Next Article in Journal
Landslide Risk Assessment in Eastern Kentucky, USA: Developing a Regional Scale, Limited Resource Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Activities to Promote the Moon as an Absolute Calibration Reference
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Quality Instance-Segmentation Network for Floating-Algae Detection Using RGB Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Improved Altimeter in-Orbit Range Noise-Level Estimation Approach Based on Along-Track Differential Method

1
Beijing Institute of Radio Measurement, Beijing 100854, China
2
The Graduate School of Second Academy of China Aerospace, Beijing 100854, China
3
Laboratory for Ocean and Climate Dynamics, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(24), 6250; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246250
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022

Abstract

Satellite radar altimeters are advanced remote sensing devices that play an important role in observing the global marine environment. Accurately estimating the noise level of altimeter in-orbit ranging data is crucial for evaluating the payload performance, analyzing sea conditions, and monitoring data quality. In this study, we propose an approach based on the differential processing of along-track odd–even data sequences for altimeter in-orbit range noise-level estimation. Using the long-term along-track data sequence can notably improve the issue in the existing method in that the noise level is underestimated owing to the utilization of a relatively short data segment. On the basis of an analysis of the influence of low-frequency components on noise-level estimation, the mathematical formulas of the above differential method were deduced, and the efficacy of the approach in assessing the noise level of altimeter in-orbit data was demonstrated by simulation experiments. This method was used to estimate the noise levels of the 20 Hz datasets of Jason-3 and Sentinel-6, and the idea of the time-domain difference was extended to the frequency domain. The statistical results showed that the 20 Hz noise levels at the significant wave height (SWH) = 2 m were 7.41 cm (Jason-3 low-resolution (LR) mode), 6.66 cm (Sentinel-6 LR mode), and 3.13 cm (Sentinel-6 high-resolution (HR) mode). The power spectrum density analysis further verified its accuracy. By reprocessing the 20 Hz data of Sentinel-6 into 10, 5, and 1 Hz, the effectiveness of the along-track odd–even differential method to directly evaluate the noise level of 1 Hz data was explored, and the impact of ocean signals such as swells on noise-level estimation in synthetic aperture mode was discussed.
Keywords: altimeter in-orbit noise level; along-track differential method; power spectrum density analysis; Sentinel-6; ocean swells altimeter in-orbit noise level; along-track differential method; power spectrum density analysis; Sentinel-6; ocean swells

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Kong, W.; Sun, H.; Xu, Y.; Lu, Y. An Improved Altimeter in-Orbit Range Noise-Level Estimation Approach Based on Along-Track Differential Method. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246250

AMA Style

Liu X, Kong W, Sun H, Xu Y, Lu Y. An Improved Altimeter in-Orbit Range Noise-Level Estimation Approach Based on Along-Track Differential Method. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(24):6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246250

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xiaonan, Weiya Kong, Hanwei Sun, Yongsheng Xu, and Yaobing Lu. 2022. "An Improved Altimeter in-Orbit Range Noise-Level Estimation Approach Based on Along-Track Differential Method" Remote Sensing 14, no. 24: 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246250

APA Style

Liu, X., Kong, W., Sun, H., Xu, Y., & Lu, Y. (2022). An Improved Altimeter in-Orbit Range Noise-Level Estimation Approach Based on Along-Track Differential Method. Remote Sensing, 14(24), 6250. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246250

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop