Correction: Singh, A., et al. Remote Sensing of Storage Fluctuations of Poorly Gauged Reservoirs and State Space Model (SSM)-Based Estimation. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 17113–17134

The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper [1]. There are two mistakes in this article. A change is necessary in Equation (1) (p. 17120). Due to a typing error, please replace:

$$ALVV={\displaystyle \sum }_{t=1}^n\frac{1}{3}\times \left(H_t-H_{t-1}\right)\times \left(A_t+A_{t+1}+\sqrt{\left(A_t\times A_{t+1}\right)}\right)$$

(1)

with

$$ALVV={\displaystyle \sum }_{t=1}^n\frac{1}{3}\times \left(H_t-H_{t-1}\right)\times \left(A_t+A_{t-1}+\sqrt{\left(A_t\times A_{t-1}\right)}\right)$$

(1)

Due to a mislabeling, a change is necessary in Figure 10 (p. 17126); please replace:

Figure 10. Lake Mead SSM analysis. (Top left) The combined SSM estimate (CSSME) (magenta line) and the forecast (green line) for 2013 and 2014; (Bottom left) difference between CSSME and in situ observations; (Top right) estimated seasonal component; (Bottom right) estimated trend component. The dashed cyan lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence limit.

Figure 10. Lake Mead SSM analysis. (Top left) The combined SSM estimate (CSSME) (magenta line) and the forecast (green line) for 2013 and 2014; (Bottom left) difference between CSSME and in situ observations; (Top right) estimated seasonal component; (Bottom right) estimated trend component. The dashed cyan lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence limit.

with

Figure 10. Lake Mead SSM analysis. (Top left) The combined SSM estimate (CSSME) (black line) and the forecast (green line) for 2013 and 2014; (Bottom left) difference between CSSME and in situ observations; (Top right) estimated seasonal component; (Bottom right) estimated trend component. The dashed cyan lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence limit.

Figure 10. Lake Mead SSM analysis. (Top left) The combined SSM estimate (CSSME) (black line) and the forecast (green line) for 2013 and 2014; (Bottom left) difference between CSSME and in situ observations; (Top right) estimated seasonal component; (Bottom right) estimated trend component. The dashed cyan lines indicate the upper and lower 95% confidence limit.

These changes have no material impact on the conclusions of our paper. We apologize to our readers. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage.