Next Article in Journal
Eclipse Impact on a Remote Sensing Data Set: PAL NDVI 10-Day Composite from February 11 to 20 in 1999 for Western Australia
Previous Article in Journal
Land Surface Albedos Computed from BRF Measurements with a Study of Conversion Formulae
Article

Erosion Relevant Topographical Parameters Derived from Different DEMs—A Comparative Study from the Indian Lesser Himalayas

Institute of Soil Science and Forest Nutrition, Faculty of Forest and Environmental Science, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg i.Br., Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2010, 2(8), 1941-1961; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2081941
Received: 30 June 2010 / Revised: 2 August 2010 / Accepted: 2 August 2010 / Published: 13 August 2010
Topography is a crucial surface characteristic in soil erosion modeling. Soil erosion studies use a digital elevation model (DEM) to derive the topographical characteristics of a study area. Majority of the times, a DEM is incorporated into erosion models as a given parameter and it is not tested as extensively as are the parameters related to soil, land-use and climate. This study compares erosion relevant topographical parameters—elevation, slope, aspect, LS factor—derived from 3 DEMs at original and 20 m interpolated resolution with field measurements for a 13 km2 watershed located in the Indian Lesser Himalaya. The DEMs are: a TOPO DEM generated from digitized contour lines on a 1:50,000 topographical map; a Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM at 90-m resolution; and an Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) DEM at 15-m resolution. Significant differences across the DEMs were observed for all the parameters. The highest resolution ASTER DEM was found to be the poorest of all the tested DEMs as the topographical parameters derived from it differed significantly from those derived from other DEMs and field measurements. TOPO DEM, which is, theoretically more detailed, produced similar results to the coarser SRTM DEM, but failed to produce an improved representation of the watershed topography. Comparison with field measurements and mixed regression modeling proved SRTM DEM to be the most reliable among the tested DEMs for the studied watershed. View Full-Text
Keywords: DEMs; ASTER; SRTM; topographical parameters; soil erosion modeling DEMs; ASTER; SRTM; topographical parameters; soil erosion modeling
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Datta, P.S.; Schack-Kirchner, H. Erosion Relevant Topographical Parameters Derived from Different DEMs—A Comparative Study from the Indian Lesser Himalayas. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1941-1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2081941

AMA Style

Datta PS, Schack-Kirchner H. Erosion Relevant Topographical Parameters Derived from Different DEMs—A Comparative Study from the Indian Lesser Himalayas. Remote Sensing. 2010; 2(8):1941-1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2081941

Chicago/Turabian Style

Datta, Pawanjeet S.; Schack-Kirchner, Helmer. 2010. "Erosion Relevant Topographical Parameters Derived from Different DEMs—A Comparative Study from the Indian Lesser Himalayas" Remote Sens. 2, no. 8: 1941-1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2081941

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop