Next Article in Journal
Applying Deep Learning Methods for a Large-Scale Riparian Vegetation Classification from High-Resolution Multimodal Aerial Remote Sensing Data
Previous Article in Journal
GNSS-Based Models of Displacement, Stress, and Strain in the SHETPENANT Region: Impact of Geodynamic Activity from the ORCA Submarine Volcano
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

Framework for Mapping Sublimation Features on Mars’ South Polar Cap Using Object-Based Image Analysis †

by
Racine D. Cleveland
1,*,
Vincent F. Chevrier
1,2 and
Jason A. Tullis
2
1
Center for Space and Planetary Sciences, University of Arkansas, Stone House North (STON), 332 North Arkansas Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
2
Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, 304 N Campus Walk, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version of our paper Cleveland, R.D. An Object-Based Image Analysis of the Swiss Cheese Terrain Evolution on the Martian South Pole. In Proceedings of the 53rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 7–11 March 2022.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(14), 2372; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142372
Submission received: 7 May 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025

Abstract

Mars’ south polar cap hosts dynamic landforms known as Swiss cheese features (SCFs), which form through the sublimation of carbon dioxide (CO2) ice driven by the planet’s extreme seasonal and diurnal solar insolation cycles. These shallow, rounded depressions—first identified by Mars Global Surveyor in 1999 and later monitored by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO)—have been observed to increase in size over time. However, large-scale analysis of SCF formation and growth has been limited by the slow and labor-intensive nature of manual mapping techniques. This study applies object-based image analysis (OBIA) to automate the detection and measurement of SCFs using High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) images spanning five Martian years. Results show that SCFs exhibit a near-linear increase in area, suggesting that summer sublimation consistently outpaces winter CO2 deposition. Validation against manual digitization shows discrepancies of less than 1%, confirming the reliability of the OBIA method. Regression-based extrapolation of growth trends indicates that the current generation of SCFs likely began forming between Martian years 7 and 16, approximately corresponding to Earth years 1976 to 1998. These findings provide a quantitative assessment of SCF evolution and contribute to our understanding of recent climate-driven surface changes on Mars. HiRISE images were processed using the eCognition software to detect, classify, and measure SCFs, demonstrating that OBIA is a scalable and effective tool for analyzing dynamic planetary landforms.

1. Introduction

Remote sensing provides a powerful means of studying planetary surfaces, enabling researchers to detect, monitor, and model change across vast spatial and temporal scales [1,2]. Traditionally, planetary image analysis relied on pixel-based classification—assigning values based solely on spectral differences at the individual pixel level—techniques, which were well suited for coarse-resolution imagery but faltered with high-resolution or off-nadir data [3,4,5]. Such approaches often struggle to resolve morphologically complex or overlapping features like ice layers, dunes, or craters, particularly when spatial resolution exceeds pixel size [2,6]. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) addresses these limitations by segmenting imagery into spatially coherent objects and analyzing them with respect to size, shape, texture, spectral signature, and spatial context [1,2,7].
The roots of OBIA extend back to Colwell’s 1965 work, which emphasized the importance of spatial homogeneity, tone, texture, shape, and pattern recognition in aerial photo interpretation [8]. The methodology evolved into Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) in the late 1990s and early 2000s with the development of platforms such as Trimble eCognition, which enabled multi-resolution segmentation, hierarchical rule sets, and knowledge-driven classification systems [1,2,7]. Over the last two decades, OBIA has become a standard tool in terrestrial remote sensing applications—ranging from agriculture and forestry [3] to urban planning [5,9] and to coastal and vegetation change detection [1,2]. These applications benefit from OBIA’s ability to analyze spatial relationships, object boundaries, and shape metrics in ways that per-pixel methods cannot. Despite the availability of high-resolution planetary imagery from instruments like HiRISE and HRSC, OBIA remains underutilized in planetary science [4,6]. However, this is beginning to change. For example, a study presented at LPSC 2024 applied OBIA techniques to delineate impact craters from HRSC digital elevation models. By segmenting based on morphometric parameters and crater rim geometries, the researchers demonstrated that object-based methods can handle large-scale, 3D planetary terrain analysis [10].
One class of planetary landforms that particularly benefits from OBIA’s capabilities is Mars’ South Polar Swiss cheese features (SCFs). These quasi-circular sublimation pits form in the South Polar Residual Cap (SPRC), a permanent CO2 ice deposit with an estimated volume of ~380 km3 [11] (Figure 1). This cap persists through the summer due to Mars’ axial tilt of 25° and unique orbital characteristics, which influence the annual deposition and sublimation of CO2 frost [12,13,14]. Unlike the North Pole, which sublimates its entire CO2 layer, leaving an H2O-rich residual cap, the South Pole retains a CO2-rich cap year-round [15,16,17]. These differences were initially characterized in Viking and MOC data, with later refinements from Mars Global Surveyor, Mars Odyssey, and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter [12,16,18]. SCFs were first formally described by Thomas et al. (2000), who noted their circularity, flat-topped mesas, and steep-walled pits [16]. Subsequent studies used MOC and HiRISE data to estimate their average depth at ~8 m using shadow measurements [19] and found that individual stratigraphic layers within the SPRC can be 1–2 m thick [19,20].
The seasonal formation and retreat of SCFs is driven by solar insolation, which causes CO2 sublimation at the edges of the pits during spring and summer (Figure 2) [2,3,14]. Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) modeled this process and concluded that pit growth occurs through lateral sublimation at pit walls, driven by the angle of solar incidence [21]. The sublimation of these pits contributes to seasonal atmospheric changes, influencing as much as a quarter of the Martian atmospheric CO2 budget [9]. As such, SCFs serve as key indicators of polar stability and are critical for understanding long-term volatile transport and the Martian climate system [3,12]. Yet most prior SCF mapping efforts have used manual digitization, threshold-based segmentation, or pixel-level classification—methods that are time-intensive, difficult to reproduce, and impractical for processing large volumes of HiRISE imagery [10,12].
In this study, we present a semi-automated OBIA framework designed to measure SCF evolution over five Martian years using HiRISE imagery. By segmenting pits as individual objects and quantifying their morphometric attributes (e.g., area, perimeter, circularity, and convexity), we produce consistent, objective measurements of pit retreat and growth over time. Our goal is to bridge the gap between planetary science and OBIA by demonstrating a workflow that is scalable, reproducible, and interpretable. This approach enables robust change detection across multiple time steps and offers a practical foundation for future object-based analyses of dynamic planetary landforms—both on Mars and elsewhere in the solar system.

2. Materials and Methods

To determine the evolution of sublimation pits on the south residual polar cap, we used high-resolution images collected by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE), a camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO). The altitude of MRO varies between 200–400 km. This directly impacts the spatial resolution of the imagery it collects. HiRISE is a linear array push broom scanner with a width of ~6 km and length of up to ~60 km. HiRISE captures images through three main spectral filters, with 14 parallel CCD (Charged-Coupled Device) detectors, with 10 CCDs in the red band, 2 in the blue/green bands, and 2 in the near infrared band. The nominal spatial resolution of HiRISE is ~0.25 m/pixel at a 300 km altitude [22].
Trimble eCognition 10.2 was used to develop and implement the object-based image analysis (OBIA) workflow applied in this study (Figure 3). A hierarchical design was adopted, structured through a ruleset framework as defined within the eCognition software environment [1,3,4]. The ruleset integrates multiple scale parameters, including polygonal shape recognition, object-based homogeneity metrics, and minimum albedo thresholds, allowing for a multi-level, non-linear classification strategy.
Object-based image analysis (OBIA) differs fundamentally from traditional pixel-based classification by aggregating adjacent pixels into spatially contiguous, spectrally and texturally homogeneous objects. These objects, rather than individual pixels, become the primary units of analysis. This methodological shift is particularly advantageous when delineating irregular or morphologically complex surface features, such as Swiss cheese features (SCFs), where spatial coherence, edge continuity, and internal variance are critical parameters [23]. eCognition facilitates this workflow through a sequence of image segmentation, feature extraction, and context-based object refinement, incorporating both internal object properties and external relational metrics (e.g., adjacency, proximity, and border relationships) [9].
For this study, we developed a structured object-based image analysis (OBIA) workflow implemented in Trimble eCognition. The workflow consists of five key stages: (1) multi-resolution segmentation to generate objects, (3) object reshaping to refine edges, (4) noise control and merging of small fragments, (5) classification based on object metrics, and (6) export of the final pit vectors to a GIS for measurement. A flow diagram of the complete process is presented in Figure 3.
Segmentation constitutes the initial step, wherein the image is partitioned into discrete, polygonal objects based on thresholds in spatial and spectral homogeneity [2,5]. In this study, segmentation parameters were optimized to isolate relevant features, including non-pit mesa surfaces, merged pit complexes, and inner shadow regions. Variables such as object shape, size, texture, and spatial location were used to guide the segmentation process.
Contextual reshaping operations were subsequently applied, leveraging a nearest neighbor analysis to refine object boundaries and enhance classification accuracy [7]. Concurrently, noise control mechanisms merged smaller homogeneous fragments into larger, adjacent objects based on relational border percentage thresholds, with automatic re-segmentation performed where criteria were unmet. This multi-scale object-based framework aligns with recent best practices in planetary landform extraction [24,25].
Following segmentation and reshaping, image objects were classified into three thematic categories: pits, non-pits, and merged pits. This classification scheme reflects the established morphological types of Swiss cheese features described in previous studies, which distinguish between isolated depressions, flat mesa surfaces, and compound pits resulting from coalescence [11,12,16]. The classification process employed a decision rule framework based on object-level attributes, including gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) homogeneity, mean brightness, polygonal shape descriptors (e.g., compactness and elongation), and size metrics. To account for scene-specific differences in illumination and seasonal contrast, image-specific OBIA parameters were defined and applied during both segmentation and classification stages. Objects were assigned to one of the three classes based on threshold values set within the ruleset, allowing for selective export of individual categories or grouped outputs for further analysis.
Final classified polygons were subsequently imported into ArcGIS Pro 3.4.0 for areal measurements and spatial statistical analyses.

3. Results

An accuracy assessment was conducted to validate the object-based image analysis (OBIA) method against manual digitization of three arbitrarily selected pits from HiRISE image PSP_004687_0930. As shown in Table 1, the areas derived from OBIA differed from manually digitized areas by less than 1% for all three pits. Pit O showed a difference of 0.98%, Pit Q differed by 0.24%, and Pit T differed by 0.99%. These minimal differences confirm that the OBIA methodology reliably captures pit boundaries with high precision, enabling its application for broader temporal analysis. The coefficient of determination (R2) quantifies how well the linear regression model explains the variability in pit area as a function of estimated formation time. In this study, R2 values ranging from 0.918 to 0.991 indicate that the linear models captured a strong and consistent relationship between pit growth and time, with over 91% to 99% of the observed variation in area explained by the model.
Following validation, pit areas were measured across 4 HiRISE images collected over a span of five Martian years, from MY 27 to MY 33. Measurements consistently demonstrated an increase in pit area over time. As shown in Figure 4, a near-linear relationship is evident between pit area and fractional Martian year for all pits.
Across all 29 pits shown in Figure 5, the average growth rate was approximately 2499.24 m2 per Martian year, with individual rates ranging from 1043 to 3566 m2/MY. Despite this variability, the regression models consistently showed strong linear fits, with an average R2 value of 0.98, indicating that sublimation-driven pit expansion generally followed a linear trend throughout the study interval. These results validate the use of linear modeling to estimate pit formation timing and support the broader interpretation of SCF evolution as a sustained, ongoing process.
Extrapolation of the linear regression models allows for an estimation of when each pit reached a near-zero area, interpreted as the likely beginning of pit formation. For example, regression lines project backward to formation points at approximately Martian year 18.4 for Pit O, MY 16.2 for Pit Q, and MY 15.6 for Pit T. These estimates were derived from linear models of pit area versus fractional Martian year, calculated as the sum of the Mars year and the solar longitude (Ls) divided by 360. This method provides a sub-annual, temporal resolution, allowing for the precise alignment of measurements taken at different points in the Martian seasonal cycle. Model fit was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2). The consistently high R2 values indicate that pit growth is well-approximated by a linear trend over the observed time span.
While the regression fits are strong (0.98 R2 average for all pits), it is important to note that extrapolation assumes a constant sublimation rate over time. This approach does not explicitly account for local topographic effects, interannual climate variability, or shifts in insolation caused by changes in Mars’ obliquity. Nevertheless, the near-linear growth trends and agreement across independently measured pits provide plausible support for the inferred timelines.

4. Discussion

The extended regression lines in Figure 5 indicate that these SCFs currently observed on Mars’ South Polar Residual Cap likely began forming between Martian years 7 and 16. These estimates were derived by extrapolating pit area growth trends backward to the point at which the pit area approaches zero. While fractional Martian years were used in the regression analysis to preserve sub-annual precision, final formation estimates were rounded to the nearest Mars year for interpretability. This formation window suggests that the observed SCFs are geologically young features, formed within the last 20 to 30 Martian years, under ongoing sublimation-driven processes.
To independently validate these formation estimates, we also calculated the Earth year of pit (E) formation using the following equation [26]:
E = R A     L D
where R represents the acquisition year of the most recent HiRISE image used in this study, 2015. In this equation, the Martian pit age (variable A, in Mars years–MY) is multiplied by 687 (L, the number of Earth days in a Martian year) and divided by 365.2425 (D, the length of an Earth year in Earth days under the Gregorian calendar system). This method introduces only minor uncertainty, as the effects of leap year corrections are incorporated within the 365.2425 divisor. Additional adjustments for accumulated leap days would account for only a few months’ difference over the timescales analyzed, falling within the overall margin of error. Applying this method to all 29 pits in the dataset yields an estimated Earth-year formation range between approximately 1976 and 1998.
Calculating the approximate Earth year of pit formation provides a meaningful cross-planetary temporal context that complements the Martian-year-based analysis. This is not meant to imply a precise Earth-age correlation but rather to anchor Martian surface evolution in terms familiar to climate science and geologic time on Earth. For example, Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) estimated that Swiss cheese features (SCFs) began forming between Earth years 1600 and 1920 based on modeling sublimation rates and observed cap retreat [21]. By translating our modeled formation ages into Earth years, we enabled a direct comparison to this earlier work, which was expressed entirely in Earth calendar terms [7]. The broad consistency of our results with their proposed timeline supports the idea that SCF formation is ongoing and that the pits analyzed in this study are representative of the most recent generation of polar activity. Additionally, expressing ages in Earth years helps connect Mars’ volatile-driven surface changes to broader solar insolation trends or historical orbital configurations that are often cataloged in Earth years [27].
The rapid lateral expansion of SCFs observed in this study further supports the conclusion that these features are geologically young (Figure 5). Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) [21] demonstrated, based on Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) observations, that individual pits could form within approximately 100 to 200 Earth years under a constant sublimation-driven expansion. Subsequent measurements by Thomas et al. (2005) [19] confirmed active pit growth between successive imaging campaigns, highlighting the ongoing and dynamic nature of SCF formation. Later reviews by Byrne (2009) [18] reinforced the interpretation that SCFs are among the youngest geomorphological features on Mars, dynamically evolving under present-day climate conditions. Together, these findings align closely with the rates calculated in this study.
Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) proposed a sublimation model suggesting that the CO2 ice layer, approximately 8 m thick, is being etched away, revealing underlying water ice [21]. This model is supported by thermal infrared data indicating the presence of water ice beneath the CO2 layer [17,21,22]. Additionally, the angle of sunlight during the Martian summer causes the walls of these pits to receive more intense sunlight than the floors, leading to increased sublimation at the walls and a gradual enlargement of the pits [12,15,16,21]. Over time, this process contributes to the dynamic and ever-changing landscape of the SPRC [11,15,19,21,28,29].
However, the process of estimating the age of CO2 sublimation pits based on their growth rate is more complex than a straightforward linear relationship. Several factors, such as the size of the pits, the rate of sublimation, seasonal variations, and atmospheric changes, are likely to influence the growth patterns. A larger pit would likely experience greater exposure to solar radiation, which would accelerate sublimation at its edges [12,17]. In contrast, a smaller pit might grow more slowly [17,19]. The sublimation rate may not be constant over time; it could increase as the pit grows larger, because a larger area would expose more CO2 ice to the atmosphere [17,30]. Additionally, a pit’s size and depth influence the amount of material that can sublimate, making the growth rate non-linear rather than strictly linear as the pits evolve [17,19,30]. Modeling sublimation using in situ analogs and thermophysical layering improves predictions of pit morphology over time [29].
At the poles, the atmosphere condenses into the seasonal caps, where CO2 and water vapor freeze out of the atmosphere and accumulate as ice. High-resolution climate models now incorporate CO2 cloud microphysics that reveal greater spatial variability in polar sublimation rates [31]. These seasonal caps, which grow and recede with the changing seasons, are strongly influenced by the global Hadley cells that govern Martian atmospheric circulation (Figure 1). The Hadley cells drive the movement of air from the equator toward the poles, with warm air rising at low latitudes and cooler air sinking near the poles. This circulation pattern not only dictates the distribution of atmospheric pressure but also plays a key role in the exchange of gases between the atmosphere and the polar caps [17,30,32,33,34]. Notably, these cells reverse direction between Martian seasons, with the northern hemisphere experiencing a shift in wind patterns during the winter as opposed to the summer [12,17,30,33,34]. This seasonal atmospheric reversal contributes to changes in the rate of CO2 sublimation and condensation, affecting the dynamics of the polar ice caps and, by extension, the pits observed in this study. By analyzing the growth patterns of the pits over time, it becomes evident that the seasonal exchange between sublimated CO2 and the atmosphere is a key factor in the observed pit growth, with the Hadley cells likely influencing the rate and extent of sublimation during each Martian year [12,14,17,19,30]. Recent numerical simulations of pit growth under varying obliquity cycles suggest that present-day rates are relatively high due to orbital forcing [35].
Differences in the estimated start year may result from several factors, including spatial resolution differences, data volume, and the number of features analyzed. Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) [21] utilized both MOC imagery, with spatial resolutions down to tens of meters per pixel, and Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) data at a ~100 m/pixel resolution. In contrast, this study relied exclusively on HiRISE imagery, with a resolution of approximately 0.25 m/pixel, allowing for more precise delineation of individual SCFs. Additionally, the sample sizes differ substantially; Byrne and Ingersoll (2003) analyzed approximately 370 features, whereas this investigation tracked a smaller set of features over a longer temporal baseline of nine Earth years [21]. A larger number of features typically results in a broader range of estimated formation ages due to the inclusion of morphologically diverse examples. In situ validation through rover-based imaging remains a future goal but may build on analog OBIA methods tested in Earth deserts [6].
Although research on Swiss cheese feature evolution remains a specialized topic, numerous studies since the early 2000s have examined SCF formation, growth rates, and related processes on the RSPC. These features are unusual in that they evolve over timescales of a few hundred years, unlike most geological processes typically studied over thousands to millions of years. These studies contribute to a broader understanding of Martian paleoclimate, as the growth and retreat of polar deposits offer a time-resolved signal of atmospheric evolution [13].

5. Conclusions

This project explored the effectiveness of object-based image analysis (OBIA) techniques for accelerating the study of Swiss cheese features (SCFs) on Mars’ South Polar Residual Cap (RSPC). SCF identification was achieved by developing a semi-automated workflow using high-resolution HiRISE images. Image segmentation and classification were conducted in the Trimble eCognition software, while initial manual identification and post-processing of polygon measurements were performed in Esri’s ArcGIS Pro 2. Although OBIA is widely utilized in Earth sciences, its application to planetary surfaces has been limited. The results of this study demonstrate that OBIA can significantly streamline image-object extraction and analysis for planetary imagery.
An analysis of pit growth rates and extrapolated formation ages suggests that the SCFs currently observed formed between Martian years 7 and 16, approximately corresponding to Earth years 1976 to 1998. This finding supports the interpretation that these features are geologically young and actively evolving under present-day climatic conditions. The workflow developed here demonstrates the scalability of OBIA methods and could be readily adapted for the study of other Martian regions experiencing seasonal or climate-driven surface changes [36].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and supervision of R.D.C. was provided by the coauthors V.F.C. and J.A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the NASA Mars Data Analysis Program, grant number #80NSSC21K1089.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study, including segmented SCF shapefiles, eCognition rulesets, HiRISE image metadata, and ArcMap project files, are openly available in the Zenodo repository at 10.5281/zenodo.15742713. All datasets used or generated during the analysis are included in the archive. No custom code was used in this study. HiRISE images used as input are publicly available through the NASA Planetary Data System (https://pds-imaging.jpl.nasa.gov/).

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Paul Knightly and Adam Barnes of the University of Arkansas their advice and assistance in this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SCFsSwiss cheese features
CO2Carbon dioxide
MROMars Reconnaissance Orbiter
OBIAObject-based image analysis
HiRISEHigh-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment
MYMartian year
GEOBIAGeographic Object-Based Image Analysis
Trimble eCognition(Proper name, not abbreviated further in text)
CCDCharged-Coupled Device
HRSCHigh-Resolution Stereo Camera
LPSCLunar and Planetary Science Conference
SPRCSouth Polar Residual Cap
H2OWater
MOCMars Orbiter Camera
GLCMGray-level co-occurrence matrix
GISGeographic Information System
R2Coefficient of determination
RSPCResidual South Polar Cap
THEMISThermal Emission Imaging System
LsSolar Longitude
EEarth year (in regression equation)
RMost recent image acquisition year (in regression equation)
APit age in Martian years (in regression equation)
LMartian year length in Earth days (in regression equation)
DEarth year length in Earth days (in regression equation)

References

  1. Blaschke, T.; Lang, S.; Hay, G.J. (Eds.) Object-Based Image Analysis: Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-Driven Remote Sensing Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaschke, T.; Hay, G.J.; Kelly, M.; Lang, S.; Hofmann, P.; Addink, E.; Queiroz Feitosa, R.; van der Meer, F.; van der Werff, H.; van Coillie, F.; et al. Geographic object-based image analysis—Towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 87, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Duro, D.C.; Franklin, S.E.; Dubé, M.G. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hossain, M.D.; Chen, D. Segmentation for Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA): A review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2019, 150, 115–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Myint, S.W.; Gober, P.; Brazel, A.; Grossman-Clarke, S.; Weng, Q. Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1145–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zaman, B.; Khan, A.; Rao, A. Remote Sensing-Based OBIA for Arid Terrain Monitoring: Lessons for Mars. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1653. [Google Scholar]
  7. Addink, E.A.; De Jong, S.M.; Pebesma, E.J. The importance of scale in object-based mapping of vegetation parameters with hyperspectral imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007, 73, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Colwell, R.N. Aerial photography—A valuable remote-sensing tool for the scientist. Am. Sci. 1965, 53, 6–24. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu, B.; Li, J.; Shen, H.; Zhang, L. Object-Based Classification of Urban Scenes Using a Support Vector Machine. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 198. [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith, A.B.; Johnson, C.L.; Lee, D.M. Object-Based Image Analysis of Martian Impact Craters Using HiRISE DEMs. In Proceedings of the 55th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 11–15 March 2024. [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomas, P.C.; James, P.B.; Calvin, W.M.; Haberle, R.; Malin, M.C. Residual south polar cap of Mars: Stratigraphy, history, and implications of recent changes. Icarus 2009, 203, 352–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kieffer, H.H. Mars south polar spring and summer temperatures: A residual CO2 frost. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1979, 84, 8263–8288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Madeleine, J.-B.; Forget, F.; Millour, E. Solar Longitude Control of Seasonal CO2 Condensation on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2016, 121, 377–391. [Google Scholar]
  14. Forget, F. Mars CO2 Ice Polar Caps. In Solar System Ices; Schmitt, B., De Bergh, C., Festou, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 477–507. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bibring, J.-P.; Langevin, Y.; Poulet, F.; Gendrin, A.; Gondet, B.; Berthé, M.; Soufflot, A.; Drossart, P.; Forget, F.; Vago, J.L.; et al. Perennial water ice identified in the south polar cap of Mars. Nature 2004, 428, 627–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thomas, P.C.; Malin, M.C.; Edgett, K.S.; Carr, M.H.; Hartmann, W.K.; Ingersoll, A.P.; James, P.B.; Danielson, G.E.; Ravine, M.A.; Soulanille, T.A.; et al. North–south geological differences between the residual polar caps on Mars. Nature 2000, 404, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Titus, T.N.; Kieffer, H.H.; Christensen, P.R. Exposed water ice discovered near the south pole of Mars. Science 2003, 299, 1048–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Byrne, S. The Polar Deposits of Mars. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2009, 37, 535–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thomas, P.C.; Malin, M.C.; James, P.B.; Cantor, B.A.; Williams, R.M.E.; Gierasch, P.J. South polar residual cap of Mars: Features, stratigraphy, and changes. Icarus 2005, 174, 535–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, I.B.; Holt, J.W.; Brothers, T.C. Estimating Swiss Cheese Feature Morphologies from HiRISE DTMs. Planet. Space Sci. 2016, 129, 36–47. [Google Scholar]
  21. Byrne, S.; Ingersoll, A.P. A sublimation model for Martian south polar ice features. Science 2003, 299, 1051–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Malin, M.C.; Caplinger, M.A.; Davis, S.D. Observational evidence for an active surface reservoir of solid carbon dioxide on Mars. Science 2001, 294, 2146–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McEwen, A.S.; Eliason, E.M.; Bergstrom, J.W.; Bridges, N.T.; Hansen, C.J.; Delamere, W.A.; Grant, J.A.; Gulick, V.C.; Hale, A.S.; Herkenhoff, K.E.; et al. Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE). J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, E05S02. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tian, J.; Zhu, X. A Review of Remote Sensing Image Object Detection Based on Deep Learning. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, H.; Zhou, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, J. Multiscale Object-Based Image Analysis for Mapping Martian Gullies Using HiRISE Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 442. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cleveland, R.D. An Object-Based Image Analysis of the Swiss Cheese Terrain Evolution on the Martian South Pole. In Proceedings of the 53rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 7–11 March 2022; Available online: https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2022/pdf/2580.pdf#page=1.00 (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  27. Laskar, J.; Levrard, B.; Mustard, J.F. Orbital forcing of the Martian polar layered deposits. Nature 2004, 419, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ojha, L.; Sutton, S.; Mustard, J.F.; Weirich, J.R. Revealing active Mars with HiRISE digital terrain models. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2403. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hayne, P.O.; Aharonson, O.; Schorghofer, N. Sublimation-Driven Evolution of Ice-Rich Features on Mars. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Knightly, J.P.; Fusco, M.S.; Farnsworth, K.; Chevrier, V.F. Temporal variations of Swiss cheese terrain. In Proceedings of the 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 18–22 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Spiga, A.; González-Galindo, F.; Millour, E.; Forget, F.; Navarro, T. Polar Processes in the Martian Climate: A GCM Perspective. Icarus 2017, 287, 207–229. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nye, J.F.; Durham, W.B.; Schenk, P.M.; Moore, J.M. The instability of a south polar cap on Mars composed of carbon dioxide. Icarus 2000, 144, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Houben, H.; Haberle, R.M.; Young, R.E.; Zent, A.P. Modeling the Martian seasonal water cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 1997, 102, 9069–9083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Richardson, M.I.; Wilson, R.J. A topographically forced asymmetry in the Martian circulation and climate. Nature 2002, 416, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Landis, M.E.; Byrne, S.; Piqueux, S. A New Model of Martian CO2 Ice Evolution under Obliquity Variations. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 2018, 123, 2326–2340. [Google Scholar]
  36. Palafox, L.; Bishop, J.L.; Rampe, E.B.; McAdam, A.C. Evaluating Dust and Frost Influence on Martian Surface Features. Planet. Space Sci. 2020, 182, 104823. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. A regional context map showing the site location of the Swiss cheese features used for this study. Base image MOLA mosaic, swath HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930. Credit: NASA/USGS Astrogeology/LPI.
Figure 1. A regional context map showing the site location of the Swiss cheese features used for this study. Base image MOLA mosaic, swath HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930. Credit: NASA/USGS Astrogeology/LPI.
Remotesensing 17 02372 g001
Figure 2. Time series of sublimation pit evolution on the South Polar Residual Cap of Mars. (Top row): HiRISE images showing progressive pit enlargement and morphological change across four Mars years: MY 32.93 (ESP_041094), MY 30.95 (ESP_023569), MY 29.87 (ESP_014140), and MY 28.79 (PSP_004686). (Bottom row): corresponding pit outlines (in red) derived from image segmentation, highlighting consistent areal growth over time.
Figure 2. Time series of sublimation pit evolution on the South Polar Residual Cap of Mars. (Top row): HiRISE images showing progressive pit enlargement and morphological change across four Mars years: MY 32.93 (ESP_041094), MY 30.95 (ESP_023569), MY 29.87 (ESP_014140), and MY 28.79 (PSP_004686). (Bottom row): corresponding pit outlines (in red) derived from image segmentation, highlighting consistent areal growth over time.
Remotesensing 17 02372 g002
Figure 3. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) workflow highlighting various stages used to define objects in the SPRC. The method defines the sublimation pit object: (1) segmentation results; (2) classification outcomes; (3) reshaping using merge tools; and (4) noise control. Background Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930, taken in 2011, courtesy of NASA/JPL/University of Arizona.
Figure 3. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) workflow highlighting various stages used to define objects in the SPRC. The method defines the sublimation pit object: (1) segmentation results; (2) classification outcomes; (3) reshaping using merge tools; and (4) noise control. Background Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930, taken in 2011, courtesy of NASA/JPL/University of Arizona.
Remotesensing 17 02372 g003
Figure 4. Labeled CO2 sublimation pits—also known as Swiss Cheese Features (SCFs)—on the Residual South Polar Cap (RSPC) of Mars. These shallow, round depressions form through seasonal sublimation of carbon dioxide ice. The illumination is from the upper left, with solar azimuth at 331°, and south indicated for orientation. The image is centered at 86.89°S, 353.64°E and spans approximately 6 km. HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930. Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona/USGS Astrogeology/LPI.
Figure 4. Labeled CO2 sublimation pits—also known as Swiss Cheese Features (SCFs)—on the Residual South Polar Cap (RSPC) of Mars. These shallow, round depressions form through seasonal sublimation of carbon dioxide ice. The illumination is from the upper left, with solar azimuth at 331°, and south indicated for orientation. The image is centered at 86.89°S, 353.64°E and spans approximately 6 km. HiRISE image ESP_023570_0930. Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona/USGS Astrogeology/LPI.
Remotesensing 17 02372 g004
Figure 5. Growth trajectories of sublimation pits on Mars’ South Polar Residual Cap as a function of Martian year. Each line represents a linear regression model fitted to the area evolution of a single pit based on object-based measurements from four HiRISE images acquired between MY 29.2 and 33.3. Marker shapes and colors distinguish individual pits, using a colorblind-accessible palette. Regression lines are extrapolated back to Martian year 0 to estimate formation timing. The high linearity of the trends (R2 ≈ 1) suggests consistent areal expansion over time, likely driven by seasonal CO2 sublimation processes.
Figure 5. Growth trajectories of sublimation pits on Mars’ South Polar Residual Cap as a function of Martian year. Each line represents a linear regression model fitted to the area evolution of a single pit based on object-based measurements from four HiRISE images acquired between MY 29.2 and 33.3. Marker shapes and colors distinguish individual pits, using a colorblind-accessible palette. Regression lines are extrapolated back to Martian year 0 to estimate formation timing. The high linearity of the trends (R2 ≈ 1) suggests consistent areal expansion over time, likely driven by seasonal CO2 sublimation processes.
Remotesensing 17 02372 g005
Table 1. Results of the validation test comparing manual and OBIA measurements. Includes summary of pit areas and regression model parameters from HiRISE image PSP_004687_0930.
Table 1. Results of the validation test comparing manual and OBIA measurements. Includes summary of pit areas and regression model parameters from HiRISE image PSP_004687_0930.
PitArea (m2)OBIA Area (m2)Manual Area (m2)% DifferenceSlope (m2/MY)InterceptR2Est. Start (MY)
O36,955.2541,79841,3880.98%3132.86−55,585.160.99717.74
Q33,293.2537,58237,4920.44%2437.26−37,772.560.99415.50
T39,316.0043,22842,7960.99%2676.20−39,833.300.99914.88
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cleveland, R.D.; Chevrier, V.F.; Tullis, J.A. Framework for Mapping Sublimation Features on Mars’ South Polar Cap Using Object-Based Image Analysis. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142372

AMA Style

Cleveland RD, Chevrier VF, Tullis JA. Framework for Mapping Sublimation Features on Mars’ South Polar Cap Using Object-Based Image Analysis. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(14):2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cleveland, Racine D., Vincent F. Chevrier, and Jason A. Tullis. 2025. "Framework for Mapping Sublimation Features on Mars’ South Polar Cap Using Object-Based Image Analysis" Remote Sensing 17, no. 14: 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142372

APA Style

Cleveland, R. D., Chevrier, V. F., & Tullis, J. A. (2025). Framework for Mapping Sublimation Features on Mars’ South Polar Cap Using Object-Based Image Analysis. Remote Sensing, 17(14), 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142372

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop