Next Article in Journal
Research on Rice Field Identification Methods in Mountainous Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Vineyard Dynamics: UAS-Based Monitoring at the Individual Vine Scale
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Retrieval Algorithms to Inter-Sensor Brightness Temperature Differences

1
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(19), 3355; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193355
Submission received: 5 August 2025 / Revised: 25 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology)

Abstract

Passive microwave remote sensing provides indispensable observations for constructing long-term snow depth records, which are critical for climatology, hydrology, and operational applications. Nevertheless, despite decades of snow depth monitoring, systematic evaluations of how inter-sensor brightness temperature differences (TBDs) propagate into retrieval uncertainties are still lacking. In this study, TBDs between DMSP-F18/SSMIS, FY-3D/MWRI, and AMSR2 sensors were quantified, and the sensitivity of seven snow depth retrieval algorithms to these discrepancies was systematically assessed. The results indicate that TBDs between SSMIS and AMSR2 are larger than those between MWRI and AMSR2, likely reflecting variations in sensor specifications such as frequency, observation angle, and overpass time. In terms of algorithm sensitivity, SPD, WESTDC, FY-3B, and FY-3D demonstrate less sensitivity across sensors, with standard deviations of snow depth differences generally below 2 cm. In contrast, the Foster algorithm exhibits pronounced sensitivity to TBDs, with standard deviations exceeding 11 cm and snow depth differences reaching over 20 cm in heavily forested regions (forest fracion >90%). This study provides guidance for SWE virtual constellation design and algorithm selection, supporting long-term, seamless, and consistent snow depth retrievals.
Keywords: passive microwave (PMW) remote sensing; brightness temperature difference; snow depth; snow depth algorithm passive microwave (PMW) remote sensing; brightness temperature difference; snow depth; snow depth algorithm

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.; Jiang, L.; Cui, H.; Pan, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, M. Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Retrieval Algorithms to Inter-Sensor Brightness Temperature Differences. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193355

AMA Style

Liu G, Jiang L, Cui H, Pan J, Yang J, Wu M. Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Retrieval Algorithms to Inter-Sensor Brightness Temperature Differences. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(19):3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Guangjin, Lingmei Jiang, Huizhen Cui, Jinmei Pan, Jianwei Yang, and Min Wu. 2025. "Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Retrieval Algorithms to Inter-Sensor Brightness Temperature Differences" Remote Sensing 17, no. 19: 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193355

APA Style

Liu, G., Jiang, L., Cui, H., Pan, J., Yang, J., & Wu, M. (2025). Assessing the Sensitivity of Snow Depth Retrieval Algorithms to Inter-Sensor Brightness Temperature Differences. Remote Sensing, 17(19), 3355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop