Next Article in Journal
Dietary Patterns, Dietary Interventions, and Mammographic Breast Density: A Systematic Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
How Does Selenium Intake Differ among Children (1–3 Years) on Vegetarian, Vegan, and Omnivorous Diets? Results of the VeChi Diet Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mediterranean Alcohol-Drinking Patterns and All-Cause Mortality in Women More Than 55 Years Old and Men More Than 50 Years Old in the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) Cohort
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Strategies for Selenium and Iodine Biofortification in Crop Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Selenium Status: Its Interactions with Dietary Mercury Exposure and Implications in Human Health

1
Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
2
School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4456, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(24), 5308; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245308
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 5 December 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Selenium Intake and Human Health)

Abstract

:
Selenium is an essential trace element in humans and animals and its role in selenoprotein and enzyme antioxidant activity is well documented. Food is the principal source of selenium, and it is important that selenium status in the body is adequately maintained for physiological functions. There has been increasing attention on the role of selenium in mitigating the toxic effects of mercury exposure from dietary intake in humans. In contrast, mercury is a neurotoxin, and its continuous exposure can cause adverse health effects in humans. The interactions of selenium and mercury are multi-factorial and involve complex binding mechanisms between these elements at a molecular level. Further insights and understanding in this area may help to evaluate the health implications of dietary mercury exposure and selenium status. This review aims to summarise current information on the interplay of the interactions between selenium and mercury in the body and the protective effect of selenium on at-risk groups in a population who may experience long-term mercury exposure.

1. Introduction

Ever-increasing global industrialisation has significantly contributed to the release of chemical contaminants, including selenium (Se) and mercury (Hg), into the environment. The release and disposal of industrial wastes and coal-burning plants have significantly contributed to the global pollution of Hg and Se, and this will eventually bioaccumulate in the food chain and subsequently into humans from dietary exposure [1,2]. Of particular concern is the dietary exposure from high marine fish consumption, which is frequently being raised and debated in the media regarding the risk of high Hg exposure, the benefits of the nutritional importance of omega-3 in fish, and the presence of essential trace elements such as Se [3,4].
Se is an essential trace element that plays an important role in antioxidant selenoenzymes, and its low status in humans has been reported to be linked with increased risk of cancer, heart diseases and impaired immunity [5]. High protein foods such seafood and meat products are major sources of Se, and some marine fish such as sharks and swordfish can contain high levels of Se and Hg as predatory fish are at the top of the marine food web [6,7]. Different food types can contain different forms of Se compounds, but predominantly as selenomethionine, which is also more bioavailable than the inorganic forms of selenites and selenates [5].
In contrast, Hg is a highly toxic element and its adverse health effects in humans are well documented. The Hg poisoning incident in humans, known as Minamata disease in Japan, is well documented after consumption of contaminated fish, and the consumption of flour accidentally contaminated with organic Hg in Iraq [8,9]. Concerns about Hg poisoning has led to the establishment of the Minamata Convention to provide information on reducing Hg exposure and to safeguard the wellbeing of human populations around the world [10,11]. The levels of Hg in most foods are generally low, and it is predominantly present in marine fish and seafood in the form of methylmercury, which is lipid soluble and highly toxic [12]. There have been many studies on the protective effects of Se and its related chemical species against Hg accumulation in animal body tissues, including fish, but the results are often controversial, and the possible mechanism for the modification of Se species on Hg accumulation is extremely complex and not well understood [13]. However, it has been suggested that the reasons behind the protective effects of Se species on Hg toxicity may include the distribution of Hg into various tissues, the competition for binding sites, and the formation of Hg–Se complexes or prevention of oxidative stress [14,15,16]. It has been reported that Se can form complexes with Hg in biological tissue such as tiemannite, Se–Hg–S species or Se–Hg precipitates [17,18].
There has been increased interest in investigating the interaction between Se and Hg in fish, and in particular the effects of Se concentrations and their chemical forms on Hg bioavailability and the use of molar ratios of Se and Hg concentrations for assessment of Hg toxicity [13,19]. However, there is also a concern that high Hg exposure from diets, especially marine fish diet, could also cause a reduction in the activity of selenoenzymes as a result of strong inhibition by methylmercury, and Se depletion due to the formation of insoluble Hg selenides [20]. The complexity of Se and Hg interactions has attracted interest over recent years, especially in developing sensitive analytical methods for determining Se and Hg speciation, which are important to further understanding their interactions and bioavailability in biological systems [17,21,22]. There have been few studies on the bioavailability of Se and Hg and their chemical forms in humans from simultaneous exposure of these elements from food [17,23]. This paper aims to review the current knowledge on Se status and its abilities to interact with Hg exposure through dietary intake and to mitigate Hg toxicity that could have implications for human health, particularly for the high-risk groups in a population.
Since this paper aims to provide a brief overview of the interrelationship between Se status and Hg exposure in humans, a broad literature search was performed with PubMed and ScienceDirect on the topic. The literature search was conducted in August and September 2022 for the latest information on Se–Hg interaction relating to human health. For the PubMed literature search, this included the keywords or combinations of them related to “Se status”, “Se dietary intakes”, “Se blood”, “Hg exposure”, “Hg dietary intakes”, “Hg blood”, “Se biomarkers”, “Hg biomarkers”, “healthy human population”, “Se and Hg interactions”, and “gene expression”. The search for specific “selenium status AND mercury status AND humans” produced 149 results and the selection of the articles was based on their relevance to human health. The specific search for “Se AND Hg AND interaction AND humans” produced 169 articles, and the selections of these articles was based on Se–Hg interaction relating to human exposure and health.
For the ScienceDirect search, this included the keywords or combinations of them related to “Se chemistry”, “Hg chemistry”, “Se speciation”, “Hg speciation”, “food analysis”, “diet”, “fish”, “seafood”, “Se levels, Hg levels”, “blood”, “urine”, “hair”, and “biological tissue”. The specific search for “Se AND Hg AND speciation AND food AND humans”, excluding other animals, came with 166 results, and the selection of the articles was based on relevance to food intakes and exposure in humans. These searches also included names of authors and the area of their expertise and specialisation.

2. Chemical Characteristics and Properties of Se and Hg

Se belongs to group 16 and in position VIA between sulphur and tellurium in the periodic table. It is classified as metalloid (semimetal) with the atomic mass of 78.96 and it has six naturally occurring isotopes (Se-74, Se-82, Se-76, Se-77, Se-78, Se-80) [24]. In the ground state, Se has the electronic configuration of ([Ar] 4s23d104p4), which utilises six valence electrons and two unpaired electrons to form covalent bonds. Se can form into five allotropic structures consisting of two amorphous and three crystalline states [24,25]. Se is present in the oxidation states of Se (0), Se (-II), Se (IV) and Se (VI), which are important for forming various Se compounds in biological systems, including selenocysteine, which forms the active sites of selenoproteins with predominantly antioxidative activities [24].
Hg, with the atomic mass of 200.59, belongs to group 12 of the periodic table and is often referred to as liquid silver [26]. It has seven stable isotopes (Hg-196, Hg-198, Hg-199, Hg-200, Hg-201, Hg-202, Hg-204) [26]. Hg has the electronic configuration of [Xe]4f145d106s2, and the 6s2 electronic pair determines its low chemical reactivity. The presence of the occupied d-sublevel orbital allows Hg to form covalent bonds with halides, thiol (-SH) and selenol (-SeH) groups. Hg can also form various organic and inorganic Hg compounds, as in di-, tri- and tetranuclear clusters (Hg22+, Hg32+, Hg42+) [27].

3. Sources of Se and Hg in the Environment

The release of Se and Hg into the environment can be the result of anthropogenic and natural causes. The emission from volcanic eruptions, withering of rocks and ground water movement and degradation of vegetation are the natural causes of Se and Hg release into the environment and atmosphere [24,28]. In the aquatic environment, Se is readily present as soluble selenites (Se (IV)) or selenates (Se (VI)), and these are taken up by plants and metabolised into different forms of Se compounds, including volatile selenide and methylated Se compounds, which will eventually be released into the atmosphere [24]. Human activities can also contribute significantly to the anthropogenic sources of Se, where it is widely used in industry, including the production of electronic components, agricultural products (e.g., fertilizers, pesticides, livestock feed) and pharmaceutical and medical appliances [29].
Hg is widely used in industry for manufacturing electronic devices, paint, fungicides and waste incarnation, and subsequently these are released into the environment. The emissions from coal-burning fuel and mining activities are also major anthropogenic sources of Hg released into the atmosphere [30]. Hg is also naturally released as elemental Hg from volcanic ash, withering of rocks, forest fires, soil and vegetation volatilisation. In the environment, Hg predominantly exists in three valance states as elemental Hg (Hg (0), monovalent or mercurous Hg (Hg (I)), and divalent or mercuric Hg (Hg (II)), which can form into other inorganic and organic complexes [26,31]. The presence of Hg (I) is unstable and it readily undergoes redox processes to form elemental Hg and Hg (II), and becomes further metabolised by microorganisms to form methylated Hg as methyl and dimethyl Hg [32]. The methyl Hg is the most toxic form of Hg compound, and has complex mechanistic actions including its ability to form a low-molecular weight with thiol (-SH) that can readily transport into cells and disrupt protein functions in biological tissues [33,34].

4. Se Status and Hg Exposure

Dietary intake is the principal source of Se and the levels in foods can vary significantly depending on the Se levels in soil, which are taken up by plants and subsequently transfer to animals and humans via the food chain. The levels of Se in typical food groups are presented in Table 1.
There have been significant variations in reported Se intakes in human populations from different countries. Low Se status has been reported in countries such as New Zealand and Finland due to low levels in soils and crops. Importation of Australian wheat containing high Se content has improved the Se status in the New Zealand population [39]. In Finland, the Se-fortified fertilisers have been introduced and used in crops to improve the Se status in the population [40]. Low Se status has also occurred in some parts of the Congo, central Serbia and parts of China [41]. Extreme cases of Se deficiency in humans have caused Keshan disease in China, which is associated with cardiomyopathy, and Kashin–Beck disease, associated with degenerative osteoarthropathy [42].
In another extreme example in China, high levels of Se intake has been observed in a population from consuming food crops growing in high-Se soil that could pose a risk of Se poisoning [43]. In the USA, high-Se status has been reported in the South Dakota population where food crops are produced in an area of high-Se soil [44]. In diets, Se is taken up predominantly as both organic (selenomethionine, selenocysteine) and inorganic forms (selenites, selenates) [41]. The increased use of vitamin and mineral supplements, including Se supplements, can also contribute to increased intake of and exposure to Se. The gap between Se essentiality and toxicity is relatively narrow, and over exposure of Se is a cause of concern due to toxic effects. The risk of a high intake of selenomethionine (as L-selenomethionine), which is a commonly used Se compound in food supplements, has been comprehensively reviewed and assessed, and it has been suggested that the addition of selenomethionine in food supplements would not be a safety concern in adults at levels up to 250 µg/day, which is equivalent to 100 µg Se/day [45]. This value of 100 µg Se/day from the intake of food supplements is considerably below the Se Upper Tolerable Limit Level at 300 µg Se/day for Europe, which is also below the Upper Tolerable Intake Level for Se in the USA, at 400 µg Se/day [45,46]. The bioavailability of Se intake can be influenced by its chemical forms, and the interactions with trace elements (zinc, cadmium) and other nutrients such as methionine-containing proteins which affect the absorption in the body [47,48]. Generally, selenomethionine and selenocysteine, which are the common forms in food, are more bioavailable than the inorganic forms (selenate or selenite) [49]. In the body, the ingested compounds from diet will undergo methylation and dimethylation, and subsequently be exhaled in the breath as dimethyl selenide and excreted in urine as selenosugars and trimethylselenide [50]. The typical levels of Se dietary daily intakes of healthy populations from selected countries are shown in Table 2.
The variation in Se dietary intakes between countries has recently been reviewed [59]. The association between Se intake and adverse health effects can be presented by a U-shaped response that could indicate various clinical conditions [60]. Concern about adverse health effects has led many countries to provide recommended guidelines for adequate levels of Se daily intakes. For instance, in Australia the recommended Se daily intake for men is 70 µg/day and 60 µg/day for women, with an increase to 65 µg/day for pregnancy, and the upper limit (UL) intake at 400 µg/day [61].
With respect to mercury, the levels of Hg in foods are generally low, except for marine fish and shellfish. However, crops that grow in Hg contaminated soil can accumulate Hg from plant uptake, which can contribute to Hg exposure in human population. The levels of Hg in selected foods from selected countries are shown in Table 3.
Rice crops grown near mining areas have been shown to contain considerable amounts of Hg and could pose health risks from rice consumption; rice could contribute to Hg daily intakes in the range from 0.042 to 0.35 μg/kg bw/day, which is equivalent to 2.52 to 21.0 μg/day for an adult at 60 kg body weight (bw) [65,66]. Of greater concern is the consumption of marine fish and shellfish, which have been known to accumulate Hg in the form methyl Hg, which is a neurotoxin. The levels of methyl Hg in fish can vary significantly, and the highest levels are found in larger and older predatory fish at the top of the food web (e.g., sharks, swordfish, tuna) [67,68]. The consumption of fish and shellfish can contribute significantly to dietary exposure to methyl Hg in a population. In Europe it has been established that the tolerable weekly intake (TWI) for methyl Hg is set at 1.3 µg/kg body weight, which is equivalent to 13 µg/day as Hg for an adult weighing 70 kg [69]. Table 4 shows a typical daily Hg intake of a healthy population from selected countries.

5. Blood Se and Hg Levels

The trace element levels in blood, including Se and Hg, have been widely used in assessing the trace element status in a population. Blood Se levels can vary widely in humans, and this can be attributed to the Se levels in diets. The Se levels in blood plasma tend to indicate short-term Se status, and levels in red blood cells are indicative of long-term Se status. In blood, the Se organic forms can be oxidised to selenite or selenate and taken up by the red blood cells for delivery to the liver for metabolism and selenoproteins synthesis [82]. The levels of Se in blood plasma are consistently correlated with Se daily intake [83]. The typical levels of Se blood in a healthy population from selected countries are shown in Table 5.
Combs has provided a comprehensive review of Se biomarkers for tissue levels in blood, urine, nails and hair, and selenoproteins functions for assessing Se deficiency diseases and adverse health effects from excessive intake in humans [95]. For very high Se exposure, the biomarkers of blood plasma Se levels less than 1000 μg/L and Se intakes less than 1500 μg/day have been reported to cause no adverse health effects in human subjects [95]. In the past few years, the levels of selenoprotein P, which is predominantly found in the blood plasma, has increasingly been used for assessing the Se status in a population. Plasma selenoprotein P has been recommended as a suitable biomarker for assessing Se adequacy because it reaches a plateau at optimal levels of about 65 μg Se/L when Se intake is about 93 μg/day and over in a population [83,96]. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity in blood plasma has historically been used as a biomarker in assessing Se adequacy in humans; however, because it reaches a plateau when Se intake is about 35 μg/day, it is a less reliable biomarker than selenoprotein P [83,97]. Low selenoprotein P levels in blood as a biomarker could link to health risks, and at high levels it could provide information about possible Se toxicity (selenosis) [98].
The levels of Hg in blood are widely used to assess Hg exposure in a population because Hg is well distributed via the blood to various target organs and tissues, and is considered a reliable biomarker that can reflect both elemental and methyl Hg exposures [99]. Other biomarkers for assessing the risks of exposure from Hg toxicity and adverse health effects in humans have been comprehensively reviewed [99,100]. Table 6 shows the blood Hg levels of healthy populations from selected countries.
Exposure to Hg in a work environment is the result of inhaling air pollutants and ingesting contaminated food and water. High blood Hg has been reported in workers who were exposed to Hg vapours and consumed food near Hg mining sites [15,112,113]. In countries such as Japan, Korea and China, the high blood Hg levels have been reported to be associated with a high consumption of fish and seafood products [22,28,114]. In Japan, the Hg level in whole blood has been reported to reach 30.6 µg/L after consumption of fish and seafood [106]. High blood Hg levels (range: 0.01–241 µg/L) have also been reported in the Inuit population, whose diet is mainly marine fish and other aquatic animals [104,115]. Considerably higher blood Hg levels have also been shown in Brazilian populations from fish consumption, where the total Hg levels in plasma ranged from 2.4 to 27.3 µg/L, and 8.4 to 83.2 µg/L for whole blood [102]. A long-term fish and shellfish intake increased the blood Hg to 17 µg/L in young children and it has been reported to cause a reduction in mental ability and concentration or attention [116]. In populations where fish and seafood products are not considered as a major diet component, blood Hg levels are generally lower, and this is shown in the low blood Hg levels of the Native American population [111]. There have been a few studies on Se biomarkers that could be used to assess excessive Hg exposure from co-intakes of Se and Hg in humans. In one study, the healthy subjects (non-exposed to elemental Hg) exposed to high methyl Hg from fish consumption showed a positive correction between levels of blood Hg and plasma selenoprotein P, but not GPx, which suggests the sensitivity of selenoprotein P to Hg exposure and its demand for supplies to various organs [23]. In another study, high consumption of fish or seafood as co-dietary intakes of Se and Hg in healthy populations showed correlation between whole blood Hg and plasma Se, and there was also a correlation between dietary intakes and whole blood Hg, but not with whole blood Se or plasma Se, which indicated that the correlation was not the result of co-intakes of the two elements from seafood [117]. The inconsistency of Se status as biomarkers to assess Hg exposure could possibly be explained by the complex presence of Se molecular species in biological tissues, and, unlike Hg, Se can come from various dietary sources that could contribute to different effects on Hg exposure outcomes. For instance, different fish species have been shown to contain different forms of Se compounds, and in some fish, Se was found only as selenomethylselenocysteine (SeMeSeCys) in different protein fractions in muscle tissue; this could play a significant role in Se-Hg interactions and the effect of Hg exposure [118].
There has been increasing concern about Hg exposure in high-risk groups such as pregnant women, infants and young children. Numerous studies from various countries have assessed the Hg status in pregnant women by determining the Hg levels in blood and umbilical cord blood after birth [119,120,121]. Maternal consumption of fish has been shown to increase Hg levels in cord blood, and these levels were significantly higher than other maternal groups who did not consume fish [120]. Maternal consumption of large amounts of marine fish has been shown to be associated with increased levels of Hg in cord blood, which could result in the accumulation of Hg in infants [122]. The elevated levels of Hg in maternal blood after fish consumption have also been reported to be significantly correlated with cord blood Hg, and could pose risk to foetal development [123]. The neurodevelopmental effects of Hg exposure on infants and young children are of particular concern because of their greater vulnerability to toxicity. A number of endpoints have been investigated to determine the association between Hg exposure and neurodevelopmental effects, and these include neurocognitive, motoric and auditory, visual electrophysiological responses and neurobehavioral effects [124]. In the follow-up studies of children who were mainly on fish diets as part of the Seychelles Child Development Study, the findings did not reveal any consistent association between prenatal Hg exposure and neurodevelopment endpoints [69]. A recent study of methyl Hg exposure from fish diet in young children has shown that there was an association between high prenatal methyl Hg exposure and differential DNA methylation in children’s saliva at seven years of age at specific CpG sites of the nervous system-related genes that may influence neurodevelopment and mental health [125]. This recent finding of DNA methylation in nervous system-related genes from Hg exposure may provide further evidence of mechanisms of developmental neurotoxicity.
Concern about the increased Hg exposure in populations has caused government regulatory bodies in many countries to provide information on strategies to reduce exposure from ingesting contaminated food and water, and inhaling polluted air. Over the years there have been declining trends of blood Hg levels in some countries, but in others the blood levels are increasing, and this is due to increased industrial development in these countries [100,126].

6. Se and Hg Interactions and Health Implications

The consumption of fish and seafood is a major dietary source of protein in many parts of the world, and this could also be a major contributor to essential nutrients and contaminants including essential Se and the toxic metal Hg. There has been increasing interest in the study of interactions between Se and Hg since it was observed that Se could reduce Hg toxicity by increasing its elimination, and there are significant correlations between these two elements in fish and other seafood tissues [127,128]. Each form of Se compound is effective in reducing Hg toxicity by forming inert Se–Hg complexes in biological tissues; however, this effectiveness is also dependent on the Se and Hg chemical forms. For instance, selenite, selenomethionine and selenocysteine can have similar effects in eliminating methyl Hg, but not selenate, to reduce Hg toxicity in shrimps [129]. However, selenate and selenocysteine are more effective than selenomethionine and selenite in reducing the toxicity of inorganic Hg (II) by elimination in fish [13]. In rat studies, the effectiveness of Se compounds in reducing Hg toxicity can generally be presented in the order of greater to lesser effectiveness as: selenomethionine > selenocysteine > selenate > selenite [130,131].
Even though there have been numerous studies on Se–Hg interactions in animals, these studies have not been clearly demonstrated in humans and these may have health implications such as the effects of Hg on cancer, neurodevelopment and immunity [68,132,133,134,135]. However, human cell lines have been used to investigate the effectiveness of Se compounds on the toxicity of Hg compounds that specifically targeted the thioredoxin systems for mechanisms of toxicity [99,136].
It has been demonstrated in animal studies that both Hg (II) and methyl Hg can cause oxidative stress from the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in biological tissues, and the presence of Se can remove the effects of ROS through its roles in antioxidant selenoenzymes such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) of the thioredoxin (Trx) systems [137,138]. The production of ROS after exposure to mercury chloride (HgCl2) has been demonstrated in human endometrial stromal cells which caused decreases in cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis and could be linked to human infertility [139]. Both the glutathione and thioredoxin systems are the targets of Hg compounds, and it has been shown that elevated Hg levels in the form of ethyl mercury in human neuroblastoma cell lines caused depletion of GPx and TrxR due to oxidation, leading to caspase activation and apoptosis [140]. In neuroblastoma cell lines, the presence of methyl Hg affected TrxR more than GPx, but the addition of Se compounds in the form of diphenyl diselenide ((PhSe)2) and ebselen helped to protect and restore the activities of these selenoenzymes [141]. The potential actions of these Se compounds against Hg toxicity include their ability to scavenge ROS, and in particular (PhSe)2, but not ebselen, to induce the synthesis of TrxR for maintaining cell homeostasis [138,141].
The proposed mechanisms of Hg toxicity and its attack on the integrity of the selenoenzymes, particularly mammalian Trx systems, which consist of mammalian cytosolic Trx1 and mitochondrial Trx2, have attracted increasing attention. The Trx network is very sensitive to the exposure of Hg compounds because it contains dithiol active sites (-Cys-Gly-Pro-Cys-) and three additional cysteine residues that have binding affinity for Hg compounds, and this could lead to a loss of catalytic activity [142,143]. The binding of Hg to sulphur at the cysteine active site has been suggested as the mechanism of Hg toxicity as a result of S-Hg bonds (methyl-Hg-S-Cys, Hg-S-Cys) that would alter the protein structure in tissues [128,143,144,145]. Like sulphur, the presence of selenocysteine as an active site in TrxR, and its attack by Hg compounds, could also lead to the formation of Se–Hg bonds. However, by comparing the binding affinity of sulphur with Hg in physiological conditions, Se (log k = 45) is millions of times greater than S (log k = 39) [18,33].
The strong binding formation of Se-Hg in biological systems has been suggested as a basis of the Se protective effect against Hg toxicity. By forming inert methyl-Hg-Se-R and Hg-Se complexes, Hg is distributed to various tissues for elimination and may reduce its toxicity, but this could also lead to Se deficiency, decreased selenoprotein levels and decreased selenoenzyme activities [120]. The formation of methyl-Hg complexes with S or Se has been proposed for the mechanisms of Hg toxicity in the brain as it passes through the blood-brain-barrier [146]. Se is particularly important to brain function, and when Se is depleted in other tissues, it is maintained in the brain for homeostasis [133,147]. Severe Se deficiency could cause irreversible brain injury from Hg toxicity, and the preserved expression of two thioredoxin reductases (cytoplasmic TrxR1 and mitochondrial TrxR2) in the brain could also play an important role in protection against chronic Hg exposure [18,137]. Hg compounds (inorganic and organic Hg) have been shown to cross the blood-placental barrier in several studies, both in vivo and in vitro; however, the specific molecular mechanisms of Hg crossing the placental barrier are not fully understood [148]. In a pregnant rat study, the exposure to inorganic Hg (HgCl2) caused an increase in Hg levels in placental and foetal organs, which were also dependent on the time and the dose of exposure [149]. In a recent study of pregnant Japanese women, it was observed that methyl Hg levels in the red blood cells and plasma of cord blood were significantly higher than in maternal blood, suggesting that some inorganic Hg was trapped in the placenta and that methyl Hg in cord blood could be easily absorbed by the foetal brain [150].
It has been suggested that the demethylation of Hg compounds with the formation of inert Hg-Se complexes, and the binding of Hg-Se into selenoprotein P (SelP) structure, could also be the mechanistic actions of Se protective effects in tissues [18,133,151]. In fish, after being exposed to methyl Hg and treated with different dietary Se levels, this has caused a significant increase in the demethylation of methyl Hg and the reduction of its accumulation in tissues [151,152]. In animal studies, treatment with a Se-rich diet has caused a reduction of Hg accumulation levels in brain, liver and kidney [16,153]. Increased dietary Se intake in mice treated with methyl Hg has been shown to reduce the accumulation of methyl Hg in target tissues and prevent redox-mediated immunosuppression [134]. These animal studies seem to provide evidence that the presence of Se at certain levels during Hg exposure reduces the distribution and accumulation of Hg in tissues, and thus reduces Hg toxicity. However, a recent study has shown that mice co-administrated intragastrically with Hg (methyl Hg or inorganic Hg) and Se (selenite) developed a significant increase in Hg levels in tissues (brain, kidney, liver, spleen) compared to levels administered only with Hg, indicating that Se could promote the absorption of Hg into tissues [154].
The Hg toxic effects in these tissues have been shown to be associated with the concentration of a molar ratio of Se:Hg, and if the molar ratio value is greater than one, this would indicate a greater amount of Se for protection against Hg toxicity, particularly with respect to the concentration of Se and Hg in fish [155]. The molar ratio of Se:Hg is based on the calculation of molar concentration of total Se divided by molar concentration of total Hg. This Se:Hg molar ratio has been proposed as a useful criterion to assess Hg toxicity in blood and other tissues, and to determine the relationship between methyl Hg (total Hg) and toxicity [153]. High values of Se:Hg molar ratios (range: 5–625) for Se and Hg concentrations in human placenta have been used to assess the potential of Hg toxicity; however, the basis of the molar ratio criterion is questionable because Se can bind to other cations and different forms of Hg compounds in tissues [121,128].
In a population where the principal dietary source of protein is fish and seafood, the Se:Hg molar ratio has been used as a guideline to assess the risk of Hg toxicity. In Norway, a comprehensive survey of marine fish species has shown a wide variation of Se and Hg concentrations, with Se:Hg molar ratios greater than 1, ranging from 1.5 to 51.1 for all fish species, indicating a low risk of Hg toxicity [156]. Freshwater fish species have also been shown to contain low levels of Hg, and because of high Se:Hg molar ratio values, the serving of freshwater fish meals per week has been advised to women, particularly for women of childbearing age [157].
Even though the Se:Hg molar ratio has been useful as a guideline for assessing the risk of consuming fish and seafood, it has not been included in any policy of advisory or regulatory bodies on the recommendation for required safe intake of fish and seafood. In Europe, EFSA has suggested that each country has to assess and advise its own population on the recommendation of adequate fish and seafood intake because there is a significant variation of dietary patterns of fish and seafood intake between countries [158]. However, because fish can be important sources of essential nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, alphalinolecic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), various countries have provided guidelines for the amount of fish intake for a population. There is also a variation on the recommendation of fish and seafood intake between countries [159]. For instance, in Australia, the recommendation for pregnant women is 150 g (Orange Roughy fish) per week or 150 g of shark flake per fortnight [160]. In the USA, the intake of Orange Roughy or shark is not recommended for women of childbearing age [161]. For the UK, pregnant women are recommended to take 170 g of raw tuna or 140 g of cooked weight per week, but limit intake of oily fish [159].

7. Concluding Remarks

Insights into further understanding the mechanisms of Se and Hg interactions at a molecular level are important if the effects of Hg toxicity can be alleviated by specific selenium compounds at their optimal concentration required for the protection of target tissues. This area of investigation remains a major challenge because of the complexity of these interactions, involving the competition and transportation of Se and Hg compounds (inorganic and organic compounds) and subsequent transformation in biological tissues [148]. The long-term effects of low dose Hg exposure and the health implications are still unclear, particularly the effects on pregnant women and their infants. A recent study on gene expression profiles from low dose Hg exposure could affect the functions of autophagy of mitochondrion and oxidative stress, and may alter genes for immune function in pregnant women and newborns that could lead to negative effects on fine motor skills in young children [162,163]. Until there is new insight on biomarkers of Hg toxicity from the long-term exposure, it is important that the at-risk groups in a population should avoid or minimise Hg exposure and ensure that adequate daily intake of Se is maintained.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.T. and A.V.P.; writing—original draft preparation, U.T.; writing—review and editing, U.T. and A.V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seixas, T.G.; Moreira, I.; Kehrig, H.A. Mercury and selenium in seston, marine plankton and fish (Sardinella brasiliensis) as a tool for understanding a tropical food web. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 101, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rayman, M.P. Food-chain selenium and human health: Emphasis on intake. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 100, 254–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mozaffarian, D. Fish, mercury, selenium and cardiovascular risk: Current evidence and unanswered questions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1894–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Park, K.; Mozaffarian, D. Omega-3 fatty acids, mercury, and selenium in fish and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2010, 12, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tinggi, U. Selenium: Its role as antioxidant in human health. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2008, 13, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Myers, G.J.; Davidson, P.W.; Strain, J.J. Nutrient and methyl mercury exposure from consuming fish. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2805–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tinggi, U. Determination of selenium in meat products by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. AOAC Int. 1999, 82, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bakir, F.; Damluji, S.F.; Amin-Zaki, L.; Murtadha, M.; Khalidi, A.; al-Rawi, N.Y.; Tikriti, S.; Dahahir, H.I.; Clarkson, T.W.; Smith, J.C.; et al. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 1973, 181, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ekino, S.; Susa, M.; Ninomiya, T.; Imamura, K.; Kitamura, T. Minamata disease revisited: An update on the acute and chronic manifestations of methyl mercury poisoning. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007, 262, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sakamoto, M.; Chan, H.M.; Domingo, J.L.; Koriyama, C.; Murata, K. Placental transfer and levels of mercury, selenium, vitamin E, and docosahexaenoic acid in maternal and umbilical cord blood. Environ. Int. 2018, 111, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. UNEP. Minamata Convention on Mercury—Text and Annexes 2019. Available online: https://www.mercuryconvention.org/en/resources/minamata-convention-mercury-text-and-annexes (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  12. Balshaw, S.; Edwards, J.; Daughtry, B.; Ross, K. Mercury in seafood: Mechanisms of accumulation and consequences for consumer health. Rev. Environ. Health 2007, 22, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dang, F.; Wang, W.X. Antagonistic interaction of mercury and selenium in a marine fish is dependent on their chemical species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3116–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cabanero, A.I.; Madrid, Y.; Camara, C. Selenium long-term administration and its effect on mercury toxicity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4461–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, C.; Yu, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, B.; Qu, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, P.; Chai, Z. The roles of serum selenium and selenoproteins on mercury toxicity in environmental and occupational exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Su, L.; Wang, M.; Yin, S.T.; Wang, H.L.; Chen, L.; Sun, L.G.; Ruan, D.Y. The interaction of selenium and mercury in the accumulations and oxidative stress of rat tissues. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cabanero, A.I.; Madrid, Y.; Camara, C. Mercury-selenium species ratio in representative fish samples and their bioaccessibility by an in vitro digestion method. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2007, 119, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khan, M.A.; Wang, F. Mercury-selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: Toward a molecular understanding of the mercury-selenium antagonism. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28, 1567–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ralston, N.V.; Blackwell, J.L., 3rd; Raymond, L.J. Importance of molar ratios in selenium-dependent protection against methylmercury toxicity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2007, 119, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ralston, N.V.; Raymond, L.J. Dietary selenium’s protective effects against methylmercury toxicity. Toxicology 2010, 278, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jagtap, R.; Maher, W.; Krikowa, F.; Ellwood, M.J.; Foster, S. Measurement of selenomethionine and selenocysteine in fish tissues using HPLC-ICP-MS. Microchem. J. 2016, 128, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sogame, Y.; Tsukagoshi, A. Development of a liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in human blood. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed Life Sci. 2020, 1136, 121855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kuras, R.; Kozlowska, L.; Reszka, E.; Wieczorek, E.; Jablonska, E.; Gromadzinska, J.; Stanislawska, M.; Janasik, B.; Wasowicz, W. Environmental mercury exposure and selenium-associated biomarkers of antioxidant status at molecular and biochemical level. A short-term intervention study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 130, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ullah, H.; Lun, L.; Rashid, A.; Zada, N.; Chen, B.; Shahab, A.; Li, P.; Ali, M.U.; Lin, S.; Wong, M.H. A critical analysis of sources, pollution, and remediation of selenium, an emerging contaminant. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Saji, V.S.; Lee, C. Selenium electrochemistry. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 10058–10077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beckers, F.; Rinklebe, J. Cycling of mercury in the environment: Sources, fate, and human health implications: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 47, 693–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tinkov, A.A.; Ajsuvakova, O.P.; Skalnaya, M.G.; Popova, E.V.; Sinitskii, A.I.; Nemereshina, O.N.; Gatiatulina, E.R.; Nikonorov, A.A.; Skalny, A.V. Mercury and metabolic syndrome: A review of experimental and clinical observations. Biometals 2015, 28, 231–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, K.H.; Kabir, E.; Jahan, S.A. A review on the distribution of Hg in the environment and its human health impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 306, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Johnson, C.C.; Fordyce, F.M.; Rayman, M.P. Factors controlling the distribution of selenium in the environment and their impact on health and nutrition. In Proceedings of the Over- and Undernutrition: Challenges and Approaches, Guildford, UK, 30 June–2 July 2009; pp. 119–132. [Google Scholar]
  30. Driscoll, C.T.; Mason, R.P.; Chan, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Pirrone, N. Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathways, and effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4967–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stein, D.E.; Cohen, Y.; Winer, A.M. Environmental distribution and transformation of mercury compounds. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 26, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, W.L.; Liu, Y.R.; Guan, W.Y.; Zhong, H.; Qu, X.M.; Zhang, T. Understanding mercury methylation in the changing environment: Recent advances in assessing microbial methylators and mercury bioavailability. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 136827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nogara, P.A.; Oliveira, C.S.; Schmitz, G.L.; Piquini, P.C.; Farina, M.; Aschner, M.; Rocha, J.B.T. Methylmercury’s chemistry: From the environment to the mammalian brain. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 129284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Okpala, C.O.R.; Sardo, G.; Vitale, S.; Bono, G.; Arukwe, A. Hazardous properties and toxicological update of mercury: From fish food to human health safety perspective. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1986–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pappa, E.C.; Pappas, A.C.; Surai, P.F. Selenium content in selected foods from the Greek market and estimation of the daily intake. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 372, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jenny-Burri, J.; Haldimann, M.; Dudler, V. Estimation of selenium intake in Switzerland in relation to selected food groups. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2010, 27, 1516–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Choi, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, C.; Hwang, I.K.; Park, H.K.; OH, C. Selenium content in representative Korean foods. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McNaughton, S.A.; Marks, G.C. Selenium Content of Australian Foods: A Review of Literature Values. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thomson, C.D. Selenium and iodine intakes and status in New Zealand and Australia. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 91, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alfthan, G.; Eurola, M.; Ekholm, P.; Venalainen, E.R.; Root, T.; Korkalainen, K.; Hartikainen, H.; Salminen, P.; Hietaniemi, V.; Aspila, P.; et al. Effects of nationwide addition of selenium to fertilizers on foods, and animal and human health in Finland: From deficiency to optimal selenium status of the population. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 31, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Radomska, D.; Czarnomysy, R.; Radomski, D.; Bielawska, A.; Bielawski, K. Selenium as a Bioactive Micronutrient in the Human Diet and Its Cancer Chemopreventive Activity. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J. An original discovery: Selenium deficiency and Keshan disease (an endemic heart disease). Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 21, 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang, H.; Wang, Q.; Gao, J.; Lin, Z.; Banuelos, G.S.; Yuan, L.; Yin, X. Daily dietary selenium intake in a high selenium area of Enshi, China. Nutrients 2013, 5, 700–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Olson, O.E.; Palmer, I.S. Selenium in foods purchased or produced in South Dakota. J. Food Sci. 1984, 49, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). L-selenomethionine as a source of selenium added for nutritional purposes to food supplements. EFSA J. 2009, 1082, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  46. IM (Institute of Medicine). Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements; Otten, J.J., Pitzi Hellwig, J., Meyers, L.D., Eds.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  47. Waschulewski, I.H.; Sunde, R.A. Effect of dietary methionine on utilization of tissue selenium from dietary selenomethionine for glutathione peroxidase in the rat. J. Nutr. 1988, 118, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yin, S.A.; Sato, I.; Hosokawa, Y.; Niizeki, S.; Tojo, H.; Yamaguchi, K. Effects of dietary zinc and cadmium on tissue selenium concentration and glutathione peroxidase activity in rats fed DL-selenomethionine or sodium selenite. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 1991, 37, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Fairweather-Tait, S.J.; Collings, R.; Hurst, R. Selenium bioavailability: Current knowledge and future research requirements. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1484S–1491S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Roman, M.; Jitaru, P.; Barbante, C. Selenium biochemistry and its role for human health. Metallomics 2014, 6, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. FSANZ. The 22nd Australian Total Diet Study; FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand): Canberra, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  52. Waegeneers, N.; Thiry, C.; De Temmerman, L.; Ruttens, A. Predicted dietary intake of selenium by the general adult population in Belgium. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2013, 30, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gao, J.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Banuelos, G.S.; Lam, M.H.; Yin, Y. Daily selenium intake in a moderate selenium deficiency area of Suzhou, China. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1088–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Emmanuelle, B.; Virginie, M.; Fabienne, S.; Isabelle, I.; Martine, P.G.; Bernard, L.; Sylvie, R. Selenium exposure in subjects living in areas with high selenium concentrated drinking water: Results of a French integrated exposure assessment survey. Environ. Int. 2012, 40, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hirai, K.; Noda, K.; Danbara, H. Selenium intake based on representative diets in Japan, 1957 to 1989. Nutr. Res. 1996, 16, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Duffield, A.J.; Thomson, C.D. A comparison of methods of assessment of dietary selenium intakes in Otago, New Zealand. Br. J. Nutr. 1999, 82, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sunde, R.A.; Paterson, E.; Evenson, J.K.; Barnes, K.M.; Lovegrove, J.A.; Gordon, M.H. Longitudinal selenium status in healthy British adults: Assessment using biochemical and molecular biomarkers. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 99 (Suppl. 3), S37–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Shu, Y.; Wu, M.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. Association of dietary selenium intake with telomere length in middle-aged and older adults. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 3086–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ullah, H.; Liu, G.; Yousaf, B.; Ali, M.U.; Abbas, Q.; Munir, M.A.M.; Mian, M.M. Developmental selenium exposure and health risk in daily foodstuffs: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 149, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rayman, M.P. Selenium intake, status, and health: A complex relationship. Hormones 2020, 19, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. DHA; NHMRC. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand; Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  62. Dabeka, R.W.; McKenzie, A.D.; Bradley, P. Survey of total mercury in total diet food composites and an estimation of the dietary intake of mercury by adults and children from two Canadian cities, 1998–2000. Food Addit. Contam. 2003, 20, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rubio, C.; Gutierrez, A.; Burgos, A.; Hardisson, A. Total dietary intake of mercury in the Canary Islands, Spain. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2008, 25, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Perello, G.; Llobet, J.M.; Gomez-Catalan, J.; Castell, V.; Centrich, F.; Nadal, M.; Domingo, J.L. Human health risks derived from dietary exposure to toxic metals in Catalonia, Spain: Temporal trend. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 162, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, P.; Feng, X.; Chan, H.M.; Zhang, X.; Du, B. Human Body Burden and Dietary Methylmercury Intake: The Relationship in a Rice-Consuming Population. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 9682–9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pang, J.; Han, J.; Fan, X.; LI, C.; Dong, X.; Liang, L.; Chen, Z. Mercury speciation, bioavailability and risk assessment on soil–rice systems from a watershed impacted by abandoned Hg mine-waste tailings. Acta Geochim. 2019, 38, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dabeka, R.W.; McKenzie, A.D.; Forsyth, D.S. Levels of total mercury in predatory fish sold in Canada in 2005. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2011, 28, 740–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gribble, M.O.; Karimi, R.; Feingold, B.J.; Nyland, J.F.; O’Hara, T.M.; Gladyshev, M.I.; Chen, C.Y. Mercury, selenium and fish oils in marine food webs and implications for human health. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2016, 96, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. FSANZ. 25th Australian Total Diet Study; FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand): Canberra, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  71. Munoz, O.; Bastias, J.M.; Araya, M.; Morales, A.; Orellana, C.; Rebolledo, R.; Velez, D. Estimation of the dietary intake of cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic by the population of Santiago (Chile) using a Total Diet Study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 1647–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sun, J.; Wang, C.; Song, X.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, B.; Liu, P. Dietary intake of mercury by children and adults in Jinhu area of China. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2011, 214, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Leblanc, J.C.; Guerin, T.; Noel, L.; Calamassi-Tran, G.; Volatier, J.L.; Verger, P. Dietary exposure estimates of 18 elements from the 1st French Total Diet Study. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 624–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pandit, G.G.; Jha, S.K.; Tripathi, R.M.; Krishnamoorthy, T.M. Intake of methyl mercury by the population of Mumbai, India. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 205, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Iwasaki, Y.; Sakamoto, M.; Nakai, K.; Oka, T.; Dakeishi, M.; Iwata, T.; Satoh, H.; Murata, K. Estimation of daily mercury intake from seafood in Japanese women: Akita cross-sectional study. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2003, 200, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kim, S.A.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, S.; Joung, H. Assessment of Dietary Mercury Intake and Blood Mercury Levels in the Korean Population: Results from the Korean National Environmental Health Survey 2012–2014. Int. J. Environ. Re.s Public Health 2016, 13, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Lee, H.; Cho, Y.; Park, S.; Kye, S.; Kim, B.; Hahm, T.; Kim, M.; Lee, J.O.; Kim, C. Dietary exposure of the Korean population to arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, S31–S37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Marzec, Z.; Schlegel-Zawadzka, M. Exposure to cadmium, lead and mercury in the adult population from Eastern Poland, 1990–2002. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Rodellar, S.; Fontcuberta, M.; Arques, J.F.; Calderon, J.; Ribas Barba, L.; Serra-Majem, L.L. Mercury and methylmercury intake estimation due to seafood products for the Catalonian population (Spain). Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2010, 27, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. COT. Committee on Toxicity (COT) Statement on the 2006 UK Total Diet Study of Metals and Other Elements; Food Standards Agency: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  81. Egan, S.K.; Tao, S.S.; Pennington, J.A.; Bolger, P.M. US Food and Drug Administration’s Total Diet Study: Intake of nutritional and toxic elements, 1991–1996. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Suzuki, K.T. Metabolomics of selenium: Se metabolites based on speciation studies. J. Health Sci. 2005, 51, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Burk, R.F.; Hill, K.E. Regulation of Selenium Metabolism and Transport. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015, 35, 109–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Komarova, T.; McKeating, D.; Perkins, A.V.; Tinggi, U. Trace Element Analysis in Whole Blood and Plasma for Reference Levels in a Selected Queensland Population, Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yedomon, B.; Menudier, A.; Etangs, F.L.D.; Anani, L.; Fayomi, B.; Druet-Cabanac, M.; Moesch, C. Biomonitoring of 29 trace elements in whole blood from inhabitants of Cotonou (Benin) by ICP-MS. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017, 43, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nisse, C.; Tagne-Fotso, R.; Howsam, M.; Members of Health Examination Centres of the Nord—Pas-de-Calais Region Network; Richeval, C.; Labat, L.; Leroyer, A. Blood and urinary levels of metals and metalloids in the general adult population of Northern France: The IMEPOGE study, 2008–2010. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2017, 220, 341–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Abass, K.; Koiranen, M.; Mazej, D.; Tratnik, J.S.; Horvat, M.; Hakkola, J.; Jarvelin, M.R.; Rautio, A. Arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury levels in blood of Finnish adults and their relation to diet, lifestyle habits and sociodemographic variables. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 1347–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Heitland, P.; Koster, H.D. Human biomonitoring of 73 elements in blood, serum, erythrocytes and urine. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 64, 126706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Raghunath, R.; Tripathi, R.M.; Mahapatra, S.; Sadasivan, S. Selenium levels in biological matrices in adult population of Mumbai, India. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 285, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kim, H.J.; Lim, H.S.; Lee, K.R.; Choi, M.H.; Kang, N.M.; Lee, C.H.; Oh, E.J.; Park, H.K. Determination of Trace Metal Levels in the General Population of Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Karunasinghe, N.; Han, D.Y.; Zhu, S.; Duan, H.; Ko, Y.J.; Yu, J.F.; Triggs, C.M.; Ferguson, L.R. Effects of supplementation with selenium, as selenized yeast, in a healthy male population from New Zealand. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stojsavljevic, A.; Jagodic, J.; Vujotic, L.; Borkovic-Mitic, S.; Rasic-Milutinovic, Z.; Jovanovic, D.; Gavrovic-Jankulovic, M.; Manojlovic, D. Reference values for trace essential elements in the whole blood and serum samples of the adult Serbian population: Significance of selenium deficiency. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tranik, J.S.; Falnoga, I.; Mazej, D.; Kocman, D.; Fajon, V.; Jagodic, J.; Stajnko, A.; Trdin, A.; Slejkovec, Z.; Jeran, Z.; et al. Results of the first national human biomonitoring in Slovenia: Trace elements in men and lactating women, predictors of exposure and reference values. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 563–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Jain, R.B.; Choi, Y.S. Normal reference ranges for and variability in the levels of blood manganese and selenium by gender, age, and race/ethnicity for general U.S. population. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 30, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Combs, G.F., Jr. Biomarkers of selenium status. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2209–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Hurst, R.; Collings, R.; Harvey, L.J.; King, M.; Hooper, L.; Bouwman, J.; Gurinovic, M.; Fairweather-Tait, S.J. EURRECA-Estimating selenium requirements for deriving dietary reference values. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 1077–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xia, Y.; Hill, K.E.; Li, P.; Xu, J.; Zhou, D.; Motley, A.K.; Wang, L.; Byrne, D.W.; Burk, R.F. Optimization of selenoprotein P and other plasma selenium biomarkers for the assessment of the selenium nutritional requirement: A placebo-controlled, double-blind study of selenomethionine supplementation in selenium-deficient Chinese subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Schomburg, L. Selenoprotein P—Selenium transport protein, enzyme and biomarker of selenium status. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 191, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Branco, V.; Caito, S.; Farina, M.; Teixeira da Rocha, J.; Aschner, M.; Carvalho, C. Biomarkers of mercury toxicity: Past, present, and future trends. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2017, 20, 119–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sharma, B.M.; Sanka, O.; Kalina, J.; Scheringer, M. An overview of worldwide and regional time trends in total mercury levels in human blood and breast milk from 1966 to 2015 and their associations with health effects. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 300–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Hinwood, A.L.; Callan, A.C.; Ramalingam, M.; Boyce, M.; Heyworth, J.; McCafferty, P.; Odland, J.O. Cadmium, lead and mercury exposure in non smoking pregnant women. Environ. Res. 2013, 126, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Carneiro, M.F.; Grotto, D.; Barbosa, F., Jr. Inorganic and methylmercury levels in plasma are differentially associated with age, gender, and oxidative stress markers in a population exposed to mercury through fish consumption. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2014, 77, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kuno, R.; Roquetti, M.H.; Becker, K.; Seiwert, M.; Gouveia, N. Reference values for lead, cadmium and mercury in the blood of adults from the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2013, 216, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jeppesen, C.; Jorgensen, M.E.; Bjerregaard, P. Assessment of consumption of marine food in Greenland by a food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2012, 71, 18361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ilmiawati, C.; Yoshida, T.; Itoh, T.; Nakagi, Y.; Saijo, Y.; Sugioka, Y.; Sakamoto, M.; Ikegami, A.; Ogawa, M.; Kayama, F. Biomonitoring of mercury, cadmium, and lead exposure in Japanese children: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2015, 20, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Nakayama, S.F.; Iwai-Shimada, M.; Oguri, T.; Isobe, T.; Takeuchi, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Michikawa, T.; Yamazaki, S.; Nitta, H.; Kawamoto, T.; et al. Blood mercury, lead, cadmium, manganese and selenium levels in pregnant women and their determinants: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Eom, S.Y.; Choi, S.H.; Ahn, S.J.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, D.W.; Lim, J.A.; Choi, B.S.; Shin, H.J.; Yun, S.W.; Yoon, H.J.; et al. Reference levels of blood mercury and association with metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2014, 87, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Son, J.Y.; Lee, J.; Paek, D.; Lee, J.T. Blood levels of lead, cadmium, and mercury in the Korean population: Results from the Second Korean National Human Exposure and Bio-monitoring Examination. Environ. Res. 2009, 109, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bjermo, H.; Sand, S.; Nalsen, C.; Lundh, T.; Enghardt Barbieri, H.; Pearson, M.; Lindroos, A.K.; Jonsson, B.A.; Barregard, L.; Darnerud, P.O. Lead, mercury, and cadmium in blood and their relation to diet among Swedish adults. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 57, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Almerud, P.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Lindroos, A.K.; Bjermo, H.; Andersson, E.M.; Lundh, T.; Ankarberg, E.H.; Lignell, S. Cadmium, total mercury, and lead in blood and associations with diet, sociodemographic factors, and smoking in Swedish adolescents. Environ. Res. 2021, 197, 110991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Li, Z.; Lewin, M.; Ruiz, P.; Nigra, A.E.; Henderson, N.B.; Jarrett, J.M.; Ward, C.; Zhu, J.; Umans, J.G.; O’Leary, M.; et al. Blood cadmium, lead, manganese, mercury, and selenium levels in American Indian populations: The Strong Heart Study. Environ. Res. 2022, 71, 114101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li, P.; Li, Y.; Feng, X. Mercury and selenium interactions in human blood in the Wanshan mercury mining area, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Saalidong, B.M.; Aram, S.A. Mercury Exposure in Artisanal Mining: Assessing the Effect of Occupational Activities on Blood Mercury Levels Among Artisanal and Small-Scale Goldminers in Ghana. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 4256–4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zeng, H.L.; Li, H.; Lu, J.; Guan, Q.; Cheng, L. Assessment of 12 Metals and Metalloids in Blood of General Populations Living in Wuhan of China by ICP-MS. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 189, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Achouba, A.; Dumas, P.; Ouellet, N.; Lemire, M.; Ayotte, P. Plasma levels of selenium-containing proteins in Inuit adults from Nunavik. Environ. Int. 2016, 96, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hong, Y.S.; Kim, D.S.; Yu, S.D.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, Y.M.; Yu, J.H.; Jung, J.H.; Kim, B.G. Four cases of abnormal neuropsychological findings in children with high blood methylmercury concentrations. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 25, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Ser, P.H.; Omi, S.; Shimizu-Furusawa, H.; Yasutake, A.; Sakamoto, M.; Hachiya, N.; Konishi, S.; Nakamura, M.; Watanabe, C. Differences in the responses of three plasma selenium-containing proteins in relation to methylmercury-exposure through consumption of fish/whales. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 267, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fernandez-Bautista, T.; Gomez-Gomez, B.; Palacin-Garcia, R.; Gracia-Lor, E.; Perez-Corona, T.; Madrid, Y. Analysis of Se and Hg biomolecules distribution and Se speciation in poorly studied protein fractions of muscle tissues of highly consumed fishes by SEC-UV-ICP-MS and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Talanta 2022, 237, 122922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Caetano, T.; Branco, V.; Cavaco, A.; Carvalho, C. Risk assessment of methylmercury in pregnant women and newborns in the island of Madeira (Portugal) using exposure biomarkers and food-frequency questionnaires. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2019, 82, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gilman, C.L.; Soon, R.; Sauvage, L.; Ralston, N.V.; Berry, M.J. Umbilical cord blood and placental mercury, selenium and selenoprotein expression in relation to maternal fish consumption. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2015, 30, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Kosik-Bogacka, D.; Lanocha-Arendarczyk, N.; Kot, K.; Malinowski, W.; Szymanski, S.; Sipak-Szmigiel, O.; Pilarczyk, B.; Tomza-Marciniak, A.; Podlasinska, J.; Tomska, N.; et al. Concentrations of mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) in afterbirth and their relations with various factors. Environ. Geochem. Health 2018, 40, 1683–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Fok, T.F.; Lam, H.S.; Ng, P.C.; Yip, A.S.; Sin, N.C.; Chan, I.H.; Gu, G.J.; So, H.K.; Wong, E.M.; Lam, C.W. Fetal methylmercury exposure as measured by cord blood mercury concentrations in a mother-infant cohort in Hong Kong. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Song, Y.; Lee, C.K.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, J.T.; Suh, C.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Son, B.C.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S. Factors associated with total mercury concentrations in maternal blood, cord blood, and breast milk among pregnant women in Busan, Korea. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 25, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Aaseth, J.; Wallace, D.R.; Vejrup, K.; Alexander, J. Methylmercury and developmental neurotoxicity: A global concern. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2020, 19, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ulloa, A.C.; Gliga, A.; Love, T.M.; Pineda, D.; Mruzek, D.W.; Watson, G.E.; Davidson, P.W.; Shamlaye, C.F.; Strain, J.J.; Myers, G.J.; et al. Prenatal methylmercury exposure and DNA methylation in seven-year-old children in the Seychelles Child Development Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 147, 106321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Basu, N.; Horvat, M.; Evers, D.C.; Zastenskaya, I.; Weihe, P.; Tempowski, J. A State-of-the-Science Review of Mercury Biomarkers in Human Populations Worldwide between 2000 and 2018. Environ. Health Perspect. 2018, 126, 106001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Ganther, H.E.; Goudie, C.; Sunde, M.L.; Kopecky, M.J.; Wagner, P. Selenium: Relation to decreased toxicity of methylmercury added to diets containing tuna. Science 1972, 175, 1122–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Gochfeld, M.; Burger, J. Mercury interactions with selenium and sulfur and the relevance of the Se:Hg molar ratio to fish consumption advice. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 18407–18420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Bjerregaard, P.; Christensen, A. Selenium reduces the retention of methyl mercury in the brown shrimp Crangon crangon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6324–6329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Fang, S.C. Interaction of selenium and mercury in the rat. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1977, 17, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Magos, L.; Clarkson, T.W.; Sparrow, S.; Hudson, A.R. Comparison of the protection given by selenite, selenomethionine and biological selenium against the renotoxicity of mercury. Arch. Toxicol. 1987, 60, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Bellinger, F.P.; Raman, A.V.; Reeves, M.A.; Berry, M.J. Regulation and function of selenoproteins in human disease. Biochem. J. 2009, 422, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Bjorklund, G.; Aaseth, J.; Ajsuvakova, O.P.; Nikonorov, A.A.; Skalny, A.V.; Skalnaya, M.G.; Tinkov, A.A. Molecular interaction between mercury and selenium in neurotoxicity. Coord Chem. Rev. 2017, 332, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, X.; Yin, D.; Yin, J.; Chen, Q.; Wang, R. Dietary selenium protect against redox-mediated immune suppression induced by methylmercury exposure. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 72, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Skalny, A.V.; Aschner, M.; Sekacheva, M.I.; Santamaria, A.; Barbosa, F.; Ferrer, B.; Aaseth, J.; Paoliello, M.M.B.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Tinkov, A.A. Mercury and cancer: Where are we now after two decades of research? Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 164, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Branco, V.; Godinho-Santos, A.; Goncalves, J.; Lu, J.; Holmgren, A.; Carvalho, C. Mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase inhibition, selenium status, and Nrf-2 activation are determinant factors modulating the toxicity of mercury compounds. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 73, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yang, D.Y.; Chen, Y.W.; Gunn, J.M.; Belzile, N. Selenium and mercury in organisms: Interactions and mechanisms. Environ. Rev. 2008, 16, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhang, G.; Nitteranon, V.; Guo, S.; Qiu, P.; Wu, X.; Li, F.; Xiao, H.; Hu, Q.; Parkin, K.L. Organoselenium compounds modulate extracellular redox by induction of extracellular cysteine and cell surface thioredoxin reductase. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013, 26, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Palomar, A.; Gonzalez-Martin, R.; Perez-Deben, S.; Medina-Laver, Y.; Quinonero, A.; Dominguez, F. Mercury impairs human primary endometrial stromal cell functiondagger. Biol. Reprod. 2022, 106, 1022–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Branco, V.; Coppo, L.; Sola, S.; Lu, J.; Rodrigues, C.M.P.; Holmgren, A.; Carvalho, C. Impaired cross-talk between the thioredoxin and glutathione systems is related to ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in neuronal cells exposed to mercury. Redox Biol. 2017, 13, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Meinerz, D.F.; Branco, V.; Aschner, M.; Carvalho, C.; Rocha, J.B.T. Diphenyl diselenide protects against methylmercury-induced inhibition of thioredoxin reductase and glutathione peroxidase in human neuroblastoma cells: A comparison with ebselen. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017, 37, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Branco, V.; Carvalho, C. The thioredoxin system as a target for mercury compounds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019, 1863, 129255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Carvalho, C.M.; Chew, E.H.; Hashemy, S.I.; Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. Inhibition of the human thioredoxin system. A molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 11913–11923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Ajsuvakova, O.P.; Tinkov, A.A.; Aschner, M.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Michalke, B.; Skalnaya, M.G.; Skalny, A.V.; Butnariu, M.; Dadar, M.; Sarac, I.; et al. Sulfhydryl groups as targets of mercury toxicity. Coord Chem. Rev. 2020, 417, 213343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ralston, N.V.C.; Raymond, L.J. Mercury’s neurotoxicity is characterized by its disruption of selenium biochemistry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2018, 1862, 2405–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Bjorklund, G. Selenium as an antidote in the treatment of mercury intoxication. Biometals 2015, 28, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kuhbacher, M.; Bartel, J.; Hoppe, B.; Alber, D.; Bukalis, G.; Brauer, A.U.; Behne, D.; Kyriakopoulos, A. The brain selenoproteome: Priorities in the hierarchy and different levels of selenium homeostasis in the brain of selenium-deficient rats. J. Neurochem. 2009, 110, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bridges, C.C.; Zalups, R.K. Mechanisms involved in the transport of mercuric ions in target tissues. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 91, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Oliveira, C.S.; Joshee, L.; Zalups, R.K.; Pereira, M.E.; Bridges, C.C. Disposition of inorganic mercury in pregnant rats and their offspring. Toxicology 2015, 335, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Sakamoto, M.; Haraguchi, K.; Tatsuta, N.; Nakai, K.; Nakamura, M.; Murata, K. Plasma and red blood cells distribution of total mercury, inorganic mercury, and selenium in maternal and cord blood from a group of Japanese women. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Wang, X.; Wang, W.X. Selenium induces the demethylation of mercury in marine fish. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 231, 1543–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wang, X.; Wu, F.; Wang, W.X. In Vivo Mercury Demethylation in a Marine Fish (Acanthopagrus schlegeli). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6441–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ralston, N.V.; Ralston, C.R.; Blackwell, J.L., 3rd; Raymond, L.J. Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology 2008, 29, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Liu, J.; Cui, J.; Wei, X.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Chen, M.; Fan, Y.; Wang, J. Investigation on selenium and mercury interactions and the distribution patterns in mice organs with LA-ICP-MS imaging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1182, 338941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Golzadeh, N.; Barst, B.D.; Basu, N.; Baker, J.M.; Auger, J.C.; McKinney, M.A. Evaluating the concentrations of total mercury, methylmercury, selenium, and selenium:mercury molar ratios in traditional foods of the Bigstone Cree in Alberta, Canada. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Azad, A.M.; Frantzen, S.; Bank, M.S.; Nilsen, B.M.; Duinker, A.; Madsen, L.; Maage, A. Effects of geography and species variation on selenium and mercury molar ratios in Northeast Atlantic marine fish communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 1482–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Reyes-Avila, A.D.; Laws, E.A.; Herrmann, A.D.; DeLaune, R.D.; Blanchard, T.P. Mercury and selenium levels, and Se:Hg molar ratios in freshwater fish from South Louisiana. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2019, 54, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Statement on the benefits of fish/seafood consumption compared to the risks of methylmercury in fish/seafood. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Taylor, C.M.; Emmett, P.M.; Emond, A.M.; Golding, J. A review of guidance on fish consumption in pregnancy: Is it fit for purpose? Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 2149–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. FSANZ. Mercury in Fish—Advice on Fish Consumption. FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand). Available online: www.foodstandards.gov.au (accessed on 7 September 2022).
  161. Groth, E. Scientific foundations of fish-consumption advice for pregnant women: Epidemiological evidence, benefit-risk modeling, and an integrated approach. Environ. Res. 2017, 152, 386–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Wen, F.; Feng, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Li, P. Effects of Low-dose Mercury Exposure in Newborns on mRNA Expression Profiles. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 107, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Prpic, I.; Milardovic, A.; Vlasic-Cicvaric, I.; Spiric, Z.; Radic Nisevic, J.; Vukelic, P.; Snoj Tratnik, J.; Mazej, D.; Horvat, M. Prenatal exposure to low-level methylmercury alters the child’s fine motor skills at the age of 18 months. Environ. Res. 2017, 152, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Typical Selenium levels in food from selected countries.
Table 1. Typical Selenium levels in food from selected countries.
FoodSelenium Level (µg/kg)CountryReference
Milk and dairy products
Milk10.7–16.2Greece[35]
Milk10.0–14.0Switzerland[36]
Milk60.0Korea[37]
Milk22.5–25.9Australia[38]
Cheese24.1–95.4Greece[35]
Cheese70.0–78.9Australia[38]
Meat and eggs
Beef33.5–6.31Greece[35]
Beef67 ± 23Switzerland[36]
Beef324Korea[37]
Lamb80Switzerland[36]
Chicken76.3–82.4Greece[35]
Chicken114 ± 17Switzerland[36]
Pork90.0–98.2Greece[35]
Pork115 ± 75Switzerland[36]
Pork174–199Korea[37]
Eggs56.4–181.1Greece[35]
Eggs190–414Australia[38]
Cereals
Bread37.9–150.2Greece[35]
Bread23–48Switzerland[36]
Bread216Korea[37]
Bread92.6–125Australia[38]
Rice17.7–20.5Greece[35]
Rice50Korea[37]
Rice25Australia[38]
Fruit and vegetables
Apple1.1–1.9Greece[35]
Banana4.3–5.7Greece[35]
Pear4.7–7.9Greece[35]
Broccoli6.1–11.8Greece[35]
Broccoli6Korea[37]
Carrot3.6–8.5Greece[35]
Potato3.1–6.0Greece[35]
Fish and seafood
Sardine261.5–332.8Greece[35]
Trout28.7–96.9Greece[35]
White fish210 ± 58Switzerland[36]
Perch303 ± 46Switzerland[36]
Tuna659Korea[37]
Shrimp251Korea[37]
Fish120–632Australia[38]
Table 2. Selenium daily intake from selected countries.
Table 2. Selenium daily intake from selected countries.
Se Intake (µg/day)Age GroupPopulation GroupCountryReference
67–90AdultsMenAustralia[51]
52–57AdultsWomenAustralia[51]
59.6AdultsallBelgium[52]
44AdultsallChina[53]
60AdultsMenFinland[40]
50AdultsWomenFinland[40]
52 ± 14AdultsallFrance[54]
39.3AdultsallGreece[35]
98AdultsallJapan[55]
57.5AdultsallKorea[37]
51 ± 26AdultsallNew Zealand[56]
60 ± 25AdultsMenNew Zealand[56]
46 ± 26AdultsWomenNew Zealand[56]
50.4AdultsallSwitzerland[36]
48 ± 14AdultsallUK[57]
54 ± 15AdultsMenUK[57]
43 ± 11AdultsWomenUK[57]
92.1 ± 42.6AdultsallUSA[58]
Table 3. Typical mercury levels in food from selected countries.
Table 3. Typical mercury levels in food from selected countries.
FoodMercury Level (µg/kg)CountryReference
Milk and dairy products
Cheese<0.27–1.8Canada[62]
Cheese0.37 ± 0.15Spain[63]
Milk0.25 ± 0.06Spain[63]
Milk<0.13–0.25Canada[62]
Meat and eggs
Eggs0.45 ± 0.16Spain[63]
Eggs0.39–1.5Canada[62]
Beef0.42–1.8Canada[62]
Lamb0.29–2.3Canada[62]
Pork0.68–1.9Canada[62]
Red meat0.54 ± 0.19Spain[63]
Fish and seafood
Cuttlefish34Spain[64]
Fish (freshwater)69–83Canada[62]
Fish canned63–148Canada[62]
Prawn91Spain[64]
Sardine (fresh)80Spain[64]
Squid52Spain[64]
Swordfish1500Spain[64]
Tuna (fresh)680Spain[64]
Cereals and grains
Wheat and bran<0.45–1.4Canada[62]
Bread0.14–0.37Canada[62]
Rice0.57–1.8Canada[62]
Vegetable and fruit
Bean<0.12–0.22Canada[62]
Broccoli0.40–0.67Canada[62]
Corn<0.11–0.21Canada[62]
Potatoes<0.08–0.16Canada[62]
Table 4. Total mercury intake from selected country.
Table 4. Total mercury intake from selected country.
Intake (µg/day)Age GroupPopulation GroupCountryReference
4.6–12.9AdultsallAustralia[70]
0.77–2.17 *AdultsallCanada[62]
5AdultsallChile[71]
5.74 (2.87–12.9) *AdultsMenChina[72]
5.27 (2.34–10.55) **AdultsWomenChina[72]
9.65AdultsallFrance[73]
0.5AdultsallIndia[74]
15.3 (2.65–48.4) ***AdultsWomenJapan[75]
3.8 ± 5.26AdultsallKorea[76]
1.61AdultsallKorea[77]
6.65 ± 2.01 (3.2–10.7)AdultsMenPoland[78]
5.21 ± 1.56 (2.9–9.5)AdultsWomenPoland[78]
5.57AdultsallSpain[63]
7.45 *AdultsMenSpain[79]
7.0 *AdultsWomenSpain[79]
1.0–3.0AdultsallUK[80]
1.25–2.59AdultsMenUSA[81]
0.97–1.95AdultsWomenUSA[81]
* An asterisk indicates conversion of body weight intake (µg/Kg bw/day) to µg/day. ** Closed brackets indicate range values. *** Values are expressed in geometric mean (GM).
Table 5. Selenium levels in blood from selected countries.
Table 5. Selenium levels in blood from selected countries.
Blood Se Levels (µg/L)Blood MatrixPopulation GroupCountryReference
141 (118–224)Whole bloodallAustralia[84]
142 (118–224)Whole bloodMenAustralia[84]
140 (122–203)Whole bloodWomenAustralia[84]
130 (82–180)PlasmaallAustralia[84]
130 (101–161)PlasmaMenAustralia[84]
124 (82–179)PlasmaWomenAustralia[84]
163.0 * (123–205)Whole bloodallBenin[85]
89.3 (68–245)Whole bloodallBrazil[86]
109.1 (949.5–195.2)Whole bloodMenFinland[87]
97.9 (30.0–244.8)Whole bloodWomenFinland[87]
107 (75–146)Whole bloodallGermany[88]
32–178Whole bloodallIndia[89]
35.8–185.6SerumallIndia[89]
111.4 ** (79.1–166.5)SerumallKorea[90]
55.3–207.4SerumMenKorea[90]
70.4–171.7SerumWomenKorea[90]
111.5SerumMenNew Zealand[91]
66.3 (63.0–71.2)SerumMenSerbia[92]
63.8 (61.9–70.2)SerumWomenSerbia[92]
115 * (60.3–226)Whole bloodMenSlovenia[93]
94.6 * (53.9–176)Whole bloodWomenSlovenia[93]
89.2 ± 12.6PlasmaallUK[57]
91.6 ± 12.6PlasmaMenUK[57]
87.6 ± 13.4PlasmaWomenUK[57]
146.8-247.3 ***Whole bloodallUSA[94]
149.4–250.4 ***Whole bloodMenUSA[94]
144.2–244.6 ***Whole bloodWomenUSA[94]
* Values are expressed as geometric mean (GM) and range from 5% to 95% percentiles. ** Values are expressed as geometric mean (GM) and range from 2.5% to 97.5% percentiles. *** Range values 2.5% to 97.5% percentiles.
Table 6. Mercury levels in blood from selected country.
Table 6. Mercury levels in blood from selected country.
Blood Hg Levels (µg/L)Blood MatrixPopulation GroupCountryReference
0.83 (<0.2–5.80)Whole bloodPregnant womenAustralia[101]
2.0 (<0.8–9.3)Whole bloodAllAustralia[84]
2.1 (<0.8–7.7)Whole bloodMenAustralia[84]
1.8 (<0.8–9.3)Whole bloodWomenAustralia[84]
3.12 (1.11–7.64) *Whole bloodAllBenin[85]
8.4–83.2Whole bloodAllBrazil[102]
9.6 (2.4–27.3)PlasmaAllBrazil[102]
1.4 (0.10–12.40)Whole bloodAllBrazil[103]
21.1 ± 24.7Whole bloodAllDenmark[104]
0.65 (0.03–3.5)Whole bloodAllGermany[88]
0.2 (<0.02–1.1)SerumAllGermany[88]
5.11 ± 2.19 (1.16–15.79)Whole bloodChildren (M and F)Japan[105]
4.41 (0.35–30.6)Whole bloodAllJapan[106]
3.12–5.66 *Whole bloodMenKorea[107]
2.45–3.85 *Whole bloodWomenKorea[107]
3.12 (2.96–3.28)Whole bloodAllKorea[76]
4.94 (4.66–3.53) **Whole bloodMenKorea[108]
3.27 (3.13–3.42)Whole bloodWomenKorea[108]
1.3 (0.39–4.4)Whole bloodMenSweden[109]
0.97 (0.17–2.9)Whole bloodWomenSweden[109]
0.77 (0.71–0.83)Whole bloodAdolescents (M)Sweden[110]
0.60 (0.56–0.64)Whole bloodAdolescents (W)Sweden[110]
0.359 *Whole bloodAllUSA[111]
* Values are expressed in geometric mean (GM) with range values in closed brackets from 25% to 95% percentiles. ** Range values in closed brackets are expressed in confidence interval (CI).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tinggi, U.; Perkins, A.V. Selenium Status: Its Interactions with Dietary Mercury Exposure and Implications in Human Health. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5308. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245308

AMA Style

Tinggi U, Perkins AV. Selenium Status: Its Interactions with Dietary Mercury Exposure and Implications in Human Health. Nutrients. 2022; 14(24):5308. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245308

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tinggi, Ujang, and Anthony V. Perkins. 2022. "Selenium Status: Its Interactions with Dietary Mercury Exposure and Implications in Human Health" Nutrients 14, no. 24: 5308. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245308

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop