Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Different Support Vectors on GOSAT-2 CAI-2 L2 Cloud Discrimination
Next Article in Special Issue
The Benefits of the Ka-Band as Evidenced from the SARAL/AltiKa Altimetric Mission: Quality Assessment and Unique Characteristics of AltiKa Data
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperspectral Image Segmentation via Frequency-Based Similarity for Mixed Noise Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Jason-2 Sea Surface Heights within 10 km Offshore by Retracking Decontaminated Waveforms
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

River Levels Derived with CryoSat-2 SAR Data Classification—A Case Study in the Mekong River Basin

Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut der Technischen Universität München (DGFI-TUM), Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
Division of Geodesy, DTU Space, National Space Institute, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(12), 1238;
Received: 13 October 2017 / Revised: 23 November 2017 / Accepted: 27 November 2017 / Published: 30 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite Altimetry for Earth Sciences)
PDF [3764 KB, uploaded 30 November 2017]


In this study we use CryoSat-2 SAR (delay-Doppler synthetic-aperture radar) data in the Mekong River Basin to estimate water levels. Compared to classical pulse limited radar altimetry, medium- and small-sized inland waters can be observed with CryoSat-2 SAR data with a higher accuracy due to the smaller along track footprint. However, even with this SAR data the estimation of water levels over a medium-sized river (width less than 500 m) is still challenging with only very few consecutive observations over the water. The target identification with land–water masks tends to fail as the river becomes smaller. Therefore, we developed a classification approach to divide the observations into water and land returns based solely on the data. The classification is done with an unsupervised classification algorithm, and it is based on features derived from the SAR and range-integrated power (RIP) waveforms. After the classification, classes representing water and land are identified. Better results are obtained when the Mekong River Basin is divided into different geographical regions: upstream, middle stream, and downstream. The measurements classified as water are used in a next step to estimate water levels for each crossing over a river in the Mekong River network. The resulting water levels are validated and compared to gauge data, Envisat data, and CryoSat-2 water levels derived with a land–water mask. The CryoSat-2 water levels derived with the classification lead to more valid observations with fewer outliers in the upstream region than with a land–water mask (1700 with 2% outliers vs. 1500 with 7% outliers). The median of the annual differences that is used in the validation is in all test regions smaller for the CryoSat-2 classification results than for Envisat or CryoSat-2 land–water mask results (for the entire study area: 0.76 m vs. 0.96 m vs. 0.83 m, respectively). Overall, in the upstream region with small- and medium-sized rivers the classification approach is more effective for deriving reliable water level observations than in the middle stream region with wider rivers. View Full-Text
Keywords: satellite altimetry; inland water; CryosSat-2 SAR; Mekong Basin; water level time series; classification; stack data satellite altimetry; inland water; CryosSat-2 SAR; Mekong Basin; water level time series; classification; stack data

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Boergens, E.; Nielsen, K.; Andersen, O.B.; Dettmering, D.; Seitz, F. River Levels Derived with CryoSat-2 SAR Data Classification—A Case Study in the Mekong River Basin. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 1238.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top