Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers
1
Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
3
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
4
Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(9), 1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091510
Received: 24 February 2020 / Revised: 5 May 2020 / Accepted: 7 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Flow Velocity, Channel Bathymetry, and River Discharge)
Satellites provide a temporally discontinuous record of hydrological conditions along Earth’s rivers (e.g., river width, height, water quality). The degree to which archived satellite data effectively capture the overall population of river flow frequency is unknown. Here, we use the entire archives of Landsat 5, 7, and 8 to determine when a cloud-free image is available over the United States Geological Survey (USGS) river gauges located on Landsat-observable rivers. We compare the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge record to the flow frequency distribution derived from ideally sampling gauged discharge based on the timing of cloud-free Landsat overpasses. Examining the patterns of flow frequency across multiple gauges, we find that there is not a statistically significant difference between the flow frequency distribution associated with observations contained within the Landsat archive and the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge data (α = 0.05), except for hydrological extremes like maximum and minimum flow. At individual gauges, we find that Landsat observations span a wide range of hydrological conditions (97% of total flow variability observed in 90% of the study gauges) but the degree to which the Landsat sample can represent flow frequency distribution varies from location to location and depends on sample size. The results of this study indicate that the Landsat archive is, on average, representative of the temporal frequencies of hydrological conditions present along Earth’s large rivers with broad utility for hydrological, ecologic and biogeochemical evaluations of river systems.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
Landsat; rivers; streamflow; discharge; flow frequency; satellite revisit time; flow regime
▼
Show Figures
Graphical abstract
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
- Supplementary File 1:
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 2779 KiB)
MDPI and ACS Style
Allen, G.H.; Yang, X.; Gardner, J.; Holliman, J.; David, C.H.; Ross, M. Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091510
AMA Style
Allen GH, Yang X, Gardner J, Holliman J, David CH, Ross M. Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(9):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091510
Chicago/Turabian StyleAllen, George H.; Yang, Xiao; Gardner, John; Holliman, Joel; David, Cédric H.; Ross, Matthew. 2020. "Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers" Remote Sens. 12, no. 9: 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091510
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Search more from Scilit
