Effect of Inulin Intervention on Metabolic Control and Methylation of INS and IRS1 Genes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
by
, ,
Ollin Celeste Martínez-Ramírez
1,*
,
Azucena Salazar-Piña
1,
Ximena Cerón-Ramírez
1,
Julieta Rubio-Lightbourn
2,
Fernando Torres-Romero
1,
Leonora Casas-Avila
3 and
Clementina Castro-Hernández
4 1
Facultad de Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca C.P. 62350, Morelos, Mexico
2
Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México C.P. 04510, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Medicina Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 14389, Mexico
4
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México C.P. 14080, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(23), 5195; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14235195
Submission received: 13 October 2022
/
Revised: 25 November 2022
/
Accepted: 28 November 2022
/
Published: 6 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics)
Abstract
:Background and Aims: Currently, treatments are being sought to improve the control of type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and inulin has been shown to be effective in reducing glucose levels and other metabolic control parameters. These effects on metabolic control may be associated with changes in the epigenetic modulation of genes of the insulin pathway. Therefore, our objective is to determine the effect of agave inulin in metabolic control parameters and in INS and IRS1 genes’ methylation in T2DM patients. Methods: This was a longitudinal experimental study with 67 Mexican participants who received an intervention of inulin agave (10 g daily) for 2 months. The methylation of the INS and IRS1 genes was determined by MSP. Results: For the INS gene, we found a significant decrease in the proportions of T2DM patients with methylated DNA after inulin intervention (p = 0.0001). In contrast, the difference in the proportions of the unmethylated IRS1 gene before and after the inulin intervention was not significant (p = 0.79). On the other hand, we observed changes in the number of T2DM patients’ recommended categories for metabolic control depending on the methylation of INS and IRS1 genes before and after treatment with inulin. Conclusion: For the first time, we report the modification in the methylation of two genes, INS and IRS1, of the insulin pathway and provide information on the possible relevant role of epigenetics as a key factor in positive changes in metabolic control parameters by inulin intake in T2DM patients.
1. Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains a disease of great importance worldwide due to its high and increasing prevalence. In recent decades, the incidence of diabetes in Mexico has progressively increased from 5.8% in the National Health Survey 2000 [1] to 7.0% in the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006 [2], to 9.2% in 2012 [3], and to 10.3% in 2018. This latest prevalence represents just over 8.6 million people with a prior medical diagnosis of the disease in Mexico in 2018 [4]. T2DM is a complex disease developed by the progressive loss of insulin secretion in β cells of the pancreas and/or by decreased insulin sensitivity in peripheral target organs that is often associated with age, obesity, lack of physical activity, first-degree family history, and/or with a strong genetic predisposition [5]; however, the genetic etiology of T2DM is still poorly studied.
Epigenetics studies the mechanisms that regulate gene expression without modifying the DNA sequence. These mechanisms include DNA methylation, chromatin modification, and the action of noncoding RNAs and allow genes to be expressed or silenced depending on several conditions, such as biological, lifestyle, and environmental factors, indicating that cells undergo these challenges throughout life [6,7]. DNA methylation is the most studied mechanism and involves the covalent attachment of a methyl group to a cytosine residue to generate 5-methylcytosine (5mC) [7,8]. This union occurs specifically in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides, which are grouped in the genome as repetitive sequences constituting the so-called CpG islands [9].
These CpG islands are especially abundant in gene promoter regions and other regulatory areas. The methylation of CpG islands within promoter regions is associated with gene silencing, and this process is dynamic; unmethylated sequences are capable of being methylated, and methyl groups can be lost [7]. These alterations appear in response to environmental and lifestyle factors, such as diet, exercise, alcohol use, or tobacco use, and they are associated with changes in gene expression and pathological dysfunctions [6]. Several studies have reported the relationship between genetic variation and DNA methylation with respect to T2DM, but it is unknown whether DNA methylation is a mediator in the disease pathway or if it is altered in response to the disease state [10,11,12]. Despite the exponential increase in epigenetic research in the last decade, the status of alterations in DNA methylation in the blood of human subjects with T2DM remains limited [13]. An approach involving candidate genes for quantifying the methylation status of specific CpG sites within genes associated with the development or risk of developing T2DM is increasingly being utilized. Insulin (INS) is the main product synthesized by pancreatic β-cells [14], and a relationship has been found between the methylation of the INS gene promoter and the regulation of INS gene expression in both pancreatic islets and β-cells [15,16]. Moreover, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), a substrate of the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase, is a critical element in insulin signaling pathways, and mutations in this gene have been reported to play an important role in the determination of susceptibility to T2DM-related traits [17,18]. Due to the increasing prevalence of T2DM, it is important to improve the results of T2DM treatments. The actions used to control this disease include multidisciplinary interventions, pharmacological treatments, and alternative options that are intended to help with the pharmacological treatments of T2DM in addition to exerting an impact on metabolic control and the prevention of T2DM complications. Among the existing alternative options, agave inulin, a highly water-soluble oligosaccharide currently used as a prebiotic [19], has been shown to be effective in reducing plasma glucose levels in diabetic patients. In obesity, dyslipidemia, and mouse model studies [20], the level of GLP-1 in serum has also been shown to be increased, affecting IL-6 secretion, IL-6 production, and hepatic gluconeogenesis, which results in moderate tolerance to insulin and blood glucose lowering [21], thereby promoting insulin secretion, promoting pancreatic β cell proliferation, controlling muscle cell glycogen synthesis, controlling fiber amounts, and providing satiety [22].
For the abovementioned factors, we hypothesized that methylation of the INS and IRS1 genes would change while improving the metabolic control parameters in T2DM patients.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Studied Population
An intervention with agave inulin was performed on outpatients of the Hospital of Huitzuco Guerrero, Mexico, who were diagnosed in 2018 with T2DM. The subjects were invited to participate in the present study directly in the outpatient clinic and by telephone. The outpatients who agreed to participate in the protocol signed an informed consent letter.
Prior to this project, an experimental, longitudinal study was performed. The studied population consisted of 67 outpatients with an established diagnosis of T2DM. The inclusion criteria for the selected outpatients were as follows: Age between 30 and 70 years; previous diagnosis of T2DM for at least 12 months; under pharmacological treatment for at least 6 months; fiber intervention of less than 30 g; no gastrointestinal or thyroid diseases; not pregnant or breastfeeding; no intervention with prebiotics, probiotics, lipid-lowering drugs, or antibiotics; and no smokers or alcohol users.
It is important to mention that in this study, the controls were the subjects before the intervention with inulin, that is, each subject was its own control. This design is accepted in longitudinal studies since the biases in the study decrease because the data on age, sex, socioeconomic level, etc., do not change before and after the intervention.
2.2. Intervention with Agave Inulin
The intervention was performed for a total period of 8 weeks. At the initial visit of the studied population, a peripheral blood sample was obtained, and the following data were collected: Biochemical data, anthropometric analyses, body composition, and questionnaires about sociodemographic data, adherence to the basic drug for T2DM, food registry, and physical activity.
The participants were given one agave inulin sachet (10 g) every day for 4 weeks. Then, the abovementioned measures were determined, and the participants were given additional inulin sachets for 4 weeks. At the end of the 8-week intervention, a blood sample was collected, and the abovementioned measures were determined.
During the intervention with inulin, we maintained communication by telephone with the outpatients, and in the few cases in which there was difficulty in communicating, we went to the participants’ homes to conduct a timely follow-up.
Inulin is a safe supplement and was approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, FDA) as a safe substance in 2003 [23]. Daily intakes for the U.S. and Europe have been estimated at up to 10 g. On the other hand, some diets can contain considerable amounts of inulin or oligofructose (up to 20 g) [24]. Due to this, the dose that was provided to the participants from start to finish was not intolerable at any time by the patients.
2.3. Body Composition
The anthropometric measurements included weight and height for the determination of the body mass index (BMI) using the following formula: BMI = weight (kg)/height (m2). The BMI was divided into normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), obesity grade I (BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2), obesity grade II (BMI 35.0–39.9 kg/m2), and obesity grade III (BMI > 40.0 kg/m2) according to the classification of the World Health Organization [25]. The waist circumference, fat mass, and muscle mass were obtained with a Tanita HBF-514C scale and a SECA portable stadiometer (Medical Scale Model 214, Seca Corp., ON, Canada).
2.4. Dietary Evaluation
The dietary evaluation was performed with 24-h recall during the 8 weeks, and the obtained data were analyzed using the AZ nutrition program (version 23.8), which refers to the System Mexican Food Equivalents 4th edition [26]. The reference indicators used are based on the intake recommendations for nutrients for the Mexican population.
2.5. Biochemical Data
The analyzed biochemical data included fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol (c-LDL), and uric acid. These parameters were determined before and after the intervention with the agave inulin.
2.6. DNA Extraction and Methylation-Specific PCR (MSP) Conditions
Before and after the intervention with agave inulin, 5 mL of peripheral blood was collected from all participants, isolated, and stored at −20 °C. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the peripheral blood using a standard separation procedure by salinization as previously described [27]. The DNA samples were quantified by UV spectrophotometry using a Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) to determine the concentration and purity of the DNA. Genomic DNA, 500 ng, was treated with sodium bisulfite with the EZ DNA Methylation kit (ZIMO, 5005), which is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis.
CpGenome universal methylated DNA (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) was used as a positive control for methylated DNA and CpGenome universal unmethylated DNA (Merck millipore) was used as a control for unmethylated. Template-free H2O was included as a negative control for the MSP.
The CpG sites studied are in a CpG island in the promoter of INS and IRS1 genes. The primers used were designed by the Methyl Primer Express v.1.0 software (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) from data deposited in GenBank.
For the INS gene, the region −1500 to +100 was included (chr11:2155610-2155813). Primers sequences for the methylated reaction were 5′-TATAGTACGGTTGGGTCGC-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-ATTATTTCTAACCTCGACCGC-3′ (reverse primer) and for the unmethylated reaction were 5′-TAGTATAGTATGGTTGGGTTGT-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-ACTATTATTTCTAACCTCAACCAC-3′) (reverse primer). The annealing temperature was 59 °C generating a 106-bp fragment, and the amplified sequence contains 22 CpG sites.
For the IRS1 gene, the region −1556 to −148 was included (chr2:226797367-226800196). Primers sequences for the methylated reaction were 5′-CGAGGAGATGAAATCGTTATC-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-ATACCGACTTCCCGCTACT-3′ (reverse primer) and for the unmethylated reaction were 5′-ATTTGAGGAGATGAAATTGTTATT-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-CATACCAACTTCCCACTACTC-3′) (reverse primer). The annealing temperature was 61 °C generating a 156-bp fragment, and the amplified sequence contains 244 CpG sites.
The resulting MSP products were extracted from agarose gels using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced with ABI BigDye using an ABI 310 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences obtained were compared with sequences from the NCBI database using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi accessed on 16 November 2020) to confirm amplicon identities.
2.7. Statistical Analyses
For the analysis of the parameters of the metabolic control and methylated status of the INS and IRS1 genes, the parameters recommended and not recommended were categorized according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines and the International Diabetes Federation [25,28,29].
2.7.1. Recommended Body Composition Parameters
The recommended body composition parameters were as follows: BMI of 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; waist circumference in men of ≤101 cm and in women of ≤87; fat mass in men of ≤24.9% and in women of ≤32.9%; and muscle mass in men of 40–50% and in women of 30–40%. Parameters outside these ranges were considered not recommended.
2.7.2. Recommended Biochemical Parameters
The recommended biochemical parameters were as follows: Fasting glucose of ≤126 mg/dL; triglycerides of ≤149 mg/dL; cholesterol of ≤199 mg/dL; c-LDL of ≤100 mg/dL; uric acid in men of ≤6.9 mg/dL and in women of ≤5.9 mg/dL. Parameters outside these ranges were considered not recommended.
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.3.0 software and SPSS version 25. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables and McNemar’s test was used to compare the categorical dates before and after the intervention with inulin. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
2.8. Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
The protocol was approved by the General Direction of the Hospital of Huitzuco Guerrero, Mexico and by the Investigation Committee of the State Health Services of the state of Guerrero, Mexico, and was registered in the Book of Protocols of the Department of Health Investigation/SES Guerrero with the folio number 08160718. Each patient signed an informed consent document.
3. Results
The characteristics of the study population before and after the agave inulin intervention are summarized in Table 1. The studied population had a higher prevalence of women (65.7%) with an average age of 54.4 years.
Regarding the anthropometric variables, statistically significant differences were found in weight, BMI, abdominal circumference, and muscle mass after the intervention with agave inulin (Table 1).
We observed a statistically significant decrease in BMI after the intervention with agave inulin ( = 30.4 vs. = 29.8; p < 0.001). The abdominal circumference was significantly decreased after the intervention ( = 99.5) compared to the waist circumference prior to the intervention ( = 100.3). Significant changes were also observed in muscle mass values. Regarding the biochemical data, the fasting glucose levels were significantly decreased after the intervention ( = 144.7) compared to the initial value ( = 164.5), and the triglyceride levels were significantly decreased after the intervention ( = 171) compared to the initial value ( = 221.3). Both results were slightly elevated in accordance with the ATP III classification. Moreover, cholesterol decreased after the intervention compared to before the intervention, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Next, the methylation, hemimethylation, and unmethylation of the INS and IRS1 genes of the studied population were determined. The INS gene was methylated before and after the intervention in 76.1% and 52.2% of the participants, respectively. Concerning the hemimethylated status for the INS gene, 23.8% of the studied population presented this status before the intervention with an increase of 23.9% postintervention. For the IRS1 gene, the hemimethylated status was present in 22.3% and 19.4% of participants pre- and post-intervention, respectively. For the INS gene, 77.6% and 80.6% of the participants had an unmethylated status before and after the intervention, respectively (Table 2).
A statistically significant difference was found in the uric acid parameter between the treatment before and after the intervention with agave inulin (Table 3).
On the other hand, interesting results were observed when we divide the categorized parameters considering the methylation, hemimethylation, and non-methylation of the INS and IRS1 genes before and after the intervention.
As shown in Table 4, the number of people with the methylated INS gene decreased in the recommended c-LDL category (p = 0.06) and in the recommended uric acid category (p = 0.0012) after the intervention with agave inulin. On the other hand, when we found the unmethylated IRS1 gene, the number of people with non-recommended muscle mass was reduced after the intervention (p = 0.01). In contrast, the number of people with recommended uric acid decreased significantly after the intervention with agave inulin when the IRS1 gene was hemimethylated (p = 0.007).
4. Discussion
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), excess weight and obesity are major public health problems affecting Mexico, and the characteristics of the population included are consistent with these data [30]. Unfortunately, pre-intervention, we did not find any subjects with normal weight, and most of the population presented uncontrolled biochemical parameters. Post-intervention, four of the nine parameters increased their percentage in the recommended categories. Because metabolic parameters can be modified by several factors, we determined that there were no significant changes in adherence related to the intervention, diet, and physical activity between the beginning and the end of the intervention. Regarding the 13 people who changed from overweight to normal weight, these results reinforce the scientific evidence of the benefits of inulin consumption in humans [23]. However, since the patients were using antidiabetic medications, and these medications have been associated with decreased body weight, these results could be partially related to the intake of glycemic control drugs.
On the other hand, we found that the number of subjects in the uric acid parameter changed significantly comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention. These results may be associated with the modulation exerted by inulin on the gut microbiome, which is capable of modulating uric acid levels [31,32].
Inulin is not digested in the human gastrointestinal system but is fermented by gut bacteria. Through fermentation, the end-products are lactate and short-chain fatty acids, including acetate [33]. We hypothesize that this modulation of the intestinal microbiota explains the control of metabolic parameters due to the decrease in chronic inflammation caused by endotoxins.
The significant decrease in the methylated levels of the INS gene post-intervention with inulin may be due to the induction of DNA demethylation mechanisms. Recently, epigenetic mechanisms involving the intestinal microbiota have taken on great importance in the possible explanation of metabolic diseases such as T2DM. However, few studies have been published addressing this issue. Zhang et al. reported modulation in gene expression associated with epigenetic changes. Previous reports have shown that depending on where the DNA methylation is in the genomic sequence, methylation can have various effects on gene function, such as gene silencing [7]. A previous study on diabetic and nondiabetic participants showed that there are increased levels of methylation at four CpG sites in the promoter region of the INS gene in pancreatic islets obtained from diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic patients; the methylation levels of these sites, along with nine other sites in the region, are negatively correlated with the expression of the same gene, which may suggest that the insulin gene is subject to regulation by epigenetic factors [16].
When we divided the recommended and non-recommended parameters of metabolic control including methylation of the INS and IRS1 genes, the BMI classification results were found to be significantly associated with the presence of INS gene methylation before and after the intervention in the studied population. Previous epigenome studies have reported that there are CpG islands, approximately 500, which may be methylated in relation to BMI [34,35]. The causality between BMI and DNA methylation has been analyzed, suggesting that BMI and its change have a causal effect on DNA methylation [35].
The nonsignificant change in hemimethylation in the IRS1 gene may suggest that the gene promoter DNA methylation mechanism may not be affected due to the metabolic changes that occurred in the participants in the agave inulin intervention. It has been reported that epigenetic changes may be the cause of the disease, a consequence of the disease, or a factor that indirectly contributes via environmental exposures that may affect the epigenome [36,37].
In the present study, the results suggested that DNA methylation may be a reversible and dynamic process that requires continuous regulation. Until a few years ago, the mechanisms of a process called demethylation were unknown. According to Bhutani et al., the following two main mechanisms for demethylation are known: Passive demethylation and active demethylation [38]. Passive demethylation is performed by the decrease or absence of DNMT activity, especially DNMT1, during the maintenance of 5mC after cell replication, thus losing methylation in the hemimethylated strand [38]. In contrast, active demethylation occurs in response to changes in cell signals based on two pathways, namely, the oxidative pathway of the methyl group of 5mC and the cytosine deamination pathway induced by cellular repair mechanisms for the generation of a cytosine [38]. However, it is not yet clear how these mechanisms explain the defects found in a disease, such as T2DM, because the active pathways have not yet been characterized under pathological conditions.
Most previous studies that have related methylation levels to blood glucose have reported that increased methylation is associated with prolonged exposure to high glucose levels, which in turn could be associated with a decrease in the expression of the involved genes [11,15,36].
We determined gene methylation in DNA from cells taken from peripheral blood because epigenetic biomarkers in blood have more clinical potential than pancreatic islets as islets cannot be non-invasively assessed. There is evidence that DNA methylation changes in blood cells reflect the epigenetic changes identified in human pancreatic islets and can reflect insulin secretion [39,40,41,42,43].
It is also important to mention that since the Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects the cumulative glucose exposure of erythrocytes over 3 months and the intervention lasted 2 months, we do not consider it necessary to carry out this measurement [44]; however, since HbA1c is a reliable marker of diabetes control, it would be important to include it in future studies.
There are a few limitations in our study, which could have affected our findings. First, our study population included only 67 participants and may thus be too small to detect differential DNA methylation and strong associations with the characteristics of study participants. Secondly, the MSP technique is qualitative, due to which we were not able to establish quantitative relationships with the metabolic control parameters.
5. Conclusions
For the first time, we report the modification in the methylation of two genes, INS and IRS1, of the insulin pathway and provide information on the possible relevant role of epigenetics as a key factor in positive changes in metabolic control parameters by inulin intake in T2DM patients.
Further studies are needed to confirm the possible relationship between gene methylation of the insulin pathway and the benefits in metabolic markers of inulin intake.
Author Contributions
Study conception and design: O.C.M.-R., C.C.-H., J.R.-L., and X.C.-R. Support for access to biological samples from patients and drafting of manuscript: A.S.-P. and F.T.-R. Analysis, and interpretation of data: O.C.M.-R. and L.C.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported in part by the Programa de Salud y Ambiente, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (U.R.9029), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The protocol was approved by the General Direction of the Hospital of Huitzuco Guerrero, Mexico and by the Investigation Committee of the State Health Services of the state of Guerrero, Mexico, and was registered in the Book of Protocols of the Department of Health Investigation/SES Guerrero with the folio number 08160718.
Informed Consent Statement
Each patient signed an informed consent document.
Data Availability Statement
Supporting Data is available upon request to corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest.
References
- Olaiz, G.; Rojas, R.; Barquera, S.; Shamah, T.; Aguilar, C.; Cravioto, P.; López, P.; Hernández, M.; Tapia, R.; Sepúlveda, J. Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2000. La Salud Los Adultos 2000, 2, 30–49. [Google Scholar]
- Olaiz-Fernández, G.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Rojas, R.; Villalpando-Hernández, S.; Hernández-Avila, M.; Sepúlveda-Amor, J. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2006; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública: Cuernavaca, México, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 80–105. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Ávila, M.; Gutiérrez, J.P.; Reynoso-Noverón, N. Diabetes mellitus en México. El estado de la epidemia. Salud Publica Mex. 2013, 55, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Basto-Abreu, A.; López-Olmedo, N.; Rojas-Martínez, R.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; de la Cruz-Góngora, V.; Rivera-Dommarco, J.; Shamah-Levy, T.; Romero-Martínez, M.; Barquera, S.; Villalpando, S.; et al. Prevalence of diabetes and glycemic control in Mexico: National results from 2018 and 2020. Salud Publica Mex. 2021, 63, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davidson, K.W.; Barry, M.J.; Mangione, C.M.; Cabana, M.; Caughey, A.B.; Davis, E.M.; Donahue, K.E.; Doubeni, C.A.; Krist, A.H.; Kubik, M.; et al. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2021, 326, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulet, M.I.; Iriarte, M.M. Epigenetic Changes in DNA Methylation and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis. Nutr. Lifestyle Neurol. Autoimmune Dis. Mult. Scler. 2017, 32, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bansal, A.; Pinney, S.E. DNA methylation and its role in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Pediatr. Diabetes 2017, 18, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wasko, M.C.M.; Hubert, H.B.; Lingala, V.B.; Elliott, J.R.; Luggen, M.E.; Fries, J.F.; Ward, M.M. Risk of diabetes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking hydroxychloroquine: Reply [5]. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2007, 298, 2369–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deaton, A.M.; Bird, A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes. Dev. 2011, 25, 1010–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elliott, H.R.; Shihab, H.A.; Lockett, G.A.; Holloway, J.W.; McRae, A.F.; Smith, G.D.; Ring, S.M.; Gaunt, T.R.; Relton, C.L. Role of DNA methylation in type 2 diabetes etiology: Using genotype as a causal anchor. Diabetes 2017, 66, 1713–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hall, E.; Dekker Nitert, M.; Volkov, P.; Malmgren, S.; Mulder, H.; Bacos, K.; Ling, C. The effects of high glucose exposure on global gene expression and DNA methylation in human pancreatic islets. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2018, 472, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinzón-Cortés, J.A.; Perna-Chaux, A.; Rojas-Villamizar, N.S.; Díaz-Basabe, A.; Polanía-Villanueva, D.C.; Jácome, M.F.; Mendivil, C.O.; Groot, H.; López-Segura, V. Effect of diabetes status and hyperglycemia on global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation. Endocr. Connect. 2017, 6, 708–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stylianou, E. Epigenetics of chronic inflammatory diseases. J. Inflamm. Res. 2019, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cowen, N.; Bhatnagar, A. The potential role of activating the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in the treatment of hyperphagic obesity. Genes 2020, 11, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuroda, A.; Rauch, T.A.; Todorov, I.; Ku, H.T.; Al-Abdullah, I.H.; Kandeel, F.; Mullen, Y.; Pfeifer, G.; Ferreri, K. Insulin gene expression is regulated by DNA methylation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, 6953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.T.; Dayeh, T.A.; Kirkpatrick, C.L.; Taneera, J.; Kumar, R.; Groop, L.; Wollheim, C.B.; Nitert, M.D.; Ling, C. Insulin promoter DNA methylation correlates negatively with insulin gene expression and positively with HbA1c levels in human pancreatic islets. Diabetologia 2011, 54, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gutiérrez-Rodelo, C.; Roura-Guiberna, A.; Olivares-Reyes, J.A. Mecanismos moleculares de la resistencia a la insulina: Una actualización. Gac. Med. Mex. 2017, 153, 214–228. [Google Scholar]
- Akcan, T.; Alam, T.; Sollinger, H.W. Insulin Gene Therapy for Treating Type I Diabetes Mellitus: History, Progress and Future Challenges. J. Diabetes Res. Ther. 2020, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Madrigal, L.; Sangronis, E. La inulina y derivados como ingredientes claves en alimentos funcionales. Arch. Latinoam Nutr. 2007, 57, 387–396. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-González, S.O.; Bricio-Ramírez, R.I.; Ramos-Zavala, M.G. Effect of Inulin from Agave tequilana Weber Blue Variety on the Metabolic Profile of Overweight and Obese Dyslipidemic Patients. J. Clin. Trials 2016, 6, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Yu, H.; Xiao, X.; Hu, L.; Xin, F.; Yu, X. Inulin-type fructan improves diabetic phenotype and gut microbiota profiles in rats. PeerJ 2018, 2018, e4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delzenne, N.M.; Cani, P.D.; Neyrinck, A.M. Modulation of glucagon-like peptide 1 and energy metabolism by inulin and oligofructose: Experimental data. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2547–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Liu, X.; Yang, Q.; He, Z.; Yao, S. Efficacy and safety of inulin supplementation for functional constipation: A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2021, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coussement, P.A.A. Nutritional and health benefits of inulin and oligofructose inulin and oligofructose: Safe intakes and legal status 1. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 1412–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Janssen, I.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Ross, R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: Evidence in support of current national institutes of health guidelines. Arch. Intern. Med. 2002, 162, 2074–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez Lizaur, A. Sistema Mexicano de Alimentos. 2021. 4a ed. 25–80. Available online: https://fisiologia.facmed.unam.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2-Valoraci%C3%B3n-nutricional-Anexos.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Lahiri, D.K.; Numberger, J.I. A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies. Nucleic. Acids Res. 1991, 19, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed.; Novo Nordisk, Pfizer-MSD Alliance and Sanofi: Bagsværd, Denmark, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Darsini, D.; Hamidah, H.; Notobroto, H.B.; Cahyono, E.A. Health risks associated with high waist circumference: A systematic review. J. Public Health Res. 2020, 9, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Medina, M.S. Overview of the overweight and obesity epidemic in Mexico Panorama de la epidemia de sobrepeso y obesidad en México. Mex. J. Med. Res. ICSa Biannu. Publ. 2020, 8, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Mercado, A.I.; Plaza-Diaz, J. Dietary Polysaccharides as Modulators of the Gut Microbiota Ecosystem: An Update on Their Impact on Health. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, N.; Li, L.; Ng, J.K.-C.; Li, P.K.-T. The Potential Benefits and Controversies of Probiotics Use in Patients at Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Xiao, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, M.; Yu, M.; Ping, F.; Wang, T.; Wang, X. Maternal Inulin Supplementation Alters Hepatic DNA Methylation Profile and Improves Glucose Metabolism in Offspring Mice. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dick, K.J.; Nelson, C.P.; Tsaprouni, L.; Sandling, J.K.; Aïssi, D.; Wahl, S.; Meduri, E.; Morange, P.E.; Gagnon, F.; Grallert, H.; et al. DNA methylation and body-mass index: A genome-wide analysis. Lancet 2014, 383, 1990–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, S.; Wong, E.M.; Bui, M.; Nguyen, T.L.; Joo, J.E.; Stone, J.; Dite, G.S.; Dugué, P.A.; Milne, R.L.; Giles, G.G.; et al. Inference about causation between body mass index and DNA methylation in blood from a twin family study. Int. J. Obes. 2019, 43, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walaszczyk, E.; Luijten, M.; Spijkerman, A.M.W.; Bonder, M.J.; Lutgers, H.L.; Snieder, H.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.R.; van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J.V. DNA methylation markers associated with type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose and HbA1c levels: A systematic review and replication in a case–control sample of the Lifelines study. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.A.H.; Ansari, S.A.; Mensah-Brown, E.P.K.; Emerald, B.S. The role of DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Epigenetics 2020, 12, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhutani, N.; Burns, D.M.; Blau, H.M. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 2011, 146, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yip, L.; Fuhlbrigge, R.; Alkhataybeh, R.; Fathman, C.G. Gene Expression Analysis of the Pre-Diabetic Pancreas to Identify Pathogenic Mechanisms and Biomarkers of Type 1 Diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 609271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaimala, S.; Kumar, C.A.; Allouh, M.Z.; Ansari, S.A.; Emerald, B.S. Epigenetic modifications in pancreas development, diabetes, and therapeutics. Med. Res. Rev. 2022, 42, 1343–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Otterdijk, S.D.; Binder, A.M.; Szarc Vel Szic, K.; Schwald, J.; Michels, K.B. DNA methylation of candidate genes in peripheral blood from patients with type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 180955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bacos, K.; Gillberg, L.; Volkov, P.; Olsson, A.H.; Hansen, T.; Pedersen, O.; Gjesing, A.P.; Eiberg, H.; Tuomi, T.; Almgren, P.; et al. Blood-based biomarkers of age-associated epigenetic changes in human islets associate with insulin secretion and diabetes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Qiu, X.; Wen, Q.; Liu, M.; Chen, Q. Blood DNA methylation and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e20530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makris, K.; Spanou, L. Is there a relationship between mean blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin? J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2011, 5, 1572–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Characteristics of study population before and after agave inulin intervention.
| Parameters | Before | After | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Men | 23 (34.4%) | - |
| Women | 44 (65.7%) | - | |
| Age (years) X ± ST | 54.4 ± 10.2 | - | |
| Metabolic control parameters | |||
| Weight (kg) | 73.8 ± 13.6 | 72.5 ± 14.3 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.4 ± 04.29 | 29.8± 04.6 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 100.3 ± 10.1 | 99.5 ± 10.2 | 0.001 |
| Fat mass (%) | 35.2 ± 07.3 | 35.1 ± 07.6 | 0.966 |
| Muscle mass (%) | 44.5 ± 09.0 | 43.9 ± 08.9 | 0.020 |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) | 164.5 ± 84.6 | 144.7 ± 57.6 | 0.013 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 221.3 ± 196.0 | 171 ± 101.0 | 0.008 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 202.7 ± 47.9 | 194.5 ± 47.9 | 0.120 |
| c-LDL (mg/dL) | 113.6 ± 39.26 | 115.3 ± 38.9 | 0.695 |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 04.9 ± 02.5 | 04.6 ± 01.4 | 0.372 |
| Dietary evaluation | |||
| Energy cal | 1668 ± 1074 | 1613 ± 1331 | 0.792 |
| Proteins | 70.42 ± 66.22 | 60.50 ± 19.92 | 0.242 |
| Lipids | 61.20 ± 68.6 | 50.14 ± 28.01 | 0.224 |
| Carbohydrates | 209 ± 93.2 | 194 ± 82.2 | 0.320 |
| Fiber | 19.3 ± 9.60 | 16.9 ± 8.2 | 0.129 |
BMI = body mass index; c-LDL = LDL cholesterol.
Table 2.
Methylation status of the INS and IRS1 genes before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
Table 2.
Methylation status of the INS and IRS1 genes before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
| Status | Before | After | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | p | |
| INS | |||||
| Methylated | 51 | 76.1 | 35 | 52.2 | 0.0001 |
| Hemimethylated | 16 | 23.8 | 32 | 47.7 | |
| IRS1 | |||||
| Hemimethylated | 15 | 22.3 | 13 | 19.4 | 0.79 |
| Unmethylated | 52 | 77.6 | 54 | 80.6 | |
Table 3.
Parameters recommended for metabolic control before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
Table 3.
Parameters recommended for metabolic control before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
| Parameters | Before | After | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | # | % | % | ||
| Recommended | 0 | 0 | 13 | 19.4 | |
| Not recommended | 67 | 100 | 54 | 80.5 | -- |
| Abdominal circumference | |||||
| Recommended | 17 | 25.4 | 18 | 26.9 | 1 |
| Not recommended | 50 | 74.6 | 49 | 73.1 | |
| Fat mass | |||||
| Recommended | 12 | 17.9 | 15 | 22.4 | 0.37 |
| Not recommended | 55 | 82.1 | 52 | 77.6 | |
| Muscle mass | |||||
| Recommended | 67 | 100 | 66 | 98.5 | -- |
| Not recommended | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.5 | |
| Fasting Glucose | |||||
| Recommended | 30 | 44.8 | 35 | 52.2 | 0.30 |
| Not recommended | 37 | 55.2 | 32 | 47.8 | |
| Triglycerides | |||||
| Recommended | 32 | 47.8 | 32 | 47.8 | 1 |
| Not recommended | 35 | 52.2 | 35 | 52.2 | |
| Cholesterol | |||||
| Recommended | 34 | 50.7 | 40 | 59.7 | 0.28 |
| Not recommended | 33 | 49.3 | 27 | 40.3 | |
| c-LDL | |||||
| Recommended | 24 | 35.8 | 20 | 29.9 | 0.38 |
| Not recommended | 43 | 64.2 | 47 | 70.1 | |
| Uric acid | |||||
| Recommended | 52 | 77.6 | 36 | 53.7 | |
| Not recommended | 15 | 22.4 | 31 | 46.3 | 0.004 |
BMI = body mass index; c-LDL = LDL cholesterol.
Table 4.
Recommended parameters of metabolic control and methylated status of the INS and IRS1 genes before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
Table 4.
Recommended parameters of metabolic control and methylated status of the INS and IRS1 genes before and after inulin intervention in T2DM patients.
| Parameters | Methylated INS | Hemimethylated INS | Unmethylated IRS1 | Hemimethylated IRS1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | p | Before | After | p | Before | After | p | Before | After | p | |
| BMI | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| Not recommended | 51 | 28 | - | 16 | 26 | - | 67 | 42 | - | 67 | 12 | - |
| Waist circumference | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 15 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 13 | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Not recommended | 36 | 24 | 1 | 14 | 25 | 0.69 | 40 | 41 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 1 |
| Fat mass | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 9 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 5 | 3 | ||||
| Not recommended | 42 | 26 | 0.37 | 13 | 26 | 1 | 45 | 42 | 0.28 | 10 | 10 | 0.63 |
| Muscle mass | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 51 | 34 | 16 | 32 | 52 | 54 | 15 | 12 | ||||
| Not recommended | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | - | 52 | 0 | - | 15 | 1 | 0.01 |
| Fasting Glucose | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 27 | 6 | 8 | ||||
| Not recommended | 29 | 15 | 0.31 | 8 | 17 | 1 | 28 | 27 | 0.60 | 9 | 5 | 0.41 |
| Triglycerides | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 23 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 27 | 26 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| Not recommended | 28 | 18 | 0.62 | 7 | 17 | 0.76 | 25 | 28 | 0.76 | 10 | 7 | 0.68 |
| Cholesterol | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 25 | 20 | 9 | 20 | 27 | 33 | 7 | 7 | ||||
| Not recommended | 26 | 15 | 0.48 | 7 | 12 | 0.75 | 25 | 21 | 0.46 | 8 | 6 | 1 |
| c-LDL | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 21 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 5 | 3 | ||||
| Not recommended | 30 | 26 | 0.06 | 13 | 21 | 0.32 | 33 | 37 | 0.71 | 10 | 10 | 0.65 |
| Uric acid | ||||||||||||
| Recommended | 40 | 15 | 12 | 21 | 41 | 29 | 11 | 7 | ||||
| Not recommended | 11 | 20 | 0.0012 | 4 | 11 | 0.74 | 11 | 25 | 0.007 | 4 | 6 | 0.40 |
BMI = body mass index; c-LDL = LDL cholesterol.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Martínez-Ramírez, O.C.; Salazar-Piña, A.; Cerón-Ramírez, X.; Rubio-Lightbourn, J.; Torres-Romero, F.; Casas-Avila, L.; Castro-Hernández, C. Effect of Inulin Intervention on Metabolic Control and Methylation of INS and IRS1 Genes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14235195
AMA Style
Martínez-Ramírez OC, Salazar-Piña A, Cerón-Ramírez X, Rubio-Lightbourn J, Torres-Romero F, Casas-Avila L, Castro-Hernández C. Effect of Inulin Intervention on Metabolic Control and Methylation of INS and IRS1 Genes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients. 2022; 14(23):5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14235195
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartínez-Ramírez, Ollin Celeste, Azucena Salazar-Piña, Ximena Cerón-Ramírez, Julieta Rubio-Lightbourn, Fernando Torres-Romero, Leonora Casas-Avila, and Clementina Castro-Hernández. 2022. "Effect of Inulin Intervention on Metabolic Control and Methylation of INS and IRS1 Genes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus" Nutrients 14, no. 23: 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14235195
APA StyleMartínez-Ramírez, O. C., Salazar-Piña, A., Cerón-Ramírez, X., Rubio-Lightbourn, J., Torres-Romero, F., Casas-Avila, L., & Castro-Hernández, C. (2022). Effect of Inulin Intervention on Metabolic Control and Methylation of INS and IRS1 Genes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nutrients, 14(23), 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14235195
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
