Next Article in Journal
Food Addiction and Lifestyle Habits among University Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends in Eating Habits and Body Weight Status, Perception Patterns and Management Practices among First-Year Students of Kaunas (Lithuania) Universities, 2000–2017
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Interventions to Promote Healthy Meals in Full-Service Restaurants and Canteens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/nu13041351
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

And yet Again: Having Breakfast Is Positively Associated with Lower BMI and Healthier General Eating Behavior in Schoolchildren

by
Peggy Ober
1,2,3,†,
Carolin Sobek
1,2,*,†,
Nancy Stein
3,
Ulrike Spielau
2,3,
Sarah Abel
1,2,3,
Wieland Kiess
1,2,
Christof Meigen
1,2,
Tanja Poulain
1,2,
Ulrike Igel
1,2,4,
Tobias Lipek
1,2,3,† and
Mandy Vogel
1,2,†
1
LIFE Child, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Ph-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Center for Pediatric Research (CPL), Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Liebigstr. 20a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
3
Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
4
Department of Social Work, University of Applied Science, Altonaer Str. 25, 99085 Erfurt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2021, 13(4), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041351
Submission received: 17 March 2021 / Revised: 13 April 2021 / Accepted: 16 April 2021 / Published: 18 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Community Nutrition and Food Behavior)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Given the high prevalence of childhood overweight, school-based programs aiming at nutritional behavior may be a good starting point for community-based interventions. Therefore, we investigated associations between school-related meal patterns and weight status in 1215 schoolchildren. Anthropometry was performed on-site in schools. Children reported their meal habits, and parents provided family-related information via questionnaires. Associations between nutritional behavior and weight status were estimated using hierarchical linear and logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for age, socio–economic status, school type, migration background, and parental weight status. Having breakfast was associated with a lower BMI-SDS (βadj = −0.51, p = 0.004) and a lower risk of being overweight (ORadj = 0.30, p = 0.009), while having two breakfasts resulting in stronger associations (BMI-SDS: βadj = −0.66, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: ORadj = 0.22, p = 0.001). Likewise, children who regularly skipped breakfast on school days showed stronger associations (BMI-SDS: β = 0.49, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: OR = 3.29, p < 0.001) than children who skipped breakfast only occasionally (BMI-SDS: β = 0.43, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: OR = 2.72, p = 0.032). The associations persisted after controlling for parental SES and weight status. Therefore, our data confirm the school setting as a suitable starting point for community-based interventions and may underline the necessity of national programs providing free breakfast and lunch to children.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Childhood obesity is a major public health challenge for societies worldwide. The prevalence stagnated at high levels after significantly increasing since the 1980s [1,2,3]. In Germany, 15.4% of children and adolescents are overweight, and 5.9% are obese [4]. As obese children are very likely to remain obese later in life [5], often afflicted with a multitude of sequelae, the persistent high prevalence of childhood obesity poses an enormous economic burden on societies [6].
Overweight is strongly linked to social inequalities. In western societies, the proportion of overweight and obesity is highest among children and adolescents of low socio–economic status (SES) [4,7,8]. Hence, the SES is one part of a multifactorial obesogenic environment to which children are exposed [9,10]. In addition, high intakes of energy-providing food and beverages, high media use, and parental overweight are relevant risk factors for childhood obesity [11,12]. These risk factors are linked to the home environment and are therefore very difficult to address with preventive interventions, especially in low SES families [13].
Similarly, whether and how meals are eaten depends on family habits and parental behavior [14,15]. However, during a school week, children and adolescents spend most of their waking time at school. Therefore, breakfast and lunch behavior is partly dependent on the schedule and food availability within the school environment. Interventions in schools are a cost-effective opportunity to promote healthy behaviors and to create a healthy environment [16]. Thus, the school setting offers a particularly suitable starting point for interventions because of its unique potential to reach children of all social backgrounds, independently of their home environment.
To facilitate tailored interventions, this study aimed to examine the nutritional behavior of schoolchildren and its association with weight status.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Sample

In the cross-sectional Leipzig school nutrition study, we collected data in public and private schools in Leipzig, Germany. The data were collected between May 2018 and May 2019. Schools were chosen from predefined areas within Leipzig based on socio–economic data and overweight prevalence as described by Igel et al. [17]. All schools within these areas (n = 42) were eligible. After the approval of the school administration, all classes in grade four (elementary schools) and grades 6–8 (secondary schools) were invited to participate. Informed consent was obtained from all parents of participating children (rates can be seen in Figure 1). Finally, 34 schools participated, and 1215 children and adolescents were recruited there. The schools did not receive any financial benefits. The children received a financial incentive of five euros. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Medical Faculty of the Leipzig University (number 483/17-ek).

2.2. Setting

The survey took place in the schools. The study leader led the children through the entire survey. The parents were asked about family socio–demographic characteristics through a questionnaire completed at home.

2.3. Instruments

Body height was measured, without wearing shoes, with an accuracy of 0.1 cm, using a portable stadiometer (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Body weight was measured with an accuracy of 0.1 kg, wearing underwear and one layer of top clothing, with a calibrated electronic scale (Kern, Balingen, Germany). Weight was corrected for the estimated weight of the clothing [18,19]. Subsequently, the body mass index (BMI) was calculated and transformed to standard deviation scores (SDS) using the references from Kromeyer-Hauschild [20], according to the German guidelines of the German Working Group of Obesity in Childhood and Adolescents [21]. SDS allowed the assessment of weight status in the context of age and sex by transforming a BMI value into its deviation from the age- and sex-dependent mean expectation, measured in multiples of a standard deviation. SDS are equivalent to Z-scores [22]. The weight groups were defined as normal weight (BMI-SDS <1.28) and overweight/obese (BMI-SDS ≥1.28) [20,21]. All procedures were conducted by a trained pediatric nurse following standard protocols.
Breakfast habits were assessed by asking children if they usually eat breakfast on school days. Response options were “No”/“Yes”, “at home before I go to school”/“Yes, at school—I buy something”/“Yes, at school—I bring something from home”. Multiple answers were allowed. Children who only checked the “No” option were defined as regular breakfast skippers, whereas children who checked “No” and at least one of the other options were defined as occasional breakfast skippers. The number of breakfasts was defined as “0” if the children were regular breakfast skippers and “2” if the children had one breakfast at home and one at school. Otherwise, the number of breakfasts was set to “1”. Lunchtime behavior was assessed by asking the children what they usually eat for lunch on school days. Response options were “I buy something on the way or outside school area”/“I eat what my parents give me”/“I eat what is offered in the school canteen”/“I eat nothing for lunch at school”. Multiple answers were allowed. Children who checked the “I eat nothing for lunch at school” option were defined as lunch skippers, whereas children who checked one of the remaining options were grouped as lunch consumers.
Information on the parents’ highest level of education (general and vocational), the current occupational position, and monthly equivalized disposable household income were combined to assess the SES as a modified Winkler Index [23]. The resulting score ranged between three and 21 and was classified into low (<8.5), moderate (8.5–15.4), and high (>15.4) according to the KiGGS study [24], a current representative study of German children and adolescents. Additionally, the migration background was asked for (“Yes” if at least one of the parents was born abroad). Self-reported weight and height of both parents were used to calculate parental BMI. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), subjects having a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 were classified as having overweight [25].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were given as the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Associations between breakfast skipping, having lunch, and overweight as dependent variables and age, SES score, SES group, school type, migration background, and parental weight status as independent variables were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models. Correspondingly, the hierarchical linear regression models were applied to assess the associations between BMI-SDS and the covariates. Furthermore, the association of overweight, BMI-SDS, and having lunch as the outcome and breakfast skipping and the number of breakfasts per day were examined. Finally, a hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed with overweight/obesity as dependent and having no lunch as the independent variable. After assessing the bivariate associations, multivariate models were built based on the full model containing the covariates mentioned above using stepwise backward deletion. Models were adjusted for age and sex if necessary. To account for clustering effects, the school was added as a random effect. Due to the high collinearity leading to variance inflation, models containing the school type as a covariate were not adjusted for age. Additionally, due to a strong dependence between school type and the school itself, the models with school type as the only covariate were modeled without random effect. In addition, interactions between the covariates were tested. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools [26]. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.0 [27]. The level of significance was set to α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Sample

Thirty-four schools were recruited for the study (Figure 1). From these schools, 3107 children were eligible for participation. The participation rates varied considerably between the school types. In elementary schools, 43.6% (n = 690) of students participated. In secondary schools, attendance varied between 26.9% (n = 178) for lower secondary schools and 47.2% (n = 347) for upper secondary schools (usually leading to tertiary education). The parents´ questionnaire response rate was 88% (n = 607)/73.6% (n = 131)/86.2% (n = 299) for elementary/lower secondary/upper secondary schools. Finally, 1215 students were studied in school, of which 1037 parents´ questionnaires (85%) were returned. The mean age of the total sample was 11.32 years (SD = 1.35, range: 8.94–15.42), 617 were girls, and the BMI-SDS was µ = −0.04 (SD = 1.08, range: −3.58–2.99). The prevalence of overweight/obesity was 12.2% (n = 148). A more detailed description of the study population characteristics is shown in Table 1.

3.2. Breakfast and Lunch Behavior

More than half of the students (67.5%, n = 820) ate breakfast at home before school, and 76.5% (n = 860) reported buying something or bringing something from home for breakfast at school. Considering breakfast frequency, 47% (n = 569) of children had breakfast once a day and a further 47% (n = 569) of the children had breakfast twice a school day—once at home and once at school. Among the children studied, 8.1% (n = 98) often did not eat breakfast, neither at home nor at school. Among these, about a third (n = 26) were occasional breakfast skippers (had breakfast on some days), and 72 were regular breakfast skippers. Parameters associated with regular breakfast skipping are summarized in Table 2. Older children skipped breakfast more often than younger children (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.27–1.87, p < 0.001). Girls skipped breakfast more often than boys (OR = 1.23, 95%CI: 1.23–1.24, p < 0.001), and the migration background was also related to higher skipping rates (ORadj = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.69–1.71, p < 0.001). SES was inversely related to breakfast skipping, with lower skipping in children with higher SES (OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.77–0.93, p < 0.001). Importantly, this association persisted after adjustment (ORadj = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.77–0.93, p < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant association between parental overweight and breakfast skipping, maybe due to a high number of missing parental overweight status (n = 321).
Most of the students (83.4%, n = 1013) ate something for lunch. For nearly all of them, lunch was the second main meal of the school day (96.0%, n = 972). The probability that a child eats lunch during the school day increased with having breakfast. Children having one breakfast were more likely to have lunch compared to breakfast skippers (OR = 3.79, 95%CI: 2.17–6.62, p < 0.001). For children having two breakfasts, the association was even stronger with OR = 5.13 (95%CI: 2.89–9.10, p < 0.001). These associations persisted after adjustment (one breakfast: ORadj = 3.89, 95%CI: 1.90–7.96, p < 0.001; two breakfasts: ORadj = 5.25, 95%CI: 2.52–10.90, p < 0.001).

3.3. Association of Breakfast and Lunch Behavior with Overweight

Children having one breakfast on school days (whether at home or at school) had on average a 0.5 lower BMI-SDS than children who had not (βadj = −0.51, 95%CI: −0.86–−0.15, p = 0.004) and were significantly less likely to be overweight (ORadj = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.12–0.76, p = 0.009). The associations were moderately stronger when children had two breakfasts (BMI-SDS: βadj = −0.66, 95%CI: −1.02–−0.31, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: ORadj = 0.22, 95%CI: 0.09–0.56, p = 0.001). In addition, children who regularly skipped breakfast on school days showed stronger associations (BMI-SDS: β = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.23–0.75, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: OR = 3.29, 95%CI: 1.86–5.82, p < 0.001) than children who skipped breakfast only occasionally (BMI-SDS: β = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.20–0.66, p < 0.001; risk of overweight: OR = 2.72, 95%CI: −1.07–−6.93, p = 0.032). Moreover, having lunch was associated with lower BMI-SDS and a lower risk of being overweight, but the association lost statistical significance after adjustment. Unadjusted and adjusted associations are shown in Figure 2.

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Findings

Our data show associations of weekday eating habits with the prevalence of overweight in 4th- and 6th- to 8th-grade students in a city of about 600,000 inhabitants in Germany. Unsteady breakfast habits, skipping breakfast, or not having lunch during the school day were positively associated with the prevalence of being overweight. The associations with having breakfast persist after controlling for known risk factors like parental overweight and SES [28]. Having two breakfasts resulted in even stronger associations. The finding that children with a low SES skipped breakfast more often confirms our hypothesis as well as previous research [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].

4.2. Breakfast Behavior

More than two-thirds of the participating students reported regular breakfast consumption on school days, a rate similar to rates reported in other studies [28,36]. Moreover, our rate of about 6% complete breakfast skippers is similar to that of other studies from Europe and the US [28,37,38]. The observation that older students are more likely to skip breakfast than younger ones supports the study by Hallström, Monzani, Wadolowska and Smith [28,33,35,39]. Possible reasons might be the shrinking parental influence on adolescent eating behavior [36], the shortage of time due to late wake-up times [39,40], or dieting and weight-control behavior during adolescence [31]. Consistently, we found that children from secondary schools skipped breakfast more frequently than children from primary schools. This effect might be explained by the older age. In line with the systematic review by Monzani [39], we found that girls skipped breakfast more often than boys. Migration background was also associated with a higher risk of breakfast skipping, which is equivalent to the findings of Kesztyüs al. and Pedersen et al. [29,32].
Moreover, in another German study that found a significant association between breakfast skipping and weight status, the association lost statistical significance after adjusting for migration background, suggesting a potential mediating role of breakfast habits may be caused by cultural differences [41]. Of note, some children might not skip breakfast deliberately but are not offered breakfast because parents do not provide breakfast or do not consume breakfast themselves [14,36]. On the other hand, despite this being frequently reported [32,42], we could not confirm the association between parental overweight and breakfast skipping, a result which may be caused by a high proportion of missing data for parental overweight.
The proportion of participants who had two breakfasts exceeded the rates known from American literature [40,43]: while 47% of the students had one breakfast, another 47% had two breakfasts on their school days. A possible explanation is the overrepresentation of elementary school students in our population. For younger children, the reasons for breakfast skipping, as mentioned above, are less important.
According to a Swedish study, the energy not consumed during breakfast is not compensated by higher energy intake from lunch or dinner, but rather a higher intake of snack food and in-between meals [44]. Consistently, there have been associations shown between breakfast behavior and weight status, as discussed below.

4.3. Lunch Behavior

In our cohort, more than 80% of the students had regular lunch during school, which is in line with previous works [44,45,46]. We could confirm the results of Sjöberg et al., who found breakfast skipping to be associated with skipping other main meals [44], as we found that having breakfast increased the likelihood of having lunch. This strong link between breakfast and lunch habits may reflect an underlying trait of regular eating habits in general. As another work from Germany stated, breakfast intake alone does not explain the inverse association between higher meal frequency and childhood obesity [47]. Likewise, regular meal patterns might also be related to more general lifestyle habits [31,44]. The robust connection between having lunch and other health-related behavior could be one reason why the relation between having lunch and the risk of being overweight did not persist after controlling for other lifestyle factors, such as having breakfast.

4.4. Association of Breakfast and Lunch Behavior with Overweight

Our main results show that regular breakfast and lunch intake were associated with a lower BMI-SDS in children and adolescents. In line with Wang et al. and Bruening et al., we found students having two breakfasts had the lowest risk of being overweight, and breakfast skippers had the highest risk [40,43]. These findings could be explained due to the protective influence of a high meal frequency (e.g., five or more meals) on childhood obesity [47]. We speculate that a causal mechanism is the inverse association between meal frequency and mostly unhealthy snacking behavior. Skipping main meals, such as breakfast and lunch, was associated with a less healthy food choice, and the energy not consumed during breakfast was compensated by a rather higher intake from snack food instead of other main meals [44]. Given that the relation with having lunch could be explained by the covariates, the breakfast behavior seems to be of more importance. This is consistent with data from Gleason et al., who found an association of BMI with having school breakfast but not with having school lunch [48]. Moreover, Antonogeorgos et al. found that having regular meals during the day had only a positive health effect if children had breakfast [38].
We did not find any significant interaction, neither between the covariates and SES nor between the covariates and parental overweight. Contrarily, the multinational ISCOLE-study found a significant interaction between breakfast skipping and study site when modeling weight status [49]. In this work, the study sites represented a wide range of economic development and, hence, can be seen as an ecological proxy for SES. Beyond, although multiple studies reported that breakfast skipping is associated with both higher BMI and lower SES, in most of these studies, these associations were examined separately without reporting interactions [33,50].
In addition, having breakfast is associated with higher energy intake and the higher consumption of fruits, vegetables, and fiber [51]. As in our setting, measuring total energy uptake and the food composition was not feasible, we could not correct for these confounders. Moreover, we did not analyze dinner habits. However, our study is one of many providing evidence that having breakfast supports health-related behavior far beyond the mere energy intake facet [44,47,48].
It should be emphasized that the association between overweight and breakfast skipping could not be explained by the most common predictors of overweight, SES, and parental overweight [11,52,53]. Therefore, interventions targeting breakfast behavior provide a suitable starting point for weight gain interventions even more because breakfast can be integrated into the school day—and is therefore independent of the child´s social background. This approach is particularly promising given that children who had one breakfast on school days had on average a 0.5 lower BMI-SDS than children who had not. In comparison, conservative weight-loss treatments resulted in a weight loss in amounts from 0.05 to 0.39 one year after the start of the treatment in subjects that already suffered from overweight [54]. Thus, the effect size seems also clinically important. Subsidized meal programs that target breakfast participation in schools and childcare institutions are on the rise. While the federally assisted Breakfast Program in the US was permanently entitled since 1975 [55], the French Government has only recently introduced free breakfast in schools in prioritized areas [56]. Additionally, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) specifies that schools and childcare institutions have to serve meals meeting federal nutrition requirements. Whether and to what extent a free school breakfast can lead to more favorable eating behavior and associated weight loss is not yet clearly established [48,57,58,59,60]. In contrast, a lack of governmental efforts in Germany may be seen. An EU school program supports schools in 12 of the 16 federal states to offer fruit, vegetables, and milk during the school day [61]. Together with the efforts of single non-profit organizations [62], this may not be to reach children and adolescents nationwide. Comprehensive, centrally funded solutions are desirable to avoid exacerbating the disadvantage of already deprived groups in the educational system.

4.5. Strength and Weaknesses

Our study examined a large sample size of elementary and secondary schoolchildren and their parents. However, the generalizability might be limited because the study population consisted largely of urban children. Moreover, the participants were of higher socio–economic status in comparison with the nationally representative sample [63]. However, this bias was smaller than in comparable studies due to the study design. Sampling within Leipzig was school centered rather than family centered, based on socio–economic data and the prevalence of overweight. Participation rates were even slightly higher than those of the KiGGS study, except for lower secondary school students [24,63]. This might be related to selective compliance, a common phenomenon in health survey participation causing the overrepresentation of the higher vs. the lower social strata [64,65]. Subsequently, the observed rate of overweight was slightly lower than the rates observed in a register-based study and the national reference study (~12% vs. ~17% and 15%) [2,4]. However, the rates are still at a comparable level. Moreover, assuming that non-participation was more likely among socially disadvantaged families, we would expect even stronger associations in the target population.
In addition, the school setting did not allow anthropometric measurements in underwear as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, the weight status of the children was assessed in a standardized weighing procedure rather than by self-reporting. The procedure included the adjustment for clothing. This method was used in previous research, and the inaccuracy of weight measures is reasonably small [18].

5. Conclusions

Our study reveals that a considerable proportion of children skipped breakfast, with differing rates depending on personal and family characteristics. Unsteady breakfast habits, skipping breakfast, or not having lunch were positively associated with overweight in schoolchildren. The associations with regular breakfast persisted regardless of parental overweight and SES, with having two breakfasts resulting in stronger associations. Therefore, interventions targeting healthier nutrition and its positive side effects by providing school breakfast seem to be promising, even more so because children of low SES are skipping breakfast more frequently. Such interventions can be implemented within the school setting and therefore, reach students across all social strata, independently of their home environments. Finally, our results confirm the school setting as a suitable starting point for community-based interventions and may underline the necessity of national programs providing free breakfast and lunch to children.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L., U.I., and U.S.; methodology, T.L. and M.V.; software C.M. and M.V.; validation, T.L. and M.V.; formal analysis P.O., C.S., C.M. and T.P.; investigation, P.O., T.L, U.S., S.A. and N.S.; resources, W.K.; data curation, P.O., C.M. and M.V.; writing—original draft preparation P.O. and C.S. writing—review and editing, C.S., P.O., U.I., T.P., T.L. and M.V.; visualization, P.O., C.S. and M.V.; supervision, T.L., M.V. and W.K.; project administration, P.O.; and funding acquisition, T.L., M.V. and W.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, FKZ: 01EO1501; by the Free State of Saxony as per the budget approved by the state parliament (GeoEtiology); by the Regional Development Fund (LIFE Forschungszentrum), and by means of the Free State of Saxony within the framework of the excellence initiative.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Leipzig University (number 483/17-ek and date of approval). Further, the study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00017317).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study and their parents.

Data Availability Statement

The legal requirements and the given informed consent do not allow public sharing of the dataset. Interested researchers can contact the research data management of the Medical Faculty, University Leipzig: [email protected] for further information. The dataset ID is PID-00080/01.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participating schools, the children, and their parents for their efforts and Saxonian Bildungsagentur for supporting our study. Moreover, we are grateful for the advice of Gesine Grande (BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg) and Ruth Gausche (CrescNet, Leipzig) on setting up this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Blüher, S.; Meigen, C.; Gausche, R.; Keller, E.; Pfäffle, R.; Sabin, M.; Werther, G.; Odeh, R.; Kiess, W. Age-Specific Stabilization in Obesity Prevalence in German Children: A Cross-Sectional Study from 1999 to 2008. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. IJPO Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2011, 6, e199–e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kess, A.; Spielau, U.; Beger, C.; Gausche, R.; Vogel, M.; Lipek, T.; Körner, A.; Pfäffle, R.; Kiess, W. Further Stabilization and Even Decrease in the Prevalence Rates of Overweight and Obesity in German Children and Adolescents from 2005 to 2015: A Cross-Sectional and Trend Analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 3075–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Garrido-Miguel, M.; Cavero-Redondo, I.; Álvarez-Bueno, C.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.; Moreno, L.A.; Ruiz, J.R.; Ahrens, W.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. Prevalence and Trends of Overweight and Obesity in European Children from 1999 to 2016. JAMA Pediatr. 2019, 173, e192430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Robert Koch-Institut. Overweight and Obesity among Children and Adolescents in Germany. Results of the Cross-Sectional KiGGS Wave 2 Study and Trends. J. Health Monit. 2018. [CrossRef]
  5. Geserick, M.; Vogel, M.; Gausche, R.; Lipek, T.; Spielau, U.; Keller, E.; Pfäffle, R.; Kiess, W.; Körner, A. Acceleration of BMI in Early Childhood and Risk of Sustained Obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sharma, V.; Coleman, S.; Nixon, J.; Sharples, L.; Hamilton-Shield, J.; Rutter, H.; Bryant, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Estimating the Population Prevalence of Comorbidities in Children and Adolescents Aged 5 to 18 Years. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2019, 20, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lange, D.; Plachta-Danielzik, S.; Landsberg, B.; Müller, M.J. Soziale Ungleichheit, Migrationshintergrund, Lebenswelten und Ubergewicht bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Ergebnisse der Kieler Adipositas-Präventionsstudie (KOPS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2010, 53, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shrewsbury, V.; Wardle, J. Socioeconomic Status and Adiposity in Childhood: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies 1990–2005. Obesity 2008, 16, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lake, A.; Townshend, T. Obesogenic Environments: Exploring the Built and Food Environments. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health 2006, 126, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. World Health Organization. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-92-4-151006-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kleiser, C.; Schaffrath Rosario, A.; Mensink, G.B.M.; Prinz-Langenohl, R.; Kurth, B.-M. Potential Determinants of Obesity among Children and Adolescents in Germany: Results from the Cross-Sectional KiGGS Study. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Plachta-Danielzik, S.; Kehden, B.; Landsberg, B.; Rosario, A.S.; Kurth, B.-M.; Arnold, C.; Graf, C.; Hense, S.; Ahrens, W.; Müller, M.J. Attributable Risks for Childhood Overweight: Evidence for Limited Effectiveness of Prevention. Pediatrics 2012, 130, e865–e871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Langnäse, K.; Asbeck, I.; Mast, M.; Müller, M.J. The Influence of Socio-economic Status on the Long-term Effect of Family-based Obesity Treatment Intervention in Prepubertal Overweight Children. Health Educ. 2004, 104, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okada, C.; Tabuchi, T.; Iso, H. Association between Skipping Breakfast in Parents and Children and Childhood Overweight/Obesity among Children: A Nationwide 10.5-Year Prospective Study in Japan. Int. J. Obes. 2018, 42, 1724–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dallacker, M.; Hertwig, R.; Mata, J. The Frequency of Family Meals and Nutritional Health in Children: A Meta-Analysis: Family Meals and Children’s Health. Obes. Rev. 2018, 19, 638–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in the WHO European Region 2016–2025. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/pages/policy/publications/action-plan-for-the-prevention-and-control-of-noncommunicable-diseases-in-the-who-european-region-20162025 (accessed on 2 March 2021).
  17. Igel, U.; Gausche, R.; Lück, M.; Molis, D.; Lipek, T.; Schubert, K.; Kiess, W.; Grande, G. Community-Based Health Promotion for Prevention of Childhood Obesity. Ernähr. Umsch. 2015, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Censi, L.; Spinelli, A.; Roccaldo, R.; Bevilacqua, N.; Lamberti, A.; Angelini, V.; Nardone, P.; Baglio, G. Dressed or Undressed? How to Measure Children’s Body Weight in Overweight Surveillance? Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 2715–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Tuan, T.; Marsh, D.R.; Ha, T.T.; Schroeder, D.G.; Thach, T.D.; Dung, V.M.; Huong, N.T. Weighing Vietnamese Children: How Accurate Are Child Weights Adjusted for Estimates of Clothing Weight? Food Nutr. Bull. 2002, 23, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kromeyer-Hauschild, K.; Wabitsch, M.; Kunze, D.; Geller, F.; Geiss, H.C.; Hesse, V.; Von Hippel, A.; Jaeger, U.; Johnsen, D.; Korte, W.; et al. Percentiles of Body Mass Index in Children and Adolescents Evaluated from Different Regional German Studies. Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd. 2001, 149, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wabitsch, M.; Moss, A. [Evidence-Based (S3) Guideline of the Working Group on Childhood and Adolescent Obesity (AGA) of the German Obesity Society (DAG) and the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ)] 2019. Available online: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/050-002.html (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  22. Cheung, Y.B. Statistical Analysis of Human Growth and Development; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4398-7154-6. [Google Scholar]
  23. Winkler, J.; Stolzenberg, H. Adjustierung des Sozialen-Schicht-Index für die Anwendung im Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS) 2003/2006; Hochschule, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Wismar, Germany, 2009; ISBN 978-3-939159-76-6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Robert Koch-Institut. Socioeconomic Status and Subjective Social Status Measurement in KiGGS Wave 2. J. Health Monit. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, P.A.; Taylor, R.; Minor, B.L.; Elliot, V.; Fernandes, M.; O’Neal, L.; Mc Leod, L.; Delacqua, G.; Delacqua, F.; Kirby, J.; et al. The REDCap Consortium: Building an International Community of Software Platform Partners. J. Biomed. Inform. 2019, 95, 103208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hallström, L.; Vereecken, C.A.; Labayen, I.; Ruiz, J.R.; Le Donne, C.; García, M.C.; Gilbert, C.C.; Martínez, S.G.; Grammatikaki, E.; Huybrechts, I.; et al. Breakfast Habits among European Adolescents and Their Association with Sociodemographic Factors: The HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 1879–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pedersen, T.P.; Holstein, B.E.; Damsgaard, M.T.; Rasmussen, M. Breakfast Frequency among Adolescents: Associations with Measures of Family Functioning. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 1552–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Barrett, N.; Riordan, F.; Michels, N.; Frost Andersen, L.; vant Veer, P.; Moreno, L.A.; Widhalm, K.; Manios, Y.; Gottrand, F.; Santaliestra-Pasías, A.M.; et al. Breakfast Skipping and Overweight/Obesity among European Adolescents, a Cross-Sectional Analysis of the HELENA Dataset: A DEDIPAC Study. HRB Open Res. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Timlin, M.T.; Pereira, M.A.; Story, M.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Breakfast Eating and Weight Change in a 5-Year Prospective Analysis of Adolescents: Project EAT (Eating Among Teens). Pediatrics 2008, 121, e638–e645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kesztyüs, D.; Traub, M.; Lauer, R.; Kesztyüs, T.; Steinacker, J.M. Skipping Breakfast Is Detrimental for Primary School Children: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Determinants for Targeted Prevention. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wadolowska, L.; Hamulka, J.; Kowalkowska, J.; Ulewicz, N.; Gornicka, M.; Jeruszka-Bielak, M.; Kostecka, M.; Wawrzyniak, A. Skipping Breakfast and a Meal at School: Its Correlates in Adiposity Context. Report from the ABC of Healthy Eating Study of Polish Teenagers. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shiyam, V.; Nishanthini, N.; Niranjjan, R.; Lokeshmaran, A. A Comparative Study on Dietary Pattern and Their Associated Factors among the Rural and Urban School Going Adolescents. Ann. Community Health 2021, 8, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, K.J.; Breslin, M.C.; McNaughton, S.A.; Gall, S.L.; Blizzard, L.; Venn, A.J. Skipping Breakfast among Australian Children and Adolescents; Findings from the 2011–12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2017, 41, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Keski-Rahkonen, A.; Kaprio, J.; Rissanen, A.; Virkkunen, M.; Rose, R.J. Breakfast Skipping and Health-Compromising Behaviors in Adolescents and Adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sandercock, G.R.H.; Voss, C.; Dye, L. Associations between Habitual School-Day Breakfast Consumption, Body Mass Index, Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in English Schoolchildren. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Antonogeorgos, G.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Papadimitriou, A.; Priftis, K.N.; Anthracopoulos, M.; Nicolaidou, P. Breakfast Consumption and Meal Frequency Interaction with Childhood Obesity. Pediatr. Obes. 2012, 7, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Monzani, A.; Ricotti, R.; Caputo, M.; Solito, A.; Archero, F.; Bellone, S.; Prodam, F. A Systematic Review of the Association of Skipping Breakfast with Weight and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents. What Should We Better Investigate in the Future? Nutrients 2019, 11, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bruening, M.; Afuso, K.; Mason, M. Associations of Eating Two Breakfasts With Childhood Overweight Status, Sociodemographics, and Parental Factors Among Preschool Students. Health Educ. Behav. 2016, 43, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagel, G.; Wabitsch, M.; Galm, C.; Berg, S.; Brandstetter, S.; Fritz, M.; Klenk, J.; Peter, R.; Prokopchuk, D.; Steiner, R.; et al. Determinants of Obesity in the Ulm Research on Metabolism, Exercise and Lifestyle in Children (URMEL-ICE). Eur. J. Pediatr. 2009, 168, 1259–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alsharairi, N.A.; Somerset, S.M. Skipping Breakfast in Early Childhood and Its Associations with Maternal and Child BMI: A Study of 2-5-Year-Old Australian Children. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, S.; Schwartz, M.B.; Shebl, F.M.; Read, M.; Henderson, K.E.; Ickovics, J.R. School Breakfast and Body Mass Index: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Middle School Students. Pediatr. Obes. 2017, 12, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sjöberg, A.; Hallberg, L.; Höglund, D.; Hulthén, L. Meal Pattern, Food Choice, Nutrient Intake and Lifestyle Factors in The Göteborg Adolescence Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 1569–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Viljakainen, J.; de Oliveira Figueiredo, R.A.; Viljakainen, H.; Roos, E.; Weiderpass, E.; Rounge, T.B. Eating Habits and Weight Status in Finnish Adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 2617–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pedersen, T.P.; Meilstrup, C.; Holstein, B.E.; Rasmussen, M. Fruit and Vegetable Intake Is Associated with Frequency of Breakfast, Lunch and Evening Meal: Cross-Sectional Study of 11-, 13-, and 15-Year-Olds. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Toschke, A.M.; Thorsteinsdottir, K.H.; Kries, R. von Meal Frequency, Breakfast Consumption and Childhood Obesity. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. IJPO Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2009, 4, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gleason, P.M.; Dodd, A.H. School Breakfast Program but Not School Lunch Program Participation Is Associated with Lower Body Mass Index. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, S118–S128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zakrzewski, J.K.; Gillison, F.B.; Cumming, S.; Church, T.S.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Broyles, S.T.; Champagne, C.M.; Chaput, J.-P.; Denstel, K.D.; Fogelholm, M.; et al. Associations between Breakfast Frequency and Adiposity Indicators in Children from 12 Countries. Int. J. Obes. Suppl. 2015, 5, S80–S88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tin, S.P.P.; Ho, S.Y.; Mak, K.H.; Wan, K.L.; Lam, T.H. Breakfast Skipping and Change in Body Mass Index in Young Children. Int. J. Obes. 2011, 35, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Giménez-Legarre, N.; Flores-Barrantes, P.; Miguel-Berges, M.L.; Moreno, L.A.; Santaliestra-Pasías, A.M. Breakfast Characteristics and Their Association with Energy, Macronutrients, and Food Intake in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, Z.; Phung, H.; Hughes, A.-M.; Sherwood, S.; Harper, E.; Kelly, P. Trends in Overweight and Obesity by Socioeconomic Status in Year 6 School Children, Australian Capital Territory, 2006–2018. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Danielzik, S.; Czerwinski-Mast, M.; Langnäse, K.; Dilba, B.; Müller, M.J. Parental Overweight, Socioeconomic Status and High Birth Weight Are the Major Determinants of Overweight and Obesity in 5–7 y-Old Children: Baseline Data of the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS). Int. J. Obes. 2004, 28, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Mühlig, Y.; Wabitsch, M.; Moss, A.; Hebebrand, J. Weight Loss in Children and Adolescents. Dtsch. Ärztebl. Int. 2014, 111, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. SBP Fact Sheet | USDA-FNS. Available online: https://www.fns.usda.gov/sbp/sbp-fact-sheet (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  56. Les Petits-Déjeuners Gratuits à l’école, c’est Parti. Available online: https://www.gouvernement.fr/les-petits-dejeuners-gratuits-a-l-ecole-c-est-parti (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  57. Ask, A.S.; Hernes, S.; Aarek, I.; Johannessen, G.; Haugen, M. Changes in Dietary Pattern in 15 Year Old Adolescents Following a 4 Month Dietary Intervention with School Breakfast—A Pilot Study. Nutr. J. 2006, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Ni Mhurchu, C.; Turley, M.; Gorton, D.; Jiang, Y.; Michie, J.; Maddison, R.; Hattie, J. Effects of a Free School Breakfast Programme on School Attendance, Achievement, Psychosocial Function, and Nutrition: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Polonsky, H.M.; Bauer, K.W.; Fisher, J.O.; Davey, A.; Sherman, S.; Abel, M.L.; Hanlon, A.; Ruth, K.J.; Dale, L.C.; Foster, G.D. Effect of a Breakfast in the Classroom Initiative on Obesity in Urban School-Aged Children: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2019, 173, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bardin, S.; Gola, A.A. Analyzing the Association between Student Weight Status and School Meal Participation: Evidence from the School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Das EU-Schulprogramm. Available online: https://www.bmel.de/DE/themen/ernaehrung/gesunde-ernaehrung/kita-und-schule/schulobst.html (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  62. Startseite. Available online: https://www.brotzeitfuerkinder.com/ (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  63. Lampert, T.; Müters, S.; Stolzenberg, H.; Kroll, L.E. KiGGS Study Group [Measurement of socioeconomic status in the KiGGS study: First follow-up (KiGGS Wave 1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2014, 57, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ekholm, O.; Gundgaard, J.; Rasmussen, N.K.R.; Hansen, E.H. The Effect of Health, Socio-Economic Position, and Mode of Data Collection on Non-Response in Health Interview Surveys. Scand. J. Public Health 2010, 38, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Demarest, S.; Van der Heyden, J.; Charafeddine, R.; Tafforeau, J.; Van Oyen, H.; Van Hal, G. Socio-Economic Differences in Participation of Households in a Belgian National Health Survey. Eur. J. Public Health 2013, 23, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 13 01351 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of inclusion and exclusion of study participants. Private schools combine different types of schools.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of inclusion and exclusion of study participants. Private schools combine different types of schools.
Nutrients 13 01351 g001
Nutrients 13 01351 g002 550
Figure 2. Association of different eating habits with mean BMI-SDS/the likelihood of being overweight. (A). Mean BMI-SDS (incl. 95% CI) for children with different breakfast/lunch behavior: Based on the simple hierarchical regression analysis, children with different eating habits also differed in their mean BMI-SDS (black). Most of the associations persisted after adjustment (red). (B). The likelihood of being overweight (incl. 95% CI) for children with different breakfast/lunch behavior: based on the simple hierarchical logistic regression analysis, children with different eating habits also differed in their likelihood of being overweight (black). The difference in the likelihood between children having and not having breakfast remained statistically significant after adjustment (red).
Figure 2. Association of different eating habits with mean BMI-SDS/the likelihood of being overweight. (A). Mean BMI-SDS (incl. 95% CI) for children with different breakfast/lunch behavior: Based on the simple hierarchical regression analysis, children with different eating habits also differed in their mean BMI-SDS (black). Most of the associations persisted after adjustment (red). (B). The likelihood of being overweight (incl. 95% CI) for children with different breakfast/lunch behavior: based on the simple hierarchical logistic regression analysis, children with different eating habits also differed in their likelihood of being overweight (black). The difference in the likelihood between children having and not having breakfast remained statistically significant after adjustment (red).
Nutrients 13 01351 g002
Table
Table 1. Description of the study sample.
Table 1. Description of the study sample.
Study Population (n = 1215)
µ (SD)Rangen (%)
Age (years)11.32 (1.35)8.94–15.42
Sex
Male 598 (49.2)
Female 617 (50.8)
School type
Elementary school 690 (56.8)
Lower secondary school 178 (14.7)
Upper secondary school 347 (28.6)
SES group
Low 90 (10.7)
Medium 467 (55.3)
High 287 (34.0)
Missing 371
Migration background
Yes 196 (19.6)
No 804 (80.4)
Missing 215
BMI-SDS−0.04 (1.08)−3.58–2.99
BMI categorization
BMI-SDS < 1.28 1063 (87.8)
BMI-SDS ≥ 1.28 148 (12.2)
Missing 4
Parental overweight/obesity
(biological parents)
Non 276 (30.9)
Both 180 (20.1)
Mother 155 (31.7)
Father 283 (17.3)
Missing 321
µ: mean; SD: standard deviation; n: count; BMI: body mass index; SES: socio–economic status.
Table
Table 2. Associations between regular breakfast skipping (n = 72) and different dependent variables. Effects are given as odds ratios (incl. 95% CI) for the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses.
Table 2. Associations between regular breakfast skipping (n = 72) and different dependent variables. Effects are given as odds ratios (incl. 95% CI) for the unadjusted and the adjusted analyses.
Parameter Breakfast Skipper (Ref: Breakfast Consumer)
Unadjusted ORAdjusted OR
OR95%-CIp-ValueORadj95%-CIp-Value
Age (per year) 1.54(1.27–1.87)<0.001
SexMaleRef.
Female1.23(1.23–1.24)<0.001
School typeElementary schoolRef.
Secondary school1.80(1.11–2.91)0.0171.80 †(1.11–2.92)0.016
SES groupLow3.42(1.56–7.46)0.0023.33(1.55–7.14)0.002
MediumRef.
High0.70(0.31–1.60)0.3920.68(0.30–1.54)0.350
SES score 0.84(0.77–0.93)<0.0010.85(0.77–0.93)<0.001
Migration backgroundNoRef.
Yes1.69(0.87–3.26)0.1131.70(1.69–1.71)<0.001
Parental overweight (biological parents)Not overweight/obeseRef.
Both overweight/obese0.95(0.34–2.69)0.9280.99(0.35–2.82)0.986
Mother overweight/obese1.82(0.71–4.67)0.2022.05(0.80–5.29)0.130
Father overweight/obese1.08(0.44–2.66)0.8561.04(0.43–2.56)0.926
OR: odds ratio; ORadj: adjusted for age and sex; Ref: reference; †: adjusted only for sex.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ober, P.; Sobek, C.; Stein, N.; Spielau, U.; Abel, S.; Kiess, W.; Meigen, C.; Poulain, T.; Igel, U.; Lipek, T.; et al. And yet Again: Having Breakfast Is Positively Associated with Lower BMI and Healthier General Eating Behavior in Schoolchildren. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041351

AMA Style

Ober P, Sobek C, Stein N, Spielau U, Abel S, Kiess W, Meigen C, Poulain T, Igel U, Lipek T, et al. And yet Again: Having Breakfast Is Positively Associated with Lower BMI and Healthier General Eating Behavior in Schoolchildren. Nutrients. 2021; 13(4):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ober, Peggy, Carolin Sobek, Nancy Stein, Ulrike Spielau, Sarah Abel, Wieland Kiess, Christof Meigen, Tanja Poulain, Ulrike Igel, Tobias Lipek, and et al. 2021. "And yet Again: Having Breakfast Is Positively Associated with Lower BMI and Healthier General Eating Behavior in Schoolchildren" Nutrients 13, no. 4: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop