Next Article in Journal
Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Model for Underwater Target Localization and Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Unsupervised Land Cover Analysis with Socioeconomic Change for Post-Industrial Cities: A Case Study of Ponca City, Oklahoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Robust Registration of Multi-Source Terrain Point Clouds via Region-Aware Adaptive Weighting and Cauchy Residual Control

1
College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
Inner Mongolia Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Ordos 010300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(17), 2960; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172960
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 24 August 2025 / Published: 26 August 2025

Abstract

Multi-source topographic point clouds are of great value in applications such as mine monitoring, geological hazard assessment, and high-precision terrain modeling. However, challenges such as heterogeneous data sources, drastic terrain variations, and significant differences in point density severely hinder accurate registration. To address these issues, this study proposes a robust point cloud registration method named Cauchy-AdaV2, which integrates region-adaptive weighting with Cauchy-based residual suppression. The method jointly leverages slope and roughness to partition terrain into regions and constructs a spatially heterogeneous weighting function. Meanwhile, the Cauchy M-estimator is employed to mitigate the impact of outlier correspondences, enhancing registration accuracy while maintaining adequate correspondence coverage. The results indicate that the proposed method significantly outperforms traditional ICP, GICP, and NDT methods in terms of overall error metrics (MAE, RMSE), error control in complex terrain regions, and cross-sectional structural alignment. Specifically, it achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0646 m and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0688 m, which are 70.5% and 72.4% lower than those of ICP, respectively. These outcomes demonstrate that the proposed method possesses stronger spatial consistency and terrain adaptability. Ablation studies confirm the complementary benefits of regional and residual weighting, while efficiency analysis shows the method to be practically applicable in large-scale point cloud scenarios. This work provides an effective solution for high-precision registration of heterogeneous point clouds, especially in challenging environments characterized by complex terrain and strong disturbances.
Keywords: ICP; multi-source data; complex terrain; robust estimation; regional weighting ICP; multi-source data; complex terrain; robust estimation; regional weighting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, S.; Cui, X.; Yuan, D.; Yang, H. Robust Registration of Multi-Source Terrain Point Clouds via Region-Aware Adaptive Weighting and Cauchy Residual Control. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172960

AMA Style

Sun S, Cui X, Yuan D, Yang H. Robust Registration of Multi-Source Terrain Point Clouds via Region-Aware Adaptive Weighting and Cauchy Residual Control. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(17):2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Shuaihui, Ximin Cui, Debao Yuan, and Huidong Yang. 2025. "Robust Registration of Multi-Source Terrain Point Clouds via Region-Aware Adaptive Weighting and Cauchy Residual Control" Remote Sensing 17, no. 17: 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172960

APA Style

Sun, S., Cui, X., Yuan, D., & Yang, H. (2025). Robust Registration of Multi-Source Terrain Point Clouds via Region-Aware Adaptive Weighting and Cauchy Residual Control. Remote Sensing, 17(17), 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop