Next Article in Journal
Dietary Patterns of Adolescents from the Chilean Growth and Obesity Cohort Study Indicate Poor Dietary Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Associations of Eating Mode Defined by Dietary Patterns with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the Malaysia Lipid Study Population
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/nu12072085
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in a Large Newborn Cohort from Northern United States and Effect of Intrauterine Drug Exposure

by
Neelakanta Kanike
1,*,†,
Krupa Gowri Hospattankar
1,
Amit Sharma
2,
Sarah Worley
3 and
Sharon Groh-Wargo
1
1
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Case Western Reserve University, Metro Health Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA
2
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Memorial Hospital of Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
3
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, The Women’s Hospital-Deaconess, 4199 Gateway Blvd, Newburgh, IN 47630, USA.
Nutrients 2020, 12(7), 2085; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072085
Submission received: 7 June 2020 / Revised: 1 July 2020 / Accepted: 12 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Micronutrients and Human Health)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D is not only a vital element in bone health but is also a prohormone. Data regarding distribution of vitamin D status among preterm and term neonates in the United States are limited. There are no data on the effect of intrauterine drug exposure on vitamin D status. Our objective was to determine the distribution of vitamin D levels among preterm and term neonates and the effect of intrauterine illicit drug exposure. We did a retrospective chart review of neonates admitted from 2009 to 2016 to our neonatal intensive care unit with serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25[OH]D) levels measured during the hospital stay. Of 1517 neonates, the median 25[OH]D level was 19 ng/mL with 31% deficient and 49% insufficient, even though 75% of mothers took prenatal vitamins. In pregnant women, 38% were vitamin-D-deficient and 44% were vitamin-D-insufficient. Four hundred seventy-one neonates had intrauterine drug exposure, with a median 25[OH]D level of 22.9 ng/mL versus 17.8 ng/mL in nonexposed neonates (p = 0.001). Despite maternal prenatal vitamin intake, neonates are at risk of vitamin D deficiency. Maternal illicit drug use was not related to lower 25[OH]D levels in neonates.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D is not only a vital element in bone health but is also a prohormone that has an important role in other body systems. Vitamin D deficiency in neonates has been linked to a higher risk of respiratory distress syndrome, food sensitivities, asthma, type I diabetes, autism, schizophrenia, and lower respiratory infections [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25[OH]D), the best estimator of body vitamin D stores, crosses the placenta through passive or facilitated transport according to a concentration gradient [9,10]. Deficiency of vitamin D is a worldwide health concern that affects more than one billion kids and adults globally [11]. Vitamin D status in the fetus and newborn infant is largely determined by maternal vitamin D status [9]. Deficiency of vitamin D in pregnant women may affect fetal growth, bone ossification, and tooth enamel formation [12]. Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse outcomes like pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and low-birth-weight infants [13]. The main risk factor for vitamin D deficiency in neonates is maternal vitamin D deficiency [12]. In developed countries like the United States, vitamin D deficiency in neonates is emerging due to vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women [14,15]. Moreover, the data on the distribution of vitamin D status among the preterm population are limited.
In the last decade, illicit drug abuse in females of childbearing age has reached epidemic proportions in the USA [16,17,18]. It is known that people with substance use disorder typically suffer from nutrient deficiencies, and they have also been found to have altered hormonal metabolic regulators [19]. Drug abuse in pregnancy is related to numerous unfavorable outcomes for both mothers and infants, such as abruption of placenta, preterm delivery, cesarean section and prolonged hospitalization, and increased risk for maternal death [20]. For infants, maternal drug abuse in pregnancy is linked with prematurity, congenital anomalies, small size for gestational age, higher probability of pharmacological treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome, prolonged hospitalization, and greater risk for neurodevelopmental issues [21]. Although the negative effects of illicit drug use on the fetus and newborn are well-documented, their effect on vitamin D levels is still unknown [22]. We hypothesized that neonates with intrauterine drug exposure have lower 25[OH]D levels at birth compared to the general population and that premature neonates have lower 25[OH]D levels than term neonates.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a single-institution retrospective chart review study done at Metro-Health Medical Center, affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America (USA). The study cohort included neonates born between January 2009 and May 2016 with birth weight ≥1500 g and vitamin D levels measured during the hospital stay. Neonates with maternal history of disorder of the parathyroid glands, cholestasis of pregnancy, or maternal use of anti-retroviral drugs during pregnancy were excluded from the study.
Data regarding perinatal and postnatal characteristics were collected from the electronic health record system (Epic system corporation, US), including gender, gestational age, birth weight, race, 25[OH]D level, alkaline phosphatase level and type of intrauterine drug exposure. Serum 25[OH]D level was measured by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, which is the gold standard [23]. Maternal data including vitamin D levels, body mass index (BMI), and usage of prenatal vitamins were collected. For analysis, we classified women and neonates into 4 groups based on 25[OH]D levels: (a) vitamin D deficiency (<15 ng/mL), (b) vitamin D insufficiency (15–30 ng/mL), (c) vitamin D sufficiency (31–100 ng/mL), and (d) vitamin D toxicity (>100 ng/mL). We used a cutoff of 25[OH]D levels less than 15 ng/mL as vitamin D deficiency based on the clinical practice in our institution. The same cutoffs were used for both infants and mothers, as experts argue that there is no reason to think the definition of vitamin D sufficiency varies by age [24]. We did a pilot study at our institution to screen for vitamin D deficiency in 2008 and found that out of 183 infants, 51% had vitamin D insufficiency and 19% had deficiency. Based on recommendations from the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines, we developed a routine practice of measuring vitamin D levels at 24 to 48 h of life in our neonatal intensive care unit to identify infants with vitamin D deficiency and supplement them with 2000 IU ergocalciferol daily until the levels improved to a normal range (25[OH]D level >30 ng/mL) [25]. Metro-Health Medical Center’s institutional review board approved the study.

3. Statistical Methods

Data were presented using counts and percentages for categorical variables and medians, ranges, and quartiles for continuous variables. The vitamin D levels of subgroups were compared using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical characteristics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous and ordinal characteristics. The associations between vitamin D levels and other continuous clinical characteristics were assessed using non-parametric Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Linear regression models were used to compare drug-exposed to non-drug-exposed neonates and preterm to term newborn 25[OH]D levels at birth while adjusting for other maternal and infant characteristics. A subgroup analysis of infants was performed to assess the association between maternal BMI and infant vitamin D levels. All analyses were performed on a complete-case basis. All tests were two-tailed and used a significance level of 0.05. For all analyses, SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used.

4. Results

Of a total of 1517 neonates, 45% were term and 55% preterm. Table 1 shows descriptive data for our study cohort. The median gestational age was 36 weeks (30–42 weeks). The median birth weight was 2560 g (1500–4561 g), and males constituted 55% of the study population. Caucasian and African American (AA) neonates constituted 46% and 41%, respectively. Median 25[OH]D was 19 ng/mL (range, 3–223 ng/mL), with 31% being deficient and 49% being insufficient, even though 75% of mothers were on prenatal vitamins. In the vitamin-D-deficient group, 63% were AA and 27% were Caucasian (Table 2). Vitamin D levels were similar among preterm and term infants in our study cohort with a median 25[OH]D of 18.5 ng/mL and 18.9 ng/mL, respectively.
Intrauterine drug exposure was found in 471 neonates (31%). The most common illicit drugs were opioids and marijuana. Contrary to our hypothesis, the infants with intrauterine drug exposure had higher a median 25[OH]D level compared to nonexposed infants (22.9 ng/mL vs. 17.8 ng/mL, p = 0.001). On subgroup analysis, the levels were significantly higher in exposed infants among term and late-preterm groups (25.5 ng/mL vs. 16.8 ng/mL, p < 0.001, in term group; 21 ng/mL vs. 18.5 ng/mL, p = 0.01, in the late-preterm group) (Table 3).
Infant 25[OH]D levels were positively associated with mother 25[OH]D levels (0.64; 95% CI: 0.42–0.86; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with alkaline phosphatase (−0.13, 95% CI: −0.22 to −0.04; p < 0.003). The 25[OH]D values were not found to have a correlation with birth weight, gestational age, or maternal BMI (Table 4). During pregnancy, 38% women were vitamin D deficient and 44% insufficient, though our sample size was small (n = 52).

5. Discussion

Deficiency of vitamin D is the most common cause of rickets and is also known to increase the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, food sensitivities, asthma, type I diabetes, autism, schizophrenia, and lower respiratory infections [1,2,5,7,26]. Absorption of dietary calcium and phosphorus is prevented by vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D status in newborns is entirely dependent on maternal supply during pregnancy [10]. As expected, low maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy is a major risk factor for rickets in infants [12,27,28]. Rickets in children is caused by severe, chronic vitamin D deficiency with apparent skeletal abnormalities [29,30], but neonates with vitamin D insufficiency have no overt skeletal or calcium metabolism defects [24]. Rickets was a global disease in the early twentieth century but nearly disappeared in developed countries after its causal pathway was understood and fortification of milk with the hormone vitamin D was introduced at the population level [31]. Surprisingly, rickets is re-emerging per recent evidence [24,26], and vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in both developed and developing countries [26,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
In our cohort of neonates born in the Cleveland area (latitude 41 °N), we report a remarkably high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency at birth of 31% and 49%, respectively. We noticed poor vitamin D stores especially in neonates, even though 75% of mothers reported regular multivitamin intake during pregnancy. In our cohort, vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in African American (AA) neonates (63%) than Caucasian (27%) neonates. Our results are consistent with the study on 400 mother–infant dyads from Pittsburgh by Bodnar et al., who showed that nearly 50% of AA neonates and 10% of white neonates had serum 25[OH]D levels less than 15 ng/mL at birth despite adequate compliance with at least 400 IU vitamin D supplementation daily by 90% of their mothers [14]. A prolonged winter season with limited sun exposure in Cleveland might be contributing to the vitamin D deficiency.
Comparably, our results are also similar to a 1983 cross-sectional study by Hollis et al. on 10 AA and 12 Caucasian mothers who resided in the Cleveland area: serum 25[OH]D levels at term were lower in AA mothers (18.2 ± 12.1 ng/mL) than in white mothers (27.4 ± 8.7 ng/mL, p < 0.05) and were lower in AA neonates (9.5 ± 6.7 ng/mL) than in white neonates (14.9 ± 5.4 ng/mL, p < 0.05) [10]. We did not notice any substantial improvement in the vitamin D status among neonates born to AA women in the last 3 decades in the Cleveland area. A cross-sectional study by Merewood et al. from 2005 to 2007 in an urban Massachusetts area reported that 35.8% of mothers and 58% of neonates had vitamin D deficiency (25[OH]D <20 ng/mL); 23.1% of the mothers and 38.0% of the neonates had severe deficiency (25[OH]D <15 ng/mL). Risk factors for neonatal vitamin D deficiency were maternal vitamin D deficiency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.28), winter birth (aOR: 3.86), AA race (aOR: 3.36), and maternal BMI of 35 (aOR: 2.78) [39]. Contrary to their results, we did not find any significant correlation between infant vitamin D levels and maternal BMI in our study.
The strong association between maternal and infant 25[OH]D levels reported in our study offers further confirmation that newborn 25[OH]D levels are dependent on maternal serum 25[OH]D levels as reported in previous studies [10,39,40]. Pregnant women should take 600 IU vitamin D supplements daily, preferably as a combined preparation with other micronutrients such as iron and folic acid per global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets [41]. The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines also recommend at least 600 IU of vitamin D supplementation daily in pregnant and lactating women. They also acknowledge that 1500–2000 IU/day of vitamin D may be necessary to keep 25[OH]D levels >30 ng/mL [25]. However, average prenatal supplements contain only 400 IU of vitamin D [41].
Rostami et al. evaluated the usefulness of a prenatal screening program in improving vitamin D status through pregnancy. The outcome of their screening program was the prevention of pregnancy complications. They witnessed greater than a 25-fold increase in the number of mothers who were able to achieve a vitamin D level greater than 20 ng/mL once they were screened for their vitamin D levels and provided supplementation during pregnancy compared with mothers who were not screened and so were not instructed to take additional vitamin D supplements. They reported a significant decrease in pregnancy complications for mothers in the screened group: 60%, 50%, and 40% drops in pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and preterm delivery, respectively [42].
Presently, the data on the distribution of vitamin D levels in preterm neonates are limited. Few studies have reported vitamin D levels in neonates at birth, with sample sizes ranging from 8 to 223 neonates [1,43,44,45,46,47] and mean 25[OH]D levels ranging from ~6.5 ng/mL among preterm neonates in the United Arab Emirates [46] to 26.8 ng/mL among preterm neonates in Canada [48]. Our cohort had 832 preterm infants, the largest group reported to date. In contrast to the Boston group, in which preterm neonates had lower vitamin D levels, the Canada study and our study did not show any significant change in vitamin D status between term and preterm neonates [47,48].
Information about the effect of illicit drug use in pregnancy on the vitamin D levels in neonates is lacking in the literature. To date, this is the first study to look into the vitamin D status of neonates born to mothers with illicit drug use. The literature shows that people with drug use disorder typically suffer from nutrient deficiencies [19]. We expected lower vitamin D levels in the neonates born to women with illicit drug use due to poor nutrition during pregnancy, but the vitamin D levels of neonates with intrauterine drug exposure in our study cohort were not lower compared to nonexposed neonates; on the contrary, the levels were higher. The reason for this difference is not clear. Illicit drugs like marijuana, opiates, and cocaine may influence maternal–fetal transference of vitamin D. It is a novel relationship that needs further exploration.
This is the one of the largest studies on this topic in the United States with a cohort of 1517 neonates. Most of the similar studies used higher threshold cutoffs to define vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) compared to our study [15,39,49]. We used a level of 25[OH]D < 15 ng/mL for vitamin D deficiency based on the clinical practice in our institution. If we had used levels less than 20 ng/mL, the proportion of neonates in the vitamin-D-deficient group would have been even higher in our cohort.
We recognize some limitations in our study, including the small sample size of pregnant women with measured vitamin D levels, only 52 out of 1517, as the obstetrics team does not routinely screen for vitamin D status in women during pregnancy at our institution. As the number of mothers with their vitamin D levels checked was low, the correlation between newborn and maternal levels should be interpreted cautiously, although they are in the same direction as previously published works [50]. Our study population reflects the inner-city population in the Cleveland area of the Midwestern USA. The results cannot be generalized to the whole US population, although our study population is similar to most inner-city populations in major cities. Another limitation is lack of data on the duration and amount of illicit drug use, smoking and alcohol usage history, and nutritional intake of vitamin-D-fortified foods during pregnancy and the birth season. Future large, multicenter, prospective studies are required to know the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in developed countries like the USA and to determine factors that are related to vitamin D deficiency.

6. Conclusions

Our study results suggest that neonates born in the Northern US are at high risk of vitamin D deficiency, even when pregnant women are compliant with recommended prenatal vitamin intake. Current prenatal multivitamins do not contain sufficient vitamin D to prevent deficiency. Higher-dose vitamin D supplementation may be required to improve maternal and neonatal vitamin D status. Future studies are necessary to determine the minimum dose of vitamin D supplementation required during pregnancy to accomplish vitamin D sufficiency. Maternal illicit drug use was associated with significantly higher neonatal vitamin D levels. Further large studies are needed to show the effect of illicit drug use in pregnancy on neonatal vitamin D status. It is time to reconsider our approach to ensure vitamin D sufficiency in pregnant women and their infants.

Author Contributions

N.K. and S.G.-W. conceptualized and planned the study, prepared the initial manuscript, and revised the manuscript. S.W. devised the data collection equipment, conducted data analyses, and reviewed the manuscript. K.G.H. conceptualized and implemented the study, coordinated and collected the data sets, and critically reviewed the final draft of the manuscript. A.S. analytically reviewed and revised the final draft of the manuscript. All authors agree on the final manuscript as submitted and hold accountability for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have indicated no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. The authors have indicated they have no potential/perceived conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Mohamed Hegazy, A.; Mohamed Shinkar, D.; Refaat Mohamed, N.; Abdalla Gaber, H. Association between serum 25 (OH) vitamin D level at birth and respiratory morbidities among preterm neonates. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 2649–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Litonjua, A.A.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Weiss, S.T.; Gold, D.R.; Kleinman, K.; Gillman, M.W. Maternal intake of vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of recurrent wheeze in children at 3 y of age. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Ingham, T.; Wickens, K.; Thadhani, R.; Silvers, K.M.; Epton, M.J.; Town, G.I.; Pattemore, P.K.; Espinola, J.A.; Crane, J.; et al. Cord-blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of respiratory infection, wheezing, and asthma. Pediatrics 2011, 127, e180–e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Stene, L.C.; Joner, G.; Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Study, G. Use of cod liver oil during the first year of life is associated with lower risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: A large, population-based, case-control study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 78, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sorensen, I.M.; Joner, G.; Jenum, P.A.; Eskild, A.; Torjesen, P.A.; Stene, L.C. Maternal serum levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D during pregnancy and risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring. Diabetes 2012, 61, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. McGrath, J.; Saari, K.; Hakko, H.; Jokelainen, J.; Jones, P.; Jarvelin, M.R.; Chant, D.; Isohanni, M. Vitamin D supplementation during the first year of life and risk of schizophrenia: A Finnish birth cohort study. Schizophr. Res. 2004, 67, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.J.; Blanken, L.M.E.; Kruithof, C.J.; Verhulst, F.; White, T.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Tiemeier, H.; McGrath, J.J. Gestational vitamin D deficiency and autism spectrum disorder. BJPsych. Open 2017, 3, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.J.; Blanken, L.M.E.; Kruithof, C.J.; Verhulst, F.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Tiemeier, H.; McGrath, J.J. Gestational vitamin D deficiency and autism-related traits: The Generation R Study. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kovacs, C.S. Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: Maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 520S–528S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hollis, B.W.; Pittard, W.B., 3rd. Evaluation of the total fetomaternal vitamin D relationships at term: Evidence for racial differences. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1984, 59, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Holick, M.F. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Specker, B.L. Do North American women need supplemental vitamin D during pregnancy or lactation? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 59, 484S–491S, discussion 490S–491S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aghajafari, F.; Nagulesapillai, T.; Ronksley, P.E.; Tough, S.C.; O’Beirne, M.; Rabi, D.M. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2013, 346, f1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bodnar, L.M.; Simhan, H.N.; Powers, R.W.; Frank, M.P.; Cooperstein, E.; Roberts, J.M. High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in black and white pregnant women residing in the northern United States and their neonates. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Johnson, D.D.; Wagner, C.L.; Hulsey, T.C.; McNeil, R.B.; Ebeling, M.; Hollis, B.W. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is common during pregnancy. Am. J. Perinatol. 2011, 28, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rudd, R.A.; Aleshire, N.; Zibbell, J.E.; Gladden, R.M. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 64, 1378–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rudd, R.A.; Seth, P.; David, F.; Scholl, L. Increases in Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2010-2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2016, 65, 1445–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Shipton, E.A.; Shipton, E.E.; Shipton, A.J. A Review of the Opioid Epidemic: What Do We Do About It? Pain. Ther. 2018, 7, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jeynes, K.D.; Gibson, E.L. The importance of nutrition in aiding recovery from substance use disorders: A review. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 2017, 179, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maeda, A.; Bateman, B.T.; Clancy, C.R.; Creanga, A.A.; Leffert, L.R. Opioid abuse and dependence during pregnancy: Temporal trends and obstetrical outcomes. Anesthesiology 2014, 121, 1158–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Abdel-Latif, M.E.; Oei, J.; Craig, F.; Lui, K.; NSW; ACT NAS Epidemiology Group. Profile of infants born to drug-using mothers: A state-wide audit. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2013, 49, E80–E86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fang, S.Y.; Huang, N.; Tsay, J.H.; Chang, S.H.; Chen, C.Y. Excess mortality in children born to opioid-addicted parents: A national register study in Taiwan. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 2018, 183, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Holick, M.F. 25-OH-vitamin D assays. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 3128–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Holick, M.F. Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 2062–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P.; Murad, M.H.; Weaver, C.M.; Endocrine, S. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wharton, B.; Bishop, N. Rickets. Lancet 2003, 362, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeghoud, F.; Vervel, C.; Guillozo, H.; Walrant-Debray, O.; Boutignon, H.; Garabedian, M. Subclinical vitamin D deficiency in neonates: Definition and response to vitamin D supplements. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wagner, C.L.; Greer, F.R.; American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 2008, 122, 1142–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Markestad, T.; Halvorsen, S.; Halvorsen, K.S.; Aksnes, L.; Aarskog, D. Plasma concentrations of vitamin D metabolites before and during treatment of vitamin D deficiency rickets in children. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1984, 73, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pettifor, J.M. Rickets and vitamin D deficiency in children and adolescents. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2005, 34, 537–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Harrison, H.E. A tribute to the first lady of public health (Martha M. Eliot). V. The disappearance of rickets. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health 1966, 56, 734–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Calvo, M.S.; Whiting, S.J. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in Canada and the United States: Importance to health status and efficacy of current food fortification and dietary supplement use. Nutr. Rev. 2003, 61, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hanley, D.A.; Davison, K.S. Vitamin D insufficiency in North America. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D: A millenium perspective. J. Cell Biochem. 2003, 88, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holick, M.F. The vitamin D epidemic and its health consequences. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 2739S–2748S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumar, J.; Muntner, P.; Kaskel, F.J.; Hailpern, S.M.; Melamed, M.L. Prevalence and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in US children: NHANES 2001-2004. Pediatrics 2009, 124, e362–e370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sachan, A.; Gupta, R.; Das, V.; Agarwal, A.; Awasthi, P.K.; Bhatia, V. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns in northern India. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, C.; Gao, J.; Liu, N.; Yu, S.; Qiu, L.; Wang, D. Maternal factors associated with neonatal vitamin D deficiency. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 32, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Merewood, A.; Mehta, S.D.; Grossman, X.; Chen, T.C.; Mathieu, J.S.; Holick, M.F.; Bauchner, H. Widespread vitamin D deficiency in urban Massachusetts newborns and their mothers. Pediatrics 2010, 125, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, J.M.; Smith, J.R.; Philipp, B.L.; Chen, T.C.; Mathieu, J.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency in a healthy group of mothers and newborn infants. Clin. Pediatr. (Phila) 2007, 46, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Munns, C.F.; Shaw, N.; Kiely, M.; Specker, B.L.; Thacher, T.D.; Ozono, K.; Michigami, T.; Tiosano, D.; Mughal, M.Z.; Makitie, O.; et al. Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 394–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rostami, M.; Tehrani, F.R.; Simbar, M.; Bidhendi Yarandi, R.; Minooee, S.; Hollis, B.W.; Hosseinpanah, F. Effectiveness of Prenatal Vitamin D Deficiency Screening and Treatment Program: A Stratified Randomized Field Trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 2936–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Backstrom, M.C.; Maki, R.; Kuusela, A.L.; Sievanen, H.; Koivisto, A.M.; Ikonen, R.S.; Kouri, T.; Maki, M. Randomised controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation on bone density and biochemical indices in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 1999, 80, F161–F166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Delmas, P.D.; Glorieux, F.H.; Delvin, E.E.; Salle, B.L.; Melki, I. Perinatal serum bone Gla-protein and vitamin D metabolites in preterm and fullterm neonates. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 65, 588–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Salle, B.L.; Glorieux, F.H.; Delvin, E.E.; David, L.S.; Meunier, G. Vitamin D metabolism in preterm infants. Serial serum calcitriol values during the first four days of life. Acta Paediatr Scand 1983, 72, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dawodu, A.; Nath, R. High prevalence of moderately severe vitamin D deficiency in preterm infants. Pediatr. Int. 2011, 53, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Burris, H.H.; Van Marter, L.J.; McElrath, T.F.; Tabatabai, P.; Litonjua, A.A.; Weiss, S.T.; Christou, H. Vitamin D status among preterm and full-term infants at birth. Pediatr. Res. 2014, 75, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Morgan, C.; Dodds, L.; Langille, D.B.; Weiler, H.A.; Armson, B.A.; Forest, J.C.; Giguere, Y.; Woolcott, C.G. Cord blood vitamin D status and neonatal outcomes in a birth cohort in Quebec, Canada. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 293, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sethi, A.; Kochar, I.; Vij, V. Prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in cord blood. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.; Blanken, L.M.E.; Kruithof, C.J.; Verhulst, F.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Tiemeier, H.; McGrath, J.J. Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency based on maternal mid-gestation and neonatal cord bloods: The Generation R Study. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 164, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Maternal and infant descriptive data.
Table 1. Maternal and infant descriptive data.
VariablesNumber (%) Total: 1517
Gestational Age, Median (Min, Max)36(30,42)
Gestational age
 Term (≥37 weeks)685(45)
 Preterm (<37 weeks)832(55)
Groups Based on Birth Gestation
 Early Preterm (<34 weeks)335(22)
 Late Preterm (34–36 weeks)497(33)
 Term (≥37 weeks)685(45)
Gender
 Male830(55)
Ethnicity
 Caucasian692(46)
 African American626(41)
Birth Weight, Median (Min, Max)2559(1500,4561)
Size
 SGA—Small for Gestational Age185(12)
 AGA—Appropriate for Gestational Age1191(79)
 LGA—Large for Gestational Age97(6)
Vitamin D Level, Median (Min, Max)19(3,223)
Vitamin D Level, 25[OH]D
 Deficiency (<15 ng/mL)476(31)
 Insufficiency (15–30 ng/mL)747(49)
 Sufficiency (31–100 ng/mL)288(19)
 Toxicity (>100 ng/mL)4(0.3)
Alkaline Phosphatase Level Available489(32)
Alkaline Phosphatase Level, Median (Min, Max)175(22,697)
Maternal Drug Exposure471(31)
 Opiate210(14)
 Marijuana156(10)
 Cocaine65(4)
 Benzodiazepine10(0.7)
 Polydrug Use133(28)
Prenatal Vitamin1133(75)
Mothers with Vitamin D Level52(4)
Mother’s 25[OH]D level, Median (Min, Max)18(4,64)
Mother’s Vitamin D Level, 25[OH]D
 Deficiency (<15 ng/mL)20(38)
 Insufficiency (15–30 ng/mL)23(44)
 Sufficiency (31–100 ng/mL)9(17)
Data shown as number (%) unless otherwise stated.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics by vitamin D status.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics by vitamin D status.
Variable, N (%)Deficiency (N = 476)Insufficiency (N = 747)Sufficiency (N = 288)Toxicity (N = 4)
Gender: Male252 (53)421 (51)154 (19)2 (0.2)
Ethnicity:
 Caucasian130 (27)366 (53)192 (28)3 (0.4)
 African American302 (63)258 (41)64 (10)1 (0.2)
Birth Gestation:
 Early Preterm (<34 w)107 (32)178 (53)50 (15)0 (0)
 Late Preterm (34–36 w)155 (31)251 (51)89 (18)1 (0.2)
 Term (≥37 w)214 (31)318 (46)149 (22)3 (0.4)
Mother’s BMI, Median (Q1, Q3)30 (24,39)27 (23,33)28 (25,33)28 (28,28)
Prenatal Vitamin361 (76)540 (72)228 (79)3 (75)
Mother’s Vitamin D Level Median (Q1, Q3)9 (9,15)22 (15,29)25 (20,31)----
Mothers Drug Exposure113 (24)210 (28)143 (50)3 (75)
 Opiate47 (42)99 (47)62 (43)2 (66)
 Marijuana60 (53)77 (37)18 (13)0 (0)
 Cocaine16 (14)37 (18)12 (8)0 (0)
 Benzodiazepine3 (3)5 (2)2 (1)0 (0)
BMI: body mass index.
Table
Table 3. Neonatal vitamin D level by maternal drug exposure within age groups.
Table 3. Neonatal vitamin D level by maternal drug exposure within age groups.
Gestational Age Group Intrauterine Illicit Drug ExposureNumber of SubjectsVitamin D Level (ng/mL) Median (P25, P75)p Value
All Neonates Yes46922.9 (15, 33.2)<0.001
No104517.8 (13, 24.7)
Term Neonates (≥37 weeks) Yes23425.5 (15.9, 35)<0.001
No44916.8 (12.4, 24)
Late Preterm (34–36 weeks) Yes15121 (14,33)0.010
No34518.5 (13.7, 24.8)
Early Preterm (<34 weeks) Yes8419.7 (14.1, 29)0.22
No25118.6 (13.3, 25.4)
Table
Table 4. Association of continuous characteristics with infant vitamin D levels. *
Table 4. Association of continuous characteristics with infant vitamin D levels. *
CharacteristicsNSpearman Correlation Coefficient95% CIp Value
Neonate Alkaline Phosphatase489−0.13(−0.22,−0.04)0.003
Birth Weight15150(−0.05,0.05)0.98
Gestational Age 15150.02(−0.04,0.07)0.55
Maternal Vitamin D Level520.64(0.42,0.86)<0.001
Maternal BMI232−0.03(−0.16,0.10)0.63
* Correlation coefficients >0 indicate a positive association between 25[OH]D and the characteristic (higher levels of one are correlated with higher levels of the other), and correlation coefficients <0 indicate a negative association between 25[OH]D and the characteristic (higher levels of one are associated with lower levels of the other); CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanike, N.; Hospattankar, K.G.; Sharma, A.; Worley, S.; Groh-Wargo, S. Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in a Large Newborn Cohort from Northern United States and Effect of Intrauterine Drug Exposure. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072085

AMA Style

Kanike N, Hospattankar KG, Sharma A, Worley S, Groh-Wargo S. Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in a Large Newborn Cohort from Northern United States and Effect of Intrauterine Drug Exposure. Nutrients. 2020; 12(7):2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanike, Neelakanta, Krupa Gowri Hospattankar, Amit Sharma, Sarah Worley, and Sharon Groh-Wargo. 2020. "Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in a Large Newborn Cohort from Northern United States and Effect of Intrauterine Drug Exposure" Nutrients 12, no. 7: 2085. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop