Land-Use Composition, Distribution Patterns, and Influencing Factors of Villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, Based on UAV Photogrammetry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Area and Data Source
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Source
2.2.1. UAV Remote Sensing Data
2.2.2. Satellite Remote Sensing Data
2.2.3. Statistical Data
2.3. Data Processing Methodology
2.3.1. Classification System
2.3.2. Image Segmentation
2.3.3. Feature Extraction
2.3.4. Classifier Selection
2.3.5. Rural Land Classification
2.3.6. Evaluation of the Accuracy
2.4. Analytical Methods
2.4.1. Redundancy Analysis
2.4.2. Shape Index
3. Results
3.1. Assessment of Classification Accuracy
3.2. Rural Land-Use Composition
3.3. Village Distribution Patterns
3.3.1. Distribution Characteristics
3.3.2. Diverse Structure of Pattern
3.4. Analysis of Influencing Factors
4. Discussion
4.1. Feasibility of Land-Use Classification Techniques
4.2. Spatial Differentiation of Rural Land-Use Composition
4.3. Mechanisms of Influencing Factors
4.4. Suggestions for Reasonable Planning
- (1)
- Use of ultra-high-resolution UAV remote sensing data. It is also necessary to regularly collect and update data. In this study, the relevant government agencies provided us with publicly accessible sources for infrastructure information around villages. This is an effective way to understand the surrounding natural and socio-economic conditions, facilitating better UAV photography work. On the basis of these high-resolution drone remote sensing images, the analysis and processing of land-use maps help reveal an overall understanding of the land-use composition [58]. This more targeted approach aids in village planning, improving rural living environments effectively. This will support the implementation of rural revitalization strategies in the local region.
- (2)
- Optimization of green space layout based on climate conditions. Through the analysis, it was found that the three natural factors of MAT, elevation, and AP have a significant impact on the land use of the villages in the Hehuang Valley. Therefore, in the process of village transformation and improvement to increase the proportion of green space planning, enhance the integration of villages with the surrounding ecological environment, and improve overall ecological benefits, it is advisable to use more local tree species adapted to the local climate (in terms of temperature and precipitation) for village greening [59], instead of blindly pursuing aesthetics. In terms of elevation, the corresponding landscape layout positions and patterns should be determined based on different elevation characteristics and the local micro-landforms of the villages. Therefore, in future rural planning and the upgrading of rural living environments, it is crucial to comprehensively consider the specific natural geographical features of the local area. This will help local governments make decisions scientifically, effectively serving the rural revitalization strategy locally.
4.5. Limitations and Future Prospects
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Using UAV remote sensing images with the object-based human-assisted land-use classification approach enables the land to be classified with a high accuracy of 96.86%.
- (2)
- In impervious surface areas, the proportions of land for construction and road use are 33.01% ± 8.89% and 17.76% ± 6.92%, respectively, exceeding 50% in total. The sum of forest land, grassland, and cropland area exceeds 40%, of which the proportion of forest land is 16.41% ± 7.80% and that of grassland is 6.19% ± 6.48%.
- (3)
- The average size of the villages is 25.85 ± 17.93 hm2, which is below the national average. The distribution patterns of the villages are relatively scattered, with most being concentrated on both sides of the main roads.
- (4)
- The contributions of MAT, elevation, and AP contributing to the land-use composition are 50.56%, 30.00%, and 12.51%, respectively, making them the dominant factors affecting land-use composition. Among them, MAT and AP have particularly significant effects on forest land, grassland, and built-up land.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shi, J.; Yang, X. Sustainable Development Levels and Influence Factors in Rural China Based on Rural Revitalization Strategy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, X.; Ye, C. The Integration of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Strategies in China: Origin, Reality and Future Trends. Land 2021, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.; Fang, Y.; Jin, X.; Zhou, Y. Monitoring the Effects of Land Consolidation on the Ecological Environmental Quality Based on Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China. Land Use Policy 2020, 95, 104569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Yang, J.; Sun, W.; He, B. Suitability of Human Settlements in Mountainous Areas from the Perspective of Ventilation: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Chongqing. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 310, 127467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Li, W.; Zhu, G.; Zhou, H.; Yan, H.; Xue, P. Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Their Driving Factors in the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau Based on Geographical Detectors and Google Earth Engine: A Case Study in Gannan Prefecture. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radočaj, D.; Obhođaš, J.; Jurišić, M.; Gašparović, M. Global Open Data Remote Sensing Satellite Missions for Land Monitoring and Conservation: A Review. Land 2020, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiatkowska, B.; Słodczyk, J.; Stokowska, A. Spatial-Temporal Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Urban Areas Using Remote Sensing Images and GIS Analysis: The Case Study of Opole, Poland. Geosciences 2021, 11, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.; Dong, J.; Hamm, N.A.S.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Xing, H.; Fu, P. Integrating Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data for Urban Land Use Mapping: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 103, 102514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, W. 40-Year (1978–2017) Human Settlement Changes in China Reflected by Impervious Surfaces from Satellite Remote Sensing. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pengra, B.W.; Stehman, S.V.; Horton, J.A.; Dockter, D.J.; Schroeder, T.A.; Yang, Z.; Cohen, W.B.; Healey, S.P.; Loveland, T.R. Quality Control and Assessment of Interpreter Consistency of Annual Land Cover Reference Data in an Operational National Monitoring Program. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 238, 111261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Du, Z.; Dong, R.; Zheng, J.; Tu, Y.; Chen, X.; Hao, P.; Zhong, B.; Peng, D.; Zhao, J.; et al. FROM-GLC Plus: Toward near Real-Time and Multi-Resolution Land Cover Mapping. GISci. Remote Sens. 2022, 59, 1026–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potapov, P.; Hansen, M.C.; Pickens, A.; Hernandez-Serna, A.; Tyukavina, A.; Turubanova, S.; Zalles, V.; Li, X.; Khan, A.; Stolle, F.; et al. The Global 2000–2020 Land Cover and Land Use Change Dataset Derived From the Landsat Archive: First Results. Front. Remote Sens. 2022, 3, 856903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venter, Z.S.; Barton, D.N.; Chakraborty, T.; Simensen, T.; Singh, G. Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: A Comparison of Dynamic World, World Cover and Esri Land Cover. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, C.F.; Brumby, S.P.; Guzder-Williams, B.; Birch, T.; Hyde, S.B.; Mazzariello, J.; Czerwinski, W.; Pasquarella, V.J.; Haertel, R.; Ilyushchenko, S.; et al. Dynamic World, Near Real-Time Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Mapping. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phan, T.N.; Kuch, V.; Lehnert, L.W. Land Cover Classification Using Google Earth Engine and Random Forest Classifier—The Role of Image Composition. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H.; Khazaei, M.; Alavipanah, S.K.; Weng, Q. Google Earth Engine for Large-Scale Land Use and Land Cover Mapping: An Object-Based Classification Approach Using Spectral, Textural and Topographical Factors. GISci. Remote Sens. 2021, 58, 914–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, J.F.; Tollerud, H.J.; Barber, C.P.; Zhou, Q.; Dwyer, J.L.; Vogelmann, J.E.; Loveland, T.R.; Woodcock, C.E.; Stehman, S.V.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Lessons Learned Implementing an Operational Continuous United States National Land Change Monitoring Capability: The Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) Approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 238, 111356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, X.; Li, X.; Dang, D.; Dou, H.; Wang, K.; Lou, A. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Remote Sensing in Grassland Ecosystem Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Tian, T.; Yin, J. A Review of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Low-Altitude Remote Sensing (UAV-LARS) Use in Agricultural Monitoring in China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guimarães, N.; Pádua, L.; Marques, P.; Silva, N.; Peres, E.; Sousa, J.J. Forestry Remote Sensing from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Review Focusing on the Data, Processing and Potentialities. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhu, L. A Review on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing: Platforms, Sensors, Data Processing Methods, and Applications. Drones 2023, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tmušić, G.; Manfreda, S.; Aasen, H.; James, M.R.; Gonçalves, G.; Ben-Dor, E.; Brook, A.; Polinova, M.; Arranz, J.J.; Mészáros, J.; et al. Current Practices in UAS-Based Environmental Monitoring. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Deng, L.; Liu, X.; Zhu, L. Application of UAV-Based Multi-Angle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in Fine Vegetation Classification. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elamin, A.; El-Rabbany, A. UAV-Based Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for Urban Land Cover Mapping Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mollick, T.; Azam, M.G.; Karim, S. Geospatial-Based Machine Learning Techniques for Land Use and Land Cover Mapping Using a High-Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Image. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2023, 29, 100859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, X.; Lee, H.F.; Cui, M.; Cheng, G.; Zhao, Y.; Ding, H.; Yue, R.P.H.; Lu, H. Differentiations of Geographic Distribution and Subsistence Strategies between Tibetan and Other Major Ethnic Groups Are Determined by the Physical Environment in Hehuang Valley. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2019, 62, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yan, J.; Peng, T. How Does Rural Labor Migration Affect Crop Diversification for Adapting to Climate Change in the Hehuang Valley, Tibetan Plateau? Land Use Policy 2022, 113, 105928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haixin, Z.; Yimei, H.; Shaoshan, A.; Haohao, L.; Xiaoqian, D.; Pan, W.; Mengyuan, F. Land-Use Patterns Determine the Distribution of Soil Microplastics in Typical Agricultural Areas on the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 426, 127806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S. 1-Km Monthly Precipitation Dataset for China (1901–2022). Natl. Tibet. Plateau/Third Pole Environ. Data Cent. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, S. 1-Km Monthly Mean Temperature Dataset for China (1901–2022). Natl. Tibet. Plateau/Third Pole Environ. Data Center. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Yu, B.; Yang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, S.; Qian, X.; Wang, C.; Wu, B.; Wu, J. An Extended Time-Series (2000–2023) of Global NPP-VIIRS-like Nighttime Light Data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2020, 2020, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, J.; Liu, J.; Kuang, W.; Xu, X.; Zhang, S.; Yan, C.; Li, R.; Wu, S.; Hu, Y.; Du, G.; et al. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Characteristics of Land-Use Change in China during 2010–2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Huang, X. 30 m Annual Land Cover and Its Dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 3907–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boateng, E.Y.; Otoo, J.; Abaye, D.A. Basic Tenets of Classification Algorithms K-Nearest-Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Neural Network: A Review. J. Data Anal. Inf. Process. 2020, 8, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Sun, S.; Liang, D.; Jia, Z. Spatial–Temporal Variations of NDVI and Its Response to Climate in China from 2001 to 2020. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2022, 15, 1463–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Z.; Xu, J.; Guo, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, G. Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification for Urban Village Using a Worldview Satellite Image Based on U-Net. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duro, D.C.; Franklin, S.E.; Dubé, M.G. A Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Image Analysis with Selected Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Agricultural Landscapes Using SPOT-5 HRG Imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sefrin, O.; Riese, F.M.; Keller, S. Deep Learning for Land Cover Change Detection. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Han, L.; Han, L.; Zhu, L. How Well Do Deep Learning-Based Methods for Land Cover Classification and Object Detection Perform on High Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery? Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, J.; Wu, J.; Xiao, C.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J. The Classification Method Study of Crops Remote Sensing with Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashaei, M.; Kamangir, H.; Starek, M.J.; Tissot, P. Review and Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Efficient Land Cover Mapping with UAS Hyper-Spatial Imagery: A Case Study Over a Wetland. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Tu, Y.; Song, Y.; Theobald, D.M.; Zhang, T.; Ren, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Mapping Essential Urban Land Use Categories with Open Big Data: Results for Five Metropolitan Areas in the United States of America. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2021, 178, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Li, M.; Ma, X.; Cheng, L.; Du, P.; Liu, Y. A Review of Supervised Object-Based Land-Cover Image Classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 130, 277–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sun, W.; Li, S.; Wang, F.; Yang, G. A Coarse-to-Fine Deep Learning Based Land Use Change Detection Method for High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osco, L.P.; Marcato Junior, J.; Marques Ramos, A.P.; de Castro Jorge, L.A.; Fatholahi, S.N.; de Andrade Silva, J.; Matsubara, E.T.; Pistori, H.; Gonçalves, W.N.; Li, J. A Review on Deep Learning in UAV Remote Sensing. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 102, 102456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Harrison, P.A.; Pan, X.; Li, H.; Sargent, I.; Atkinson, P.M. Scale Sequence Joint Deep Learning (SS-JDL) for Land Use and Land Cover Classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 237, 111593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, G.; Park, K.; Song, B.; Lee, H. Analyzing Impact of Types of UAV-Derived Images on the Object-Based Classification of Land Cover in an Urban Area. Drones 2022, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Najjar, H.A.H.; Kalantar, B.; Pradhan, B.; Saeidi, V.; Halin, A.A.; Ueda, N.; Mansor, S. Land Cover Classification from Fused DSM and UAV Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, H.; Qin, R.; Chen, X. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing Applications—A Review. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Jiang, G.; Wu, S.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, T.; Tian, Y.; Chen, T. Cropland-Grassland Use Conversions in the Agro-Pastoral Areas of the Tibetan Plateau: Spatiotemporal Pattern and Driving Mechanisms. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 146, 109819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, P.; Gao, Y.; Ou, Y.; McJeon, H.; Zhang, X.; Ye, S.; Wang, Y.; Song, C. Fulfilling Global Climate Pledges Can Lead to Major Increase in Forest Land on Tibetan Plateau. iScience 2023, 26, 106364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Zou, H.; Bachelot, B.; Dong, T.; Zhu, Z.; Liao, Y.; Plenković-Moraj, A.; Wu, Y. Predicting the Responses of Subalpine Forest Landscape Dynamics to Climate Change on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 4352–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, Y.; Xin, Z.; Dor-ji, T.; Wang, Y. Tibetan Plateau Greening Driven by Warming-wetting Climate Change and Ecological Restoration in the 21st Century. Land Degrad Dev. 2022, 33, 2407–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Dai, E.; Jia, L.; Wang, Y.; Huang, A.; Liao, L.; Cai, L.; Fan, D. Assessment of Multiple Factors and Interactions Affecting Grassland Degradation on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 154, 110509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, N.; Ren, X.; He, H.; Zhang, L.; Niu, Z. Precipitation Conditions Constrain the Sensitivity of Aboveground Net Primary Productivity in Tibetan Plateau Grasslands to Climate Change. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Wang, T.; Xiao, J.; Wang, K.; Yu, W.; Du, Z.; Huang, L.; Yue, T. Grassland Productivity Increase Was Dominated by Climate in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from 1982 to 2020. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 434, 140144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhou, T.; Jiang, G.; Li, G.; Zhou, D.; Luo, Y. Spatial Pattern and Mechanisms of Farmland Abandonment in Agricultural and Pastoral Areas of Qingzang Plateau. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 2, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. Introduction to Land Use and Rural Sustainability in China. Land Use Policy 2018, 74, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peili, S.; Lili, Z.; Tiancai, Z.; Ge, H.; Guangshuai, Z. Considerations of Forest Distribution and Native Tree Species for Afforestation in the High Altitudes on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. JORE 2022, 13, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, R.; Yang, C.; Li, E.; Cai, X.; Yang, J.; Xia, Y. Object-Based Wetland Vegetation Classification Using Multi-Feature Selection of Unoccupied Aerial Vehicle RGB Imagery. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayhan, B.; Kwan, C. Tree, Shrub, and Grass Classification Using Only RGB Images. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Land-Use Type | Built-Up Land | Cropland | Forest Land | Grassland | Road Land | Bare Area | Water | UA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Built-up Land | 445 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 98.02% |
Cropland | 2 | 163 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 94.77% |
Forest Land | 2 | 3 | 165 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 95.93% |
Grassland | 0 | 1 | 2 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95.29% |
Road Land | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 133 | 0 | 0 | 97.79% |
Bare Area | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 96.55% |
Water | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.00% |
PA | 98.45% | 96.45% | 95.38% | 93.10% | 99.25% | 93.33% | 77.78% | |
OA: 96.86% Kappa: 0.95 |
Region | Method | Building | Road | Unused | Water | Farm | Grass | Forest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern villages | Mean | 27.81% | 13.11% | 7.13% | 2.54% | 25.66% | 11.76% | 11.99% |
SD | 5.77% | 3.59% | 5.82% | 3.48% | 12.76% | 7.35% | 5.53% | |
Middle villages | Mean | 34.32% | 19.02% | 5.21% | 0.24% | 21.01% | 4.86% | 15.33% |
SD | 9.38% | 6.72% | 3.69% | 0.87% | 10.28% | 5.76% | 6.26% | |
Southern villages | Mean | 32.94% | 17.42% | 10.62% | 0.04% | 8.70% | 6.00% | 24.28% |
SD | 7.56% | 7.98% | 5.56% | 0.12% | 6.64% | 5.33% | 9.09% | |
Total region | Mean | 0.58% | 6.51% | 17.76% | 6.19% | 16.41% | 19.54% | 33.01% |
SD | 1.80% | 4.93% | 6.92% | 6.48% | 7.80% | 11.52% | 8.89% |
Distribution Pattern Types | Number | Distribution Patterns and Structure | |
---|---|---|---|
Green Space | Residential Space | ||
Strip Type | 21 | Village roads, water systems, and protective green spaces are highly impacted by traffic and river flow, with clear linear features. | Most of the layout along the road or river has a concentrated and contiguous distribution, with some rural areas experiencing hollowing out and significant damage to residential buildings. |
Mixed-Concentrated Type | 12 | Village roads, water systems, and protective green spaces are distributed sporadically within the village. | The development space is constrained, and the rural compounds are restricted, leading to a hollowing out of the countryside, severe damage to residential buildings, and fragmented distribution of distribution patterns. |
Concentrated type | 15 | A small number of village roads, water systems, and protective green spaces are scattered throughout the village. | The distance to the urban area is relatively small, with a high level of urbanization. Most residential space is characterized by concentrated and contiguous distribution, and some residences have been converted into high-rise buildings. |
Point Type | 7 | The village roads, water systems, and protective green spaces are highly influenced by the terrain, with high ecological benefits. | Rural hollowing out occurs, traditional dwellings remain relatively intact, and the distribution patterns are distributed in a scattered point-like manner. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, X.; Xin, Z. Land-Use Composition, Distribution Patterns, and Influencing Factors of Villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, Based on UAV Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122213
Li X, Xin Z. Land-Use Composition, Distribution Patterns, and Influencing Factors of Villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, Based on UAV Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(12):2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122213
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Xiaoyu, and Zhongbao Xin. 2024. "Land-Use Composition, Distribution Patterns, and Influencing Factors of Villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, Based on UAV Photogrammetry" Remote Sensing 16, no. 12: 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122213
APA StyleLi, X., & Xin, Z. (2024). Land-Use Composition, Distribution Patterns, and Influencing Factors of Villages in the Hehuang Valley, Qinghai, China, Based on UAV Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing, 16(12), 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122213