Next Article in Journal
Low Levels of Vitamin D Promote Memory B Cells in Lupus
Previous Article in Journal
Micronutrient Supplementation and Fortification Interventions on Health and Development Outcomes among Children Under-Five in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Blackcurrant Supplementation Modified Gut Microbiome Profiles in Mice in an Age-Dependent Manner: An Exploratory Study

1
Institute of Marine Life Sciences, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
2
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
3
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
4
Microbial Analysis, Resources and Services (MARS), University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2020, 12(2), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020290
Submission received: 12 December 2019 / Revised: 4 January 2020 / Accepted: 20 January 2020 / Published: 21 January 2020

Abstract

:
Recent studies have suggested that blackcurrant (BC) anthocyanins have promising health benefits, possibly through regulating gut microbiome. Three- and eighteen-month old female mice were fed standard mouse diets for 4 months, each with or without BC (1% w/w) supplementation (n = 3 in each treatment group, 12 in total). We then assessed gut microbiome profiles using 16S sequencing of their feces. Old mice had a less diverse microbiome community compared to young mice and there was a remarkable age-related difference in microbiome composition in the beta diversity analysis. BC supplementation did not significantly affect alpha or beta diversity. The relative abundance of several phyla, including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Tenericutes, was lower in old mice. BC downregulated Firmicutes abundance in young mice and upregulated Bacteroidetes in both age groups, leading to a decreased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. There were age-specific differences in the effect of BC supplementation on the microbiome. Twenty-four operational taxonomic units showed a significant interaction between age and BC supplementation (p < 0.01), which suggests that the ecosystem and the host health status affect the functions and efficiency of BC intake. These results indicate that BC supplementation favorably modulates gut microbiome, but there are distinct age-specific differences. Studies with human hosts are needed to better understand BC’s regulatory effects on the gut microbiome.

1. Introduction

Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum, BC) has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that aid in the protection against cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases as well as diabetes [1,2]. Additionally, BC’s modulation of microbial populations has recently garnered attention: an in vitro study demonstrated that BC extract suppressed the growth of E. coli strains [3]; in rats, BC extract stimulated the growth of bifidobacteria and suppressed the growth of bacteroides and clostridia [4].
Anthocyanins are a group of major bioactive compounds of BC and may be the key regulator of its microbial-modulating properties. In particular, diglycosidic anthocyanins, including delphinidin-3-rutinoside and cyanidin-3-rutinoside, are the major anthocyanins constituents in BC [5]. Anthocyanins belong to the polyphenolic class of flavonoids and are glycosides of polyhydroxy and polymethoxy derivatives of 2-phenylbenzopyrylium or flavylium salt [6]. Anthocyanins are distinguished by the number of hydroxyl groups they possess, the degree of methylation of these hydroxyl groups, and the nature, number and position of sugar moieties attached, as well as the nature and number of aliphatic or aromatic acids attached to the sugars [6]. The majority of dietary anthocyanins are not absorbed at the upper gastrointestinal level so the unabsorbed anthocyanins reach the intestinal microbiome where they are metabolized and absorbed [7] via cleavage of glycosidic linkages and breakdown of anthocyanidin heterocycle [8]. This promotes the colonization of bacteria containing the requisite enzymes such as β-glucosidase that are necessary to catalyze the cleavage and breakdown reactions of anthocyanins [7]. In particular, mono- and diglycosidic anthocyanins are major targets of colonic microbiota [9].
Anthocyanins partly exert their health benefits through modulation of the gut microbiome. Specifically, the anti-inflammatory effect of anthocyanins may involve their interaction with the local microbiome and their functions in the intestine [10]. One study found that BC supplementation improved glucose metabolism only in diet-induced obese mice with an intact gut microbiome and not in mice with a disrupted gut microbiome [11], lending support to the notion that the gut microbiome plays a key role in mediating anthocyanins’ anti-inflammatory properties. Thus, the potential interactions between BC and the gut microbiome might be important to the overall health of their hosts.
It is now increasingly evident that young and aged hosts have different gut microbiome profiles [12,13,14]. Considering this age-related difference, BC supplementation may affect the gut microbiome of young and aged mice differently. Therefore, in this study we used 3-month and 18-month old female mice, corresponding to the human ages of 20 and 56 years old, respectively. These ages are considered as mature adult and old, respectively [15]; and for the purposes of this study, the mature adult mice were referred to as “young” to contrast the 18-month old mice (“old”). After 4 months’ dietary intervention, they became 7 and 22 months old, which corresponds to the human ages of approximately 34 and 65 years old, respectively. We observed the microbiome composition changes in response to long-term BC supplementation and aimed to shed light on how BC supplementation exerts its health benefits through regulating the host gut microbiome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Diets

This study was conducted concurrently with a recently published study on the effects of BC on bone mass among young and old female mice, in which the experimental design, chemicals and animal preparations were described [16]. Young (3 months old) and old (18 months old) female C57BL/6J mice (purchased from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were randomized to consume either a standard chow diet (AIN-93M diet from Dyets, Bethlehem, PA, USA) or a standard chow diet mixed with 1% (w/w) BC extract, which was provided by Just the Berries Ltd. (Palmerston North, New Zealand). As shown in Table 1, the BC extract contained not less than 30% of anthocyanins, and delphinidin-3-rutinoside and cyanidin-3-rutinoside were the major anthocyanin derivatives as analyzed in our previous research [5]. There were four groups, each with three mice: (1) Young Control, (2) Young BC, (3) Old Control, and (4) Old BC. After 4 months of feeding, individual fecal contents were collected from the colon directly and immediately stored in a −80 °C freezer for further processing. Body weight and food consumption were recorded weekly. All the procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee from the University of Connecticut and the University of Connecticut Health Center (protocol #100829-0117, approved 11/16/2015).

2.2. DNA Extraction PCR Amplification and Sequencing of Taxonomic Marker

Fecal samples were submitted to the University of Connecticut-Storrs Microbial Analysis, Resources and Services facility for microbiota characterization utilizing 16S V4 analysis. DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of fecal sample using the MoBio PowerMag Soil 96 well kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for the Eppendorf epMotion liquid handling robot. DNA extracts were quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen kit (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Partial bacterial 16S rRNA genes (V4, 0.8 picomole each 515F and 806R with Illumina adapters and 8 basepair dual indices (Kozich 2013)) were amplified in triplicate 15 uL reactions using GoTaq (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with the addition of 10 µg BSA (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). To overcome initial primer binding inhibition because the majority of the primers do not match the template priming site, we added 0.1 femtomole 515F and 806R that did not have barcodes and adapters. The PCR reaction was incubated at 95 °C for 2 min, the 30 cycles of 30 s at 95.0 °C, 60 s at 50.0 °C and 60 s at 72.0 °C, followed by final extension as 72.0 °C for 10 min. PCR products were pooled for quantification and visualization using the QIAxcel DNA Fast Analysis (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR products were normalized based on the concentration of DNA from 350–420 bp then pooled using the QIAgility liquid handling robot. The pooled PCR products were cleaned using the Mag-Bind RxnPure Plus (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cleaned pool was sequenced on the MiSeq using v2 2 × 250 base pair kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3. Sequence Data Processing

Sequences were demultiplexed using onboard bcl2fastq. Demultiplexed sequences were processed in Mothur v. 1.39.4 following the MiSeq SOP [17] Exact commands can be found here: https://github.com/krmaas/bioinformatics/blob/master/mothur.batch. Merged sequences that had any ambiguities or did not meet length expectations were removed. Sequences were aligned to the Silva nr_v119 alignment [18]. Taxonomic identification of operational taxonomic units (OTU)s was done to classify groups of closely related individuals using the Ribosomal Database Project Bayesian classifier [19] against the Silva nr_v119 taxonomy database.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The OTU reads and taxonomy table were imported into R version 3.6.1 and all statistical analyses were performed using the phyloseq and vegan packages unless noted otherwise. The alpha diversity was measured by several diversity indices (observed species, Shannon diversity index, and inverse Simpson diversity index). A comparison was performed using two-way ANOVA. The beta diversity was assessed by weighted and unweighted UniFrac analysis. The difference was tested using PERMANOVA. Phylum abundance differences and OTU abundance differences among groups were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with post hoc comparisons (Bonferroni). The significance level for phylum difference was set at 0.05, while the OTU difference was set at 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Age and BC Modified the Gut Microbial Community Composition

Discovered sequences were classified into 11 phyla, 26 classes, 46 orders, 74 families, and 116 genera. There were 1220 total OTUs discovered, and 719, 540, 344 and 330 OTUs in the young control, young BC, old control, and old BC groups, respectively (Figure 1). Old female mice had a less diverse microbial community composition compared to the young mice (Two-way ANOVA p < 0.0001 for species observed and Shannon diversity index; p = 0.001 for inverse Simpson diversity), whereas 4-month BC administration did not have a significant impact on their species richness (p = 0.21 for species observed, 0.41 for Shannon diversity index, and 0.31 for inverse Simpson diversity).
In the beta diversity analysis (Figure 2), samples were well separated by age using both weighted UniFrac (PERMANOVA p value < 0.001) and unweighted UniFrac (PERMANOVA p  <  0.001). Samples with different diets were roughly separated using weighted UniFrac (PERMANOVA p = 0.06) and unweighted UniFrac (PERMANOVA p = 0.08). In both weighted and unweighted UniFrac, Principal coordinate 1 (PC1) (percent variation explained: 34% in unweight and 66% in weighted) separates samples with different ages, while PC2 (11.7% in unweighted and 15% in weighted) roughly separates the mice fed different diets.

3.2. Age and BC Modified the Phylum Composition in Mice

The phylum composition analysis is shown in Figure 3A. For clearer illustration, only the five most abundant phyla were included in this figure, which were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Deferribacteres, and Proteobacteria. The abundance analysis of each phylum is shown in Figure 3B–G. According to the ANOVA results, several phyla showed an age-related decrease (p < 0.05), including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Tenericutes. In contrast, we saw an age-related increase of Verrucomicrobia (p < 0.0001). Exclusively of the genera Akkermansia, Verrucomicrobia phylum became the most dominant phylum in the old mice. BC also decreased the abundance of Verrucomicrobia in the old mice. Firmicutes, the most dominant phylum in the young mice, was suppressed by BC administration in the young mice but not in the old counterparts. The abundance of Bacteroidetes was increased by BC administration in both the young and old mice. After comparing the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio, a significantly lower F/B ratio was seen in BC-fed mice than the control mice (p = 0.0093).

3.3. Age and BC Modified the Abundance of OTUs

There were 46 OTUs whose relative abundance differed between the young and old mice (p < 0.01; Table 2). Among the 46 OTUs, 40 decreased in old mice, while six increased in old mice. Twenty-three out of the 40 OTUs came from the Lachnospiraceae and Rumicococcaceae families. From the same families, three OTUs showed an age-related increase. Twelve OTUs from the Bacteroidales order had lower relative abundance in old mice than the young ones, while one OTU showed higher abundance in old than in young mice.
The relative abundance of eight OTUs were modified by BC supplementation (Table 3). Interestingly, all of them came from the Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae families. However, BC promoted the growth of four of them and suppressed the growth of the other four. After comparing the OTUs modified by age and the OTUs modified by BC, we found that only one OTU, from the family Lachnospiraceae changed by both BC and age. Aging modified the abundance of OTUs six times more than BC did, which was consistent with the patterns observed from the beta diversity analysis. These results indicate that age plays a paramount role in regulating gut microbiome.
There were 21 OTUs whose relative abundance had a significant interaction effect between BC and age (Table 4). To better illustrate the interaction between BC and age on gut microbiome, a heat map with the OTUs with significant interaction was created (Supplementary Figure S1). A majority of the 18 OTUs came from the families of Lachnospiracear and Ruminococcaceae. Of the 21 OTUs, 16 showed significant sensitivity to both BC and age. However, due to the significant interaction, they are not included in the previous tables.

4. Discussion

Anthocyanin-rich BC possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that protect against certain chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease [1]. These health benefits are likely attributed to the anthocyanins’ interaction with the gut microbiome, at least in part. In vitro and in vivo studies showed that BC or bioactive compounds from BC promoted or inhibited the growth of certain bacterial species [3,20]. For instance, consumption of BC extract powder enhanced the growth of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria but suppressed the abundance of Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp. in healthy humans [21]. These studies, which focused on specific bacteria, provide evidence supporting BC’s regulation of the gut microbiome. Through investigating how the host gut microbiome changes in response to BC, we hope to have a better understanding of the health benefits of BC.
To our knowledge, this was the first study to compare the alpha diversity of the gut microbiome from young and old female mice. The alpha diversity analysis of the microbiome profile showed that old mice had a less diverse gut microbiome community. While we observed a remarkable decrease in alpha diversity in old female mice, others observed age-related increases in alpha diversity in males [22,23,24]. Previous studies have observed sex-specific differences in gut microbiome composition and response to diet intervention in hamsters and mice [25,26]. Taken together, it is readily apparent that sex should be considered when comparing results related to alpha diversity across sexes. The beta diversity analysis showed that aging plays a paramount role in regulating the structure of the gut microbiome, which has been reported previously [14,27]. The results also showed that the composition of the gut microbiome tended to differ in response to BC supplementation. However, this effect was not statistically significant in our study, which may be attributed to the small sample size.
In the young mice, BC supplementation significantly increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum while decreasing the Firmicutes phylum. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are two major phyla of gut microbiome [28]. The increased F/B ratio has been found to positively correlate with multiple chronic health disorders of the host, such as obesity, diabetes, and osteoporosis, although the mechanisms are unclear [29,30,31,32]. Well known health promoting phytochemicals such as green tea and black tea polyphenols may regulate host health through promoting the growth of Bacteroides while suppressing the growth of Firmicutes [33]. Another study also showed that pomegranate peel extract treatment for 14 days significantly reduced F/B ratio in mice [34]. In our study, we also observed a significantly lower F/B ratio in BC-fed mice than the control mice. Based on these abundance changes of Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes in the fecal sample, this study provides evidence that long-term BC supplementation alters the composition of the gut microbiome by reducing the F/B ratio, resulting in a gut environment that is more protective against certain chronic diseases.
Another interesting finding is that Verrucomicrobia phylum, exclusively of the genera Akkermansia, became the most dominant phylum in the old mice. BC also decreased the abundance of Verrucomicrobia in the old mice. The abundance change of phylum Verrucomicrobia with age was also seen in another female mouse study [14]. Furthermore, the enriched Akkermansia in the long-living groups compared to young counterparts was observed in humans [35]. The physiological role of Verrucomicrobia is not well studied. However, Verrucomicrobia was found to be more abundant in colonic content and feces from immunodeficient female Rag1-/- mice compared to wild-type mice [36], which suggests that this phylum may be related to the compromised host immune status. Furthermore, members of this genus exacerbate gut inflammation in Salmonella Typhimurium-infected mice [37]. All these suggest that the increased abundance of this bacterium may indicate that the host is more vulnerable to inflammation. BC’s suppressive effect on Verrucomicrobia may relate with BC’s anti-inflammatory effect. In another study conducted with female mice, a high-fat diet also caused a sharp increase of Verrucomicrobia, which became the most dominant phylum [38]. Including our findings, it is noticeable that most Verrucomicrobia changes were observed in female hosts. The sex difference of Verrucomicrobia may be more critical than we expected.
When we analyzed the changes of microbiome at the OTU level, we found almost six times more OTUs modified by age than by BC. This is consistent with the beta diversity analysis, which showed a more profound effect from age than from BC on microbiome structure. The majority of the OTUs modified by age and all the OTUs mofied by BC were from two families, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. These two families are two of the most abundant families from the Clostridiales order in the mammalian gut environment and they serve as active plant degraders [39]. A study found that Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae abundance correlates with innate and acquired immunity [40]. These bacteria decompose the fiber, such as cellulose and hemicellulose components of consumed plant, and convert them into short chain fatty acids for absorption [39,40]. BC alters the composition of these fiber-degrading bacteria, which suggests that BC’s fiber content may play an important role in shaping the gut microbiome. However, different genera and OTUs showed different responses to age and BC. This suggests that the changes are more complicated than pure fiber-degrading; it may not be appropriate to combine and analyze the environmental effect at family level. The proliferative effects of the anthocyanins on Bifidobacteria (B. bifidum, B. adolescents and B. infantis) and Lactobacillus (L. acidophilus) under in vitro fermentation condition were reported recently [41]. However, we did not see any OTUs from these two genera change their abundance by BC supplementation. This may be due to the more complicated ecosystem in the host gut than the simple in vitro condition. Additionally, Bifidobacterial from the Actinobacteria phylum composed a very small fraction of the microbiome in our samples. The Lactobacillales order was also less predominant compared to the Cloristridiales order.
When we compared OTUs regulated by age and regulated by BC, only one OTU showed sensitivity to both factors. However, 21 OTUs showed a significant interaction between age and BC, among which 15 OTUs were also modified by both age and BC. This suggests that the gut microbiome responded differently to the BC supplementation in young and old mice, which corroborates with Zhu et al.’s findings that there are age-specific differences in gut microbiome in response to diet [42]. The food intake record showed a food intake difference between young and old mice in our previous study [16]. This result indicates that the supplemented BC intake was also different between young and old mice. Thus, the different intake of BC between young and old mice may also contribute to the 21 OTUs which showed significant interactions between age and BC.
Overall, the results suggest that long-term BC supplementation shapes the gut microbiome in female mice in an age-dependent manner. However, the limited sample size in this study makes the results exploratory in nature and future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to corroborate our discoveries. It is generally understood that the aging process changes the gut microbiome profiles; however, it is not well understood how dietary interventions affect the intestinal ecosystem. Future studies investigating the prebiotic function of foods such as BC should include populations from different ages and sexes to have a more comprehensive understanding of their benefits. Human hosts are also needed to provide more insight and relevance to humans on the microbiome-regulating effects of BC.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/2/290/s1, Figure S1: A heat map illustration with the OTUs about the interaction between BC and age on gut microbiome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: O.K.C.; data curation: S.G.L., L.C., K.R.M.; formal analysis: S.G.L., L.C., J.R.S., M.M.M.; project administration: O.K.C.; supervision: S.I.K., O.K.C.; writing—original draft: L.C., S.G.L; writing—review and editing: L.C., S.G.L., J.R.S., M.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the USDA NIFA Seed Grant (#2016-67018-24492) and the University of Connecticut Foundation Esperance Funds to O.K.C.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institute on Aging for providing aged mice for the project and Just the Berries Ltd. for providing the blackcurrant extract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gopalan, A.; Reuben, S.C.; Ahmed, S.; Darvesh, A.S.; Hohmann, J.; Bishayee, A. The health benefits of blackcurrants. Food Funct. 2012, 3, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, B.; Lee, S.G.; Park, Y.K.; Ku, C.S.; Pham, T.X.; Wegner, C.J.; Yang, Y.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K.; Lee, J.Y. Blueberry, blackberry, and blackcurrant differentially affect plasma lipids and pro-inflammatory markers in diet-induced obesity mice. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2016, 10, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Puupponen-Pimia, R.; Nohynek, L.; Meier, C.; Kahkonen, M.; Heinonen, M.; Hopia, A.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.M. Antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds from berries. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 90, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Molan, A.-L.; Liu, Z.; Kruger, M. The ability of blackcurrant extracts to positively modulate key markers of gastrointestinal function in rats. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1735–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, S.G.; Vance, T.M.; Nam, T.G.; Kim, D.O.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K. Contribution of Anthocyanin Composition to Total Antioxidant Capacity of Berries. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2015, 70, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kong, J.M.; Chia, L.S.; Goh, N.K.; Chia, T.F.; Brouillard, R. Analysis and biological activities of anthocyanins. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Faria, A.; Fernandes, I.; Norberto, S.; Mateus, N.; Calhau, C. Interplay between anthocyanins and gut microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6898–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aura, A.M.; Martin-Lopez, P.; O’Leary, K.A.; Williamson, G.; Oksman-Caldentey, K.M.; Poutanen, K.; Santos-Buelga, C. In vitro metabolism of anthocyanins by human gut microflora. Eur. J. Nutr. 2005, 44, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eker, M.E.; Aaby, K.; Budic-Leto, I.; Brncic, S.R.; El, S.N.; Karakaya, S.; Simsek, S.; Manach, C.; Wiczkowski, W.; Pascual-Teresa, S. A Review of Factors Affecting Anthocyanin Bioavailability: Possible Implications for the Inter-Individual Variability. Foods 2019, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rechner, A.R.; Kuhnle, G.; Bremner, P.; Hubbard, G.P.; Moore, K.P.; Rice-Evans, C.A. The metabolic fate of dietary polyphenols in humans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Esposito, D.; Damsud, T.; Wilson, M.; Grace, M.H.; Strauch, R.; Li, X.; Lila, M.A.; Komarnytsky, S. Black Currant Anthocyanins Attenuate Weight Gain and Improve Glucose Metabolism in Diet-Induced Obese Mice with Intact, but Not Disrupted, Gut Microbiome. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 6172–6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ke, S.; Fang, S.; He, M.; Huang, X.; Yang, H.; Yang, B.; Chen, C.; Huang, L. Age-based dynamic changes of phylogenetic composition and interaction networks of health pig gut microbiome feeding in a uniformed condition. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bartley, J.M.; Zhou, X.; Kuchel, G.A.; Weinstock, G.M.; Haynes, L. Impact of Age, Caloric Restriction, and Influenza Infection on Mouse Gut Microbiome: An Exploratory Study of the Role of Age-Related Microbiome Changes on Influenza Responses. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Langille, M.G.; Meehan, C.J.; Koenig, J.E.; Dhanani, A.S.; Rose, R.A.; Howlett, S.E.; Beiko, R.G. Microbial shifts in the aging mouse gut. Microbiome 2014, 2, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Flurkey, K.; Currer, J.M.; Harrison, D. Mouse models in aging research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 637–672. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sakaki, J.; Melough, M.; Lee, S.G.; Kalinowski, J.; Koo, S.I.; Lee, S.K.; Chun, O.K. Blackcurrant Supplementation Improves Trabecular Bone Mass in Young but Not Aged Mice. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kozich, J.J.; Westcott, S.L.; Baxter, N.T.; Highlander, S.K.; Schloss, P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Werlein, H.-D.; Kütemeyer, C.; Schatton, G.; Hubbermann, E.; Schwarz, K. Influence of elderberry and blackcurrant concentrates on the growth of microorganisms. Food Control 2005, 16, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Molan, A.L.; Liu, Z.; Plimmer, G. Evaluation of the effect of blackcurrant products on gut microbiota and on markers of risk for colon cancer in humans. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abrahamsson, T.R.; Jakobsson, H.E.; Andersson, A.F.; Bjorksten, B.; Engstrand, L.; Jenmalm, M.C. Low gut microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2014, 44, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hoffman, J.D.; Parikh, I.; Green, S.J.; Chlipala, G.; Mohney, R.P.; Keaton, M.; Bauer, B.; Hartz, A.M.S.; Lin, A.L. Age Drives Distortion of Brain Metabolic, Vascular and Cognitive Functions, and the Gut Microbiome. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mihajlovski, A.; Dore, J.; Levenez, F.; Alric, M.; Brugere, J.F. Molecular evaluation of the human gut methanogenic archaeal microbiota reveals an age-associated increase of the diversity. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sylvia, K.E.; Jewell, C.P.; Rendon, N.M.; St John, E.A.; Demas, G.E. Sex-specific modulation of the gut microbiome and behavior in Siberian hamsters. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 60, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Org, E.; Mehrabian, M.; Parks, B.W.; Shipkova, P.; Liu, X.; Drake, T.A.; Lusis, A.J. Sex differences and hormonal effects on gut microbiota composition in mice. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Thevaranjan, N.; Puchta, A.; Schulz, C.; Naidoo, A.; Szamosi, J.C.; Verschoor, C.P.; Loukov, D.; Schenck, L.P.; Jury, J.; Foley, K.P.; et al. Age-Associated Microbial Dysbiosis Promotes Intestinal Permeability, Systemic Inflammation, and Macrophage Dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scott, K.P.; Gratz, S.W.; Sheridan, P.O.; Flint, H.J.; Duncan, S.H. The influence of diet on the gut microbiota. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 69, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koliada, A.; Syzenko, G.; Moseiko, V.; Budovska, L.; Puchkov, K.; Perederiy, V.; Gavalko, Y.; Dorofeyev, A.; Romanenko, M.; Tkach, S.; et al. Association between body mass index and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in an adult Ukrainian population. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ley, R.E.; Backhed, F.; Turnbaugh, P.; Lozupone, C.A.; Knight, R.D.; Gordon, J.I. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11070–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, W.; Wang, B.; Zhao, H.; Zeng, Y.; Ji, Y.; Hao, D. Diversity analysis of gut microbiota in osteoporosis and osteopenia patients. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Remely, M.; Aumueller, E.; Jahn, D.; Hippe, B.; Brath, H.; Haslberger, A.G. Microbiota and epigenetic regulation of inflammatory mediators in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Benef. Microbes 2014, 5, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Henning, S.M.; Yang, J.; Hsu, M.; Lee, R.P.; Grojean, E.M.; Ly, A.; Tseng, C.H.; Heber, D.; Li, Z. Decaffeinated green and black tea polyphenols decrease weight gain and alter microbiome populations and function in diet-induced obese mice. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 2759–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. George, N.S.; Cheung, L.; Luthria, D.L.; Santin, M.; Dawson, H.D.; Bhagwat, A.A.; Smith, A.D. Pomegranate peel extract alters the microbiome in mice and dysbiosis caused by Citrobacter rodentium infection. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2565–2576. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kong, F.; Hua, Y.; Zeng, B.; Ning, R.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J. Gut microbiota signatures of longevity. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R832–R833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, H.; Sparks, J.B.; Karyala, S.V.; Settlage, R.; Luo, X.M. Host adaptive immunity alters gut microbiota. ISME J. 2015, 9, 770–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ganesh, B.P.; Klopfleisch, R.; Loh, G.; Blaut, M. Commensal Akkermansia muciniphila exacerbates gut inflammation in Salmonella Typhimurium-infected gnotobiotic mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, X.; Guo, J.; Ji, K.; Zhang, P. Bamboo shoot fiber prevents obesity in mice by modulating the gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Biddle, A.; Stewart, L.; Blanchard, J.; Leschine, S. Untangling the genetic basis of fibrolytic specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in diverse gut communities. Diversity 2013, 5, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shang, Q.; Shan, X.; Cai, C.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Yu, G. Dietary fucoidan modulates the gut microbiota in mice by increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3224–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, Y.; Sun, H.; He, S.; Lou, Q.; Yu, M.; Tang, M.; Tu, L. Metabolism and prebiotics activity of anthocyanins from black rice (Oryza sativa L.) in vitro. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhu, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, X.; Li, C.; Zhou, G. The gut microbiota in young and middle-aged rats showed different responses to chicken protein in their diet. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Alpha diversity of microbial samples based on age and diet. (A) Species observed, (B) Shannon diversity index, and (C) inverted Simpson diversity index. Data are represented as boxplots.
Figure 1. Alpha diversity of microbial samples based on age and diet. (A) Species observed, (B) Shannon diversity index, and (C) inverted Simpson diversity index. Data are represented as boxplots.
Nutrients 12 00290 g001
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of microbial samples based on age and diet. (A) Unweighted and (B) weighted UniFrac distance. Young control (green triangle), young BC (orange triangle), old control (green circle), and old BC (orange circle).
Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis of microbial samples based on age and diet. (A) Unweighted and (B) weighted UniFrac distance. Young control (green triangle), young BC (orange triangle), old control (green circle), and old BC (orange circle).
Nutrients 12 00290 g002
Figure 3. Phylum analysis of microbial samples with based on age and diet. (A) Composition of the six most abundant phyla in each sample. Relative abundance of individual phyla, including (B) Firmicutes, (C) Bacteroidetes, (D) Verrucomicrobia, (E) Deferribacteres, (F) Proteobacteria, (G) Ratio of fecal Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in each group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. Phylum analysis of microbial samples with based on age and diet. (A) Composition of the six most abundant phyla in each sample. Relative abundance of individual phyla, including (B) Firmicutes, (C) Bacteroidetes, (D) Verrucomicrobia, (E) Deferribacteres, (F) Proteobacteria, (G) Ratio of fecal Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in each group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Nutrients 12 00290 g003
Table 1. Nutrition facts and total anthocyanin contents of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L) extracts a.
Table 1. Nutrition facts and total anthocyanin contents of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L) extracts a.
Nutrition% (1720 Kj/100g)
Carbohydrate89.2
Protein3.9
Fat3.8
Trans Fat0.5
Saturated Fat0.8
Ash 1.7
Total anthocyanin composition%
Delphinidin-3-rutinoside35–50
Delphinidin-3-glucoside5–20
Cyanidin-3-rutinoside30–45
Cyanidin-3-glucoside3–10
a The information was measured and provided by Just the Berries Ltd.
Table 2. Operational taxonomic units (OUT) abundance significantly modified by age a, b.
Table 2. Operational taxonomic units (OUT) abundance significantly modified by age a, b.
RegulationPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusOTUp-Value
DecreasedFirmicutesClostridiaClostridialesLachnospiraceaeLachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu00450.0013
Otu00470.0008
Otu00590.0045
Otu00610.0046
Otu00740.0100
Otu00890.0012
Otu01240.0012
Otu01250.0031
Otu02010.0039
Otu03140.0072
Otu03510.0028
Otu03530.0028
BlautiaOtu00290.0049
Otu02040.0036
Otu02880.0046
AcetatifactorOtu01210.0016
CoprococcusOtu01410.0002
RoseburiaOtu00690.0080
RuminococcaceaeRuminococcaceae_unclassifiedOtu00990.0013
Otu01590.0007
Otu02270.0005
OscillibacterOtu00390.0003
Otu02110.0034
BacteroidetesBacteroidiaBacteroidalesBacteroidaceaeBacteroidesOtu00100.0000
Otu00120.0053
Otu00140.0014
Otu00170.0024
Otu00180.0079
Otu00730.0000
Otu02200.0085
Otu02410.0063
PorphyromonadaceaeButyricimonasOtu00060.0005
Otu01340.0008
Otu03330.0040
RikenellaceaeAlistipesOtu01300.0003
Bacteroidetes_unclassifiedBacteroidetes_unclassifiedBacteroidetes_unclassifiedBacteroidetes_unclassifiedOtu00700.0074
CyanobacteriaMelainabacteriaGastranaerophilalesGastranaerophilales_unclassifiedGastranaerophilales_unclassifiedOtu00200.0001
Clostridiales_unclassifiedClostridiales_unclassifiedOtu00640.0036
ProteobacteriaDeltaproteobacteriaDesulfovibrionalesDesulfovibrionaceaeDesulfovibrioOtu01840.0028
TenericutesMollicutesRF9RF9_unclassifiedRF9_unclassifiedOtu01810.0043
IncreasedFirmicutesClostridiaClostridialesLachnospiraceaeLachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu00360.0092
Otu01560.0024
RuminococcaceaeAnaerotruncusOtu01140.0001
ErysipelotrichiaErysipelotrichalesErysipelotrichaceaeIncertae_SedisOtu00570.0007
BacteroidetesBacteroidiaBacteroidalesRikenellaceaeAlistipesOtu00130.0027
VerrucomicrobiaVerrucomicrobiaeVerrucomicrobialesVerrucomicrobiaceaeAkkermansiaOtu01270.0029
a Two-way ANOVA tests were performed to determine the main effect of age on individual OTUs. OTUs included are significantly modified (α < 0.01) by age, while interaction was not significant (α < 0.01); b OTU is used to classify groups of closely related individuals.
Table 3. OTU abundance significantly modified by BC a.
Table 3. OTU abundance significantly modified by BC a.
RegulationPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusOTUp-Value
DecreasedFirmicutesClostridiaClostridialesLachnospiraceaeLachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu00530.0027
AcetatifactorOtu00580.0072
BlautiaOtu02690.0012
RuminococcaceaeIncertae_SedisOtu03400.0028
IncreasedFirmicutesClostridiaClostridialesLachnospiraceaeLachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu02650.0068
Lachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu01560.0016
RoseburiaOtu01420.0073
MarvinbryantiaOtu02540.002
a Two-way ANOVA tests were performed to determine the main effect of age on individual OTUs. OTUs included are significantly modified (α < 0.01) by long-term BC administration, while interaction was not significant (α < 0.01). OTU stands for operational taxonomic unit which is used to classify groups of closely related individuals.
Table 4. OTU abundance showed a significant interaction between age and BC a.
Table 4. OTU abundance showed a significant interaction between age and BC a.
PhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusOTUp-Value
AgeBCAge * BC
FirmicutesClostridiaClostridialesLachnospiraceaeLachnospiraceae_unclassifiedOtu00250.00040.00060.0004
Otu01190.00320.00370.0037
Otu01230.00310.00180.0031
Otu01430.24150.05780.0007
Otu02170.68110.41860.0092
Otu02900.00850.00850.0085
Otu03320.00110.00110.0011
Otu0433000
Incertae_SedisOtu00810.04460.04460.0036
Otu02191E-050.00020.0002
Otu03200.00850.00850.0085
BlautiaOtu00500.00460.00170.0019
Otu01900.00012E-050.0001
RoseburiaOtu01180.00650.00260.0082
RuminococcaceaeAnaerotruncusOtu01260.00010.00110.003
IntestinimonasOtu01520.00060.0090.009
OscillibacterOtu02210.06670.02220.0028
PseudoflavonifractorOtu00920.12410.11490.0066
vadinBB60vadinBB60_unclassifiedOtu03230.08050.08050.004
VerrucomicrobiaVerrucomicrobiaeVerrucomicrobialesVerrucomicrobiaceaeAkkermansiaOtu000100.00027E-05
BacteroidetesBacteroidiaBacteroidalesBacteroidaceaeBacteroidesOtu03760.0040.0040.004
a Two-way ANOVA tests were performed to determine the interaction between age and BC on individual OTUs. OTUs included showed a significant (α < 0.01) interaction between age and long-term BC administration. OTU stands for operational taxonomic unit which is used to classify groups of closely related individuals; * Indicates the interaction between two main factors (age and blackcurrant).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, L.; Lee, S.G.; Melough, M.M.; Sakaki, J.R.; Maas, K.R.; Koo, S.I.; Chun, O.K. Long-Term Blackcurrant Supplementation Modified Gut Microbiome Profiles in Mice in an Age-Dependent Manner: An Exploratory Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020290

AMA Style

Cao L, Lee SG, Melough MM, Sakaki JR, Maas KR, Koo SI, Chun OK. Long-Term Blackcurrant Supplementation Modified Gut Microbiome Profiles in Mice in an Age-Dependent Manner: An Exploratory Study. Nutrients. 2020; 12(2):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Lei, Sang Gil Lee, Melissa M. Melough, Junichi R. Sakaki, Kendra R. Maas, Sung I. Koo, and Ock K. Chun. 2020. "Long-Term Blackcurrant Supplementation Modified Gut Microbiome Profiles in Mice in an Age-Dependent Manner: An Exploratory Study" Nutrients 12, no. 2: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop