1. Introduction
Global ecosystem services are finite resources stressed by global environmental change with pressures from both natural processes and human activities [
1]. According to the United Nations World Population Report, nearly 55% of the world population lives in urban areas, while a significant percentage (90%) of Sub-Saharan Africans (SSA) live in rural areas [
2]. Most of Africa’s population is dependent on the land for subsistence farming, small human settlements, and raw materials from forests [
3]. Malawi’s 9.4 million hectares (ha) of land exemplifies these concerns and national environmental resources face increasing pressures [
4]. In Malawi, 61.4% of all land is in agricultural production [
5] accounting for over 38% of Malawi’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and providing livelihoods for 85% of Malawi’s population, which is largely smallholder farmers [
1].
More than 1.6 million smallholder farmers in Malawi grow maize as the primary crop, cultivating an average of 0.4 hectares of land [
1]. Regular droughts, as well as limited availability of input resources for soil amendments exacerbated by over-cultivation of soils, threaten crop yields [
6,
7,
8,
9]. Moreover, the high demand for forest products and lack of energy alternatives to firewood and charcoal have contributed to deforestation, and forest and land degradation [
10]. Land-tenure insecurity also remains a challenge along with the slow implementation of land reforms [
11].
The government of Malawi has applied short- and long-term localized-national strategies (labeled the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS)) to advance agricultural development aimed at food and nutrition security, as well as improving economic growth and infrastructure development [
12,
13]. Recently, the Malawi government launched the Vision 2063 plan, the end of which corresponds to 100 years of self-governance in Malawi. Vision 2063 commits to addressing the interconnected challenges through improved governance in land tenure systems and sustainable land management, emphasizing the role of public–private partnerships and transformations through investments in community engagement [
12,
13].
Land cover and land use are inherently coupled. To capture these related systems, indicators of anthropogenic changes are often quantified in the form of land use land cover (LULC) change trajectories using remote sensing imagery as well as models of driving factors and predicted land-cover changes [
14,
15,
16,
17]. Methodological advances enable the integration of imagery and underlying drivers. For example, Markov Chains embedded within diverse statistical models are good predictors of the probability of land cover change [
18,
19,
20]. Advanced computation, such as Cellular Automata-Markov chain spatial modeling, predicts changes using a set of replicable rules, and are robust approaches when applied together more so than individually [
21,
22,
23].
Previous studies that have utilized robust statistical techniques and algorithms in land use retrieval include the use of the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm to identify non-linear relationships in land use/land cover change for rural to urban transition in Hyderabad, Pakistan [
24]; the use of integrated approaches, including landscape fragmentation, machine learning algorithm and fuzzy logic model to determine built-up expansion probability in English Bazar Block, West Bengal, India [
25]; as well as the use of multiple classifiers (SVM, Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Random Forest (RF) with multi-modal imageries (Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2) to understand unique spatial landscape features such as natural resource distribution, human settlements and cultural landscapes in the Sahel region of Niamey, Niger [
26].
Recently, studies using Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), a neural networking model together with Markov Chain (MC) to model spatiotemporal land-cover change based on driving factors such as socio-environmental variables across landscapes have emerged. One study used an MLP-MC predictive model to analyze dynamic rural landscapes with complex environmental gradients across the Eastern Mediterranean region in Turkey, and the results showed human-induced land conversion as well as positive trends of afforestation [
27]. Other studies using predictive models show rapid urban expansion of Jodhpur and Patna in India, respectively [
28,
29]. Neural networks have been used to show land cover transitions caused by deforestation [
30], as well as to model intense urbanization around major historical sites such as the Great Pyramids in Cairo, Egypt to assist decision-makers in sustainable development planning [
16].
In Malawi, past studies used LULCC scenario-based analyses to assess the impacts of human activities including management strategies and practices, on forest cover [
31,
32,
33]. Other studies examined spatiotemporal land-cover change in Malawi’s river catchment areas [
34,
35] or forest-cover change and modeling of carbon emissions crucial for developing national forest monitoring systems and improving REDD+ project design and implementation [
36]. Two studies modeled Malawi’s streamflow and sediment transfer in water catchment areas using MLP neural networks [
37,
38], and recently, [
39] developed a CA-Markov Chain model for land-cover changes and predictions for 2025 and 2035 to show an increase in agricultural lands while reporting decreases in other land covers.
Our study attempts to quantify, simulate, and predict spatiotemporal dynamics across two heterogenous landscapes to understand anthropogenic and environmental processes embedding short- and long-term drivers that affect future land management and policy planning in Malawi. We focus on two rural districts in Central Malawi that are similar in many social-environmental aspects but present quite differently. The objectives are: (1) to determine land use and land cover (LULC) change for two districts in central Malawi using three-time epochs (2001, 2009, and 2019), (2) to determine the main drivers of LULC changes in both districts between 2001 and 2019 and (3) to use the observed drivers to simulate and predict future land use and cover scenario for 2050. The outcome from this study gives quantifiable spatial-temporal information that can inform short-medium term policies at the district level to promote sustainable landscape management aligned with Malawi’s Vision 2063.
4. Discussion
Our land-cover change findings for Dedza and Ntcheu districts demonstrate low stability, with the agriculture class showing continued dominance, but transitions vary across the change periods. The findings that gains in the agricultural area were higher during 2009–2019 than during 2001–2009 for Dedza, while the reverse was true for Ntcheu, i.e., higher gains during 2001–2009 than from 2009 to 2019 might reflect the different initial states for the two districts. Dedza started off in 2001 with nearly half of the land already in agriculture and over a third in combined forest and wetland cover area, and the higher population growth accelerated the conversion of mainly forest and wetlands to agriculture during 2009–2019. The continuing degraded state of Ntcheu reflected in a near doubling of shrub-woodland during 2001–2009 combined with a steeper decline from the higher starting cover wetland, might account for the higher increase in agricultural land use. This might also reflect a growing trend in irrigated agriculture of wetlands locally called
dimba during the dry season. Overall, population growth related to driving forces and terrain drivers such as lower slope and elevation accelerate land conversion to agriculture and account for observed increases in agricultural area as well as in settlement building, as noted in earlier findings [
5,
10].
The increase in barren areas during 2001–2019 in both districts suggests land-cover clearance or abandonment. This could be explained by farm practices where farmers burn or incorporate crop residues while making ridges after a harvest season, as well as by some land areas left bare of ground cover and undergoing localized soil erosion during rainfall events [
61,
62]. Moreover, these practices have become more challenging given the current limited use of fallows and diverse crop rotations on declining sizes of land holdings due to population pressures and lagging adjustments to government policies on land allocation [
7]. The much larger increase (near doubling) in bare land for Dedza during 2009–2019 might also suggest increasing encroachment into the forest reserves and suggest the need for more protection and improved management, including the Dzalanyama Forest Reserve at the southwestern end [
31].
The higher decline in the forest-mixed class in Dedza during 2009–2019 was mostly attributed to gains in agriculture, a trend also observed in previous studies. For example, local farmers contributed to an empirically observed decline in forest cover between 1999 and 2015 in Dedza due to agricultural expansion, and the use of forest products for fuelwood, charcoal production, and construction [
10]. Although most of the remaining forested areas are confined to forest reserves, tree plantations, and mixed agro-forestry cropping systems are also common. It is notable that Ntcheu gained in forest areas during 2009–2019, possibly due to a combination of locally improved farming practices that incorporated tree planting and forest management. For instance, the 2009 Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme (IFMSLP, 2006–2009, and 2011–2015) supported communities in forest-based income-generating activities, including honey, timber, and firewood production through proper forest management [
63]. Other recent efforts have enhanced the growth of highly vegetative and nitrogen-fixing legume crops such as pigeon peas as well as ‘fertilizer trees” such as
Glirididia sepium,
Faidherbia albida,
Sesbania sesban and
Tephrosia vogeii in mixed cropping systems with the improvement of soil organic matter and crop cover as major objectives [
64,
65].
The near linear increase in shrub-woodland areas that were dominant over the Ntcheu district (larger than 2.5 times increase during 2001–2019) suggests continuing disturbance and degradation of forest cover and succession or recovery, as also seen in earlier studies [
33]. The shrub-woodland class is also prone to spectral signature similarity to built-up areas (grass-thatched, wood, mud, and tin housing and scattered trees in home gardens) and is prevalent in rural areas in Malawi [
66]. Wetlands showed significant declines—by more than half—between 2001 (15%) and 2019 (7%) in Ntcheu. This phenomenon is also seen in a recent participatory mapping study aimed to facilitate discussions on how communities understand their landscapes, during which participants identified and mapped newly cultivated areas that used to be wetland areas [
43]. Additionally, participants linked hotspots for land-cover types signifying degradation to the incidence of illegal land renting and changes in climate patterns affecting sustainable land management [
43]. Similar studies across Africa reported the highest gains in land use were in agricultural land and most losses in grasslands and woodland and forests [
22,
31,
60].
Land Change Modeling (LCM) between 2001 and 2019 revealed a dynamic landscape with significant projected land transitions to agriculture as influenced by the group of six variables. A previous study [
10] showed comparable outcomes from land modeling in Dedza between 1991 and 2015, which local farmers attributed to proximity to roads and population growth. Distance from the water was locally perceived the least important driver [
10]. Land transitions for Ntcheu appeared to occur along a longitudinal gradient; found mainly in western upland-plateau areas where land-cover losses to agriculture were more prevalent. Conversion to agriculture is an ongoing process; thus, fragmentation of the landscape is expected to continue in the future.
Overall, there is no clear pattern of synoptic intensification across the sub-region, as agricultural land use remains persistent. This pattern of a fragmented agrarian landscape with some trees is evident across the landscape in Malawi where agro-forestry and soil amendment models increase tree cover while large contiguous plots of forest decline (also see 36). In such landscapes, one pathway in addressing sustainable land management is to understand the effectiveness of current delivery by agricultural extension in improving knowledge on landscape function and farming practices that increase landscape resilience [
67] while also observing land-cover management at the forest/agrarian landscape interface [
36,
61].
The projected LULC changes by 2050, reflecting agricultural cover-class dominance and a higher probability in Dedza (80% for transition to agriculture, 72% built-up, and 66% to barren land) are supported for Dedza by a previous study [
39] that also predicted increases in agriculture, built-up and barren areas by 2025 attributed to unsustainable farmland practices and township growth. Despite Ntcheu’s lower transition probability, there are still significant rates of change (43%) for agricultural land, particularly from shrub-woodland, forest-mixed, and significantly wetland classes, indicative of underlying landscape fragmentation and environmental degradation. Malawi’s wetland conversion and degradation has been understudied given its growing importance to enhance food and livelihood security through supplemental dry-season irrigated farming in a predominantly rain-fed agricultural system, but one paper recognized wetland degradation caused by long-term pressures from poor farming practices, and population settlements on upland areas, which are predicted to increase in response to climate change [
68]. Land-use management plans may need to be developed to equip communities and multiple stakeholders including government extension staff by first consolidating the diverse knowledge from multiple perspectives and emphasizing socio-economic and environmental benefits of functional landscapes such as wetlands to facilitate community engagement and promote sustainable land use management [
69].
We acknowledge some study limitations associated with using high-medium spatial resolution remotely sensed satellite imagery to capture land-cover patterns, as well as to model biophysical and social drivers of change in heterogenous landscapes. This study uses 30 m spatial resolution imagery to model six explanatory drivers assumed to directly capture LULCC processes without consideration of indirect drivers such as climate change and assumes a business-as-usual scenario. Spectral signature separation across some land-cover classes such as between shrub-woodland and forest-mixed, and among wetland, agriculture, built-up, and the other class categories was difficult at this spatial resolution, although classification was significantly aided by primary ground truth data. The use of higher spatial resolution data would enhance the analytical rigor of future studies but as such data increase the temporal extent of historical data and as prices come down.
Lastly, predictive modeling is data intensive and tries to capture multi-scale and multi-level driver interactions. However, some drivers such as social and economic drivers of LULC change, are not captured in remote sensing spectral sensors, thereby undermining the reliability of modeling outcomes [
70]. Moreover, we mentioned previous studies in the introduction section that utilized integrated methodological approaches for land use retrieval to better understand rural to urban transition and urban growth prediction [
24,
25] as well as the use of multiple integrated approaches and multi-sensor satellite imagery to capture unique heterogeneous landscape features that are non-existence in current land-cover products [
26], this study also contributes to filling this methodological gap.
Also noteworthy are limitations associated with the temporal framing of the image datasets. For example, we used the ‘dry season’ timeframe in this study and could have captured space-time information outside the space–time frame as indirect impacts can spill over to the land [
71]. Future studies could mitigate this limitation by exploring how model performance is influenced by seasonality (dry versus growing season) to maintain a realistic estimation. Moreover, future research could explore constraints and economic incentives, as well as short-long term policy implementations.