Next Article in Journal
Effect of Solar-Cloud-Satellite Geometry on Land Surface Shortwave Radiation Derived from Remotely Sensed Data
Previous Article in Journal
Remote Sensing of Spatiotemporal Changes in Wetland Geomorphology Based on Type 2 Fuzzy Sets: A Case Study of Beidagang Wetland from 1975 to 2015
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: A Machine Learning Method for Co-Registration and Individual Tree Matching of Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 505

1
Remote Sensing & Geoinformatics Department, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany
2
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(7), 692; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070692
Submission received: 29 June 2017 / Revised: 30 June 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published: 5 July 2017
Since Equation (2) has been rearranged incorrectly during preparation for this article [1], the authors would like to correct the relevant text of Section 3.4.3 as follows:
3.4.3. Synthetic Tree Detections
A tree crown is defined by the tree species-specific parameters b and c (see Table 2), the tree height h, crown base height c b h , and its crown radius r (all provided by the Waldplaner 2.0 software, [2]). The height above ground e i of a point with distance d i to the tree location less than or equal to r is calculated by Equation (2). Please note that since the parameters of the Douglas fir were not given by Pretzsch [3], these were assumed to be similar to the parameters of the Norway spruce.
e i = h c · ( h c b h ) · d i r 1 b
For each plot, we generated uniquely-distributed xy-coordinates with the same pulse density as the original point cloud. For each point, the z-coordinate was calculated by applying Equation (2) for all trees and adding the value of the DTM (of the original ALS point cloud) at the tree location. Finally, the point is linked to the tree which resulted in the maximum z-coordinate and—for a subsequent evaluation—it is labeled with the ID of that tree.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage.

References

  1. Lamprecht, S.; Hill, A.; Stoffels, J.; Udelhoven, H. A Machine Learning Method for Co-Registration and Individual Tree Matching of Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hansen, J.; Nagel, J. Waldwachstumskundliche Softwaresysteme auf Basis von TreeGrOSS-Anwendung und Theoretische Grundlagen; Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek: Göttingen, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pretzsch, H. Modellierung des Waldwachstums; Parey: Berlin, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lamprecht, S.; Hill, A.; Stoffels, J.; Udelhoven, T. Erratum: A Machine Learning Method for Co-Registration and Individual Tree Matching of Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 505. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070692

AMA Style

Lamprecht S, Hill A, Stoffels J, Udelhoven T. Erratum: A Machine Learning Method for Co-Registration and Individual Tree Matching of Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 505. Remote Sensing. 2017; 9(7):692. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lamprecht, Sebastian, Andreas Hill, Johannes Stoffels, and Thomas Udelhoven. 2017. "Erratum: A Machine Learning Method for Co-Registration and Individual Tree Matching of Forest Inventory and Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 505" Remote Sensing 9, no. 7: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070692

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop