ongoing clinical trials.
Of course, since all forms of malnutrition negatively affect the functioning of the immune system, malnutrition will also impact the susceptibility to COVID-19. Of note, it has been shown that patients with obesity, heart disease, hypertension, or diabetes, if affected by COVID-19, have more severe infections with higher rates of hospitalization and mortality [156,157]
On the other hand, it should be considered that micronutrient amount is not routinely measured upon admission to hospital. Thus, public health strategies aimed at preventing micronutrient deficiencies, malnutrition, and over-nutrition remain of basic importance.
It should also be considered that, up to now, data on the recommended daily allowance (RDA) and adequate intake (AI) of dietary supplements to prevent or treat COVID-19 are not sufficient. They are usually customized for women, men, age groups, and for specific conditions. For instance, the effects of dietary supplement may be dependent on gender. Louca et al. observed a significant correlation between diet supplement intake and SARS-CoV-2 positivity in women, but no clear benefit was shown in men [158,159]. Moreover, many nutrients in very high doses can be dangerous.
Unfortunately, there are not conclusive data in this field, but many studies are ongoing. Mainly, studies on the use of micro and macronutrients in COVID-19 patients should be improved. If effective, nutrients could have the potential to change the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Last but not least, the use of micro and macronutrients is a relatively inexpensive and easy to manage treatment, needing no hospitalization.
In conclusion, large randomized controlled studies are needed to establish the real role of micro- and/or macronutrients in the different phases of COVID-19 and to test their positive and/or adverse effects, before the approval of their therapeutic use in this pathology.

Author Contributions

M.L.M.: conception of the work. M.L.M., D.T., and F.M.: manuscript drafting. M.L.M. and F.M.: critical revision of the work and final version approval. M.T.M., V.D.F., and L.D.: revision of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Department of Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University “Parthenope”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Exclude this statement.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

COVID-19Coronavirus Disease-2019
SARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2
WHOWorld Health Organization
ACE2angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor
S proteinSpike protein
TMPRSS2transmembrane protease serine 2
IFN-βinterferon beta
CXCL-1OCXC motif chemokine ligand 10
ARDSacute respiratory distress syndrome
Seselenium
Feiron
Znzinc
N-3 PUFAsomega-3 fatty acids
EPAenzymatic conversion of omega-3 eicosapentaenoic acid
DHAdocosahexaenoic acid
SPMpro-resolution mediators
LfLactoferrin

References

  1. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dong, E.; Du, H.; Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 533–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, J.T.; Leung, K.; Leung, G.M. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: A modelling study. Lancet 2020, 395, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. World Health Organization Coronavirus 19. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. (accessed on 25 October 2020).
  5. Yoshimoto, F.K. The proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2 or n-COV19), the cause of COVID-19. Protein. J. 2020, 39, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamming, I.; Timens, W.; Bulthuis, M.L.C.; Lely, A.T.; Navis, G.J.; van Goor, H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Matsuyama, S.; Nagata, N.; Shirato, K.; Kawase, M.; Takeda, M.; Taguchi, F. Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 12658–12664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Belouzard, S.; Chu, V.C.; Whittaker, G.R. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5871–5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Parasher, A. COVID-19: Current understanding of its pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment. Postgrad. Med. J. 2020, 97, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mason, R.J. Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from a cell biology perspective. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55, 2000607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, U.K. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, W.; Cao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, H.; et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2620–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Channappanavar, R.; Fehr, A.R.; Vijay, R.; Mack, M.; Zhao, J.; Meyerholz, D.; Perlman, S. Dysregulated type I interferon and inflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ackermann, M.; Verleden, S.E.; Kuehnel, M.; Haverich, A.; Welt, T.; Laenger, F.; Vanstapel, A.; Werlein, C.; Stark, H.; Tzankov, A.; et al. Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Parisi, G.F.; Brindisi, G.; Indolfi, C.; Diaferio, L.; Marchese, G.; Ghiglioni, D.G.; Zicari, A.M.; Miraglia Del Giudice, M. Upper airway involvement in pediatric COVID-19. Pediatric Allergy Immunol. 2020, 31 (Suppl. S26), 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Whitaker, H.J.; Tsang, R.S.; Byford, R.; Andrews, N.J.; Sherlock, J.; Pillai, P.S.; Williams, J.; Button, E.; Campbell, H.; Sinnathamby, M.; et al. Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and immune response among individuals in clinical risk groups. J. Infect. 2022, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stratton, C.W.; Tang, Y.W.; Lu, H. Pathogenesis-directed therapy of 2019 novel coronavirus disease. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 1320–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.Z.; Gandhi, R.T. Realizing the Potential of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies for COVID-19 Management. JAMA 2022, 327, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cascella, M.; Rajnik, M.; Aleem, A.; Dulebohn, S.C.; Di Napoli, R. Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (COVID-19). In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kannan, S.; Shaik Syed Ali, P.; Sheeza, A. Omicron (B.1.1.529)—Variant of concern—Molecular profile and epidemiology: A mini review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 24, 8019–8022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Carr, A.C.; Maggini, S. Vitamin C and immune function. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Hooper, R.L.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017, 356, i6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gombart, A.F.; Pierre, A.; Maggini, S. A review of micronutrients and the immune system–working in harmony to reduce the risk of infection. Nutrients 2020, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Gois, P.; Ferreira, D.; Olenski, S.; Seguro, A. Vitamin D and infectious diseases: Simple bystander or contributing factor? Nutrients 2017, 9, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gruber-Bzura, B.M. Vitamin D and influenza—Prevention or therapy? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Charoenngam, N.; Holick, M.F. Immunologic effects of vitamin D on human health and disease. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hansdottir, S.; Monick, M.M.; Hinde, S.L.; Lovan, N.; Look, D.C.; Hunninghake, G.W. Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: Potential effects on host defense. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 7090–7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Olliver, M.; Spelmink, L.; Hiew, J.; Meyer-Hoffert, U.; Henriques-Normark, B.; Bergman, P. Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D on innate and adaptive immune responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Greiller, C.L.; Martineau, A.R. Modulation of the immune response to respiratory viruses by vitamin D. Nutrients 2015, 7, 4240–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cannell, J.J.; Vieth, R.; Umhau, J.C.; Holick, M.F.; Grant, W.B.; Madronich, S.; Garland, C.F.; Giovannucci, E. Epidemic influenza and vitamin D. Epidemiol. Infect. 2006, 134, 1129–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jolliffe, D.A.; Griffiths, C.J.; Martineau, A.R. Vitamin D in the prevention of acute respiratory infection: Systematic review of clinical studies. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 136, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hewison, M. Antibacterial effects of vitamin D. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zemb, P.; Bergman, P.; Camargo, C.A.; Cavalier, E.; Cormier, C.; Courbebaisse, M.; Hollis, B.; Joulia, F.; Minisola, S.; Pilz, S.; et al. Vitamin D Deficiency and the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 133–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ali, N. Role of Vitamin D in Preventing of COVID-19 Infection, Progression and Severity. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ueland, P.M.; McCann, A.; Midttun, O.; Ulvik, A. Inflammation, vitamin B6 and related pathways. Mol. Aspects Med. 2017, 53, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shankar, A.H.; Prasad, A.S. Zinc and immune function: The biological basis of altered resistance to infection. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 447S–463S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ebrahimzadeh-Attari, V.; Panahi, G.; Hebert, J.R.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Saghafi-Asl, M.; Lotfi-Yaghin, N.; Baradaran, B. Nutritional approach for increasing public health during pandemic of COVID-19: A comprehensive review of antiviral nutrients and nutraceuticals. Health Promot. Perspect. 2021, 11, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sheridan, P.A.; Zhong, N.; Carlson, B.A.; Perella, C.M.; Hatfield, D.L.; Beck, M.A. Decreased selenoprotein expression alters the immune response during influenza virus infection in mice. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Calder, P.C. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Nutrition or pharmacology? Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 75, 645–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/claims/register/public/?event=search (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  41. Alexander, J.; Tinkov, A.; Strand, T.A.; Alehagen, U.; Skalny, A.; Aaseth, J. Early Nutritional Interventions with Zinc, Selenium and Vitamin D for Raising Anti-Viral Resistance Against Progressive COVID-19. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lai, Y.J.; Chang, H.S.; Yang, Y.P.; Lin, T.W.; Lai, W.Y.; Lin, Y.Y.; Chang, C.C. The role of micronutrient and immunomodulation effect in the vaccine era of COVID-19. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2021, 84, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mohan, M.; Cherian, J.J.; Sharma, A. Exploring links between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. WHO EMRO. Nutrition Advice for Adults during the COVID-19 Outbreak. Available online: http://www.emro.who.int/nutrition/nutrition-infocus/nutrition-advice-for-adults-during-the-COVID-19-outbreak.html. (accessed on 30 September 2020).
  45. Dissanayake, H.A.; de Silva, N.L.; Sumanatilleke, M.; de Silva, S.D.N.; Gamage, K.K.K.; Dematapitiya, C.; Kuruppu, D.C.; Ranasinghe, P.; Pathmanathan, S.; Katulanda, P. Prognostic and therapeutic role of vitamin D in COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cereda, E.; Clavé, P.; Collins, P.F.; Holdoway, A.; Wischmeyer, P.E. Recovery Focused Nutritional Therapy across the Continuum of Care: Learning from COVID-19. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hawryłkowicz, V.; Lietz-Kijak, D.; Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, K.; Sołek-Pastuszka, J.; Stachowska, L.; Folwarski, M.; Parczewski, M.; Stachowska, E. Patient Nutrition and Probiotic Therapy in COVID-19: What Do We Know in 2021? Nutrients 2021, 13, 3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khatiwada, S.; Subedi, A. A Mechanistic Link Between Selenium and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2021, 10, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yaseen, M.O.; Jamshaid, H.; Saif, A.; Hussain, T. Immunomodulatory role and potential utility of various nutrients and dietary components in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2021, 2, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daei Sorkhabi, A.; Sarkesh, A.; Daei Sorkhabi, A.; Entezari-Maleki, T.; Rashedi, J.; Bannazadeh Baghi, H. Vitamin supplementation as a potential adjunctive therapeutic approach for COVID-19: Biological and clinical plausibility. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021, 33, 55–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chen, Y.; Luo, G.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, N. Vitamin C mitigates oxidative stress and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in severe community-acquired pneumonia and LPS-induced macrophages. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 426740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hagel, A.F.; Layritz, C.M.; Hagel, W.H.; Hagel, H.J.; Hagel, E.; Dauth, W.; Kressel, J.; Regnet, T.; Rosenberg, A.; Neurath, M.F.; et al. Intravenous infusion of ascorbic acid decreases serum histamine concentrations in patients with allergic and non-allergic diseases. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2013, 386, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rawat, D.; Roy, A.; Maitra, S.; Gulati, A.; Khanna, P.; Baidya, D.K. Vitamin C and COVID-19 treat-ment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021, 15, 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jain, A.; Chaurasia, R.; Sengar, N.; Singh, M.; Mahor, S.; Narain, S. Analysis of vitamin D level among asymptomatic and critically ill COVID-19 patients and its correlation with inflammatory markers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. D’Avolio, A.; Avataneo, V.; Manca, A.; Cusato, J.; De Nicolò, A.; Lucchini, R.; Keller, F.; Cantù, M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are lower in patients with positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Meltzer, D.O.; Best, T.J.; Zhang, H.; Vokes, T.; Arora, V.; Solway, J. Association of vitamin D status and other clinical characteristics with COVID-19 test results. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2019722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hernández, J.L.; Nan, D.; Fernandez-Ayala, M.; García-Unzueta, M.; Hernández- Hernández, M.A.; López-Hoyos, M.; Muñoz-Cacho, P.; Olmos, J.M.; Gutiérrez- Cuadra, M.; Ruiz-Cubillán, J.; et al. Vitamin D status in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 106, e1343–e1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vassiliou, A.G.; Jahaj, E.; Pratikaki, M.; Orfanos, S.E.; Dimopoulou, I.; Kotanidou, A. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels on admission to the intensive care unit may predispose COVID-19 pneumonia patients to a higher 28- day mortality risk: A pilot study on a Greek ICU cohort. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rastogi, A.; Bhansali, A.; Khare, N.; Suri, V.; Yaddanapudi, N.; Sachdeva, N.; Puri, G.D.; Malhotra, P. Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: A randomised, placebo-controlled study (SHADE study). Postgrad. Med. J. 2020, 98, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Loucera, C.; Peña-Chilet, M.; Esteban-Medina, M.; Muñoyerro-Muñiz, D.; Villegas, R.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; Rodriguez-Baño, J.; Túnez, I.; Bouillon, R.; Dopazo, J.; et al. Real world evidence of calcifediol or vitamin D prescription and mortality rate of COVID-19 in a retrospective cohort of hospitalized Andalusian patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bouillon, R.; Quesada-Gomez, J.M. Vitamin D Endocrine System and COVID-19. JBMR Plus 2021, 5, e10576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nogues, X.; Ovejero, D.; Pineda-Moncusí, M.; Bouillon, R.; Arenas, D.; Pascual, J.; Ribes, A.; Guerri-Fernandez, R.; Villar-Garcia, J.; Rial, A.; et al. Calcifediol Treatment and COVID-19-Related Outcomes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e4017–e4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ling, S.F.; Broad, E.; Murphy, R.; Pappachan, J.M.; Pardesi-Newton, S.; Kong, M.F.; Jude, E.B. High-dose cholecalciferol booster therapy is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional multi-centre observational study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Limia-Perez, L.; Gomez-Huelgas, R.; Martin-Escalante, M.D.; Cortes-Rodriguez, B.; Zambrana-Garcia, J.L.; Entrenas-Castillo, M.; Perez-Caballero, A.I.; López-Carmona, M.D.; Garcia-Alegria, J.; et al. Calcifediol Treatment and Hospital Mortality Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Entrenas Castillo, M.; Entrenas Costa, L.M.; Barrios, J.M.V.; Alcalá Díaz, J.F.; Miranda, J.L.; Bouillon, R.; Gomez, J.M.Q. Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 203, 105751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. Vitamin D. NIH, Bethesda, MD. NIH. Available online: https://www.COVID19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/adjunctive-therapy/vitamin-d/ (accessed on 17 July 2020).
  67. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chilvers, M.A.; McKean, M.; Rutman, A.; Myint, B.S.; Silverman, M.; O’Callaghan, C. The effects of coronavirus on human nasal ciliated respiratory epithelium. Eur. Respir. J. 2001, 18, 965–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Woodworth, B.A.; Zhang, S.; Tamashiro, E.; Bhargave, G.; Palmer, J.N.; Cohen, N.A. Zinc increases ciliary beat frequency in a calcium-dependent manner. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2010, 24, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Darma, A.; Athiyyah, A.F.; Ranuh, R.G.; Merbawani, W.; Setyoningrum, R.A.; Hidajat, B.; Siti Nurul Hidayati, S.N.; Endaryanto, A.; Sudarmo, S.M. Zinc supplementation effect on the bronchial cilia length, the number of cilia, and the number of intact bronchial cell in zinc deficiency rats. Indones. Biomed. J. 2020, 12, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ishida, T. Review on the role of Zn2+ ions in viral pathogenesis and the effect of Zn2+ Ions for host cell-virus growth inhibition. AJBSR 2019, 2, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wessels, I.; Rolles, B.; Rink, L. The Potential Impact of Zinc Supplementation on COVID-19 Pathogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wen, W.; Su, W.; Tang, H.; Le, W.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Xie, L.; Li, J.; Ye, J.; et al. Immune cell profiling of COVID-19 patients in the recovery stage by single-cell sequencing. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Military Hospital of Tunis. A Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc in the Prevention of COVID-19 Infection in Military Healthcare Workers (COVID-Milit). ClinicalTrials.gov. 2020. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04377646 (accessed on 17 July 2020).
  75. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y. Potential interventions for novel coronavirus in China: A systematic review. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Basil, M.C.; Levy, B.D. Specialized pro-resolution mediators: Endogenous regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. D’Angelo, S.; Motti, M.L.; Meccariello, R. ω-3 and ω-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Obesity and Cancer. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Moss, J.W.E.; Ramji, D.P. Nutraceutical therapies for atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016, 13, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Office of the Commissioner FDA. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/guidance-regulation-food-and-dietary-supplements/food-safety-modernization-act-fsma (accessed on 2 December 2021).
  80. Panigrahy, D.; Gilligan, M.M.; Huang, S.; Gartung, A.; Cortés-Puch, I.; Sime, P.J.; Phipps, R.P.; Serhan, C.N.; Hammock, B.D. Inflammation resolution: A dual-pronged approach to averting cytokine storms in COVID-19? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020, 39, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Regidor, P.A.; Santos, F.G.; Rizo, J.M.; Egea, F.M. Pro resolving inflammatory effects of the lipid mediators of omega 3 fatty acids and its implication in SARS COVID-19. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 145, 110340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tian, T.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, Q.; Li, J. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids improve inflammation via inhibiting sphingosine kinase 1 in a rat model of parenteral nutrition and CLP-induced sepsis. Lipids 2016, 51, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Das, U.N. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and sepsis. Nutrition 2019, 65, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, B.; Zhou, X.; Qiu, Y.; Song, Y.; Feng, F.; Feng, J.; Song, Q.; Jia, Q.; Wang, J. Clinical characteristics of 82 cases of death from COVID-19. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0235458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Coperchinia, F.; Chiovato, L.; Croce, L.; Magri, F.; Rotondi, M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020, 53, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Calder, P.C. Marine omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Effects, mechanisms and clinical relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1851, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Radzikowska, U.; Rinaldi, A.O.; Çelebi Sözener, Z.; Karaguzel, D.; Wojcik, M.; Cypryk, K.; Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A.; Sokolowska, M. The Influence of Dietary Fatty Acids on Immune Responses. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Whelan, J.; Gowdy, K.M.; Shaikh, S.R. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate B cell activity in pre-clinical models: Implications for the immune response to infections. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 785, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Asher, A.; Tintle, N.L.; Myers, M.; Lockshon, L.; Bacareza, H.; Harris, W.S. Omega-3 fatty acids and death from COVID-19: A pilot study. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2021, 166, 102250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Lordan, R.; Redfern, S.; Tsoupras, A.; Zabetakis, I. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: Are marine phospholipids the answer? Food Funct. 2020, 11, 2861–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Adili, R.; Hawley, M.; Holinstat, M. Regulation of platelet function and thrombosis by omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2018, 139, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lordan, R.; Tsoupras, A.; Zabetakis, I. Platelet activation and prothrombotic mediators at the nexus of inflammation and atherosclerosis: Potential role of antiplatelet agents. Blood Rev. 2021, 45, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. William, J.; Gorog, D.A. Incidence of thrombotic complications in COVID-19. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  94. Montreuil, J.; Tonnelat, J.; Mullet, S. Preparation and properties of lactotransferrin of human milk. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1960, 45, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Groves, M.L. The isolation of a red protein from milk. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 3345–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Telang, S. Lactoferrin: A critical player in neonatal host defense. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Ward, P.P.; Uribe-Luna, S.; Conneely, O.M. Lactoferrin and host defense. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 80, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lepanto, M.S.; Rosa, L.; Paesano, R.; Valenti, P.; Cutone, A. Lactoferrin in aseptic and septic inflammation. Molecules 2019, 24, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Cutone, A.; Lepanto, M.S.; Rosa, L.; Scotti, M.G.; Rossi, A.; Ranucci, S.; De Fino, I.; Bragonzi, A.; Valenti, P.; Musci, G.; et al. Aerosolized bovine lactoferrin counteracts infection, inflammation and iron dysbalance in a cystic fibrosis mouse model of pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic lung infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Cutone, A.; Rosa, L.; Lepanto, M.S.; Scotti, M.J.; Berlutti, F.; Bonaccorsi di Patti, M.C.; Musci, G.; Valenti, P. Lactoferrin Efficiently Counteracts the Inflammation-Induced Changes of the Iron Homeostasis System in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Han, H.; Ma, Q.; Li, C.; Liu, R.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P.; Liu, X.; Gao, G.; Liu, F.; et al. Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, F.; Li, L.; Xu, M.; Wu, J.; Luo, D.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Song, X.; Zhou, X. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Miesbach, W.; Makris, M. COVID-19: Coagulopathy, risk of thrombosis, and the rationale for anticoagulation. Clin. Appl. Thromb. 2020, 26, 1076029620938149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zuo, Y.; Warnock, M.; Harbaugh, A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Gockman, K.; Zuo, M.; Madison, J.A.; Knight, J.S.; Kanthi, Y.; Lawrence, D.A. Plasma tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Campione, E.; Cosio, T.; Rosa, L.; Lanna, C.; Di Girolamo, S.; Gaziano, R.; Valenti, P.; Bianchi, L. Lactoferrin as protective natural barrier of respiratory and intestinal mucosa against coronavirus infection and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Campione, E.; Lanna, C.; Cosio, T.; Rosa, L.; Conte, M.P.; Iacovelli, F.; Romeo, A.; Falconi, M.; Del Vecchio, C.; Franchin, E.; et al. Lactoferrin against SARS-CoV-2: In vitro and in silico evidences. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 666600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rosa, L.; Tripepi, G.; Naldi, E.; Aimati, M.; Santangeli, S.; Venditto, F.; Caldarelli, M.; Valenti, P. Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients Treated with Lactoferrin as a Supplementary Antiviral Agent: A Preliminary Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Campione, E.; Lanna, C.; Cosio, T.; Rosa, L.; Conte, M.P.; Iacovelli, F.; Romeo, A.; Falconi, M.; Del Vecchio, C.; Franchin, E.; et al. Lactoferrin as Antiviral Treatment in COVID-19 Management: Preliminary Evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Parhiz, H.; Roohbakhsh, A.; Soltani, F.; Rezaee, R.; Iranshahi, M. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the citrus flavonoids hesperidin and hesperetin: An updated review of their molecular mechanisms and experimental models. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Saha, R.K.; Takahashi, T.; Suzuki, T. Glucosyl hesperidin prevents influenza a virus replication in vitro by inhibition of viral sialidase. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Ding, Z.; Sun, G.; Zhu, Z. Hesperidin attenuates influenza A virus (H1N1) induced lung injury in rats through its anti-inflammatory effect. Antivir. Ther. 2018, 23, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Haggag, Y.A.; El-Ashmawy, N.E.; Okasha, K.M. Is hesperidin essential for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 Infection? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 109957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, X.; et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 766–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bellavite, P.; Donzelli, A. Hesperidin and SARS-CoV-2: New light on the healthy function of citrus fruits. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Balmeh, N.; Mahmoudi, S.; Mohammadi, N.; Karabedianhajiabadi, A. Predicted therapeutic targets for COVID-19 disease by inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 and its related receptors. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2020, 20, 100407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Derosa, G.; Maffioli, P.; D’Angelo, A.; Di Pierro, F. A role for quercetin in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 1230–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Colunga Biancatelli, R.M.L.; Berrill, M.; Catravas, J.D.; Marik, P.E. Quercetin and vitamin C: An experimental synergistic therapy for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 related disease (COVID-19). Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Fazio, S.; Bellavite, P.; Zanolin, E.; McCullough, P.A.; Pandolfi, S.; Affuso, F. Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis of Early COVID-19 and Treated at Home Within 3 Days or After 3 Days of Symptom Onset with Prescribed and Non-Prescribed Treatments Between November 2020 and August 2021. Med. Sci. Monit. 2021, 27, e935379. [Google Scholar]
  119. Cawood, A.L.; Walters, E.R.; Smith, T.R.; Sipaul, R.H.; Stratton, R.J. A Review of Nutrition Support Guidelines for Individuals with or Recovering from COVID-19 in the Community. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Griffiths, J.; Hatch, R.A.; Bishop, J.; Morgan, K.; Jenkinson, C.; Cuthbertson, B.H.; Brett, S.J. An exploration of social and economic outcome and associated health-related quality of life after critical illness in general intensive care unit survivors: A 12-month follow-up study. Crit. Care 2013, 17, R100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Huang, C.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Gu, X.; Kang, L.; Guo, L.; Liu, M.; Zhou, X.; et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: A cohort study. Lancet 2021, 397, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Theoharides, T.C. Could SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Be Responsible for Long-COVID Syndrome? Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Townsend, L.; Dyer, A.H.; Jones, K.; Dunne, J.; Mooney, A.; Gaffney, F.; O’Connor, L.; Leavy, D.; O’Brien, K.; Dowds, J.; et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Goërtz, Y.M.J.; Van Herck, M.; Delbressine, J.M.; Vaes, A.W.; Meys, R.; Machado, F.V.C.; Houben-Wilke, S.; Burtin, C.; Posthuma, R.; Franssen, F.M.E.; et al. Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: The post-COVID-19 syndrome? ERJ Open Res. 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Carfì, A.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 324, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sigfrid, L.; Jesudason, E.; Lim, W.S.; Rello, J.; Amuasi, H.; Drake, T.M.; Bozza, F.; Palmieri, C.; Munblit, D.; Holter, J.C.; et al. What Is the Recovery Rate and Risk of Long-Term Consequences from COVID-19? A Harmonised, Global Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e043887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Javid Mishamandani, Z.; Norouzy, A.; Hashemian, S.M.; Khoundabi, B.; Rezaeisadrabadi, M.; Safarian, M.; Nematy, M.; Pournik, O.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Shadnoush, M.; et al. Nutritional status of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: A comprehensive report from Iranian hospitals, 2018. J. Crit. Care 2019, 54, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Barazzoni, R.; Bischoff, S.C.; Breda, J.; Wickramasinghe, K.; Krznaric, Z.; Nitzan, D.; Pirlich, M.; Singer, P. Endorsed by the EC: ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 1631–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Miller, R.; Englund, K. Clinical presentation and course of COVID-19. Clevel. Clin. J. Med. 2020, 87, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Wischmeyer, P.E. Nutrition therapy in sepsis. Crit. Care Clin. 2018, 34, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Martinez Garcia, R.M.; Jimenez Ortega, A.I.; Lopez Sobaler, A.M.; Ortega, R.M. Nutrition strategies that improve cognitive function. Nutr. Hosp. 2018, 35, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Beilharz, J.E.; Morris, M.G. Role of fat and sugar, potential mechanisms and nutritional interventions. Nutrients 2015, 7, 6719–6738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Blusztajn, J.K.; Slack, B.E.; Mellott, T.J. Neuroprotective actions of dietary choline. Nutrients 2017, 9, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Owen, L.; Corfe, B. The role of diet and nutrition on mental health and wellbeing. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 425–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Devassy, J.G.; Leng, S.; Gabbs, M.; Monirujjaman, M.; Aukema, H.M. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and oxylipins in neuroinflammation and management of Alzheimer disease. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 905–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Miquel, S.; Champ, C.; Day, J.; Aarts, E.; Bahr, B.A.; Bakke, M.; Banati, D.; Calabrese, V.; Cederholm, T.; Cryan, J.; et al. Poor cognitive ageing vulnerabilities, mechanisms and the impact of nutritional interventions. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 42, 40–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Warthon-Medina, M.; Moran, V.H.; Stammers, A.L.; Dillon, S.; Qualter, P.; Nissensohn, M.; Serra Majem, L.; Lowe, N.M. Zinc intake, status and indices of cognitive function in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 69, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Schlogl, M.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D and neurocognitive function. Clin. Interv. Aging 2014, 9, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Durga, J.; van Boxtel, M.P.; Schouten, E.G.; Kok, F.J.; Jolles, J.; Katan, M.B.; Verhoef, P. Effect of 3-year folic acid supplementation on cognitive function in older adults in the FACIT trial: A randomised, double blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2007, 369, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Aparicio Vizuete, A.; Robles, F.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, E.; Lopez-Sobaler, A.M.; Ortega, R.M. Association between food and nutrient intakes and cognitive capacity in a group of institutionalized elderly people. Eur. J. Nutr. 2010, 49, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Bourre, J.M. Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: Update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 2: Macronutrients. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2006, 10, 386–399. [Google Scholar]
  142. Kim, S.H.; Park, Y.M.; Choi, B.Y.; Kim, M.K.; Roh, S.; Kim, K.; Yang, Y.J. Associations of serum levels of vitamins A, C, and E with the risk of cognitive impairment among elderly Koreans. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2018, 12, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Markiewicz-Zukowska, R.; Gutowska, A.; Borawska, M.H. Serum zinc concentrations correlate with mental and physical status of nursing home residents. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Andruchow, N.D.; Konishi, K.; Shatenstein, B.; Bohbot, V.D. A lower ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids predicts better hippocampus-dependent spatial memory and cognitive status in older adults. Neuropsychology 2017, 31, 724–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Guo, X.M.; Liu, H.; Qian, J. Daily iron supplementation on cognitive performance in primary-school-aged children with and without anemia: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 16107–16111. [Google Scholar]
  146. Bourre, J.M. Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: Update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 1: Micronutrients. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2006, 10, 377–385. [Google Scholar]
  147. Scarmeas, N.; Anastasiou, C.A.; Yannakoulia, M. Nutrition and prevention of cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Seetharaman, S.; Andel, R.; McEvoy, C.; Dahl Aslan, A.K.; Finkel, D.; Pedersen, N.L. Blood glucose, diet-based glycemic load and cognitive aging among dementia-free older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2015, 70, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Marshall, J.S.; Portales-Cervantes, L.; Leong, E. Mast cell responses to viruses and pathogen products. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Theoharides, T.C.; Tsilioni, I.; Ren, H. Recent advances in our understanding of mast cell activation—Or should it be mast cell mediator disorders? Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 639–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Mukai, K.; Tsai, M.; Saito, H.; Galli, S.J. Mast cells as sources of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 282, 121–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hendriksen, E.; van Bergeijk, D.; Oosting, R.S.; Redegeld, F.A. Mast cells in neuroinflammation and brain disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 79, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Theoharides, T.C. COVID-19, pulmonary mast cells, cytokine storms, and beneficial actions of luteolin. Biofactors 2020, 46, 306–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Kempuraj, D.; Madhappan, B.; Christodoulou, S.; Boucher, W.; Cao, J.; Papadopoulou, N.; Cetrulo, C.L.; Theoharides, T.C. Flavonols inhibit proinflammatory mediator release, intracellular calcium ion levels and protein kinase C theta phosphorylation in human mast cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 145, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Seelinger, G.; Merfort, I.; Schempp, C.M. Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic activities of luteolin. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 1667–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Fang, L.; Karakiulakis, G.; Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Simonnet, A.; Chetboun, M.; Poissy, J.; Raverdy, V.; Noulette, J.; Duhamel, A.; Labreuche, J.; Mathieu, D.; Pattou, F.; Jourdain, M. LICORN and the Lille COVID-19 and Obesity study group. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity 2020, 28, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Louca, P.; Murra, B.; Klaser, K.; Graham, M.S.; Mazidi, M.; Leeming, E.R.; Thompson, E.; Bowyer, R.; Drew, D.A.; Nguyen, L.H.; et al. Modest effects of dietary supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from 445 850 users of the COVID-19 Symptom Study app. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2021, 4, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Mazzeo, F.; Santamaria, S.; Montesano, P. Gender difference, nutritional supplements and drug use in sport to enhancing performance: An italian revision over the last decade. Sport Mont. 2019, 17, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 01000 g001 550
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. In more aggressive cases of COVID-19, the virus can enter the bloodstream inducing an imbalance in the immune system, causing a cytokine storm. This can lead to tissue damage, ARDS and multi-organ dysfunction.
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. In more aggressive cases of COVID-19, the virus can enter the bloodstream inducing an imbalance in the immune system, causing a cytokine storm. This can lead to tissue damage, ARDS and multi-organ dysfunction.
Nutrients 14 01000 g001
Nutrients 14 01000 g002 550
Figure 2. Functions of nutrients in prevention, treatment and post-COVID 19.
Figure 2. Functions of nutrients in prevention, treatment and post-COVID 19.
Nutrients 14 01000 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Motti, M.L.; Tafuri, D.; Donini, L.; Masucci, M.T.; De Falco, V.; Mazzeo, F. The Role of Nutrients in Prevention, Treatment and Post-Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Nutrients 2022, 14, 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051000

AMA Style

Motti ML, Tafuri D, Donini L, Masucci MT, De Falco V, Mazzeo F. The Role of Nutrients in Prevention, Treatment and Post-Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Nutrients. 2022; 14(5):1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051000

Chicago/Turabian Style

Motti, Maria Letizia, Domenico Tafuri, Lorenzo Donini, Maria Teresa Masucci, Valentina De Falco, and Filomena Mazzeo. 2022. "The Role of Nutrients in Prevention, Treatment and Post-Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19)" Nutrients 14, no. 5: 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051000

APA Style

Motti, M. L., Tafuri, D., Donini, L., Masucci, M. T., De Falco, V., & Mazzeo, F. (2022). The Role of Nutrients in Prevention, Treatment and Post-Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Nutrients, 14(5), 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14051000

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop