Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Evolution of Malnutrition and Loss of Muscle Strength after COVID-19: A Major and Neglected Component of Long COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Periodic Religious Fasting for Decades on Nutrient Intakes and the Blood Biochemical Profile
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/nu13113962
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Expenditure, Protein Oxidation and Body Composition in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants

by
Michela Perrone
1,*,
Camilla Menis
1,2,
Pasqua Piemontese
1,
Chiara Tabasso
1,
Domenica Mallardi
1,
Anna Orsi
1,
Orsola Amato
1,
Nadia Liotto
1,
Paola Roggero
1,2 and
Fabio Mosca
1,2
1
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(11), 3962; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113962
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 6 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Metabolism)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nutritional management of preterm infants is a critical point of care, especially because of the increased risk of developing extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR), which is associated with worsened health outcomes. Energy requirements in preterm infants are simply estimated, so the measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) should be a key point in the nutritional evaluation of preterm infants. Although predictive formulae are available, it is well known that they are imprecise. The aim of our study was the evaluation of REE and protein oxidation (Ox) in very low birth weight infants (VLBWI) and the association with the mode of feeding and with body composition at term corrected age. Methods: Indirect calorimetry and body composition were performed at term corrected age in stable very low birth weight infants. Urinary nitrogen was measured in spot urine samples to calculate Ox. Infants were categorized as prevalent human milk (HMF) or prevalent formula diet (PFF). Results: Fifty VLBWI (HMF: 23, PFF: 27) were evaluated at 36.48 ± 0.85 post-conceptional weeks. No significant differences were found in basic characteristics or nutritional intake in the groups at birth and at the assessment. No differences were found in the REE of HMF vs. PFF (59.69 ± 9.8 kcal/kg/day vs. 59.27 ± 13.15 kcal/kg/day, respectively). We found statistical differences in the protein-Ox of HMF vs. PFF (1.7 ± 0.92 g/kg/day vs. 2.8 ± 1.65 g/kg/day, respectively, p < 0.01), and HMF infants had a higher fat-free mass (kg) than PFF infants (2.05 ± 0.26 kg vs. 1.82 ± 0.35 kg, respectively, p < 0.01), measured with air displacement plethysmography. Conclusion: REE is similar in infants with a prevalent human milk diet and in infants fed with formula. The HMF infants showed a lower oxidation rate of proteins for energy purposes and a better quality of growth. A greater amount of protein in HMF is probably used for anabolism and fat-free mass deposition. Further studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis.

1. Introduction

Preterm birth interrupts fetal development, generally during the most critical phase of growth.
Historically, optimal growth has been defined as growth that simulates the intrauterine growth of healthy fetuses of the same post-conceptional age [1]. In recent years, new evidence has shown how this definition is not entirely acceptable, especially regarding very low birth weight infants (VLBWI).
Villar and coworkers recommended that the growth pattern of preterm infants should no longer be compared with the intrauterine growth of healthy fetuses, but with the growth of infants of the same gestational age and sex using adequate growth charts [2].
This change of paradigm is due to the awareness that extrauterine life exposes infants to an environment which is significantly different from the intrauterine one, and this also has some influence on development and growth.
This is because, as healthy as they may be considered, preterm infants present a relative grade of immaturity of organs and physiological and metabolic functions [3].
Preterm infants are in a state of energy deficit at birth, which may continue even during the first weeks of life, and this depends mostly on the abrupt loss of placental nutritional support. Considering the concomitant increase in energy expenditure secondary to enhanced respiratory work, and the higher metabolic demand due to concomitant acute illness [4], ensuring proper growth through adequate nutrition is still a challenge for neonatal care providers [5,6,7,8].
Optimal nutrition has previously been defined as the “energy and protein intake needed to maintain lean body mass and bone density, maximize neurodevelopment and minimize complications” [9]. However, the high incidence of growth retardation in preterm infants worldwide is a demonstration of how the optimization of nutritional support is still difficult to achieve in this population [4,5,10].
Weight is the sum of fat-free mass and fat mass. While weight gain resulting from the increased deposition of fat-free mass is associated with brain growth and better neurodevelopment outcomes at 12 months of life [11,12], it is also known that the excessive deposition of fat mass increases the risk of developing metabolic disturbance and non-communicable diseases during childhood and adulthood [13].
Previous studies conducted at our center demonstrated how the use of fortified human milk in preterm infants is positively associated with a greater deposition of fat-free mass, compared to infants fed with formula milk [14,15]. This finding is probably related to the positive nitrogen balance in infants fed with human milk. Another important point of care is the evaluation of the precise energy and nutrient requirements of VLBWI, in order to define a personalized nutritional program, set for a single patient.
Energy expenditure is often derived from predictive formulae in clinical practice, but current evidence suggests that they are not precise in their evaluation of the energy needs of children and have not been validated in preterm infants [16,17]. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is a non-invasive method to measure energy expenditure in newborns [18,19]. Indeed, IC also provides information about the oxidation of substrates for energy production [20,21,22].
The poor use of this method in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is the result of the necessity to keep infants quiet during the exam, since the values of gases measured (oxygen consumed and carbon dioxide produced) are influenced by movements [23].
In a previous study, conducted at our center, we demonstrated that twenty-minute IC provides results which are as reliable as two- to six-hour IC, as described in the past. This makes the exam more applicable in clinical practice [19].
Knowledge about the real energy and nutrient metabolism of VLBWI allows the prescription of personalized nutrition to guarantee optimal growth for this population.
For this reason, we conducted a study which aimed to evaluate resting energy expenditure, substrate oxidation and body composition at term corrected age in VLBWI, in relation to different modes of feeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. VLBWI were enrolled and evaluated between 36 and 39 post-conceptional weeks.

2.2. Study Population

Very low birth weight infants (birth weight ≤ 1500 gr) with a gestational age of ≤32 weeks, born between January 2019 and December 2020 and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, were enrolled between 36 and 39 post-conceptional weeks, after obtaining informed written consent from parents. The ethical committee of our institution approved the study protocol.
All subjects included were born with a weight appropriate for gestational age according to Intergrowth-21st growth charts [2] and in a stable clinical condition, without major comorbidities. No patients were supplemented with oxygen or were taking chronic medications that could interfere with energy expenditure or growth. Moreover, they had reached full enteral feeding, defined as a mean daily volume of 150 mL/kg, with a good nutrition tolerance. The subjects included in the study are reported in Figure 1.

2.3. Nutritional Practice

During hospitalization, all infants were fed according to internal procedures for nutrition in VLBWI [24].
Parenteral nutrition (PN) was started on the first day of life. The volume of PN was gradually increased during the first week of life, starting from 80–90 mL/kg on the first day, and reaching a volume of 150–180 mL/kg on the seventh day of life. PN bags were prescribed according to ESPGHAN recommendations for the nutritional requirements of preterm infants [25,26]. Specifically, when clinical and metabolic stability was reached, PN provided 60–65 kcal/kg/day with 3.5–4.5 g/kg/day of protein. When the enteral feed reached a quota of 50 mL/kg/day, PN infusion was progressively decreased until suspension.
Enteral feeding was started as soon as possible, preferably within 24 h of postnatal life. Fresh milk from the infant’s mother was the first choice for all infants; if milk from the infant’s mother was not available or insufficient, pasteurized donor human milk was used. When enteral intakes reached 80 mL/kg/day with a good gastrointestinal tolerance, a target fortification using multicomponent bovine-based fortifiers was started, in accordance with ESPGHAN recommendations for the nutritional requirements of preterm infants [25,26].
According to these recommendations [25,26], our goal was to reach an enteral energy intake between 110 and 160 kcal/kg/day, with a protein intake of 3.5–4.5 g/kg/day.
Nutritional analysis (macronutrient and energy content) of donor pasteurized human milk and fresh mother’s milk was performed using a mid-ray spectrometry human milk analyzer (Miris AB), while the nutritional content of the formula was derived from the nutritional table provided by the manufacturer.
A week before discharge, preterm formula with a caloric density between 0.75 and 0.82 kcal/mL was gradually administered instead of pasteurized donor human milk. This shift became necessary because donor human milk would not be available after discharge. Infants were considered as human milk fed (HMF) if ≥75% of the daily volume was represented by human milk, and as formula fed (PFF) if ≥75% of the daily volume was represented by preterm formula. Nutritional intakes were recorded from computerized clinical charts (Neocare), and energy and macronutrient intakes (kcal/kg/day and g/kg/day, respectively) were calculated.

2.4. Clinical Data Collection

Infants’ baseline characteristics and mode of feeding were collected from patients’ computerized clinical charts.

2.5. Anthropometric Measurements

Weight, length and head circumference were measured by trained paramedical staff from our institution according to a standard procedure [27]. Weight was measured using the Seca Baby Scale 376. Length was measured to the nearest 1 mm on a Harpenden Infantometer. Head circumference was measured to the nearest 1 mm using non-stretch measuring tape [28]. Weight, length and head circumference z-scores were calculated using the z-score calculator provided by the Intergrowth-21st project [29].

2.6. Indirect Calorimetry

Indirect calorimetry was performed as previously described by Perrone and coworkers [19].
IC was conducted in a thermally controlled room immediately after a meal, with infants maintained in the supine position to keep them as calm as possible. Vital parameters were monitored continuously during the assessment. Moreover, no alteration in body temperature was detected. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was calculated by the measurement of oxygen consumed (VO2) and carbon dioxide produced (VCO2) through indirect calorimetry (IC) equipment, Quark RMR (COSMED-Italy), under steady state conditions. Steady state refers to a period of a minimum of five consecutive minutes during which the variation coefficients of VO2 and VCO2 values are lower than 10% [30]. Indirect calorimetry is based on the principle of the “open air circuit” system, which permits the measurement of VO2 and VCO2 using a constant flow generator. Expired air was sampled from a canopy placed around the baby. An external flowmeter permitted the adjustment of the flow rate during the exam. The respiratory quotient (RQ) is the ratio between carbon dioxide produced and oxygen consumed and reflects the utilization of different macronutrients as energy sources. In the resting condition, the RQ varies between 0.7 and 1, where a value of 1 reflects a prevalent utilization of carbohydrates as the energy source, while a value of 0.7 is associated with prevalent use of lipids [31].
The flow sensor and gas analyzers were calibrated every day before REE evaluation according to internal procedures. Calibration was considered acceptable if the variance coefficient was less than 1%.
REE measurements were performed for a mean period of 37 min, with a mean steady state period of 25 min. VO2 and VCO2 (mL/kg/min) were recorded every 10 s, and values were normalized using a neonatal convertor, provided by COSMED-Italy [19]. Behavioral states were evaluated using the modified Freymond Behavioral State Scale [23]. IC was stopped at a score of 2 or higher, which identifies an infant moving vigorously.

2.7. Substrate Oxidation

Considering that urinary nitrogen excretion is representative of total nitrogen loss, protein oxidation was calculated from daily urinary nitrogen excretion. A urine sample was collected on the day of IC using the cotton wool ball collection method, as described by Fell and colleagues [32]. Total daily urine output was computed by weighing diapers. Once the urinary nitrogen concentration (uN, g/L) was obtained, we derived protein oxidation (g/kg/day) by applying the formula “urinary nitrogen (g/kg/day) ∗ 6.25/kg of body weight”, where 6.25 is the conversion factor for obtaining protein from nitrogen.
Carbohydrate and lipid oxidation were calculated through the application of Frayn’s formulae that include the measurement of VO2 and VCO2 during IC. The mentioned formulae are as follows [20]:
Carbohydrate oxidation (g/kg/day) = [4.55 ∗ VCO2 (mL/kg)] − [3.21 ∗ VO2 (mL/kg)] − 2.87 ∗ uN
Lipid oxidation (g/kg/day) = [1.67 ∗ VCO2 (mL/kg)] − [1.67 ∗ VO2 (mL/kg)] − 1.92 ∗ uN

2.8. Body Composition

Body composition was assessed using an air displacement plethysmography system (PEA POD Infant Body Composition System; COSMED SRL). The precision and accuracy of this method in the evaluation of infants’ body composition were previously confirmed by Roggero et al. [33].
The assessment of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) was performed through the application of a densitometric model, which takes into account body mass and body volume. Body mass was measured on an integrated electronic scale, and body volume was assessed in the PEA-POD test chamber by applying gas laws. Then, the percentage of body fat, defined as body weight minus fat-free mass, was calculated using body density and constant FM density values (set at 0.9007 g/mL), while FFM density values were calculated as the sum of the contribution of the various components in the fat-free mass compartment [34]. Age- and sex-specific fat-free mass density values deduced from data by Fomon et al. were used [35].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Despite the limited number of subjects in the two groups, we used the mean and standard deviation (SD) instead of the median because the distribution of our population was normal, since the values of the mean and median coincide.
Considering the available data regarding REE in VLBWI according to the mode of feeding [36], we decided to enroll a minimum of 20 VLBWI to have an α-error = 0.05 and a power of 95%. REE, FFM, FM and nutritional intakes were compared by the SPSS 20 statistical package, using the t-test for unpaired data. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

Fifty VLBWI (HMF:23, PFF:27) were evaluated at 36.48 ± 0.85 post-conceptional weeks.
No significant differences were found in basic characteristics at birth or at indirect calorimetry, or in terms of nutritional intakes, in the two groups (Table 1 and Table 2, respectively).
In Table 3, data regarding REE and substrate oxidation are reported.
All infants maintained a behavioral state score lower than 2 according to the Freymond Behavioral State Scale. No differences were found in the REE of HMF vs. PFF (59.69 ± 9.8 kcal/kg/day vs. 59.27 ± 13.15 kcal/kg/day, respectively), while a statistical difference was found if REE was expressed as an REE/FFM ratio (64.18 ± 1.46 kcal/FFM/day vs. 73.31 ± 1.87 kcal/FFM/day in HMF and PFF, respectively, p < 0.001). We found a statistical difference in the protein oxidation of HMF vs. PFF (1.7 ± 0.92 g/kg/day vs. 2.8 ± 1.65 g/kg/day, respectively, p < 0.01). A difference, although not statistically significant, was found in the carbohydrate oxidation rate (7.28 ± 1.36 g/kg/day vs. 7.01 ± 1.97 g/kg/day in HMF and PFF, respectively, p = 0.56). No differences were found in lipid oxidation (1.27 ± 0.37 g/kg/day vs. 1.25 g/kg/day in HMF and PFF, respectively). The respiratory quotient, which is an indirect index of substrate oxidation, was significantly different between the two groups (0.89 ± 0.04 in HMF and 0.85 ± 0.08 in PFF, p < 0.05).
Lastly, significant differences were found in the body composition of the HMF and PFF groups.
In particular, HMF infants presented a higher fat-free mass (kg) than PFF infants (2.05 ± 0.26 kg vs. 1.82 ± 0.35 kg, respectively, p < 0.01). These differences were also significant if fat-free mass was expressed as a percentage of body weight. Data regarding body composition are presented in Table 4.

4. Discussion

In this study, we explored whether the energy metabolism and body composition of stable VLBWI could be influenced by the mode of feeding.
We did not find any significant difference in the REE of HMF vs. PFF infants in terms of kilocalories per kilogram of body weight, but we found that infants with a prevalent human milk diet had lower protein oxidation. A greater amount of protein in HMF is probably used for anabolism and the deposition of fat-free mass. Our hypothesis is supported by the evidence that, in our population, the prevalent human milk diet was associated with a greater percentage of fat-free mass at term corrected age.
In a previous study, Morlacchi et al. had already shown a positive correlation between being fed with human milk and an increased deposition of fat-free mass in VLBWI. Our data corroborate these hypotheses, as we found a mean of 2 kg of FFM in HMF vs. 1.82 kg of FFM in PFF infants (p < 0.01), without differences in weight between the groups at the time of assessment [14].
These data have been confirmed by other authors, who investigated the influence of the mode of feeding on body composition in preterm infants.
Larkade et al. reported a positive correlation between how long VLBWI are fed with human milk (in terms of the number of days) and fat-free mass content at hospital discharge [37]. Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted by Huang et al. concluded that preterm infants fed with formula have a greater fat mass than preterm infants fed with human milk [38].
A study performed by Giannì et al. showed similar results in late preterm infants. They demonstrated that being fed with human milk is associated with a greater deposition of fat-free mass at term corrected age in a population of healthy late preterm infants [15].
A prevalent human milk diet probably promotes tissue growth and fat-free mass deposition if nutritional needs are met. This phenomenon could be explained by the facilitation of intestinal absorption and utilization of macronutrients performed by the protein of human milk, as demonstrated by Lönnerdal and coworkers [39].
This allows us to speculate on the fact that HMF infants have a greater amount of carbohydrates and lipids for energy purposes, as evidenced by the lower protein oxidation found in our population fed with a prevalent human milk diet.
A previous study conducted by Lubetzky and coworkers analyzed, for the first time, the differences in the REE of preterm infants fed with human milk (HM) or formula milk (PF). Infants fed with human milk had lower REE compared with formula-fed infants (52 ± 6 vs. 57 ± 10 kcal/kg day in HM and PF, respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant. When data were reported as the mean REE, corrected for actual calories consumed by the infants, a significant difference was found. Indeed, HM infants had an REE/Kcal ratio of 0.71 ± 1.1, while PF infants had an REE/kcal ratio of 0.85 ± 1.6, p = 0.004) [36].
Mendes Soares conducted a similar analysis centered on differences in REE in preterm infants fed with HM or PF. They concluded that preterm formula produces a better metabolic response compared with human milk, but this difference disappears when human milk is fortified to reach an adequate amount of energy and protein [40].
A similar analysis was published in 1984 by Putet and collaborators [41].
They evaluated energy expenditure using IC and the oxidation of proteins in VLBWI according to the mode of feeding. Preterm infants were divided into two groups: non-fortified human milk diet (HM) vs. preterm formula diet (PF). The study population was evaluated at 36 weeks corrected age. They found a difference in the nutritional intakes (energy 109 ± 11.1 kcal/kg/day and protein 2.36 ± 0.03 g/kg/day in HM infants vs. energy 129.8 kcal/kg/day and protein 3.13 ± 0.1 g/kg/day in PF, p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively.) The oxidation rate of proteins was significantly different at term corrected age (0.51 ± 0.1 g/kg/day in HM vs. 0.76 ± 0.2 g/kg/day in PF, p < 0.05). A significant difference was also found in REE (51.5 ± 2.9 kcal/kg/day vs. 63.3 ± 4.5 kcal/kg/day in HM vs. PF, p < 0.005). Growth parameters were also different, with a mean body weight of 1914 ± 75 g in HM and 2159 ± 87 g in PF (p < 0.002). In this case, the lower REE and lower protein oxidation in HM could be the consequence of the energy and protein intake being insufficient to cover the nutritional needs of preterm infants [41].
In our study, the basic characteristics and the nutritional intakes of infants fed with HM or PF were equal, meaning no influences of inadequate nutritional intake could confound our results.
While previous studies investigated protein balance according to the feeding regimen in preterm infants [14,41,42,43], to our knowledge, this is the first work analyzing substrate oxidation using IC and body composition in VLBWI. Our data show that infants on a prevalent human milk diet use carbohydrates as their preferred source of energy, with a relative preservation of proteins. No differences were found in lipid oxidation between the groups. As a result of this, HMF infants have a greater amount of protein available for anabolism and fat-free mass deposition.
The present study has some limitations. First, we included only healthy and clinically stable VLBWI, meaning the influences of comorbidities or complications on REE, body composition and substrate oxidation were not assessed. Furthermore, the evaluation of REE, body composition and substrate oxidation was performed only at discharge, meaning we did not investigate the influences of human milk on these variables over time.
The main strength of this paper is the large number of clinically stable VLBWI enrolled, which permitted us to obtain reliable data on REE, body composition and substrate oxidation under para-physiological conditions, without interference from other variables except the mode of feeding. Moreover, these data should prompt neonatal nutritional teams to provide adequate ratios of non-protein energy/grams of protein, in order to stimulate growth and fat-free mass deposition.
Further studies are necessary to evaluate the persistence of these modulating effects during the first months of life.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and P.R.; methodology, M.P., P.P. and C.M.; formal analysis, M.P., C.T. and D.M.; data curation, M.P. and D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P., C.M. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, C.T., N.L., P.R., P.P., C.M., D.M., A.O., O.A. and F.M.; supervision, F.M. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (protocol code 1314, 2nd emendament, date of approval 13 May 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clement, I. Nutritional Needs of Infants. Textb. Nutr. Diet. Post Basic BSc Nurs. Stud. 2015, 60, 395. [Google Scholar]
  2. Villar, J.; Giuliani, F.; Barros, F.; Roggero, P.; Zarco, C.I.A.; Rego, S.M.A.; Ochieng, R.; Gianni, M.L.; Rao, S.; Lambert, A.; et al. Monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants: A paradigm change. Pediatrics 2018, 141, e20172467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Villar, J.; Knight, H.E.; De Onis, M.; Bertino, E.; Gilli, G.; Papageorghiou, A.T.; Ismail, L.C.; Barros, F.C.; Bhutta, Z.A. Conceptual issues related to the construction of prescriptive standards for the evaluation of postnatal growth of preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 2010, 95, 1034–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tan, J.B.C.; Boskovic, D.S.; Angeles, D.M. The energy costs of prematurity and the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) experience. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Peila, C.; Spada, E.; Giuliani, F.; Maiocco, G.; Raia, M.; Cresi, F.; Bertino, E.; Coscia, A. Extrauterine growth restriction: Definitions and predictability of outcomes in a cohort of very low birth weight infants or preterm neonates. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Horbar, J.D.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Badger, G.J.; Edwards, E.M.; Morrow, K.A.; Soll, R.F.; Buzas, J.S.; Bertino, E.; Gagliardi, L.; Bellu’, R. Weight growth velocity and postnatal growth failure in infants 501 to 1500 Grams: 2000–2013. Pediatrics 2015, 136, e84–e92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hay, W.W.; Ziegler, E.E. Growth failure among preterm infants due to insufficient protein is not innocuous and must be prevented. J. Perinatol. 2016, 36, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Carriere, D.; Kantor, E.; Torchin, H.; Le Ray, C.; Jarreau, P.H.; Zana-Taieb, E. Mortality and morbidity of preterm neonates weighing less than 750 g: A 2-year retrospective cohort study. Arch. Pediatr. 2020, 27, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Brune, K.D.; Donn, S.M. Enteral feeding of the preterm infant. Neoreviews 2018, 19, e645–e653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Figueras-Aloy, J.; Palet-Trujols, C.; Matas-Barceló, I.; Botet-Mussons, F.; Carbonell-Estrany, X. Extrauterine growth restriction in very preterm infant: Etiology, diagnosis, and 2-year follow-up. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020, 179, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramel, S.E.; Gray, H.L.; Christiansen, E.; Boys, C.; Georgieff, M.K.; Demerath, E.W. Greater early gains in fat-free mass, but not fat mass, are associated with improved neurodevelopment at 1 year corrected age for prematurity in very low birth weight preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2016, 173, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cormack, B.E.; Harding, J.E.; Miller, S.P.; Bloomfield, F.H. The influence of early nutrition on brain growth and neurodevelopment in extremely preterm babies: A narrative review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Barouki, R.; Gluckman, P.D.; Grandjean, P.; Hanson, M.; Heindel, J.J. Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: Implications for research and public health. Environ. Health 2012, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Morlacchi, L.; Roggero, P.; Giannì, M.L.; Bracco, B.; Porri, D.; Battiato, E.; Menis, C.; Liotto, N.; Mallardi, D.; Mosca, F. Protein use and weight-gain quality in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants fed human milk or formula. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 107, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giannì, M.L.; Consonni, D.; Liotto, N.; Roggero, P.; Morlacchi, L.; Piemontese, P.; Menis, C.; Mosca, F. Does human milk modulate body composition in late preterm infants at term-corrected age? Nutrients 2016, 8, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Coss-Bu, J.A.; Jefferson, L.S.; Walding, D.; David, Y.; O’Brian Smith, E.; Klish, W.J. Resting energy expenditure in children in a pediatric intensive care unit: Comparison of Harris-Benedict and Talbot predictions with indirect calorimetry values. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 67, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Agostoni, C.; Edefonti, A.; Calderini, E.; Fossali, E.; Colombo, C.; Battezzati, A.; Bertoli, S.; Milani, G.P.; Bisogno, A.; Perrone, M.; et al. Accuracy of prediction formulae for the assessment of resting energy expenditure in hospitalized children. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2016, 63, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Leitch, C.A.; Denne, S.C. Energy expenditure in the extremely low-birth weight infant. Clin. Perinatol. 2000, 27, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perrone, M.; Mallardi, D.; Tabasso, C.; Bracco, B.; Menis, C.; Piemontese, P.; Amato, O.; Liotto, N.; Roggero, P.; Mosca, F. The indirect calorimetry in very low birth weight preterm infants: An easier and reliable procedure. Nutrition 2021, 86, 111180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Frayn, K.N. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 121, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Askanazi, J.; Carpentier, Y.A.; Elwyn, D.H.; Nördenström, J.; Jeevanandam, M.; Rosenbaum, S.H.; Gump, F.E.; Kinney, J.M. Influence of total parenteral nutrition on fuel utilization in injury and sepsis. Ann. Surg. 1980, 191, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stoner, H.B.; Little, R.A.; Frayn, K.N.; Elebute, A.E.; Tresadern, J.; Gross, E. The effect of sepsis on the oxidation of carbohydrate and fat. Br. J. Surg. 1983, 70, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Freymond, D.; Schutz, Y.; Decombaz, J.; Micheli, J.L.; Jéquier, E. Energy balance, physical activity, and thermogenic effect of feeding in premature infants. Pediatr. Res. 1986, 20, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Roggero, P.; Giannì, M.L.; Orsi, A.; Amato, O.; Piemontese, P.; Liotto, N.; Morlacchi, L.; Taroni, F.; Garavaglia, E.; Bracco, B.; et al. Implementation of Nutritional Strategies Decreases Postnatal Growth Restriction in Preterm Infants. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Agostoni, C.; Buonocore, G.; Carnielli, V.P.; De Curtis, M.; Darmaun, D.; Decsi, T.; Domellof, M.; Embleton, N.D.; Fusch, C.; Genzel-Boroviczeny, O.; et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: Commentary from the european society of paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition committee on nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010, 50, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Morlacchi, L.; Mallardi, D.; Giannì, M.L.; Roggero, P.; Amato, O.; Piemontese, P.; Consonni, D.; Mosca, F. Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Villar, J.; Giuliani, F.; Figueras-Aloy, J.; Barros, F.; Bertino, E.; A Bhutta, Z.; Kennedy, S.H. Growth of preterm infants at the time of global obesity. Arch. Dis. Child. 2019, 104, 725–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium. International Fetal and Newborn Growth Standards for the 21st Century Anthropometry Handbook; The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  29. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Available online: http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk (accessed on 21 September 2021).
  30. Weir, J.B.V. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J. Physiol. 1949, 109, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. McClave, S.A.; Lowen, C.C.; Kleber, M.J.; McConnell, J.W.; Jung, L.Y.; Goldsmith, L.J. Clinical use of the respiratory quotient obtained from indirect calorimetry. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2003, 27, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fell, J.M.E.; Thakkar, H.; Newman, D.J.; Price, C.P. Measurement of albumin and low molecular weight proteins in the urine of newborn infants using a cotton wool ball collection method. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 1997, 86, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roggero, P.; Giannì, M.L.; Amato, O.; Price, C. Evaluation of air-displacement plethysmography for body composition assessment in preterm infants. Pediatr. Res. 2012, 72, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Urlando, A.; Dempster, P.; Aitkens, S. A new air displacement plethysmograph for the measurement of body composition in infants. Pediatr. Res. 2003, 53, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fomon, S.J.; Haschke, F.; Ziegler, E.E.; Nelson, S.E. Body composition of reference children from birth to age 10 years. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1982, 35, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lubetzky, R.; Vaisman, N.; Mimouni, F.B.; Dollberg, S. Energy expenditure in human milk- versus formula-fed preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2003, 143, 750–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Larcade, J.; Pradat, P.; Buffin, R.; Leick-Courtois, C.; Jourdes, E.; Picaud, J.C. Estimation of fat-free mass at discharge in preterm infants fed with optimized feeding regimen. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, P.; Zhou, J.; Yin, Y.; Jing, W.; Luo, B.; Wang, J. Effects of breast-feeding compared with formula-feeding on preterm infant body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 116, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lönnerdal, B.; Erdmann, P.; Thakkar, S.K.; Sauser, J.; Destaillats, F. Longitudinal evolution of true protein, amino acids and bioactive proteins in breast milk: A developmental perspective. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Soares, F.V.M.; Abranches, A.D.; Méio, M.D.B.B.; Gomes, S.C.; Villela, L.D.; Moreira, M.E.L. Differences in energy expenditure in human donor milk versus formula milk in preterm newborns: A crossover study. Nutrition 2019, 66, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Putet, G.; Senterre, J.; Rigo, J.; Salle, B. Nutrient balance, energy utilization, and composition of weight gain in very-low-birth-weight infants fed pooled human milk or a preterm formula. J. Pediatr. 1984, 105, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Whyte, R.K.; Haslam, R.; Vlainic, C.; Shannon, S.; Samulski, K.; Campbell, D.; Bayley, H.S.; Sinclair, J.C. Energy balance and nitrogen balance in growing low birthweight infants fed human milk or formula. Pediatr. Res. 1983, 17, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brooke, O.G.; Wood, C.; Barley, J. Energy balance, nitrogen balance, and growth in preterm infants fed expressed breast milk, a premature infant formula, and two low-solute adapted formulae. Arch. Dis. Child. 1982, 57, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 13 03962 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart explaining the recruitment process. VLBWI, very low birth weight infants.
Figure 1. Flow chart explaining the recruitment process. VLBWI, very low birth weight infants.
Nutrients 13 03962 g001
Table
Table 1. Basic characteristics of subjects.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of subjects.
HMF (23)PFF (27)
MeanSDRangeMeanSDRangep
GA (weeks)30.092.02(25–32)30.331.44(26–33)ns
Birth weight (g)1280.22252.5(720–1490)1283.67159.3(890–1500)ns
Birth weight z-score−0.460.59(−1.27–0.88)−0.450.61(−1.27–0.87)ns
GA at IC (weeks)36.480.85(36–39)36.70.99(36–39)ns
Weight at IC (g)2156.22331.3(1800–3310)2251.26292.57(1861–2795)ns
Weight z-score at IC−0.970.86(−2.29–1.47)−0.840.88(−2.44–0.63)ns
GA, gestational age; IC, indirect calorimetry.
Table
Table 2. Nutritional intakes at IC.
Table 2. Nutritional intakes at IC.
HMF (23)PFF (27)
MeanSDRangeMeanSDRangep
Volume mL/kg/day152.4615.79(116.95–184)153.1414(125.99–182.92)ns
Energy kcal/kg/day126.6919.33(100.4–166.27)125.5512.37(105.4–158.75)ns
Protein g/kg/day3.340.72(2.14–4.66)3.470.46(2.59–4.39)ns
Carbohydrate g/kg/day13.181.91(10.22–16.55)13.31.74(9.25–15.91)ns
Lipid g/kg/day7.081.14(5.57–9.52)7.560.73(6.31–9.83)ns
Table
Table 3. REE and substrate oxidation.
Table 3. REE and substrate oxidation.
HMF (23)PFF (27)
MeanSDRangeMeanSDRangep
REE kcal/kg/day59.699.8(47.01–82.71)59.2713.15(45.42–105.09)ns
REE kcal/FFM(kg)day64.181.46(62.28–65.65)73.311.87(71.40–75.21)p < 0.001
RQ0.890.04(0.77–0.95)0.850.08(0.69–0.97)p < 0.05
Protein ox g/kg/day1.70.92(0.41–3.66)2.81.65(0.9–6.34)p < 0.01
Carbohydrate ox g/kg/day7.281.36(5.17–9.22)7.011.97(3.62–9.71)p = 0.56
Lipid ox g/kg/day1.270.37(0.51–1.82)1.250.49(0.45–2.05)ns
REE, resting energy expenditure; RQ, respiratory quotient; Ox, oxidation.
Table
Table 4. Body composition.
Table 4. Body composition.
HMF (23)PFF (27)
MeanSDRangeMeanSDRangep
FFM kg2.050.26(1.68–2.55)1.820.35(1.17–2.88)p < 0.01
FFM %88.023.93(80.40–94.90)84.914.12(78.45–89.48)p < 0.01
FM kg0.280.12(0.11–0.60)0.340.09(0.11–0.42)p < 0.05
FM %11.973.93(5.1–19.6)15.092.87(7.12–21.4)p < 0.01
FFM, fat-free mass; FM, fat mass.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perrone, M.; Menis, C.; Piemontese, P.; Tabasso, C.; Mallardi, D.; Orsi, A.; Amato, O.; Liotto, N.; Roggero, P.; Mosca, F. Energy Expenditure, Protein Oxidation and Body Composition in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3962. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113962

AMA Style

Perrone M, Menis C, Piemontese P, Tabasso C, Mallardi D, Orsi A, Amato O, Liotto N, Roggero P, Mosca F. Energy Expenditure, Protein Oxidation and Body Composition in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Nutrients. 2021; 13(11):3962. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perrone, Michela, Camilla Menis, Pasqua Piemontese, Chiara Tabasso, Domenica Mallardi, Anna Orsi, Orsola Amato, Nadia Liotto, Paola Roggero, and Fabio Mosca. 2021. "Energy Expenditure, Protein Oxidation and Body Composition in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants" Nutrients 13, no. 11: 3962. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113962

APA Style

Perrone, M., Menis, C., Piemontese, P., Tabasso, C., Mallardi, D., Orsi, A., Amato, O., Liotto, N., Roggero, P., & Mosca, F. (2021). Energy Expenditure, Protein Oxidation and Body Composition in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Nutrients, 13(11), 3962. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop