Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
NutrientsNutrients
  • Review
  • Open Access

31 August 2021

Phenol Biological Metabolites as Food Intake Biomarkers, a Pending Signature for a Complete Understanding of the Beneficial Effects of the Mediterranean Diet

and
1
Cátedra de Fisicoquímica, Departamento de Química Analítica y Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina
2
CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Bioquímica y Medicina Molecular (IBIMOL), Buenos Aires C1113AAD, Argentina
3
Instituto de Ciencias de La Vid y del Vino (ICVV), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Gobierno de La Rioja, Universidad de La Rioja, 26007 Logroño, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Micronutrients and Human Health

Abstract

The Mediterranean diet (MD) has become a dietary pattern of reference due to its preventive effects against chronic diseases, especially relevant in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Establishing an objective tool to determine the degree of adherence to the MD is a pending task and deserves consideration. The central axis that distinguishes the MD from other dietary patterns is the choice and modality of food consumption. Identification of intake biomarkers of commonly consumed foods is a key strategy for estimating the degree of adherence to the MD and understanding the protective mechanisms that lead to a positive impact on health. Throughout this review we propose potential candidates to be validated as MD adherence biomarkers, with particular focus on the metabolites derived from the phenolic compounds that are associated with the consumption of typical Mediterranean plant foods. Certain phenolic metabolites are good indicators of the intake of specific foods, but others denote the intake of a wide-range of foods. For this, it is important to emphasise the need to increase the number of dietary interventions with specific foods in order to validate the biomarkers of MD adherence. Moreover, the identification and quantification of food phenolic intake biomarkers encouraging scientific research focuses on the study of the biological mechanisms in which polyphenols are involved.

1. Introduction

1.1. Food Intake Biomarkers

The term “biomarker” is understood by the Food and Drug Administration [1] (www.fda.gov; accessed on 20 May 2020) as “a defined characteristic that is measured as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or responses to an exposure or intervention, including therapeutic interventions. Molecular, histologic, radiographic, or physiologic characteristics are types of biomarkers”. The choice of a particular biomarker will be determined according to the aim of the study and its suitability will be reflected in its susceptibility to change. In this review we describe a selective group of food polyphenols and their biological metabolites identified in biofluids (urine, plasma and faeces) for the purpose of considering them as potential biomarkers of adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD). For this purpose, the study is restricted to the most representative plant foods of the MD considering their frequency of consumption and seasonality.
Food is a complex matrix in which a broad and diverse group of compounds are present in different proportions. Beyond a nutritional need, humans also eat for pleasure. Therefore, they are constantly exposed to diverse types of foods and, consequently, to their components. A food intake biomarker is a molecule that derives from a specific food component (macro- or micro-nutrient) and its occurrence in biofluids is a direct indicator of the degree of exposition (intake) to a particular food [2,3]. Food biomarkers represent the chemical forms in which the original compounds are present in the circulation and reach the target organs or tissues where they carry out the expected metabolic functions [4]. Thus, establishing a more accurate association between the characteristics of a diet and its impact on health is a robust and objective perspective. In addition, the use of suitable intake biomarkers for a specific food also contributes to establishing the degree of compliance in dietary intervention studies.

1.2. Food Polyphenols

Most food components are essential for life. Others, although dispensable, accomplish body functions related with protective effects on health. Due to this property, these types of substances are called “bioactive compounds”. Among them, polyphenols have gained special scientific interest. Polyphenols are secondary metabolites of plants that are classified into flavonoids and non-flavonoids. In turn, flavonoids are subdivided into flavan-3-ols, anthocyanins, flavonols, flavanones and isoflavones. The non-flavonoids include phenolic structures with diverse chemical characteristics such as phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids), stilbenes, phenolic alcohols, and non-hydrolysable and hydrolysable tannins [5].
More than 500 different polyphenols with a heterogeneous pattern of distribution have been described in food [5]. On the one hand, some phenolic compounds are found in a huge variety of foods whereas others are characteristic of a reduced group of foods. In addition, the circulating biological metabolites are not necessarily the same as the polyphenols present in food since the latter undergo different metabolic modifications once absorbed. In consequence, a full knowledge of their metabolism is required to understand the mechanisms of polyphenols in the prevention of chronic diseases.

1.3. Polyphenol Metabolome

The study of the metabolic transformation that polyphenols undergo in the human body due to the activity of endogenous and exogenous enzymes is called metabolomics [6,7]. As result, a complete description of their circulating forms and, therefore, how phenol metabolites are present in organs and target tissues, and the form they are excreted is possible [6,8,9].
After ingestion of food, polyphenols must necessarily cross several biological barriers before reaching the target organ or tissues or being excreted. Digestion in the upper part of the digestive tube includes oral, gastric and intestinal steps in which endogenous enzymes participate. The small intestine is where the major absorption takes place and, therefore, the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of the original compounds are defined [10]. Once absorbed, phenolic compounds undergo phase I and II metabolism in the intestine and liver leading to the generation of a complex combination of different patterns of sulphated, glucuronidated and methylated conjugated metabolites [11,12,13]. Most of these metabolites are excreted in urine and a fraction is recirculated into the colon where they are exposed to further catabolism by gut microbiotaHowever, it is documented that most food polyphenols are poorly absorbed in the small intestine and a relevant percentage reaches the colon. In the gut, parent compounds are modified by microbial metabolism, including dehydroxylation, demethylation, ring fission and decarboxylation, among others [10,14,15]. In addition, colonic metabolites can be absorbed by colonocytes and reach organs and tissues and are excreted via urine [12].
Thus, the original compounds in foods are transformed in the human body into related compounds with similar chemical structures but not necessarily the same activity. These diverse modifications of parent compounds into related phase I and II metabolites constitute the so-called “food metabolome” [16,17]. The identification of these metabolites in biofluids has been associated with the exposure to a particular food while their quantification indicates the degree of exposure [4]. The kinetics of intake biomarkers, including postprandial absorption, metabolism and half-life of circulating compounds, is normally studied after an acute intake of a polyphenol-rich food or extract [4,11,18]. Medium- and long-term dietetic interventions, as well as epidemiological studies, are designed to determine the “steady state” of phenolic metabolites due to the sustained intake of one or more phenolic-rich foods [3]. As biochemical mechanisms of polyphenols are linked to disease prevention, there is a need to know the cycle of polyphenols in the body clearly in order to understand their biological relevance.

2. Phenol Metabolites as Biomarkers of Adherence to Mediterranean Diet: Is It Possible?

According with the Mediterranean Diet Foundation [19], “The MD is a valuable cultural heritage that is much more than a dietary pattern. It encompasses a balanced lifestyle including recipes, cooking methods, celebrations, particular habits, local products and cultural habits”. The ten principles of the MD are: (1) use olive oil as your main fat source; (2) eat plenty of plant products such as fruits, vegetables, legumes and nuts; (3) bread and other grain products (pasta, rice, and whole grains) should be a part of the everyday diet; (4) fresh and locally low-processed products are preferred; (5) consume dairy products on a daily basis, mainly yogurt and cheese; (6) red meat should be consumed in moderation and if possible as a part of stews and other recipes; (7) consume fish abundantly and eggs in moderation; (8) fresh fruit should be your everyday dessert and, sweets, cakes and dairy desserts should be consumed only on occasion; (9) water I preferred over other beverages and wine is consumed in moderation at meal times; (10) be physically active every day. The new pyramid imitates previous models: those foods at the base should support the diet whereas those at the top should be eaten in moderate/low amounts. It is not just about prioritizing some food groups over others, but also paying attention to the selection, way of cooking and eating. According to this model, plant products represent the core of the daily intake, contributing with large variety of fibres and essential micronutrients. Moreover, social and cultural elements characteristic of the Mediterranean way of life have been incorporated into the graphic design [19].
The MD can be interpreted as a dynamic diet since there is a marked seasonal variability, particularly evident in the intake of fruit and vegetables. This trend in the consumption of seasonal products is associated with the high value that Mediterranean inhabitants attribute to local products [20]. The preference for fresh products is partly due to the proximity of the production zones for these high nutritional quality food products. This elevated quality is linked to their polyphenol content to which many authors have attributed the protective effects of the MD [21].
Is it possible to elaborate an agreed and unified list of biomarkers associated with MD consumption? An ideal biomarker of adherence to MD should respond to the intake of traditional polyphenol-rich plant-foods. So, we propose polyphenols and their related metabolites as biomarkers for adherence to MD. This choice takes into consideration two main aspects: (i) the changes observed in the phenolic metabolome of biofluids after the intake of phenol-rich foods typical of the MD, and (ii) the presence in biofluids of phenol biological metabolites could be associated with modifications in the metabolic functions or activities in the body whose effects are closely related to protection against chronic diseases. Based on these criteria, the main objective of this review was carried out a descriptive bibliometric analysis on phenolic biological metabolites detected in biofluids associated with the intake of the most representative foods of the Mediterranean diet. For this, we proposed to analyse the available research activity between 2000 and 2020 dedicated to the identification of phenolic metabolites in human biofluids. A systematic search was done in PubMed database and scientific literature was selected and evaluated for their inclusion in this review. Inclusion criteria used to discriminate most relevant studies were authors productivity, relevance of authors in the field, most productive countries, relevance of food included, most relevant keywords, methodology used to identify phenolic metabolites and human diet intervention studies. We have delimited the period of published data between 2000 and 2020 coinciding with the more productive data generation, the increased interest of various research groups in identify phenolic metabolites and a great advance in technological development in the field of analytical chemistry. Exceptionality, and due to the lack of more current data, some papers published before 2000 were included.
Reliable dietary assessment methods are crucial when attempting to understand the links between diet and chronic disease. Different methods have been used in nutritional epidemiology to estimate food intake including 24 h recalls, weighted food diaries and food frequency questionnaires [22]. However, further progress is required to overcome certain issues such as the effect of subjectivity, correct incorporation of subpopulations and translation into public health messages. For this proposal, nutritional habits would include the specification of different items, such as portion size, frequency of consumption, food composition and daily variations in intake, between others. However, documenting all these individual parameters in large epidemiological studies is not always feasible. Thus, errors in the assessment of the food consumed are to be expected, and an objective and independent validation against quantitatively measurable parameters is needed.
Recently, ‘Systems Epidemiology’ has combined traditional epidemiological methods with such modern high-throughput technologies as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to enhance biological understanding of metabolic pathways in humans [7]. Nutritional epidemiological studies are traditionally based on self-reported dietary assessment methods (24 h recall, food-frequency questionnaires). Despite the extensive and approved use of these tools, they have well-known limitations that do not allow further advances in the human nutrition field, because foods are mixtures of known and unknown constituents and objective biomarkers do not exist for everyone [16]. The use of dietary biomarkers in nutritional epidemiological studies may better capture exposure and improve the level at which diet-disease associations can be established and explored [23]. Over the past decade, nutritional epidemiology has incorporated metabolomics as a promising technique to measure the metabolic products of foods and might therefore identify objective dietary biomarkers which reflect true food exposure.
Two different fractions of the human metabolome are influenced by the diet: the endogenous metabolome and the food metabolome [17]. The former includes all metabolites from the host, which in turn might be modulated by the diet affecting human health. The latter has been defined as the sum of all metabolites directly derived from the digestion of foods, their absorption in the gut, and their biotransformation by the host tissues and the intestinal microbiota [24].
Although some biomarkers of key plant-foods in the MD, such as vegetables, fruits, virgin olive oil or red wine, have been individually described in different human interventional studies, the food metabolome of the MD has yet to be defined. Thereby, the integration of metabolic profiling with reported dietary assessment can be combined to discover biomarkers of food exposure and can help disentangle the molecular mechanisms by which MD affects health and disease.

5. Perspectives

Everything presented in this review leads us to deduce that, although it is difficult to correlate a specific phenol biological metabolite with the intake of a particular food, a selected group of these could be used as indicators of adherence to the MD. Table 7 summarizes the main phenol biological metabolites detected in the studies included in this review. Although each food or group of foods has its own specific phenolic composition, this particular characteristic is not usually reflected in the phenolic metabolome in biofluids. This is a consequence of the fast and intense metabolism that polyphenols undergo in the body. The pharmacokinetic behavior of phenolic metabolites in biofluids (plasma and urine) after an acute intake reveals two easily distinguished nutrikinetic patterns. The first kinetic corresponds to hepatic phase-II metabolism resulting in the presence of phase-II metabolites circulating in the plasma within 4 h of food ingestion, which are rapidly cleared by urinary excretion. These phase-II metabolites correspond to the original polyphenols present in the food which are absorbed in the upper intestinal tract (stomach and the different sections of the small intestine). The structural characteristics of these metabolites correspond to sulphate, glucuronide or methyl conjugates of the native phenols present in the food. The most important limitation for selecting these phenol phase-II metabolites as MD intake biomarkers is related to their short lifespan in circulation. This is explained by the character of xenobiotics which are rapidly metabolized and excreted in the urine, normally by 8 h post intake. Nevertheless, it is possible that the continuous exposure to a specific food through the diet, such as virgin olive oil or other non-seasonal plant-foods, could produce a “steady state”, maintaining a constant concentration in biofluids. There are some exceptions as in the case of anthocyanins, which have been detected as native glycosides in biofluids, the same form in which they are found in red grapes and red wine (Table 7). Similarly, free hydroxytyrosol has been detected after the intake of virgin olive oil or red wine. These native forms of phenol compounds in the foods could be good intake biomarkers of continuous exposure to a specific food in the context of the MD.
Table 7. Summary of the phenol biological metabolites proposed as a useful tool for the assessment of Mediterranean Diet adherence.
The second pharmacokinetic behaviour of phenol metabolites in biofluids is dominated by the appearance of colonic catabolites originated as a consequence of microbial fermentation in the large intestine. The substrates of this colonic metabolism are food phenols not absorbed during gastrointestinal digestion, in addition to those from enterohepatic recirculation (phase-II metabolites). These colonic metabolites are common to most MD foods and are represented by such simple phenolic acids as phenylacetic, phenylpropionic, benzoic acids and similar phenolic structures (Table 7). Their concentration in plasma produces a second peak (between 4 and 8 h after food intake) observed in many studies in which microbial metabolism was evaluated. The concentration of these circulating metabolites is usually higher than that corresponding to the first and fast phase-II metabolism. In addition to these simple and common phenolic acids, different microbial metabolites have been described for specific food phenolic compounds. Specifically, urolithins and phenyl-γ-valerolactones have been identified as microbial metabolites of ellagitannins and procyanidins after the intake of nuts or pomegranate products, between others (Table 7). These metabolites have a longer half-life, as was observed for phenolic acids. For example, the clearance of urolithins, which have been detected in urine 72 h after ingestion of ellagic acid derivatives, is slower than that of phase-II phenol metabolites.
Metabolites of mixed origin: indicates metabolites form endogenous (phase II metabolites) and those generated by gut microbiota. However, there are important challenges to be addressed. A major one is the need to find discriminated phenolic metabolites directly associated with the intake of a particular food or group of foods in order to offer solid candidates to be used as biomarkers of adherence to the MD. However, the intake of some foods is sporadic, normally because they are markedly seasonal, as is the case of some fruits or vegetables. Therefore, it should be adequate to consider a range biomarkers of food intake according to the period of the year when biofluids are analysed. It is evident that the same phenolic metabolite can be considered as intake biomarker of more than one MD food. On the other hand, other phenolic metabolites are exclusive to a one particular or a reduced number of foods. In this sense, short-term phenolic metabolites indicate recent consumption and can be used to validate some dietary assessment methods, such as 24 h recall of FFQ. Another challenge to highlight is the importance of unifying analytical methods and laboratory procedures to allow more consistence in the comparisons and data collected by different studies. So, a standardization of laboratory procedures including analytical instruments and protocols, sample collection and treatment, quantification and identification of phenolic compounds and their metabolites and homogeneity in the expression of results is necessary. One of the weak points is the lack of available commercial standards for identifying and quantifying phenolic biological metabolites. This is of special importance in the quantification of phase-II metabolites and specific colonic metabolites, such as urolithins or phenyl-γ-valerolactones.
Overall, three main groups of phenol biological metabolites can be proposed as good candidates for MD intake biomarkers. Firstly, there are the most food-specific phase-II metabolites with the limitation of their fast body clearance and the lack of standards for precise quantification in biofluids. Secondly, there are the colonic phenol metabolites represented by the simple phenolic acids (phenylacetic, phenylpropionic, benzoic acids and similar structures) and which are common to different plant-foods in the MD, together with the specific urolithins and phenyl-γ-valerolactones. Third are the native forms of polyphenols, for example anthocyanins or hydroxytyrosol, resulting from the sustained intake of certain foods over the year. However, an unmanageable aspect for the selection of phenol colonic metabolites as biomarkers of MD intake is the inter-individual variability observed in most human studies. These qualitative and mainly quantitative differences are mainly related to the variability in the microbiota composition defined as “metabotype” that result in differences in the phenol colonic catabolism.
The data presented in this review indicates that, instead of a single intake biomarker, a good proposal could be the study of the phenol metabolome in different populations of the Mediterranean area in order to link the concentration of specific phenol metabolites in biofluids, preferably in fasting urine, with the level of adherence to the MD (from low to high) based on 24 h recall of Food Frequency Questioners (FFQ).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.I.M. and M.-J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.I.M. and M.-J.M.; writing—review and editing, J.I.M. and M.-J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

J.I.M. was supported by a grant from the CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas).

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Available online: https://www.fda.gov (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  2. Verhagen, H.; Coolen, S.; Duchateau, G.; Hamer, M.; Kyle, J.; Rechner, A. Assessment of the efficacy of functional food ingredients—introducing the concept “kinetics of biomarkers”. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2004, 551, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zamora-Ros, R.; Urpí-Sardà, M.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Estruch, R.; Vázquez-Agell, M.; Serrano-Martínez, M.; Jaeger, W.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Diagnostic Performance of Urinary Resveratrol Metabolites as a Biomarker of Moderate Wine Consumption. Clin. Chem. 2006, 52, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rubió, L.; Valls, R.-M.; Macià, A.; Pedret, A.; Giralt, M.; Romero, M.-P.; de la Torre, R.; Covas, M.-I.; Solà, R.; Motilva, M.-J. Impact of olive oil phenolic concentration on human plasmatic phenolic metabolites. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2922–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Neveu, V.; Vos, F.; Scalbert, A. Systematic Analysis of the Content of 502 Polyphenols in 452 Foods and Beverages: An Application of the Phenol-Explorer Database. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 4959–4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Castello, F.; Costabile, G.; Bresciani, L.; Tassotti, M.; Naviglio, D.; Luongo, D.; Ciciola, P.; Vitale, M.; Vetrani, C.; Galaverna, G.; et al. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile of grape pomace phenolic compounds in humans. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 646, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Bhupathiraju, S.N.; Hu, F.B. Use of Metabolomics in Improving Assessment of Dietary Intake. Clin. Chem. 2018, 64, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. González-Sarrías, A.; Giménez-Bastida, J.A.; García-Conesa, M.T.; Gómez-Sánchez, M.B.; García-Talavera, N.V.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Sánchez-Álvarez, C.; Fontana-Compiano, L.O.; Morga-Egea, J.P.; Pastor-Quirante, F.A.; et al. Occurrence of urolithins, gut microbiota ellagic acid metabolites and proliferation markers expression response in the human prostate gland upon consumption of walnuts and pomegranate juice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yuste, S.; Ludwig, I.A.; Rubió, L.; Romero, M.-P.; Pedret, A.; Valls, R.M.; Solà, R.; Motilva, M.J.; Macià, A. In vivo biotransformation of (poly)phenols and anthocyanins of red-fleshed apple and identification of intake biomarkers. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 55, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mosele, J.I.; Macià, A.; Romero-Fabregat, M.-P.; Motilva, M.J.; Rubió, L. Application of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and colonic fermentation models to pomegranate products (juice, pulp and peel extract) to study the stability and catabolism of phenolic compounds. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, J.; Mitchell, A.E. Pharmacokinetics of Quercetin Absorption from Apples and Onions in Healthy Humans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3874–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martínez-Huélamo, M.; Vallverdu-Queralt, A.; Di Lecce, G.; Valderas-Martínez, P.; Tulipani, S.; Jáuregui, O.; Escribano-Ferrer, E.; Estruch, R.; Illan, M.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Bioavailability of tomato polyphenols is enhanced by processing and fat addition: Evidence from a randomized feeding trial. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 1578–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nakamura, T.; Murota, K.; Kumamoto, S.; Misumi, K.; Bando, N.; Ikushiro, S.; Takahashi, N.; Sekido, K.; Kato, Y.; Terao, J. Plasma metabolites of dietary flavonoids after combination meal consumption with onion and tofu in humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 58, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mosele, J.I.; Martín-Peláez, S.; Macià, A.; Farràs, M.; Valls, R.M.; Catalán, Ú.; Motilva, M.J. Faecal microbial metabolism of olive oil phenolic compounds: In vitro and in vivo approaches. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Caro, G.P.; Borges, G.; Ky, I.; Ribas, A.; Alan, C.; Del Rio, D.; Clifford, M.N.; Roberts, S.A.; Crozier, A. In vitro colonic catabolism of orange juice (poly)phenols. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cornelis, M.C.; Hu, F.B. Systems Epidemiology: A New Direction in Nutrition and Metabolic Disease Research. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2013, 2, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Scalbert, A.; Brennan, L.; Manach, C.; Andres-Lacueva, C.; Dragsted, L.O.; Draper, J.; Rappaport, S.M.; van der Hooft, J.J.; Wishart, D.S. The food metabolome: A window over dietary exposure. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 1286–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Martínez-Huélamo, M.; Tulipani, S.; Estruch, R.; Escribano, E.; Illán, M.; Corella, D.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. The tomato sauce making process affects the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of tomato phenolics: A pharmacokinetic study. Food Chem. 2015, 173, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Available online: https://dietamediterranea.com/en/fundacion (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  20. Dernini, S.; Berry, E.M.; Serra-Majem, L.; La Vecchia, C.; Capone, R.; Medina, F.X.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Belahsen, R.; Burlin-game, B.; Calabrese, G.; et al. On behalf of the Scientific Committee of the International Foundation of Mediterranean Diet. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 20, 1322–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ditano-Vázquez, P.; Torres-Peña, J.D.; Galeano-Valle, F.; Pérez-Caballero, A.I.; Demelo-Rodríguez, P.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; Katsiki, N.; Lista, F.J.D.; Alvarez-Sala-Walther, L.A. The Fluid Aspect of the Mediterranean Diet in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: The Role of Polyphenol Content in Moderate Consumption of Wine and Olive Oil. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. O’Sullivan, A.; Gibney, M.J.; Brennan, L. Dietary intake patterns are reflected in metabolomic profiles: Potential role in dietary assessment studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 93, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pallister, T.; Jennings, A.; Mohney, R.P.; Yarand, D.; Mangino, M.; Cassidy, A.; MacGregor, A.; Spector, T.D.; Menni, C. Characterizing Blood Metabolomics Profiles Associated with Self-Reported Food Intakes in Female Twins. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fardet, A.; Llorach, R.; Orsoni, A.; Martin, J.-F.; Pujos-Guillot, E.; Lapierre, C.; Scalbert, A. Metabolomics Provide New Insight on the Metabolism of Dietary Phytochemicals in Rats. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1282–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Azzini, E.; Bugianesi, R.; Romano, F.; Di Venere, D.; Miccadei, S.; Durazzo, A.; Foddai, M.S.; Catasta, G.; Linsalata, V.; Maiani, G. Absorption and metabolism of bioactive molecules after oral consumption of cooked edible heads of Cynara scolymus L. (cultivar Violetto di Provenza) in human subjects: A pilot study. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 97, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Negro, D.; Montesano, V.; Grieco, S.; Crupi, P.; Sarli, G.; De Lisi, A.; Sonnante, G. Polyphenol Compounds in Artichoke Plant Tissues and Varieties. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C244–C252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rechner, A.R.; Pannala, A.S.; Rice-Evans, C.A. Caffeic acid derivatives in artichoke extract are metabolised to phenolic acidsin vivo. Free Radic. Res. 2001, 35, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pepe, G.; Sommella, E.; Manfra, M.; De Nisco, M.; Tenore, G.C.; Scopa, A.; Sofo, A.; Marzocco, S.; Adesso, S.; Novellino, T.; et al. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity and fast UHPLC–DAD–IT-TOF profiling of polyphenolic compounds extracted from green lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.; var. Maravilla de Verano). Food Chem. 2015, 167, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, D.-E.; Shang, X.; Assefa, A.D.; Keum, Y.-S.; Saini, R.K. Metabolite profiling of green, green/red, and red lettuce cultivars: Variation in health beneficial compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Graefe, E.U.; Wittig, J.; Mueller, S.; Riethling, A.-K.; Uehleke, B.; Drewelow, B.; Pforte, H.; Jacobasch, G.; Derendorf, H.; Veit, M. Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Quercetin Glycosides in Humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001, 41, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mullen, W.; Edwards, C.A.; Crozier, A. Absorption, excretion and metabolite profiling of methyl-, glucuronyl-, glucosyl- and sulpho-conjugates of quercetin in human plasma and urine after ingestion of onions. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 96, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hong, Y.-J.; Mitchell, A.E. Metabolic Profiling of Flavonol Metabolites in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6794–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Passon, M.; Bühlmeier, J.; Zimmermann, B.F.; Stratmann, A.; Latz, S.; Stehle, P.; Galensa, R. Polyphenol Phase-II Metabolites are Detectable in Human Plasma after Ingestion of 13 C Labeled Spinach-a Pilot Intervention Trial in Young Healthy Adults. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1701003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Martínez-Huélamo, M.; Tulipani, S.; Jáuregui, O.; Valderas-Martinez, P.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Estruch, R.; Torrado, X.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Sensitive and Rapid UHPLC-MS/MS for the Analysis of Tomato Phenolics in Human Biological Samples. Molecules 2015, 20, 20409–20425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dinelli, G.; Carretero, A.S.; Di Silvestro, R.; Marotti, I.; Arraez-Roman, D.; Benedettelli, S.; Ghiselli, L.; Fernadez-Gutierrez, A. Profiles of phenolic compounds in modern and old common wheat varieties determined by liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 7670–7681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, Y.; Shurlknight, K.L.; Chen, X.; Sang, S. Identification and Pharmacokinetics of Novel Alkylresorcinol Metabolites in Human Urine, New Candidate Biomarkers for Whole-Grain Wheat and Rye Intake. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Wierzbicka, R.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Kamal-Eldin, A.; Landberg, R. Novel urinary alkylresorcinol metabolites as biomarkers of whole grain intake in free-living Swedish adults. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1700015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Vitaglione, P.; Mennella, I.; Ferracane, R.; Rivellese, A.A.; Giacco, R.; Ercolini, D.; Gibbons, S.; La Storia, A.; Gilbert, J.A.; Jonnalagadda, S.; et al. Whole-grain wheat consumption reduces inflammation in a randomized controlled trial on overweight and obese subjects with unhealthy dietary and lifestyle behaviors: Role of polyphenols bound to cereal dietary fiber. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. European Regulation EU 432/2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health. Off. J. Eur. Union 2012, 136, 1–40.
  40. Orsavova, J.; Misurcova, L.; Ambrozova, J.V.; Vicha, R.; Mlcek, J. Fatty Acids Composition of Vegetable Oils and Its Contribution to Dietary Energy Intake and Dependence of Cardiovascular Mortality on Dietary Intake of Fatty Acids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12871–12890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malheiro, R.; Rodrigues, N.; Pereira, J.A. Olive Oil Phenolic Composition as Affected by Geographic Origin, Olive Cultivar, and Cultivation Systems. In Olive and Olive Oil Bioactive Constituents; Boskou, D., Ed.; AOCS Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-63067-041-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to polyphenols in olive and maintenance of normal blood HDL cholesterol concentrations (ID 1639, further assessment) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Garcia-Villalba, R.; Carrasco-Pancorbo, A.; Nevedomskaya, E.; Mayboroda, O.A.; Deelder, A.M.; Carretero, A.S.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. Exploratory analysis of human urine by LC–ESI-TOF MS after high intake of olive oil: Understanding the metabolism of polyphenols. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rubió, L.; Farràs, M.; de La Torre, R.; Macià, A.; Romero-Fabregat, M.-P.; Valls, R.M.; Solà, R.; Farré, M.; Fitó, M.; Motilva, M.J. Metabolite profiling of olive oil and thyme phenols after a sustained intake of two phenol-enriched olive oils by humans: Identification of compliance markers. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Orozco-Solano, M.; Ferreiro-Vera, C.; Priego-Capote, F.; De Castro, M.D.L. Automated method for determination of olive oil phenols and metabolites in human plasma and application in intervention studies. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1258, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Silva, S.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Figueira, M.E.; Combet, E.; Mullen, W.; Bronze, M. High Resolution Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Secoiridoids and Metabolites as Biomarkers of Acute Olive Oil Intake-An Approach to Study Interindividual Variability in Humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 62, 1700065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. de la Torre-Carbot, K.; Chávez-Servín, J.L.; Jaúregui, O.; Castellote, A.I.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M.; Fitó, M.; Covas, M.-I.; Muñoz-Aguayo, D.; López-Sabater, M.C. Presence of virgin olive oil phenolic metabolites in human low density lipoprotein fraction: Determination by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 583, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fernández-Ávila, C.; Montes, R.; Castellote, A.I.; Chisaguano, A.M.; Fitó, M.; Covas, M.I.; Muñoz-Aguallo, D.; Nyyssönen, K.; Zunft, H.J.; López-Sabater, M.C. Fast determination of virgin olive oil phenolic metabolites in human high-density lipoproteins. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 29, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zamora-Ros, R.; Andres-Lacueva, C.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Berenguer, T.; Jakszyn, P.; Barricarte, A.; Ardanaz, E.; Amiano, P.; Dorronsoro, M.; Larrañaga, N.; et al. Estimation of Dietary Sources and Flavonoid Intake in a Spanish Adult Population (EPIC-Spain). J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bars-Cortina, D.; Macià, A.; Iglesias, I.; Romero, M.P.; Motilva, M.J. Phytochemical Profiles of New Red-Fleshed Apple Varieties Compared with Traditional and New White-Fleshed Varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1684–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kahle, K.; Kempf, M.; Schreier, P.; Scheppach, W.; Schrenk, D.; Kautenburger, T.; Hecker, D.; Huemmer, W.; Ackermann, M.; Richling, E. Intestinal transit and systemic metabolism of apple polyphenols. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011, 50, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Trošt, K.; Ulaszewska, M.M.; Stanstrup, J.; Albanese, D.; De Filippo, C.; Tuohy, K.M.; Natella, F.; Scaccini, C.; Mattivi, F. Host: Microbiome co-metabolic processing of dietary polyphenols—An acute, single blinded, cross-over study with different doses of apple polyphenols in healthy subjects. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 108–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Saenger, T.; Hübner, F.; Humpf, H.-U. Short-term biomarkers of apple consumption. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 61, 1600629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yuste, S.; Macià, A.; Ludwig, I.A.; Romero, M.-P.; Fernández-Castillejo, S.; Catalán, Ú.; Motilva, M.-J.; Rubió, L. Validation of Dried Blood Spot Cards to Determine Apple Phenolic Metabolites in Human Blood and Plasma After an Acute Intake of Red-Fleshed Apple Snack. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1800623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kolniak-Ostek, J.; Oszmiański, J. Characterization of phenolic compounds in different anatomical pear (Pyrus communis L.) parts by ultra-performance liquid chromatography photodiode detector-quadrupole/time of flight-mass spectrometry (UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS). Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 392, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gu, C.; Howell, K.; Dunshea, F.R.; Suleria, H.A.R. LC-ESI-QTOF/MS Characterisation of Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids in Polyphenol-Rich Fruits and Vegetables and Their Potential Antioxidant Activities. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Nieman, D.C.; Gillitt, N.D.; Sha, W.; Meaney, M.P.; John, C.; Pappan, K.L.; Kinchen, J. Metabolomics-Based Analysis of Banana and Pear Ingestion on Exercise Performance and Recovery. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 5367–5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manach, C.; Morand, C.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Bouteloup-Demange, C.; Rémésy, C. Bioavailability in humans of the flavanones hesperidin and narirutin after the ingestion of two doses of orange juice. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Pereira-Caro, G.; Borges, G.; Van Der Hooft, J.; Clifford, M.N.; Del Rio, D.; Lean, M.E.; Roberts, S.A.; Kellerhals, M.B.; Crozier, A. Orange juice (poly)phenols are highly bioavailable in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 1378–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pereira-Caro, G.; Ludwig, I.A.; Polyviou, T.; Malkova, D.; García, A.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Crozier, A. Identification of Plasma and Urinary Metabolites and Catabolites Derived from Orange Juice (Poly)phenols: Analysis by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 5724–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Mosele, J.I.; Gosalbes, M.-J.; Macià, A.; Rubió, L.; Castellanos, J.F.V.; Hernández, N.J.; Moya, A.; Latorre, A.; Motilva, M.-J. Effect of daily intake of pomegranate juice on fecal microbiota and feces metabolites from healthy volunteers. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1942–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Seeram, N.P.; Zhang, Y.; McKeever, R.; Henning, S.M.; Lee, R.-P.; Suchard, M.A.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Thames, G.; Zerlin, A.; et al. Pomegranate Juice and Extracts Provide Similar Levels of Plasma and Urinary Ellagitannin Metabolites in Human Subjects. J. Med. Food 2008, 11, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mertens-Talcott, S.U.; Jilma-Stohlawetz, P.; Rios, J.; Hingorani, L.; Derendorf, H. Absorption, Metabolism, and Antioxidant Effects of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Polyphenols after Ingestion of a Standardized Extract in Healthy Human Volunteers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8956–8961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nuñez-Sánchez, M.A.; Villalba, R.G.; Monedero-Saiz, T.; García-Talavera, N.V.; Gómez-Sánchez, M.B.; Sánchez-Álvarez, C.; García-Albert, A.M.; Rodríguez-Gil, F.J.; Ruiz-Marín, M.; Pastor-Quirante, F.A.; et al. Targeted metabolic profiling of pomegranate polyphenols and urolithins in plasma, urine and colon tissues from colorectal cancer patients. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 1199–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bub, A.; Watzl, B.; Heeb, D.; Rechkemmer, G.; Briviba, K. Malvidin-3-glucoside bioavailability in humans after ingestion of red wine, dealcoholized red wine and red grape juice. Eur. J. Nutr. 2001, 40, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Stalmach, A.; Edwards, C.; Wightman, J.; Crozier, A. Identification of (Poly)phenolic Compounds in Concord Grape Juice and Their Metabolites in Human Plasma and Urine after Juice Consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9512–9522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stalmach, A.; Edwards, C.; Wightman, J.; Crozier, A. Gastrointestinal stability and bioavailability of (poly)phenolic compounds following ingestion of Concord grape juice by humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Meng, X.; Maliakal, P.; Lu, H.; Lee, M.-J.; Yang, C.S. Urinary and Plasma Levels of Resveratrol and Quercetin in Humans, Mice, and Rats after Ingestion of Pure Compounds and Grape Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. PREDIMED Study Investigators. Alcohol consumption is associated with high concentrations of urinary hydroxytyrosol. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 1329–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Giusti, F.; Caprioli, G.; Ricciutelli, M.; Vittori, S.; Sagratini, G. Determination of fourteen polyphenols in pulses by high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and correlation study with antioxidant activity and colour. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Magalhães, S.C.; Taveira, M.; Cabrita, A.R.; Fonseca, A.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B. European marketable grain legume seeds: Further insight into phenolic compounds profiles. Food Chem. 2017, 215, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Caprioli, G.; Nzekoue, A.F.K.; Giusti, F.; Vittori, S.; Sagratini, G. Optimization of an extraction method for the simultaneous quantification of sixteen polyphenols in thirty-one pulse samples by using HPLC-MS/MS dynamic-MRM triple quadrupole. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nurmi, A.; Nurmi, T.; Mursu, J.; Hiltunen, R.; Voutilainen, S. Ingestion of Oregano Extract Increases Excretion of Urinary Phenolic Metabolites in Humans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 6916–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Slimestad, R.; Fossen, T.; Brede, C. Flavonoids and other phenolics in herbs commonly used in Norwegian commercial kitchens. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nielsen, S.E.; Young, J.F.; Daneshvar, B.; Lauridsen, S.T.; Knuthsen, P.; Sandström, B.; Dragsted, L.O. Effect of parsley (Petroselinum crispum) intake on urinary apigenin excretion, blood antioxidant enzymes and biomarkers for oxidative stress in human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 1999, 81, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Baba, S.; Osakabe, N.; Natsume, M.; Yasuda, A.; Muto, Y.; Hiyoshi, K.; Takano, H.; Yoshikawa, T.; Terao, J. Absorption, metabolism, degradation and urinary excretion of rosmarinic acid after intake of Perilla frutescens extract in humans. Eur. J. Nutr. 2005, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cortés-Martín, A.; Selma, M.V.; Espín, J.C.; García-Villalba, R. The Human Metabolism of Nuts Proanthocyanidins does not Reveal Urinary Metabolites Consistent with Distinctive Gut Microbiota Metabotypes. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1800819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tulipani, S.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; García-Villalba, R.; Rabassa, M.; López-Uriarte, P.; Bulló, M.; Jáuregui, O.; Tomás-Barberán, F.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Espín, J.C.; et al. Urolithins Are the Main Urinary Microbial-Derived Phenolic Metabolites Discriminating a Moderate Consumption of Nuts in Free-Living Subjects with Diagnosed Metabolic Syndrome. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8930–8940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mora-Cubillos, X.; Tulipani, S.; Garcia-Aloy, M.; Bulló, M.; Tinahones, F.J.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Plasma metabolomic biomarkers of mixed nuts exposure inversely correlate with severity of metabolic syndrome. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 2480–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Motilva, M.-J.; Macià, A.; Romero, M.-P.; Rubió, L.; Mercader, M.; González-Ferrero, C. Human bioavailability and metabolism of phenolic compounds from red wine enriched with free or nano-encapsulated phenolic extract. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Muñoz-González, I.; Jiménez-Girón, A.; Martín-Álvarez, P.J.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Profiling of Microbial-Derived Phenolic Metabolites in Human Feces after Moderate Red Wine Intake. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9470–9479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Caccetta, R.; Croft, K.D.; Beilin, L.J.; Puddey, I.B. Ingestion of red wine significantly increases plasma phenolic acid concentrations but does not acutely affect ex vivo lipoprotein oxidizability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Urpi-Sarda, M.; Boto-Ordóñez, M.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I.; Tulipani, S.; Corella, D.; Estruch, R.; Tinahones, F.J.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Phenolic and microbial-targeted metabolomics to discovering and evaluating wine intake biomarkers in human urine and plasma. Electrophoresis 2015, 36, 2259–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Zamora-Ros, R.; Achaintre, D.; Rothwell, J.; Rinaldi, S.; Assi, N.; Ferrari, P.; Leitzmann, M.; Boutron-Ruault, M.-C.; Fagherazzi, G.; Auffret, A.; et al. Urinary excretions of 34 dietary polyphenols and their associations with lifestyle factors in the EPIC cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Esteban-Fernández, A.; Ibañez, C.; Simo, C.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. An Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Metabolomic Approach to Studying the Impact of Moderate Red-Wine Consumption on Urinary Metabolome. J. Proteome Res. 2018, 17, 1624–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rotches-Ribalta, M.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Llorach, R.; Boto-Ordoñez, M.; Jauregui, O.; Chiva-Blanch, G.; Perez-Garcia, L.; Jaeger, W.; Guillen, M.; Corella, D.; et al. Gut and microbial resveratrol metabolite profiling after moderate long-term consumption of red wine versus dealcoholized red wine in humans by an optimized ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1265, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. De La Torre, R. Bioavailability of olive oil phenolic compounds in humans. Inflammopharmacology 2008, 16, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bitsch, R.; Netzel, M.; Frank, T.; Strass, G.; Bitsch, I. Bioavailability and Biokinetics of Anthocyanins from Red Grape Juice and Red Wine. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004, 2004, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.