Next Article in Journal
1982–2010 Trends of Light Use Efficiency and Inherent Water Use Efficiency in African vegetation: Sensitivity to Climate and Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations
Previous Article in Journal
Annual Detection of Forest Cover Loss Using Time Series Satellite Measurements of Percent Tree Cover
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2014, 6(9), 8904-8922;

A Comparison of Model-Assisted Estimators to Infer Land Cover/Use Class Area Using Satellite Imagery

State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, The College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 11 April 2014 / Revised: 18 July 2014 / Accepted: 9 September 2014 / Published: 19 September 2014
Full-Text   |   PDF [2686 KB, uploaded 19 September 2014]   |  


Remote sensing provides timely, economic, and objective data over a large area and has become the main data source for land cover/use area estimation. However, the classification results cannot be directly used to calculate the area of a given land cover/use type because of classification errors. The main purpose of this study is to explore the performance and stability of several model-assisted estimators in various overall accuracies of classification and sampling fractions. In this study, the confusion matrix calibration direct estimator, confusion matrix calibration inverse estimator, ratio estimator, and simple regression estimator were implemented to infer the areas of several land cover classes using simple random sampling without replacement in two experiments: a case study using simulation data based on RapidEye images and that using actual RapidEye and Huan Jing (HJ)-1A images. In addition, the simple estimator using a simple random sample without replacement was regarded as a basic estimator. The comparison results suggested that the confusion matrix calibration estimators, ratio estimator, and simple regression estimator could provide more accurate and stable estimates than the simple random sampling estimator. In addition, high-quality classification data played a positive role in the estimation, and the confusion matrix inverse estimators were more sensitive to the classification accuracy. In the simulated experiment, the average deviation of a confusion matrix calibration inverse estimator decreased by about 0.195 with the increasing overall accuracy of classification; otherwise, the variation of the other three model-assisted estimators was 0.102. Moreover, the simple regression estimator was slightly superior to the confusion matrix calibration estimators and required fewer sample units under acceptable classification accuracy levels of 70%–90%. View Full-Text
Keywords: area estimation; classification accuracy; model-assisted inference area estimation; classification accuracy; model-assisted inference

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Zhu, X.; Pan, Y.; Gu, J.; Zhao, A.; Liu, X. A Comparison of Model-Assisted Estimators to Infer Land Cover/Use Class Area Using Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 8904-8922.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top