Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Suspended Particulate Matter and Its Drivers in Sahelian Ponds and Lakes by Remote Sensing (Landsat and MODIS): Gourma Region, Mali
Next Article in Special Issue
Diverse Responses of Vegetation Phenology to Climate Change in Different Grasslands in Inner Mongolia during 2000–2016
Previous Article in Journal
An Evaluation of Satellite Estimates of Solar Surface Irradiance Using Ground Observations in San Antonio, Texas, USA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grassland Phenology Response to Drought in the Canadian Prairies
Open AccessArticle

Performance of Smoothing Methods for Reconstructing NDVI Time-Series and Estimating Vegetation Phenology from MODIS Data

1
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
2
Department of Materials Science and Applied Mathematics, Malmö University, SE-205 06 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(12), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9121271
Received: 8 September 2017 / Revised: 1 December 2017 / Accepted: 4 December 2017 / Published: 7 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Surface Phenology )
Many time-series smoothing methods can be used for reducing noise and extracting plant phenological parameters from remotely-sensed data, but there is still no conclusive evidence in favor of one method over others. Here we use moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to investigate five smoothing methods: Savitzky-Golay fitting (SG), locally weighted regression scatterplot smoothing (LO), spline smoothing (SP), asymmetric Gaussian function fitting (AG), and double logistic function fitting (DL). We use ground tower measured NDVI (10 sites) and gross primary productivity (GPP, 4 sites) to evaluate the smoothed satellite-derived NDVI time-series, and elevation data to evaluate phenology parameters derived from smoothed NDVI. The results indicate that all smoothing methods can reduce noise and improve signal quality, but that no single method always performs better than others. Overall, the local filtering methods (SG and LO) can generate very accurate results if smoothing parameters are optimally calibrated. If local calibration cannot be performed, cross validation is a way to automatically determine the smoothing parameter. However, this method may in some cases generate poor fits, and when calibration is not possible the function fitting methods (AG and DL) provide the most robust description of the seasonal dynamics. View Full-Text
Keywords: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); smoothing methods; gross primary production (GPP); phenology; TIMESAT; MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); smoothing methods; gross primary production (GPP); phenology; TIMESAT; MODIS
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, Z.; Jönsson, P.; Jin, H.; Eklundh, L. Performance of Smoothing Methods for Reconstructing NDVI Time-Series and Estimating Vegetation Phenology from MODIS Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 1271.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop